Related
I know we can use calc when lengths are defined:
flex-basis: calc(33.33% - 60px);
left: calc(50% - 25px);
height: calc(100em/5);
But what if a length is variable?
height: calc(100% - <<header with variable height>>);
OR
width: calc(100% - 50px - <<box with variable width>>);
Is there a standard way to do this in CSS?
I know the overall task is possible with flexbox and tables, but I'm wondering if CSS offers a simpler method. Flexbox, tables and simple Javascript are acceptable alternatives.
height demo
width demo
You can use CSS tables:
.wrapper {
display: table;
width: 100%;
margin: 15px 0;
}
.horizontal.wrapper > div {
display: table-cell;
white-space: nowrap; /* Prevent line wrapping */
border: 1px solid;
}
.left { width: 100px } /* Minimum width of 100px */
.center { width: 0; } /* Width given by contents */
.vertical.wrapper { height: 200px; }
.vertical.wrapper > div {
display: table-row;
}
.vertical.wrapper > div > span {
display: table-cell;
border: 1px solid;
}
.top { height: 100px; } /* Minimum heigth of 100px */
.middle { height: 0; } /* Height given by content */
.bottom { height: 100%; } /* As tall as possible */
<div class="horizontal wrapper">
<div class="left">100px wide</div>
<div class="center">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
<div class="vertical wrapper">
<div class="top"><span>100px tall</span></div>
<div class="middle"><span>Auto height, given by contents</span></div>
<div class="bottom"><span>Remaining space</span></div>
</div>
The horizontal case can also be achieved with floats:
#wrapper, .right { overflow: hidden; } /* Establish BFC */
#wrapper > div { border: 1px solid; }
.left, .middle { float: left; }
.left { width: 100px }
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="left">100px</div>
<div class="middle">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
Flexbox can do that.
Support is IE10 and up.
JSfiddle Demo
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
#top {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
#bottom {
background-color: lightblue;
flex: 1;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="top">green box variable height</div>
<div id="bottom">blue box no longer overflows browser window</div>
</div>
I'm looking for something simple and portable. In the same way a CSS
property can be easily applied across documents, I'm looking for
something similar in terms of ease-of-application for this function.
... isolated fix is preferred.
Horizontal:
This can be achieved using CSS only. As you do not prefer a flex layout solution, the next best bet would be a table layout.
A simple CSS snippet which you could drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child { width: 100%; }
You can then add your site-specific styling to this base CSS as per site requirements. Like, nowrap etc.
Two apparent advantages of this solution are:
You do not need to change your markup and also do not need to decorate all children with classes. Just apply the class flexh to your parent div and that would be it.
Minimal Markup Required:
<div class="flexh">
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
</div>
You are not limited to just three columns. You could have as many columns as need be. The first one will have fixed width, the last one will be flexible, and all the columns in-between would get content-based widths.
Demo Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/qqq4mq23/
Demo Snippet:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
/* Override your custom styling below */
width: 80%; border: 2px solid black;
border-right: 2px dashed black;
font-size: 1em;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 15px 5px;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child {
width: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable Content Width</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable TextWidth</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' />
<p>Variable ContentWidth</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
Vertical:
This is a bit tricky to achieve without flex layout. A table layout would not work here mainly because, the table-row would not keep a fixed height as required by your use-case. The height on a table-row or table-cell is only an indicative of the minimum height required. If the space is constrained, or the content exceeds the available space, then the cell or row will increase its height depending on the content.
As per the specs here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#height-layout
The height of a 'table-row' element's box is calculated once the user
agent has all the cells in the row available: it is the maximum of the
row's computed 'height', the computed 'height' of each cell in the
row, and the minimum height (MIN) required by the cells...
...the height of a cell box is the minimum height required by the
content
This effect can be seen here: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/6eropud3/
(Resize the window pane and you will see that the first row will increase in height as the content cannot be fit into the specified height, hence defeating the purpose)
Therefore, you can restrict the height indirectly either using inner markup like a div element, or let go of the table-layout and calculate the height for the flexible one. In your use-case, you prefer not to change the markup, hence I am not proposing an inner markup.
The best-bet here would be to use the time-tested model of plain block-level divs with the height of the flexible one to be calculated. As you have already discovered that it is not possible with CSS, you will need a small JavaScript snippet to do that for you.
