So, i have a script that creates a global object
(function() {
window.GlobalThing = {}
})();
This script will also fill this object attributes
if (!GlobalThing .Resource) { GlobalThing .Resource = require('./Resource'); }
Then, some other scripts that are not bundled with webpack need to use this GlobalThing. I`ve tryed to make it global using ProvidePlugin for example:
plugins: [
new webpack.ProvidePlugin({
$: "jquery",
jQuery: "jquery",
"window.jQuery": "jquery",
'GlobalThing': path.join(__dirname,"Path/GlobalThing.js")
})
],
I've tryed adding an Alias as well
resolve: {
alias: {
'GlobalThing': path.join(__dirname,"Path/GlobalThing.js")
}
}
I have tryed doing something like this in the end of my GlobalThing.js file as well:
(function(){
window.GlobalThing = GlobalThing;
})();
Then i had to import to run the script, so i got a random js file inside the webpack to test it:
import GlobalThing from "GlobalThing ";
Still, it seems some scripts cannot seethe GlobalThing. If i bundle everything up with webpack, it works, but i didnt want to as our app is very old and have some very old stuff. Is there a way i can expose GlobalThing to those older scripts ?
ProvidePlugin takes a module name (i.e. string) and internally uses require to load it. So that wont help you in loading your own script.
That said, following should work:
Keep the GlobalThing script out of webpack bundling
Make sure the script itself is copied to the output folder
Make sure the index.html (or whatever html page you are using) has the scripts in the order GlobalThingScript.js followed by webpack bundle.js
To give you more insight:
When webpack bundles the scripts other than GlobalThingScript.js, it doesnt even know there is something called GlobalThing. It just bundles the other files.
That would mean it is upto you to make sure the GlobalThingScript.js is also made it to the final output folder. Also, the html source should use <script> tags to include the GlobalThingScript.js before webpack bundle.js.
In case problem persists, please do edit the OP to include the html source.
Hope that helps.
Related
I am building a new project in Rails 6. I have a front-end library I want to use (#tarekraafat/autocomplete.js) that is installed by yarn and exists in my node_modules directory, but is not being made available to other JS code in the browser. Here is what I have set up currently:
/package.json:
"dependencies": {
"#tarekraafat/autocomplete.js": "^8.2.1"
}
/app/javascript/packs/application.js:
import "#tarekraafat/autocomplete.js/dist/js/autoComplete.min.js"
/app/views/.../example.html.erb
<script type="text/javascript">
window.onload = () => {
new autoComplete({
[...]
});
};
</script>
I am getting an error in the browser pointing to the new autoComplete():
Uncaught ReferenceError: autoComplete is not defined
Some reading seems to indicate that I need to modify the /config/webpack/environment.js file, in which I have tried various versions of the following with no luck (including restarting the dev server):
/config/webpack/environment.js:
const { environment } = require('#rails/webpacker')
const webpack = require('webpack')
environment.plugins.prepend('Provide',
new webpack.ProvidePlugin({
autoComplete: 'autocomplete.js'
})
);
module.exports = environment
First, what do I need to do to add this library so it can be used correctly? Second, as someone who has not directly used webpack previously, what is the function of adding this definition to the environments.js file, and why don't I need to do it for some libraries (bootstrap, popper) but I do for others (jquery, and maybe autocomplete.js)?
In Webpacker, the usage of this library would be as follows:
// app/javascript/src/any_file.js
import autoComplete from "#tarekraafat/autocomplete"
new autoComplete(...)
// app/javascript/packs/application.js
import "../src/any_file"
This alone does not import the autoComplete variable into the global scope. To do that, the simplest thing is assign the variable to window from within your webpack dependency graph.
