Picking and objects code is one of the most popular:
function Picking(event) {
var raycaster = new THREE.Raycaster();
event.preventDefault();
mouse.x = (event.clientX / renderer.domElement.clientWidth) * 2 - 1;
mouse.y = -(event.clientY / renderer.domElement.clientHeight) * 2 + 1;
raycaster.setFromCamera(mouse, camera);
var intersects = raycaster.intersectObjects(objects);
if (intersects.length > 0) {
if (INTERSECTED != intersects[0].object) {
}
} else {
INTERSECTED = null;
}
}
The description: in scene are two objects - cube and sphere. Sphere is first to camera and cube is second. The Sphere has ID1 and cube ID2. Picking is working.
The problem: after deleting the sphere (scene.remove(sphere)); Picking is giving the ID1, so, it seems like sphere is invisible. What is the problam?
The picture of the example: Picture
This code is not giving the result:
for (i = sphere.children.length - 1; i >= 0 ; i--) {
object = sphere.children[i];
object.geometry.remove;
object.material.remove;
object.geometry.dispose();
object.material.dispose();
scene.remove(object);
sphere.remove(object);
}
or
recur(sphere);
for (var i in objects) {
objects[i].geometry.remove;
objects[i].material.remove;
objects[i].geometry.dispose();
objects[i].material.dispose();
scene.remove(objects[i]);
sphere.remove(objects[i]);
}
function recur(obj) {
if (obj instanceof THREE.Mesh) {
objects.push(obj);
}
for (var i in obj.children) {
recur(obj.children[i]);
}
}
The code that add objects:
var ObjLoader = new THREE.ObjectLoader();
var ii;
var group = new THREE.Object3D();
var oldModel = scene.getObjectByName('group');
if (oldModel !== undefined) { scene.remove(oldModel); }
ObjLoader.load("path/model.json", addModelToScene);
group.name = "group";
scene.add(group);
function addModelToScene(model) {
recur(model);
for (var i in objects) {
objects[i].castShadow = true;
objects[i].receiveShadow = true;
}
model.name = "ModelName";
group.add(model)
}
So, The .json model consists of some objects (1..n);
This .json model is added into group.
With picking the side of the cube (may be material) is selectable, but not removable. but the position can be changed.
Thank you.
Change your picking logic a little, store all your objects into array when creating them:
/*var objects = [];
var group = new THREE.Object3D();
create your mesh add to array*/
objects.push(MyMesh);
/*now we have a reference all the time in objects[0] , objects[1]*/
objects[0].displose(); check syntax been a while*/
customMaterial = new THREE.ShaderMaterial(
{
uniforms: customUniforms,
vertexShader: document.getElementById( 'vertexShader' ).textContent,
fragmentShader: document.getElementById( 'fragmentShader' ).textContent,
//wireframe: true,
side: THREE.FrontSide
} );
function ground (){
var map = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(1024,1024, 128, 128);//Use planebufferGeo
map.dynamic = true;
_terrain = new THREE.Mesh( map, customMaterial );
_terrain.material.needsUpdate = true;
_terrain.geometry.dynamic = true;
_terrain.geometry.vertexColors = true;
_terrain.material.uvsNeedUpdate = true;
_terrain.geometry.normalsNeedUpdate = true;
_terrain.rotation.x = -Math.PI / 2;
objects.push(_terrain);
scene.add(_terrain );
}
So I used this in a situation where it was a picking game type, I used an array to store the mesh and i could manipulate the vertices / faces etc edit the array to make changes.
It was an easier way to compare things and check data.
function animate() {
var raycaster = new THREE.Raycaster();
raycaster.setFromCamera(mouse, camera);
var intersects = raycaster.intersectObjects(objects);
if ( intersects.length > 0 ) {
var faceIndex = intersects[0].faceIndex;
var obj = intersects[0].object;
var geom = obj.geometry;
//etc
Related
I have an object(LineA) that is composed of 4 children and sub-children. They are Meshes(MeshLineMaterial) and ArrowHelpers. Then I have another set of objects(Other Lines) of the same kind.
