Related
This question already has answers here:
Cartesian product of multiple arrays in JavaScript
(35 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I'm having trouble coming up with code to generate combinations from n number of arrays with m number of elements in them, in JavaScript. I've seen similar questions about this for other languages, but the answers incorporate syntactic or library magic that I'm unsure how to translate.
Consider this data:
[[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]
3 arrays, with a different number of elements in them. What I want to do is get all combinations by combining an item from each array.
For example:
0,0,0 // item 0 from array 0, item 0 from array 1, item 0 from array 2
0,0,1
0,0,2
0,1,0
0,1,1
0,1,2
0,2,0
0,2,1
0,2,2
And so on.
If the number of arrays were fixed, it would be easy to make a hard coded implementation. But the number of arrays may vary:
[[0,1], [0,1]]
[[0,1,3,4], [0,1], [0], [0,1]]
Any help would be much appreciated.
Here is a quite simple and short one using a recursive helper function:
function cartesian(...args) {
var r = [], max = args.length-1;
function helper(arr, i) {
for (var j=0, l=args[i].length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(0); // clone arr
a.push(args[i][j]);
if (i==max)
r.push(a);
else
helper(a, i+1);
}
}
helper([], 0);
return r;
}
Usage:
cartesian([0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]);
To make the function take an array of arrays, just change the signature to function cartesian(args) instead of using rest parameter syntax.
I suggest a simple recursive generator function:
// JS
function* cartesianIterator(head, ...tail) {
const remainder = tail.length ? cartesianIterator(...tail) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of head) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = items => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));
// TS
function* cartesianIterator<T>(items: T[][]): Generator<T[]> {
const remainder = items.length > 1 ? cartesianIterator(items.slice(1)) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of items.at(0)!) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = <T>(items: T[][]) => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));
You could take an iterative approach by building sub arrays.
var parts = [[0, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2]],
result = parts.reduce((a, b) => a.reduce((r, v) => r.concat(b.map(w => [].concat(v, w))), []));
console.log(result.map(a => a.join(', ')));
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
After doing a little research I discovered a previous related question:
Finding All Combinations of JavaScript array values
I've adapted some of the code from there so that it returns an array of arrays containing all of the permutations:
function(arraysToCombine) {
var divisors = [];
for (var i = arraysToCombine.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
divisors[i] = divisors[i + 1] ? divisors[i + 1] * arraysToCombine[i + 1].length : 1;
}
function getPermutation(n, arraysToCombine) {
var result = [],
curArray;
for (var i = 0; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
curArray = arraysToCombine[i];
result.push(curArray[Math.floor(n / divisors[i]) % curArray.length]);
}
return result;
}
var numPerms = arraysToCombine[0].length;
for(var i = 1; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
numPerms *= arraysToCombine[i].length;
}
var combinations = [];
for(var i = 0; i < numPerms; i++) {
combinations.push(getPermutation(i, arraysToCombine));
}
return combinations;
}
I've put a working copy at http://jsfiddle.net/7EakX/ that takes the array you gave earlier ([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]) and outputs the result to the browser console.