// app/javascript/src/any_file.js
import autoComplete from "#tarekraafat/autocomplete"
window.autoComplete = autoComplete
As an aside, you don't need to use the ProvidePlugin configuration for this library. The ProvidePlugin says: “add this import to all files in my dependency graph.” This might be helpful for something like jQuery to make legacy jQuery plugins work in webpack. It is not necessary to make your autocomplete lib work
Good time of the day,
Recently I've been trying to implement dynamic module loading functionality for my project. However, I'm failing for past few hours. To give you an idea of what I'm trying to achieve, here is the structure of the project
plugins
developer
assets
scss
developer.scss
js
developer.js
themes
theme_name
webpack.mix.js
node_modules/
source
js
application.js
bootstrap.js
scss
application.scss
_variables.scss
So, in order to get the available plugins, I've made the following function
/**
* Get all plugins for specified developer
* which have 'assets' folder
* #param developerPath
* #param plugins
*/
function getDeveloperPlugins(developerPath, plugins) {
if (fs.existsSync(developerPath)) {
fs.readdirSync(developerPath).forEach(entry => {
let pluginPath = path.resolve(developerPath, entry),
assetsPath = path.resolve(pluginPath, 'assets');
if (fs.existsSync(assetsPath))
plugins[entry] = assetsPath;
});
}
}
This function loads all the available plugins for the specified developer, then goes inside and looks for the assets folder, if it exists, then it returns it and we can work with the provided directory later.
The next step is to generate the reference for every plugin (direct path to the developer_name.js file) which later should be 'mixed' into one plugins.bundle.js file.
In order to achieve this, the following piece of code 'emerged'
_.forEach(plugins, (directory, plugin) => {
let jsFolder = path.resolve(directory, 'js'),
scssFolder = path.resolve(directory, 'scss');
if (fs.existsSync(jsFolder)) {
webpackModules.push(jsFolder);
let possibleFile = path.resolve(jsFolder, plugin + '.js');
if (fs.existsSync(possibleFile))
pluginsBundle.js[plugin] = possibleFile;
}
if (fs.existsSync(scssFolder)) {
webpackModules.push(scssFolder);
let possibleFile = path.resolve(scssFolder, plugin + '.scss');
if (fs.existsSync(possibleFile))
pluginsBundle.scss[plugin] = possibleFile;
}
});
And the last step before I'm starting to edit the configuration of the Webpack is to get the folders for both scss and js files for all plugins and all developers:
let jsPluginsBundle = _.values(pluginsBundle.js),
scssPluginsBundle = _.values(pluginsBundle.scss);
And here is where the problems start to appear. I've tried many solutions offered either here on GitHub (in respective repositories), but I've failed so many times.
The only error I'm having now is this one:
ERROR in F:/Web/Projects/TestProject/plugins/developer/testplugin/assets/js/testplugin.js
Module build failed: ReferenceError: Unknown plugin "transform-object-rest-spread" specified in "base" at 0, attempted to resolve relative to "F:\\Web\\Projects\\TestProject\\plugins\\developer\\testplugin\\assets\\js"
Yes, i know that webpack.mix.js file should be in the root folder of the project, however, i'm just developing theme, which uses modules developed by other members of the team.
So, idea was to:
Start build process: npm run dev|prod
Load plugins for all needed developers automatically
Use methods and html tags provided by the plugin (it is a mix of PHP for API routing and Vue.js for Components, etc) as follows: <test-component></test-component>
Any help is really appreciated, i just cant get my head around that error. If you need extra information, i'm ready to help since i myself need help to solve this issue =)
Update: The latest Webpack config used by mix.webpackConfig() (still failing though)
let webpackConfiguration = {
module: {
rules: [{
test: /\.js$/,
exclude: /(node_modules|bower_components)/,
use: {
loader: require.resolve('babel-loader'),
options: {
presets: [
'babel-preset-env'
].map(require.resolve),
plugins: [
'babel-plugin-transform-object-rest-spread'
].map(require.resolve)
}
}
}]
},
resolve: {
modules: webpackModules
}
};
mix.webpackConfig(webpackConfiguration);
And this is the content of the webpackModules variable:
[
'F:\\Web\\Projects\\TestProject\\themes\\testtheme\\node_modules',
'F:\\Web\\Projects\\TestProject\\themes\\testtheme',
'F:\\Web\\Projects\\TestProject\\plugins\\developer\\testplugin\\assets\\js',
'F:\\Web\\Projects\\TestProject\\plugins\\developer\\testplugin\\assets\\scss'
]
Okay, after 7 hours I've decided to try the most obvious method to solve the problem, to create node_modules folder in the root of the project and install laravel-mix there, and it worked like a charm.
Looks like, if it cant find the module in the directory outside the root scope of the Webpack, it will go up the tree to find the node_modules folder.
