Develop Reference

How to convert an integer N to an array of Size N in Javascript? [duplicate]

I'm looking for any alternatives to the below for creating a JavaScript array containing 1 through to N where N is only known at runtime.
var foo = [];
for (var i = 1; i <= N; i++) {
foo.push(i);
}
To me it feels like there should be a way of doing this without the loop.

In ES6 using Array from() and keys() methods.
Array.from(Array(10).keys())
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Shorter version using spread operator.
[...Array(10).keys()]
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Start from 1 by passing map function to Array from(), with an object with a length property:
Array.from({length: 10}, (_, i) => i + 1)
//=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

You can do so:
var N = 10;
Array.apply(null, {length: N}).map(Number.call, Number)
result: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
or with random values:
Array.apply(null, {length: N}).map(Function.call, Math.random)
result: [0.7082694901619107, 0.9572225909214467, 0.8586748542729765,
0.8653848143294454, 0.008339877473190427, 0.9911756622605026, 0.8133423360995948, 0.8377588465809822, 0.5577575915958732, 0.16363654541783035]
Explanation
First, note that Number.call(undefined, N) is equivalent to Number(N), which just returns N. We'll use that fact later.
Array.apply(null, [undefined, undefined, undefined]) is equivalent to Array(undefined, undefined, undefined), which produces a three-element array and assigns undefined to each element.
How can you generalize that to N elements? Consider how Array() works, which goes something like this:
function Array() {
if ( arguments.length == 1 &&
'number' === typeof arguments[0] &&
arguments[0] >= 0 && arguments &&
arguments[0] < 1 << 32 ) {
return [ … ]; // array of length arguments[0], generated by native code
}
var a = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
a.push(arguments[i]);
}
return a;
}
Since ECMAScript 5, Function.prototype.apply(thisArg, argsArray) also accepts a duck-typed array-like object as its second parameter. If we invoke Array.apply(null, { length: N }), then it will execute
function Array() {
var a = [];
for (var i = 0; i < /* arguments.length = */ N; i++) {
a.push(/* arguments[i] = */ undefined);
}
return a;
}
Now we have an N-element array, with each element set to undefined. When we call .map(callback, thisArg) on it, each element will be set to the result of callback.call(thisArg, element, index, array). Therefore, [undefined, undefined, …, undefined].map(Number.call, Number) would map each element to (Number.call).call(Number, undefined, index, array), which is the same as Number.call(undefined, index, array), which, as we observed earlier, evaluates to index. That completes the array whose elements are the same as their index.
Why go through the trouble of Array.apply(null, {length: N}) instead of just Array(N)? After all, both expressions would result an an N-element array of undefined elements. The difference is that in the former expression, each element is explicitly set to undefined, whereas in the latter, each element was never set. According to the documentation of .map():
callback is invoked only for indexes of the array which have assigned values; it is not invoked for indexes which have been deleted or which have never been assigned values.
Therefore, Array(N) is insufficient; Array(N).map(Number.call, Number) would result in an uninitialized array of length N.
Compatibility
Since this technique relies on behaviour of Function.prototype.apply() specified in ECMAScript 5, it will not work in pre-ECMAScript 5 browsers such as Chrome 14 and Internet Explorer 9.

Multiple ways using ES6
Using spread operator (...) and keys method
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map( i => i+1);
Fill/Map
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1);
Array.from
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1)
Array.from and { length: N } hack
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
Note about generalised form
All the forms above can produce arrays initialised to pretty much any desired values by changing i+1 to expression required (e.g. i*2, -i, 1+i*2, i%2 and etc). If expression can be expressed by some function f then the first form becomes simply
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f)
Examples:
Array.from({length: 5}, (v, k) => k+1);
// [1,2,3,4,5]
Since the array is initialized with undefined on each position, the value of v will be undefined
Example showcasing all the forms
let demo= (N) => {
console.log(
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(( i) => i+1),
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1) ,
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1),
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
)
}
demo(5)
More generic example with custom initialiser function f i.e.
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map((i) => f(i))
or even simpler
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f)
let demo= (N,f) => {
console.log(
[ ...Array(N).keys() ].map(f),
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => f(i)) ,
Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => f(i)),
Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => f(i))
)
}
demo(5, i=>2*i+1)

If I get what you are after, you want an array of numbers 1..n that you can later loop through.
If this is all you need, can you do this instead?
var foo = new Array(45); // create an empty array with length 45
then when you want to use it... (un-optimized, just for example)
for(var i = 0; i < foo.length; i++){
document.write('Item: ' + (i + 1) + ' of ' + foo.length + '<br/>');
}
e.g. if you don't need to store anything in the array, you just need a container of the right length that you can iterate over... this might be easier.
See it in action here: http://jsfiddle.net/3kcvm/

