Related
I need to perform filter in the array of objects to get all the keys. Although, whenever there is a obj inside of that key, I would need to get the key name and concat with the key name from the obj, so for example:
const data = [ id: 5, name: "Something", obj: { lower: True, higher: False } ]
result = ["id", "name", "obj.lower", "obj.higher"]
I could manage to do the above code, but, if there is more objs inside the data, I would need to keep adding a if condition inside of my logic, I would like to know if there is any other way, so it doesn't matter how many objects I have inside the objects, It will concat always.
The code I used from the above mention:
const itemsArray = [
{ id: 1, item: "Item 001", obj: { name: 'Nilton001', message: "Free001", obj2: { test: "test001" } } },
{ id: 2, item: "Item 002", obj: { name: 'Nilton002', message: "Free002", obj2: { test: "test002" } } },
{ id: 3, item: "Item 003", obj: { name: 'Nilton003', message: "Free003", obj2: { test: "test003" } } },
];
const csvData = [
Object.keys(itemsArray[0]),
...itemsArray.map(item => Object.values(item))
].map(e => e.join(",")).join("\n")
// Separating keys
let keys = []
const allKeys = Object.entries(itemsArray[0]);
for (const data of allKeys) {
if (typeof data[1] === "object") {
const gettingObjKeys = Object.keys(data[1]);
const concatingKeys = gettingObjKeys.map((key) => data[0] + "." + key);
keys.push(concatingKeys);
} else {
keys.push(data[0])
}
}
//Flating
const flattingKeys = keys.reduce((acc, val: any) => acc.concat(val), []);
What I would like to achieve, lets suppose I have this array of object:
const data =
[
{ id: 10, obj: {name: "Name1", obj2: {name2: "Name2", test: "Test"}}}
...
]
Final result = ["id", "obj.name", "obj.obj2.name2", "obj.obj2.test"]
OBS: The first obj contains all the keys I need, no need to loop through other to get KEYS.
I would like to achieve, all the keys from the first object of the array, and if there is objects inside of objects, I would like to concat the obj names (obj.obj2key1)
You could map the key or the keys of the nested objects.
const
getKeys = object => Object
.entries(object)
.flatMap(([k, v]) => v && typeof v === 'object'
? getKeys(v).map(s => `${k}.${s}`)
: k
),
getValues = object => Object
.entries(object)
.flatMap(([k, v]) => v && typeof v === 'object'
? getValues(v)
: v
),
data = { id: 1, item: "Item 001", obj: { name: 'Nilton001', message: "Free001", obj2: { test: "test001" } } },
keys = getKeys(data),
values = getValues(data);
console.log(keys);
console.log(values);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
something like this
const itemsArray = [
{ id: 1, item: "Item 001", obj: { name: 'Nilton001', message: "Free001", obj2: { test: "test001" } } },
{ id: 2, item: "Item 002", obj: { name: 'Nilton002', message: "Free002", obj2: { test: "test002" } } },
{ id: 3, item: "Item 003", obj: { name: 'Nilton003', message: "Free003", obj2: { test: "test003" } } },
];
const item = itemsArray[0];
const getAllKeys = (obj, prefix=[]) => {
if(typeof obj !== 'object'){
return prefix.join('.')
}
return Object.entries(obj).flatMap(([k, v]) => getAllKeys(v, [...prefix, k]))
}
console.log(getAllKeys(item))
The OP solution can be simplified by accepting a prefix param (the parent key) and a results param (defaulted to [] and passed into the recursion) to do the flattening...
let obj = { key0: 'v0', key1: { innerKey0: 'innerV0', innerInner: { deeplyNested: 'v' } }, key2: { anotherInnerKey: 'innerV' } }
function recursiveKeys(prefix, obj, result=[]) {
let keys = Object.keys(obj);
keys.forEach(key => {
if (typeof obj[key] === 'object')
recursiveKeys(key, obj[key], result);
else
result.push(`${prefix}.${key}`)
});
return result;
}
console.log(recursiveKeys('', obj))
function getKeys(obj) {
return Object.keys((typeof obj === 'object' && obj) || {}).reduce((acc, key) => {
if (obj[key] && typeof obj[key] === 'object') {
const keys = getKeys(obj[key]);
keys.forEach((k) => acc.add(`${key}.${k}`));
} else {
acc.add(key);
}
return acc;
}, new Set());
}
// accumulate the keys in a set (the items of the array may
// have different shapes). All of the possible keys will be
// stored in a set
const s = itemsArray.reduce(
(acc, item) => new Set([...acc, ...getKeys(item)]),
new Set()
);
console.log('Keys => ', Array.from(s));
You can use recursion as follows. Since typeof([1,3,5]) is object, we also have to confirm that value is not an array, !Array.isArray(value):
const obj = { id: 10, obj: {name: "Name1", obj2: {name2: "Name2", test: "Test"}}};
const getKeys = (o,p) => Object.entries(o).flatMap(([key,value]) =>
typeof(value) === 'object' && !Array.isArray(value) ?
getKeys(value, (p?`${p}.`:"") + key) :
(p ? `${p}.`: "") + key
);
console.log( getKeys(obj) );
I am looking for an efficient way of sorting the API response which is array of Objects. This Array has many fields and I just want to sort only few of them.
