Develop Reference

clicks on blazor webpage not being registered after tab reload

I am just getting started with CEF4Delphi. I have a chromium window on a tab in a page control. There are javascript hooks attached to elements on the webpage which register clicks and fire off native delphi code. This is all working correctly on one webpage. I can switch tabs and keep clicking on the webpage and receiving the click events.
However, when loading a different webpage there is some strange behaviour. The first time the tab is loaded clicks will be registered just fine. The issue arises when switching tabs. The second time a tab is loaded there are no clicks being registered.
This second webpage is being created by blazor which is different to the first but I am not sure why that would be affecting it.
I have tested using Google.com and it works fine on there also.
Chromium1.LoadURL('localhost:6064');
is run when the tab is loaded.
class procedure TmyExtension.ButtonClick(const data: string);
var
msg: ICefProcessMessage;
begin
msg := TCefProcessMessageRef.New('ButtonClick');
TCefv8ContextRef.Current.Browser.MainFrame.SendProcessMessage(PID_BROWSER, msg);
end;
The delphi code being fired
Chromium1.browser.MainFrame.ExecuteJavaScript(
'document.getElementById("'+
'NewButton' +
'").addEventListener("click", function(evt){' +
'function getpath(n){var ret = n.id;' +
'if (n.parentNode){return "" + ret}' +
'else return ret};'
'myextension.ButtonClick(getpath(evt.target))' +
'})', Chromium1.browser.MainFrame.GetURL, 0);
The Javascript being executed
procedure TtabWebPage.Chromium1ProcessMessageReceived(Sender: TObject;
const browser: ICefBrowser; const frame: ICefFrame;
sourceProcess: TCefProcessId; const message: ICefProcessMessage;
out Result: Boolean);
begin
if (message = nil) or (message.ArgumentList = nil) then exit;
// This function receives the messages with the JavaScript results
if (message.Name = 'ButtonClick') then begin
Inc(FCount);
Result := True;
end;
inherited;
end;
Receiving the chromium message and increasing a count.
There doesn't seem to be a way to debug whether the javascript is being run. The ExecuteJavaScript function is definitely being run every time the page loads. I am wondering if there is anything to do with the blazor aspect of the webpage that causes this, or if there is any way to debug the issue.

Re-using same instance again webdriverJS

I am really new to Selenium. I managed to open a website using the below nodejs code
var webdriver = require('selenium-webdriver');
var driver = new webdriver.Builder()
.forBrowser('chrome')
.build();
console.log(driver);
driver.get('https://web.whatsapp.com');
//perform all other operations here.
https://web.whatsapp.com is opened and I manually scan a QR code and log in. Now I have different javascript files to perform actions like delete, clear chat inside web.whatsapp.com etc...
Now If I get some error, I debug and when I run the script again using node test.js, it takes another 2 minutes to load page and do the steps I needed. I just wanted to reopen the already opened tab and continue my script instead new window opens.
Edit day 2 : Still searching for solution. I tried below code to save object and reuse it.. Is this the correct approach ? I get a JSON parse error though.
var o = new chrome.Options();
o.addArguments("user-data-dir=/Users/vishnu/Library/Application Support/Google/Chrome/Profile 2");
o.addArguments("disable-infobars");
o.addArguments("--no-first-run");
var driver = new webdriver.Builder().withCapabilities(webdriver.Capabilities.chrome()).setChromeOptions(o).build();
var savefile = fs.writeFile('data.json', JSON.stringify(util.inspect(driver)) , 'utf-8');
var parsedJSON = require('./data.json');
console.log(parsedJSON);