Arrays innately manage their lengths. As they are traversed, their indexes can be held in memory and referenced at that point. If a random index needs to be known, the indexOf method can be used.
This said, for your needs you may just want to declare an array of a certain size:
var foo = new Array(N); // where N is a positive integer
/* this will create an array of size, N, primarily for memory allocation,
but does not create any defined values
foo.length // size of Array
foo[ Math.floor(foo.length/2) ] = 'value' // places value in the middle of the array
*/
ES6
Spread
Making use of the spread operator (...) and keys method, enables you to create a temporary array of size N to produce the indexes, and then a new array that can be assigned to your variable:
var foo = [ ...Array(N).keys() ];
Fill/Map
You can first create the size of the array you need, fill it with undefined and then create a new array using map, which sets each element to the index.
var foo = Array(N).fill().map((v,i)=>i);
Array.from
This should be initializing to length of size N and populating the array in one pass.
Array.from({ length: N }, (v, i) => i)
In lieu of the comments and confusion, if you really wanted to capture the values from 1..N in the above examples, there are a couple options:
if the index is available, you can simply increment it by one (e.g., ++i).
in cases where index is not used -- and possibly a more efficient way -- is to create your array but make N represent N+1, then shift off the front.
So if you desire 100 numbers:
let arr; (arr=[ ...Array(101).keys() ]).shift()

In ES6 you can do:
Array(N).fill().map((e,i)=>i+1);
http://jsbin.com/molabiluwa/edit?js,console
Edit:
Changed Array(45) to Array(N) since you've updated the question.
console.log(
Array(45).fill(0).map((e,i)=>i+1)
);

Use the very popular Underscore _.range method
// _.range([start], stop, [step])
_.range(10); // => [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
_.range(1, 11); // => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
_.range(0, 30, 5); // => [0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
_.range(0, -10, -1); // => [0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9]
_.range(0); // => []

function range(start, end) {
var foo = [];
for (var i = start; i <= end; i++) {
foo.push(i);
}
return foo;
}
Then called by
var foo = range(1, 5);
There is no built-in way to do this in Javascript, but it's a perfectly valid utility function to create if you need to do it more than once.
Edit: In my opinion, the following is a better range function. Maybe just because I'm biased by LINQ, but I think it's more useful in more cases. Your mileage may vary.
function range(start, count) {
if(arguments.length == 1) {
count = start;
start = 0;
}
var foo = [];
for (var i = 0; i < count; i++) {
foo.push(start + i);
}
return foo;
}

the fastest way to fill an Array in v8 is:
[...Array(5)].map((_,i) => i);
result will be: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

Performance
Today 2020.12.11 I performed tests on macOS HighSierra 10.13.6 on Chrome v87, Safari v13.1.2 and Firefox v83 for chosen solutions.
Results
For all browsers
solution O (based on while) is the fastest (except Firefox for big N - but it's fast there)
solution T is fastest on Firefox for big N
solutions M,P is fast for small N
solution V (lodash) is fast for big N
solution W,X are slow for small N
solution F is slow
Details
I perform 2 tests cases:
for small N = 10 - you can run it HERE
for big N = 1000000 - you can run it HERE
Below snippet presents all tested solutions A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
function A(N) {
return Array.from({length: N}, (_, i) => i + 1)
}
function B(N) {
return Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i+1);
}
function C(N) {
return Array(N).join().split(',').map((_, i) => i+1 );
}
function D(N) {
return Array.from(Array(N), (_, i) => i+1)
}
function E(N) {
return Array.from({ length: N }, (_, i) => i+1)
}
function F(N) {
return Array.from({length:N}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
}
function G(N) {
return (Array(N)+'').split(',').map((_,i)=> i+1)
}
function H(N) {
return [ ...Array(N).keys() ].map( i => i+1);
}
function I(N) {
return [...Array(N).keys()].map(x => x + 1);
}
function J(N) {
return [...Array(N+1).keys()].slice(1)
}
function K(N) {
return [...Array(N).keys()].map(x => ++x);
}
function L(N) {
let arr; (arr=[ ...Array(N+1).keys() ]).shift();
return arr;
}
function M(N) {
var arr = [];
var i = 0;
while (N--) arr.push(++i);
return arr;
}
function N(N) {
var a=[],b=N;while(b--)a[b]=b+1;
return a;
}
function O(N) {
var a=Array(N),b=0;
while(b<N) a[b++]=b;
return a;
}
function P(N) {
var foo = [];
for (var i = 1; i <= N; i++) foo.push(i);
return foo;
}
function Q(N) {
for(var a=[],b=N;b--;a[b]=b+1);
return a;
}
function R(N) {
for(var i,a=[i=0];i<N;a[i++]=i);
return a;
}
function S(N) {
let foo,x;
for(foo=[x=N]; x; foo[x-1]=x--);
return foo;
}
function T(N) {
return new Uint8Array(N).map((item, i) => i + 1);
}
function U(N) {
return '_'.repeat(5).split('').map((_, i) => i + 1);
}
function V(N) {
return _.range(1, N+1);
}
function W(N) {
return [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i<N)yield ++i})()]
}
function X(N) {
function sequence(max, step = 1) {
return {
[Symbol.iterator]: function* () {
for (let i = 1; i <= max; i += step) yield i
}
}
}
return [...sequence(N)];
}
[A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R,S,T,U,V,W,X].forEach(f=> {
console.log(`${f.name} ${f(5)}`);
})
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.20/lodash.min.js" integrity="sha512-90vH1Z83AJY9DmlWa8WkjkV79yfS2n2Oxhsi2dZbIv0nC4E6m5AbH8Nh156kkM7JePmqD6tcZsfad1ueoaovww==" crossorigin="anonymous"> </script>
This snippet only presents functions used in performance tests - it does not perform tests itself!
And here are example results for chrome

