Develop Reference

Node js : execute function with all iteration

Maybe this is a general issue, and i need a solution to my case : due to the non blocking aspect of javascript , I don't find how can I execute my function with all iteration in for loop , and here is my example ,
var text_list=[]
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
var element = array[index];
tesseract.process("img"+i+".jpg", options, function (err, text) {
if (err) {
return console.log("An error occured: ", err);
}
text_list.push(text)
});
}
console.log(text_list) //
And the result as if I do :
tesseract.process("img"+9+".jpg"...
tesseract.process("img"+9+".jpg"...
tesseract.process("img"+9+".jpg"...
.
.
.
and what i need is :
tesseract.process("img"+0+".jpg"...
tesseract.process("img"+1+".jpg"...
tesseract.process("img"+2+".jpg"...
.
.
.

Your question does not really explain what result you are getting and your code looks like it's missing parts of the code. So, all I can really do here to help is to explain generically (using your code where possible) how to solve this class of problem.
If you are ending up with a lot of results that all reference the last value of i in your loop, then you are probably trying to reference i in an async callback but because the callback is called sometime later, the for loop has already finished long before the callback executes. Thus, your value of i is sitting on the last value it would have in the for loop. But, your question doesn't actually show code that does that, so this is just a guess based on the limited result you describe. To solve that type of issue, you have make sure you're separately keeping track of i for each iteration of the loop. There are many ways to do that. In ES6, using let in the for loop definition will solve that entire issue for you. One can also construct a closure, use .forEach(), etc...
Async operations with a loop require extra work and coding to deal with. The modern solution is to convert your async operations to use promises and then use features such as Promise.all() to both tell you when all the async operations are done and to keep the results in order for you.
You can also code it manually without promises. Here's a manual version:
const len = 10;
let text_list = new Array(10);
let doneCnt = 0;
let errFlag = false;
// using let here so each invocation of the loop gets its own value of i
for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) {
tesseract.process("img"+i+".jpg", options, function (err, text) {
if (err) {
console.log("An error occured: ", err);
// make sure err is wrapped in error object
// so you can tell errors in text_list array from values
if (!(err instanceof Error)) {
err = new Error(err);
}
text_list[i] = err;
errFlag = true;
} else {
text_list[i] = text;
}
// see if we're done with all the requests
if (++doneCnt === len) {
if (errFlag) {
// deal with situation where there were some errors
} else {
// put code here to process finished text_list array
}
}
});
}
// you can't process results here because async operations are not
// done yet when code here runs
Or, using promises, you can make a "promisified" version of tesseract.process() and then use promise functionality to track multiple async operations:
// make promisified version of tesseract.process()
tesseract.processP = function(img, options) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
tesseract.process(img, options, function(err, text) {
if (err) {
reject(err)
} else {
resolve(text);
}
});
});
}
const len = 10;
let promises = [];
for (let i = 0; i < len; i++) {
promises.push(tesseract.processP("img"+i+".jpg", options));
}
Promise.all(promises).then(function(results) {
// process results array here (in order)
}).catch(function(err) {
// handle error here
});

Asynchronously Write Large Array of Objects to Redis with Node.js

I created a Node.js script that creates a large array of randomly generated test data and I want to write it to a Redis DB. I am using the redis client library and the async library. Initially, I tried executing a redisClient.hset(...) command within the for loop that generates my test data, but after some Googling, I learned the Redis method is asynchronous while the for loop is synchronous. After seeing some questions on StackOverflow, I can't get it to work the way I want.
I can write to Redis without a problem with a small array or larger, such as one with 100,000 items. However, it does not work well when I have an array of 5,000,000 items. I end up not having enough memory because the redis commands seem to be queueing up, but aren't executed until after async.each(...) is complete and the node process does not exit. How do I get the Redis client to actually execute the commands, as I call redisClient.hset(...)?
Here a fragment of the code I am working with.
var redis = require('redis');
var async = require('async');
var redisClient = redis.createClient(6379, '192.168.1.150');
var testData = generateTestData();
async.each(testData, function(item, callback) {
var someData = JSON.stringify(item.data);
redisClient.hset('item:'+item.key, 'hashKey', someData, function(err, reply) {
console.log("Item was persisted. Result: " +reply);
});
callback();
}, function(err) {
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
console.log.info("Items have been persisted to Redis.");
}
});

