We can define a "class" In JavaScript by function, and get its "instance" by the "new" command. Just as follows:
function class_a() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is a_class");
}
}
function class_b() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is b_class");
}
}
var instance_a1 = new class_a();
var instance_b1 = new class_b();
instance_a1.tell();
instance_b1.tell();
My question is: Is there a way to generate these "classes" by the new command from another class? Just like this:
function typex(class_name)
{
...
}
var myclass_a = new typex("class_a");
var myclass_b = new typex("class_b");
var instance_a1 = new myclass_a();
var instance_b1 = new myclass_b();
instance_a1.tell();
instance_b1.tell();
Return the classes from typex but just as reference to the function itself (no invoking inside typex).
Option A: Private classes
function typex(class_name)
{
function class_a() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is a_class");
}
}
function class_b() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is b_class");
}
}
if (class_name === "class_a")
return class_a;
if (class_name === "class_b")
return class_b;
throw new Error("unrecognized classname");
}
Option B: Public classes
function class_a() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is a_class");
}
}
function class_b() {
this.tell = function () {
console.log("This is b_class");
}
}
function typex(class_name)
{
if (class_name === "class_a")
return class_a;
if (class_name === "class_b")
return class_b;
throw new Error("unrecognized classname");
}
Then running the code:
var myclass_a = new typex("class_a");
var myclass_b = new typex("class_b");
var instance_a1 = new myclass_a();
var instance_b1 = new myclass_b();
instance_a1.tell();
instance_b1.tell();
Creates for both the output
This is a_class
This is b_class
Firstly, I end up NOT using the keyword new when calling typex(...), bc I don't want whatever new typex(...) evalutes to to delegate its failed property lookups to typex.prototype.
Secondly, I capitalized MyClass_A and MyClass_B to indicate that they should be paired with the keyword new.
You could just have typex return a constructor function if that is the extent of your use case of these classes/instances.
function typex(class_name) {
var classes = {};
classes.class_a = function() {
this.tell = function() {
console.log('This is a_class');
};
};
classes.class_b = function() {
this.tell = function() {
console.log('This is b_class');
};
};
return classes[class_name];
}
var MyClass_A = typex("class_a");
var MyClass_B = typex("class_b");
var instance_a1 = new MyClass_A();
var instance_b1 = new MyClass_B();
instance_a1.tell(); // "This is class_a"
instance_b1.tell(); // "This is class_b"
instance_a1.constructor === instance_b1.constructor; // false (which is good)
Here's a heavily refactored version that reuses as much code and reduces memory usage as possible.
function typex(class_name) {
var ClassConstructor = function() {
this.class_name = class_name;
};
ClassConstructor.prototype.tell = function() {
console.log('This is ' + this.class_name);
};
return ClassConstructor;
}
var MyClass_A = typex("class_a");
var MyClass_B = typex("class_b");
var instance_a1 = new MyClass_A();
var instance_b1 = new MyClass_B();
instance_a1.tell(); // "This is class_a"
instance_b1.tell(); // "This is class_b"
instance_a1.constructor === instance_b1.constructor; // false (which is good)
Related
So i have this code:
function Class1() {
this.i = 1;
var that=this;
function nn() {
return 21;
}
this.aa = function() {
nn();
};
this.bb = function() {
this.aa();
};
this.cc = function() {
this.bb();
};
}
var o = new Class1();
var b=o.cc();
alert(b); //undefined
But when the alert is fired, I get an undefined error and not 21, Does the private method can not use a return? Thanks!
When using the function() {} syntax to define a function, you always explicitly need to return the value, i.e. not only from nn, but from all intermediate functions as well.
function Class1() {
this.i = 1;
var that = this;
function nn() {
return 21;
}
this.aa = function() {
return nn();
}
this.bb = function() {
return this.aa();
}
this.cc = function() {
return this.bb();
}
}
var o = new Class1();
var b = o.cc();
alert(b); // "21"
Apart from the answer above, the 'this' context seems weird in your functions. Maybe you are better of with arrow functions if you dont want to bind the this context to each function. I also think that it is better to actually separate private and public functions when using a 'class' like this.
function Class1() {
var _nn = function () {
return 21;
}
var _aa = function () {
return _nn();
}
var _bb = function () {
return _aa();
}
var cc = function () {
return _bb();
};
return {
cc
};
}
var o = new Class1();
var a = o.cc();
console.log(a);
Much easier to understand that it is only cc that is a public function.
