Develop Reference

How to resolve a promise with a parameter in setTimeout [duplicate]

I have some JavaScript code that looks like:
function statechangedPostQuestion()
{
//alert("statechangedPostQuestion");
if (xmlhttp.readyState==4)
{
var topicId = xmlhttp.responseText;
setTimeout("postinsql(topicId)",4000);
}
}
function postinsql(topicId)
{
//alert(topicId);
}
I get an error that topicId is not defined
Everything was working before I used the setTimeout() function.
I want my postinsql(topicId) function to be called after some time.
What should I do?

setTimeout(function() {
postinsql(topicId);
}, 4000)
You need to feed an anonymous function as a parameter instead of a string, the latter method shouldn't even work per the ECMAScript specification but browsers are just lenient. This is the proper solution, don't ever rely on passing a string as a 'function' when using setTimeout() or setInterval(), it's slower because it has to be evaluated and it just isn't right.
UPDATE:
As Hobblin said in his comments to the question, now you can pass arguments to the function inside setTimeout using Function.prototype.bind().
Example:
setTimeout(postinsql.bind(null, topicId), 4000);

In modern browsers (ie IE11 and beyond), the "setTimeout" receives a third parameter that is sent as parameter to the internal function at the end of the timer.
Example:
var hello = "Hello World";
setTimeout(alert, 1000, hello);
More details:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WindowTimers.setTimeout
http://arguments.callee.info/2008/11/10/passing-arguments-to-settimeout-and-setinterval/

After doing some research and testing, the only correct implementation is:
setTimeout(yourFunctionReference, 4000, param1, param2, paramN);
setTimeout will pass all extra parameters to your function so they can be processed there.
The anonymous function can work for very basic stuff, but within instance of a object where you have to use "this", there is no way to make it work.
Any anonymous function will change "this" to point to window, so you will lose your object reference.

This is a very old question with an already "correct" answer but I thought I'd mention another approach that nobody has mentioned here. This is copied and pasted from the excellent underscore library:
_.delay = function(func, wait) {
var args = slice.call(arguments, 2);
return setTimeout(function(){ return func.apply(null, args); }, wait);
};
You can pass as many arguments as you'd like to the function called by setTimeout and as an added bonus (well, usually a bonus) the value of the arguments passed to your function are frozen when you call setTimeout, so if they change value at some point between when setTimeout() is called and when it times out, well... that's not so hideously frustrating anymore :)
Here's a fiddle where you can see what I mean.

I recently came across the unique situation of needing to use a setTimeout in a loop. Understanding this can help you understand how to pass parameters to setTimeout.
Method 1
Use forEach and Object.keys, as per Sukima's suggestion:
var testObject = {
prop1: 'test1',
prop2: 'test2',
prop3: 'test3'
};
Object.keys(testObject).forEach(function(propertyName, i) {
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(testObject[propertyName]);
}, i * 1000);
});
I recommend this method.
Method 2
Use bind:
var i = 0;
for (var propertyName in testObject) {
setTimeout(function(propertyName) {
console.log(testObject[propertyName]);
}.bind(this, propertyName), i++ * 1000);
}
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/MsBkW/
Method 3
Or if you can't use forEach or bind, use an IIFE:
var i = 0;
for (var propertyName in testObject) {
setTimeout((function(propertyName) {
return function() {
console.log(testObject[propertyName]);
};
})(propertyName), i++ * 1000);
}
Method 4
But if you don't care about IE < 10, then you could use Fabio's suggestion:
var i = 0;
for (var propertyName in testObject) {
setTimeout(function(propertyName) {
console.log(testObject[propertyName]);
}, i++ * 1000, propertyName);
}
Method 5 (ES6)
Use a block scoped variable:
let i = 0;
for (let propertyName in testObject) {
setTimeout(() => console.log(testObject[propertyName]), i++ * 1000);
}
Though I would still recommend using Object.keys with forEach in ES6.