This question has a lot of complicated answers, but a simple one-liner:
[...Array(255).keys()].map(x => x + 1)
Also, although the above is short (and neat) to write, I think the following is a bit faster
(for a max length of:
127, Int8,
255, Uint8,
32,767, Int16,
65,535, Uint16,
2,147,483,647, Int32,
4,294,967,295, Uint32.
(based on the max integer values), also here's more on Typed Arrays):
(new Uint8Array(255)).map(($,i) => i + 1);
Although this solution is also not so ideal, because it creates two arrays, and uses the extra variable declaration "$" (not sure any way to get around that using this method). I think the following solution is the absolute fastest possible way to do this:
for(var i = 0, arr = new Uint8Array(255); i < arr.length; i++) arr[i] = i + 1;
Anytime after this statement is made, you can simple use the variable "arr" in the current scope;
If you want to make a simple function out of it (with some basic verification):
function range(min, max) {
min = min && min.constructor == Number ? min : 0;
!(max && max.constructor == Number && max > min) && // boolean statements can also be used with void return types, like a one-line if statement.
((max = min) & (min = 0)); //if there is a "max" argument specified, then first check if its a number and if its graeter than min: if so, stay the same; if not, then consider it as if there is no "max" in the first place, and "max" becomes "min" (and min becomes 0 by default)
for(var i = 0, arr = new (
max < 128 ? Int8Array :
max < 256 ? Uint8Array :
max < 32768 ? Int16Array :
max < 65536 ? Uint16Array :
max < 2147483648 ? Int32Array :
max < 4294967296 ? Uint32Array :
Array
)(max - min); i < arr.length; i++) arr[i] = i + min;
return arr;
}
//and you can loop through it easily using array methods if you want
range(1,11).forEach(x => console.log(x));
//or if you're used to pythons `for...in` you can do a similar thing with `for...of` if you want the individual values:
for(i of range(2020,2025)) console.log(i);
//or if you really want to use `for..in`, you can, but then you will only be accessing the keys:
for(k in range(25,30)) console.log(k);
console.log(
range(1,128).constructor.name,
range(200).constructor.name,
range(400,900).constructor.name,
range(33333).constructor.name,
range(823, 100000).constructor.name,
range(10,4) // when the "min" argument is greater than the "max", then it just considers it as if there is no "max", and the new max becomes "min", and "min" becomes 0, as if "max" was never even written
);
so, with the above function, the above super-slow "simple one-liner" becomes the super-fast, even-shorter:
range(1,14000);

Using ES2015/ES6 spread operator
[...Array(10)].map((_, i) => i + 1)
console.log([...Array(10)].map((_, i) => i + 1))

You can use this:
new Array(/*any number which you want*/)
.join().split(',')
.map(function(item, index){ return ++index;})
for example
new Array(10)
.join().split(',')
.map(function(item, index){ return ++index;})
will create following array:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

If you happen to be using d3.js in your app as I am, D3 provides a helper function that does this for you.
So to get an array from 0 to 4, it's as easy as:
d3.range(5)
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
and to get an array from 1 to 5, as you were requesting:
d3.range(1, 5+1)
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Check out this tutorial for more info.

