I am getting data from my API like this:
function getWeight (username) {
/* This function takes a username as a parameter,
then it calls the API URL using the username
so that it gets the weights of that particular
user.
*/
var weights;
$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url: '/weight/api/get_weight_data_admin/'+username,
dataType: 'json',
async: false,
success: function (data) {
weights = data
}
});
getWeightPlots(weights);
}
The above code is working as expected when I do console.log(weights) it shows me exactly what I expect:
The problem lies in the code below; the list which I create in the function below, and append values to it inside the while loop, after exiting while loop I see no values in it.
function getWeightPlots (weights) {
/**
* This function takes a list of dictionaries, which contain
* dates when the weight was entered and the weight itself.
* It returns a list of weights that can be used for plotting on
* the graph.
*/
var weightList = [];
// get the last 12 months
var months = getMonths();
var numWeights = weights.length;
var i = 0;
var y = 0;
while (y < months.length) {
var weightMonthNum = weights[i]
weightMonthNum = weightMonthNum['date']
weightMonthNum = weightMonthNum.split('-');
weightMonthNum = parseInt(weightMonthNum[1])
var monthNum = monthToMonthNum(months[y])
if (weightMonthNum < monthNum){
i++;
}
else if (weightMonthNum == monthNum) {
weightList.push(1);
i++;
y++;
}
else {
y++;
weightList.push(0);
}
}
console.log(weightList);
}
I tried debugging and everything seems to be working fine, any ideas?
When getWeightPlots is invoked weights is empty (undefined). Wait for ajax to finish then call it in the success method.
Related
I have been writing javascript/jquery for about 2 days so I know very little. I have a set of variables that I am pulling from a page. I then write back to a database using API a duplication of that information x number of times. I am using a loop to complete the x number of times. I have a variable called newBar. It starts out being defined by adding 1 to another variable called curBar. What I am having trouble with is I need newBar to increase by 1 each time the loop is completed. I can't seem to wrap my head around how to accomplish this.
$(document).on('Start.view-render.view_536', function (event, view, data) {
var curBar = Start.models['view_536'].toJSON().field_173;
var barCount = prompt("How many total barcodes to generate?");
var loopCount = --barCount;
console.log( loopCount );
var newBar = ++curBar;
// Add a button to execute the action
$('#' + view.key).prepend('<button id="copy-button">Duplicate Barcodes</button>');
var duplicateInventory = {
field_170: data.field_170_raw[0].id, //Customer
field_171: data.field_171_raw[0].id,//inbound order
field_173: newBar,//barcode
field_178: data.field_178_raw[0].id,//Product
field_185: data.field_185,//product type
//field_443: data.field_443_raw[0].id > 0 ? data.field_443_raw[0].id : "",//batches-order item
field_175: data.field_175,//date received
field_186: data.field_186,//semi-finished weight
field_176: data.field_176,//Inbound Container #
field_177: data.field_177_raw[0].id,//warehouse
field_183: data.field_183,//inbound verified
field_221: data.field_221_raw[0].id,//order item
//field_352: data.field_352_raw[0].id > 0 ? data.field_352_raw[0].id : "", //STO
};
// Add the duplicate function to the button we just added
document.getElementById('copy-button').addEventListener('click', function () {
for(var i = 0; i < loopCount; i++){ //start duplicate loop
$.ajax( {
url: 'https://api.somedomain.com/v1/objects/object_10/records/',
type: 'POST',
headers: {'X-Application-Id': 'xxxx', 'X-API-Key':'xxxx'},
data: duplicateInventory,
success: function(response) {
// alert('Record Copied!');
}
});
}//End of Loop
});
});
I have a problem with my callback functions. My code is supposed to make 16 GET requests to a REST API to pull 16 different JSON files. It then needs to parse each of these JSON's to a dictionary for that week's football table rankings, and ultimately save each entry into a 'dictionary of dictionaries', HistoricalTable, to give the league ranking for the past 16 weeks. However, when I run the associated callback functions, the various LeagueTable variables seem to work fine, but when I try and save these into the Historical Data, the final array appears to have the same LeagueTable entry for each, looking like this.