Hobblin already commented this on the question, but it should be an answer really!
Using Function.prototype.bind() is the cleanest and most flexible way to do this (with the added bonus of being able to set the this context):
setTimeout(postinsql.bind(null, topicId), 4000);
For more information see these MDN links:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/DOM/window.setTimeout#highlighter_547041
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function/bind#With_setTimeout

You can pass the parameter to the setTimeout callback function as:
setTimeout(function, milliseconds, param1, param2, ...)
eg.
function myFunction() {
setTimeout(alertMsg, 3000, "Hello");
}
function alertMsg(message) {
alert(message)
}

Some answers are correct but convoluted.
I am answering this again, 4 years later, because I still run into overly complex code to solve exactly this question. There IS an elegant solution.
First of all, do not pass in a string as the first parameter when calling setTimeout because it effectively invokes a call to the slow "eval" function.
So how do we pass in a parameter to a timeout function? By using closure:
settopic=function(topicid){
setTimeout(function(){
//thanks to closure, topicid is visible here
postinsql(topicid);
},4000);
}
...
if (xhr.readyState==4){
settopic(xhr.responseText);
}
Some have suggested using anonymous function when calling the timeout function:
if (xhr.readyState==4){
setTimeout(function(){
settopic(xhr.responseText);
},4000);
}
The syntax works out. But by the time settopic is called, i.e. 4 seconds later, the XHR object may not be the same. Therefore it's important to pre-bind the variables.

I know its been 10 yrs since this question was asked, but still, if you have scrolled till here, i assume you're still facing some issue. The solution by Meder Omuraliev is the simplest one and may help most of us but for those who don't want to have any binding, here it is:
Use Param for setTimeout
setTimeout(function(p){
//p == param1
},3000,param1);
Use Immediately Invoked Function Expression(IIFE)
let param1 = 'demon';
setTimeout(function(p){
// p == 'demon'
},2000,(function(){
return param1;
})()
);
Solution to the question
function statechangedPostQuestion()
{
//alert("statechangedPostQuestion");
if (xmlhttp.readyState==4)
{
setTimeout(postinsql,4000,(function(){
return xmlhttp.responseText;
})());
}
}
function postinsql(topicId)
{
//alert(topicId);
}

Replace
setTimeout("postinsql(topicId)", 4000);
with
setTimeout("postinsql(" + topicId + ")", 4000);
or better still, replace the string expression with an anonymous function
setTimeout(function () { postinsql(topicId); }, 4000);
EDIT:
Brownstone's comment is incorrect, this will work as intended, as demonstrated by running this in the Firebug console
(function() {
function postinsql(id) {
console.log(id);
}
var topicId = 3
window.setTimeout("postinsql(" + topicId + ")",4000); // outputs 3 after 4 seconds
})();
Note that I'm in agreeance with others that you should avoid passing a string to setTimeout as this will call eval() on the string and instead pass a function.

My answer:
setTimeout((function(topicId) {
return function() {
postinsql(topicId);
};
})(topicId), 4000);
Explanation:
The anonymous function created returns another anonymous function. This function has access to the originally passed topicId, so it will not make an error. The first anonymous function is immediately called, passing in topicId, so the registered function with a delay has access to topicId at the time of calling, through closures.
OR
This basically converts to:
setTimeout(function() {
postinsql(topicId); // topicId inside higher scope (passed to returning function)
}, 4000);
EDIT: I saw the same answer, so look at his. But I didn't steal his answer! I just forgot to look. Read the explanation and see if it helps to understand the code.

The easiest cross browser solution for supporting parameters in setTimeout:
setTimeout(function() {
postinsql(topicId);
}, 4000)
If you don't mind not supporting IE 9 and lower:
setTimeout(postinsql, 4000, topicId);
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WindowTimers/setTimeout

I know it's old but I wanted to add my (preferred) flavour to this.
I think a pretty readable way to achieve this is to pass the topicId to a function, which in turn uses the argument to reference the topic ID internally. This value won't change even if topicId in the outside will be changed shortly after.
var topicId = xmlhttp.responseText;
var fDelayed = function(tid) {
return function() {
postinsql(tid);
};
}
setTimeout(fDelayed(topicId),4000);
or short:
var topicId = xmlhttp.responseText;
setTimeout(function(tid) {
return function() { postinsql(tid); };
}(topicId), 4000);