Sample object:
castShadow: false
children: Array(2)
0: ja {uuid: "B883597B-392D-41EB-A306-33A2F065A5B1", name: "PathA", type: "Mesh", parent: Hc, children: Array(0), …}
1: tb {uuid: "8B507A56-437C-47C5-9A0A-43DE9D8DE0D4", name: "", type: "Object3D", parent: Hc, children: Array(2), …}
length: 2
__proto__: Array(0)
frustumCulled: true
layers: Pf {mask: 1}
matrix: U {elements: Array(16)}
matrixAutoUpdate: true
matrixWorld: U {elements: Array(16)}
matrixWorldNeedsUpdate: false
nObjType: "Path"
name: "Path"
parent: wd {uuid: "20293B1F-868F-4A06-9A24-AF14738955A8", name: "", type: "Scene", parent: null, children: Array(121), …}
position: n {x: 0, y: 0, z: 0}
quaternion: ua {_x: 0, _y: 0, _z: 0, _w: 1,
_onChangeCallback: ƒ}
receiveShadow: false
renderOrder: 0
rotation: Qb {_x: 0, _y: 0, _z: 0,
_order: "XYZ",
_onChangeCallback: ƒ}
scale: n {x: 1, y: 1, z: 1}
selectable: true
type: "Group"
up: n {x: 0, y: 1, z: 0}
userData: {}
uuid: "CC27818D-5EEE-4A89-A39C-7F56C8C8F9BB"
visible: true
eulerOrder: (...)
id: 561
modelViewMatrix: U {elements: Array(16)}
normalMatrix: Y {elements: Array(9)}
useQuaternion: (...)
__proto__: B
I am trying to create a system where when I create LineA, it shouldn't collide/cross with Other Lines.
I have tried the bounding box and raycaster:
function collision()
{
var originPoint = LineA.position.clone();
var bb=new THREE.BoxHelper(LineA, 0x00ff00);
bb.geometry.computeBoundingBox();
var collidableMeshList = OtherLines;
for (var vertexIndex = 0; vertexIndex < bb.geometry.attributes.position.array.length; vertexIndex++)
{
var ray = new THREE.Raycaster( bb.position, bb.geometry.attributes.position.array[vertexIndex] );
var collisionResults = ray.intersectObjects( collidableMeshList );
if ( collisionResults.length > 0)
{
console.log("true");
hit = true;
}
}
}
I tried referring to this example
function detectCollisionCubes(bb, Line2bb){
bb.geometry.computeBoundingBox(); //not needed if its already calculated
Line2bb.geometry.computeBoundingBox();
bb.updateMatrixWorld();
Line2bb.updateMatrixWorld();
var box1 = bb.geometry.boundingBox.clone();
box1.applyMatrix4(bb.matrixWorld);
var box2 = Line2bb.geometry.boundingBox.clone();
box2.applyMatrix4(Line2bb.matrixWorld);
return box1.intersectsBox(box2);
}
None of them seems to be working in my case.
They show no error.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I'm attempting to display a list of renderer/scene/camera "groups" on the same html page. I ran into problems when trying to implement a render loop on all of them, using requestAnimationFrame. I am, however, unable to successfully render even a single frame by looping over the list.
calling renderer.render on each of the "groups" in the same function that I instantiate them in works fine. I refactored the code to allow calling render on each of the renderers outside of said function, and my blue spheres disappear;
I have some elements...
