I know this is a duplicated question.
And below link is the answer the most nearest with my question that I've found.
CSS overflow-x: visible; and overflow-y: hidden; causing scrollbar issue
In this link, the W3C spec says:
The computed values of ‘overflow-x’ and ‘overflow-y’ are the same as
their specified values, except that some combinations with ‘visible’
are not possible: if one is specified as ‘visible’ and the other is
‘scroll’ or ‘auto’, then ‘visible’ is set to ‘auto’. The computed
value of ‘overflow’ is equal to the computed value of ‘overflow-x’ if
‘overflow-y’ is the same; otherwise it is the pair of computed values
of ‘overflow-x’ and ‘overflow-y’.
What I want to know is, are there any new solution of this.
The problem of mine is in this fiddle.
I made 'sidebar' class of 'BootStrap' simple in a fiddle of mine.
overflow-x: visible;
//overflow-y: scroll;
You can see that I commented out 'overflow-y: scroll' of class '.panel' in css part.
In this case, 'hover' will work but 'scroll' won't.
When if I clear that comment out, 'hover' won't work but 'scroll' will.
What I wanna see is, 'hover' and 'scroll' working together.
Does anyone have any ways or ideas to fix this?
Or are there still no way to solve this problem?
Your code is working you just can't see hover because of the width you set to that block is 50px also if you set position:absolute in hover you can see that hover effect but it overlap the child item. so one thing i want to know you want same width or you just set for a demo purpose.
You could use jQuery so you will change the .panel overflow depending on the event.
Absolutely you will need a little of css hacks also,
See the updated JSfiddle.
I liked this question.
So, I have created a fiddle here: https://jsfiddle.net/n4tvvora/4/
Its comes pretty close to what you need (I think). Let me know if it does NOT suit your requirement. We can make it better.
Code highlights:
.panel:hover ul.list:first-child {
position: absolute;
display: inline-block;
height: 100%;
width: auto;
overflow-y: auto;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
.panel ul.list:first-child {
display: block;
}
I've solved this by adding 'div' between 'div' and 'ul'.
And here's my final fiddle which works almost fitting with my intent.
<div class="panel"> // added div
I hope this working will be helpful for anybody. :)
Related
I have
<div class="slide slick-slide slick-current slick-active" data-slick-index="0"
aria-hidden="false" style="width: 1730px; position: relative; left: 0px; top:
0px; z-index: 999; opacity: 1;" tabindex="0" role="tabpanel" id="slick-slide00" aria-describedby="slick-slide-control00">
I want to remove z-index, I tried
jQuery(document).ready(function( $ ){
jQuery('.slick-slide).css('z-index', "");
});
and
jQuery(document).ready(function( $ ){
jQuery('.slick-slide).css('z-index', "auto");
});
and I tried all the classes listed in the div above, nothing worked. I just want to remove the z-index, it's a wordpress site, so using JS/JQuery are my only options.
You don't need jQuery - use Element.style.removeProperty():
document.querySelector(".slick-slide").style.removeProperty("z-index");
As requested per comments above:
Simply override .slick-slide in your CSS with !important, no JavaScript required.
.slick-slide {
z-index: 0 !important;
}
Edit:
0 is simply a placeholder, choose a value you see fit or set to initial for the default value of z-index.
If you only have z-index as inline and want to remove it you should remove the whole style attribute instead.
`$('.slick-slide').removeAttr('style');`
I see that you are using Slick Slider. I recommend not to delete any styles served by Slick. Better to write an ugly override with some CSS instead.
I'm adding my own answer but cannot accept it since I'm not sure it's the right answer.
The better solution is to set the parent div that you created
.example-banner {
z-index: 0;
}
And leave slick slider as is, that would fix the issue too. The difference is that if you do like the accepted answer suggested, like I suggested previously, you'll face an issue which is that if you click on any href, it will take you to the last href of the slider.
So lets say your slider has 5 slides and each slide has a link to an article, when you click on any of those links, you'd be taken to the last article.