The Array looks like this
result = {type: Array(), status: Array(), nature: Array(), health: Array(), fitness: Array(), wealth: Array()}
and Array have name and value property like {name:"", value:""}
so let's say I just need to sort type, status, and nature out of this result. The thing that I have tried now looks like this which juts sorts one of the records.
const typeName = "type"
if(result[typeName]){
result[typeName] = sortingFunction(result[typeName], "name")
}
Now I need to sort other fields as well and also for few fields I need to sort on the basis of "value" property as well.
So please let me know if you have any efficient way of doing this.
You could create a sort function which can sort the given input object for the given keys.
I have create a sample function for sorting.
This function has two parameters.
First the object which needs to be sorted
Second option, you can pass the option for sort.
a. sortBy: Name of the property on which the function will perform the sort .
b. sortKeys: Array | String, the keys/key of the object which need to be sorted.
Function:
function sortObject(input, options = {}) {
if (!options)
return;
let keys = options.sortKeys;
let sortBy = options.sortby
if (!sortBy) {
console.error("sort by option is not defiend");
return;
}
if (!keys) {
console.error("sort keys are not defiend");
return;
}
if (Array.isArray(keys) && keys.length > 0) {
keys.forEach(item => sortObjectByKey(item, sortBy));
return;
}
if (typeof keys === "string" && keys) {
sortObjectByKey(keys, sortBy);
return;
}
function sortObjectByKey(sortKey, sortBy) {
input[sortKey].sort(function (a, b) {
let _a = (typeof a[sortBy] === "string") ? a[sortBy].toLowerCase() : a[sortBy];
let _b = (typeof b[sortBy] === "string") ? b[sortBy].toLowerCase() : b[sortBy];
if (_a < _b)
return -1
if (_a > _b)
return 1
return 0
});
}
}
Example:
//sortObject(sampleObject, { sortby: ["name", "value"], sortKeys: ["status", "type"] });
function sortObject(input, options = {}) {
if (!options)
return;
let keys = options.sortKeys;
let sortBy = options.sortby
if (!sortBy) {
console.error("sort by option is not defiend");
return;
}
if (!keys) {
console.error("sort keys are not defiend");
return;
}
if (Array.isArray(keys) && keys.length > 0) {
keys.forEach(item => sortObjectByKey(item, sortBy));
return;
}
if (typeof keys === "string" && keys) {
sortObjectByKey(keys, sortBy);
return;
}
function sortObjectByKey(sortKey, sortBy) {
input[sortKey].sort(function (a, b) {
let _a = (typeof a[sortBy] === "string") ? a[sortBy].toLowerCase() : a[sortBy];
let _b = (typeof b[sortBy] === "string") ? b[sortBy].toLowerCase() : b[sortBy];
if (_a < _b)
return -1
if (_a > _b)
return 1
return 0
});
}
}
let sampleObject = {
type: [
{ name: "c", value: 4 },
{ name: "a", value: 2 },
{ name: "b", value: 1 },
{ name: "d", value: 3 },
],
status: [
{ name: "c", value: 25 },
{ name: "a", value: 25 },
{ name: "b", value: 25 },
{ name: "d", value: 25 },
],
nature: [
{ name: "c", value: 25 },
{ name: "a", value: 25 },
{ name: "b", value: 25 },
{ name: "d", value: 25 },
],
}
sortObject(sampleObject, { sortby: "value", sortKeys: ["type"] });
sortObject(sampleObject, { sortby: "name", sortKeys: ["status", "nature"] });
console.log(sampleObject)
One way is to translate the object of arrays into an array of objects, then merge it back after sorting.
const result = {
type: ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'],
status: [4, 3, 5],
nature: ['forest', 'animal', 'water'],
health: ['athlete', 'couch potato', 'dead'],
fitness: [200, 50, 60],
wealth: [5, 2, 99]
};
// 1. combine
const combined = result.type.map((_, index) => {
return Object.fromEntries(Object.keys(result).map(key => [key, result[key][index]]));
});
// 2. example sort by status
combined.sort((a, b) => a.status - b.status)
// 3. merge
combined.forEach((object, index) => {
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object)) {
result[key][index] = value
}
})
console.log(result);
Using JS i am trying to rename canBook -> quantity, variationsEN -> variations and nested keys valueEN -> value
var prod = [{
price: 10,
canBook: 1
}, {
price: 11,
canBook: 2,
variationsEN: [{
valueEN: 1
}, {
valueEN: 2
}]
}]
I was able to rename keys, but i dont have a clue how to rename the nested ones: valueEN
prod.map(p => ({
quantity: p.canBook, variations:p.variationsEN
}))
Just apply the same trick again. Replace:
variations:p.variationsEN
with:
variations:(p.variationsEN || []).map(q => ({ value: q.valueEN }))
The additional || [] is to deal with cases where the property does not exist in your source object. In that case an empty array is produced for it.
