I'm using react-komposer to wrap React components with a data fetching wrapper.
It is very basic and I'd want to wrap multiple components in Meteor. But I can't figure out what the export pattern is?
Here is what I have (and gives me an "Unexpected Token" error - probably obvious if you understand this well!):
// myContainer.jsx
import Component1 from './Component1.jsx';
import Component2 from './Component2.jsx';
function composer(props, onData) {
if (Meteor.subscribe('SingleTodoLists').ready()) {
const todoList = todoLists.find({}).fetch();
onData(null, { todoList });
}
}
export composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(Component1);
export composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(Component2);
And I'd like to import them like this:
import { Component1, Component2 } from './myContainer.jsx';
This wrapper syntax is not really clear for me, so I'm unsure about what to try. Playing with export default and other variations yielded no result so far.
If you don't use default exports, you need to name the things you export:
export const TrackedComponent1 = composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(Component1);
export const TrackedComponent2 = composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(Component2);
If you use default export instead you can omit the name, e.g.
export default composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(Component1);
But you can only define one default export per module
See the documentation for the ES6 export syntax: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/web/javascript/reference/statements/export
Update:
If you want to keep the original export names:
import _Component1 from './Component1.jsx';
import _Component2 from './Component2.jsx';
//... you code here
export composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(_Component1);
export composeWithTracker(composer, Loading)(_Component2);
Because Component1.jsx uses a default exports, when you import it you can rename it as you want (e.g. _Component1, UntrackedComponent1, ...). Without a default export, you could have used import { Component1 } as _Component1 instead.
Related
In this line:
import React, { Component } from "react";
why the braces are only around Component and not also on 'React'?
Here's a great answer that explains default and named imports in ES6
Let's say we have a class named Foo that I want to import. If I want to get the default export, I would do:
import Foo from './foo.js';
If I wanted a specific function inside the foo file, I would use the curly braces.
import { fooFunction } from './foo.js';
Note, this isn't a React feature, but ES6. Likely you are using babel to transpile your code from ES6 to ES5.
To create something similar in react. Lets take this following example.
someobject.js
const someobject = {
somefunc1: ()=>console.log("hello 1"),
somefunc2: ()=>console.log("hello 2")
}
export default someobject;
app.js
import someobject, { somefunc1, somefunc2 } from "./someobject";
someobject.somefunc1(); //hello 1
someobject.somefunc2(); //hello 2
somefunc1(); //hello 1
somefunc2(); //hello 2
export defaul
In the React module the default export is the React object and it also has a named export Component1, something like this:
// assuming React and Component are predefined
export default React
export Component
Coincidentally Component is also available on the React object, so it is not necessary to import separately, although some people prefer your approach. For example this is possible:
// MyComponent.js
import React from 'react'
class MyComponent extends React.Component {}
More information about ES6 module syntax can be found here.
1 Note that actually the React library does not have a named export Component as in the example above, however Component is a property on the default export and so due to the way that ES6 packages are transpiled by Babel, this becomes a named export, the behaviour then being as in the example above.
Import react will import the default react package, Component with braces then specifies a particular element of the React package. React by default will not need braces as it is the default import package.
import React, { Component } from "react";
Hope this helps
That is because the default export module in the react library is React, and there can be only one default export, even though you can export many other components, but only one can be default. Other components of the React library can then be destructured.
React is a module containing different methods, When using just React word, you import the whole module, so you can use React.Component (in this case dot notation reference to a method inside the module).
So if you need to import method? you will use braces, why?
because you import method between many methods in one module, So it's able to increase & decrease, so you can import {a, b, c, r, w, q} that's methods inside one class or one module, So you can see that if you using
import {Component} from 'react';
Now you can use Component word direct without dot reference like react.component.
So React module is exported by default, Here I need all the React module and I will use it with all methods, {Component} here exported by name, I need specific method from React library not all react library
and please check it too When should I use curly braces for ES6 import?
in the import import React, { Component } from "react"; we put the Component in braces because it is not the default export. however React is,... look at the following example
import React from "react";
export const Fun1 = () => {
return (
<React.Fragment>
<h1>this is fun 1</h1>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
export const Fun2 = () => {
return (
<React.Fragment>
<h1>this is fun 2</h1>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
const Fun3 = () => {
return (
<React.Fragment>
<h1>this is fun 3</h1>
</React.Fragment>
);
};
export default Fun3;
if we save the above file under example.js we can import the components in exmpample.js file as
import Fun3, {Fun1, Fun2} from "example";
therefore Fun3 is the default export and the other components Fun1 and Fun2 are not
I'm using MaterialUI and I have to export my components like this:
import withStyles, { WithStyles } from "#material-ui/core/styles/withStyles";
...
export default withStyles(styles)(Users);
Now I started to use i18next to use internationalization in my project but it want me to export my component like this:
export default translate("common")(Users);
The question is how can I satisfy both? How can I export with withStyles and translate?
Any help is appreciated
Both of those pieces of code produce a new component, so you can feed the result of one into the other. Done in one line, it would look like this:
export default withStyles(styles)(translate("common")(Users));
Or if it makes it easier to follow, here it is split on two lines.
const TranslatedUsers = translate("common")(Users);
export default withStyles(styles)(TranslatedUsers);
The purpose of higher-order components is to provide a way for components to be efficiently composed:
export default translate("common")(
withStyles(styles)(Users)
);
It can be flattened with composition helpers, e.g. recompose:
import { compose } from 'recompose'
export default compose(
translate("common"),
withStyles(styles)
)(Users);
What is the reason for:
import something1 from './something1'
import something2 from './something2'
export default {
something1,
something2
}
export {
something1,
something2
}
?
