I have been searching A LOT to find a simple way to loop through an array (I haven't used javascript much) and I just can't seem to make sense of the examples I've seen.
I also want to retrieve data from an array...
The following example I can understand:
https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_loop_for.asp
But it's just not useful for the use case I want it for.
Say I have an array that looks like this:
array1 = [{'key':1, 'values':["one", "1"]}, {'key':2, 'values':["two", "2"]}]
Question 1: How can I access the first object in that array, i.e. where the 'key' = 1?
Question 2: How can I then loop through the "values" from this object?
e.g. In Python I would do something like:
get_first_object = array1[0]
for value in array1['values']:
print value
How can I do this kind of coding in javascript?
Edit
I didn't mention this properly
My "array1" is coming from a Python view and so the output of this is different to a standard JS array (see output of console.log below):
["[{'key': 1, 'values': ["one", "1"]}, {'key': 2, 'values':["two", "2"]}]"]
so when I do var object = array1[0] I get the following output:
[{'key': 1, 'values': ["one", "1"]}, {'key': 2, 'values': ["two", "2"]}]
It doesn't seem to be getting the first object but rather seeing the whole thing as one object.
Also
I require to get this dynamically - so I can't actually hard code "array1[0]" or "array1[1]" - How can I do this?
How I am defining the array
var array1 = ["{{ my_array_1|safe }}"];
Edit 2
The way I wish to get the object from the array is like so:
var selected_id = 1;
var selected_object = array[key=selected_id];
Let's assume that your array is this:
var array = [{'key': 1, 'values': ["one", "1"]}, {'key': 2, 'values': ["two", "2"]}];
This is an array which contains javascript objects, each with 2 properties, 'key', whose corresponding value is an integer and 'values' whose corresponding value is an array of data. If I understand this correctly, you want, given an integer input_id, to access the aforementioned array of data.
function access_data (id) {
for(let obj of array){
if(obj['key'] == id){
return obj['values'];
}
}
}
If you are familiar with python you probably recognize the for .... of syntax, since it's basically the same as python's for .... in. The above code assumes that your array is a global variable called array. Calling the function with an integer argument loops through every object your array contains, checks if its 'key' property matches the given id, and if it does, the corresponding array of data is returned.
More details on for ... of loops here
This self explanatory code should rectify your doubts
var array1 = [{'key':1, 'values':["one", "1"]}, {'key':2, 'values':["two", "2"]}];
// First Object
var firstObject = array1[0];
console.log("First object", firstObject);
// Accessing key property of first object
var keyOfFirstObj = firstObject.key;
console.log("Key", keyOfFirstObj);
// Iterating through all the values of first object
Object.values(firstObject).forEach(
el => console.log("Value -- ", el)
)
You can hardcode it: array1[0].key // 1
Use forEach to loop over:
const array1 = [{'key':1, 'values':["one", "1"]}, {'key':2, 'values':["two", "2"]}]
array1.forEach(arrItem => console.log(arrItem))
Or map over it if you intend to change datas as #str said below:
const array1 = [{'key':1, 'values':["one", "1"]}, {'key':2, 'values':["two", "2"]}]
array1.map(arrayItem => console.log(arrayItem);
On mapvs forEach:
https://codeburst.io/javascript-map-vs-foreach-f38111822c0f
There are a few ways to do this, the basic for loop and the for..of loop
for
for (let i = 0; i < array1.length; i++) {
console.log(array1[i])
}
for..of
for (const val of array1) {
console.log(val)
}
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for...of
if you want to select an object that has a key property of "1", you could loop through the array using the methods above, returung when that condition is true, or you could use Array#filter
const filtered = array1.filter(item => item['key'] === 1) //=> returns a new array
const myObj = filtered[0]
If you want a similar syntax to Python, you Coups use the for...in loop:
let get_first_object = array1[0];
for (let index in array1['values']){
console.log(array1['values'][index]);
}
Edit:
As for your edit, you need 2 loops
let objectArray= array1[0];
if(objectArray){
for(let outerIndex in objectArray){
for(let innerIndex in objectArray[outerIndex]['values']){
console.log(objectArray[outerIndex]['values'][innerIndex];
}
}
}
Edit:
let objectArray= array1[0];
if(objectArray){
let valuesObject=objectArray.filter(f=>f.key===selectedId);
for(let innerIndex in valuesObject['values']){
console.log(valuesObject ['values'][innerIndex];
}
}
}
Related
Are there any substantial reasons why modifying Array.push() to return the object pushed rather than the length of the new array might be a bad idea?