<div class="1"></div>
<div class="2"></div>
<div class="3"></div>
<div class="4"></div>
that I add some threeJs things to
$(document).ready(function(){
addResizeandCenterListener(window, $("#container"), 4/3);
addResizeListener($("#container"), $(".playerhalf"), 2/1);
for (let item of [".1", ".2", ".3", ".4", ".5", ".6", ".7", ".8"]) {
var threeDetails = addThreeRendererToElem($(item), item);
var scene = threeDetails["scene"];
addClickListenerToElem($(item), scene);
}
});
threeList = [];
//this adds a renderer/scene/camera to the element "elem"
function addThreeRendererToElem(elem, name){
var width = elem.innerWidth();
var height = elem.innerHeight();
var scene = newScene();
scene.name = name;
addDefaultLight(scene);
addBlueBall(scene);
var camera = addDefaultCamera(scene, width, height);
var renderer = newRenderer(width, height);
elem[0].appendChild(renderer.domElement);
//this works fine regardless of how many renderer/scene/camera groups I have placed in the DOM
//renderer.render(scene, camera);
var threeDict = {"renderer":renderer, "scene":scene, "camera":camera}
threeList.push(threeDict)
//this does not work, even if I only place a single renderer/scene camera group in the DOM
renderList();
}
function renderList() {
var tlist = threeList;
for (var i = 0; i< tlist;i++) {
var threeDict = tlist[i];
threeDict["renderer"].render(threeDict["scene"],
threeDict["camera"]);
}
}
function newScene(){
scene = new THREE.Scene();
return scene;
}
function newCamera(w, h){
camera = new THREE.PerspectiveCamera(45, w / h, 0.1, 100);
return camera;
}
function newRenderer(w, h){
renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({alpha:true, antialias:true});
renderer.setSize(w, h);
return renderer;
}
function addObjectToScene(obj, scene){
scene.add(obj);
}
function ballObj(color){
var ballGeometry = new THREE.SphereGeometry(3, 16, 16);
var ballMaterial = new THREE.MeshPhongMaterial({color: 0x33aaff});
var ball = new THREE.Mesh(ballGeometry, ballMaterial);
return ball;
}
function spotLightObj(){
var spot = new THREE.SpotLight(0xffffff);
return spot;
}
function addDefaultCamera(scene, width, height){
var camera = newCamera(width, height);
camera.position.set(1,1,20);
camera.lookAt(scene.position);
return camera;
}
function addDefaultLight(scene){
var spot = spotLightObj();
spot.position.set(1, 10, 4);
addObjectToScene(spot, scene);
}
function addBlueBall(scene){
var hexcolor = "0x33aaff";
bball = ballObj(hexcolor);
addObjectToScene(bball, scene);
}
I expect to see some blue spheres, like when I am calling render from inside addThreeRendererToElem, but I don't. Instead, the canvases are all blank. The canvases are in the correct places on the web page, inspecting threeList in the console shows that all the objects are indeed there. There are no error messages.
Incorrect ending condition on your for-loop inside the renderList function.
You are missing .length. Should be:
function renderList() {
var tlist = threeList;
for ( var i = 0; i < tlist.length; i++ ) {
var threeDict = tlist[i];
threeDict["renderer"].render( threeDict["scene"], threeDict["camera"] );
}
}
I have created a custom component in a-frame that creates a bespoke geometry. I am using the tick function to animate the update of the geometry's vertices. That is all working fine, however the shadow on the geometry does not update.
In my below example I toggle a flat shape between 2 states, folded and unfolded. When, for example it animates from folded to unfolded, the faces retain the shadow as though it were still folded.
Here is the HTML, please see <a-fold> in this example starting with the folded state (this can be changed to 'unfolded' by changing that attribute).
