Yallo,
I have the below snippet.
I would like an explanation and perhaps a better solution provided as to why this doesn't work I have suspicions. First I bound the $scope.message to the service var equivalent messageToggle(). then I triggered the timer function timer. but the $scope.message doesn't update with it. The reason I am trying to have the method in a service is because I use the timer a decent amount through my code.
Angular
var app = angular.module('myApp', [])
app.controller('Ctrl', function($scope, Service){
$scope.status = "words"
$scope.message = Service.getMessage()
Service.timer()
})
app.service('Service', function($timeout){
var messageToggle = false
return {
getMessage: function(){
return messageToggle
},
timer: function(){
messageToggle = true;
$timeout(function (messageToggle = false) {}, 2000)
}
}
})
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.1/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css" />
<script src="script.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="Ctrl">
<span ng-show="message"> {{status}} </span>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
It doesn't work because $scope.message = Service.getMessage() does not make $scope.message reference the Service.getMessage() value, but merely ends up copying it. Thus, although the Service.getMessage() value changes, the copy in $scope.message does not, and the angular machinery can not pick up the change.
You need to propagate the change. One alternative:
app.controller('Ctrl', function($scope, Service){
$scope.status = "words"
$scope.message = Service.getMessage()
Service.timer()
$scope.$watch(function() {return Service.getMessage()}, function(message){
$scope.message = message;
});
})
Here we are adding a “manual” watch which will update your scope variable message upon change of the watched value Service.getMessage().
Live example
First thing we need to change here is to use angular.factory instead of angular.service as we are returning an object, service is a constructor function and factory is not so here is difference between the syntax of both:
app.service('myService', function() {
// service is just a constructor function
this.sayHello = function(name) {
return "Hi " + name + "!";
};
});
app.factory('myFactory', function() {
// factory returns an object
// you can run some code before
return {
sayHello : function(name) {
return "Hi " + name + "!";
}
}
});
Now, second change is to notify the change in messageTogglefrom service to controller, to do so one option is to handle the promise returned from $timeout.
So here is the syntax:
var getPromise = function () {
return $timeout(function() {
// logic here
}, 2000);
}
and in the caller function, we need to handle it that is:
getPromise().then(
function(success){
},function(error){
});
And lastly here is the working plunker for your code:
https://plnkr.co/edit/4PDuY3KgwCe7F5Ys12A6?p=preview
Where status is visible for 2000msecs and then gets invisible.
Related
When I use this script:
<script>
function TestClick() {
alert("Test clic");
}
</script>
With this HTML code:
<div>
<input name="BtnAddNew" type="button" value="Load all OPCVM" onclick="TestClick()" />
</div>
It works.
But once I try to put everything inside a controller :
<head>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<title>PetitsTests</title>
<script src="~/Scripts/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script src="~/Scripts/jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js"></script>
<script src="~/Scripts/angular.js"></script>
<script>
var myApp= angular.module("myApp", []);
myApp.controller('OPCVMViewModel', function ($scope, $http) {
function TestClick() {
alert("test clic");
}
});
</script>
</head>
<body ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="OPCVMViewModel">
<input name="BtnAddNew" type="button" value="Load all OPCVM" onclick="TestClick()" />
</div>
</body>
Then I get a "TestClick is not defined" error...
In your controller, try
$scope.TestClick = function(){ alert("test click"); };
And then in the button HTML:
type="button" ng-click="TestClick()"
In short, functions needs to be defined in scope. and use ng-click to call the function.
Example from the official docs:
var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]);
myApp.controller('DoubleController', ['$scope', function($scope) {
$scope.double = function(value) { return value * 2; };
}]);
In short, you must attach whatever functions or properties you declare inside your controller to $scope in order to make them avaialbe to your template/view:
var app = angular.module("myApp", []);
app.controller('OPCVMViewModel', function ($scope, $http) {
function TestClick() {
alert('Test click');
}
$scope.TestClick = TestClick;
// or:
$scope.TestClick = function() {
alert('Test click');
};
});
Also, as JohnMoe has pointed out in the comments, there are other issues in your code.
First of, you should not use onclick, but ng-click. You can find the full list of ng directives here.
Moreover, the controller as syntax is the recommended way to go as from Angular 1.2, even though it will work without it.