Here is an image of the console output for my final table. Each entry should be different, whereas each entry seems to be the most recent week.
//This creates the modifier for the URL used in the GET request
var MatchDayList = []
for (i = 0; i < 17; i++) {
MatchDayList[i] = i
}
MatchDayList.shift()
var HistoricalTable = {}
var LeagueTable = {}
// This executes the GET request
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
url = 'http://api.football-data.org/v1/competitions/445/leagueTable/?matchday=' + MatchDayList[i],
$.ajax({
url: 'http://api.football-data.org/v1/competitions/445/leagueTable/?matchday=' + MatchDayList[i],
headers: {
'X-Auth-Token': ''
},
method: 'GET',
dataType: 'json',
success: function(data) {
handleData(data)
},
});
}
//This function should append the retrieved JSON to the LeagueTable variable
function handleData(data) {
for (var j = 0; j < 20; j++) {
LeagueTable[data.standing[j].position] = data.standing[j].teamName
LeagueTable[20] = data.matchday
}
saveData(LeagueTable)
}
//This function should save each LeagueTable matchday data into a bigger array, HistoricalTable
function saveData(LeagueTable) {
HistoricalTable[LeagueTable[20]] = LeagueTable
console.log(HistoricalTable)
}
You are using a single LeagueTable variable throughout the entire code. So every call to handleData populates the same LeagueTable, then tells saveData to store it in the main table. So you end up with 16 references to the same table.
To solve it, it should be enough to move the variable declaration inside handleData function:
function handleData(data) {
var LeagueTable = {};
for (var j = 0; j < 20; j++) {
LeagueTable[data.standing[j].position] = data.standing[j].teamName
LeagueTable[20] = data.matchday
}
saveData(LeagueTable)
}
On a side note, your url variable is not declared anywhere, so it ends up in the global scope, which is generally bad practice. Same with i indices inside your for loops.
I have a javascript function that has about 4 ajax requests in it. It typically takes less than a second to run. However, I'm working on the error handling now and was wondering. How long, in seconds, should I allow my javascript function to try to keep working until I manually cancel it and allow the user to try again?
Here's what the function in question looks like. (not everything is there, but it could potentially have (1000*5000*3)+(70)+(1000)+(6)+(2500) bytes being sent)
function saveChanges(bypassDeckSave){
// bypassDeckSave = undefined - does not bypass
showSavedNotification_check = 1;
if(userid != 0){
//values in database
var subjectID = $('.lib_folder_id').val(),
folderID = $('.lib_subject_id').val();
if(subjectID == 0 || folderID == 0){//if database values null, ask for some
console.log("db deck location not saved, asked for it");
//values to set to
var setFolderID = $('.libDeckLocationModifierDiv .folders li.on').val(),
setSubjectID = $('.libDeckLocationModifierDiv .subjects li.on').val();
if(isNaN(setFolderID) || isNaN(setSubjectID) ||
setFolderID == 0 || setSubjectID == 0)
{
openDeckLocationDiv();
showSavedNotification_check = 0;
return;
}
}
}
var deck_id = $('.deck_id').val();
if(deck_id == 0){
// create a new deck
createDeckThenSave();
return;
}
if(userid != 0){
//values in database
var subjectID = $('.lib_folder_id').val(),
folderID = $('.lib_subject_id').val();
if(subjectID == 0 || folderID == 0){//if database values null, ask for some
//values to set to
saveDeckLocation();
}
}
// removes empty rows
$('.editMain li').each(function(){
var one = $(this).find('.text1').val(),
two = $(this).find('.text2').val();
if(one == "" && two == ""){
//remove this row and remove value from updateSaveArray + add to delete array
var currentval = $(this).val();
var rowid = ".row_"+currentval;
updateSaveArray = jQuery.grep(updateSaveArray, function(value) {
return value != currentval;
});
$(rowid).remove();
updateDeleteArray[updateDeleteArray.length] = currentval;