This is probably the fastest way to generate an array of numbers
Shortest
var a=[],b=N;while(b--)a[b]=b+1;
Inline
var arr=(function(a,b){while(a--)b[a]=a;return b})(10,[]);
//arr=[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
If you want to start from 1
var arr=(function(a,b){while(a--)b[a]=a+1;return b})(10,[]);
//arr=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
Want a function?
function range(a,b,c){c=[];while(a--)c[a]=a+b;return c}; //length,start,placeholder
var arr=range(10,5);
//arr=[5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
WHY?
while is the fastest loop
Direct setting is faster than push
[] is faster than new Array(10)
it's short... look the first code. then look at all other functions in here.
If you like can't live without for
for(var a=[],b=7;b>0;a[--b]=b+1); //a=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
or
for(var a=[],b=7;b--;a[b]=b+1); //a=[1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

If you are using lodash, you can use _.range:
_.range([start=0], end, [step=1])
Creates an array of numbers
(positive and/or negative) progressing from start up to, but not
including, end. A step of -1 is used if a negative start is specified
without an end or step. If end is not specified, it's set to start
with start then set to 0.
Examples:
_.range(4);
// ➜ [0, 1, 2, 3]
_.range(-4);
// ➜ [0, -1, -2, -3]
_.range(1, 5);
// ➜ [1, 2, 3, 4]
_.range(0, 20, 5);
// ➜ [0, 5, 10, 15]
_.range(0, -4, -1);
// ➜ [0, -1, -2, -3]
_.range(1, 4, 0);
// ➜ [1, 1, 1]
_.range(0);
// ➜ []

the new way to filling Array is:
const array = [...Array(5).keys()]
console.log(array)
result will be: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]

with ES6 you can do:
// `n` is the size you want to initialize your array
// `null` is what the array will be filled with (can be any other value)
Array(n).fill(null)

Very simple and easy to generate exactly 1 - N
const [, ...result] = Array(11).keys();
console.log('Result:', result);

Final Summary report .. Drrruummm Rolll -
This is the shortest code to generate an Array of size N (here 10) without using ES6. Cocco's version above is close but not the shortest.
(function(n){for(a=[];n--;a[n]=n+1);return a})(10)
But the undisputed winner of this Code golf(competition to solve a particular problem in the fewest bytes of source code) is Niko Ruotsalainen . Using Array Constructor and ES6 spread operator . (Most of the ES6 syntax is valid typeScript, but following is not. So be judicious while using it)
[...Array(10).keys()]

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49577331/8784402
With Delta
For javascript
smallest and one-liner
[...Array(N)].map((v, i) => from + i * step);
Examples and other alternatives
Array.from(Array(10).keys()).map(i => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
[...Array(10).keys()].map(i => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Array(10).fill(0).map((v, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array(10).fill().map((v, i) => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
[...Array(10)].map((v, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Range Function
const range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
range(0, 9, 2);
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
// can also assign range function as static method in Array class (but not recommended )
Array.range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Array.range(2, 10, 2);
//=> [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
Array.range(0, 10, 1);
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Array.range(2, 10, -1);
//=> []
Array.range(3, 0, -1);
//=> [3, 2, 1, 0]
As Iterators
class Range {
constructor(total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
}
}
[...new Range(5)]; // Five Elements
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
[...new Range(5, 2)]; // Five Elements With Step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
[...new Range(5, -2, 10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From 10
//=>[10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
[...new Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of new Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
As Generators Only
const Range = function* (total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
Array.from(Range(5, -2, -10));
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
[...Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
// Lazy loaded way
const number0toInf = Range(Infinity);
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 0
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 1
// ...
From-To with steps/delta
using iterators
class Range2 {
constructor(to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
}
}
[...new Range2(5)]; // First 5 Whole Numbers
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
[...new Range2(5, 2)]; // From 0 to 5 with step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4]
[...new Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
using Generators
const Range2 = function* (to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
[...Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
let even4to10 = Range2(10, 2, 4);
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 4
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 6
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 8
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 10
even4to10.next().value;
//=> undefined
For Typescript
class _Array<T> extends Array<T> {
static range(from: number, to: number, step: number): number[] {
return Array.from(Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)).map(
(v, k) => from + k * step
);
}
}
_Array.range(0, 9, 1);

Solution for empty array and with just number in array
const arrayOne = new Array(10);
console.log(arrayOne);
const arrayTwo = [...Array(10).keys()];
console.log(arrayTwo);
var arrayThree = Array.from(Array(10).keys());
console.log(arrayThree);
const arrayStartWithOne = Array.from(Array(10).keys(), item => item + 1);
console.log(arrayStartWithOne)

✅ Simply, this worked for me:
[...Array(5)].map(...)