You could call eachLimit to ensure you are not executing too many redisClient.hset calls at the same time.
To avoid overflowing the call stack you could do setTimeout(callback, 0); instead of calling the callback directly.
edit:
Forget what I said about setTimeout. All you need to do is call the callback at the right place. Like so:
redisClient.hset('item:'+item.key, 'hashKey', someData, function(err, reply) {
console.log("Item was persisted. Result: " +reply);
callback();
});
You may still want to use eachLimit and try out which limit works best.
By the way - async.each is supposed to be used only on code that schedules the invocation of the callback in the javascript event queue (e.g. timer, network, etc) . Never use it on code that calls the callback immediately as was the case in your original code.
edit:
You can implement your own eachLimit function that instead of an array takes a generator as it's first argument. Then you write a generator function to create the test data. For that to work, node needs to be run with "node --harmony code.js".
function eachLimit(generator, limit, iterator, callback) {
var isError = false, j;
function startNextSetOfActions() {
var elems = [];
for(var i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
j = generator.next();
if(j.done) break;
elems.push(j.value);
}
var activeActions = elems.length;
if(activeActions === 0) {
callback(null);
}
elems.forEach(function(elem) {
iterator(elem, function(err) {
if(isError) return;
else if(err) {
callback(err);
isError = true;
return;
}
activeActions--;
if(activeActions === 0) startNextSetOfActions();
});
});
}
startNextSetOfActions();
}
function* testData() {
while(...) {
yield new Data(...);
}
}
eachLimit(testData(), 10, function(item, callback) {
var someData = JSON.stringify(item.data);
redisClient.hset('item:'+item.key, 'hashKey', someData, function(err, reply) {
if(err) callback(err);
else {
console.log("Item was persisted. Result: " +reply);
callback();
}
});
}, function(err) {
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
console.log.info("Items have been persisted to Redis.");
}
});

Illegal break statement (Node.js)

Trying to find unique ID in Node.js and MongoDB, by creating a while loop that queries MongoDB for existing IDs, until a unique value is found. If the ID is already in use, a number is incremented on the end until Mongo returns nothing.
Everything is working, except for the break; statement when a unique ID is found. Node.js returns: SyntaxError: Illegal break statement
The code:
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':uniqueIDer}, function(err, data){
//if ID exists already
if (data.id){
var uniqueNumber = 1;
while (1) {
var uniqueNum_string = uniqueNumber.toString();
var newUnique = data.id + uniqueNum_string;
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':newUnique}, function(err, data){
if (data.id){
uniqueNumber++;
}
else {
saveLandmark(newUnique);
break;
}
});
}
}
else {
saveLandmark(uniqueIDer);
}
});
What am I doing wrong?
EDIT:
Here's the fixed up code using async if anyone needs it :)
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':uniqueIDer}, function(err, data){
if (data){
var uniqueNumber = 1;
var newUnique;
async.forever(function (next) {
var uniqueNum_string = uniqueNumber.toString();
newUnique = data.id + uniqueNum_string;
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':newUnique,'world':worldVal}, function(err, data){
if (data){
console.log('entry found!');
uniqueNumber++;
next();
}
else {
console.log('entry not found!');
next('unique!'); // This is where the looping is stopped
}
});
},
function () {
saveLandmark(newUnique);
});
}
else {
saveLandmark(uniqueIDer);
}
});

Your break statement is not inside the body of a loop. It is, instead, inside the body of a function, namely the findOne callback. To see this more clearly, it can be helpful to temporarily use a named function as your callback handler:
var cb = function(err, data){
if (data.id){
uniqueNumber++;
}
else {
saveLandmark(newUnique);
break; // not inside a loop!
}
};
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':uniqueIDer}, function(err, data){
//if ID exists already
if (data.id){
var uniqueNumber = 1;
while (1) {
var uniqueNum_string = uniqueNumber.toString();
var newUnique = data.id + uniqueNum_string;
db.collection('landmarks').findOne({'id':newUnique}, cb);
}
}
else {
saveLandmark(uniqueIDer);
}
});
It's pretty clear now that the break in the callback function body is not inside a loop! I've also made things break in other ways because the uniqueNumber and newUnique values are no longer in scope, but that's a different issue. :) The important thing to see here is that a function introduces a "hard" boundary in your code that can be difficult to see based purely on the syntax of the language. This is one of the reasons why this callback style of programming can be so tricky to get right.
In fact, it's much more difficult to do this than your original attempt at the code would imply. You'll need to have a way of passing a success signal up through possibly arbitrary layers of callbacks as you repeatedly call findOne and analyze the result (asynchronously).
You might get some help with this by using the excellent async library, for example https://github.com/caolan/async#whilst.