}
});
if(bypassDeckSave == undefined){
// save deck info to db
var deckname = $('.editDeckNameInput').val(),
cardCount = $('.editMain li.mainLi:visible').length,
deckTermLanguage = $('.selector.one select').val(),
deckDefinitionLanguage = $('.selector.two select').val(),
deckThirdBoxLanguage = $('.selector.three select').val(),
deckDescription = $('.editMoreDeckOptionsDiv textarea').val();
if($('.editMoreDeckOptionsSelector .onlyme').hasClass("on")){
var viewPreferences = 1;
}else{
var viewPreferences = 0;
}
if($('.editUseThirdboxDiv').hasClass('on')){ var thirdbox = 1;
}else{ var thirdbox = 2; }
// console.log("deckInfoSave called");
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/edit/deckInfoSave.php",
data: { pDeckid: deck_id, pDeckname: deckname, pCardCount: cardCount,
pDeckTermLanguage: deckTermLanguage, pDeckDefinitionLanguage: deckDefinitionLanguage,
pDeckThirdBoxLanguage: deckThirdBoxLanguage, pThirdbox: thirdbox,
pDeckDescription: deckDescription, pViewPreferences: viewPreferences
}
})
.done(function(data){
// console.log(data);
// decksaved = 1;
saveDeckInfoHasFinished = 1;
});
}else{
saveDeckInfoHasFinished = 1;
}
// prepares edited card array
// gets all needed values and stores in holdSaveCardArray
var holdSaveCardArray = [];
for (i = 0; i < updateSaveArray.length; ++i) {
var currentCard_id = updateSaveArray[i],
rowidClass = ".row_"+currentCard_id,
text1val = $(rowidClass+" .text1").val(),
text2val = $(rowidClass+" .text2").val(),
text3val = $(rowidClass+" .text3").val();
cardOrder = $(".editMain li.mainLi:visible").index($(rowidClass)) + 1;
holdSaveCardArray[holdSaveCardArray.length] = {
"card_id": currentCard_id,
"text1val": text1val,
"text2val": text2val,
"text3val": text3val,
"cardOrder": cardOrder
};
}
// console.log(print_r(holdSaveCardArray));
// delete cards start
// deletes any card with an id in updateDeleteArray
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/edit/deleteCards.php",
data: { pDeck_id: deck_id, pDeleteArray: updateDeleteArray }
})
.done(function( msg ) {
// $('.temp').append(msg);
updateDeleteArray = [];
deleteCardsHasFinished = 1;
});
// save cards to database
// loops through each card that had changes made to it
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/edit/saveCardsArray.php",
dataType: "JSON",
data: { pDeck_id: deck_id, pCardArray: holdSaveCardArray}
}).done(function(data){
for (var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
var temp_id = data[i]["temp_id"], // new id
card_key = data[i]["card_key"], // old id
currentClassName = 'row_'+temp_id,
currentClass = '.row_'+temp_id,
nextClassName = 'row_'+card_key;
$(currentClass).val(card_key);
$(currentClass).removeClass(currentClassName).addClass(nextClassName);
}
saveCardsHasFinished = 1;
});
updateSaveArray = [];
// update order start // uses li value
updateOrderArray = [];
$('.editMain').find(".mainLi").each(function(){
var temp = $(this).val();
updateOrderArray[updateOrderArray.length] = temp;
});
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "/edit/orderCards.php",
data: { pUpdateOrderArray: updateOrderArray }
})
.done(function( msg ) {
updateOrder = 0;
updateOrdersHasFinished = 1;
});
closeLibDLM(); console.log("closeLibDLM1");
changeSaveStudyButton(1);
} //saveChanges function end
So you could totally set an arbitrary timeout, or even a timeout that should encompass everything finishing on time? But, what happens when it doesn't? What happens when it takes longer to finish?
At that point, you're going to be in quite a pickle. I did not thoroughly read your code, but I would highly advise trying to use a callback() or Promise to end your function. And, not set a timeout. - This is a cleaner solution in that things happen when you want them, and after some defined has happened. Time is a relative, and finicky attribute of our world (Einstein proved this =P) that would be best be used as your friend, and not your enemy.
