I am developing an Angular application that needs photo capturing functionality. For that purpose, I am using WebCam directive by referring following links.
https://github.com/jonashartmann/webcam-directive
https://jonas.hartmann.site/webcam-directive/#/
After developing whole page, I am now stuck unit testing on Edge due to 'Browser does not support getUserMedia' error. After googling for solution, I came across links that says, Edge doesn't have support for getUserMedia.
how to make getUserMedia() work on all browsers
http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/accessing-the-device-camera-with-getusermedia
I think, there will be alternate solution for this scenario but I can't figure it out.
NOTE: webcam.min.js file already used
navigator.getMedia=navigator.getUserMedia||navigator.webkitGetUserMedia||navigator.mozGetUserMedia||navigator.msGetUserMedia
Thanks in advance.
Related
I am looking at trying to scan barcodes from a mobile device.
I been doing some research and I having hard time finding JavaScript libraries that can do this.
I see these projects
zxing
This seems to be no longer in development and just bugs fixes are done?
QuaggaJS
This one, I am not sure if it is development either anymore as changelog is from 2017
quagga2
This seems to be a fork of the one above? So this might be the better choice to go with vs the 2?
What I am trying to achieve is this. I want to go on an andriod device (think phone, maybe tablet), load up chrome or firefox, go to my site click a button and load up the devices camera and scan a bar code (mostly EAN-8/13).
I want to do the same thing on apple devices (iphone and ipad), load up safari (not sure if they got chrome and Firefox on these devices. I don't own apple), click a button and load up their devices cameras and scan a bar code.
I think this is possible in all the libraries I listed above, but I am still unclear if this is possible on apple devices? I read somewhere that before ios 14 it would not be possible?
I am open to other libaries, I can use Jquery, vanilla javascript and I think angular (but I think it is version 3).
Just been doing this same research myself. All of those open source ones you listed seem to be either dead or have performance/reliability issues. Looks like only the commercial versions are really viable at the moment:
Dynamsoft - https://www.dynamsoft.com/store/dynamsoft-barcode-reader/
Scanbot - https://scanbot.io/products/barcode-software/web-barcode-scanner/
There are also two different mobile apps that are viable. These are web apps that just display a browser view and make a barcode scanning function from the app itself available on the page:
https://berrywing.com/scan-to-web-app/
https://www.mochasoft.dk/iphone_barcode2.htm
The second one has a more capable JS API of the two.
UPDATE: I went with that last option from Mochasoft. Turned out quite well.
im trying to create an application with webcam integration, my app only run on Internet Explorer because it manage external device with activeX, months ago i implemented webcamjs library but it works with Adobe Flash Player which is deprecated and now i can't run any flash component in my application.
is there another way to manage webcam on Internet Explorer without Flash?
I try to search but did not get any working example to manage the webcam without using Flash. Some old libraries and APIs are available but they may give inconsistent results with the IE 11 or may not work.
If possible you can try to move to the latest browsers. There you will not have to depend upon Flash.
If you cant move to the latest browsers then you can try to refer to this document. Please check Options for continued support for enterprise customers point. You can try to contact Adobe for Enterprise customer support, they can provide some options that might help to fix your issue.
In HTML 5, the following link has a nice explanation:
https://www.kirupa.com/html5/accessing_your_webcam_in_html5.htm
EDIT: just noticed - you want IE. This is a pity. I would propose rather switch to a state of the art HTML 5 capable browser.
I'm working on HTML5 app that lets several users to work on one document. I need to add a possibility for users (editing the same document) to talk to each other. And I just don't know how to start with that. Here are my questions
Is there an HTML5 lib allowing to transfer sound from microphone between clients?
What about streaming video from camera?
What is an easiest server-side solution for that?
Any thoughts are strongly appreciated! So don't be shy! :)
UPD: please note that I need an abbility for more then two users to talk.
For this you can use WebRTC.
However, this is a very young and unfinished technology that as already stated is currently available only in Chrome stable and Firefox beta. This means there will probably come changes to the current spec, something to be aware of in case of early implementation. But it allow you to use video and audio communication directly in the browser.
Quick-start here:
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/webrtc/basics/
Other options are Flash based plugins such as flash-videoio. This is an open source plugin but will naturally require Adobe Flash installed. This may or may not be a problem depending on the company's security policy.