I don't know if this has already been proposed or asked before; Google searches returned only a myriad number of questions related to the current functionality of Array.push().
Here's an example implementation of this functionality, feel free to correct it:
;(function() {
var _push = Array.prototype.push;
Array.prototype.push = function() {
return this[_push.apply(this, arguments) - 1];
}
}());
You would then be able to do something like this:
var someArray = [],
value = "hello world";
function someFunction(value, obj) {
obj["someKey"] = value;
}
someFunction(value, someArray.push({}));
Where someFunction modifies the object passed in as the second parameter, for example. Now the contents of someArray are [{"someKey": "hello world"}].
Are there any drawbacks to this approach?
See my detailed answer here
TLDR;
You can get the return value of the mutated array, when you instead add an element using array.concat[].
concat is a way of "adding" or "joining" two arrays together. The awesome thing about this method, is that it has a return value of the resultant array, so it can be chained.
newArray = oldArray.concat[newItem];
This also allows you to chain functions together
updatedArray = oldArray.filter((item) => {
item.id !== updatedItem.id).concat[updatedItem]};
Where item = {id: someID, value: someUpdatedValue}
The main thing to notice is, that you need to pass an array to concat.
So make sure that you put your value to be "pushed" inside a couple of square brackets, and you're good to go.
This will give you the functionality you expected from push()
You can use the + operator to "add" two arrays together, or by passing the arrays to join as parameters to concat().
let arrayAB = arrayA + arrayB;
let arrayCD = concat(arrayC, arrayD);
Note that by using the concat method, you can take advantage of "chaining" commands before and after concat.
Are there any substantial reasons why modifying Array.push() to return the object pushed rather than the length of the new array might be a bad idea?
Of course there is one: Other code will expect Array::push to behave as defined in the specification, i.e. to return the new length. And other developers will find your code incomprehensible if you did redefine builtin functions to behave unexpectedly.
At least choose a different name for the method.
You would then be able to do something like this: someFunction(value, someArray.push({}));
Uh, what? Yeah, my second point already strikes :-)
However, even if you didn't use push this does not get across what you want to do. The composition that you should express is "add an object which consist of a key and a value to an array". With a more functional style, let someFunction return this object, and you can write
var someArray = [],
value = "hello world";
function someFunction(value, obj) {
obj["someKey"] = value;
return obj;
}
someArray.push(someFunction(value, {}));
Just as a historical note -- There was an older version of JavaScript -- JavaScript version 1.2 -- that handled a number of array functions quite differently.
In particular to this question, Array.push did return the item, not the length of the array.
That said, 1.2 has been not been used for decades now -- but some very old references might still refer to this behavior.
http://web.archive.org/web/20010408055419/developer.netscape.com/docs/manuals/communicator/jsguide/js1_2.htm
By the coming of ES6, it is recommended to extend array class in the proper way , then , override push method :
class XArray extends Array {
push() {
super.push(...arguments);
return (arguments.length === 1) ? arguments[0] : arguments;
}
}
//---- Application
let list = [1, 3, 7,5];
list = new XArray(...list);
console.log(
'Push one item : ',list.push(4)
);
console.log(
'Push multi-items :', list.push(-9, 2)
);
console.log(
'Check length :' , list.length
)
Method push() returns the last element added, which makes it very inconvenient when creating short functions/reducers. Also, push() - is a rather archaic stuff in JS. On ahother hand we have spread operator [...] which is faster and does what you needs: it exactly returns an array.
// to concat arrays
const a = [1,2,3];
const b = [...a, 4, 5];
console.log(b) // [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
// to concat and get a length
const arrA = [1,2,3,4,5];
const arrB = [6,7,8];
console.log([0, ...arrA, ...arrB, 9].length); // 10
// to reduce
const arr = ["red", "green", "blue"];
const liArr = arr.reduce( (acc,cur) => [...acc, `<li style='color:${cur}'>${cur}</li>`],[]);
console.log(liArr);
//[ "<li style='color:red'>red</li>",
//"<li style='color:green'>green</li>",
//"<li style='color:blue'>blue</li>" ]
var arr = [];
var element = Math.random();
assert(element === arr[arr.push(element)-1]);
How about doing someArray[someArray.length]={} instead of someArray.push({})? The value of an assignment is the value being assigned.