The counter argument would be, well sometimes things just hang. And, that is totally valid. For that case, you could set a timeout for a long period of time. But, again, that is still a 'hacky' way to handle things. In this case, I would try to create some handling to detect errors, or timeouts. i.e you could periodically check the page for a status. You could check to see which events are in existence that you could hook into.
If you could share in what instances our program hangs, I could better suggest a solution. Otherwise this question may end up being opinionated based on coding styles.
Hope this helps in some regard :)
I've worked in the Aerospace Aviation Industry and have asked a similar question when working with Microcontrollers. It seems you are looking for an appropriate timeout value based on calculation, but this may not be necessary in your case. Often times timeout values are more or less arbitrary. If your function executes in an average of roughly 1 second, maybe your timeout value should be set to 3 seconds. You should come to a conclusion based on testing.
Hi I'm making a javascript script which now is getting really hard to edit, and hard to understand for other people, I'll put it here hoping someone can understand it and give some advice or help
function fetchMember(id, select, sitename, total) {
return function() {
progress();
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: "script.php",
data: $("#fetch").serialize() + "&id=" + id,
success: function(data) {
isUser = ($(data).text().indexOf("Invalid User") == -1);
if (isUser) {
username = $(data).find(".normal").text();
saved = id - invalid;
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: "save.php",
data: {'username': username},
success: function(data) {
$("#test").append(id+" "+data + "<br />");
select.text(sitename+"("+saved+"/"+total+")"); //Updating numbers of fetched profiles on the frontend
}
});
}
else
invalid++; //loop again here because a user wan't valid
progress();
}
});
}
}
for (i = 0; i < members; i++) {
fetched++;
setTimeout(fetchMember(fetched, select, sitename, total), wait*i);
}
basically what I need to do is to loop again if at the end of the operation there are some invalid users, any help is really appreciated
I wonder if this code would help you, though it's not completely adapted for your case and wasn't tested. The main principle is the recursive call of memberFetch function. No need for timeouts in this case - it won't make any new requests to the server until it got a response for the last one. Feel free to ask any questions, but please try to experiment yourself :)
var currentId = 0; // Current member id
var membersNum = 10; // There are 10 members from 0 to 9
var neededValidUsersNum = 5; // We need only 5 valid users...
var valudUsersNum = 0; // ... but now we have 0 of them
// Let's make an array of all possible id's
// It will be a queue - we will try to fetch the first id
// In case of success - save data, remove that id from the queue, fetch the nex one
// Otherwise - put it at the back of the queue to try it again later
var possibleIds = [];
for (var i = 0; i < membersNum; i++) {
possibleIds.push(i);
}
// Fetched user data storage
var userData = {};
function fetchMember(id) {
var data = "some data";
$.post('script.php', data)
.done(function(responseData){
onFetchMemberDone(id, responseData);
})
.fail(function(){
onFetchMemberFail(id);
});
}
function onFetchMemberDone(id, responseData){
// Save recieved user data
userData[id] = responseData;
// Bump valid users num
valudUsersNum++;
// If there are not enough valid users - lets continue:
if (valudUsersNum < neededValidUsersNum) {
// Remove valide user from the queue (it was the first one)
possibleIds.shift();
// try to fetch the next one
var nextPossibleId = possibleIds[0];
fetchMember(nextPossibleId);
}
}
function onFetchMemberFail(id){
// add failed user to the end of the queue
possibleIds.push(id);
// try to fetch the next one
var nextPossibleId = possibleIds[0];
fetchMember(nextPossibleId);
}
// Lets launch the cycle! It doesn't look like one because it works through recursive calls
onFetchMember(0);
I have a table called Subscription and another table called Client I need the gender of the Client who owns the subscription every time I make an update. Here's my update script:
