Develop Reference

Public file is missing from build/public in Webpack [duplicate]

I'm trying to move from Gulp to Webpack. In Gulp I have task which copies all files and folders from /static/ folder to /build/ folder. How to do the same with Webpack? Do I need some plugin?

Requiring assets using the file-loader module is the way webpack is intended to be used (source). However, if you need greater flexibility or want a cleaner interface, you can also copy static files directly using my copy-webpack-plugin (npm, Github). For your static to build example:
const CopyWebpackPlugin = require('copy-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = {
context: path.join(__dirname, 'your-app'),
plugins: [
new CopyWebpackPlugin({
patterns: [
{ from: 'static' }
]
})
]
};
Compatibility note: If you're using an old version of webpack like webpack#4.x.x, use copy-webpack-plugin#6.x.x. Otherwise use latest.

You don't need to copy things around, webpack works different than gulp. Webpack is a module bundler and everything you reference in your files will be included. You just need to specify a loader for that.
So if you write:
var myImage = require("./static/myImage.jpg");
Webpack will first try to parse the referenced file as JavaScript (because that's the default). Of course, that will fail. That's why you need to specify a loader for that file type. The file- or url-loader for instance take the referenced file, put it into webpack's output folder (which should be build in your case) and return the hashed url for that file.
var myImage = require("./static/myImage.jpg");
console.log(myImage); // '/build/12as7f9asfasgasg.jpg'
Usually loaders are applied via the webpack config:
// webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
...
module: {
loaders: [
{ test: /\.(jpe?g|gif|png|svg|woff|ttf|wav|mp3)$/, loader: "file" }
]
}
};
Of course you need to install the file-loader first to make this work.

If you want to copy your static files you can use the file-loader in this way :
for html files :
in webpack.config.js :
module.exports = {
...
module: {
loaders: [
{ test: /\.(html)$/,
loader: "file?name=[path][name].[ext]&context=./app/static"
}
]
}
};
in your js file :
require.context("./static/", true, /^\.\/.*\.html/);
./static/ is relative to where your js file is.
You can do the same with images or whatever.
The context is a powerful method to explore !!

One advantage that the aforementioned copy-webpack-plugin brings that hasn't been explained before is that all the other methods mentioned here still bundle the resources into your bundle files (and require you to "require" or "import" them somewhere). If I just want to move some images around or some template partials, I don't want to clutter up my javascript bundle file with useless references to them, I just want the files emitted in the right place. I haven't found any other way to do this in webpack. Admittedly it's not what webpack originally was designed for, but it's definitely a current use case.
(#BreakDS I hope this answers your question - it's only a benefit if you want it)

Webpack 5 adds Asset Modules which are essentially replacements for common file loaders. I've copied a relevant portion of the documentation below:
asset/resource emits a separate file and exports the URL. Previously achievable by using file-loader.
asset/inline exports a data URI of the asset. Previously achievable by using url-loader.
asset/source exports the source code of the asset. Previously achievable by using raw-loader.
asset automatically chooses between exporting a data URI and emitting a separate file. Previously achievable by using url-loader with asset size limit.
To add one in you can make your config look like so:
// webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
...
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(jpe?g|gif|png|svg|woff|ttf|wav|mp3)$/,
type: "asset/resource"
}
]
}
};
To control how the files get output, you can use templated paths.
In the config you can set the global template here:
// webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
...
output: {
...
assetModuleFilename: '[path][name].[hash][ext][query]'
}
}
To override for a specific set of assets, you can do this:
// webpack.config.js
module.exports = {
...
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.(jpe?g|gif|png|svg|woff|ttf|wav|mp3)$/,
type: "asset/resource"
generator: {
filename: '[path][name].[hash][ext][query]'
}
}
]
}
};
The provided templating will result in filenames that look like build/images/img.151cfcfa1bd74779aadb.png. The hash can be useful for cache busting etc. You should modify to your needs.