The answer by David Meister seems to take care of parameters that may change immediately after the call to setTimeout() but before the anonymous function is called. But it's too cumbersome and not very obvious. I discovered an elegant way of doing pretty much the same thing using IIFE (immediately inviked function expression).
In the example below, the currentList variable is passed to the IIFE, which saves it in its closure, until the delayed function is invoked. Even if the variable currentList changes immediately after the code shown, the setInterval() will do the right thing.
Without this IIFE technique, the setTimeout() function will definitely get called for each h2 element in the DOM, but all those calls will see only the text value of the last h2 element.
<script>
// Wait for the document to load.
$(document).ready(function() {
$("h2").each(function (index) {
currentList = $(this).text();
(function (param1, param2) {
setTimeout(function() {
$("span").text(param1 + ' : ' + param2 );
}, param1 * 1000);
})(index, currentList);
});
</script>

In general, if you need to pass a function as a callback with specific parameters, you can use higher order functions. This is pretty elegant with ES6:
const someFunction = (params) => () => {
//do whatever
};
setTimeout(someFunction(params), 1000);
Or if someFunction is first order:
setTimeout(() => someFunction(params), 1000);

Note that the reason topicId was "not defined" per the error message is that it existed as a local variable when the setTimeout was executed, but not when the delayed call to postinsql happened. Variable lifetime is especially important to pay attention to, especially when trying something like passing "this" as an object reference.
I heard that you can pass topicId as a third parameter to the setTimeout function. Not much detail is given but I got enough information to get it to work, and it's successful in Safari. I don't know what they mean about the "millisecond error" though. Check it out here:
http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/tutorials/javascript/timers

How i resolved this stage ?
just like that :
setTimeout((function(_deepFunction ,_deepData){
var _deepResultFunction = function _deepResultFunction(){
_deepFunction(_deepData);
};
return _deepResultFunction;
})(fromOuterFunction, fromOuterData ) , 1000 );
setTimeout wait a reference to a function, so i created it in a closure, which interprete my data and return a function with a good instance of my data !
Maybe you can improve this part :
_deepFunction(_deepData);
// change to something like :
_deepFunction.apply(contextFromParams , args);
I tested it on chrome, firefox and IE and it execute well, i don't know about performance but i needed it to be working.
a sample test :
myDelay_function = function(fn , params , ctxt , _time){
setTimeout((function(_deepFunction ,_deepData, _deepCtxt){
var _deepResultFunction = function _deepResultFunction(){
//_deepFunction(_deepData);
_deepFunction.call( _deepCtxt , _deepData);
};
return _deepResultFunction;
})(fn , params , ctxt)
, _time)
};
// the function to be used :
myFunc = function(param){ console.log(param + this.name) }
// note that we call this.name
// a context object :
myObjet = {
id : "myId" ,
name : "myName"
}
// setting a parmeter
myParamter = "I am the outer parameter : ";
//and now let's make the call :
myDelay_function(myFunc , myParamter , myObjet , 1000)
// this will produce this result on the console line :
// I am the outer parameter : myName
Maybe you can change the signature to make it more complient :
myNass_setTimeOut = function (fn , _time , params , ctxt ){
return setTimeout((function(_deepFunction ,_deepData, _deepCtxt){
var _deepResultFunction = function _deepResultFunction(){
//_deepFunction(_deepData);
_deepFunction.apply( _deepCtxt , _deepData);
};
return _deepResultFunction;
})(fn , params , ctxt)
, _time)
};
// and try again :
for(var i=0; i<10; i++){
myNass_setTimeOut(console.log ,1000 , [i] , console)
}
And finaly to answer the original question :
myNass_setTimeOut( postinsql, 4000, topicId );
Hope it can help !
ps : sorry but english it's not my mother tongue !

this works in all browsers (IE is an oddball)
setTimeout( (function(x) {
return function() {
postinsql(x);
};
})(topicId) , 4000);

if you want to pass variable as param lets try this
if requirement is function and var as parmas then try this
setTimeout((param1,param2) => {
alert(param1 + param2);
postinsql(topicId);
},2000,'msg1', 'msg2')
if requirement is only variables as a params then try this
setTimeout((param1,param2) => { alert(param1 + param2) },2000,'msg1', 'msg2')
You can try this with ES5 and ES6

setTimeout is part of the DOM defined by WHAT WG.
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/timers-and-user-prompts.html
The method you want is:—
handle = self.setTimeout( handler [, timeout [, arguments... ] ] )
Schedules a timeout to run handler after timeout milliseconds. Any
arguments are passed straight through to the handler.
setTimeout(postinsql, 4000, topicId);
Apparently, extra arguments are supported in IE10. Alternatively, you can use setTimeout(postinsql.bind(null, topicId), 4000);, however passing extra arguments is simpler, and that's preferable.
Historical factoid: In days of VBScript, in JScript, setTimeout's third parameter was the language, as a string, defaulting to "JScript" but with the option to use "VBScript". https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/internet-explorer/ie-developer/platform-apis/aa741500(v%3Dvs.85)