You could take a recursiv approach with an object for the renamed properties and build new object or arrays.
function rename(value) {
if (!value || typeof value !== 'object') return value;
if (Array.isArray(value)) return value.map(rename);
return Object.fromEntries(Object
.entries(value)
.map(([k, v]) => [keys[k] || k, rename(v)])
);
}
var keys = { canBook: 'quantity', variationsEN: 'variations', valueEN: 'value' },
prod = [{ price: 10, canBook: 1 }, { price: 11, canBook: 2, variationsEN: [{ valueEN: 1 }, { valueEN: 2 }] }],
result = rename(prod);
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
If it's indeed a JSON (as your tag seems to indicate), e.g. you get it as string from a server, you can use a reviver function, such as:
var prod = JSON.parse(prodJSON, function (k, v) {
if (k === "canBook") {
this["quantity"] = v
} else {
return v
}
});
(Of course you could always stringify in case you start from a JS Object and not from a JSON string, but in that case it would be an overkill)
variations:p.variationsEN.map(q => { value: q.valueEN })
The bigger problem I am trying to solve is, given this data:
var data = [
{ id: 1 },
{ id: 2 },
{ id: 3 },
{ id: 4, children: [
{ id: 6 },
{ id: 7, children: [
{id: 8 },
{id: 9 }
]}
]},
{ id: 5 }
]
I want to make a function findById(data, id) that returns { id: id }. For example, findById(data, 8) should return { id: 8 }, and findById(data, 4) should return { id: 4, children: [...] }.
To implement this, I used Array.prototype.find recursively, but ran into trouble when the return keeps mashing the objects together. My implementation returns the path to the specific object.
For example, when I used findById(data, 8), it returns the path to { id: 8 }:
{ id: 4, children: [ { id: 6 }, { id: 7, children: [ { id: 8}, { id: 9] } ] }
Instead I would like it to simply return
{ id: 8 }
Implementation (Node.js v4.0.0)
jsfiddle
var data = [
{ id: 1 },
{ id: 2 },
{ id: 3 },
{ id: 4, children: [
{ id: 6 },
{ id: 7, children: [
{id: 8 },
{id: 9 }
]}
]},
{ id: 5 }
]
function findById(arr, id) {
return arr.find(a => {
if (a.children && a.children.length > 0) {
return a.id === id ? true : findById(a.children, id)
} else {
return a.id === id
}
})
return a
}
console.log(findById(data, 8)) // Should return { id: 8 }
// Instead it returns the "path" block: (to reach 8, you go 4->7->8)
//
// { id: 4,
// children: [ { id: 6 }, { id: 7, children: [ {id: 8}, {id: 9] } ] }
The problem what you have, is the bubbling of the find. If the id is found inside the nested structure, the callback tries to returns the element, which is interpreted as true, the value for the find.
The find method executes the callback function once for each element present in the array until it finds one where callback returns a true value. [MDN]
Instead of find, I would suggest to use a recursive style for the search with a short circuit if found.
var data = [{ id: 1 }, { id: 2 }, { id: 3 }, { id: 4, children: [{ id: 6 }, { id: 7, children: [{ id: 8 }, { id: 9 }] }] }, { id: 5 }];
function findById(data, id) {
function iter(a) {
if (a.id === id) {
result = a;
return true;
}
return Array.isArray(a.children) && a.children.some(iter);
}
var result;
data.some(iter);
return result
}
console.log(findById(data, 8));
Let's consider the implementation based on recursive calls:
function findById(tree, nodeId) {
for (let node of tree) {
if (node.id === nodeId) return node
if (node.children) {
let desiredNode = findById(node.children, nodeId)
if (desiredNode) return desiredNode
}
}
return false
}
Usage
var data = [
{ id: 1 }, { id: 2 }, { id: 3 },
{ id: 4, children: [
{ id: 6 },
{ id: 7,
children: [
{ id: 8 },
{ id: 9 }
]}]},
{ id: 5 }
]
findById(data, 7 ) // {id: 7, children: [{id: 8}, {id: 9}]}
findById(data, 5 ) // {id: 5}
findById(data, 9 ) // {id: 9}
findById(data, 11) // false
To simplify the picture, imagine that:
you are the monkey sitting on the top of a palm tree;
and searching for a ripe banana, going down the tree
you are in the end and searches aren't satisfied you;
come back to the top of the tree and start again from the next branch;
if you tried all bananas on the tree and no one is satisfied you, you just assert that ripe bananas don't grow on this this palm;
but if the banana was found you come back to the top and get pleasure of eating it.
Now let's try apply it to our recursive algorithm:
Start iteration from the top nodes (from the top of the tree);
Return the node if it was found in the iteration (if a banana is ripe);
Go deep until item is found or there will be nothing to deep. Hold the result of searches to the variable (hold the result of searches whether it is banana or just nothing and come back to the top);
Return the searches result variable if it contains the desired node (eat the banana if it is your find, otherwise just remember not to come back down by this branch);
Keep iteration if node wasn't found (if banana wasn't found keep testing other branches);
Return false if after all iterations the desired node wasn't found (assert that ripe bananas doesn't grow on this tree).
Keep learning recursion it seems not easy at the first time, but this technique allows you to solve daily issues in elegant way.
I would just use a regular loop and recursive style search:
function findById(data, id) {
for(var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
if (data[i].id === id) {
return data[i];
} else if (data[i].children && data[i].children.length && typeof data[i].children === "object") {
findById(data[i].children, id);
}
}
}
//findById(data, 4) => Object {id: 4, children: Array[2]}
//findById(data, 8) => Object {id: 8}
I know this is an old question, but as another answer recently revived it, I'll another version into the mix.