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
console.log(charSet.reduce((a,b)=>a.flatMap(x=>b.map(y=>x+y)),['']))
Just for fun, here's a more functional variant of the solution in my first answer:
function cartesian() {
var r = [], args = Array.from(arguments);
args.reduceRight(function(cont, factor, i) {
return function(arr) {
for (var j=0, l=factor.length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(); // clone arr
a[i] = factor[j];
cont(a);
}
};
}, Array.prototype.push.bind(r))(new Array(args.length));
return r;
}
Alternative, for full speed we can dynamically compile our own loops:
function cartesian() {
return (cartesian.cache[arguments.length] || cartesian.compile(arguments.length)).apply(null, arguments);
}
cartesian.cache = [];
cartesian.compile = function compile(n) {
var args = [],
indent = "",
up = "",
down = "";
for (var i=0; i<n; i++) {
var arr = "$"+String.fromCharCode(97+i),
ind = String.fromCharCode(105+i);
args.push(arr);
up += indent+"for (var "+ind+"=0, l"+arr+"="+arr+".length; "+ind+"<l"+arr+"; "+ind+"++) {\n";
down = indent+"}\n"+down;
indent += " ";
up += indent+"arr["+i+"] = "+arr+"["+ind+"];\n";
}
var body = "var res=[],\n arr=[];\n"+up+indent+"res.push(arr.slice());\n"+down+"return res;";
return cartesian.cache[n] = new Function(args, body);
}
var f = function(arr){
if(typeof arr !== 'object'){
return false;
}
arr = arr.filter(function(elem){ return (elem !== null); }); // remove empty elements - make sure length is correct
var len = arr.length;
var nextPerm = function(){ // increase the counter(s)
var i = 0;
while(i < len)
{
arr[i].counter++;
if(arr[i].counter >= arr[i].length){
arr[i].counter = 0;
i++;
}else{
return false;
}
}
return true;
};
var getPerm = function(){ // get the current permutation
var perm_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
perm_arr.push(arr[i][arr[i].counter]);
}
return perm_arr;
};
var new_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++) // set up a counter property inside the arrays
{
arr[i].counter = 0;
}
while(true)
{
new_arr.push(getPerm()); // add current permutation to the new array
if(nextPerm() === true){ // get next permutation, if returns true, we got them all
break;
}
}
return new_arr;
};
Here's another way of doing it. I treat the indices of all of the arrays like a number whose digits are all different bases (like time and dates), using the length of the array as the radix.
So, using your first set of data, the first digit is base 2, the second is base 4, and the third is base 3. The counter starts 000, then goes 001, 002, then 010. The digits correspond to indices in the arrays, and since order is preserved, this is no problem.
I have a fiddle with it working here: http://jsfiddle.net/Rykus0/DS9Ea/1/
and here is the code:
// Arbitrary base x number class
var BaseX = function(initRadix){
this.radix = initRadix ? initRadix : 1;
this.value = 0;
this.increment = function(){
return( (this.value = (this.value + 1) % this.radix) === 0);
}
}
function combinations(input){
var output = [], // Array containing the resulting combinations
counters = [], // Array of counters corresponding to our input arrays
remainder = false, // Did adding one cause the previous digit to rollover?
temp; // Holds one combination to be pushed into the output array
// Initialize the counters
for( var i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
counters.unshift(new BaseX(input[i].length));
}
// Get all possible combinations
// Loop through until the first counter rolls over
while( !remainder ){
temp = []; // Reset the temporary value collection array
remainder = true; // Always increment the last array counter
// Process each of the arrays
for( i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
temp.unshift(input[i][counters[i].value]); // Add this array's value to the result
// If the counter to the right rolled over, increment this one.
if( remainder ){
remainder = counters[i].increment();
}
}
output.push(temp); // Collect the results.
}
return output;
}
// Input is an array of arrays
console.log(combinations([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]));
You can use a recursive function to get all combinations
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '', final = []) => {
if (arr.length > 1) {
arr[0].forEach(v => loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v, final))
} else {
arr[0].forEach(v => final.push(str + v))
}
return final
}
console.log(loopOver(charSet))
This code can still be shorten using ternary but i prefer the first version for readability 😊
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '') => arr[0].map(v => arr.length > 1 ? loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v) : str + v).flat()
console.log(loopOver(charSet))
Another implementation with ES6 recursive style
Array.prototype.cartesian = function(a,...as){
return a ? this.reduce((p,c) => (p.push(...a.cartesian(...as).map(e => as.length ? [c,...e] : [c,e])),p),[])
: this;
};
console.log(JSON.stringify([0,1].cartesian([0,1,2,3], [[0],[1],[2]])));
This question already has answers here:
Cartesian product of multiple arrays in JavaScript
(35 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
I'm having trouble coming up with code to generate combinations from n number of arrays with m number of elements in them, in JavaScript. I've seen similar questions about this for other languages, but the answers incorporate syntactic or library magic that I'm unsure how to translate.
Consider this data:
[[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]
3 arrays, with a different number of elements in them. What I want to do is get all combinations by combining an item from each array.
For example:
0,0,0 // item 0 from array 0, item 0 from array 1, item 0 from array 2
0,0,1
0,0,2
0,1,0
0,1,1
0,1,2
0,2,0
0,2,1
0,2,2
And so on.
If the number of arrays were fixed, it would be easy to make a hard coded implementation. But the number of arrays may vary:
[[0,1], [0,1]]
[[0,1,3,4], [0,1], [0], [0,1]]
Any help would be much appreciated.