A simple JavaScript snippet (no jQuery) which you could wrap in a window.load and drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
/* iterate the instances on your page */
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children), // get all children
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1), // get the last child
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight; // aggregate the height
});
/* assign the calculated height on the last child */
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
The CSS snippet is more or less like the horizontal one, sans table layout, which also you could just drop into your project and just add the additional site-specific styling. Minimal markup required remains the same.
Demo Fiddle 2: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/Ltcuxdwf/
Demo Snippet:
document.addEventListener("load", flexit);
function flexit(e) {
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children),
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1),
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight;
});
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
}
div.flexv {
display: inline-table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
height: 320px; width: 20%; border: 1px solid black; font-size: 1em;
margin: 8px;
}
div.flexv > div {
display: block; height: auto; box-sizing: border-box;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 5px 15px;
}
div.flexv > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-height: 36px; height: 36px; max-height: 36px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexv > div:last-child {
height: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Content Height</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/64x72/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Text Height</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/72x48/66c' />
<p>Variable Content Height</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
Note: As pointed out by #LGSon, the display: inline-table used for the demo does not play well with Firefox. This is only for a demo and should be replaced by either block or inline-block as per your use-case.
Updated
As I commented earlier, and besides flex, this is also solvable using display: table and here is a fiddle demo I made showing that.
If a fixed top also were required for the vertical demo, here is an update of my original display:table version: fiddle demo
Sometimes I haven't been able (or didn't want) to use either flex nor tables, and I have, on and off, looked into making use of css calc() and css attr().
Both come short though, as calc() can only use +-*/ and attr() can only return a string value, which can't be computed by calc().
My suggestion, using plain javascript, is based on that these 2 methods, at some point, might be extended so we can make better use of them.
This is how I would like see them work;
width: calc(100% - attr(this.style.left))
but as they don't, and I can't add it to my css either as it wouldn't validate properly (might even break the parsing, who knows) I added a variant as an attribute on the element instead, with some quirks to make it easier to compute.
And in this case (the 2 demos) it looks like this:
//height
<div id="bottom" data-calcattr="top,height,calc(100% - toppx)">...</div>
//width
<div class="box right" data-calcattr="left,width,calc(100% - leftpx)">...</div>
Together with below script, which by no means is fully developed/tested on all property combinations, it does adjust the div's size.
In short, when runned, it take the attribute, split it into an array, take the first item value as from which property to read, the second to which property to set and the third to which the read value gets inserted/replaced and assigned to the property to be set (hmmm, still working on a better way to express this, but hopefully the script is clear enough with whats going on).
Here is a fiddle showing both the height and width demo, integrated, making use of the same script.
function calcattr() {
var els = document.querySelectorAll('[data-calcattr]');
for (i = 0; i < els.length; i++) {
var what = els[i].getAttribute('data-calcattr');
if (what) {
what = what.split(',');
var rect = els[i].getBoundingClientRect();
var parentrect = els[i].parentNode.getBoundingClientRect();
var brd = window.getComputedStyle(els[i].parentNode,null).getPropertyValue('border-' + what[0] + '-width');
what[2] = what[2].replace(what[0],parseInt(rect[what[0]]-parentrect[what[0]]) - parseInt(brd));
els[i].setAttribute("style", what[1] + ":" + what[2]);
}
}
}
IN CSS
Although I've never tried it, I believe that this would work:
.top {
height:13px;
}
.main {
height:calc(100% - var(height));
}
http://www.creativebloq.com/netmag/why-you-need-use-css-variables-91412904
IN SASS
$top_height: 50px
.main {
height: calc(100% - $top_height)
}
Sass Variable in CSS calc() function
In both cases on container css you should put:
#container {
overflow: hidden;
}
But, it will hide the information that overflows the container. I think that is the point, since you put white-space: nowrap; it means that you don't want to change the height, so you have to hide the text that can't fits the container.
I'm trying to achieve the following in HTML/Javascript:
have a coloured circle with a piece of text perfectly centred (both horizontally and vertically) within it;
dynamically from JavaScript, be able to alter the size of the circle, maintaining the text centred within it at all times.
