I am working on Ember.js
and i have a select element which is set to send value "onchange" i am receiving the value without any problem ..
But i want to save every selection into an array and display it on the fly in labels
Here is my template.hbs
<div class="panel-body">
<div class="form-group">
<select name="services" id="services" class="form-control" onchange={{action 'setValue' value="target.value"}}>
<option> Select Services </option>
{{#each services as |service|}}
<option value="{{service.name}}">{{service.name}}</option>
{{/each}}
</select>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
{{selectedService}}
{{#each selectedService as |selection index|}}
<span class="label label-primary">{{index}} {{selection}}</span>
{{/each}}
</div>
</div>
and here is my controller
actions: {
setValue(ser){
var selectedService = [];
this.set('selectedService', ser);
selectedService.pushObject(ser);
console.log(selectedService);
}
i tried to log "selectedService[1]" and select two items but it's not working it keeps on overriding the first item :(
The reason with your case is you are constantly setting the selectedService to a new array. Instead of that; you need to get the selectedService of the controller and push to it. I mean the following:
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
selectedService: [],
actions: {
setValue(ser){
this.get('selectedService').pushObject(ser);
}
}
});
You initialize the selectedService once for the controller and can constantly push to the same array.
Can you please check the following twiddle, I guess this is close to what you want.
Related
I have a dropdown select with some options to filter the displayed list according to the selected option.
<form class="list">
<label class="item item-select">
<span class="input-label">Select career</span>
<select ng-model="searchFromSelect">
<option></option>
<option>Admin</option>
<option>IT</option>
<option>Transport</option>
</select>
</label>
<ion-item ng-repeat="career in careers | filter:searchFromSelect" class="item-icon-right balanced" ng-click="openCareer(career)">{{ career.AREA }}
<i class="icon ion-ios-arrow-right"></i>
</ion-item>
</form>
controller
$scope.vagas = response.data;
console.log : {"data":[{"ID":"1","AREA":"Admin","Benefits":"Transport"},{"ID":"2","AREA":"IT","Benefits":"Transport"}]}
How can I make it more accurate to show me the list items according only to "AREA"?
Note that if I choose Transport, it displays both "Admin" and "IT" because "Transport" is a benefit from them.
I was trying to use "strict" like here but it did not work.
According to the filter filter documentation, you can specify your filter expression as an object. To filter only on AREA properties, use :
ng-repeat="career in `careers| filter:{AREA: searchFromSelect}"
I have 2 models Tour.php
public function Itinerary()
{
return $this->hasMany('App\Itinerary', 'tour_id');
}
and Itinerary.php
public function tour()
{
return $this->belongsTo('App\Tour', 'tour_id');
}
tours table:
id|title|content
itineraries table:
id|tour_id|day|itinerary
In tour-edit.blade.php view I have used vue js to create or add and remove input field for day and plan dynamically.
Code in tour-create.blade.php
<div class="row input-margin" id="repeat">
<div class="col-md-12">
<div class="row" v-for="row in rows">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-2">
<label >Day:</label>
<input type="text" name="day[]"
class="form-control">
</div>
<div class="col-md-8">
{{ Form::label('itinerary', " Tour itinerary:", ['class' => 'form-label-margin'])}}
{{ Form::textarea('itinerary[]',null, ['class' => 'form-control','id' => 'itinerary']) }}
</div>
<div class="col-md-2">
<button class="btn btn-danger" #click.prevent="deleteOption(row)">
<i class="fa fa-trash"></i></button>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<button class="btn btn-primary add" #click.prevent="addNewOption" >
<i class="fa fa-plus"></i> Add Field</button>
</div>
</div>
</div>
I want to populate these fields with their respective data. But all data i.e itinerary belonging to a tour are being displayed in itinerary textbox in JSON format.
My vue js sript is:
<script>
var App = new Vue({
el: '#repeat',
data: {
day:1 ,
rows:[
#foreach ($tour->itinerary as $element)
{day: '{{$element->day}}', plan: '{{$element->plan}}'},
#endforeach
]
},
methods: {
addNewOption: function() {
var self = this;
self.rows.push({"day": "","itinerary":""});
},
deleteOption: function(row) {
var self = this;
self.rows.splice(row,1);
},
}
});
</script>
I would avoid mixing blade into JavaScript, instead the best option is to make an ajax call to an api route which returns your data in json, which can then be processed by Vue:
methods:{
getItinerary(){
axios.get('api/itinerary').then(response => {
this.itinerary = response.data;
})
}
}
However, with this approach you will likely need to use vue-router rather than laravel web routes, which puts us into SPA territory.
If that's not an option (i.e. you still want to use blade templates), you should take a look at this answer I gave the other day which shows you how to init data from your blade templates.