I would separate out the tree traversal and testing from the actual predicate that we want to test with. I believe that this makes for much cleaner code.
A reduce-based solution could look like this:
const nestedFind = (pred) => (xs) =>
xs .reduce (
(res, x) => res ? res : pred(x) ? x : nestedFind (pred) (x.children || []),
undefined
)
const findById = (testId) =>
nestedFind (({id}) => id == testId)
const data = [{id: 1}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}, {id: 4, children: [{id: 6}, {id: 7, children: [{id: 8}, {id: 9}]}]}, {id: 5}]
console .log (findById (8) (data))
console .log (findById (4) (data))
console .log (findById (42) (data))
.as-console-wrapper {min-height: 100% !important; top: 0}
There are ways we could replace that reduce with an iteration on our main list. Something like this would do the same:
const nestedFind = (pred) => ([x = undefined, ...xs]) =>
x == undefined
? undefined
: pred (x)
? x
: nestedFind (pred) (x.children || []) || nestedFind (pred) (xs)
And we could make that tail-recursive without much effort.
While we could fold the two functions into one in either of these, and achieve shorter code, I think the flexibility offered by nestedFind will make other similar problems easier. However, if you're interested, the first one might look like this:
const findById = (id) => (xs) =>
xs .reduce (
(res, x) => res ? res : x.id === id ? x : findById (id) (x.children || []),
undefined
)
const data = [
{ id: 1 },
{ id: 2 },
{ id: 3 },
{
id: 4,
children: [{ id: 6 }, { id: 7, children: [{ id: 8 }, { id: 9 }] }]
},
{ id: 5 }
];
// use Array.flatMap() and Optional chaining to find children
// then Filter undefined results
const findById = (id) => (arr) => {
if (!arr.length) return null;
return (
arr.find((obj) => obj.id === id) ||
findById(id)(arr.flatMap((el) => el?.children).filter(Boolean))
);
};
const findId = (id) => findById(id)(data);
console.log(findId(12)); /* null */
console.log(findId(8)); /* { id: 8 } */
Based on Purkhalo Alex solution,
I have made a modification to his function to be able to find the ID recursively based on a given dynamic property and returning whether the value you want to find or an array of indexes to recursively reach to the object or property afterwards.
This is like find and findIndex together through arrays of objects with nested arrays of objects in a given property.
findByIdRecursive(tree, nodeId, prop = '', byIndex = false, arr = []) {
for (let [index, node] of tree.entries()) {
if (node.id === nodeId) return byIndex ? [...arr, index] : node;
if (prop.length && node[prop].length) {
let found = this.findByIdRecursive(node[prop], nodeId, prop, byIndex, [
...arr,
index
]);
if (found) return found;
}
}
return false;
}
Now you can control the property and the type of finding and get the proper result.
This can be solved with reduce.
const foundItem = data.reduce(findById(8), null)
function findById (id) {
const searchFunc = (found, item) => {
const children = item.children || []
return found || (item.id === id ? item : children.reduce(searchFunc, null))
}
return searchFunc
}
You can recursively use Array.prototype.find() in combination with Array.prototype.flatMap()
const findById = (a, id, p = "children", u) =>
a.length ? a.find(o => o.id === id) || findById(a.flatMap(o => o[p] || []), id) : u;
const tree = [{id:1}, {id:2}, {id:3}, {id:4, children:[{id: 6}, {id:7, children:[{id:8}, {id:9}]}]}, {id:5}];
console.log(findById(tree, 9)); // {id:9}
console.log(findById(tree, 10)); // undefined
If one wanted to use Array.prototype.find this is the option I chose:
findById( my_big_array, id ) {
var result;
function recursiveFind( haystack_array, needle_id ) {
return haystack_array.find( element => {
if ( !Array.isArray( element ) ) {
if( element.id === needle_id ) {
result = element;
return true;
}
} else {
return recursiveFind( element, needle_id );
}
} );
}
recursiveFind( my_big_array, id );
return result;
}
You need the result variable, because without it, the function would return the top level element in the array that contains the result, instead of a reference to the deeply nested object containing the matching id, meaning you would need to then filter it out further.
Upon looking through the other answers, my approach seems very similar to Nina Scholz's but instead uses find() instead of some().
Here is a solution that is not the shortest, but divides the problem into recursive iteration and finding an item in an iterable (not necessarily an array).