You can try default functionality of 'apply()' something like this, you can pass more number of arguments as your requirement in the array
function postinsql(topicId)
{
//alert(topicId);
}
setTimeout(
postinsql.apply(window,["mytopic"])
,500);

//Some function, with some arguments, that need to run with arguments
var a = function a(b, c, d, e){console.log(b, c, d, e);}
//Another function, where setTimeout using for function "a", this have the same arguments
var f = function f(b, c, d, e){ setTimeout(a.apply(this, arguments), 100);}
f(1,2,3,4); //run
//Another function, where setTimeout using for function "a", but some another arguments using, in different order
var g = function g(b, c, d, e){ setTimeout(function(d, c, b){a.apply(this, arguments);}, 100, d, c, b);}
g(1,2,3,4);

#Jiri Vetyska thanks for the post, but there is something wrong in your example.
I needed to pass the target which is hovered out (this) to a timed out function and I tried your approach. Tested in IE9 - does not work.
I also made some research and it appears that as pointed here the third parameter is the script language being used. No mention about additional parameters.
So, I followed #meder's answer and solved my issue with this code:
$('.targetItemClass').hover(ItemHoverIn, ItemHoverOut);
function ItemHoverIn() {
//some code here
}
function ItemHoverOut() {
var THIS = this;
setTimeout(
function () { ItemHoverOut_timeout(THIS); },
100
);
}
function ItemHoverOut_timeout(target) {
//do something with target which is hovered out
}
Hope, this is usefull for someone else.

As there is a problem with the third optonal parameter in IE and using closures prevents us from changing the variables (in a loop for example) and still achieving the desired result, I suggest the following solution.
We can try using recursion like this:
var i = 0;
var hellos = ["Hello World1!", "Hello World2!", "Hello World3!", "Hello World4!", "Hello World5!"];
if(hellos.length > 0) timeout();
function timeout() {
document.write('<p>' + hellos[i] + '<p>');
i++;
if (i < hellos.length)
setTimeout(timeout, 500);
}
We need to make sure that nothing else changes these variables and that we write a proper recursion condition to avoid infinite recursion.

// These are three very simple and concise answers:
function fun() {
console.log(this.prop1, this.prop2, this.prop3);
}
let obj = { prop1: 'one', prop2: 'two', prop3: 'three' };
let bound = fun.bind(obj);
setTimeout(bound, 3000);
// or
function funOut(par1, par2, par3) {
return function() {
console.log(par1, par2, par3);
}
};
setTimeout(funOut('one', 'two', 'three'), 5000);
// or
let funny = function(a, b, c) { console.log(a, b, c); };
setTimeout(funny, 2000, 'hello', 'worldly', 'people');

// These are three very simple and concise answers:
function fun() {
console.log(this.prop1, this.prop2, this.prop3);
}
let obj = { prop1: 'one', prop2: 'two', prop3: 'three' };
let bound = fun.bind(obj);
setTimeout(bound, 3000);
// or
function funOut(par1, par2, par3) {
return function() {
console.log(par1, par2, par3);
}
};
setTimeout(funOut('one', 'two', 'three'), 5000);
// or
let funny = function(a, b, c) { console.log(a, b, c); };
setTimeout(funny, 2000, 'hello', 'worldly', 'people');

I think you want:
setTimeout("postinsql(" + topicId + ")", 4000);

You have to remove quotes from your setTimeOut function call like this:
setTimeout(postinsql(topicId),4000);

Answering the question but by a simple addition function with 2 arguments.
var x = 3, y = 4;
setTimeout(function(arg1, arg2) {
return () => delayedSum(arg1, arg2);
}(x, y), 1000);
function delayedSum(param1, param2) {
alert(param1 + param2); // 7
}