It took me some time and a couple of different approaches, but I managed to work up something I think solves your problem and allows to develop tests in a rather nice way.
Because it does not directly answer the question of how to re-use a browser session in Selenium (using their JavaScript API), I will first present my proposed solution and then briefly discuss the other approaches I tried. It may give someone else an idea and help them to solve this problem in a nicer/better way. Who knows. At least my attempts will be documented.
Proposed solution (tested and works)
Because I did not manage to actually reuse a browser session (see below), I figured I could try something else. The approach will be the following.
Idea
Have a main loop in one file (say init.js) and tests in a separate file (test.js).
The main loop opens a browser instance and keeps it open. It also exposes some sort of CLI that allows one to run tests (from test.js), inspect errors as they occur and to close the browser instance and stop the main loop.
The test in test.js exports a test function that is being executed by the main loop. It is passed a driver instance to work with. Any errors that occur here are being caught by the main loop.
Because the browser instance is opened only once, we have to do the manual process of authenticating with WhatsApp (scanning a QR code) only once. After that, running a test will reload web.whatsapp.com, but it will have remembered that we authenticated and thus immediately be able to run whatever tests we define in test.js.
In order to keep the main loop alive, it is vital that we catch each and every error that might occur in our tests. I unfortunately had to resort to uncaughtException for that.
Implementation
This is the implementation of the above idea I came up with. It is possible to make this much fancier if you would want to do so. I went for simplicity here (hope I managed).
init.js
This is the main loop from the above idea.
var webdriver = require('selenium-webdriver'),
by = webdriver.By,
until = webdriver.until,
driver = null,
prompt = '> ',
testPath = 'test.js',
lastError = null;
function initDriver() {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// already opened a browser? done
if (driver !== null) {
resolve();
return;
}
// open a new browser, let user scan QR code
driver = new webdriver.Builder().forBrowser('chrome').build();
driver.get('https://web.whatsapp.com');
process.stdout.write("Please scan the QR code within 30 seconds...\n");
driver.wait(until.elementLocated(by.className('chat')), 30000)
.then(() => resolve())
.catch((timeout) => {
process.stdout.write("\b\bTimed out waiting for code to" +
" be scanned.\n");
driver.quit();
reject();
});
});
}
function recordError(err) {
process.stderr.write(err.name + ': ' + err.message + "\n");
lastError = err;
// let user know that test failed
process.stdout.write("Test failed!\n");
// indicate we are ready to read the next command
process.stdout.write(prompt);
}
process.stdout.write(prompt);
process.stdin.setEncoding('utf8');
process.stdin.on('readable', () => {
var chunk = process.stdin.read();
if (chunk === null) {
// happens on initialization, ignore
return;
}
// do various different things for different commands
var line = chunk.trim(),
cmds = line.split(/\s+/);
switch (cmds[0]) {
case 'error':
// print last error, when applicable
if (lastError !== null) {
console.log(lastError);
}
// indicate we are ready to read the next command
process.stdout.write(prompt);
break;
case 'run':
// open a browser if we didn't yet, execute tests
initDriver().then(() => {
// carefully load test code, report SyntaxError when applicable
var file = (cmds.length === 1 ? testPath : cmds[1] + '.js');
try {
var test = require('./' + file);
} catch (err) {
recordError(err);
return;
} finally {
// force node to read the test code again when we
// require it in the future
delete require.cache[__dirname + '/' + file];
}
// carefully execute tests, report errors when applicable
test.execute(driver, by, until)
.then(() => {
// indicate we are ready to read the next command
process.stdout.write(prompt);
})
.catch(recordError);
}).catch(() => process.stdin.destroy());
break;
case 'quit':
// close browser if it was opened and stop this process
if (driver !== null) {
driver.quit();