Here is a quite simple and short one using a recursive helper function:
function cartesian(...args) {
var r = [], max = args.length-1;
function helper(arr, i) {
for (var j=0, l=args[i].length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(0); // clone arr
a.push(args[i][j]);
if (i==max)
r.push(a);
else
helper(a, i+1);
}
}
helper([], 0);
return r;
}
Usage:
cartesian([0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]);
To make the function take an array of arrays, just change the signature to function cartesian(args) instead of using rest parameter syntax.
I suggest a simple recursive generator function:
// JS
function* cartesianIterator(head, ...tail) {
const remainder = tail.length ? cartesianIterator(...tail) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of head) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = items => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));
// TS
function* cartesianIterator<T>(items: T[][]): Generator<T[]> {
const remainder = items.length > 1 ? cartesianIterator(items.slice(1)) : [[]];
for (let r of remainder) for (let h of items.at(0)!) yield [h, ...r];
}
// get values:
const cartesian = <T>(items: T[][]) => [...cartesianIterator(items)];
console.log(cartesian(input));
You could take an iterative approach by building sub arrays.
var parts = [[0, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 1, 2]],
result = parts.reduce((a, b) => a.reduce((r, v) => r.concat(b.map(w => [].concat(v, w))), []));
console.log(result.map(a => a.join(', ')));
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
After doing a little research I discovered a previous related question:
Finding All Combinations of JavaScript array values
I've adapted some of the code from there so that it returns an array of arrays containing all of the permutations:
function(arraysToCombine) {
var divisors = [];
for (var i = arraysToCombine.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
divisors[i] = divisors[i + 1] ? divisors[i + 1] * arraysToCombine[i + 1].length : 1;
}
function getPermutation(n, arraysToCombine) {
var result = [],
curArray;
for (var i = 0; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
curArray = arraysToCombine[i];
result.push(curArray[Math.floor(n / divisors[i]) % curArray.length]);
}
return result;
}
var numPerms = arraysToCombine[0].length;
for(var i = 1; i < arraysToCombine.length; i++) {
numPerms *= arraysToCombine[i].length;
}
var combinations = [];
for(var i = 0; i < numPerms; i++) {
combinations.push(getPermutation(i, arraysToCombine));
}
return combinations;
}
I've put a working copy at http://jsfiddle.net/7EakX/ that takes the array you gave earlier ([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]) and outputs the result to the browser console.
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
console.log(charSet.reduce((a,b)=>a.flatMap(x=>b.map(y=>x+y)),['']))
Just for fun, here's a more functional variant of the solution in my first answer:
function cartesian() {
var r = [], args = Array.from(arguments);
args.reduceRight(function(cont, factor, i) {
return function(arr) {
for (var j=0, l=factor.length; j<l; j++) {
var a = arr.slice(); // clone arr
a[i] = factor[j];
cont(a);
}
};
}, Array.prototype.push.bind(r))(new Array(args.length));
return r;
}
Alternative, for full speed we can dynamically compile our own loops:
function cartesian() {
return (cartesian.cache[arguments.length] || cartesian.compile(arguments.length)).apply(null, arguments);
}
cartesian.cache = [];
cartesian.compile = function compile(n) {
var args = [],
indent = "",
up = "",
down = "";
for (var i=0; i<n; i++) {
var arr = "$"+String.fromCharCode(97+i),
ind = String.fromCharCode(105+i);
args.push(arr);
up += indent+"for (var "+ind+"=0, l"+arr+"="+arr+".length; "+ind+"<l"+arr+"; "+ind+"++) {\n";
down = indent+"}\n"+down;
indent += " ";
up += indent+"arr["+i+"] = "+arr+"["+ind+"];\n";
}
var body = "var res=[],\n arr=[];\n"+up+indent+"res.push(arr.slice());\n"+down+"return res;";
return cartesian.cache[n] = new Function(args, body);
}
var f = function(arr){
if(typeof arr !== 'object'){
return false;
}
arr = arr.filter(function(elem){ return (elem !== null); }); // remove empty elements - make sure length is correct
var len = arr.length;
var nextPerm = function(){ // increase the counter(s)
var i = 0;
while(i < len)
{
arr[i].counter++;
if(arr[i].counter >= arr[i].length){
arr[i].counter = 0;
i++;
}else{
return false;
}
}
return true;
};
var getPerm = function(){ // get the current permutation
var perm_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++)
{
perm_arr.push(arr[i][arr[i].counter]);
}
return perm_arr;
};
var new_arr = [];
for(var i = 0; i < len; i++) // set up a counter property inside the arrays
{
arr[i].counter = 0;
}
while(true)
{
new_arr.push(getPerm()); // add current permutation to the new array
if(nextPerm() === true){ // get next permutation, if returns true, we got them all
break;
}
}
return new_arr;
};
Here's another way of doing it. I treat the indices of all of the arrays like a number whose digits are all different bases (like time and dates), using the length of the array as the radix.