Instead of writing something like:
app.controller('FooController', function ($scope) {
$scope.property = 'Foo';
});
You replace $scope for this, and now you don't need to inject $scope and have a nicer class-like looking controller:
app.controller('FooController', function () {
this.property = 'Foo';
});
Your templete will look like this:
<div ng-controller="FooController as vm">
{{ vm.property }}
</div>
If later on you decide to create a directive, it will look something like this:
app.controller('FooController', function () {
this.property = 'Foo';
});
app.directive('fooDirective', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
controller: 'FooController',
controllerAs: 'vm',
template: '{{ vm.property }}'
};
});
Also, you could use proper ES6 classes with a transpiler. Take a look at this if you are interested
I want to send ajax requests at regular intervals from the angular controller method. for that i have written code like below.
var mainApp = angular.module('myapp',[]);
mainApp.controller('controller', function($scope,$http,$window,$timeout) {
$('#radioBtn a').on('click', function(){
$http({
method:,
url:,
params:{parameters}
}).then(function(success){
},function(error){
});
$timeout(function(){
//how to call the anonymous function passed to $('#radioBtn a').on() here.
},30000);
});
I am not getting how to call the anonymous method from timeout function. Using this() is failing.
First off: Don't bind to element clicks like that, use the ng-click directive - in fact, just don't even load jQuery in your application, in 99% cases you're better off without it.
Second: Use angular's $interval service. Check the code sample below.
angular.module('app', [])
.controller('ctrl', function($scope, $interval) {
$scope.numbers = [];
$scope.startInterval = function() {
$scope.interval = $interval(function() {
$scope.numbers.push($scope.numbers.length);
}, 1000)
}
})
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script data-require="angular.js#1.6.0" data-semver="1.6.0" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.0/angular.js"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css" />
<script src="script.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-app="app" ng-controller="ctrl">
<button ng-if="!interval" ng-click="startInterval()">Start polling</button>
<div ng-repeat="number in numbers">
{{number}}
</div>
</body>
</html>
try this way.
var mainApp = angular.module('myapp',[]);
mainApp.controller('controller', function($scope,$http,$window,$interval) {
$('#radioBtn a').on('click', function(){
$interval(function(){
$http({
method:,
url:,
params:{parameters}
}).then(function(success){
},function(error){
});
},30000);
});
I have a datatables.js table set up in an angular 1.2 project. I want a value from an $http.get(...) call to be what is displayed in one of the cells of each row of the table.
I know that $http returns a promise, but I can't figure out how to change the code so that the value of the resolved promise is what is returned by the render function so that the data & not the promise is what is displayed in the table.
UPDATED: Do I need to pre-fetch the data before the table is created? <-- This is the answer! See the selected answer for implementation. You can't make the call for every row within the table using something like Angulars $http because there is no opportunity to return the resolved promises data within the render function.
I'm not looking for a hack unless it is necessary. I would like to solve this with a known pattern.
Here is a fiddle of what I'm trying to do: jsfiddle example
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-app="salutationApp">
<div ng-controller="salutationReportController">
<table id="salutationTable" />
<button type="button" ng-click="init()">
Create Table
</button>
</div>
</div>
<script src="https://cdn.datatables.net/t/dt/jq-2.2.0,dt-1.10.11/datatables.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.29/angular.js"></script>
<script src="app.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
var salutationApp = angular.module("salutationApp", []);
salutationApp.controller("salutationReportController", ["$http", "$scope", function ($http, $scope) {
var getSalutationLink = function (data) {
var url = 'http://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts/1';
return $http({
method: 'GET',
url: url,
params: data
});
};
var init = function () {
var salutationDataSource = [
{
salutationDataField: "hello!"
},
{
salutationDataField: "good morning!"
},
{
salutationDataField: "greeetings!"
}
];
$("#salutationTable").DataTable({
"bDestroy": true,
data: salutationDataSource,
columns: [{
title: "Salutation",
data: "salutationDataField",
render: function (cellData, type, fullRowData, meta) {
//I want this to return a some data from the server
var retVal = getSalutationLink({
salutation: cellData,
});
return retVal; // I know this is a promise... but I need to return the value of the resolved promise. I want the data from the web server to be the return value. This is where I'm stuck.
}
}]
});
};
$scope.init = function () {
init();
};
}]);
Thanks!
I don't think your ng-controller would even work? You don't set it to a global variable name, it has to be declared within angular.
html
<div ng-controller="SalutationReportController">
<div id="salutationTable"></div>
</div>
js
//this shouldn't work
var SalutationReportController = function() { /* blah */ }
//this would work
angular
.module('app')
.controller('SalutationReportController', ['$http', '$scope', function() {
$http.get('/api/foobar').then(function(res) {
//now the data you got from the promise is publicly available to your child directive
$scope.tabledata = res.data;
});
}])
Somewhere in the code for your directive you'll need to add the correct scope properties and have the directive inherit the property according to its api.
