Let's say I want to perform a function on every value of an object.
How can I catch the end of the iteration and to know that no error has been made running the function on each value?
Object.keys(result).map(function(key, index) {
var value = result[key];
functiontorun(value, (result, error) => {
if (error) {
// catch the error
}
});
// AT THE END OF THE ITERATION
// if no error at all => then something
// if at least one error => then something else
});
Turn each request into a promise, and use Promise.all on the result:
const allPromises = Object.keys(result).map(function(key, index) {
var value = result[key];
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
functiontorun(value, (result, error) => {
if (error) {
// catch the error
reject(error);
} else resolve();
});
});
});
Promise.all(allPromises)
.then(() => console.log('all successful'))
.catch(err => console.log('at least one error ' + err));
Related
im trying to write a promise but seems to be missing something. here is my code:
const myPromise = new Promise(() => {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("getting here");
return setinputs({ ...inputs, images: imageAsUrl });
}, 100);
});
myPromise
.then(() => {
console.log("getting here too");
firebase.database().ref(`collection/${idNode}`).set(inputs);
})
.then(() => {
console.log("all is set");
})
.catch((err) => {
console.log(err);
});
if i run the program, the first part of the promise is executing but all .then() functions arent executing. how do i fix this?
In this scheme, the promise callback has one (resolve) or two (resolve,reject) arguments.
let p = new Promise((resolve, reject)=> {
//do something
//resolve the promise:
if (result === "ok") {
resolve(3);
}
else {
reject("Something is wrong");
}
});
p.then(res => {
console.log(res); // "3"
}).catch(err => {
console.error(err); //"Something is wrrong
});
Of course, nowadays you can use async + await in a lot of cases.
You need to resolve the promise, using resolve() and also return the promise from firebase so the next .then in the chain works properly.
const myPromise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
setTimeout(() => {
console.log("getting here");
// You have to call resolve for all `.then` methods to be triggered
resolve({ ...inputs, images: imageAsUrl });
}, 100);
});
myPromise
.then((inputs) => {
console.log("getting here too");
// You have to return a promise in a .then function for the next .then to work properly
return firebase.database().ref(`collection/${idNode}`).set(inputs);
})
.then(() => {
console.log("all is set");
})
.catch((err) => {
console.log(err);
});
I am developing a SPFx WebPart using TypeScript.
I have a function to get a team by name (get() returns also a promise):
public getTeamChannelByName(teamId: string, channelName: string) {
return new Promise<MicrosoftGraph.Channel>(async (resolve, reject) => {
this.context.msGraphClientFactory
.getClient()
.then((client: MSGraphClient) =>{
client
.api(`/teams/${teamId}/channels`)
.filter(`displayName eq '${channelName}'`)
.version("beta")
.get((error, response: any) => {
if ( response.value.length == 1) {
const channels: MicrosoftGraph.Channel[] = response.value;
resolve(channels[0]);
} else if (response.value.length < 1) {
reject(new Error("No team found with the configured name"));
} else {
reject(new Error("Error XY"));
}
});
})
.catch(error => {
console.log(error);
reject(error);
});
});
}
I call this function like this:
public getConversations(teamName: string, channelName: string, messageLimitTopics: number = 0, messageLimitResponses: number = 0) {
return new Promise<any>(async (resolve, reject) => {
try {
this.getTeamGroupByName(teamName)
.then((teamGroup: MicrosoftGraph.Group) => {
const teamId: string = teamGroup.id;
this.getTeamChannelByName(teamId, channelName)
.then((teamChannel: MicrosoftGraph.Channel) => {
const channelId: string = teamChannel.id;
this.getChannelTopicMessages(teamId, channelId, messageLimitTopics)
.then((messages: MicrosoftGraph.Message[]) => {
const numberOfMessages = messages.length;
... // omitted
});
});
});
} catch(error) {
reject(error);
}
});
}
And this getConversations() function itself is called from my webpart code:
public getConversations() {
if (this.props.teamName && this.props.teamName.length > 0 &&
this.props.channelName && this.props.channelName.length > 0) {
GraphService.getConversations(this.props.teamName, this.props.channelName, this.props.messageLimitTopics, this.props.messageLimitResponses)
.then((conversations) => {
.. // omitted
})
.catch((err: Error) => {
console.log(err);
this.setState({errorMessage: err.message});
});
} else {
// Mandatory settings are missing
this.setState({errorMessage: strings.MandatorySettingsMissing});
}
}
So, as you can see, above, I want to write out the error (message) I receive from the reject inside the getConversations() functions. The problem is, that I don't receive this rejection with the error, but in the console I see the following:
Uncaught Error: No team found with the configured name
I added the .catch() blocks you see above inside getTeamChannelByName() but this doesn't get hit during debugging.