So, using your first set of data, the first digit is base 2, the second is base 4, and the third is base 3. The counter starts 000, then goes 001, 002, then 010. The digits correspond to indices in the arrays, and since order is preserved, this is no problem.
I have a fiddle with it working here: http://jsfiddle.net/Rykus0/DS9Ea/1/
and here is the code:
// Arbitrary base x number class
var BaseX = function(initRadix){
this.radix = initRadix ? initRadix : 1;
this.value = 0;
this.increment = function(){
return( (this.value = (this.value + 1) % this.radix) === 0);
}
}
function combinations(input){
var output = [], // Array containing the resulting combinations
counters = [], // Array of counters corresponding to our input arrays
remainder = false, // Did adding one cause the previous digit to rollover?
temp; // Holds one combination to be pushed into the output array
// Initialize the counters
for( var i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
counters.unshift(new BaseX(input[i].length));
}
// Get all possible combinations
// Loop through until the first counter rolls over
while( !remainder ){
temp = []; // Reset the temporary value collection array
remainder = true; // Always increment the last array counter
// Process each of the arrays
for( i = input.length-1; i >= 0; i-- ){
temp.unshift(input[i][counters[i].value]); // Add this array's value to the result
// If the counter to the right rolled over, increment this one.
if( remainder ){
remainder = counters[i].increment();
}
}
output.push(temp); // Collect the results.
}
return output;
}
// Input is an array of arrays
console.log(combinations([[0,1], [0,1,2,3], [0,1,2]]));
You can use a recursive function to get all combinations
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '', final = []) => {
if (arr.length > 1) {
arr[0].forEach(v => loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v, final))
} else {
arr[0].forEach(v => final.push(str + v))
}
return final
}
console.log(loopOver(charSet))
This code can still be shorten using ternary but i prefer the first version for readability 😊
const charSet = [["A", "B"],["C", "D", "E"],["F", "G", "H", "I"]];
let loopOver = (arr, str = '') => arr[0].map(v => arr.length > 1 ? loopOver(arr.slice(1), str + v) : str + v).flat()
console.log(loopOver(charSet))
Another implementation with ES6 recursive style
Array.prototype.cartesian = function(a,...as){
return a ? this.reduce((p,c) => (p.push(...a.cartesian(...as).map(e => as.length ? [c,...e] : [c,e])),p),[])
: this;
};
console.log(JSON.stringify([0,1].cartesian([0,1,2,3], [[0],[1],[2]])));
I have run into an issue where I am trying to join two arrays similar to the ones below:
var participants = [
{id: 1, name: "abe"},
{id:2, name:"joe"}
];
var results = [
[
{question: 6, participantId: 1, answer:"test1"},
{question: 6, participantId: 2, answer:"test2"}
],
[
{question: 7, participantId: 1, answer:"test1"},
{question: 7, participantId: 2, answer:"test2"}
]
];
Using nested loops:
_.each(participants, function(participant) {
var row, rowIndex;
row = [];
var rowIndex = 2
return _.each(results, function(result) {
return _.each(result, function(subResult) {
var data;
data = _.find(subResult, function(part) {
return part.participantId === participant.id;
});
row[rowIndex] = data.answer;
return rowIndex++;
});
});
});
This works ok as long as the arrays are small, but once they get larger I am getting huge performance problems. Is there a faster way to combine two arrays in this way?
This is a slimmed down version of my real dataset/code. Please let me know if anything doesn't make sense.