}
process.stdin.destroy();
return;
}
});
// some errors somehow still escape all catches we have...
process.on('uncaughtException', recordError);
test.js
This is the test from the above idea. I wrote some things just to test the main loop and some WebDriver functionality. Pretty much anything is possible here. I have used promises to make test execution work nicely with the main loop.
var driver, by, until,
timeout = 5000;
function waitAndClickElement(selector, index = 0) {
driver.wait(until.elementLocated(by.css(selector)), timeout)
.then(() => {
driver.findElements(by.css(selector)).then((els) => {
var element = els[index];
driver.wait(until.elementIsVisible(element), timeout);
element.click();
});
});
}
exports.execute = function(d, b, u) {
// make globally accessible for ease of use
driver = d;
by = b;
until = u;
// actual test as a promise
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// open site
driver.get('https://web.whatsapp.com');
// make sure it loads fine
driver.wait(until.elementLocated(by.className('chat')), timeout);
driver.wait(until.elementIsVisible(
driver.findElement(by.className('chat'))), timeout);
// open menu
waitAndClickElement('.icon.icon-menu');
// click profile link
waitAndClickElement('.menu-shortcut', 1);
// give profile time to animate
// this prevents an error from occurring when we try to click the close
// button while it is still being animated (workaround/hack!)
driver.sleep(500);
// close profile
waitAndClickElement('.btn-close-drawer');
driver.sleep(500); // same for hiding profile
// click some chat
waitAndClickElement('.chat', 3);
// let main script know we are done successfully
// we do so after all other webdriver promise have resolved by creating
// another webdriver promise and hooking into its resolve
driver.wait(until.elementLocated(by.className('chat')), timeout)
.then(() => resolve());
});
};
Example output
Here is some example output. The first invocation of run test will open up an instance of Chrome. Other invocations will use that same instance. When an error occurs, it can be inspected as shown. Executing quit will close the browser instance and quit the main loop.
$ node init.js
> run test
> run test
WebDriverError: unknown error: Element <div class="chat">...</div> is not clickable at point (163, 432). Other element would receive the click: <div dir="auto" contenteditable="false" class="input input-text">...</div>
(Session info: chrome=57.0.2987.133)
(Driver info: chromedriver=2.29.461571 (8a88bbe0775e2a23afda0ceaf2ef7ee74e822cc5),platform=Linux 4.9.0-2-amd64 x86_64)
Test failed!
> error
<prints complete stacktrace>
> run test
> quit
You can run tests in other files by simply calling them. Say you have a file test-foo.js, then execute run test-foo in the above prompt to run it. All tests will share the same Chrome instance.
Failed attempt #1: saving and restoring storage
When inspecting the page using my development tools, I noticed that it appears to use the localStorage. It is possible to export this as JSON and write it to a file. On a next invocation, this file can be read, parsed and written to the new browser instance storage before reloading the page.
Unfortunately, WhatsApp still required me to scan the QR code. I have tried to figure out what I missed (cookies, sessionStorage, ...), but did not manage. It is possible that WhatsApp registers the browser as being disconnected after some time has passed. Or that it uses other browser properties (session ID?) to recognize the browser. This is pure speculating from my side though.
Failed attempt #2: switching session/window
Every browser instance started via WebDriver has a session ID. This ID can be retrieved, so I figured it may be possible to start a session and then connect to it from the test cases, which would then be run from a separate file (you can see this is the predecessor of the final solution). Unfortunately, I have not been able to figure out a way to set the session ID. This may actually be a security concern, I am not sure. People more expert in the usage of WebDriver might be able to clarify here.
I did find out that it is possible to retrieve a list of window handles and switch between them. Unfortunately, windows are only shared within a single session and not across sessions.

