div {
width: 50px;
}
span {
display: inline-block;
}
p {
max-height: calc(1em + 5px);
}
<div>
<span>a</span>
<span><p class="ellipsis">b</p></span>
</div>
It seems when ellipsis is applied to the p it calculates the width as if it were the full width of the div, rather than its width - width of a (as they are display: inline)
I can see when I inspect that it calculates the ... as if it were the full width of div. Does anyone know a workaround for this (it works for the normal cases I use it in)?
Related
I accidentally discovered that scrollTop, and scrollLeft on an element work even when an element is overflow: hidden. Can this behaviour be relied on?
Supposedly scrollTop, and scrollLeft are supposed to be zero for elements without scrollbars, and setting them on such elements is supposed to have no effect.
Yes, even if an element has CSS overflow set to hidden,
Javascript Element.scrollTop(), Element.scrollLeft() allows you to manipulate the element's scroll position if the element contains overflowing children.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/scrollLeft
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/scrollTop
Here's a quick use case:
Animate gallery using scrollLeft
var GAL = $("#gal"),
n = GAL.find(">*").length;
c = 0;
$("button").on("click", function(){
GAL.animate({ scrollLeft: (++c%n) * GAL.width() });
});
#gal {
height: 40vh;
overflow: hidden; /* !! */
white-space:nowrap;
font-size: 0;
} #gal>* {
font-size: 1rem;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
width: 100%;
height: inherit;
background: 50% / cover;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="gal">
<div style="background-image:url(//placehold.it/800x600/cf5);"></div>
<div style="background-image:url(//placehold.it/800x600/f0f);"></div>
<div style="background-image:url(//placehold.it/800x600/444);"></div>
</div>
<button>scrollLeft</button>
Not sure yet why Chrome does not do the following but:
Firefox will remember your gallery scroll-position on historyBack (navigating back to the page where you scrolled your gallery)
I know we can use calc when lengths are defined:
flex-basis: calc(33.33% - 60px);
left: calc(50% - 25px);
height: calc(100em/5);
But what if a length is variable?
height: calc(100% - <<header with variable height>>);
OR
width: calc(100% - 50px - <<box with variable width>>);
Is there a standard way to do this in CSS?
I know the overall task is possible with flexbox and tables, but I'm wondering if CSS offers a simpler method. Flexbox, tables and simple Javascript are acceptable alternatives.
height demo
width demo
You can use CSS tables:
.wrapper {
display: table;
width: 100%;
margin: 15px 0;
}
.horizontal.wrapper > div {
display: table-cell;
white-space: nowrap; /* Prevent line wrapping */
border: 1px solid;
}
.left { width: 100px } /* Minimum width of 100px */
.center { width: 0; } /* Width given by contents */
.vertical.wrapper { height: 200px; }
.vertical.wrapper > div {
display: table-row;
}
.vertical.wrapper > div > span {
display: table-cell;
border: 1px solid;
}
.top { height: 100px; } /* Minimum heigth of 100px */
.middle { height: 0; } /* Height given by content */
.bottom { height: 100%; } /* As tall as possible */
<div class="horizontal wrapper">
<div class="left">100px wide</div>
<div class="center">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
<div class="vertical wrapper">
<div class="top"><span>100px tall</span></div>
<div class="middle"><span>Auto height, given by contents</span></div>
<div class="bottom"><span>Remaining space</span></div>
</div>
The horizontal case can also be achieved with floats:
#wrapper, .right { overflow: hidden; } /* Establish BFC */
#wrapper > div { border: 1px solid; }
.left, .middle { float: left; }
.left { width: 100px }
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="left">100px</div>
<div class="middle">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
Flexbox can do that.
Support is IE10 and up.
JSfiddle Demo
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
#top {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
#bottom {
background-color: lightblue;
flex: 1;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="top">green box variable height</div>
<div id="bottom">blue box no longer overflows browser window</div>
</div>
I'm looking for something simple and portable. In the same way a CSS
property can be easily applied across documents, I'm looking for
something similar in terms of ease-of-application for this function.