FYI
My end goal is to create a collection of rows for each participant containing their answers. Something like:
[
["abe","test1","test1"],
["joe","test2","test2"]
]
The perf* is not from the for loops so you can change them to _ iteration if they gross you out
var o = Object.create(null);
for( var i = 0, len = participants.length; i < len; ++i ) {
o[participants[i].id] = [participants[i].name];
}
for( var i = 0, len = results.length; i < len; ++i ) {
var innerResult = results[i];
for( var j = 0, len2 = innerResult.length; j < len2; ++j) {
o[innerResult[j].participantId].push(innerResult[j].answer);
}
}
//The rows are in o but you can get an array of course if you want:
var result = [];
for( var key in o ) {
result.push(o[key]);
}
*Well if _ uses native .forEach then that's easily order of magnitude slower than for loop but still your problem is 4 nested loops right now so you might not even need the additional 10x after fixing that.
Here is a solution using ECMA5 methods
Javascript
var makeRows1 = (function () {
"use strict";
function reduceParticipants(previous, participant) {
previous[participant.id] = [participant.name];
return previous;
}
function reduceResult(previous, subResult) {
previous[subResult.participantId].push(subResult.answer);
return previous;
}
function filterParticipants(participant) {
return participant;
}
return function (participants, results) {
var row = participants.reduce(reduceParticipants, []);
results.forEach(function (result) {
result.reduce(reduceResult, row);
});
return row.filter(filterParticipants);
};
}());
This will not be as fast as using raw for loops, like #Esailija answer, but it's not as slow as you may think. It's certainly faster than using Underscore, like your example or the answer given by #Maroshii
Anyway, here is a jsFiddle of all three answers that demonstrates that they all give the same result. It uses quite a large data set, I don't know it compares to the size you are using. The data is generated with the following:
Javascript
function makeName() {
var text = "",
possible = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy",
i;
for (i = 0; i < 5; i += 1) {
text += possible.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * possible.length));
}
return text;
}
var count,
count2,
index,
index2,
participants = [],
results = [];
for (index = 0, count = 1000; index < count; index += 4) {
participants.push({
id: index,
name: makeName()
});
}
for (index = 0, count = 1000; index < count; index += 1) {
results[index] = [];
for (index2 = 0, count2 = participants.length; index2 < count2; index2 += 1) {
results[index].push({
question: index,
participantId: participants[index2].id,
answer: "test" + index
});
}
}
Finally, we have a jsperf that compares these three methods, run on the generated data set.
Haven't tested it with large amounts of data but here's an approach:
var groups = _.groupBy(_.flatten(results),'participantId');
var result =_.reduce(groups,function(memo,group) {
var user = _.find(participants,function(p) { return p.id === group[0].participantId; });
var arr = _.pluck(group,'answer');
arr.unshift(user.name);
memo.push(arr);
return memo ;
},[]);
The amounts of groups would be the amount of arrays that you'll have so then iterating over that with not grow exponentially as if you call _.each(_.each(_.each which can be quite expensive.
Again, should be tested.
This question already has answers here:
Get all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)
(91 answers)
Closed 1 year ago.
How can I get a list of unique values in an array? Do I always have to use a second array or is there something similar to java's hashmap in JavaScript?
I am going to be using JavaScript and jQuery only. No additional libraries can be used.
Here's a much cleaner solution for ES6 that I see isn't included here. It uses the Set and the spread operator: ...
var a = [1, 1, 2];
[... new Set(a)]
Which returns [1, 2]
Or for those looking for a one-liner (simple and functional) compatible with current browsers:
let a = ["1", "1", "2", "3", "3", "1"];
let unique = a.filter((item, i, ar) => ar.indexOf(item) === i);
console.log(unique);
Update 2021
I would recommend checking out Charles Clayton's answer, as of recent changes to JS there are even more concise ways to do this.
Update 18-04-2017
It appears as though 'Array.prototype.includes' now has widespread support in the latest versions of the mainline browsers (compatibility)
Update 29-07-2015:
There are plans in the works for browsers to support a standardized 'Array.prototype.includes' method, which although does not directly answer this question; is often related.