There is another way in ES6, using Array.from which takes 2 arguments, the first is an arrayLike (in this case an object with length property), and the second is a mapping function (in this case we map the item to its index)
Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i)
this is shorter and can be used for other sequences like generating even numbers
Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i*2)
Also this has better performance than most other ways because it only loops once through the array.
Check the snippit for some comparisons
// open the dev console to see results
count = 100000
console.time("from object")
for (let i = 0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.from({length:10}, (v,i) => i )
}
console.timeEnd("from object")
console.time("from keys")
for (let i =0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.from(Array(10).keys())
}
console.timeEnd("from keys")
console.time("apply")
for (let i = 0; i<count; i++) {
range = Array.apply(null, { length: 10 }).map(function(element, index) { return index; })
}
console.timeEnd("apply")

Fast
This solution is probably fastest it is inspired by lodash _.range function (but my is simpler and faster)
let N=10, i=0, a=Array(N);
while(i<N) a[i++]=i;
console.log(a);
Performance advantages over current (2020.12.11) existing answers based on while/for
memory is allocated once at the beginning by a=Array(N)
increasing index i++ is used - which looks is about 30% faster than decreasing index i-- (probably because CPU cache memory faster in forward direction)
Speed tests with more than 20 other solutions was conducted in this answer

Using new Array methods and => function syntax from ES6 standard (only Firefox at the time of writing).
By filling holes with undefined:
Array(N).fill().map((_, i) => i + 1);
Array.from turns "holes" into undefined so Array.map works as expected:
Array.from(Array(5)).map((_, i) => i + 1)

In ES6:
Array.from({length: 1000}, (_, i) => i).slice(1);
or better yet (without the extra variable _ and without the extra slice call):
Array.from({length:1000}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
Or for slightly faster results, you can use Uint8Array, if your list is shorter than 256 results (or you can use the other Uint lists depending on how short the list is, like Uint16 for a max number of 65535, or Uint32 for a max of 4294967295 etc. Officially, these typed arrays were only added in ES6 though). For example:
Uint8Array.from({length:10}, Number.call, i => i + 1)
ES5:
Array.apply(0, {length: 1000}).map(function(){return arguments[1]+1});
Alternatively, in ES5, for the map function (like second parameter to the Array.from function in ES6 above), you can use Number.call
Array.apply(0,{length:1000}).map(Number.call,Number).slice(1)
Or, if you're against the .slice here also, you can do the ES5 equivalent of the above (from ES6), like:
Array.apply(0,{length:1000}).map(Number.call, Function("i","return i+1"))

Array(...Array(9)).map((_, i) => i);
console.log(Array(...Array(9)).map((_, i) => i))

for(var i,a=[i=0];i<10;a[i++]=i);
a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

It seems the only flavor not currently in this rather complete list of answers is one featuring a generator; so to remedy that:
const gen = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i<N)yield i++})()]
which can be used thus:
gen(4) // [0,1,2,3]
The nice thing about this is you don't just have to increment... To take inspiration from the answer #igor-shubin gave, you could create an array of randoms very easily:
const gen = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;
while(i++<N) yield Math.random()
})()]
And rather than something lengthy operationally expensive like:
const slow = N => new Array(N).join().split(',').map((e,i)=>i*5)
// [0,5,10,15,...]
you could instead do:
const fast = N => [...(function*(){let i=0;while(i++<N)yield i*5})()]

Find the smallest missing positive int in array in js

How do I find the smallest missing positive integer from an array of integers in js? I didn't find an answer to my question, all I found was in other languages.
Here's an example array:
[-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2]
The result should be 8.

