Develop Reference

How to split code into several bundles with Vue CLI3

I have a Vue project using TypeScript and built by Vue-CLI3.
What I'm trying to achieve is to get Webpack to build separate bundles for my workers. I've read about Webpack Code Splitting and about configureWebpack in vue.config.js, but so far had no luck in putting them together.
The project setup is the standard vue create type. I have a ./src/main.ts as the main entry point and a bunch of TypeScript modules, I want as separate bundles with their own dependency trees (I'm fine with code duplication if it can't be avoided).
I'd like to get
./dist/js/all main stuff
./dist/js/workers/worker1.6e3ebec8.js
./dist/js/workers/worker2.712f2df5.js
./dist/js/workers/worker3.83041b4b.js
So I could do new Worker(worker1.6e3ebec8.js) in the main code.
I could launch workers from the main package by generating javascript code, putting it into a blob and instantiating from that, but it looks rather awkward. Besides, my worker code import other modules, so it doesn't seem to be an option anyway.
I'm quite new to all of this, so maybe I'm not even heading in the right direction.
What is the usual way of doing that on this stack?

You can use import(), it will return a Promise and will resolve your module.
As you are using Vue-CLI 3, webpack is ready and it should split your bundle automatically.
const moduleName = 'coolModuleName'
import (
/* webpackChunkName: "[moduleName]" */
`#/my/module/path/${moduleName}.js`
).then(moduleCode => {
// use your module
})
// load them in parallel
const getModuleDynamically(path, moduleName) => import(
/* webpackChunkName: "[moduleName]" */
`#/${path}/${moduleName}.js`
)
Promise.all([
getModuleDynamically(path, moduleName1),
getModuleDynamically(path, moduleName2),
getModuleDynamically(path, moduleName3)
])

Got there! #aquilesb's answer did help, although I've failed to get getModuleDynamically() from the answer working after plenty of experimenting.
Update: Looks like with this solution I'm not able to use imports of npm modules. I've tried experimenting with worker-loader but haven't got anywhere so far.
Here are a few takeaways:
Create a separate webpack config for packing workers. The target: 'webworker' must be there. Call it with webpack --config ./webpack.config.workers.js, as Vue wouldn't know about that.
Create a separate tsconfig.json for workers TypeScript. The lib setting for workers must be there: "lib": ["esnext","webworker","scripthost"] as well as the proper include:[...]/exclude:[...] settings.
You may need to tell Vue to use the main tsconfig.json that has it's own "lib":["esnext","dom","dom.iterable","scripthost"] and include/exclude. This is done in vue.config.js, you will probably need to create it. I use chainWebpack configuration option of Vue config.
Let Webpack know you have dynamic loading by making calls to import() with static (i.e. not variable) names. I haven't found a way to do so in config file, but it doesn't matter: you can't help hardcoding the names somewhere, how else Webpack would know it has to bundle and split the code?
Somehow get the name(s) of generated files, as you must have at least one of them at runtime to do new Worker(filename). I used the --json option of Webpack CLI for that.
There are many ways all of this can be achieved. This is what this ended up looking like in my project:
Folder structure:
webpack.config.workers.js
vue.config.js
tsconfig.base.json
src/main/
src/main/tsconfig.json -- extends tsconfig.base.json
src/shared/ -- this code may be duplicated by the Vue app bundles and by workers bundle
src/workers/
src/workers/tsconfig.json -- extends tsconfig.base.json
webpack.config.workers.js: contains a single entry – the main worker file, that loads the other stuff.
entry: {
worker: './src/workers/worker.ts'
}
build.workers.sh: the script calls Webpack CLI and produces a JSON file with the resulting workers names (trivial actions on folders are omitted). The only one I need is called "worker". The rest is to be dynamically loaded by it.
#!/bin/bash
# Map entry name -> bundle file name
# "assetsByChunkName":{"entryN":"entryN.[hash].js", ...}
json=$(webpack --config ./webpack.config.workers.js --json $#|tr -d "\n\r\t "|grep -Eo '"assetsByChunkName":.+?}')
# Remove "assetsByChunkName"
json=$(echo "${json:20}")
echo $json
echo $json > "$target/$folder/workers.json"
Load workers.json at runtime. The other option would be to use it at compile time by providing Vue config with const VUE_APP_MAIN_WORKER = require("path to/workers.json").worker and using this env constant.
Now that we have the name of the main worker file, we can do new Worker("main worker file path we've got from webpack").
The main worker file contains the function that statically references other modules and dynamically loads them. This way Webpack knows what to bundle and how to split the code.
enum WorkerName {
sodium = "sodium",
socket = "socket"
}
function importModule(name: WorkerName): Promise<any> {
switch (name) {
case WorkerName.sodium:
return import(
/* webpackChunkName: "sodium" */
"workers/sodium"
);
case WorkerName.socket:
return import(
/* webpackChunkName: "socket" */
"workers/socket"
);
}
}
Use the postMessage/message event API to tell your main worker code what to load.
const messageHandler = (e: MessageEvent) => {
// here goes app-specific implementation of events
// that gets you the moduleName in the end
importModule(moduleName).then((work) => {
// do smth
});
};