Above suggestions are good. But to try to answer your question directly I'd suggest using cpy-cli in a script defined in your package.json.
This example expects node to somewhere on your path. Install cpy-cli as a development dependency:
npm install --save-dev cpy-cli
Then create a couple of nodejs files. One to do the copy and the other to display a checkmark and message.
copy.js
#!/usr/bin/env node
var shelljs = require('shelljs');
var addCheckMark = require('./helpers/checkmark');
var path = require('path');
var cpy = path.join(__dirname, '../node_modules/cpy-cli/cli.js');
shelljs.exec(cpy + ' /static/* /build/', addCheckMark.bind(null, callback));
function callback() {
process.stdout.write(' Copied /static/* to the /build/ directory\n\n');
}
checkmark.js
var chalk = require('chalk');
/**
* Adds mark check symbol
*/
function addCheckMark(callback) {
process.stdout.write(chalk.green(' ✓'));
callback();
}
module.exports = addCheckMark;
Add the script in package.json. Assuming scripts are in <project-root>/scripts/
...
"scripts": {
"copy": "node scripts/copy.js",
...
To run the sript:
npm run copy

The way I load static images and fonts:
module: {
rules: [
....
{
test: /\.(jpe?g|png|gif|svg)$/i,
/* Exclude fonts while working with images, e.g. .svg can be both image or font. */
exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/assets/fonts'),
use: [{
loader: 'file-loader',
options: {
name: '[name].[ext]',
outputPath: 'images/'
}
}]
},
{
test: /\.(woff(2)?|ttf|eot|svg|otf)(\?v=\d+\.\d+\.\d+)?$/,
/* Exclude images while working with fonts, e.g. .svg can be both image or font. */
exclude: path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/assets/images'),
use: [{
loader: 'file-loader',
options: {
name: '[name].[ext]',
outputPath: 'fonts/'
},
}
]
}
Don't forget to install file-loader to have that working.

You can write bash in your package.json:
# package.json
{
"name": ...,
"version": ...,
"scripts": {
"build": "NODE_ENV=production npm run webpack && cp -v <this> <that> && echo ok",
...
}
}

Most likely you should use CopyWebpackPlugin which was mentioned in kevlened answer. Alternativly for some kind of files like .html or .json you can also use raw-loader or json-loader. Install it via npm install -D raw-loader and then what you only need to do is to add another loader to our webpack.config.js file.
Like:
{
test: /\.html/,
loader: 'raw'
}
Note: Restart the webpack-dev-server for any config changes to take effect.
And now you can require html files using relative paths, this makes it much easier to move folders around.
template: require('./nav.html')

I was stuck here too. copy-webpack-plugin worked for me.
However, 'copy-webpack-plugin' was not necessary in my case (i learned later).
webpack ignores root paths
example
<img src="/images/logo.png'>
Hence, to make this work without using 'copy-webpack-plugin'
use '~' in paths
<img src="~images/logo.png'>
'~' tells webpack to consider 'images' as a module
note:
you might have to add the parent directory of images directory in
resolve: {
modules: [
'parent-directory of images',
'node_modules'
]
}
Visit https://vuejs-templates.github.io/webpack/static.html

The webpack config file (in webpack 2) allows you to export a promise chain, so long as the last step returns a webpack config object. See promise configuration docs. From there:
webpack now supports returning a Promise from the configuration file. This allows to do async processing in you configuration file.
You could create a simple recursive copy function that copies your file, and only after that triggers webpack. E.g.:
module.exports = function(){
return copyTheFiles( inpath, outpath).then( result => {
return { entry: "..." } // Etc etc
} )
}

lets say all your static assets are in a folder "static" at the root level and you want copy them to the build folder maintaining the structure of subfolder, then
in your entry file) just put
//index.js or index.jsx
require.context("!!file?name=[path][name].[ext]&context=./static!../static/", true, /^\.\/.*\.*/);

In my case I used webpack for a wordpress plugin to compress js files, where the plugin files are already compressed and need to skip from the process.
optimization: {
minimize: false,
},
externals: {
"jquery": "jQuery",
},
entry: glob.sync('./js/plugin/**.js').reduce(function (obj, el) {
obj[path.parse(el).name] = el;
return obj
}, {}),
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, './js/dist/plugin'),
filename: "[name].js",
clean: true,
},
That used to copy the js file as it is to the build folder. Using any other methods like file-loader and copy-webpack create issues with that.
Hope it will help someone.

webpack: How to inject the JS chunks in the a YAML file

I'm using webpack to modernize a legacy MVC application (symfony 1.4)
I would like to inject the JS chunks and the CSS file in a YAML file that contains several other settings.
Here is an example:
default:
foo: bar
.
.
stylesheets: [ style.db80006f5e14f38456ef.css ]
javascripts: [ runtime.d8969ec83f67a36c8877.js, npm.material.db07856eff6817abe7f2.js, main.db80006f5e14f38456ef.js ]
.
.
The html-webpack-plugin supports plugin as well. I was wondering if it would be possible with my own plugin for the html-webpack-plugin to inject the CSS files and JS files in a YAML file instead of an HTML template. I'm not sure if the html-webpack-plugin is the way to go since I don't want to manipulate an HTML file.
Maybe there is another possibility to get the names and the order of the JS chunks, plus the CSS file.
Thanks a lot in advance!