What you seem to be doing is using laravel's form model binding to populate your forms, not Vue, so your model data is not bound to the view. So, you will need to decide which one you want to use. If it's vue you just want to use a normal form and bind the underlying data to it using v-model:
Now any updates in the view will automatically be updated by Vue. I've put together a JSFiddle that assumes you will want to continue using Laravel web routes and blade templates to show you one approach to this problem: https://jsfiddle.net/w6qhLtnh/
I have projects and workflows with separate collections.
collections:
Project = new Meteor.Collection("project");
Workflow = new Meteor.Collection("workflow");
After creating project, I am selecting project in the form and displaying Work flow card.
HTML:
<!-- Workflow Card -->
<div id="wCard">
{{#each workflow}}
**<div class="pheader">
<h2>{{project}}</h2>
<hr width="100%">
</div>**
<br>
<div class="workflowcard">
<div class="module-card">
<div class="card-header wfmodule">{{workflowTitle}}</div>
<div class="casting">
<div class="assigned-tag">Assigned To:</div>
<div class="assigned-to">{{team}}<hr></div>
<div class="actions">No Actions Created</div>
</div>
<div class="due">
Due on:
<div>
<div class="day-stamp" >{{weekday d_date}}</div>
<div class="date-stamp">{{date d_date}}</div>
<div class="month-stamp">{{month d_date}}</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="btn-box showmuloption">
<button type="edit" class="editw" style="display:none">Edit Workflow</button>
<button type="hide" class="hidew" style="display:none">Hide Actions</button>
<div class="actionBtn"><button class="btn-wf stage-blue-wf button-x-small-wf" id="newAction">New Action</button></div>
</div>
</div>
{{/each}}
</div>
.JS:
Template.workflow.helpers({
getWorkflow: function(){
return Workflow.find();
},
user: function(){
return Meteor.users.find({});
},
getNewaction: function(){
return Newaction.find();
},
});
Now the workflow cards are displaying in a list. I want to display workflows according to projects. If I select a project, the workflow should go to that project, and I create another workflow with same project, it should display in that project. And if I select another project, the workflow should display in that related project.
Please help through this.
I use reactive varrible for this.
At first you need add meteor package:
$ meteor add reactive-var
Your form with project selecting might look like this:
<select id="project" value="{{getProject}}">
{{#each getProjectsList}}
<option id='{{_id}}' value="{{_id}}">{{projectname}}</option>
{{/each}}
</select>
Don't forget create helpers getProject and getProjectsList.
Now it's time for reactive varrible, you can initialise this in onCreated event.
Template.workflow.onCreated(function() {
var instance = this;
instance.projectId = new ReactiveVar(null);
});
When you change selected project, you should change you reactive varrible.
Template.workflow.events({
'change #project': function(){
Template.instance().projectId.set($("#project").val());
});
Every workflow need to have field with project id. You get workflows list like this
{{#each getWorkflows}}
And there is helper for getting workflow's list:
Template.workflow.helpers({
getWorkflows: function() {
var id = Template.instance().projectId.get();
return Workflow.find({projectId: id});
},
...// another helpers
})
So, when you will change project in form, list of workflow also will change, because it depends on reactive var. Also you can sibscribe only needed workflow object, and not all collection.
I hope this will helpfull to someone.
i want to show and hide a div based on selection from the drop down , here is my code, this is my html code for dropdown which fetches the values from the "selectItemsFilterCriteria" json structure
<select ng-model="appointment" ng-change="changeme()" ng-options="item.name for item in selectItemsFilterCriteria">
<option ng-option value="" >Filter Criteria</option>
</select>
this is my changeme() function created inside a controller
$scope.changeme = function() {
$scope.appointment = $scope.items[0];
}
this is code for my div that is to be show or hide , right now my code is working on selection of first option from drop down it is showing me the div but the problem is that its not hiding that div on the selection of any other option from the dropdown list, kindly tell me where i m doing wrong??
<div class="mycontainer" ng-show=appointment >
<div class="left-nav">
<accordion close-others="true">
<accordion-group ng-repeat="item in pagedItems[currentPage] |filter:{name:item.name}| orderBy:sortingOrder:reverse">
<accordion-heading>
<table>
<tr class="odd" ng-click="showDataDetail=!showDataDetail" style="cursor: pointer">
<td><p class="lead-name">{{item.name}}</p>
<p class="call-up-icon">{{item.phoneNo}} </p>
<p>Lead Date : 07/02/2015</p></td>
<td><p></p>
<p class="blue-txt">{{item.trade}}</p>
<p class="fl cstm-wdth">GNU09</p>
<p class="fl">{{item.time}}</p>
<div class="cb"></div>
</td>
<td><p>Today</p>
<p>C#SQL</p>
<p class="blue-remark-icon"></p></td>
</tr>
</table>
</accordion-heading>
<div>{{item.data}}</div>
</accordion-group>
</accordion>
</div>
</div>
items array:
$scope.selectItemsFilterCriteria = [
{id:1 , name:"Appointments Scheduled"},
{id:2 , name:"fresh leads"}
];
Basically the problem is with your ng-change function call,
$scope.changeme = function() {
$scope.appointment = $scope.items[0];
}
You are setting appointment to first value of items array. Hence whenever you change the options, the function sets it back to first option , in turn the div is shown.