var someArray = [],
value = "hello world";
function someFunction(value, obj) {
obj["someKey"] = value;
}
someFunction(value, someArray[someArray.length]={});
console.log(someArray)
So the issues that I am currently having is a string manipulation logic issue. My goal is to store the names of JSON objects in a string array. So it will be easier to access the data later on. But the current issue that I am running into is that the output is nothing that I want or understand of how it is getting it. Currently I am looking for the quotes between the object names and returning it to a string using str.substring, and storing it in an index of newArr. The output equals in 4th code snippet. I have also tried putting an underscore before and after the object name in the JSON object, then searching for the underscore. From my testing this will only work with the first name, which will return "foo" in index 0, while the rest of the indexes equal to '"_'. I know there is something wrong with my logic in the function, but I can not pinpoint what it is. Any help would be appreciated
This is the function that is being ran.
exports.jsonObjectToArray = function (objectToTurn){
var oldArr = JSON.stringify(objectToTurn).split(","),
firstIndex,
secondIndex,
newArr = [];
for(let i = 0; i < oldArr.length; i ++){
firstIndex = oldArr[i].indexOf("\"");
secondIndex = oldArr[i].indexOf(firstIndex, "\"");
newArr[i] = oldArr[i].substring(firstIndex, secondIndex);
}
return newArr;
}
When the function is ran oldArr will equal to this value.
[ '{"foo":"',
'"bar":"0"',
'"Mar":"0"',
'"Car":"0"}'
]
And my goal is to return this. Which will be stored in newArr.
[
"foo",
"bar",
"Mar",
"Car"
]
But after the function runs this is what I get returned.
[
'{"',
'bar":"0',
'Mar":"0',
'Car":"0'
]
To get the keys from an object, simply use Object.keys().
Quick example:
var obj = {
foo: '1',
bar: '2',
car: '3'
};
console.log(Object.keys(obj)); // ==> (3) ["foo", "bar", "car"]
let arr = [ '{"foo":"',
'"bar":"0"',
'"Mar":"0"',
'"Car":"0"}'
]
let arr1 = arr.map(el => el.split('"')[1])
not sure how to ask tbh :)
I'm used of PHP's associative arrays so much that I struggle to understand how to create an "named array" of objects.
Example:
I have two arrays, two ints and one boolean. This represents one of my entities. I have multiple entities on which I'm doing some work.
In PHP I would write:
$entitites[$entitity_id]['items'][] = $item;
$entitites[$entitity_id]['items_status'][] = $item_status;
$entitites[$entitity_id]['items_count']++;
and so on..
How do I do this with objects in JS?
var entities = {items:[], items_status: [], items_count: 0};
entities[entity_id].items.push(item)
How does one name his object for later access (via name or in my case, entity_id?)
This code doesnt work for me to this extend that my webpage goes blank without any errors produced :S
I also tried this:
var entities = {};
var entity = {items:[], items_status: [], items_count: 0};
but then I dont know how to always add values to already existing object in entities object and how to call that exact object via name eg. entity_id.
Halp :(
Keep entities as an object. Then you can just go ahead and add each entity_id as a key and an object which has all the details of that entity as the value.
var entities = {};
entities["1234"] = {
"items" : [],
"items_status" : [],
"items_count" : 0
};
There are 2 types involved here: Objects & Arrays.
Arrays are simple and you're probably familiar with them from any other language:
var myArray = []; // this is an empty array
myArray[0] = 1;
myArray[1] = 2;
myArray[2] = 3;
// you could also use "var myArray = [1, 2, 3];" instead
alert(myArray[1]); // alerts the value 2
Note: arrays are actually objects, and can have non-index properties as well
You can also use various array functions such as .push(), .pop(), .shift() and so on to mutate the array instead.
Objects share the square brackets notation, but the purpose is different:
var myObject = {}; // this is an empty object
myObject[0] = 1;
myObject[1] = 2;
myObject[2] = 3;
alert(myObject[1]); // alerts the value 2
// but also...
myObject['prop'] = 4;
alert(myObject['prop']); // alerts the value 4
// and
myObject.prop2 = 5;
alert(myObject.prop2); // alerts the value 5
// and lastly
alert(myObject.prop); // alerts the value 4
So while arrays are accessed by index, objects are accessed by property names.