Usage:
["1", "1", "2", "3", "3", "1"].includes("2"); // true
Pollyfill (browser support, source from mozilla):
// https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-array.prototype.includes
if (!Array.prototype.includes) {
Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, 'includes', {
value: function(searchElement, fromIndex) {
// 1. Let O be ? ToObject(this value).
if (this == null) {
throw new TypeError('"this" is null or not defined');
}
var o = Object(this);
// 2. Let len be ? ToLength(? Get(O, "length")).
var len = o.length >>> 0;
// 3. If len is 0, return false.
if (len === 0) {
return false;
}
// 4. Let n be ? ToInteger(fromIndex).
// (If fromIndex is undefined, this step produces the value 0.)
var n = fromIndex | 0;
// 5. If n ≥ 0, then
// a. Let k be n.
// 6. Else n < 0,
// a. Let k be len + n.
// b. If k < 0, let k be 0.
var k = Math.max(n >= 0 ? n : len - Math.abs(n), 0);
// 7. Repeat, while k < len
while (k < len) {
// a. Let elementK be the result of ? Get(O, ! ToString(k)).
// b. If SameValueZero(searchElement, elementK) is true, return true.
// c. Increase k by 1.
// NOTE: === provides the correct "SameValueZero" comparison needed here.
if (o[k] === searchElement) {
return true;
}
k++;
}
// 8. Return false
return false;
}
});
}
Since I went on about it in the comments for #Rocket's answer, I may as well provide an example that uses no libraries. This requires two new prototype functions, contains and unique
Array.prototype.contains = function(v) {
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (this[i] === v) return true;
}
return false;
};
Array.prototype.unique = function() {
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (!arr.contains(this[i])) {
arr.push(this[i]);
}
}
return arr;
}
var duplicates = [1, 3, 4, 2, 1, 2, 3, 8];
var uniques = duplicates.unique(); // result = [1,3,4,2,8]
console.log(uniques);
For more reliability, you can replace contains with MDN's indexOf shim and check if each element's indexOf is equal to -1: documentation
One Liner, Pure JavaScript
With ES6 syntax
list = list.filter((x, i, a) => a.indexOf(x) === i)
x --> item in array
i --> index of item
a --> array reference, (in this case "list")
With ES5 syntax
list = list.filter(function (x, i, a) {
return a.indexOf(x) === i;
});
Browser Compatibility: IE9+
Using EcmaScript 2016 you can simply do it like this.
var arr = ["a", "a", "b"];
var uniqueArray = Array.from(new Set(arr)); // Unique Array ['a', 'b'];
Sets are always unique, and using Array.from() you can convert a Set to an array. For reference have a look at the documentations.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/from
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Set
These days, you can use ES6's Set data type to convert your array to a unique Set. Then, if you need to use array methods, you can turn it back into an Array:
var arr = ["a", "a", "b"];
var uniqueSet = new Set(arr); // {"a", "b"}
var uniqueArr = Array.from(uniqueSet); // ["a", "b"]
//Then continue to use array methods:
uniqueArr.join(", "); // "a, b"
If you want to leave the original array intact,
you need a second array to contain the uniqe elements of the first-
Most browsers have Array.prototype.filter:
const unique = array1.filter((item, index, array) => array.indexOf(item) === index);
//if you need a 'shim':
Array.prototype.filter= Array.prototype.filter || function(fun, scope){
var T= this, A= [], i= 0, itm, L= T.length;
if(typeof fun== 'function'){
while(i<L){
if(i in T){
itm= T[i];
if(fun.call(scope, itm, i, T)) A[A.length]= itm;
}
++i;
}
}
return A;
}
Array.prototype.indexOf= Array.prototype.indexOf || function(what, i){
if(!i || typeof i!= 'number') i= 0;
var L= this.length;
while(i<L){
if(this[i]=== what) return i;
++i;
}
return -1;
}
Fast, compact, no nested loops, works with any object not just strings and numbers, takes a predicate, and only 5 lines of code!!
function findUnique(arr, predicate) {
var found = {};
arr.forEach(d => {
found[predicate(d)] = d;
});
return Object.keys(found).map(key => found[key]);
}
Example: To find unique items by type:
var things = [
{ name: 'charm', type: 'quark'},
{ name: 'strange', type: 'quark'},
{ name: 'proton', type: 'boson'},
];
var result = findUnique(things, d => d.type);
// [
// { name: 'charm', type: 'quark'},
// { name: 'proton', type: 'boson'}
// ]
If you want it to find the first unique item instead of the last add a found.hasOwnPropery() check in there.