Please remove the ng-change function and try.
Remove the $scope.changeme() function. It is not necessary.
Since you are using ng-model on select whatever option you select will get assigned to the ng-model i.e appointment in your case.
Here is the plunkr example
I'm listing an array of objects saved into Localstorage in a table-like layout.
Each row displays data saved in a particular object. I want to be able to edit and update certain properties from the object once it has already been saved into LocalStorage.
This is how a couple of my objects looks like:
[{
"date":"2014 10 16",
"time":"20.22",
"car":"396",
"driver":"Seb",
"from":"A",
"destination":"B",
"pax":"3",
"arrival":"23.10"
},
{
"date":"2014 10 16",
"time":"23.22",
"car":"46",
"driver":"Eric",
"from":"C",
"destination":"E",
"pax":"3",
"arrival":"00.10"
}]
So far my frontend code displaying the Destination property looks like this:
HTML
<div class="col-md-3"
ng-show="editItem == false"
ng-hide="editItem">{{record.destination}}</div>
// Shows current value
<div class="col-md-3"
ng-show="editItem == true"
ng-hide="!editItem">
<select class="form-control"
ng-model="locationList2"
ng-options="location.place for location in locationlist | orderBy:'place'">
<option value="">Destination</option>
</select>
</div>
// Shows select with options to be picked to update property
<div class="col-md-1">
<button ng-click="editItem = !editItem"
ng-show="!editItem">Edit</button>
<button ng-click="editData(record); editItem = !editItem"
ng-show="editItem">Ok</button>
</div>
//Toggles between current value and select and triggers editData function
Relevant JS:
$scope.editData = function (record) {
record.destination = $scope.locationList2;
jsonToRecordLocalStorage($scope.recordlist);
}
So far when I trigger editData it just deletes the Destination property, it doesn't update it with the model of locationList2 from the Select.
What am I missing?
EDIT
Here's the complete ng-repeat piece of code:
<div class="row msf-row" ng-repeat="record in recordlist | filter: search">
<div class="col-md-1">{{record.time}}</div>
<div class="col-md-1"><strong>{{record.car}}</strong></div>
<div class="col-md-1">{{record.driver}}</div>
<div class="col-md-3">{{record.from}}</div>
<div class="col-md-3"
ng-show="editItem == false"
ng-hide="editItem">
{{record.destination}}
</div>
<div class="col-md-3"
ng-show="editItem == true"
ng-hide="!editItem">
<select class="form-control"
ng-model="locationList2"
ng-options="location.place for location in locationlist | orderBy:'place'">
<option value="">Destination</option>
</select>
</div>
<div class="col-md-1">{{record.pax}}</div>
<div class="col-md-1">
<button
ng-click="editItem = !editItem"
ng-show="!editItem">
<i class="fa fa-pencil"></i>
</button>
<button
ng-click="editData(record); editItem = !editItem"
ng-show="editItem">
<i class="fa fa-check"></i>
</button>
</div>
</div>
Also, I here's a Plunkr to ilustrate the issue!
Add a driver, car code and location before starting to see the app running and the mentioned problem.
You could use angular-local-storage as an abstraction over LocalStorage API.
If you want to just hack it, you can do something along localStorage.setItem('data', JSON.stringify(data)) when setting data and use JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('data')) to extract it. LocalStorage doesn't deal with objects by default so we have to serialize it.
Regardless of the solution you choose, it could be a good idea to extend your edit a bit:
$scope.editData = function (recordlist) {
$scope.recordlist.destination = $scope.locationList2;
// replace whole LocalStorage data here now. no need to "patch" it
updateLocalStorage('data', <data containing your objects goes here>);
}
If you have multiple ways to modify the data and want to avoid explicit update, you could set up a watcher instead:
$scope.$watch(<data name goes here>, function(newVal) {
// update your LocalStorage now
});
Why it fails with ng-repeat?
The reason you see the behavior is quite simple. $scope.locationList2 is a single variable that gets bound for each member created by ng-repeat. That explains why it stays empty during edit.
You will need to bind the data using some other way. Consider binding it directly to your record models. Example: AngularJS - Using $index in ng-options .
Solution
The original code had bits like this:
JS:
$scope.editData = function (record) {
record.destination = $scope.location;
jsonToRecordLocalStorage($scope.recordlist);
};
HTML:
<select class="form-control" ng-model="location" ng-options="location.place for location in locationlist | orderBy:'place'">
<option value="">Destination</option>
</select>
Note that the markup is inside a ng-repeat and effectively each item created by it points at the same location! This isn't good.
To make it work I changed it like this:
JS:
$scope.editData = function () {
jsonToRecordLocalStorage($scope.recordlist);
};
HTML:
<select class="form-control" ng-model="record.destination" ng-options="location.place as location.place for location in locationlist | orderBy:'place'">
<option value="">Destination</option>
</select>
As mentioned above the JS could be replaced by a watcher. The important thing to note here is that I bind the data directly to the records. That avoid hassle at editData and more importantly gets rid of the problematic ng-model reference.