... isolated fix is preferred.
Horizontal:
This can be achieved using CSS only. As you do not prefer a flex layout solution, the next best bet would be a table layout.
A simple CSS snippet which you could drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child { width: 100%; }
You can then add your site-specific styling to this base CSS as per site requirements. Like, nowrap etc.
Two apparent advantages of this solution are:
You do not need to change your markup and also do not need to decorate all children with classes. Just apply the class flexh to your parent div and that would be it.
Minimal Markup Required:
<div class="flexh">
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
</div>
You are not limited to just three columns. You could have as many columns as need be. The first one will have fixed width, the last one will be flexible, and all the columns in-between would get content-based widths.
Demo Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/qqq4mq23/
Demo Snippet:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
/* Override your custom styling below */
width: 80%; border: 2px solid black;
border-right: 2px dashed black;
font-size: 1em;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 15px 5px;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child {
width: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable Content Width</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable TextWidth</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' />
<p>Variable ContentWidth</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
Vertical:
This is a bit tricky to achieve without flex layout. A table layout would not work here mainly because, the table-row would not keep a fixed height as required by your use-case. The height on a table-row or table-cell is only an indicative of the minimum height required. If the space is constrained, or the content exceeds the available space, then the cell or row will increase its height depending on the content.
As per the specs here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#height-layout
The height of a 'table-row' element's box is calculated once the user
agent has all the cells in the row available: it is the maximum of the
row's computed 'height', the computed 'height' of each cell in the
row, and the minimum height (MIN) required by the cells...
...the height of a cell box is the minimum height required by the
content
This effect can be seen here: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/6eropud3/
(Resize the window pane and you will see that the first row will increase in height as the content cannot be fit into the specified height, hence defeating the purpose)
Therefore, you can restrict the height indirectly either using inner markup like a div element, or let go of the table-layout and calculate the height for the flexible one. In your use-case, you prefer not to change the markup, hence I am not proposing an inner markup.
The best-bet here would be to use the time-tested model of plain block-level divs with the height of the flexible one to be calculated. As you have already discovered that it is not possible with CSS, you will need a small JavaScript snippet to do that for you.
A simple JavaScript snippet (no jQuery) which you could wrap in a window.load and drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
/* iterate the instances on your page */
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children), // get all children
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1), // get the last child
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight; // aggregate the height
});
/* assign the calculated height on the last child */
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
The CSS snippet is more or less like the horizontal one, sans table layout, which also you could just drop into your project and just add the additional site-specific styling. Minimal markup required remains the same.
Demo Fiddle 2: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/Ltcuxdwf/
Demo Snippet:
document.addEventListener("load", flexit);
function flexit(e) {
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children),
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1),
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight;
});
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
}
div.flexv {
display: inline-table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
height: 320px; width: 20%; border: 1px solid black; font-size: 1em;
margin: 8px;
}
div.flexv > div {
display: block; height: auto; box-sizing: border-box;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 5px 15px;
}
div.flexv > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-height: 36px; height: 36px; max-height: 36px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexv > div:last-child {
height: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Content Height</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/64x72/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Text Height</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/72x48/66c' />
<p>Variable Content Height</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
Note: As pointed out by #LGSon, the display: inline-table used for the demo does not play well with Firefox. This is only for a demo and should be replaced by either block or inline-block as per your use-case.
Updated
As I commented earlier, and besides flex, this is also solvable using display: table and here is a fiddle demo I made showing that.
If a fixed top also were required for the vertical demo, here is an update of my original display:table version: fiddle demo
Sometimes I haven't been able (or didn't want) to use either flex nor tables, and I have, on and off, looked into making use of css calc() and css attr().
Both come short though, as calc() can only use +-*/ and attr() can only return a string value, which can't be computed by calc().
