Good day,
I dont know if am can explain this well for you to help but i will like to use a an ES6 class to create an object that can be called like this.
var = varaibles
obj = objects
obj.var
obj.var.method
obj.var.var.method
obj.method.var
and so on.
I can only do one step
obj.var && obj.method
i will kind appreciate if one can help me here thanks
this is what i have done
class Table extends someClass {
constructor() {
super();
this.column = {
sort: () => {
console.log("firing");
},
resize: () => {
console.log("firing");
}
};
this.cells = {
edit: () => {
console.log("firing");
}
};
}
myMethods() {
//BLAH
}
}
From what I understood, here is my solution.
If I return a object full of methods, I can use that object as I like.
class someClass {
// this is a parent method
Parent() {
console.log(`From a Parent`)
}
// a getter that returns an object
get parentWithChild() {
return {
child() {
console.log(`From a Child`)
}
}
}
// a function that returns an object
Methods() {
return {
child() {
console.log(`From a Child`)
}
}
}
}
const cool = new someClass();
cool.Parent(); // From a Parent
cool.parentWithChild.child(); // From a Child
cool.Methods().child(); // From a Child
You can use similar pattern on the extended class too.
Related
I would like to convert a function that return multiple functions, into a class with a constructor that should be called only with the new keyword.
I tried this :
const toast = () => {
return ({
getToast: () => {
return 'toast'
},
setToast: () => {
return 'wtf'
}
})
}
class t {
constructor() {}
}
const t1 = t.bind(toast())
const tt = new t1()
console.log(tt.getToast)
But it print undefined.
I also tried Object.assign(t, toast()), or doing simply this = toast() in the constructor but it doesn't work.
I do not know what are you trying to do. May be you are looking for this.
const toast = () => {
return ({
getToast: () => {
return 'toast'
},
setToast: () => {
return 'wtf'
}
})
}
class t {
constructor(fn) {
return fn;
}
}
const tt = new t(toast())
console.log(tt.getToast())
console.log(tt.setToast())
For your exact scenario, that is if the function returns an object with only functions and no non-function properties, one way to do this is simply using prototype inheritance:
function t () {}; // though by convention a class should REALLY be uppercase
t.prototype = toast();
Now you can do:
let bread = new t();
let bagel = new t();
bread.getToast();
bagel.getToast();
You can also use a design pattern called parasitic inheritance but this is less memory efficient because just like the toast() function it creates a copy of the functions for each object:
class t {
constructor () {
let tmp = toast();
// Copy methods to our instance:
for (let prop in tmp) {
this[prop] = tmp[prop];
}
}
}
Or with Object.assign() it would simply be:
class t {
constructor () {
Object.assign(this, toast());
}
}
However, as mentioned, the prototype inheritance is the better mechanism for this use-case.
Hi guys I'm a newbie in JS and I'd like to know how to call an array of a different class inside another function that belongs to the same javascript class.
Here is the sample code:
class Something {
constructor () {}
async functionA () {
this.list = []
}
async functionB () {
console.log(this.list)
}
}
In the constructor you can declare your variables with this.variableName and then other class methods will be able to get and set the value. You can also access it from an instance of the class.
class Something {
constructor() {
this.list = []
}
async functionA () {
this.list = [ 'foo', 'bar']
}
async functionB () {
console.log(this.list)
}
}
What you're doing seems to work fine...
class Something {
constructor () {}
async functionA () {
this.list = ['ok']
}
async functionB () {
console.log(this.list)
}
}
const a = new Something();
a.functionA();
a.functionB();
https://codepen.io/benaloney/pen/dyPpELK
I am playing with ES6 classes and to better manage an array property of the class, I replaced the array with an object and added all the array-related functions (get, add, remove, etc) along with an array sub-property:
class MyClass {
constructor () {
this.date_created = new Date()
}
posts = {
items: [],
get: () => {
return this.posts.items
},
add: (value) => this.posts.items.unshift(value),
remove: (index) => this.posts.items.splice(index, 1)
}
}
So it got me thinking: is there a way to setup that posts object to return the items array by default? i.e. through: MyClass.posts
I thought I could trick it with the get() but didn't work.