You could define two generic functions:
deepIterator: a generator that traverses a forest in pre-order fashion
iFind: a finder, like Array#find, but that works on an iterable
function * deepIterator(iterable, children="children") {
if (!iterable?.[Symbol.iterator]) return;
for (let item of iterable) {
yield item;
yield * deepIterator(item?.[children], children);
}
}
function iFind(iterator, callback, thisArg) {
for (let item of iterator) if (callback.call(thisArg, item)) return item;
}
// Demo
var data = [{ id: 1 }, { id: 2 }, { id: 3 }, { id: 4, children: [{ id: 6 }, { id: 7, children: [{ id: 8 }, { id: 9 }] }] }, { id: 5 }];
console.log(iFind(deepIterator(data), ({id}) => id === 8));
In my opinion, if you want to search recursively by id, it is better to use an algorithm like this one:
function findById(data, id, prop = 'children', defaultValue = null) {
for (const item of data) {
if (item.id === id) {
return item;
}
if (Array.isArray(item[prop]) && item[prop].length) {
const element = this.findById(item[prop], id, prop, defaultValue);
if (element) {
return element;
}
}
}
return defaultValue;
}
findById(data, 2);
But I strongly suggest using a more flexible function, which can search by any key-value pair/pairs:
function findRecursive(data, keyvalues, prop = 'children', defaultValue = null, _keys = null) {
const keys = _keys || Object.keys(keyvalues);
for (const item of data) {
if (keys.every(key => item[key] === keyvalues[key])) {
return item;
}
if (Array.isArray(item[prop]) && item[prop].length) {
const element = this.findRecursive(item[prop], keyvalues, prop, defaultValue, keys);
if (element) {
return element;
}
}
}
return defaultValue;
}
findRecursive(data, {id: 2});
you can use this function:
If it finds the item so the item returns. But if it doesn't find the item, tries to find the item in sublist.
list: the main/root list
keyName: the key that you need to find the result up to it for example 'id'
keyValue: the value that must be searched
subListName: the name of 'child' array
callback: your callback function which you want to execute when item is found
function recursiveSearch(
list,
keyName = 'id',
keyValue,
subListName = 'children',
callback
) {
for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
const x = list[i]
if (x[keyName] === keyValue) {
if (callback) {
callback(list, keyName, keyValue, subListName, i)
}
return x
}
if (x[subListName] && x[subListName].length > 0) {
const item = this.recursiveSearch(
x[subListName],
keyName,
keyValue,
subListName,
callback
)
if (!item) continue
return item
}
}
},
Roko C. Buljan's solution, but more readable one:
function findById(data, id, prop = 'children', defaultValue = null) {
if (!data.length) {
return defaultValue;
}
return (
data.find(el => el.id === id) ||
findById(
data.flatMap(el => el[prop] || []),
id
)
);
}
I want to compare 2 arrays of objects in JavaScript code. The objects have 8 total properties, but each object will not have a value for each, and the arrays are never going to be any larger than 8 items each, so maybe the brute force method of traversing each and then looking at the values of the 8 properties is the easiest way to do what I want to do, but before implementing, I wanted to see if anyone had a more elegant solution. Any thoughts?
As serialization doesn't work generally (only when the order of properties matches: JSON.stringify({a:1,b:2}) !== JSON.stringify({b:2,a:1})) you have to check the count of properties and compare each property as well:
const objectsEqual = (o1, o2) =>
Object.keys(o1).length === Object.keys(o2).length
&& Object.keys(o1).every(p => o1[p] === o2[p]);
const obj1 = { name: 'John', age: 33};
const obj2 = { age: 33, name: 'John' };
const obj3 = { name: 'John', age: 45 };
console.log(objectsEqual(obj1, obj2)); // true
console.log(objectsEqual(obj1, obj3)); // false
If you need a deep comparison, you can call the function recursively:
const obj1 = { name: 'John', age: 33, info: { married: true, hobbies: ['sport', 'art'] } };
const obj2 = { age: 33, name: 'John', info: { hobbies: ['sport', 'art'], married: true } };
const obj3 = { name: 'John', age: 33 };
const objectsEqual = (o1, o2) =>
typeof o1 === 'object' && Object.keys(o1).length > 0
? Object.keys(o1).length === Object.keys(o2).length
&& Object.keys(o1).every(p => objectsEqual(o1[p], o2[p]))
: o1 === o2;
console.log(objectsEqual(obj1, obj2)); // true
console.log(objectsEqual(obj1, obj3)); // false
Then it's easy to use this function to compare objects in arrays:
const arr1 = [obj1, obj1];
const arr2 = [obj1, obj2];
const arr3 = [obj1, obj3];
const arraysEqual = (a1, a2) =>
a1.length === a2.length && a1.every((o, idx) => objectsEqual(o, a2[idx]));
console.log(arraysEqual(arr1, arr2)); // true
console.log(arraysEqual(arr1, arr3)); // false
EDIT: You cannot overload operators in current, common browser-based implementations of JavaScript interpreters.
To answer the original question, one way you could do this, and mind you, this is a bit of a hack, simply serialize the two arrays to JSON and then compare the two JSON strings. That would simply tell you if the arrays are different, obviously you could do this to each of the objects within the arrays as well to see which ones were different.
Another option is to use a library which has some nice facilities for comparing objects - I use and recommend MochiKit.
EDIT: The answer kamens gave deserves consideration as well, since a single function to compare two given objects would be much smaller than any library to do what I suggest (although my suggestion would certainly work well enough).
Here is a naïve implemenation that may do just enough for you - be aware that there are potential problems with this implementation:
function objectsAreSame(x, y) {
var objectsAreSame = true;
for(var propertyName in x) {
if(x[propertyName] !== y[propertyName]) {
objectsAreSame = false;
break;
}
}
return objectsAreSame;
}
The assumption is that both objects have the same exact list of properties.