Not native in Javascript, but plenty of libraries have this method.
Underscore.js's _.uniq(array) (link) works quite well (source).
If you don't need to worry so much about older browsers, this is exactly what Sets are designed for.
The Set object lets you store unique values of any type, whether
primitive values or object references.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Set
const set1 = new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1]);
// returns Set(5)Â {1, 2, 3, 4, 5}
Using jQuery, here's an Array unique function I made:
Array.prototype.unique = function () {
var arr = this;
return $.grep(arr, function (v, i) {
return $.inArray(v, arr) === i;
});
}
console.log([1,2,3,1,2,3].unique()); // [1,2,3]
Short and sweet solution using second array;
var axes2=[1,4,5,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,1,3,4];
var distinct_axes2=[];
for(var i=0;i<axes2.length;i++)
{
var str=axes2[i];
if(distinct_axes2.indexOf(str)==-1)
{
distinct_axes2.push(str);
}
}
console.log("distinct_axes2 : "+distinct_axes2); // distinct_axes2 : 1,4,5,2,3
Majority of the solutions above have a high run time complexity.
Here is the solution that uses reduce and can do the job in O(n) time.
Array.prototype.unique = Array.prototype.unique || function() {
var arr = [];
this.reduce(function (hash, num) {
if(typeof hash[num] === 'undefined') {
hash[num] = 1;
arr.push(num);
}
return hash;
}, {});
return arr;
}
var myArr = [3,1,2,3,3,3];
console.log(myArr.unique()); //[3,1,2];
Note:
This solution is not dependent on reduce. The idea is to create an object map and push unique ones into the array.
You only need vanilla JS to find uniques with Array.some and Array.reduce. With ES2015 syntax it's only 62 characters.
a.reduce((c, v) => b.some(w => w === v) ? c : c.concat(v)), b)
Array.some and Array.reduce are supported in IE9+ and other browsers. Just change the fat arrow functions for regular functions to support in browsers that don't support ES2015 syntax.
var a = [1,2,3];
var b = [4,5,6];
// .reduce can return a subset or superset
var uniques = a.reduce(function(c, v){
// .some stops on the first time the function returns true
return (b.some(function(w){ return w === v; }) ?
// if there's a match, return the array "c"
c :
// if there's no match, then add to the end and return the entire array
c.concat(v)}),
// the second param in .reduce is the starting variable. This is will be "c" the first time it runs.
b);
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/some
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/Reduce
Another thought of this question. Here is what I did to achieve this with fewer code.
var distinctMap = {};
var testArray = ['John', 'John', 'Jason', 'Jason'];
for (var i = 0; i < testArray.length; i++) {
var value = testArray[i];
distinctMap[value] = '';
};
var unique_values = Object.keys(distinctMap);
console.log(unique_values);
Array.prototype.unique = function () {
var dictionary = {};
var uniqueValues = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
if (dictionary[this[i]] == undefined){
dictionary[this[i]] = i;
uniqueValues.push(this[i]);
}
}
return uniqueValues;
}
I have tried this problem in pure JS.
I have followed following steps 1. Sort the given array, 2. loop through the sorted array, 3. Verify previous value and next value with current value
// JS
var inpArr = [1, 5, 5, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2,2, 100, 100, -1];
//sort the given array
inpArr.sort(function(a, b){
return a-b;
});
var finalArr = [];
//loop through the inpArr
for(var i=0; i<inpArr.length; i++){
//check previous and next value
if(inpArr[i-1]!=inpArr[i] && inpArr[i] != inpArr[i+1]){
finalArr.push(inpArr[i]);
}
}
console.log(finalArr);
Demo
You can enter array with duplicates and below method will return array with unique elements.