The following achieves the first of these:
Create the circle using a DIV element whose style has appropriate background and border-radius;
Inside the DIV, put a P element whose style has "text-aligbn: center" and "line-height: ".
For example:
p.circlecaption {
text-align: center;
line-height: 128px;
}
...
<div style="background: #a0a0a0; margin: 0px; width: 128px;
height: 128px; border-radius: 64px;" id="theCircleDiv">
<p class="circlecaption" id="theText">TEST!</p>
</div>
This works fine for the initial, static, case. The problem comes when, from JavaScript, I attempt to set the line-height property in order to keep the text vertically centred as I change the size of the div. I expected something like the following to work:
var obj = document.getElementById('theCircleDiv');
var sz = '' + (rad*2) + 'px';
obj.style.width = sz;
obj.style.height = sz;
obj.style.margin = '' + (64 - rad) + 'px';
obj = document.getElementById('theText');
obj.style['line-height'] = sz;
However, while this code re-sizes and re-centres the circle perfectly, it doesn't vertically re-centre the text-- i.e. the attempt to dynamically set line-height appears to be ignored.
Can anybody offer any help on either how to set line-height dynamically, or else a way to achieve my desired goal of keeping the text centred within the circle? From my reading around, I've seen various other suggestions such as calling the property "lineHeight" or playing around with "vertical-align: middle", but none seems to work.
(I am currently testing in Safari on Mac OS which is likely to be most used among the site's target audience, but am also looking for a solution that is reasonably cross-browser compatible.)
You can achieve that with pure css
#theCircleDiv {
display: table-cell;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
}
#theText {
vertical-align: middle;
}
Working Example: http://jsfiddle.net/bZj52/
Here is an example. I'm using jQuery UI to wire up some dynamic setting of the size but the re-size code should work in a pure JavaScript environment.
First, I cleaned up the HTML and put it's style in CSS
HTML:
<div id="theCircleDiv">
<p class="circlecaption" id="theText">TEST!</p>
</div>
CSS:
#theText {
text-align: center;
line-height: 128px;
}
#theCircleDiv {
background: #a0a0a0;
margin: 0px;
width: 128px;
height: 128px;
border-radius: 64px;
}
JavaScript:
function resize(size) {
var circle = document.getElementById('theCircleDiv'),
text = document.getElementById('theText');
circle.style.width = size + 'px';
circle.style.height = size + 'px';
circle.style.borderRadius = (size / 2) + 'px';
text.style.lineHeight = size + 'px';
}
And this is much easier with flex box.
div {
background-color: #ccc;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
/* Important Part */
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
<div>
<span>Center Me Please</span>
</div>
I've got problems to get text in the label to the bottom of the label.
I'm animating a falling text, the label does "seem" to fall as it should, but the text stays on top, it's not following the label downwards. Please check this jsfiddle out, press the button to see the problem. I have tried many different ways without coming up with a working solution.
http://jsfiddle.net/kaze72/jQ6Ua/
.uppgifter
{
vertical-align: text-bottom;
}
Seems not to help!
You can try
.uppgifter
{
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: bottom;
background-color: yellow;
}
jsFiddle
Updated jsFiddle so that .uppgifter's height in animate method matches #spelplan's height.
.uppgifter
{
padding: 580px 0 1px 230px;
}
You could just animate the padding-top:
$("#the_button").click(function () {
$(".uppgifter").animate({
'padding-top':"500px"
}, 4000, "linear", function() {});
});
try this:
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#the_button").click(function () {
$(".uppgifter").animate({
"height":"100px","padding-top":"500px"},
4000, "linear", function() {});
});
});
or just a suggestion, take a look at this :):
$(document).ready(function() {
$("#the_button").click(function () {
$(".uppgifter").animate({
"top":"500px"}, 4000, "linear", function() {});
});
});
combined with
.uppgifter
{
vertical-align: text-bottom;
position:relative;
background-color: yellow;
}
*
{
font-family: cursive;
}
.panel
{
position:relative;
border: 1px solid;
}
#spelplan
{
height: 600px;
}
.uppgifter
{
position:absolute;
vertical-align: text-bottom;
bottom:0;
background-color: yellow;
}
I simply added two transparent divs set with a 90% height that force the text down as the label height changes.
http://jsfiddle.net/jQ6Ua/15/
#div
{
height:90%;
width:200%
}
To vertically align a text in a container, multiple techniques can be used. However, most of them have additional script calculation at runtime (if the height of the text container is changing) which can mess with the business logic.