Oh, and it is probably obvious that, for better or worse, I belong to the only-one-return-point camp. :)
Honestly, with 8 objects max and 8 properties max per object, your best bet is to just traverse each object and make the comparisons directly. It'll be fast and it'll be easy.
If you're going to be using these types of comparisons often, then I agree with Jason about JSON serialization...but otherwise there's no need to slow down your app with a new library or JSON serialization code.
I know this is an old question and the answers provided work fine ... but this is a bit shorter and doesn't require any additional libraries ( i.e. JSON ):
function arraysAreEqual(ary1,ary2){
return (ary1.join('') == ary2.join(''));
}
I have worked a bit on a simple algorithm to compare contents of two objects and return an intelligible list of difference. Thought I would share. It borrows some ideas for jQuery, namely the map function implementation and the object and array type checking.
It returns a list of "diff objects", which are arrays with the diff info. It's very simple.
Here it is:
// compare contents of two objects and return a list of differences
// returns an array where each element is also an array in the form:
// [accessor, diffType, leftValue, rightValue ]
//
// diffType is one of the following:
// value: when primitive values at that index are different
// undefined: when values in that index exist in one object but don't in
// another; one of the values is always undefined
// null: when a value in that index is null or undefined; values are
// expressed as boolean values, indicated wheter they were nulls
// type: when values in that index are of different types; values are
// expressed as types
// length: when arrays in that index are of different length; values are
// the lengths of the arrays
//
function DiffObjects(o1, o2) {
// choose a map() impl.
// you may use $.map from jQuery if you wish
var map = Array.prototype.map?
function(a) { return Array.prototype.map.apply(a, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1)); } :
function(a, f) {
var ret = new Array(a.length), value;
for ( var i = 0, length = a.length; i < length; i++ )
ret[i] = f(a[i], i);
return ret.concat();
};
// shorthand for push impl.
var push = Array.prototype.push;
// check for null/undefined values
if ((o1 == null) || (o2 == null)) {
if (o1 != o2)
return [["", "null", o1!=null, o2!=null]];
return undefined; // both null
}
// compare types
if ((o1.constructor != o2.constructor) ||
(typeof o1 != typeof o2)) {
return [["", "type", Object.prototype.toString.call(o1), Object.prototype.toString.call(o2) ]]; // different type
}
// compare arrays
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(o1) == "[object Array]") {
if (o1.length != o2.length) {
return [["", "length", o1.length, o2.length]]; // different length
}
var diff =[];
for (var i=0; i<o1.length; i++) {
// per element nested diff
var innerDiff = DiffObjects(o1[i], o2[i]);
if (innerDiff) { // o1[i] != o2[i]
// merge diff array into parent's while including parent object name ([i])
push.apply(diff, map(innerDiff, function(o, j) { o[0]="[" + i + "]" + o[0]; return o; }));
}
}
// if any differences were found, return them
if (diff.length)
return diff;
// return nothing if arrays equal
return undefined;
}
// compare object trees
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(o1) == "[object Object]") {
var diff =[];
// check all props in o1
for (var prop in o1) {
// the double check in o1 is because in V8 objects remember keys set to undefined
if ((typeof o2[prop] == "undefined") && (typeof o1[prop] != "undefined")) {
// prop exists in o1 but not in o2
diff.push(["[" + prop + "]", "undefined", o1[prop], undefined]); // prop exists in o1 but not in o2
}
else {
// per element nested diff
var innerDiff = DiffObjects(o1[prop], o2[prop]);
if (innerDiff) { // o1[prop] != o2[prop]
// merge diff array into parent's while including parent object name ([prop])
push.apply(diff, map(innerDiff, function(o, j) { o[0]="[" + prop + "]" + o[0]; return o; }));
}
}
}
for (var prop in o2) {
// the double check in o2 is because in V8 objects remember keys set to undefined
if ((typeof o1[prop] == "undefined") && (typeof o2[prop] != "undefined")) {
// prop exists in o2 but not in o1
diff.push(["[" + prop + "]", "undefined", undefined, o2[prop]]); // prop exists in o2 but not in o1
}
}
// if any differences were found, return them
if (diff.length)
return diff;
// return nothing if objects equal
return undefined;
}
// if same type and not null or objects or arrays
// perform primitive value comparison
if (o1 != o2)
return [["", "value", o1, o2]];
// return nothing if values are equal
return undefined;
}
I tried JSON.stringify() and worked for me.
let array1 = [1,2,{value:'alpha'}] , array2 = [{value:'alpha'},'music',3,4];
JSON.stringify(array1) // "[1,2,{"value":"alpha"}]"
JSON.stringify(array2) // "[{"value":"alpha"},"music",3,4]"
JSON.stringify(array1) === JSON.stringify(array2); // false
There is a optimized code for case when function needs to equals to empty arrays (and returning false in that case)
const objectsEqual = (o1, o2) => {
if (o2 === null && o1 !== null) return false;
return o1 !== null && typeof o1 === 'object' && Object.keys(o1).length > 0 ?
Object.keys(o1).length === Object.keys(o2).length &&
Object.keys(o1).every(p => objectsEqual(o1[p], o2[p]))
: (o1 !== null && Array.isArray(o1) && Array.isArray(o2) && !o1.length &&
!o2.length) ? true : o1 === o2;
}
Here is my attempt, using Node's assert module + npm package object-hash.