html-webpack-plugin is the way to go, you can provide your "base" yaml file as a template, and provide a templateContent function that will generate your yaml content.
Something like this:
new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
templateContent: function(params) {
return `
default:
stylesheets: [ ${params.htmlWebpackPlugin.files.css.join(',')} ]
javascripts: [ ${params.htmlWebpackPlugin.files.js.join(',')} ]
`;
},
filename: 'path-to/where/to/save/your.yaml',
inject: false, // prevents from the plugin to auto-inject html tags
});

Render multiple pages unrelated to the main app with Webpack and Mustache

I'm developing a Chrome Extension and I use Webpack to bundle it. I've got my compiled bundle, which is the main part of the app, but I also need an options page to describe the functionality. This options page has nothing to do with the bundle, it's just a static HTML file.
I must put a lot of things in that options page so I want to render that page with Mustache and define all content with JavaScript. For the most part, I've done that.
Here's my Webpack config (I've removed the parts regarding my app):
const path = require('path')
const HtmlWebpackPlugin = require('html-webpack-plugin')
module.exports = {
output: {
path: path.join(__dirname, 'extension/build/')
},
plugins: [
new HtmlWebpackPlugin({
template: './src/options/index.html',
inject: false
})
],
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.html$/,
loader: 'mustache-loader',
options: {
render: require('./src/options/index.js')
}
}
]
}
}
and in my src/index.js, I have:
require('./options/index.html')
This will open the template and render it with the data in src/options/index.js.
There's a problem with that, however. I run Webpack with webpack --watch and changes to index.js (it holds the template data) do not trigger a rebuild. Also, I would need to go through a lot of trouble to create another static HTML file in the same manner.
It would be ideal if HtmlWebpackPlugin automatically used the template I require() in my entry point so that I don't need to explicitly set it. Also, it would be great if it automatically used a js in that same location to get the data. For example:
require('./options/index.html`)
Renders the template with data from ./options/index.html.js and then emits it. It would be even better if it emitted it to a custom folder specified in the Webpack config.
Is that possible? I couldn't find a plugin/loader that does that.
Edit: I was able to partly fix the rebuild problem by specifying the render option as a function:
{
test: /\.html$/,
loader: 'mustache-loader',
options: {
render () {
var file = './src/options/index.js'
delete require.cache[require.resolve(file)]
return require(file)
}
}
}
But it still doesn't work properly. The rebuild would only trigger after I make changes to index.html. This means that if I change index.js, I need to go and save index.html as well to trigger the build.

Compiling SCSS into CSS and transpiling ES6 to ES5 simultaneously

So I have a SCSS file called style.scss. And I have an ES6 file called script.js. Both these files are in a ./src/ directory.
I want to use Webpack to take the style.scss, convert it to CSS and stick it into a folder called ./dist/ with the filename style.css. I can actually make that happen.
I also want Webpack to take the script.js, transpile to ES5, and put that in to the same ./dist/ folder with a file called script.js. I can also make that happen.
What I cannot do, is make both happen simultaneously. Is this something that Webpack can even do? In this instance I don't want all my styles putting into my JS, I specifically want them to be kept in separate files like a standard website (as that's what this is, really).
The closest I have got is this:
const ExtractTextPlugin = require('extract-text-webpack-plugin');
module.exports = {
entry: {
script: './src/script.js',
style: './src/style.scss'
},
output: {
path: './dist',
filename: '[name].js'
},
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /\.scss$/,
use: ExtractTextPlugin.extract({
fallback: "style-loader",
use: ['css-loader', 'sass-loader']
})
}
]
},
plugins: [
new ExtractTextPlugin('style.css')
] }
But this gives me a script.js file, a style.css file and ALSO a style.js file which is a mess.
Any suggestions?