A hack can be used in your particular situation.
You can add an image container with empty src inside your text container with 100% height and 0 width set by css.
<label id="uppgift" class="uppgifter" style="display:inline-block;"><img scr=""/>Abc</label>
<label id="uppgift2" class="uppgifter" style="display:inline-block;"><img scr=""/>123</label>
//and css
.uppgifter img{
height:100%;
width:0;
}
Example
This way you would not have to write logic for additional added layers.
I have a problem here in Chrome (maybe in other browsers too).
I have a wrapper div which floats to the left. It contains some child div and these divs float to the left too and they have different widths according to their contents. I defined a max-width property for the wrapper div and as you can see in the fiddle code when the wrapper reaches this max-width, the last child in the wrapper moves to the next line but the wrapper keeps the maximum width and there are a lot of empty space on the right.
I'd assume the wrapper's size should be recalculated and should have a smaller width because it floats.
I'd like it, because in my real code the wrapper has "sexy" css but it looks rude with empty spaces.
Sorry for my English, I hope you'll understand my problem. Has anyone an idea how I can resolve this problem without any JS (or just a little bit of JS)?
Thanks!
http://jsfiddle.net/Xd9PV/1/
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="float float-1">apple</div>
<div class="float float-2">banana</div>
<div class="float float-3">orange</div>
<div class="float float-4">some very delicious strawberries</div>
</div>
.wrapper {
border: 1px solid red;
float: left;
max-width: 300px;
}
.float {
border: 1px solid blue;
float: left;
}
It’s not possible using CSS. When you set a max-width, it won’t recalculate it’s width after x floats have dropped to other lines because of the overflow.
You can use javascript/jQuery to calculate this for you instead that inserts a break where needed, f.ex:
var width = 0,
maxWidth = 300, w;
$('.wrapper .float').each(function() {
width += ( w = $(this).outerWidth() );
if ( width > maxWidth ) {
$(this).before('<div style="clear:left"></div>');
width = w;
}
});
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/2mfbY/
Add a clear:both to the last div element like this:
.float {
border: 1px solid blue;
float: left;
margin-right: 5px;
}
.float:last-child {
clear:both;
}
Works for me.
You can try using ellipsis (But I am not sure whether it seems OK to you or not)
.float {
border: 1px solid blue;
float: left; padding:0 2px;
margin-right: 5px; max-width:90px;
text-overflow:ellipsis ;
white-space:nowrap; overflow:hidden
}
DEMO
I have two divs inside of a container. One on the left, one on the right, side by side. How am I able to make each one be of equal height, even though they have different content.
For example, the right div has a lot of content, and is double the height of the left div, how do I make the left div stretch to the same height of the right div?
Is there some JavaScript (jQuery) code to accomplish this?
You could use jQuery, but there are better ways to do this.
This sort of question comes up a lot and there are generally 3 answers...
1. Use CSS
This is the 'best' way to do it, as it is the most semantically pure approach (without resorting to JS, which has its own problems). The best way is to use the display: table-cell and related values. You could also try using the faux background technique (which you can do with CSS3 gradients).
2. Use Tables
This seems to work great, but at the expense of having an unsemantic layout. You'll also cause a stir with purists. I have all but avoided using tables, and you should too.
3. Use jQuery / JavaScript
This benefits in having the most semantic markup, except with JS disabled, you will not get the effect you desire.
Here's a way to do it with pure CSS, however, as you'll notice in the example (which works in IE 7 and Firefox), borders can be difficult - but they aren't impossible, so it all depends what you want to do. This example assumes a rather common CSS structure of body > wrapper > content container > column 1 and column 2.