Creating variable array object with for loop

I have a for loop that pulls data from a MySQL server. I would like the four values to be put into variables so I can use them later. Here's the code I have; for some reason, it says thev is undefined?
create();
function create(){
for(var i=0;i<4;i++){
var thev=[];
client.query('SELECT curattend FROM table1 WHERE ind=?',[i], function(err,result){
thev[i] = result[0].curattend;
});
}
return thev;
}
console.log(thev[2]);
I would appreciate any advice on this problem.

There are a lot of problems here.
thev is local to create. You don’t assign the return value of create to anything, so it’s still not going to be defined.
var thev = []; should not be inside the for loop. It’ll only end up containing one element. Or it would, but…
The callback to query is not just there for fun; it’s an asynchronous call, and is 100% sure to not have happened by the time you actually return from the function.
I would just do it using the async library:
function range(start, end) {
var result = [];
while(start < end) {
result.push(start);
start++;
}
return result;
}
async.map(range(0, 4), function(i, callback) {
client.query('SELECT curattend FROM table1 WHERE ind = ?', [i], function(err, result) {
if(err) return callback(err);
callback(null, result[0].curattend);
});
}, function(err, thev) {
// Continue
});

node-mysql timing

i have a recursive query like this (note: this is just an example):
var user = function(data)
{
this.minions = [];
this.loadMinions = function()
{
_user = this;
database.query('select * from users where owner='+data.id,function(err,result,fields)
{
for(var m in result)
{
_user.minions[result[m].id] = new user(result[m]);
_user.minions[result[m].id].loadMinions();
}
}
console.log("loaded all minions");
}
}
currentUser = new user(ID);
for (var m in currentUser.minions)
{
console.log("minion found!");
}
this don't work because the timmings are all wrong, the code don't wait for the query.
i've tried to do this:
var MyQuery = function(QueryString){
var Data;
var Done = false;
database.query(QueryString, function(err, result, fields) {
Data = result;
Done = true;
});
while(Done != true){};
return Data;
}
var user = function(data)
{
this.minions = [];
this.loadMinions = function()
{
_user = this;
result= MyQuery('select * from users where owner='+data.id);
for(var m in result)
{
_user.minions[result[m].id] = new user(result[m]);
_user.minions[result[m].id].loadMinions();
}
console.log("loaded all minions");
}
}
currentUser = new user(ID);
for (var m in currentUser.minions)
{
console.log("minion found!");
}
but he just freezes on the while, am i missing something?

The first hurdle to solving your problem is understanding that I/O in Node.js is asynchronous. Once you know how this applies to your problem the recursive part will be much easier (especially if you use a flow control library like Async or Step).
Here is an example that does some of what you're trying to do (minus the recursion). Personally, I would avoid recursively loading a possibly unknown number/depth of records like that; Instead load them on demand, like in this example:
var User = function(data) {
this.data = data
this.minions;
};
User.prototype.getMinions = function(primaryCallback) {
var that = this; // scope handle
if(this.minions) { // bypass the db query if results cached
return primaryCallback(null, this.minions);
}
// Callback invoked by database.query when it has the records
var aCallback = function(error, results, fields) {
if(error) {
return primaryCallback(error);
}
// This is where you would put your recursive minion initialization
// The problem you are going to have is callback counting, using a library
// like async or step would make this party much much easier
that.minions = results; // bypass the db query after this
primaryCallback(null, results);
}
database.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE owner = ' + data.id, aCallback);
};
var user = new User(someData);
user.getMinions(function(error, minions) {
if(error) {
throw error;
}
// Inside the function invoked by primaryCallback(...)
minions.forEach(function(minion) {
console.log('found this minion:', minion);
});
});
The biggest thing to note in this example are the callbacks. The database.query(...) is asynchronous and you don't want to tie up the event loop waiting for it to finish. This is solved by providing a callback, aCallback, to the query, which is executed when the results are ready. Once that callback fires and after you perform whatever processing you want to do on the records you can fire the primaryCallback with the final results.

Each Node.js process is single-threaded, so the line
while(Done != true){};
takes over the thread, and the callback that would have set Done to true never gets run because the thead is blocked on an infinite loop.
You need to refactor your program so that code that depends on the results of the query is included within the callback itself. For example, make MyQuery take a callback argument:
MyQuery = function(QueryString, callback){
Then call the callback at the end of your database.query callback -- or even supply it as the database.query callback.

The freezing is unfortunately correct behaviour, as Node is single-threaded.
You need a scheduler package to fix this. Personally, I have been using Fibers-promise for this kind of issue. You might want to look at this or another promise library or at async