<html>
<head>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://aframe.io/releases/0.7.0/aframe.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<a-scene test>
<a-fold
state="folded"
color="blue"
position="-7.5 1 -20">
</a-fold>
<a-plane
position="0 0 -4"
rotation="-90 0 0"
width="20"
height="20"
color="#7BC8A4">
</a-plane>
<a-sky
color="#ECECEC">
</a-sky>
</a-scene>
</body>
</html>
and the javascript
//a trigger to test state change
AFRAME.registerComponent('test', {
init: function () {
setTimeout(function(){
var target = document.querySelector('a-fold');
target.setAttribute('changestate', true);
}, 2000);
}
});
//component
AFRAME.registerComponent('folder', {
schema: {
state: {type: 'string', default: 'unfolded'},
color: {type: 'color', default: '#000'},
changestate: {type: 'boolean', default: false},
changedur: {type: 'number', default: 400},
},
store: {
unfolded: [{"x":15,"y":0,"z":0},{"x":15,"y":15,"z":0},{"x":0,"y":15,"z":0},{"x":0,"y":0,"z":0},{"x":0,"y":15,"z":0},{"x":15,"y":0,"z":0},],
folded: [{"x":15,"y":0,"z":0},{"x":12,"y":12,"z":5},{"x":0,"y":15,"z":0},{"x":3,"y":3,"z":5},{"x":0,"y":15,"z":0},{"x":15,"y":0,"z":0},],
},
update: function () {
this.geometry = new THREE.Geometry();
var geometry = this.geometry
var verts = this.store[this.data.state]
$.each( verts, function( i, v3 ) {
geometry.vertices.push ( new THREE.Vector3(v3.x, v3.y, v3.z) );
});
geometry.faces.push(new THREE.Face3(0, 1, 2))
geometry.faces.push(new THREE.Face3(3, 4, 5))
geometry.computeBoundingBox();
geometry.computeFaceNormals();
geometry.computeVertexNormals();
this.material = new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial({color: this.data.color});
this.material.side = THREE.DoubleSide;
this.material.needsUpdate = true
this.mesh = new THREE.Mesh(this.geometry, this.material);
this.mesh.castShadow = true;
this.mesh.receiveShadow = true;
this.el.setObject3D('mesh', this.mesh);
},
tick: function (t, td) {
if (this.data.changestate === true){
var dur = this.data.changedur
var geom = this.el.getObject3D('mesh').geometry
var currVerts = geom.vertices
var toVerts = this.store[this.gotoState()]
var somethingChanged = false;
var allAxis = ["x", "y", "z"];
var thisParent = this
$.each( currVerts, function( i, vert) {
var curr = currVerts[i]
var to = toVerts[i]
$.each( allAxis, function( i, axis ) {
if (thisParent.approxEqual(curr[axis], to[axis])) {
somethingChanged = somethingChanged || false;
} else if (curr[axis] < to[axis]) {
var step = thisParent.stepCalc(curr[axis], to[axis], dur, td)
curr[axis] += step;
somethingChanged = true;
} else {
var step = thisParent.stepCalc(curr[axis], to[axis], dur, td)
curr[axis] -= step;
somethingChanged = true;
}
});
});
geom.verticesNeedUpdate = somethingChanged;
}
},
gotoState: function (){
var to = ""
var current = this.data.state
var states = Object.keys(this.store)
$.each( states, function( i, state) {
if ( state != current ){
to = state
}
});
return to;
},
approxEqual: function (x, y) {
return Math.abs(x - y) < 0.00001;
},
stepCalc: function (curr, to, dur, delta){
var distance = Math.abs(curr - to)
var speed = distance/dur
var step = speed*delta
return step;
},
remove: function () {
this.el.removeObject3D('mesh');
}
});
//primitive
AFRAME.registerPrimitive('a-fold', {
defaultComponents: {
folder: {}
},
mappings: {
state: 'folder.state',
color: 'folder.color',
changestate: 'folder.changestate',
changedur: 'folder.changedur'
}
});
Sorry, I know its a lot but I don't want to simplify it in case I lose the problem. As you can see in the component I have tried to add this.material.needsUpdate = true as well as adding this.mesh.castShadow = true and this.mesh.receiveShadow = true but it does not make a difference.
On a side note, if I do an animation of the whole entity (ie a rotation) I can see the material reflecting the light so the material does respond to lighting dynamically, just not when I change the shape by updating the vertices.
Here are 2 images that demonstrate what I mean.
You can see that in 2nd image, although the plane is flat, its shadows suggest it has a fold. And it does the same the other way around (ie if it starts unfolded, the shadow is correct and that persists when it folds).
Here is a js fiddle
Any more info needed, please ask. Any help is much appreciated as ever.
Lighting is calculated using normal vectors, in your case you're moving the mesh vertices but leaving the normal vectors, which is why the lighting doesn't change. You need to add geometry.computeVertexNormals(); in your tick function after you've altered the vertices.
In 3D shadows are different to shading or lighting, the problem you're having is related to lighting but not shadows. Which is why adjusting the mesh.castShadow properties didn't behave like you expected.
I would like to be able to overlay a html iframe on top of an augmented reality marker, however I cannot get the CSS3DRenderer to show the same result as the WebGLRenderer and I'm not sure where I'm going wrong.