The key is the bottom margin and its canceling padding.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Equal Height Columns</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
* { padding: 0; margin: 0; }
#wrapper { margin: 10px auto; width: 600px; }
#wrapper #main_container { width: 590px; padding: 10px 0px 10px 10px; background: #CCC; overflow: hidden; border-bottom: 10px solid #CCC; }
#wrapper #main_container div { float: left; width: 263px; background: #999; padding: 10px; margin-right: 10px; border: 1px solid #000; margin-bottom: -1000px; padding-bottom: 1000px; }
#wrapper #main_container #right_column { background: #FFF; }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="main_container">
<div id="left_column">
<p>I have two divs inside of a container. One on the left, one on the right, side by side. How am I able to make each one be of equal height, even though they have different content.</p>
</div><!-- LEFT COLUMN -->
<div id="right_column">
<p>I have two divs inside of a container. One on the left, one on the right, side by side. How am I able to make each one be of equal height, even though they have different content.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For example, the right div has a lot of content, and is double the height of the left div, how do I make the left div stretch to the same height of the right div?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Is there some JavaScript (jQuery) code to accomplish this?</p>
</div><!-- RIGHT COLUMN -->
</div><!-- MAIN CONTAINER -->
</div><!-- WRAPPER -->
</body>
</html>
This is what it looks like:
you can get it working with js:
<script>
$(document).ready(function() {
var height = Math.max($("#left").height(), $("#right").height());
$("#left").height(height);
$("#right").height(height);
});
</script>
I've seen many attempts to do this, though none met my OCD needs. You might need to dedicate a second to get your head around this, though it is better than using JavaScript.
Known downsides:
Does not support multiple element rows in case of a container with dynamic width.
Does not work in IE6.
The base:
red is (auxiliary) container that you would use to set margin to the content.
green is position: relative; overflow: hidden and (optionally, if you want columns to be centered) text-align: center; font-size: 0; line-height: 0;
blue display: block; float: left; or (optionally, if you want columns to be centered) display: inline-block; vertical-align: top;
So far nothing out of ordinary. Whatever content that blue element has, you need to add an absolutely positioned element (yellow; note that the z-index of this element must be lower than the actual content of the blue box) with this element and set top: 0; bottom: 0; (don't set left or right position).
All your elements now have equal height. For most of the layouts, this is already sufficient. My scenario required to have dynamic content followed by a static content, where static content must be on the same line.
To achieve this, you need to add padding-bottom (dark green) eq to the fixed height content to the blue elements.
Then within the yellow elements create another absolutely positioned (left: 0; bottom: 0;) element (dark blue).
Supposedly, if these boxes (yellow) had to be active hyperlinks and you had any style that you wanted to apply to the original blue boxes, you'd use adjacent sibling selector:
yellow:hover + blue {}
Here is a the code and demo:
HTML:
<div id="products">
<ul>
<li class="product a">
<a href="">
<p class="name">Ordinary product description.</p>
<div class="icon-product"></div>
</a>
<p class="name">Ordinary product description.</p>
</li>
<li class="product b">
<a href="">
<p class="name">That lenghty product description or whatever else that does not allow you have fixed height for these elements.</p>
<div class="icon-product"></div>
</a>
<p class="name">That lenghty product description or whatever else that does not allow you have fixed height for these elements.</p>
</li>
<li class="product c">
<a href="">
<p class="name">Another ordinary product description.</p>
<div class="icon-product"></div>
</a>
<p class="name">Another ordinary product description.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
SCSS/LESS:
#products {
ul { position: relative; overflow: hidden; text-align: center; font-size: 0; line-height: 0; padding: 0; margin: 0;
li { display: inline-block; vertical-align: top; width: 130px; padding: 0 0 130px 0; margin: 0; }
}
li {
a { display: block; position: absolute; width: 130px; background: rgba(255,0,0,.5); z-index: 3; top: 0; bottom: 0;
.icon-product { background: #ccc; width: 90px; height: 90px; position: absolute; left: 20px; bottom: 20px; }
.name { opacity: 1; }
}
.name { position: relative; margin: 20px 10px 0; font-size: 14px; line-height: 18px; opacity: 0; }
a:hover {
background: #ddd; text-decoration: none;
.icon-product { background: #333; }
}
}
}
Note, that the demo is using a workaround that involves data-duplication to fix z-index. Alternatively, you could use pointer-events: none and whatever solution for IE.