This is an issue on Firefox and IE so far that I've tested; the problem does not exist on Chrome.
I'm including two TinyMCE editors on a page with one partially off-screen to start. When I select the color picker dropdown option from the toolbar on the first TinyMCE instance, the dropdown appears where it should. But if I scroll down and select the color picker dropdown in the second instance, that dropdown appears way below the editor and typically off the page.
You can see this in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/nm6wtca3/
Without removing the html, body CSS, what can I do to have the color picker always appear in the correct position?
I've traced the problem down to setting CSS on the html, body elements.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
The dropdown div has CSS applied to it that is auto-calculated by TinyMCE. It looks something like this:
z-index: 65535;
left: 641.467px;
top: 633px;
width: 162px;
height: 105px;
How it appears in FF (sometimes way worse):
How it appears in Chrome (how it should look):
You did say you don't want to remove any CSS from the html,body, but you didn't say anything about adding to it! This solution is based on the assumption that you can add to the html,body
Solution
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
position: relative; /* Line added */
}
JSFiddle Example
I hope this helps. In all reality, you really only need to apply position: relative; to the body like so body { position: relative; }
I'm not super familiar with tinymce's colorpicker, but I can see the issue, and I can replicate it reliably: your problem occurs when you have a picker open, and then you scroll. I can replicate this in chrome too. Here's a video.
When I look at the DOM, I see that tinyMCE has created two absolute-positioned divs at the end of document.body, one for each picker. When you open one, their position is updated to reflect the location of the toolbar-button at the time you clicked it, but it never gets updated when you scroll!
So, how to solve this? Well, there are a few possibilities:
Option 1: it looks like tinyMCE provides a method to bind a control to an event (here). With this, you could bind a callback to 'scroll' that repositions the box...
Huh, now that I think of it, you could simply close any open colorpickers whenever a user scrolls ... kinda feels like a cop-out but there's no denying it has the best R.O.I. ;) We'll call that Option 2!
Option 3: depending on the implementation of the colorpicker, you may be able to override where in the DOM those divs get rendered. The API method I saw that looked the most promising is here. Once you have the div inside a relative-positioned parent, you'd also have to make the colorpicker's positioning algorithm smart enough to look in the right place for x and y offset ...when I tried this by just moving the element and mashing in some css by hand in chrome-console, the algorithm still computed x and y offsets based on doc.body, so depending on where you were scrolled at click-time, everything would be out of position
It looks like this issue might be troubling other people as well... maybe they've found a solution but haven't posted anything about it?
I hope this is enough info to get you past the problem... Let me know if you have any questions!
It looks like the problem is caused by overflow-x: hidden;
It may not be the answer you want but removing that or moving it to a page wrapper will solve your problem.
Working Example
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
#pagewrapper{
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Another option would be to force repositioning on scroll, but honestly this is overkill... I strongly recommend fixing the css instead.
Another working example
$('body').scroll(posfix); // when the body scrolls
$('#mceu_10').click(posfix); // when you click the top font color button
$('#mceu_35').click(posfix); // when you click the bottom font color button
function posfix() {
setTimeout(function () { // hack way to ensure it fires after the menu is shown
$('#mceu_51').css({
top: $('#mceu_10').offset().top + $('#mceu_10').height(), // set top/left based on button's position
left: $('#mceu_10').offset().left + $('#mceu_10').width() / 2
});
$('#mceu_52').css({
top: $('#mceu_35').offset().top + $('#mceu_35').height(),
left: $('#mceu_35').offset().left + $('#mceu_35').width() / 2
});
}, 1);
}
it works on firefox, and Internet Explorer fine
just remove this css code
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Please take a look at this:
html,
body {
width: auto;
height: auto;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
You can simply set body width and height to auto, then there won't be any need to use position and you don't have to remove anything. I think you do not need to use height: 100% since it will be auto-calculated by TinyMCE. i hope it helped.