I suppose that you would like to check if two arrays contain the same objects, even if those objects are ordered differently between the two arrays.
var assert = require('assert');
var hash = require('object-hash');
var obj1 = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 333},
obj2 = {b: 2, a: 1, c: 444},
obj3 = {b: "AAA", c: 555},
obj4 = {c: 555, b: "AAA"};
var array1 = [obj1, obj2, obj3, obj4];
var array2 = [obj3, obj2, obj4, obj1]; // [obj3, obj3, obj2, obj1] should work as well
// calling assert.deepEquals(array1, array2) at this point FAILS (throws an AssertionError)
// even if array1 and array2 contain the same objects in different order,
// because array1[0].c !== array2[0].c
// sort objects in arrays by their hashes, so that if the arrays are identical,
// their objects can be compared in the same order, one by one
var array1 = sortArrayOnHash(array1);
var array2 = sortArrayOnHash(array2);
// then, this should output "PASS"
try {
assert.deepEqual(array1, array2);
console.log("PASS");
} catch (e) {
console.log("FAIL");
console.log(e);
}
// You could define as well something like Array.prototype.sortOnHash()...
function sortArrayOnHash(array) {
return array.sort(function(a, b) {
return hash(a) > hash(b);
});
}
My practice implementation with sorting, tested and working.
const obj1 = { name: 'John', age: 33};
const obj2 = { age: 33, name: 'John' };
const obj3 = { name: 'John', age: 45 };
const equalObjs = ( obj1, obj2 ) => {
let keyExist = false;
for ( const [key, value] of Object.entries(obj1) ) {
// Search each key in reference object and attach a callback function to
// compare the two object keys
if( Object.keys(obj2).some( ( e ) => e == key ) ) {
keyExist = true;
}
}
return keyExist;
}
console.info( equalObjs( obj1, obj2 ) );
Compare your arrays
// Sort Arrays
var arr1 = arr1.sort(( a, b ) => {
var fa = Object.keys(a);
var fb = Object.keys(b);
if (fa < fb) {
return -1;
}
if (fa > fb) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
});
var arr2 = arr2.sort(( a, b ) => {
var fa = Object.keys(a);
var fb = Object.keys(b);
if (fa < fb) {
return -1;
}
if (fa > fb) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
});
const equalArrays = ( arr1, arr2 ) => {
// If the arrays are different length we an eliminate immediately
if( arr1.length !== arr2.length ) {
return false;
} else if ( arr1.every(( obj, index ) => equalObjs( obj, arr2[index] ) ) ) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
console.info( equalArrays( arr1, arr2 ) );
I am sharing my compare function implementation as it might be helpful for others:
/*
null AND null // true
undefined AND undefined // true
null AND undefined // false
[] AND [] // true
[1, 2, 'test'] AND ['test', 2, 1] // true
[1, 2, 'test'] AND ['test', 2, 3] // false
[undefined, 2, 'test'] AND ['test', 2, 1] // false
[undefined, 2, 'test'] AND ['test', 2, undefined] // true
[[1, 2], 'test'] AND ['test', [2, 1]] // true
[1, 'test'] AND ['test', [2, 1]] // false
[[2, 1], 'test'] AND ['test', [2, 1]] // true
[[2, 1], 'test'] AND ['test', [2, 3]] // false
[[[3, 4], 2], 'test'] AND ['test', [2, [3, 4]]] // true
[[[3, 4], 2], 'test'] AND ['test', [2, [5, 4]]] // false
[{x: 1, y: 2}, 'test'] AND ['test', {x: 1, y: 2}] // true
1 AND 1 // true
{test: 1} AND ['test', 2, 1] // false
{test: 1} AND {test: 1} // true
{test: 1} AND {test: 2} // false
{test: [1, 2]} AND {test: [1, 2]} // true
{test: [1, 2]} AND {test: [1]} // false
{test: [1, 2], x: 1} AND {test: [1, 2], x: 2} // false
{test: [1, { z: 5 }], x: 1} AND {x: 1, test: [1, { z: 5}]} // true
{test: [1, { z: 5 }], x: 1} AND {x: 1, test: [1, { z: 6}]} // false
*/
function is_equal(x, y) {
const
arr1 = x,
arr2 = y,
is_objects_equal = function (obj_x, obj_y) {
if (!(
typeof obj_x === 'object' &&
Object.keys(obj_x).length > 0
))
return obj_x === obj_y;
return Object.keys(obj_x).length === Object.keys(obj_y).length &&
Object.keys(obj_x).every(p => is_objects_equal(obj_x[p], obj_y[p]));
}
;
if (!( Array.isArray(arr1) && Array.isArray(arr2) ))
return (
arr1 && typeof arr1 === 'object' &&
arr2 && typeof arr2 === 'object'
)
? is_objects_equal(arr1, arr2)
: arr1 === arr2;
if (arr1.length !== arr2.length)
return false;
for (const idx_1 of arr1.keys())
for (const idx_2 of arr2.keys())
if (
(
Array.isArray(arr1[idx_1]) &&
this.is_equal(arr1[idx_1], arr2[idx_2])
) ||
is_objects_equal(arr1[idx_1], arr2[idx_2])
)
{
arr2.splice(idx_2, 1);
break;
}
return !arr2.length;
}
Please try this one:
function used_to_compare_two_arrays(a, b)
{
// This block will make the array of indexed that array b contains a elements
var c = a.filter(function(value, index, obj) {
return b.indexOf(value) > -1;
});
// This is used for making comparison that both have same length if no condition go wrong
if (c.length !== a.length) {
return 0;
} else{
return 1;
}
}
The objectsAreSame function mentioned in #JasonBunting's answer works fine for me. However, there's a little problem: If x[propertyName] and y[propertyName] are objects (typeof x[propertyName] == 'object'), you'll need to call the function recursively in order to compare them.