Haven't worked much with promises and I am still confused a bit about them, so I guess that I probably have constructed the promise chain wrongly, maybe placed the catch block(s) in the wrong position(s)?
I had a look at common mistakes done with Promises and I certainly had what is called a "Promise Hell".
So, I am not 100% sure yet, but I guess, the result of this was that there was no catch block for my .then("Promise") so the rejection went to nowhere.
I have now changed the calling method to this, and I also removed the try/catch blocks, as it is unnecessary:
public getConversations(teamName: string, channelName: string, messageLimitTopics: number = 0, messageLimitResponses: number = 0) {
return new Promise<any>(async (resolve, reject) => {
let teamId: string = null;
let channelId: string = null;
this.getTeamGroupIdByName(teamName)
.then(tId => {
teamId = tId;
return this.getTeamChannelIdByName(teamId,channelName);
})
.then(cId => {
channelId = cId;
return this.getChannelTopicMessages(teamId, channelId, messageLimitTopics);
})
.catch(error => {
reject(error);
});
});
}
I have async function in async function. In the second I must wait when promises resolve or reject and after run other code below. But if promise reject my code stopping and no run other functions. How I can fix it?
await axios.all(promises).then(res => {
axios.patch("/url", { foo: bar }).then(async () => {
const promises2 = arr.map(item => {
return axios.post("/url-2", item)
});
await Promise.all(promises2)
.then(() => console.log("resolved")) //this not calling ever
.catch(() => console.log("failed")) //this not calling ever
console.log("This console log ever not working")
})
})
Promises aren't chained properly, axios.patch(...) promise isn't returned. await is syntactic sugar for then and catch, its purpose is to get rid of nested functions where possible. It should be:
const res = await axios.all(promises)
await axios.patch("/url", { foo: bar })
const promises2 = arr.map(item => {
return axios.post("/url-2", item)
});
try {
await Promise.all(promises2)
console.log("resolved"))
} catch (err) {
console.log("failed");
}
The order of your code is wrong. Of course if the first promise is rejected, then the rest will not be called.
Try rewriting your code this way:
let res = await axios.all(promises).catch(() => { console.log("failed"); return false; });
if (!res) {
// Do something when rejected
....
}
// Call the 2nd promise
let res2 = await axios.path("/url", {foo: bar}).catch(() => {console.log("failed 2"); return false; });
if (!res2) {
// Do something when the 2nd promise is rejected
...
}
// Call your last promise
let res3 = await Promise.all(promises2).catch(() => {console.log("failed 3"); return false; });
if (!res3) {
// Do something if it is rejected again
....
}
// Otherwise, do your thing
Try this code, it should pinpoint where the error or rejection is occurring (i.e. it's definitely before Promise.all(promises2) is run
await axios.all(promises)
.then(res => axios.patch("/url", { foo: bar }), err => {
throw `all(promises) failed with ${err}`;
})
.then(() => {
const promises2 = arr.map(item => {
return axios.post("/url-2", item);
});
return Promise.all(promises2)
.then(() => console.log("resolved")) //this not calling ever
.catch(err => {
throw `all(promises2) failed with ${err}`;
});
}, err => {
throw `patch failed with ${err}`;
})
.catch(err => console.error(err));
Note I've removed async/await, because in the code you've posted it is totally unnecessary
Please forgive the fairly case-specific question, though I think the general end goal could be of use to other people.
Goal: Populate a MongoDB with data requested from multiple JSON API URLs.
Short question: So far I've had some success with request-promise, which uses Bluebird:
var rp = require('request-promise');
var options = {
uri: 'http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qsq5.json',
headers: {
'User-Agent': 'Request-Promise'
},
json: true
};
rp(options)
.then(function (body) {
// Mongoose allows us query db for existing PID and upsert
var query = {pid: body.programme.pid},
update = {
name: body.programme.title,
pid: body.programme.pid,
desc: body.programme.short_synopsis
},
options = { upsert: true, new: true };
// Find the document
Programme.findOneAndUpdate(query, update, options, function(err, result) {
if (err) return res.send(500, { error: err });
return res.send("succesfully saved");
});
})
.catch(function (err) {
return res.send(err);
})
But how do I loop over an array of URLs, without the program failing if any of the promises are rejected?