For technical details on implementation please see examples on the provided links.
For many-to-many you can use either:
"Mesh" - everybody connects to everybody. This however is costly on CPU and mobiles are often left out.
"Star" - everybody goes through the most capable device. However, with many connections this will soon run slow for the device handling all connections.
MCU. Specialized server to handle all connections. If mixes audio and video and handles drop-outs as well without affecting the other callers.
Examples of MCU's:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mcumediaserver/ (open source)
http://www.medooze.com/products/mcu.aspx (commercial)
you are searching for navigator.getUserMedia()
that allows the various users to share video audio and data.
the support is very low... only chrome and the latest verions of opera and firefox support it.
and totally no support on mobile devices... maybe in the next android chrome... dunno
as there is much to talk about and i have no clue on how u wanna setup everything i suggest u read a little more about that on the urls...
http://caniuse.com/stream
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/getusermedia/intro/
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/WebRTC/navigator.getUserMedia
http://my.opera.com/core/blog/2011/03/23/webcam-orientation-preview
http://simpl.info/getusermedia/
and SERVERSIDE solution nahh... thats not a good solution
clientside is the way to go.
Not sure if you're required to do it yourself from scratch or are able to use third party libraries/tools.
In which case I would recommend using Tokbox which has support for WebRTC and SDK for iOS.
Their API is simple and easy to use.
I understand that the best bet when streaming a video as a source in an HTML5 tag would be .mp4. But let's say that I have a source that only outputs fragmented to an ism/manifest.
Is there any way at all, whether through other libraries or messy hacks, that I can bring this video into something rendered as a tag onscreen? The closest I have found is Walkthrough: Building Your First HTML5 Smooth Streaming Player because it allows this to be done - but I neither have Windows 8, or want to have this running a server capable of .NET. I was hoping there was something, messy or not, that I could achieve this with entirely within javascript and executable locally without a deploy.
Thanks
Firstly, W3C does not provide a standard for adaptive bitrate streaming, yet. So for the time being most browsers only support simple progressive download playback.
Hence, there is no JS implementation of a Smooth Streaming player and Microsoft is not working on one, as far as I know.
The example you provide uses the "Microsoft Smooth Streaming Client SDK Beta 2 for Windows 8" which is a C++ library and is only available for Windows Store Apps development. It has nothing to do with browsers.
So, unfortunately this is not yet possible. Even more, I doubt that this will ever happen, because everybody is waiting for MPEG DASH to be finalized.
UPDATE.
Please, notice that you always can use Siverlight application for playing SmoothStreaming. The referenced HTML5 Player framework is capable of falling back to Silverlight.
no luck for Microsoft Smooth Streaming, but regarding MPEG-DASH which is similar (see http://blog.johndeutscher.com/2013/06/10/mpeg-dash-preview-from-windows-azure-media-services):
"Dash.js is permissively licensed (under the BSD license) and can therefore be studied and reused by anyone seeking to provide their own DASH-AVC/264 compliant player. The goal is to make it easier for third-parties to build adaptive streaming video players."
http://msopentech.com/blog/2013/06/20/ms-open-tech-contributes-to-open-source-adaptive-streaming-video-player/
also see:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/media-source/media-source.html
which is required for Dash.js
I know firefox does not support MP4 and I understand the reasons for that. I'm developing an html5 video framework and I strongly prefer firebug to Chrome's debugging tools and because of this, I am very interested if there is any way via extension paid, free or otherwise to add mp4 support to firefox for my personal use.
Anyone know of any tricks?
EDIT:
Clarifying my Question. I am only testing the html5 implementation while the flash implementation is handled separately. This is a widget / CMS driven framework and feature parity is not limited to video, so I have to spend a lot of time in the debugger. A lot of listeners in the video trigger other functionality, leading to very large call stacks. Because of this, debugging in firebug vs chrome isn't trivial for me.
The simple answer is no, however you can fallback to a flash player that supports H.264, this will also ensure compatibility with older browsers.
Microsoft released an extension for Firefox 3.6+, but it requires Windows 7 and doesn't add some kind of native support, but rather causes similar effect as if you'd use <embed> instead of <video>.