not sure about the performance ... will have to test on big objects .. however, this works great for me.. the advantage it has compared to the other solutions is, the objects/array do not have to be in the same order ....
it practically takes the first object in the first array, and scans the second array for every objects .. if it's a match, it will proceed to another
there is absolutely a way for optimization but it's working :)
thx to #ttulka I got inspired by his work ... just worked on it a little bit
const objectsEqual = (o1, o2) => {
let match = false
if(typeof o1 === 'object' && Object.keys(o1).length > 0) {
match = (Object.keys(o1).length === Object.keys(o2).length && Object.keys(o1).every(p => objectsEqual(o1[p], o2[p])))
}else {
match = (o1 === o2)
}
return match
}
const arraysEqual = (a1, a2) => {
let finalMatch = []
let itemFound = []
if(a1.length === a2.length) {
finalMatch = []
a1.forEach( i1 => {
itemFound = []
a2.forEach( i2 => {
itemFound.push(objectsEqual(i1, i2))
})
finalMatch.push(itemFound.some( i => i === true))
})
}
return finalMatch.every(i => i === true)
}
const ar1 = [
{ id: 1, name: "Johnny", data: { body: "Some text"}},
{ id: 2, name: "Jimmy"}
]
const ar2 = [
{name: "Jimmy", id: 2},
{name: "Johnny", data: { body: "Some text"}, id: 1}
]
console.log("Match:",arraysEqual(ar1, ar2))
jsfiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/x1pubs6q/
or just use lodash :))))
const _ = require('lodash')
const isArrayEqual = (x, y) => {
return _.isEmpty(_.xorWith(x, y, _.isEqual));
};
using _.some from lodash: https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.11#some
const array1AndArray2NotEqual =
_.some(array1, (a1, idx) => a1.key1 !== array2[idx].key1
|| a1.key2 !== array2[idx].key2
|| a1.key3 !== array2[idx].key3);
There`s my solution. It will compare arrays which also have objects and arrays. Elements can be stay in any positions.
Example:
const array1 = [{a: 1}, {b: 2}, { c: 0, d: { e: 1, f: 2, } }, [1,2,3,54]];
const array2 = [{a: 1}, {b: 2}, { c: 0, d: { e: 1, f: 2, } }, [1,2,3,54]];
const arraysCompare = (a1, a2) => {
if (a1.length !== a2.length) return false;
const objectIteration = (object) => {
const result = [];
const objectReduce = (obj) => {
for (let i in obj) {
if (typeof obj[i] !== 'object') {
result.push(`${i}${obj[i]}`);
} else {
objectReduce(obj[i]);
}
}
};
objectReduce(object);
return result;
};
const reduceArray1 = a1.map(item => {
if (typeof item !== 'object') return item;
return objectIteration(item).join('');
});
const reduceArray2 = a2.map(item => {
if (typeof item !== 'object') return item;
return objectIteration(item).join('');
});
const compare = reduceArray1.map(item => reduceArray2.includes(item));
return compare.reduce((acc, item) => acc + Number(item)) === a1.length;
};
console.log(arraysCompare(array1, array2));
This is work for me to compare two array of objects without taking into consideration the order of the items
const collection1 = [
{ id: "1", name: "item 1", subtitle: "This is a subtitle", parentId: "1" },
{ id: "2", name: "item 2", parentId: "1" },
{ id: "3", name: "item 3", parentId: "1" },
]
const collection2 = [
{ id: "3", name: "item 3", parentId: "1" },
{ id: "2", name: "item 2", parentId: "1" },
{ id: "1", name: "item 1", subtitle: "This is a subtitle", parentId: "1" },
]
const contains = (arr, obj) => {
let i = arr.length;
while (i--) {
if (JSON.stringify(arr[i]) === JSON.stringify(obj)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
const isEqual = (obj1, obj2) => {
let n = 0
if (obj1.length !== obj2.length) {
return false;
}
for (let i = 0; i < obj1.length; i++) {
if (contains(obj2, obj1[i])) {
n++
}
}
return n === obj1.length
}
console.log(isEqual(collection1,collection2))
if you take into consideration the order of the items use built in function in lodash isEqual
comparing with json is pretty bad. try this package to compare nested arrays and get the difference.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/deep-object-diff
If you stringify them...
type AB = {
nome: string;
}
const a: AB[] = [{ nome: 'Célio' }];
const b: AB[] = [{ nome: 'Célio' }];
console.log(a === b); // false
console.log(JSON.stringify(a) === JSON.stringify(b)); // true