Something like this for example, using Bluebird, fails if any of the URLs errors.
const urls = ['http://google.be', 'http://google.uk']
Promise.map(urls, rp)
.map((htmlOnePage, index) => {
return htmlOnePage;
})
.then(console.log)
.catch((e) => console.log('We encountered an error' + e));
As I want to write to the DB with successful requests, and ignore those that might not be responding right then, I need something that skips over rejected promises, which .all does not do.
Long question:
I've been reading up about promises all day and it's making my head hurt! But I've found some good resources, such as https://pouchdb.com/2015/05/18/we-have-a-problem-with-promises.html, which mentions the use of a Promise factory. Would this work for my case? I initially thought I should make each request, process the result and add it to the DB, then move on to the next request; but having seen .all I thought I should do all the requests, save the results in an array and loop over that with my DB saving function.
Should I even be using Promises for this? Maybe I should just make use of something like async.js and run my requests in series.
Thanks very much for any help or ideas.
But how do I loop over an array of URLs, without the program failing if any of the promises are rejected?
if you return a value from .catch other than a rejected promise, you will return a resolved promise
So, your .then for each individual request could return an object like
{
success: true,
result: whateverTheResultIs
}
and your catch returns
{
success: false,
error: whateverTheErrorIs
}
Really you don't NEED the success property, it's a convenience though
So the code would be - assuming process(url) returns a Promise
Promise.map(urls, url =>
process(url)
.then(result => ({result, success:true}))
.catch(error => ({error, success:false}))
)
.then(results => {
let succeeded = results.filter(result => result.success).map(result => result.result);
let failed = results.filter(result => !result.success).map(result => result.error);
});
Or, in ES5
Promise.map(urls, function (url) {
return process(url).then(function (result) {
return { result: result, success: true };
}).catch(function (error) {
return { error: error, success: false };
});
}).then(function (results) {
var succeeded = results.filter(function (result) {
return result.success;
}).map(function (result) {
return result.result;
});
var failed = results.filter(function (result) {
return !result.success;
}).map(function (result) {
return result.error;
});
});
I don't know if this fit your case, but I think You can use a counter to check when all promises has returned, regardless of the fact that each one has been resolved or rejected
var heroes = [
'Superman',
'Batman',
'Spiderman',
'Capitan America',
'Ironman',
];
function getHero(hero) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
setTimeout(() => {
return Math.round(Math.random()) ? resolve(hero + ' lives') : reject(hero + ' dead');
}, Math.random() * 3000)
})
}
function checkHeroes() {
var checked = heroes.length;
heroes.forEach((hero) => {
getHero(hero)
.then((res) => {
checked --;
console.log(res);
if (!checked) done();
})
.catch((err) => {
checked --;
console.log(err);
if (!checked) done();
});
})
}
function done() {
console.log('All heroes checked');
}
checkHeroes();
I think your issue is less about the bluebird api than structuring your promise chain.
const reducePropsToRequests = (props) => Promise.resolve(Object
.keys(props)
.reduce((acc, key) => {
acc[key] = request(sources[key]);
return acc;
}, {}));
const hashToCollection = (hash) => Promise.resolve(Object
.keys(hash)
.reduce((acc, k) => {
return [...acc, {source: k, data: hash[k]}];
}, []));
const fetchFromSources = (sources) => Promise.props(sources);
const findSeveralAndUpdate = (results) => Promise
.each(results.map(obj => {
// you have access to original {a: 'site.com'}
// here, so use that 'a' prop to your advantage by abstracting out
// your db config somewhere outside your service
return Programme.findOneAndUpdate(someConfig[obj.source], obj.data);
}))
const requestFromSeveralAndUpdate = (sources) => reducePropsToRequests(sources)
.then(fetchFromSources)
.then(hashToCollection)
.then(findSeveralAndUpdate)
.catch(/* some err handler */);
requestFromSeveralAndUpdate({ a: 'site.com', b: 'site.net' });
I'd just use request and write my own promise with try catch inside that only resolves. Pseudo example below
var request = require('request')
var urls = ['http://sample1.com/json', 'http://sample2.com/json']
var processUrl = (url) => {
return new Promise((resolve,reject)=> {
var result;
try {
var myRequest = {
uri: url,
method: 'GET',
header: {...}
};
request(option, (res,body,err)=> {
if(err) {
result = err;
return;
}
result = body;
})
}
catch(e) {
result = e;
}
finally {
resolve(result)
}
})
}
I would like to create a function that returns a promise and if something throws an error within, it returns promise reject.