So with arrow function it would instead look like this, and you can use the Class1 this context inside of your private functions without doing
var that = this; or using bind.
function Class1() {
this.privateThing = 'private';
var _nn = () => { return this.privateThing; };
var _aa = () => { return _nn(); };
var _bb = () => { return _aa(); };
var cc = () => { return _bb(); };
return {
cc
};
}
I'm studying Javascript and learning how to use call. I created this script and I don't know why I can't have access to this variable Time.
var MyObject;
(function(MyObject) {
var Runner = (function() {
function Runner(time) {
this.time = time;
}
var myFunctionArray = [];
Runner.prototype.execute = function() {
myFunctionArray[0]();
}
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
var test = function() {
return execute.call(this);
}
myFunctionArray.push(test);
}
return Runner;
})();
MyObject.Runner = Runner;
})(MyObject || (MyObject = {});
var myNewObj = new MyObject.Runner(1000); myNewObj.newTest('1', function() {
console.log(this.time) //output: undefined
});
So how can I get time value inside newTest function?
Issue is in newTest function
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
var test = function() {
return execute.call(this);
}
myFunctionArray.push(test);
}
Here this is pointing to test and not Runner. You will have to save context in a variable and then set it in call.
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
var self = this;
var test = function() {
return execute.call(self);
}
myFunctionArray.push(test);
}
.call + self
var MyObject;
(function(MyObject) {
var Runner = (function() {
function Runner(time) {
this.time = time;
}
var myFunctionArray = [];
Runner.prototype.execute = function() {
myFunctionArray[0]();
}
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
var self = this;
var test = function() {
return execute.call(self);
}
myFunctionArray.push(test);
}
return Runner;
})();
MyObject.Runner = Runner;
})(MyObject || (MyObject = {}));
var myNewObj = new MyObject.Runner(1000);
myNewObj.newTest('1', function() {
console.log(this, this.time) //output: undefined
});
myNewObj.execute()
.bind
As commented, you can even use .bind
var MyObject;
(function(MyObject) {
var Runner = (function() {
function Runner(time) {
this.time = time;
}
var myFunctionArray = [];
Runner.prototype.execute = function() {
myFunctionArray[0]();
}
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
myFunctionArray.push(execute.bind(this));
}
return Runner;
})();
MyObject.Runner = Runner;
})(MyObject || (MyObject = {}));
var myNewObj = new MyObject.Runner(1000);
myNewObj.newTest('1', function() {
console.log(this, this.time) //output: undefined
});
myNewObj.execute()
When you declare your Runner function, you've actually declared a function that takes no arguments that then itself declares a function called Runner that takes one argument.
Actually In this code snippet :
Runner.prototype.newTest = function(index, execute) {
var test = function() {
return execute.call(this);
}
myFunctionArray.push(test);
}
this will reference to test variable (as per constructor invocation pattern)
So, to pass right variable cache the value of this in another variable and then pass that to function.
I am learning javascript. When I call pictureArrayAdd method I receive error Picture.pictureArrayAdd is not a function. Why?
window.onload = init;
//window.picture = new Array();
function init() {
var button = document.getElementById("addButton");
button.onclick = addPicture;
}
function Picture() {};
Picture.prototype = {
pictureArray: [],
pictureArrayAdd: function(newImage) {
this.pictureArray.push(newImage);
return this
}
}
var addPicture = function() {
var textInput = document.getElementById ("pictureName");
var newPicture = textInput.value;
Picture.pictureArrayAdd(newPicture);
}
You have to initialize an instace of your object:
var addPicture = function() {
var textInput = document.getElementById ("pictureName");
var newPicture = textInput.value;
var pic = new Picture();
pic.pictureArrayAdd(newPicture);
}
Besides - just a tip -, you can use a optional parameter on your constructor, like this:
function Picture(newImage) {
if (newImage != undefined) {
this.pictureArrayAdd(newImage);
}
};
So you have a shortcut to your pictureArrayAdd function:
var pic = new Picture("picture1.png");
See it working here.