Can't use setTimeout to undo boolean

In my Javascript code I am trying to set up this code
if(this.boolean == true) {
setTimeout(function(){ this.boolean = false; }, 2000);
}
But for some reason it won't work, the boolean just remains true. How can I fix this/what can I do instead?
The setTimeout works with other lines of code but weirdly not this one.

this behaves in a special way in JavaScript.
Change
setTimeout(function(){ this.boolean = false; }, 2000);
to
setTimeout(() => { this.boolean = false; }, 2000);
and the this keyword will be interpreted block-scoped.

It's because of "this" - you can use a closure to do this:
var x = this;
var onTimeout = function(){
x.boolean = false;
}
if(this.boolean == true) {
setTimeout(onTimeout, 2000);
}
"this" is not what you think it is inside the setTimeout function:
setTimeout and "this" in JavaScript
If you have ES6 available, arrow functions use their lexical scope for this
var onTimeout = () => this.boolean = false;
setTimeout(onTimeout , 2000);
More about that here:
https://medium.com/tfogo/advantages-and-pitfalls-of-arrow-functions-a16f0835799e

If you are not using arrow function, the this variable will be the one from setTimeout and not your main class because of its scope.
The following should resolve the issue.
if(this.boolean == true) {
setTimeout(() => { this.boolean = false; }, 2000);
}

Functions have their own this, so this.boolean inside of function implies that you are trying to change the property boolean of the function itself. On the other hand, if you use arrow functions, you can avoid that because arrow functions don't have their own this.
setTimeout(() => { this.boolean = false }, 2000)

The scope of "this" is changed in your function inside the setTimeout.
You could use the arrow function like other commenters have said.
Or, you can set a var as this, and then use that var in the functions inside the SetTimeout.
var coolThis = this;
if(coolThis.boolean == true) {
setTimeout(function(){ coolThis.boolean = false; }, 2000);
}

Workaround for SonarError for 'Named function expressions should not be used'

const objTimeout = setTimeout(
function firePostMessagesToSubTab() {
if (boolRemoved) {
clearTimeout(objTimeout);
} else {
soneAsyncMethod.then(function () {
setTimeout(firePostMessagesToSubTab, 1000);
});
}
}, 1000);
I have written a recursive setTimeout but our sonar filter is throwing error as
'Named function expressions should not be used'.
Is there a workaround for this? There is no way that the sonar rule can be removed (Clients...). Also I have deliberately used setTimeOut and not setInterval because setInterval does not wait for the method to get finished.

function firePostMessagesToSubTab() {
Here firePostMessagesToSubTab is the name of the function. Basically the code analysis tool is suggesting that you use an anonymous function or declare the function separately from the setTimeout invocation.
Change your code to following and it should pass the rule
function firePostMessagesToSubTab() {
if (boolRemoved) {
clearTimeout(objTimeout);
} else {
soneAsyncMethod.then(function () {
setTimeout(firePostMessagesToSubTab, 1000);
});
}
}
const objTimeout = setTimeout(firePostMessagesToSubTab, 1000);

Combine 2 function of javascript / Type script into one

I Have one Date variable, and I am updating it every second to make it live.
Now here is my variable.
var stationdate = new Date(data.localTime);
My Javascript code to update it per second.
window.setInterval(function () {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
}, 1000);
And My Type Script code to return it to Angular UI.
window.setInterval(() => this.time = stationdate, 1000);
My Issue.
It works perfectly if both functions are seprate.
but it stops working if I combine them.
see below.
window.setInterval(function () {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}, 1000);
AM I MISSING SOMETHING WITH FAT ARROW OF TYPE SCRIPT?
What should be the proper function?

Each function has it's own this context. So your this refers to another object in the function expression. With arrow function it refers to the outer this which contains that arrow function.
Use arrow syntax and there is no necessary to use window prefix behind the setInterval.
setInterval(() => {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}, 1000);
For more read Arrow function vs function declaration/expression - this is one of the main concepts in Javascript.