And why isn't possible to do:
export default something
export something
Thank you.
For the case where you want individual module elements and a library namespace. If this were the old days:
import { extend } from "jquery";
import $ from "jquery";
One of these is importing a named export, and one of these is importing the default. Either is valid. But in general, the common practice is individual exports.
Because an export statement is either expecting you to declare the thing inline
export const something = ...
Which means that it can't be reassigned as default as well...
Or it's expecting you to export a batch of named values.
export default something;
export { something };
I have referred all the questions in stackoverflow.
But none of the suggested why and when to use default export.
I just saw that default can be metioned "When there is only one export in a file"
Any other reason for using default export in es6 modules?
Some differences that might make you choose one over the other:
Named Exports
Can export multiple values
MUST use the exported name when importing
Default Exports
Export a single value
Can use any name when importing
This article does a nice job of explaining when it would be a good idea to use one over the other.
It's somewhat a matter of opinion, but there are some objective aspects to it:
You can have only one default export in a module, whereas you can have as many named exports as you like.
If you provide a default export, the programmer using it has to come up with a name for it. This can lead to inconsistency in a codebase, where Mary does
import example from "./example";
...but Joe does
import ex from "./example";
In contrast, with a named export, the programmer doesn't have to think about what to call it unless there's a conflict with another identifier in their module.¹ It's just
import { example } from "./example";
With a named export, the person importing it has to specify the name of what they're importing. They get a nice early error if they try to import something that doesn't exist.
If you consistently only use named exports, programmers importing from modules in the project don't have to think about whether what they want is the default or a named export.
¹ If there is a conflict (for instance, you want example from two different modules), you can use as to rename:
import { example as widgetExample } from "./widget/example";
import { example as gadgetExample } from "./gadget/example";
You should almost always favour named exports, default exports have many downsides
Problems with default exports:
Difficult to refactor or ensure consistency since they can be named anything in the codebase other than what its actually called
Difficult to analyze by automated tools or provide code intellisense and autocompletion
They break tree shaking as instead of importing the single function you want to use you're forcing webpack to import the entire file with whatever other dead code it has leading to bigger bundle sizes
You can't export more than a single export per file
You lose faster/direct access to imports
checkout these articles for a more detailed explanation:
https://blog.neufund.org/why-we-have-banned-default-exports-and-you-should-do-the-same-d51fdc2cf2ad
https://humanwhocodes.com/blog/2019/01/stop-using-default-exports-javascript-module/
https://rajeshnaroth.medium.com/avoid-es6-default-exports-a24142978a7a
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
You can also alias named imports, assign a new name to a named export as you import it, allowing you to resolve naming collisions, or give the export a more informative name.
import MyComponent as MainComponent from "./MyComponent";
You can also Import all the named exports onto an object:
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
From MDN:
Named exports are useful to export several values. During the import, one will be able to use the same name to refer to the corresponding value.
Concerning the default export, there is only a single default export per module. A default export can be a function, a class, an object or anything else. This value is to be considered as the “main” exported value since it will be the simplest to import.
There aren't any definitive rules, but there are some conventions that people use to make it easier to structure or share code.
When there is only one export in the entire file, there is no reason to make it named.
Also, when your module has one main purpose, it could make sense to make that your default export. In those cases you can extra named exports
In react for example, React is the default export, since that is often the only part that you need. You don't always Component, so that's a named export that you can import when needed.
import React, {Component} from 'react';
In the other cases where one module has multiple equal (or mostly equal) exports, it's better to use named exports
import { blue, red, green } from 'colors';
1st Method:-
export foo; //so that this can be used in other file
import {foo} from 'abc'; //importing data/fun from module
2nd Method:-
export default foo; //used in one file
import foo from 'blah'; //importing data/fun from module
3rd Method:-
export = foo;
import * as foo from 'blah';
The above methods roughly compile to the following syntax below:-
//all export methods
exports.foo = foo; //1st method
exports['default'] = foo; //2nd method
module.exports = foo; //3rd method
//all import methods
var foo = require('abc').foo; //1st method
var foo = require('abc')['default']; //2nd method
var foo = require('abc'); //3rd method
For more information, visit to Default keyword explaination
Note:- There can be only one export default in one file.
So whenever we are exporting only 1 function, then it's better to use default keyword while exporting
EASIEST DEFINITION TO CLEAR CONFUSIONS
Let us understand the export methods, first, so that we can analyze ourselves when to use what, or why do we do what we do.
Named exports: One or more exports per module. When there are more than one exports in a module, each named export must be restructured while importing. Since there could be either export in the same module and the compiler will not know which one is required unless we mention it.
//Named export , exporting:
export const xyz = () =>{
}
// while importing this
import {xyx} from 'path'
or
const {xyz} = require(path)
The braces are just restructuring the export object.
On the other hand , default exports are only one export per module , so they are pretty plain.
//exporting default
const xyz =() >{
};
export default xyz
//Importing
import xyz from 'path'
or
const xyz = require(path)
I hope this was pretty simple to understand, and by now you can understand why you import React modules within braces...
Named Export: (export)
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
Import all the named exports onto an object:
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
Default Export: (export default)
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
Note: The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
Here's a great answer that explains default and named imports in ES6
I want to export App Object direct after importing, Can I merge these two lines?
import App from './app.js';
export default App;
The documentation states:
Exporting defaults: The following syntax does not export a default export from the imported module:
export * from …;
If you need to export the default, write the following instead:
import mod from "mod";
export default mod;