Now, to the correct answer.
To achieve the following:
Using webworkers
Using both dynamic imports and normal imports in webworker code
Sharing code between webworkers and main app
I had to add a separate rule for worker-loader in vue.config.js and also to add babel-loader. It took me some time to find the correct solution, but I dropped the previous one (in my other answer) in the end. I still use separate tsconfig.js for main and for webworkers.
What I'm still not happy with, is that vue-cli–or rather fork-ts-checker plugin–doesn't seem to know the webworker-specific types in my worker classes (so I can't use DedicatedWorkerScope, for instance).

How to bundle react components which would be needed dynamically?

We have several applications deployed which were with plain html and js.
These applications should be completely independent modules without affecting other applications deployed.
But we should be able to load from one application to another if the situation needs which will be dynamically decided by business.
We were able to load different application screens by simply giving the relative path as there was no dependency bundling previously.
Now we are converting them to react applications with webpack as bundler.
Here we have to use dynamic import if we are going to need something dynamically. That also works on patterns which should be given at the build time.
So is there any way to achieve this kind of dynamic pattern using webpack bundler?
For importing screen components, code is something like below,
Promise.all(reqList.map(modulePath =>
{
return import(/* webpackMode: "lazy-once" */`../../../${modulePath}.jsx`)
})).then(modules => {doStuff()})
As they all are parallelly deployed applications we are trying to go back 3 folders (i.e, root folder like webapps in tomcat) and access the other application path, which will be derived dynamically in modulePath variable.
So while importing, webpack tries to import from the chunks which has already been loaded on first application launch. But this loaded chunks are not having the screens from other applications yet.
We have tried giving each jsx files as entry points in webpack which did created independent files but if we make them as entry files, they should be attached to the index.html manually, Which would cease export in jsx to work.
My wepack config is something like below,
function getEntries(pattern) {
const entries = {};
glob.sync(pattern).forEach((file) => {
let fileName = file.substr(0,file.indexOf("."));
entries[fileName.replace('src/', '')] = path.join(__dirname, file);
});
return entries;
}
let jsxFiles = getEntries('src/**/*.jsx');
console.log(Object.keys(jsxFiles));
module.exports = {
entry: jsxFiles,
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, './dist'),
filename: '[name].js',
chunkFilename: "AppId"+'.js'
}
}
The first application is loading fine as webpack is able to find the bundled chunks but when we try to load different application screen components, dynamic importing fails saying module not found.
Is there any way we can achieve this kind of dynamic imports?
Thanks for going through such a long post, I didn't had a choice but to explain.. :)

Essentially, you are looking for dynamic module loading. You would need to webpack each module separately.
To load them, you have several options
Use the browser's native import(), but IE, Edge, and Firefox don't support it, yet
Use a module loader library
SystemJS
RequireJS, although it's rather old
In case of going with a module loader, you need to webpack your modules to the corresponding System.register or AMD formats

Using require with root path variable in VSCode

I am using global variable __root with path of my root app directory then I am using require to load code from other files.
const Parser = require(__root + '/parsers/Parser')
The issue is that vscode does not understand what is happening:
Intellisense does not work
Object type is shown as any (if path is correct vscode grabs right type)
What are the options to solve this? Can you share your practices to resolve this issue?

VS Code's intellisense cannot understand dynamic import paths like root + '/path'. There are no workarounds for this, nor are the plans to address this in the immediate future.
However, with static require import paths, you can configure how VS Code resolves the imports by configuring a jsconfig.json. The two options you probably want are baseUrl and paths
Setting up a jsconfig.json will not change the runtime behavior of your code, only how VS Code IntelliSense handles your project. You can use a jsconfig.json along with webpack aliases