My suggestion, using plain javascript, is based on that these 2 methods, at some point, might be extended so we can make better use of them.
This is how I would like see them work;
width: calc(100% - attr(this.style.left))
but as they don't, and I can't add it to my css either as it wouldn't validate properly (might even break the parsing, who knows) I added a variant as an attribute on the element instead, with some quirks to make it easier to compute.
And in this case (the 2 demos) it looks like this:
//height
<div id="bottom" data-calcattr="top,height,calc(100% - toppx)">...</div>
//width
<div class="box right" data-calcattr="left,width,calc(100% - leftpx)">...</div>
Together with below script, which by no means is fully developed/tested on all property combinations, it does adjust the div's size.
In short, when runned, it take the attribute, split it into an array, take the first item value as from which property to read, the second to which property to set and the third to which the read value gets inserted/replaced and assigned to the property to be set (hmmm, still working on a better way to express this, but hopefully the script is clear enough with whats going on).
Here is a fiddle showing both the height and width demo, integrated, making use of the same script.
function calcattr() {
var els = document.querySelectorAll('[data-calcattr]');
for (i = 0; i < els.length; i++) {
var what = els[i].getAttribute('data-calcattr');
if (what) {
what = what.split(',');
var rect = els[i].getBoundingClientRect();
var parentrect = els[i].parentNode.getBoundingClientRect();
var brd = window.getComputedStyle(els[i].parentNode,null).getPropertyValue('border-' + what[0] + '-width');
what[2] = what[2].replace(what[0],parseInt(rect[what[0]]-parentrect[what[0]]) - parseInt(brd));
els[i].setAttribute("style", what[1] + ":" + what[2]);
}
}
}
IN CSS
Although I've never tried it, I believe that this would work:
.top {
height:13px;
}
.main {
height:calc(100% - var(height));
}
http://www.creativebloq.com/netmag/why-you-need-use-css-variables-91412904
IN SASS
$top_height: 50px
.main {
height: calc(100% - $top_height)
}
Sass Variable in CSS calc() function
In both cases on container css you should put:
#container {
overflow: hidden;
}
But, it will hide the information that overflows the container. I think that is the point, since you put white-space: nowrap; it means that you don't want to change the height, so you have to hide the text that can't fits the container.
I want to get the size of text inside a container. Let's consider general case when the container has padding and border.
The problem is that getBoundingClientRect returns the size of text PLUS left border and padding, in case the text overflows. Otherwise it returns just the size of border box of the container.
You can get the width if you create a placeholder div with all of the same text formatting options and find it's width.
For instance, I will create a div with the class .hidden that has the same attributes as the original div.
div.container
{
font-size: 16px;
}
div.hidden
{
font-size: 16px;
display: none;
}
Then, using jQuery, copy the contents of .container to .hidden and find the width of .hidden:
$(function(){
$("div.container").each(function(){
$("body").append("<div class='hidden'>"+$(this).html()+"</div>");
var width = $("div.hidden").width();
$("div.width").html("Actual width: "+width+"px");
$("div.hidden").remove();
});
});
JSFiddle
Interesting! You could use javascript to clone the text inside of an empty element offscreen that has 0 padding/margin/border. Then you could get the width of that element.
var txt = document.getElementById('fixed').innerHTML,
clone = document.getElementById('clone');
clone.innerHTML = txt;
var width = clone.offsetWidth;
document.getElementById('output').innerHTML = width;
#fixed {
width: 8em;
height: 8em;
border: .5em solid red;
}
#clone {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
position: fixed;
left: -9999px;
}
<div id="fixed">asdfkjahsdflkahjsdflkjhasdljfhalsdkjfhalsdkjfhalsdkjfhalksdhjflasd</div>
<div id="clone"></div>
Width of text: <span id="output"></span>
People who had answered here came with a brilliant idea of wrapping the text into a <div> having zero margin, border and padding;
I just developed the idea further. I place the div inside the container, making the text have exactly the same style as it had without wrapper.