function update(item, user, request) {
var subscriptionId = item.id;
var subscriptionActivitiesTable = tables.getTable("SubscriptionActivity");
var userTable = tables.getTable("User");
var activityTable = tables.getTable("Activity");
var userGender = userTable.where({id: item.UserId}).select('Gender').take(1).read();
console.log(userGender);
activityTable.where({PlanId:item.PlanId, Difficulty: item.Difficulty}).read({
success: function(results){
var startDate = item.StartDate;
results.forEach(function(activity)
{
var testDate = new Date(startDate.getFullYear(),startDate.getMonth(), startDate.getDate());
testDate.setDate(testDate.getDate() + activity.Sequence + (activity.Week*7));
subscriptionActivitiesTable.insert({SubscriptionId: subscriptionId,
ActivityId: activity.id, ShowDate: new Date(testDate.getFullYear(),
testDate.getMonth(), testDate.getDate()), CreationDate: new Date()});
})
}
});
var planWeeks = 12;//VER DE DONDE SACAMOS ESTE NUMERO
var idealWeight = 0;
if (userGender === "Male")
{
idealWeight = (21.7 * Math.pow(parseInt(item.Height)/100,2));
}
else
{
idealWeight = (23 * Math.pow(parseInt(item.Height)/100,2));
}
var metabolismoBasal = idealWeight * 0.95 * 24;
var ADE = 0.1 * metabolismoBasal;
var activityFactor;
if (item.Difficulty === "Easy")
{
activityFactor = 1.25;
}
else if(item.Difficulty === "Medium")
{
activityFactor = 1.5;
}
else
{
activityFactor = 1.75;
}
var caloricRequirement = ((metabolismoBasal + ADE)*activityFactor);
activityTable.where(function(item, caloricRequirement){
return this.PlanId === item.PlanId && this.Type != "Sport" &&
this.CaloricRequirementMin <= caloricRequirement &&
this.CaloricRequirementMax >= caloricRequirement;}, item, caloricRequirement).read({
success: function(results)
{
var startDate = item.StartDate;
results.forEach(function(activity)
{
for (var i=0;i<planWeeks;i++)
{
var testDate = new Date(startDate.getFullYear(),startDate.getMonth(), startDate.getDate());
testDate.setDate(testDate.getDate() + activity.Sequence + (i*7));
subscriptionActivitiesTable.insert({SubscriptionId: subscriptionId,
ActivityId: activity.id, ShowDate: new Date(testDate.getFullYear(),
testDate.getMonth(), testDate.getDate()), CreationDate: new Date()});
}
})
}
})
request.execute();
}
I tried the code above and clientGender is undefined. As you can see I want to use the gender to set the idealWeight.
The read() method expects a function to be passed in on the success parameter - it doesn't return the result of the query like you'd think.
Try something like this instead:
function update(item, user, request) {
var clientTable = tables.getTable("Client");
var clientGender = 'DEFAULT';
clientTable.where({id: item.ClientId}).select('Gender').take(1).read({
success: function(clients) {
if (clients.length == 0) {
console.error('Unable to find client for id ' + item.ClientId);
} else {
var client = client[0];
clientGender = client.Gender;
// since we're inside the success function, we can continue to
// use the clientGender as it will reflect the correct value
// as retrieved from the database
console.log('INSIDE: ' + clientGender);
}
}
});
// this is going to get called while the clientTable query above is
// still running and will most likely show a value of DEFAULT
console.log('OUTSIDE: ' + clientGender);
}
In this sample, the client table query is kicked off, with a callback function provided in the success parameter. When the query is finished, the callback function is called, and the resulting data is displayed to the log. Meanwhile - while the query is still running, that is - the next statement after the where/take/select/read fluent code is run, another console.log statment is executed to show the value of the clientGender field outside the read function. This code will run while the read statement is still waiting on the database. Your output should look something like this in the WAMS log:
* INSIDE: Male
* OUTSIDE: Default
Since the log shows the oldest entries at the bottom, you can see that the OUTSIDE log entry was written sometime before the INSIDE log.
If you're not used to async or functional programming, this might look weird, but as far as I've found, this is now node works. Functions nested in functions nested in functions can get kind of scary, but if you plan ahead, it probably won't be too bad :-)