I am trying to simulate a namespace feature in Javascript.
var com = {};
com.domain = {};
com.domain.system = {};
com.domain.net = {};
com.domain.net.ip = {};
com.domain.net.ip.tcp = {};
com.domain.net.ip.udp = {};
com.domain.net.ip.ssl = {};
com.domain.util = {};
com.domain.util.timer = {};
com.domain.plugins = {};
com.domain.session = {};
com.domain.io = {};
com.domain.algorithm = {};
com.domain.debug = {};
This is the namespaces declaration. Later I will add functions to these namespaces.
This is my selector function:
For a convenient way to use namespaces, I add a function named $. This function will walk all namespaces in com. If the selected name exists, return the object.
function $ (selector) {
function digger (namespace, selector) {
for (var prop in namespace) {
if (typeof namespace[prop] == "array" || typeof namespace[prop] == "object") {
if (prop == selector) {
return namespace[prop];
}
var dig = digger(namespace[prop], selector);
if (dig != null) {
return dig;
}
} else {
if (prop == selector) {
return namespace[prop];
}
}
}
}
return digger (com, selector);
}
After that, I add a timer to namespace com.doamin.util.
com.domain.util.timer = function () {
this._handle = new InnerObj.SystemTimer(io);
return this;
};
com.domain.util.timer.prototype.expiresFromNow = function (seconds, cbHandler) {
this._handle.ExpiresFromNow (seconds, cbHandler);
};
com.domain.util.timer.prototype.wait = function (seconds, cbHandler) {
this._handle.Wait (seconds, cbHandler);
};
com.domain.util.timer.prototype.expiresAt = function (seconds, cbHandler) {
this._handle.Wait (seconds, cbHandler);
};
com.domain.util.timer.prototype.cancel = function () {
this._handle.Cancel ();
};
Usage:
1. var timer = new com.domain.util.timer (); OK
timer.expiresAt (1, {}); OK
2. var func = $("timer"); OK
var timer = new func (); OK
timer.expiresAt (1, {}); OK
But but but but but
var timer = new $("timer") (); NG
Can anyone tell me why the last new function is not working?
Try var timer = new ($("timer"))();.
Your question is not clear but I guess since $("timer") returns a function, you want a new instance of the result of $("timer") and not a new instance of $().
I have a name of a private function in JavaScript as a string, how do I call that function?
var test = function () {
this.callFunction = function(index) {
return this["func" + index]();
}
function func1() { }
function func2() { }
...
function funcN() { }
}
var obj = new test();
obj.callFunction(1);
func1 and friends are local variables, not members of the object. You can't call them like that (at least not in any sane way).
Define them with function expressions (instead of function declarations) and store them in an array.
var test = function () {
this.callFunction = function(index) {
return funcs[index]();
}
var funcs = [
function () {},
function () {},
function () {}
];
}
var obj = new test();
obj.callFunction(0);
As your code stands, the functions are not present as properties of the instance. What you need to do is create them as properties of the context.
var test = function () {
this.callFunction = function(index) {
return this["func" + index];
}
this.func1 = function() { }
this.func2 = function() { }
...
}
var obj = new test();
obj.callFunction(1)();
you can use eval
var test = function () {
this.callFunction = function(index) {
return eval("func" + index + '()');
}
function func1() {
return 1;
}
function func2() {
return 2;
}
function funcN() { }
};
var obj = new test();
obj.callFunction(2);
eval is evil
You can use a private array of functions:
var test = function() {
var func = [
function() { return "one" },
function() { return "two"; }
]
this.callFunction = function(index) {
return func[index]();
}
}
var obj = new test();
var ret = obj.callFunction(1);
console.log(ret);
http://jsfiddle.net/V8FaJ/