Developers should allow us to set the root folder for Webpack to fetch all the modules i guess, but well, problem is solved anyways.
Hi I'm trying to make starting template for SPA project mainly using:
RequireJS, KnockoutJS, TypeScript, etc.
I'm having hard time figuring out how to configure paths and folder structure for RequireJS to work properly...
here is my folder structure:
Scripts
app
components
main.js
lib
knockout.js
jquery.js
here is my RequireJS config file:
var config = {
waitSeconds: 15,
paths: {
app: '../app',
'knockout': '/lib/knockout-3.4.2.',
sammy: '/lib/sammy-0.7.5.',
jquery: '../scripts/lib/jquery-1.10.2.'
}
};
This is my attempt for main.js:
define(['jquery', 'PageOne', 'PageTwo'], function ($, pageOne, pageTwo) {
$(document).ready(function () {
var app = Sammy('#main', function () {
this.get('#/pageOne', function () {
pageOne.activate();
});
this.get('#/pageTwo', function () {
pageTwo.activate();
});
});
app.run();
});
});
Here is my Index.cshtml script tag:
<script src="~/Scripts/lib/require.js" data-main="scripts/app/components/main"></script>
I saw in different project that config is called in header so this is in html header:
<script src="~/Scripts/app/config/require.config.js"></script>
My problem is that in main.js it looks for jquery under path defined in data-main (scripts/app/components/), but my jquery is in scripts/lib folder.
I'm trying to figure out by reading online the whole day but it's too much time for me I need someone to give me some hints how is this supposed to work?
Seriously having hard time figuring this out and RequireJS website just isn't helping me atm.
Note: I am beginner in JavaScript based projects, first SPA attempt,
never used RequireJS...
Your configuration file does not do anything. I'm assuming from your description that the script element that loads it is located before the script element that loads RequireJS. That's one valid way to configure RequireJS, but if you want RequireJS to pick up the configuration, you need to set the global variable require before you load RequireJS, and RequireJS will use the value of require as its configuration. Right now you are setting config, which is ignored by RequireJS. So:
var require = {
waitSeconds: 15,
// etc...
And once the configuration is in effect, you should be able to reduce your data-main to data-main="components/main".
I see some of your paths in the paths configuration end with a dot. That's most likely a mistake on your part, or you have some very strange file names.
Can someone maybe explain me, how this build-time require works?
https://github.com/kriasoft/react-starter-kit/blob/feature/redux/src/server.js#L89
They are requiring a jade template, which package or configuration allows this, I seem unable to find it myself.
const template = require('./views/index.jade')
I think is much more elegant then:
import jade from 'jade'
const template = jade.compile('./views/index.jade')
As RGraham mentioned in his comment, the require call is being "intercepted" during webpack's compilation of the application bundle. This is done using "loaders" that define particular behaviour for imports of a particular type:
Loaders allow you to preprocess files as you require() or “load” them.
In this particular case, the loader that does this modification could be one of these (or another that I didn't find in my search):
https://github.com/bline/jade-html-loader
https://github.com/webpack/jade-loader
Edit: looking at the project's own webpack configuration we can see it is the second link above:
{
test: /\.jade$/,
loader: 'jade-loader',
}
jade-loader reads the content of the specified file, which make look something like this (Jade string):
h1 Hello, #{author}!
..and replaces that with a CommonJS JavaScript code similar to this (at compile time):
module.exports = function(data) {
return `<h1>Hello, ${data.name}</h1>`;
};
I know in RequireJS, we can use define() to define a module with dependencies.
The things I got confused is such chunk code in jQuery.
// ready.js
define([
"../core",
"../core/init",
"../deferred"
], function( jQuery ) {
// ...
})
Actually I can not figure out the dependencies with "../core" and "../core/init",
as RequireJS says,
RequireJS also assumes by default that all dependencies are scripts, so it does not expect to see a trailing ".js" suffix on module IDs.
But there isn't a file called ../core.js, just a ../core directory.
So is ../core dependency needless?
You're right, you don't have to specify folders as dependencies, only scripts that you want to load.
// ready.js
define([
"../core/init",
"../deferred"
], function(init, deferred) {
// ...
});
And to say more, RequireJS does not even allow you to mark the entire folder as a dependency.