The WebGL renders perfectly, with the mesh following the marker and it's all magic, the CSS3DRenderer however centers the iframe in the middle of the video, inversed and unscaled, and it rotates in the opposite direction.
Thanks to three.js and artoolkit, here is some test code using video input and both renderers.
new Promise(function(resolve,reject) {
var source = document.createElement('video');
source.autoplay = true;
source.playsinline = true;
source.controls = false;
source.loop = true;
source.onplay = function(event) {
resolve(source);
}
source.src = 'data/output_4.ogg';
document.body.appendChild(source);
}).then(function(source) {
var scene = new THREE.Scene();
var camera = new THREE.Camera();
camera.matrixAutoUpdate = false;
scene.add(camera);
var material = new THREE.MeshNormalMaterial({
transparent : true,
opacity : 0.5,
side : THREE.DoubleSide
});
var geometry = new THREE.PlaneGeometry(1,1);
var mesh = new THREE.Mesh(geometry,material);
// mesh.matrixAutoUpdate = false;
scene.add(mesh);
var renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({
antialias : true,
alpha : true
});
renderer.setSize(source.videoWidth,source.videoHeight);
renderer.setClearColor(new THREE.Color('lightgrey'),0);
document.body.appendChild(renderer.domElement);
/*\
cssRenderer
\*/
var cssRenderer = new THREE.CSS3DRenderer();
cssRenderer.setSize(source.videoWidth,source.videoHeight);
var cssScene = new THREE.Scene();
var iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
iframe.src = "/data/index.html";
iframe.style.background = "rgb(0,0,0)";
var iframe3D = new THREE.CSS3DObject(iframe);
// iframe3D.matrixAutoUpdate = false;
cssScene.add(iframe3D);
document.body.appendChild(cssRenderer.domElement);
/*\
arController
\*/
var cameraParameters = new ARCameraParam();
var arController = null;
cameraParameters.onload = function() {
arController = new ARController(source.videoWidth,source.videoHeight,cameraParameters);
arController.addEventListener("getMarker",function(event) {
var modelViewMatrix = new THREE.Matrix4().fromArray(event.data.matrix);
camera.matrix.getInverse(modelViewMatrix);
// mesh.matrix.copy(modelViewMatrix);
// iframe3D.matrix.copy(modelViewMatrix);
});
var cameraViewMatrix = new THREE.Matrix4().fromArray(arController.getCameraMatrix());
camera.projectionMatrix.copy(cameraViewMatrix);
}
cameraParameters.load("data/camera_para.dat");
/*\
animate
\*/
requestAnimationFrame(function animate() {
requestAnimationFrame(animate);
if (!arController) {
return;
}
arController.process(source);
renderer.render(scene,camera);
cssRenderer.render(cssScene,camera);
});
});
I had hoped that rotating the camera instead of the object would provide a solution, alas. It's as if I was missing out some matrix transformation that needs to be applied.
Perhaps there was something with the fov parameters of the camera, or maybe the transform matrix was getting overwritten, but anyway I couldn't locate the problem. So here's an alternative that doesn't use CSS3DRenderer, or THREE.js.
Essentially we can use the coordinates from the marker data itself to create a projection matrix. Many, many thanks to this post which provided most of the code I needed.