You could take an object of seen values and a min variable for keeping track of the next minimum value.
const
data = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2],
ref = {};
let min = 1;
for (const value of data) {
if (value < min) continue;
ref[value] = true;
while (ref[min]) min++;
}
console.log(min);

You could create an array of positive integer (in this example integers has values from 0 to 10), then use Math.min on integers array filtered with initial array (that was filtered taking only positive numbers):
let integers = Array.from(Array(11).keys());
let arr = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2];
console.log(Math.min(...integers.filter(x => x > 0 && !arr.filter(x => x > 0).includes(x))));

You can do like below to avoid multiple loops.
Simplest solution is when numbers from 1-10, sum of all number will 55 using this formula (n * (n + 1)) / 2;.
the missing number will be 55-(sum of remaining numbers).
const list = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2];
const missing = (list) => {
let sum = 0;
let max = 0;
let ref = {};
for (let i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
const ele = list[i];
if (ele > 0 && !ref[ele]) {
ref[ele] = true;
max = max < ele ? ele : max;
sum += ele;
}
}
const total = (max * (max + 1)) / 2;
return total - sum; // will work if only one missing number
// if multiple missing numbers and find smallest one
// let result = 0;
// for (let i = 1; i <= total - sum; i++) {
// if (!ref[i]) {
// result = i;
// break;
// }
// }
// return result;
};
console.log(missing(list));

I create function for finding the smallest positive.
arr = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2]
function getSmallestPos(arr) {
pi = [...new Set(
arr.filter(n => n > 0)
.sort((a, b) => a - b ))
];
for (i = 0; i < pi.length; i++) {
if ( pi[i] != (i+1)) {
return (i+1);
}
}
}
console.log(getSmallestPos(arr));

Your questions title contradicts the body of your answer.
To get the smallest positive integer you might try this:
const array = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2];
// filter array to get just positive values and return the minimum value
const min = Math.min(...array.filter(a => Math.sign(a) !== -1));
console.log(min);
For getting the missing value check this out:
const array = [-2, 6, 4, 5, 7, -1, 1, 3, 6, -2, 9, 10, 2, 2];
const getMissingPositiveInt = (array) => {
// filter array to get just positive values and sort from min to max (0, 1, 4, 5 ...)
const min = array.filter(a => Math.sign(a) !== -1).sort((a,b) => a-b);
for (let i=min[0]; i<array.length; i++) // loop from min over whole array
if (!min.includes(i)) // if array doesnt include index ...
return i; // ... you got your missing value and can return it
}
console.log(getMissingPositiveInt(array));

latest elements in array not found? codewars kata

I'm solving the following kata:
Given an input of an array of digits, return the array with each digit incremented by its position in the array: the first digit will be incremented by 1, the second digit by 2, etc. Make sure to start counting your positions from 1 (and not 0).
Your result can only contain single digit numbers, so if adding a digit with it's position gives you a multiple-digit number, only the last digit of the number should be returned.
Notes:
return an empty array if your array is empty
arrays will only contain numbers so don't worry about checking that
Examples
[1, 2, 3] --> [2, 4, 6] # [1+1, 2+2, 3+3]
[4, 6, 9, 1, 3] --> [5, 8, 2, 5, 8] # [4+1, 6+2, 9+3, 1+4, 3+5]
# 9+3 = 12 --> 2
My code:
const incrementer = (arr) => {
if (arr === []) {
return []
}
let newArr = []
for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++) {
let result = arr[i] + (i + 1)
newArr.push(result)
if (newArr[i] > 9 ) {
let singleDigit = Number(newArr[i].toString().split('')[1])
newArr.push(singleDigit)
}
}
const filteredArr = newArr.filter(el => el >= 0 && el <= 9)
return filteredArr
}
I can't seem to pass the latest test case, which is the following:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8]), [2, 4, 6, 8, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 2]
I keep getting back the whole correct array up until the second 0, after which the other numbers, 1,2,2 are missing from the solution. What am I doing wrong?

The problem in your code is that the filter only runs at the end, and so when you have done a double push in one iteration (once with the value that has more than one digit, and once with just the last digit), the next iteration will no longer have a correct index for the next value that is being pushed: newArr[i] will not be that value.
It is better to correct the value to one digit before pushing it to your new array.
Moreover, you can make better use of the power of JavaScript:
It has a nice map method for arrays, which is ideal for this purpose
Use modulo arithmetic to get the last digit without having to create a string first
Here is the proposed function:
const incrementer = (arr) => arr.map((val, i) => (val + i + 1) % 10);
console.log(incrementer([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8]));

... so if adding a digit with it's position gives you a multiple-digit number, only the last digit of the number should be returned.
So if the number is 12, it expects only 2 to be added to the array.
So your code should be:
if (newArr[i] > 9)
{
newArr[i] = newArr[i] % 10; // remainder of newArr[i] / 10
}
const incrementer = (arr) => {
if (arr.length === 0) { // CHANGE HERE
return [];
}
let newArr = []
for (let i = 0; i <= arr.length; i++) {
let result = arr[i] + (i + 1)
newArr.push(result)
if (newArr[i] > 9 ) {
newArr[i] = newArr[i] % 10; // CHANGE HERE
}
}
const filteredArr = newArr.filter(el => el >= 0 && el <= 9)
return filteredArr
}
console.log(incrementer([2, 4, 6, 8, 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 2]));
console.log(incrementer([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8]));