HTML5 Webworker Startup Synchronization Guarantees

I have a bit of javascript I want to run in a webworker, and I am having a hard time understanding the correct approach to getting them to work in lock-step. I invoke the WebWorker from the main script as in the following simplified script:
// main.js
werker = new Worker("webWorkerScaffold.js");
// #1
werker.onmessage = function(msgObj){
console.log("Worker Reply")
console.log(msgObj);
doSomethingWithMsg(msgObj);
};
werker.onerror = function(err){
console.log("Worker Error:");
console.log(err);
};
werker.postMessage("begin");
Then the complimentary worker script looks like the following:
// webWorkerScaffold.js
var doWorkerStuffs = function(msg){}; // Omitted
// #2
onmessage = function (msgObj){
// Messages in will always be json
if (msgObj.data.msg === "begin")
doWorkerStuffs();
};
This code (the actual version) works as expected, but I am having a difficult time confirming it will always perform correctly. Consider the following:
The "new Worker()" call is made, spawning a new thread.
The spawned thread is slow to load (lets say hangs at "// #2")
The parent thread does "werker.postMessage..." with no recipient
... ?
The same applies in the reverse direction, where I might change the worker script to make noise outward once it is setup internally, under that scenario the main thread could hang at "// #1" and miss the incoming message as it dosen't have its comm's up.
Is there some way to guarantee that these scripts move forward in a lock-step way?
What I am really looking for is a zmq-like REP/REQ semantic, where one or the other blocks (or calls back) when 1:1 transactions can take place.

printing line numbers

For debugging, I want to be able to print messages, and have the line number prepended.
No, I don't want to get involved with a full-fledged debugger.
I have defined a global constant ln="thisline = new Error().lineNumber";
I have defined a
function println(msg) {
document.write("<br>at " + thisline + ":" + msg);
}
Then at the lines I want to debug I put a line saying:
eval(ln);
println("msg");
The problem is that thisline often doesn't get updated before the print, so I get long stretches with an unchanging line number. I never get more than 3 unique line numbers printed.
Is it just that the eval is too slow? Is there some way to wait till it finishes?
I tried a timeout:
const ln="setTimeout(function() {
thisline = new Error().lineNumber
}, 1000);"
but the global thisline never got set.
Or is it that there is some system limit on the number of errors I can raise?

If you are running the application in IE, then press F12 key(Developer tools) and another popup will open.
click on the Script Tab and click on Start Debugging button.
the page will refresh and you can start performing actions.
on any error, the debugger will automatically take you to the error line number. you can also place break points.
else you can look at the below following post:
How can I get a Javascript stack trace when I throw an exception?

Javascript: Suppress "Stop running this script?", or how to use setTimeout?

I'm building a js library that reads binary files, including zip files.
Because there's no direct native support for arrays of binary data, when the zip files get large, there's a lot of copying that has to go on (See my other question for details).
This results in a "Stop Running this script?" alert. Now, I know this can happen if there's an infinite loop, but in my case, it's not an infinite loop. It's not a bug in the program. It just takes a loooooong time.
How can I suppress this?

This message is for security reason enabled, because otherwise you could simply block the users browser with a simple never ending loop. I think there no way to deactivate it.
Think about splitting you processing into serval parts, and schedule them via setTimeout, this should surpress the message, because the script is now not running all the time.

You could divide the process into increments, then use setTimeout to add a small delay.

In IE (and maybe Firefox too), the message is based on the number of statements executed, not the running time. If you can split some of the processing into a separate function, and defer it with setTimeout, I believe that it won't count toward the limit.

...answering my own question, so I could post the code I used.
The main issue was, I was reading the entire contents of a file, with a readToEnd() method, which actually reads one byte at a time. When reading a large file, it took a looooong time. The solution was to read asynchronously, and in batches.
This is the code I used:
readToEndAsync : function(callback) {
_state = "";
var slarge = "";
var s = "";
var txtrdr = this;
var readBatchAsync = function() {
var c = 0;
var ch = txtrdr.readChar();
while(ch != null)
{
s += ch;c++;
if(c > 1024)
{
slarge += s;
s = "";
break;
}
ch = txtrdr.readChar();
}
if (ch!=null){
setTimeout(readBatchAsync, 2);
}
else {
callback(slarge+s);
}
};
// kickoff
readBatchAsync();
return null;
},
And to call it:
textReader.readToEndAsync(function(out){
say("The callback is complete");
// the content is in "out"
});

I believe this feature is specific to Firefox and/or other browsers, and it has nothing to do with the javascript language itself.
As far as I know you (the programmer) have no way of stopping it in your visitors' browser.