Update
Look at the screen shot from chrome and its same in firefox. And i didn't remove any css but just changed..and by putting 100% in css the output will be like :-
Please check this one with auto but not 100%..thank you
I have a JQuery autocomplete search box which when displaying the search results in the dropdown window appears behind a JQuery dropdown menu directly below it (see image). I have tried increasing the z-index value of everything I can find in the CSS for the autocomplete search but it still doesn't fix the problem. What else should I be trying?
Fiddle link: http://jsfiddle.net/tonyyeb/LKDBh/18/
Thanks for everyone's contributions. I have since found a solution given to me by a forum user:
The autocomplete wrapper is being given a z-index of 1 by the jQuery library (hard-coded), >whereas the menu (via CSS) has a z-index of 100; easiest solution is to use -
.ui-autocomplete {
z-index: 100 !important;
}
I had a similar issue with a website recently and I've fixed this with the following method:
Make sure that you position both elements absolute OR relative (z-index only works when you use the 'position' css element. So you should either use position: absolute; or postion: relative;. That totally depends on your code/css. When you don't use the position element right now, you should probably use the position: relative; element since the position:absolute; element will position the referring element absolutely which will probably screw up your layout).
Then make sure you give the dropdown a z-index which is lower then the z-index for the menu.
Example
.search-dropdown{
position: relative; or position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
}
.jquery-menu{
position: relative; or position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
}
Now, you've added
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
to .ui-widget.
Remove it there and add it directly to the dropdown's css which appears when you enter something in the input field (Chrome/Firefox: Right Click on the dropdown and inspect element to see its class/ID).
Hope this helps!
A few months ago I had a similar problem, and searched the web.
The solution was in the CSS styling.
I added an inline class (ui-front) to the element that holds the autocomplete input element.
Not sure it will solve your problem, but it's an easy experiment.
Best of luck!
Question has been posted long time ago. Still, i also have a solution that works and not listed till now .
just add this on top of your page and problem should be solved.
.pac-container { position: absolute; cursor: default;z-index:3000 !important;}
If I have a div acting as a container that when empty shows an image, and I want to remove that image when content gets added to the container dynamically, what would be the best Jquery method to accomplish this? Doing the usual -
if ($(".container").html().length <= 0) {
$('.ad').show();
}
does not work in this case since the content being added is dynamic and does not involve a refresh. I tried storing the check in in a setIntercal function that would run every 100ms but the results didn't turn out as expected and it also caused some odd flickering on the page.
EDIT**
Josh Burgess' method would be the one I use in all cases if I didn't have to support IE8. Because of this I'm going to fall back to adding a .hide() method on the when the click event for adding content is fired. Thanks for the help!
Why use jQuery at all?
Try this CSS:
div.myDiv:empty{
background-image: url(path/to/myimage);
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
}
div.myDiv {
background-image: none;
height:auto;
width: auto;
}
--EDIT--
Here's a working example in jsfiddle, and it works in reverse as well
I want to hide scrollbar to appear on a long div,but still able to scroll through mouse or keyboard arrow keys.I read another thread here about scrollable.Tried to use that..but could not implement that...could someone guide me how to implement that clearly or is there any other option with jquery or css?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
I'm not 100% sure on the browser compatibility of this, but you can have two div's - an outer div and a inner div. The inner div will have all your content. Your css could then look like this:
#outer {
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
overflow:hidden;
}
#inner {
height: 200px;
width: 225px;
overflow: scroll;
}
That is, the inner block would be wide enough to contain a scrollbar, but have it hidden from sight by the containing div. This worked for me in webkit. You might have to fiddle with the widths to make sure text doesn't get cut off.
That said, I would carefully think about WHY you're trying to do this. This could be a huge usability issue for your users, as they will not have any indication that there is more content within the div.
To do this is add the following css
.div::-webkit-scrollbar {
display: none;
}
This is saying that hey remove the display of the scroll bar but keep the functionality