Please see below code.
const incrementer = arr => {
if (arr === []) {
return [];
}
let newArr = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
let result = arr[i] + (i + 1);
// newArr.push(result);
if (result > 9) {
let singleDigit = Number(result.toString().split("")[1]);
newArr.push(singleDigit);
} else {
newArr.push(result);
}
}
// const filteredArr = newArr.filter(el => el >= 0 && el <= 9);
return newArr;
};
console.log(incrementer([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8]))

const incrementer = (arr) => {
if (arr === []) {
return []
}
return arr.map((number, index) => (number + index + 1) % 10);
}
Doing the needed additions in (number + index + 1) and % 10 operation will get the last digit.

Add every n items in an array

I have an array like so:
[5, 12, 43, 65, 34 ...]
Just a normal array of numbers.
What I wan't to do is write a function group(n, arr) which adds every n numbers in the array.
For example if I call group(2, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]) it should return
[
3 //1+2,
7 //3+4,
11 //5+6,
15 //7+8,
19 //9+10,
11 //whatever remains
]
I haven't tried anything yet, I will soon update with what I can.

You can use .reduce as follows:
function group(n, arr) {
// initialize array to be returned
let res = [];
// validate n
if(n > 0 && n <= arr.length) {
// iterate over arr while updating acc
res = arr.reduce((acc, num, index) => {
// if the current index has no remainder with n, add a new number
if(index%n === 0) acc.push(num);
// else update the last added number to the array
else acc[acc.length-1] += num;
// return acc in each iteration
return acc;
}, []);
}
return res;
}
console.log( group(2, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]) );

This approach features two loops, one for checking the outer index and anoter for iterating the wanted count of items for summing.
function group(n, array) {
const result = [];
let i = 0;
while (i < array.length) {
let sum = 0;
for (let j = 0; j < n && i + j < array.length; j++) {
sum += array[i + j];
}
result.push(sum);
i += n;
}
return result;
}
console.log(group(2, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]));

You could use Array.from to create the result array and then use its mapper to make the sums. These sums can be made by using reduce on the relevant slice of the array .
This is a functional programming solution:
const group = (step, arr) =>
Array.from({length: Math.ceil(arr.length/step)}, (_, i) =>
arr.slice(i*step, (i+1)*step).reduce((a, b) => a+b)
);
console.log(group(2, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]));

Does JavaScript have a method like "range()" to generate a range within the supplied bounds?

In PHP, you can do...
range(1, 3); // Array(1, 2, 3)
range("A", "C"); // Array("A", "B", "C")
That is, there is a function that lets you get a range of numbers or characters by passing the upper and lower bounds.
Is there anything built-in to JavaScript natively for this? If not, how would I implement it?

Numbers
[...Array(5).keys()];
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Character iteration
String.fromCharCode(...[...Array('D'.charCodeAt(0) - 'A'.charCodeAt(0) + 1).keys()].map(i => i + 'A'.charCodeAt(0)));
=> "ABCD"
Iteration
for (const x of Array(5).keys()) {
console.log(x, String.fromCharCode('A'.charCodeAt(0) + x));
}
=> 0,"A" 1,"B" 2,"C" 3,"D" 4,"E"
As functions
function range(size, startAt = 0) {
return [...Array(size).keys()].map(i => i + startAt);
}
function characterRange(startChar, endChar) {
return String.fromCharCode(...range(endChar.charCodeAt(0) -
startChar.charCodeAt(0), startChar.charCodeAt(0)))
}
As typed functions
function range(size:number, startAt:number = 0):ReadonlyArray<number> {
return [...Array(size).keys()].map(i => i + startAt);
}
function characterRange(startChar:string, endChar:string):ReadonlyArray<string> {
return String.fromCharCode(...range(endChar.charCodeAt(0) -
startChar.charCodeAt(0), startChar.charCodeAt(0)))
}
lodash.js _.range() function
_.range(10);
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
_.range(1, 11);
=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
_.range(0, 30, 5);
=> [0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
_.range(0, -10, -1);
=> [0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9]
String.fromCharCode(..._.range('A'.charCodeAt(0), 'D'.charCodeAt(0) + 1));
=> "ABCD"
Old non es6 browsers without a library:
Array.apply(null, Array(5)).map(function (_, i) {return i;});
=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
console.log([...Array(5).keys()]);
(ES6 credit to nils petersohn and other commenters)