Have you looked in to Angular-datatables?
http://l-lin.github.io/angular-datatables/#/withPromise
angular.module('showcase.withPromise', ['datatables', 'ngResource']).controller('WithPromiseCtrl', WithPromiseCtrl);
function WithPromiseCtrl(DTOptionsBuilder, DTColumnBuilder, $resource) {
var vm = this;
vm.dtOptions = DTOptionsBuilder.fromFnPromise(function() {
return $resource('data.json').query().$promise;
}).withPaginationType('full_numbers');
vm.dtColumns = [
DTColumnBuilder.newColumn('id').withTitle('ID'),
DTColumnBuilder.newColumn('firstName').withTitle('First name'),
DTColumnBuilder.newColumn('lastName').withTitle('Last name').notVisible()
];
}
I've been searching for hours how to update a service value from a nested controller.
My child controller needs to update a value in a service. And that value needs to be shown in the parent controller.
I've made a jsfiddle to make it more clear and easy to help
http://jsfiddle.net/jtsmduxw/3/
<body ng-app="MyApp">
<div ng-controller="parentCtrl">
<p>{{username}}</p>
<div ng-controller="childCtrl">
<p>{{username}}</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
-
var app = angular.module("MyApp", []);
app.service('authenticationSrv', function () {
var user = 'anonymous';
return {
getUser: function () {
return user;
},
setUser: function (value) {
user = value;
}
};
});
app.controller("parentCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
$scope.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
app.controller("childCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
authenticationSrv.setUser('my name'); // I need this function to also update the scope of the parent
$scope.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
(I've read and tried Update parent scope variable, but I could not make it work with the service.)
Thanks!
Make use of an object literal instead of the variable username.
Parent
app.controller("parentCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
$scope.parentObject = {};
$scope.parentObject.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
Child
app.controller("childCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
authenticationSrv.setUser('my name');
$scope.parentObject.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
Working Example
var app = angular.module("MyApp", []);
app.service('authenticationSrv', function () {
var user = 'anonymous';
return {
getUser: function () {
return user;
},
setUser: function (value) {
user = value;
}
};
});
app.controller("parentCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
$scope.parentObject = {};
$scope.parentObject.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
app.controller("childCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
authenticationSrv.setUser('my name');
$scope.parentObject.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<body ng-app="MyApp">
<div ng-controller="parentCtrl">
<p>{{parentObject.username}}</p>
<div ng-controller="childCtrl">
<p>{{parentObject.username}}</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Make user in the Service an object instead of a primitive (string). Then use {{user.name}} in your view.
Notice that I did some minor changes to authenticationSrv.setUser()
and renamed it to authenticationSrv.setUserName().
See my working fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/rbwk3rqb/
var app = angular.module("MyApp", []);
angular.module("MyApp")
.service('authenticationSrv', function () {
var user = {name: 'anonymous'};
return {
getUser: function () {
return user;
},
setUserName: function (value) {
user.name = value;
}
};
});
angular.module("MyApp")
.controller("parentCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
$scope.user = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
angular.module("MyApp")
.controller("childCtrl", function ($scope, authenticationSrv) {
authenticationSrv.setUserName('my name');
$scope.user = authenticationSrv.getUser();
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<body ng-app="MyApp">
<div ng-controller="parentCtrl">
<p>{{user.name}}</p>
<div ng-controller="childCtrl">
<p>{{user.name}}</p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
As user is a primitive value in the service, when you put the value from the service to your controller's scope with this line:
$scope.username = authenticationSrv.getUser();
the value of user is copied into $scope.username. So just because later on you overwrite the value of user in the service, nothing is changing in your "parent" $scope.
There are several ways to get around this, the easiest is probably to create a user object in your service - if you store the reference to this object in your scopes, it will reflect the changes made to it from other controllers. (Objects in javascript are passed by reference value, so all controllers will be affecting the same object, not copies of the values.) For the actual implementation, I'd guide you back to the same link you posted - when you tried implementing that, what was the problem with it? Show us the code you tried.
Alternatively, you can also implement the observer pattern using this service (this is considerably more work), or use events on the scope hierarchy to notify the controllers of the change of user (this is a questionable practice).