As for your entities, it looks like an array of objects. Lets see how we can do that:
function Entity() {
this.items = [];
this.items_status = [];
this.items_count = 0;
}
var entitites = [];
entities.push(new Entity());
entities[0].items = [1, 2, 3];
entities[0].items_status = ['good', 'good', 'poor'];
entities[0].items_count = 3;
Or you can wrap insertion in a more elegant function:
Entity.prototype.insert(item, status) {
this.items.push(item);
this.items_status.push(status);
this.items_count++;
}
entities[0].insert(4, 'excellent!');
If you want to keep control of the indexes in your JS array you can do so by not using .push() :
var entities = [];
entities[5] = {items:[], items_status:[], items_count:0};
Just replace 5 by your integer entity_id variable, and there you go.
You can use a regular javascript object to create the associative array you're looking for.
Actually it's PHP's implementation that's abit off but all they do is call it different (associative array) to most other language that simply refer to it as an object or hash.
You can use numeric keys in JS and still access them with the [] square brackets.
It works like this:
var my_obj = {};
my_obj[5] = 'any value';
console.log(my_obj); // {5: 'any value'}
JS will not add any redundant undefined to missing indexes either so when looping over the collection you won't loop over undefined.
Also, I can access the object by using the key as a string or as number so you won't have to check if the key is the right type. Taken from the above example:
console.log(my_obj['5']); // 'any value'
console.log(my_obj[5]); // 'any value'
JS Objects are the equivelant of PHP assoc arrays except JS objects are much more flexible than PHP's associative arrays.
The only downside to this is that you can't have duplicate keys.
No two keys may exist that share the same name, in an array if you .push(an_item) it will create a new index making even a duplicate data entry unique but when overwriting a key with a new value only the last value will persist, mind that :)
I have the following requirement. I have a pair of integers which is to act as keys and another pair of integers which should act as values. That is:
obj[{key1:12,key2:23}]=[2,3];
obj[{key1:12,key2:22}]=[4,3];
obj[{key1:34,key2:12}]=[4,33];
Also finally when the population of this list is over, I would like to sequentially access the elements of the object/array.
Now it is my understanding that for such arrays which take an object as key, they are known as associative arrays and Javascript doesn't support them..
The following will be the operations I will perform on this structure :
Insertion: I will have keys like (2,3) or (2,4) which I would like to insert into the array with a new keyvalue pair such as [1,2],
Lookup : I may have a key pair like (2,3) which is already inserted into this array and I would like to get it back so that I can modify it.
That is something like:
if(obj[{key1:2,key2:3}])
obj[{key1:2,key2:3}]=[2,5];
else
obj[{key1:2,key2:3}]=[2,-1];
Any suggestions as to how I can implement this in Javascript?
EDIT: These are the two things I tried:
First I made it as an array of objects. This approach didn't work because from looking around, I knew that in such cases, Javascript will call the toString method to get the string equivalent of the object which it will then use an index.
Second, I tried to do an object with object keys containing sub-objects. Something along the lines of this answer: Answer. However I am not sure how to get sequential access to all the elements after I am done with the insertion phase.
You're probably not going to like this much, but it'll at least give you a stable key:
obj[JSON.stringify({key1:12,key2:23})]=[2,3];
So, the big problem is that in an object the 'key' (really, the 'property') must be a string, or be able to be stringified. In your examples, {key1:12,key2:23} will always be stringified to [object Object]. So you'll never get a unique key. The only way to get that unique key is to really serialize it, such as by using the JSON.stringify method.
Note that on IE8 I think you have to include a JSON class.