If you want to keep the actual array hidden and untouchable except through the methods, it has to be declared in the constructor. Any function that alters it has to be declared in the constructor as well. If that item is to be publicly accessible, it has to be attached to this.
class Post extends Array
{
add(val)
{
this.unshift(val);
}
remove()
{
this.shift();
}
}
class MyClass
{
constructor()
{
this.date_created = new Date()
this.post = new Post();
}
}
let x = new MyClass();
console.log(x.post);
x.post.add(2);
console.log(x.post);
class MyClass {
constructor() {
this.post = [];
}
get post() {
return [1,2,3]
}
set post(val) {
}
}
let someClass = new MyClass();
console.log(someClass.post)
I believe the correct syntax is something as above. your getter and setter is pointing to post, where post is only a variable/key of MyClass, hence your getter and setter should be at MyClass level
i have this class
import { ObjectUtilities } from '~/utils/';
class Object{
constructor(object) {
Object.assign(this, { ...object });
}
utils = ObjectUtilities;
}
and this class with the statis method also (class contains many static methods)
class ObjectUtilities {
static getKey(object){
return object.key;
}
}
and i want to know if its possible to share the "this" from the Object class
to the static method "getKey(object)"
want to do it as:
let x = new Object(object);
x.utils.getkey(this);
(ObjectUtilities as many static funcs i dont want to do it for each of them)
thanks for helping me out...
You can add a constructor to the ObjectUtilities class where you bind the given context to the getKey function:
class ObjectUtilities {
constructor(_this) {
this.getKey = this.getKey.bind(_this);
}
getKey() {
return this.key;
}
}
class MyObject {
constructor(object) {
Object.assign(this, { ...object });
this.utils = new ObjectUtilities(this);
}
}
const objectFoo = { key: 'foo' };
const objectBar = { key: 'bar' };
let x = new MyObject(objectFoo);
let y = new MyObject(objectBar);
console.log(x.utils.getKey(), y.utils.getKey());
I have this simple class:
class Foo {
constructor() {
this.init();
return this;
}
init() {
this.onInit();
}
onInit(callback) {
this.onInit = () => callback();
return this;
}
}
new Foo().onInit(() => console.log('baz'));
It's obviously flawed, because it will call init before the onInit method is able to define the onInit property/callback.
How can I make this work without change the interface?
How can I make this work without change the interface?
You can't, the interface is inherently flawed. That's really the answer to your question.
Continuing, though, with "what can I do instead":
If you need to have a callback called during initialization, you need to pass it to the constructor, not separately to the onInit method.
class Foo {
constructor(callback) {
this.onInit = () => {
callback(); // Call the callback
return this; // Chaining seemed important in your code, so...
};
// Note: Constructors don't return anything
}
}
new Foo(() => console.log('baz'));
In a comment you've said:
I see your point, the fact is that my library is new Something().onCreate().onUpdate()
It sounds like you might want to adopt the builder pattern instead:
class Foo {
constructor(callbacks) {
// ...use the callbacks here...
}
// ...
}
Foo.Builder = class {
constructor() {
this.callbacks = {};
}
onCreate(callback) {
this.callbacks.onCreate = callback;
}
onUpdate(callback) {
this.callbacks.onUpdate = callback;
}
// ...
build() {
// Validity checks here, do we have all necessary callbacks?
// Then:
return new Foo(this.callbacks);
}
};
let f = new Foo.Builder().onCreate(() => { /*...*/}).onUpdate(() => { /*... */}).build();
...although to be fair, a lot of the advantages (though not all) of the builder pattern can be realized in JavaScript by just passing an object into constructor directly and doing your validation there, e.g.:
let f = new Foo({
onCreate: () => { /*...*/},
onUpdate: () => { /*...*/}
});
Assuming that onInit is supposed to be some sort of hook to be called synchronously whenever an object is instantiated, you can't solve this on the instance level.
You can make onInit a static function, like so:
class Foo {
constructor() {
// whatever
Foo.onInit();
}
static onInit() {} // empty default
}
Foo.onInit = () => console.log('baz'); // Override default with your own function
const f = new Foo();
const f2 = new Foo();