JsFiddle
This solution will work almost everywhere. It can be broken by not very encouraged way of writing CSS, like
.container div b {
padding: 5px; /* firing only when test is run */
}
If you do not code CSS in you project like that, you are the lucky one to use my snippet )
I need to find out if the contents of a span is overflowing its parent div. It works fine in Chrome and FF, but not in IE9. I have the following HTML structure:
<div class="wrapper">
<span>Dynamic text content, which may or may not overflow the parent</span>
</div>
With the following CSS:
.wrapper {
display: inline-block;
width: 80px;
height: 20px;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
white-space: nowrap;
}
In "real" browsers (i.e. not IE), it is easy to check if the span is wider than the div:
var innerSpan = $('.wrapper span');
var wrapperDiv = innerSpan.parent();
if (innerSpan.width() > wrapperDiv.width()) {
// Overflow has happened
}
But in IE9, the call to innerSpan.width() only returns the visible size, which is of course always smaller that the wrapper's size. How can I detect if the text has overflown in IE9?
NOTE: It only needs to work for IE9, not IE8, IE7 or any other version.
EDIT
I found a solution, which detects overflow but requires the span to have display: block;. See my answer below.
The height of your span is 18px as the height of text.When the text overflows the .wrapper div automatically the heigth of span increases.
var height=$('.wrapper span').css("height").replace('px','');
console.log(height);
if(parseFloat(height) > 18){
console.log("overflow occured");
}
DEMO
The element must be present in the DOM in order for the width to be calculated. If you need to calculate this before the user can see the element, try hiding it before putting it into the DOM.
Code Modified:
var innerSpan = $('.wrapper span');
var wrapperDiv = innerSpan.parent();
innerSpan.hide();
alert(innerSpan.width());
alert(wrapperDiv.width());
if (innerSpan.width() > wrapperDiv.width()) {
// Overflow has happened
}
innerSpan.show();
Demo : http://jsfiddle.net/dWzeQ/2/
Hope this will help you!
It worked when I forced the span itself to be block-level, and set the overflow and text-overflow attributes on it. Then I could use scrollWidth and offsetWidth. Here's the code:
HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<span class="inner">Dynamic text content, which may or may not overflow the parent</span>
</div>
CSS:
.wrapper {
display: inline-block;
width: 80px;
height: 20px;
}
.inner {
display: block;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
white-space: nowrap;
overflow: hidden;
}
And finally, the Javascript:
var innerSpan = $('.inner');
if (innerSpan[0].scrollWidth > innerSpan[0].offsetWidth) {
console.log("Overflow!");
}
I have a webpage that is horizontally centered but is rather short - it only takes up half the vertical page. I want it to be centered. How can I center the tag vertically? I cannot have a static height, so that is not an option. if CSS is not powerful enough, can I use Javascript to accomplish this? Thanks!
Two primary ways, neither of which is especially perfect, but widely used:
1) if your content really is a fixed, known height, then you CSS position it with
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
margin-top: here, set a pixel value that's equal to: -1 * (content height / 2)
2) If you don't care if it works the same way in IE7 and below, set CSS as follows:
html { display: table; }
body { display: table-cell; vertical-align: middle; }
If you don't mind adding non-semantic markup, you can do this:
html:
<div class="pusher"></div>
<div class="center"></div>
CSS:
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.pusher {
height: 100%;
margin-bottom: -50%;
}
.center {
background: green;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/Jsqqk/
If you do care about semantic markup, and have to support older browsers, then you'll have to resort to JavaScript for this. Here's one solution using jQuery:
var $window = $(window),
$container = $('#container');
$window.resize(function(){
$container.css('margin-top',
Math.max(($window.height() / 2) - ($container.height() / 2), 0)
);
}).resize();
And here's the fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/dw3rc/
I've often done this with setting height:50% and padding-top:25% but that's not always suitable.
This page identifies a different technique that might work:
http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html