function getUniqueArray(array){
var uniqueArray = [];
if (array.length > 0) {
uniqueArray[0] = array[0];
}
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
var isExist = false;
for(var j = 0; j < uniqueArray.length; j++){
if(array[i] == uniqueArray[j]){
isExist = true;
break;
}
else{
isExist = false;
}
}
if(isExist == false){
uniqueArray[uniqueArray.length] = array[i];
}
}
return uniqueArray;
}
Here is an approach with customizable equals function which can be used for primitives as well as for custom objects:
Array.prototype.pushUnique = function(element, equalsPredicate = (l, r) => l == r) {
let res = !this.find(item => equalsPredicate(item, element))
if(res){
this.push(element)
}
return res
}
usage:
//with custom equals for objects
myArrayWithObjects.pushUnique(myObject, (left, right) => left.id == right.id)
//with default equals for primitives
myArrayWithPrimitives.pushUnique(somePrimitive)
I was just thinking if we can use linear search to eliminate the duplicates:
JavaScript:
function getUniqueRadios() {
var x=document.getElementById("QnA");
var ansArray = new Array();
var prev;
for (var i=0;i<x.length;i++)
{
// Check for unique radio button group
if (x.elements[i].type == "radio")
{
// For the first element prev will be null, hence push it into array and set the prev var.
if (prev == null)
{
prev = x.elements[i].name;
ansArray.push(x.elements[i].name);
} else {
// We will only push the next radio element if its not identical to previous.
if (prev != x.elements[i].name)
{
prev = x.elements[i].name;
ansArray.push(x.elements[i].name);
}
}
}
}
alert(ansArray);
}
HTML:
<body>
<form name="QnA" action="" method='post' ">
<input type="radio" name="g1" value="ANSTYPE1"> good </input>
<input type="radio" name="g1" value="ANSTYPE2"> avg </input>
<input type="radio" name="g2" value="ANSTYPE3"> Type1 </input>
<input type="radio" name="g2" value="ANSTYPE2"> Type2 </input>
<input type="submit" value='SUBMIT' onClick="javascript:getUniqueRadios()"></input>
</form>
</body>
I have a json array of objects that look like this: {id:'the id', name:'the name'}; and I need to loop over the array and group each object alphabetically by it's name attribute. Is there a way to do this without using a switch / if statement with every letter in it?
What I don't want to do is something like this:
if(data[i].name..slice(0, 1) == 'a') {
...
}
It's a large array, with almost a 1,000 objects in it. My goal is eventually append them to a dive so it looks something like this:
4
4 pints
4 biscuits
A
Apple
Alex
Adam
B
Bob
Billy
you can loop throught your collections like this:
var groupedCollection = {};
for(...){//loop throug collection
var firstLetter = data[i].charAt(0);
if(groupedCollection[firstLetter] == undefined){
groupedCollection[firstLetter] = [];
}
groupedCollection[firstLetter].push(data[i]);
}
//groupedCollection now contait data in the form of {a: [], b:[], etc...}
Bubble sort will do this job for you. Example:
// sample array
var myArr = [
{id:"00", name:"Billy"},
{id:"00", name:"Apple"},
{id:"00", name:"4 biscuits"},
{id:"00", name:"Adam"},
{id:"00", name:"Alex"},
{id:"00", name:"4 pints"},
{id:"00", name:"Bob"}
];
// standard bubble sort algorithm
function bubbleSortByName(arr) {
for (var x = 0; x < arr.length; x++) {
for(var y = 0; y < arr.length-1; y++) {
// compare arr[].name.toLowerCase() i.e. b > a
if(arr[y].name.toLowerCase() > arr[y+1].name.toLowerCase()) {
var tmp = arr[y+1];
arr[y+1] = arr[y];
arr[y] = tmp;
}
}
}
return arr;
}
// sort the array
var sortedArr = bubbleSortByName(myArr);
// print the results
for (var i=0; i<sortedArr.length; i++)
document.write(sortedArr[i].name+"<br/>");
Or the same idea with an insertion sort algorithm:
// standard insertion sort algorithm
function insertionSortByName(arr) {
for(var j = 1; j < arr.length; j++) {
var key = arr[j];
var i = j - 1;
while(i >= 0 && arr[i].name.toLowerCase() > key.name.toLowerCase()) {
arr[i+1] = arr[i];
i = i - 1;
}
arr[i+1] = key;
}
return arr;
}
ES7 syntax
const sortAndGroup = async () => {
const sortedData = data.sort();
const reducedData = sortedData.reduce((items, dataElement) => {
if (!items.find(item => item.header === dataElement.charAt(0))) {
items.push({ header: dataElement.charAt(0) });
}
items.push({ name: dataElement });
return items;
}, []);
return reducedData.map(item => item.header || item.name);
};
sortAndGroup().then(result => console.log(result));