Require third party RequireJS modules with Webpack

I'm working on an application that needs to pull in the ReadiumJS library, which uses AMD modules. The app itself is written in es6 w/ webpack and babel. I've gotten the vendor bundle working correctly, and it's pulling in the built Readium file, but when I try to require any of the modules Webpack says it can't resolve them. Anyone ever do this before with Webpack and RequireJS? Here's some info that may help - not sure what else to include as this is my first time really using Webpack..
Folder Structure
/readium-src
/readium-js
/ *** all readium-specific files and build output (have to pull down repo and build locally)
/node_modules
/src
/app.js -> main entry for my app
/webpack.config.babel.js
webpack.config.js entries
entry: {
vendorJs: [
'jquery',
'angular',
'../readium-src/readium-js/build-output/_single-bundle/readium-js_all.js',
'bootstrap/js/alert.js' //bootstrap js example
],
appJs: './app.js'
}
Trying to require it in app.js
var readiumSharedGlobals = require('readium_shared_js/globals');
I never really got into using RequireJS, so really struggling to understand how to consume that type of module along side other types of modules with webpack. Any help greatly appreciated :)
Update
If I change my app.js to use this instead:
window.rqReadium = require('../readium-src/readium-js/build-output/_single-bundle/readium-js_all.js');
Then it appears to try to load all the modules, but I get a strange error:
Uncaught Error: No IPv6
At this point, I'm unsure of
Should I have to require the entire path like that?
Is this error something from webpack, requirejs, or Readium? Tried debugging, but couldn't find anything useful...
UPDATE 8/12/2016
I think this is related to an issue with a library that Readium is depending on: https://github.com/medialize/URI.js/issues/118
However, I'm still not clear on how to correctly import AMD modules with webpack. Here's what I mean:
Let's say I have an amd module defined in moneyService.amd.js like this:
define('myMoneyService', ['jquery'], function($) {
//contrived simple example...
return function getDollaz() { console.log('$$$'); }
});
Then, in a sibling file, app.js, I want to pull in that file.
//this works
var getDollaz = require('./moneyService.amd.js');
//this works
require(['./moneyService.amd.js'], function(getDollaz) { getDollaz(); }
//this does not
require(['myMoneyService' /*require by its ID vs file name*/], function(getDollaz) {
getDollaz();
}
So, if we cannot require named modules, how would we work with a third party lib's dist file that has all the modules bundled into a single file?

Ok, so there's a repo out there for an Electron ePub reader using Readium, and it's using webpack: https://github.com/clebeaupin/readium-electron This shows a great way to handle pulling in RequireJS modules with webpack.
One super awesome thing I found is that you can specify output.library and output.libraryTarget and webpack will transpose from one module format to another... freaking awesome! So, I can import the requirejs module, set output library and libraryTarget to 'readium-js' and 'commonjs2' respectively, then inside my application code I can do import Readium from 'readium-js';

Require JS files dynamically on runtime using webpack

I am trying to port a library from grunt/requirejs to webpack and stumbled upon a problem, that might be a game-breaker for this endeavor.
The library I try to port has a function, that loads and evaluates multiple modules - based on their filenames that we get from a config file - into our app. The code looks like this (coffee):
loadModules = (arrayOfFilePaths) ->
new Promise (resolve) ->
require arrayOfFilePaths, (ms...) ->
for module in ms
module ModuleAPI
resolve()
The require here needs to be called on runtime and behave like it did with requireJS. Webpack seems to only care about what happens in the "build-process".
Is this something that webpack fundamentally doesn't care about? If so, can I still use requireJS with it? What is a good solution to load assets dynamically during runtime?
edit: loadModule can load modules, that are not present on the build-time of this library. They will be provided by the app, that implements my library.

So I found that my requirement to have some files loaded on runtime, that are only available on "app-compile-time" and not on "library-compile-time" is not easily possible with webpack.
I will change the mechanism, so that my library doesn't require the files anymore, but needs to be passed the required modules. Somewhat tells me, this is gonna be the better API anyways.
edit to clarify:
Basically, instead of:
// in my library
load = (path_to_file) ->
(require path_to_file).do_something()
// in my app (using the 'compiled' libary)
cool_library.load("file_that_exists_in_my_app")
I do this:
// in my library
load = (module) ->
module.do_something()
// in my app (using the 'compiled' libary)
module = require("file_that_exists_in_my_app")
cool_library.load(module)
The first code worked in require.js but not in webpack.
In hindsight i feel its pretty wrong to have a 3rd-party-library load files at runtime anyway.

There is concept named context (http://webpack.github.io/docs/context.html), it allows to make dynamic requires.
Also there is a possibility to define code split points: http://webpack.github.io/docs/code-splitting.html
function loadInContext(filename) {
return new Promise(function(resolve){
require(['./'+filename], resolve);
})
}
function loadModules(namesInContext){
return Promise.all(namesInContext.map(loadInContext));
}
And use it like following:
loadModules(arrayOfFiles).then(function(){
modules.forEach(function(module){
module(moduleAPI);
})
});
But likely it is not what you need - you will have a lot of chunks instead of one bundle with all required modules, and likely it would not be optimal..
It is better to define module requires in you config file, and include it to your build:
// modulesConfig.js
module.exports = [
require(...),
....
]
// run.js
require('modulesConfig').forEach(function(module){
module(moduleAPI);
})

You can also try using a library such as this: https://github.com/Venryx/webpack-runtime-require
Disclaimer: I'm its developer. I wrote it because I was also frustrated with the inability to freely access module contents at runtime. (in my case, for testing from the console)