function promiseFunc(options) {
return new Promise(() => {
return options;
});
}
function myfunc(options) {
return new Promise(() => {
if (!options) throw new Error("missing options");
return promiseFunc(options).then((result) => {
if (result.throwerr) throw new Error("thrown on purpose");
return result.value;
});
});
};
My test as follows:
const myfunc = require("./myfunc");
describe('myfunc', () => {
it('should fail without options', () => {
return myfunc()
.then((result) => { throw new Error(result) }, (err) => {
console.log("test #1 result:", err.message === "missing options");
});
});
it('should fail on options.throwerr', () => {
return myfunc({throwerr: true})
.then((result) => {}, (err) => {
console.log("test #2 result:", err.message === "thrown on purpose");
});
});
it('should return options.value', () => {
return myfunc({value: "some result", throwerr: false})
.then((result) => {
console.log("test #3 result:", result === "some result");
}, (err) => {});
});
});
The first test pass, but the second and third fails.
Log #2 does not even run, so I assumed the "throw on purpose" messes up something, therefore I created test #3, where I don't throw anything, but it still fails.
What am I missing?
Solution:
function promiseFunc(options) {
return new Promise(resolve => {
return resolve(options);
});
}
function myfunc(options) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
if (!options) throw new Error("missing options");
return promiseFunc(options).then(result => {
if (result.throwerr) throw new Error("thrown on purpose");
return resolve(result.value);
}).catch(err => {
return reject(err);
});
});
};
You forgot to pass a function with resolve and reject parameters, so your promises just don't work.
function promiseFunc(options) {
return new Promise(resolve => { // resolve function
resolve(options)
})
}
module.exports = function myfunc(options) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { // since you may either resolve your promise or reject it, you need two params
if (!options) {
return reject(new Error("missing options"))
}
return promiseFunc(options).then(result => {
if (result.throwerr) {
return reject(new Error("thrown on purpose"))
}
resolve(result.value)
})
})
}
... and the test (mocha)
const assert = require('assert'),
myfunc = require("./myfunc")
describe('myfunc', () => {
it('should fail without options', done => { // mind the callback, promises are always async
myfunc()
.catch(err => {
assert(err.message === "missing options")
done() // <- called here
})
})
it('should fail on options.throwerr', done => {
myfunc({throwerr: true})
.catch(err => {
assert(err.message === "thrown on purpose")
done()
})
})
it('should return options.value', done => {
return myfunc({value: "some result", throwerr: false})
.then(result => {
assert(result === "some result")
done()
})
})
})
I would like to create a function that returns a promise and if something throws an error within, it returns promise reject.
This will do it ...
var q = require('q'); // In recent versions of node q is available by default and this line is not required
function iReturnAPromise(num) {
var def = q.defer();
if (typeof num=== 'number') {
try {
var value = 100 / num;
def.resolve(value);
} catch(e) {
def.reject("oops a division error - maybe you divided by zero");
}
} else {
def.reject("o no its not a number");
}
return def.promise;
}
PS this function was coded freehand and has not been tested - but this will work. Obviously try catch should be used sparingly.
PS I prefer the q library implementation of promise instead of the default node promise library - they take a very different approach. q dispenses with all the wrapping!
using the promise library u wanted ...
function iReturnAPromise(num) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
if (typeof num === 'number') {
try {
var value = 100 / num;
resolve(value);
} catch (e) {
reject("oops a division error - maybe you divided by zero");
}
} else {
reject("o no its not a number");
}
})
}
iReturnAPromise(7).then(
function(response) {console.log("success", response)},
function(response) {console.log("failure", response)}
);
// Unexpectedly this is not an error in node 5.6 because div by 0 is not an error operation anymore!
iReturnAPromise(0).then(
function(response) {console.log("success", response)},
function(response) {console.log("failure", response)}
);
iReturnAPromise("fred").then(
function(response) {console.log("success", response)},
function(response) {console.log("failure", response)}
);
you can see why i prefer the q syntax :)