here is very simple solution with a short css display:table
<div id="main" class="_dt-no-rows">
<div id="aside" contenteditable="true">
Aside
<br>
Here's the aside content
</div>
<div id="content" contenteditable="true">
Content
<br>
geht's pellentesque wurscht elementum semper tellus s'guelt Pfourtz !. gal hopla
<br>
TIP : Just clic on this block to add/remove some text
</div>
</div>
here is css
#main {
display: table;
width: 100%;
}
#aside, #content {
display: table-cell;
padding: 5px;
}
#aside {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #333333;
width: 250px;
}
#content {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #E69B00;
}
its look like this
Well, I don't do a ton of jQuery, but in the CSS/Javascript world I would just use the object model and write a statement as follows:
if(leftDiv.style.height > rightDive.style.height)
rightDiv.style.height = leftDiv.style.height;
else
leftDiv.style.height = rightDiv.style.height)
There's also a jQuery plugin called equalHeights that I've used with some success.
I'm not sure if the one I'm using is the one from the filament group mentioned above, or if it's this one that was the first google result... Either way a jquery plugin is probably the easiest, most flexible way to go.
Use this in jquery document ready function. Considering there are two divs having ids "left" and "right."
var heightR = $("#right").height();
var heightL = $("#left").height();
if(heightL > heightR){
$("#right").css({ height: heightL});
} else {
$("#left").css({ height: heightR});
}
Although many disagree with using javascript for this type of thing, here is a method that I used to acheive this using javascript alone:
var rightHeight = document.getElementById('right').clientHeight;
var leftHeight = document.getElementById('left').clientHeight;
if (leftHeight > rightHeight) {
document.getElementById('right').style.height=leftHeight+'px';
} else {
document.getElementById('left').style.height=rightHeight+'px';
}
With "left" and "right" being the id's of the two div tags.
This is what I use in plain javascript:
Seems long, but is very uncomplicated!
function equalizeHeights(elements){
//elements as array of elements (obtain like this: [document.getElementById("domElementId"),document.getElementById("anotherDomElementId")]
var heights = [];
for (var i=0;i<elements.length;i++){
heights.push(getElementHeight(elements[i],true));
}
var maxHeight = heights[biggestElementIndex(heights)];
for (var i=0;i<elements.length;i++){
setElementHeight(elements[i],maxHeight,true);
}
}
function getElementHeight(element, isTotalHeight){
// isTotalHeight triggers offsetHeight
//The offsetHeight property is similar to the clientHeight property, but it returns the height including the padding, scrollBar and the border.
//http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15615552/get-div-height-with-plain-javascript
{
isTotalHeight = typeof isTotalHeight !== 'undefined' ? isTotalHeight : true;
}
if (isTotalHeight){
return element.offsetHeight;
}else{
return element.clientHeight;
}
}
function setElementHeight(element,pixelHeight, setAsMinimumHeight){
//setAsMinimumHeight: is set, we define the minimum height, so it can still become higher if things change...
{
setAsMinimumHeight = typeof setAsMinimumHeight !== 'undefined' ? setAsMinimumHeight : false;
}
var heightStr = "" + pixelHeight + "px";
if (setAsMinimumHeight){
element.style.minHeight = heightStr; // pixels
}else{
element.style.height = heightStr; // pixels
}
}
function biggestElementIndex(arr){
//http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11301438/return-index-of-greatest-value-in-an-array
var max = arr[0];
var maxIndex = 0;
for (var i = 1; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > max) {
maxIndex = i;
max = arr[i];
}
}
return maxIndex;
}
I agree with initial answer but the JS solution with equal_heights() method does not work in some situations, imagine you have products next to each other. If you were to apply it only to the parent container yes they will be same height but the product name sections might differ if one does not fit to two line, this is where i would suggest using below
https://jsfiddle.net/0hdtLfy5/3/
function make_children_same_height(element_parent, child_elements) {
for (i = 0; i < child_elements.length; i++) {
var tallest = 0;
var an_element = child_elements[i];
$(element_parent).children(an_element).each(function() {
// using outer height since that includes the border and padding
if(tallest < $(this).outerHeight() ){
tallest = $(this).outerHeight();
}
});
tallest = tallest+1; // some weird shit going on with half a pixel or something in FF and IE9, no time to figure out now, sowwy, hence adding 1 px
$(element_parent).children(an_element).each(function() {
$(this).css('min-height',tallest+'px');
});
}
}