function adjugate(m) { // Compute the adjugate of m
return [
m[4]*m[8]-m[7]*m[5],m[7]*m[2]-m[1]*m[8],m[1]*m[5]-m[4]*m[2],
m[6]*m[5]-m[3]*m[8],m[0]*m[8]-m[6]*m[2],m[3]*m[2]-m[0]*m[5],
m[3]*m[7]-m[6]*m[4],m[6]*m[1]-m[0]*m[7],m[0]*m[4]-m[3]*m[1]
];
}
function multiply(a,b) { // multiply two matrices
a = [
a[0],a[3],a[6],
a[1],a[4],a[7],
a[2],a[5],a[8]
];
b = [
b[0],b[3],b[6],
b[1],b[4],b[7],
b[2],b[5],b[8]
];
var m = Array(9);
for (var i = 0; i != 3; ++i) {
for (var j = 0; j != 3; ++j) {
var mij = 0;
for (var k = 0; k != 3; ++k) {
mij += a[3*i + k]*b[3*k + j];
}
m[3*i + j] = mij;
}
}
return [
m[0],m[3],m[6],
m[1],m[4],m[7],
m[2],m[5],m[8]
];
}
function apply(m,v) { // multiply matrix and vector
return [
m[0]*v[0] + m[3]*v[1] + m[6]*v[2],
m[1]*v[0] + m[4]*v[1] + m[7]*v[2],
m[2]*v[0] + m[5]*v[1] + m[8]*v[2]
];
}
//
var iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
iframe.src = "data/index.html";
iframe.style.position = "absolute";
iframe.style.left = "0";
iframe.style.top = "0";
iframe.style.transformOrigin = "0 0";
document.querySelector("main").appendChild(iframe);
var s = [
0,0,1,
iframe.offsetWidth,0,1,
0,iframe.offsetHeight,1
];
var v = apply(adjugate(s),[iframe.offsetWidth,iframe.offsetHeight,1]);
s = multiply(s,[
v[0], 0, 0,
0, v[1], 0,
0, 0, v[2]
]);
arController.addEventListener("getMarker",function(event) {
if (event.data.marker.id === marker) {
var d = [
event.data.marker.vertex[(4 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][0],event.data.marker.vertex[(4 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][1],1,
event.data.marker.vertex[(5 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][0],event.data.marker.vertex[(5 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][1],1,
event.data.marker.vertex[(7 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][0],event.data.marker.vertex[(7 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][1],1
];
var v = apply(adjugate(d),[event.data.marker.vertex[(6 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][0],event.data.marker.vertex[(6 - event.data.marker.dir) % 4][1],1]);
d = multiply(d,[
v[0],0,0,
0,v[1],0,
0,0,v[2]
]);
var t = multiply(d,adjugate(s));
for (i = 0; i < 9; ++i) {
t[i] = t[i] / t[8];
t[i] = Math.abs(t[i]) < Number.EPSILON ? 0 : t[i];
}
t = [
t[0],t[1],0,t[2],
t[3],t[4],0,t[5],
0,0,1,0,
t[6],t[7],0,t[8]
];
iframe.style.transform = "matrix3d(" + t.join(", ") + ")";
} else {
// mesh.visible = false;
}
});
Might be an answer 4 years overdue, but it might be useful for somebody.
I've created an alternative solution.
You can check it here: https://github.com/jonathanneels/QrA
In essence;
QrA uses tilt-js to simulate 3D-effects (parallax) and AR.js a-box as the startobject.
The iframe gets pushed by the tilt.js functions and the AR cube's .position, .scale and .rotation is used as reference.
Enjoy!
I'm using Three.js on an app, currently I'm having issues with the object picking. Some objects are not getting intersected by the rays, but only on certain camera rotations. I'm trying to debug the code and to draw the ray.
I'm using this methods in my code(canvas is a namespace for the Three objects):
C.getXY = function(e) {
var click = {};
click.x = ( e.clientX / window.innerWidth ) * 2 - 1;
click.y = - ( e.clientY / window.innerHeight ) * 2 + 1;
return click;
};
C.doPicking = function(e) {
var picked = false;
if (canvas.boundingBox !== null) {
canvas.scene.remove(canvas.boundingBox);
}
var projector = new THREE.Projector(), click = C.getXY(e);
var ray = projector.pickingRay(new THREE.Vector3(click.x, click.y, 0), canvas.camera);
ray.linePrecision = 0.00000000000000001;
ray.precision = 0.00000000000000001;
var intersects = ray.intersectObjects(canvas.scene.children);
if (intersects.length > 0) {
var i = 0;
var ids = [];
while (i < intersects.length) {
if (intersects[i].object.visible) {
//Object is picked
}
++i;
}
}
};
My question is...are other points to consider in the debuging process?
Ooops...forgot to add mesh.geometry.computeFaceNormals(); before adding the meshes to the scene. Now the picking is working normally.