You don't want to create a separate entry point for the CSS. You can either import the style.scss in your script.js or you can add it to the same entry. An entry can also be an array and webpack will include them in the same bundle, well the CSS is extracted anyway so there won't really be any additional JavaScript. Your entry would be as follows:
entry: {
script: ['./src/script.js', './src/style.scss']
},

Simple solution to share modules loaded via NPM across multiple Browserify or Webpack bundles

Pulling my hair out here looking for a simple solution to share code, required via NPM, across multiple Browserify or Webpack bundles. Thinking, is there such a thing as a file "bridge"?
This isn't due to compile time (I'm aware of watchify) but rather the desire to extract out all of my vendor specific libs into vendor.js so to keep my app.js filesize down and to not crash the browser with massive sourcemaps. Plus, I find it way cleaner should the need to view the compiled js arise. And so:
// vendor.js
require('react');
require('lodash');
require('other-npm-module');
require('another-npm-module');
Its very important that the code be loaded from NPM as opposed to Bower, or saved into some 'vendor' directory in order to be imported via a relative path and identified via a shim. I'd like to keep every library reference pulled via NPM except for my actual application source.
In app.js I keep all of my sourcecode, and via the externals array, exclude vendor libraries listed above from compilation:
// app.js
var React = require('react');
var _ = require('lodash');
var Component = React.createClass()
// ...
And then in index.html, I require both files
// index.html
<script src='vendor.js'></script>
<script src='app.js'></script>
Using Browserify or Webpack, how can I make it so that app.js can "see" into those module loaded via npm? I'm aware of creating a bundle with externals and then referencing the direct file (in, say, node_modules) via an alias, but I'm hoping to find a solution that is more automatic and less "Require.js" like.
Basically, I'm wondering if it is possible to bridge the two so that app.js can look inside vendor.js in order to resolve dependencies. This seems like a simple, straightforward operation but I can't seem to find an answer anywhere on this wide, wide web.
Thanks!

Listing all the vendor files/modules and using CommonChunkPlugin is indeed the recommended way. This gets pretty tedious though, and error prone.
Consider these NPM modules: fastclick and mprogress. Since they have not adopted the CommonJS module format, you need to give webpack a hand, like this:
require('imports?define=>false!fastclick')(document.body);
require('mprogress/mprogress.min.css');
var Mprogress = require('mprogress/mprogress.min.js'),
Now assuming you would want both fastclick and mprogress in your vendor chunk, you would probably try this:
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: ["fastclick", "mprogress", ...]
Alas, it doesn't work. You need to match the calls to require():
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: [
"imports?define=>false!fastclick",
"mprogress/mprogress.min.css",
"mprogress/mprogress.min.js",
...]
It gets old, even with some resolve.alias trickery. Here is my workaround. CommonChunkPlugin lets you specify a callback that will return whether or not you want a module to be included in the vendor chunk. If your own source code is in a specific src directory, and the rest is in the node_modules directory, just reject the modules based on their path:
var node_modules_dir = path.join(__dirname, 'node_modules'),
app_dir = path.join(__dirname, 'src');
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin(
/* chunkName= */"vendor",
/* filename= */"vendor.bundle.js"
function (module, count) {
return module.resource && module.resource.indexOf(app_dir) === -1;
}
)
]
};
Where module.resource is the path to the module being considered. You could also do the opposite, and include only the module if it is inside node_modules_dir, i.e.:
return module.resource && module.resource.indexOf(node_modules_dir) === 0;
but in my situation, I'd rather say: "put everything that is not in my source source tree in a vendor chunk".
Hope that helps.

With webpack you'd use multiple entry points and the CommonChunkPlugin.
Taken from the webpack docs:
To split your app into 2 files, say app.js and vendor.js, you can require the vendor files in vendor.js. Then pass this name to the CommonChunkPlugin as shown below.
module.exports = {
entry: {
app: "./app.js",
vendor: ["jquery", "underscore", ...],
},
output: {
filename: "bundle.js"
},
plugins: [
new webpack.optimize.CommonsChunkPlugin(
/* chunkName= */"vendor",
/* filename= */"vendor.bundle.js"
)
]
};
This will remove all modules in the vendor chunk from the app chunk. The bundle.js will now contain just your app code, without any of it’s dependencies. These are in vendor.bundle.js.
In your HTML page load vendor.bundle.js before bundle.js.
<script src="vendor.bundle.js"></script>
<script src="bundle.js"></script>

// vendor anything coming from node_modules
minChunks: module => /node_modules/.test(module.resource)
Source: https://github.com/webpack/webpack/issues/2372#issuecomment-213149173