In your combination of both function your not using an arrow function, which leads to the context of this is window. Use an arrow function to keep the outer context of this.
window.setInterval(() => {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}, 1000);

In your second example, this refers to the inner-scope of your function not the outer scope where your variable is most likely defined. Therefore as others have suggested, you need to use the lambda symbol.
Also, since you're using AngularJS it would be preferable to use $interval instead of window.setInterval().
Note that by using $interval, a $scope.$apply() will be made to do dirty-checking if your variable has changed and then update the UI. This is not a given when using window.setInterval(). Alternatively, you can still tell $interval to not use $apply if that is something you need.

It common bug of using callbacks. All in javascript has own 'this' context (except arrow functions). Just for systems function this===undefined.
So proper way is use arrow function (as it shown above). Best for modern browsers (or transpiled code).
window.setInterval(() => {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}, 1000);
Another way to store 'this' is binding context:
window.setInterval((function () {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}).bind(this), 1000);
Or more explanation:
window.setInterval(
(function(){console.log(this.hello);}).bind({hello:'hello!'})
, 1000);

window.setInterval( () => {
stationdate = new Date(stationdate.setSeconds(stationdate.getSeconds() + 1));
this.time = stationdate;
}, 1000);
In your code this has wrong context.
The fat arrow function is feature of ES6 and has nothing to do with TypeScript

Javascript Restart Timer From Within Closure

I'm trying to figure out how I can reset a timer created inside of an immediately invoking function from within the setTimeout closure. Here is my function:
var triggerHeightRecalc = function() {
setTimeout(function() {
if(imagesLoaded()) {
adjustHeight();
} else {
triggerHeightRecalc();
}
}, 100);
}();
In the event that imagesLoaded() returns false, I receive the following error from attempting to call triggerHeightRecalc():
Uncaught TypeError: undefined is not a function
So I'm not sure if the issue is the function is not in the scope, or maybe it just cannot call itself? I've tried passing triggerHeightRecalc as a parameter in the setTimeout closure, but that doesn't seem to work either.
I've also tried this after reading this SO question:
var triggerHeightRecalc = function() {
var that = this;
var callback = function() {
if(imagesLoaded()) {
adjustHeight();
} else {
that.triggerHeightRecalc();
}
};
timeDelay = window.setTimeout(callback, 100);
}();
What am I doing wrong here, or is there a better way? Is this something that should be a setInterval() instead and I clear the interval when images are loaded?
Side Note: I'm calculating the height of a div inside a jQuery plugin, but I need to wait until the images are loaded in order to get the correct height (not sure if that is relevant).

Since you are invoking the function right from the declaration triggerHeightRecalc is getting set to the return of that function call, which is undefined since you in fact do not return anything.
You can do two things
1. Declare then invoke
var triggerHeightRecalc = function() {
setTimeout(function() {
if(imagesLoaded()) {
adjustHeight();
} else {
triggerHeightRecalc();
}
}, 100);
};
triggerHeightRecalc();
2. Wrap the declaration in () and invoke
var triggerHeightRecalc;
(triggerHeightRecalc = function() {
setTimeout(function() {
if(imagesLoaded()) {
adjustHeight();
} else {
triggerHeightRecalc();
}
}, 100);
})();
The second one will create a global variable unless you do the var triggerHeightRecalc; before hand.

Already answered, but I'll put this in.
First of all, if you just want to wait until all images have loaded you can use:
https://github.com/desandro/imagesloaded and then run the above code.
If that's not what you want, and you you just want a function that your setTimeout can run, then you can remove the () at the end of the function.
Here is what's happening in your current code
Your function is missing the opening bracket or similar character !+( (function.
Also your IIFE has no return keyword, and will return undefined to triggerHeightCalc.
If you do want an IIFE then you can either have a private version that is only callable within itself.
(function myModule(){
myModule(); //calls itself
})();
Or a public version that can be called both inside and outside.
var myModule = (function(){
return function myMod(){
myMod();
}
})();
myModule();

Patrick Evans has the right reasons, but there is a neater way to solve it :)
(function triggerHeightRecalc() {
setTimeout(function() {
if(imagesLoaded()) {
adjustHeight();
} else {
triggerHeightRecalc();
}
}, 100);
})();
Here you are give an internal name to the (still) anonymous function. The name is only visible from within the function itself, its not visible in the global scope. Its called a Named function expression.