Here is an object oriented way to do it:
// Constructor
function AssociativeArray() {
this.length = 0;
}
// Add or set value
AssociativeArray.prototype.set = function(key, value) {
key = key.key1+'|'+key.key2;
if(!this[key]) {
this.length++;
}
this[key] = value;
};
// Lookup
AssociativeArray.prototype.get = function(key) {
return this[key.key1+'|'+key.key2];
};
AssociativeArray.prototype.toString = function() {
var k, arr = [];
for(k in this) {
if(this.hasOwnProperty(k) && k !== 'length') {
arr.push(this[k]);
}
}
return arr;
};
// Create Associative Array
var arr = new AssociativeArray();
// empty array
console.log(arr.toString(), 'length='+arr.length); // [] length=0
// add value
arr.set({key1:1, key2:2}, [1,1]);
console.log(arr.toString(), 'length='+arr.length); // [[1,1]] length=1
// add value
arr.set({key1:2, key2:1}, [2,2]);
console.log(arr.toString(), 'length='+arr.length); // [[1,1], [2,2]] length=2
// set value
arr.set({key1:2, key2:1}, [3,3]);
console.log(arr.toString(), 'length='+arr.length); // [[1,1], [3,3]] length=2
// lookup and set
if(arr.get({key1:2, key2:3})) {
arr.set({key1:2, key2:3}, [2,5]);
} else {
arr.set({key1:2, key2:3}, [2,-1]);
}
console.log(arr.toString(), 'length='+arr.length); // [[1, 1], [3, 3], [2, -1]] length=3
Fiddle here: http://jsbin.com/ohOwala/3/edit
You could use a bidimensional array
var arr = [];
arr[2] = [];
arr[2][3] = [1, 2];
Or you could use an object and access the pairs using the object properties names
obj = {
_2_3: [1, 2],
_2_1: [4, 1],
_1_2: [3, 2]
};
and access them like this obj["_2_3"] or this obj._2_3
or maybe you could nest em
obj = {
_1: {
_2: [2,1]
}
};
so you could access them like this obj["_1"]["_2"]
or maybe this
obj = {
1: {
2: [2,1]
}
};
But you will be forced to use associatve array notation obj["1"]["2"]
and as far as i know using the associative array like way for accessing objects properties isnt a good practice
I asked where the objects {key1:2,key3:2} came from because if you have control over it you can implement a toString method for those types that will take care of the Object to string conversion so it can be used as a property name.
//define keypair object type
var MyKeyPair = function(key1,key2){
this.key1=key1;
this.key2=key2;
};
//define tostring for this type
// later obj[aKeyPairInstance] will
// invoke the toString method
// if you don't do this then [Object object]
// would be returned for toString
MyKeyPair.prototype.toString=function(){
//since you know there is only going to be key1 and key2
// you could just:
// return this.key1+":"+this.key2;
//Here follows a more general approach but it'll cost
// you more cpu time, if working with very large amounts
// of data use the shorter version.
var ret=[];
for(thing in this){
if(this.hasOwnProperty(thing)){
ret.push(thing);
ret.push(":");
ret.push(this[thing]);
ret.push(",");
}
}
return ret.join("");
};
// make a bunch of keyPair objects
var keys = [
new MyKeyPair(21,33),
new MyKeyPair(22,34),
new MyKeyPair(23,35),
new MyKeyPair(24,36)
];
//create an object and give it properties
// based on the tostring value of the keypairs
var obj={};
for(var i = 0,len=keys.length;i<len;i++){
obj[keys[i]]=[keys[i].key1,keys[i].key2];
};
console.log(obj);//<=this would not log any usefull info in IE
//Use Chrome, Firefox, Opera or any other browser instead
I am trying to set up an array in jQuery and I then need to do a for loop on it. But it seems that I cant use an associative array for some reason?
var items = new Array();
items['foo'] = 123456;
items['bar'] = 789012;
items['baz'] = 345678;
items['bat'] = 901234;
alert(items.length);
This is just a test, but it return 0?
You can't make associative array in JavaScript like what you want, instead you can use Object.
For example:
var items = {
foo : 123456,
bar : 789012,
baz : 345678,
bat : 901234
}
And to calculate the length you can do:
var getObjectSize = function(obj) {
var len = 0, key;
for (key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) len++;
}
return len;
};
Use: getObjectSize(items); // output: 4
For more see here.
Another one is:
Object.keys(items).length;
But not supported by all browsers.
var items = new Array();
items['foo'] = 123456;
The problem lies in the very first line. You believe that you are adding an item to the array at the index foo, but you are actually adding a property to the items variable with a key foo and value 123456. If you were to type items.foo it would give you back your 123456.
The problem with this approach is that adding a property to an array does not magically increase it's length.
If you want to have non-numeric indexes, you need to use an object instead of an array:
var items = {
foo: 123456,
bar: 789012,
baz: 345678,
bat: 901234
};
Another approach might be to set up two different arrays, which you construct in parallel:
var items = [], items2 = [];
items.push('foo');
items2.push(123456);
// etc.
alert(items2.length);
The efficiency of this approach depends on how you'll use it. If you're only going to loop through the list of items and do something to each of them, this approach may be more efficient. But if you need to use it like an associative array (items['foo']), then you're better off building an object.
The .length property returns the highest numerical index of the array. Thus, in your case, there is no numerical index and it returns 0. Try
items[98] = "something";
items.length will be 98..! Use the .length property with caution, and if you also want to count the non-numerical indici, loop over the Object (an Array is also an Object) and count its ownProperties.