The idea is to create and object to update and not just a primitive:
$scope.user = {};
$scope.user.name = authenticateSrv.getUser();
and in the child scope you just set it:
$scope.user.name = authenticateSrv.setUser('my name');
here is a Fiddle
I've built an app with firebase that can login a user and attain their id, but I can't figure out how to incorporate this with a user making a submission of a string.
See Code pen here: http://codepen.io/chriscruz/pen/OPPeLg
HTML Below:
<html ng-app="fluttrApp">
<head>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.1.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/ui/1.11.1/jquery-ui.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.3.2/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.firebase.com/js/client/2.0.2/firebase.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.firebase.com/libs/angularfire/0.9.0/angularfire.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body ng-controller="fluttrCtrl">
<button ng-click="auth.$authWithOAuthPopup('google')">Login with Google</button>
<li>Welcome, {{user.google.displayName }}</li>
<button ng-click="auth.$unauth()">Logout with Google</button>
<input ng-submit= "UpdateFirebaseWithString()" ng-model="string" ></input>
Javascript Below:
<script>
var app = angular.module("fluttrApp", ["firebase"]);
app.factory("Auth", ["$firebaseAuth", function($firebaseAuth) {
var ref = new Firebase("https://crowdfluttr.firebaseio.com/");
return $firebaseAuth(ref);
}]);
app.controller("fluttrCtrl", ["$scope", "Auth", function($scope, Auth) {
$scope.auth = Auth;
$scope.user = $scope.auth.$getAuth();
$scope.UpdateFirebaseWithString = function () {
url = "https://crowdfluttr.firebaseio.com/ideas"
var ref = new Firebase(url);
var sync = $firebaseAuth(ref);
$scope.ideas = sync.$asArray();
$scope.ideas.$add({
idea: $scope.string,
userId:$scope.user.google.id,
});
};
}])
</script>
</body>
</html>
Also assuming, the above dependencies, the below works to submit an idea, but the question still remains in how to associate this with a user. See codepen here on this: http://codepen.io/chriscruz/pen/raaENR
<body ng-controller="fluttrCtrl">
<form ng-submit="addIdea()">
<input ng-model="title">
</form>
<script>
var app = angular.module("fluttrApp", ["firebase"]);
app.controller("fluttrCtrl", function($scope, $firebase) {
var ref = new Firebase("https://crowdfluttr.firebaseio.com/ideas");
var sync = $firebase(ref);
$scope.ideas = sync.$asArray();
$scope.addIdea = function() {
$scope.ideas.$add(
{
"title": $scope.title,
}
);
$scope.title = '';
};
});
</script>
</body>
There a couple of things tripping you up.
Differences between $firebaseand $firebaseAuth
AngularFire 0.9 is made up of two primary bindings: $firebaseAuth and $firebase. The $firebaseAuth binding is for all things authentication. The $firebase binding is for synchronizing your data from Firebase as either an object or an array.
Inside of UpdateFirebaseWithString you are calling $asArray() on $firebaseAuth. This method belongs on a $firebase binding.
When to call $asArray()
When you call $asArray inside of the UpdateFirebaseWithString function you will create the binding and sync the array each time the function is called. Rather than do that you should create it outside of the function so it's only created one item.
Even better than that, you can abstract creation of the binding and the $asArray function into a factory.
Plunker Demo
app.factory("Ideas", ["$firebase", "Ref", function($firebase, Ref) {
var childRef = Ref.child('ideas');
return $firebase(childRef).$asArray();
}]);
Get the user before the controller invokes
You have the right idea by getting the user from $getAuth. This is a synchronous method, the app will block until the user is returned. Right now you'll need to get the user in each controller. You can make your life easier, by retrieving the user in the app's run function. Inside of the run function we can inject $rootScope and the custom Auth factory and attach the user to $rootScope. This way the user will available to all controllers (unless you override $scope.user inside of your controller).
app.run(["$rootScope", "Auth", function($rootScope, Auth) {
$rootScope.user = Auth.$getAuth();
}]);
This is a decent approach, but as mentioned before $scope.users can be overridden. An even better way would be to resolve to user from the route. There's a great section in AngularFire guide about this.
Associating a user with their data
Now that we have the user before the controller invokes, we can easily associate their id with their input.
app.controller("fluttrCtrl", ["$scope", "Ideas", function($scope, Ideas) {
$scope.ideas = Ideas;
$scope.idea = "";
$scope.UpdateFirebaseWithString = function () {
$scope.ideas.$add({
idea: $scope.idea,
userId: $scope.user.google.id,
}).then(function(ref) {
clearIdea();
});
};
function clearIdea() {
$scope.idea = "";
}
}]);