For numbers you can use ES6 Array.from(), which works in everything these days except IE:
Shorter version:
Array.from({length: 20}, (x, i) => i);
Longer version:
Array.from(new Array(20), (x, i) => i);​​​​​​
which creates an array from 0 to 19 inclusive. This can be further shortened to one of these forms:
Array.from(Array(20).keys());
// or
[...Array(20).keys()];
Lower and upper bounds can be specified too, for example:
Array.from(new Array(20), (x, i) => i + *lowerBound*);
An article describing this in more detail: http://www.2ality.com/2014/05/es6-array-methods.html

My new favorite form (ES2015)
Array(10).fill(1).map((x, y) => x + y)
And if you need a function with a step param:
const range = (start, stop, step = 1) =>
Array(Math.ceil((stop - start) / step)).fill(start).map((x, y) => x + y * step)
Another possible implementation suggested by the MDN docs:
// Sequence generator function
// (commonly referred to as "range", e.g. Clojure, PHP etc)
const range = (start, stop, step) =>
Array.from({ length: (stop - start) / step + 1}, (_, i) => start + (i * step))

Here's my 2 cents:
function range(start, end) {
return Array.apply(0, Array(end - 1))
.map((element, index) => index + start);
}

It works for characters and numbers, going forwards or backwards with an optional step.
var range = function(start, end, step) {
var range = [];
var typeofStart = typeof start;
var typeofEnd = typeof end;
if (step === 0) {
throw TypeError("Step cannot be zero.");
}
if (typeofStart == "undefined" || typeofEnd == "undefined") {
throw TypeError("Must pass start and end arguments.");
} else if (typeofStart != typeofEnd) {
throw TypeError("Start and end arguments must be of same type.");
}
typeof step == "undefined" && (step = 1);
if (end < start) {
step = -step;
}
if (typeofStart == "number") {
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(start);
start += step;
}
} else if (typeofStart == "string") {
if (start.length != 1 || end.length != 1) {
throw TypeError("Only strings with one character are supported.");
}
start = start.charCodeAt(0);
end = end.charCodeAt(0);
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(String.fromCharCode(start));
start += step;
}
} else {
throw TypeError("Only string and number types are supported");
}
return range;
}
jsFiddle.
If augmenting native types is your thing, then assign it to Array.range.
var range = function(start, end, step) {
var range = [];
var typeofStart = typeof start;
var typeofEnd = typeof end;
if (step === 0) {
throw TypeError("Step cannot be zero.");
}
if (typeofStart == "undefined" || typeofEnd == "undefined") {
throw TypeError("Must pass start and end arguments.");
} else if (typeofStart != typeofEnd) {
throw TypeError("Start and end arguments must be of same type.");
}
typeof step == "undefined" && (step = 1);
if (end < start) {
step = -step;
}
if (typeofStart == "number") {
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(start);
start += step;
}
} else if (typeofStart == "string") {
if (start.length != 1 || end.length != 1) {
throw TypeError("Only strings with one character are supported.");
}
start = start.charCodeAt(0);
end = end.charCodeAt(0);
while (step > 0 ? end >= start : end <= start) {
range.push(String.fromCharCode(start));
start += step;
}
} else {
throw TypeError("Only string and number types are supported");
}
return range;
}
console.log(range("A", "Z", 1));
console.log(range("Z", "A", 1));
console.log(range("A", "Z", 3));
console.log(range(0, 25, 1));
console.log(range(0, 25, 5));
console.log(range(20, 5, 5));

Simple range function:
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step || 1);
}
return a;
}
To incorporate the BigInt data type some check can be included, ensuring that all variables are same typeof start:
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
if (typeof start == 'bigint') {
stop = BigInt(stop)
step = step? BigInt(step): 1n;
} else
step = step || 1;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step);
}
return a;
}
To remove values higher than defined by stop e.g. range(0,5,2) will include 6, which shouldn't be.
function range(start, stop, step) {
var a = [start], b = start;
while (b < stop) {
a.push(b += step || 1);
}
return (b > stop) ? a.slice(0,-1) : a;
}

OK, in JavaScript we don't have a range() function like PHP, so we need to create the function which is quite easy thing, I write couple of one-line functions for you and separate them for Numbers and Alphabets as below:
for Numbers:
function numberRange (start, end) {
return new Array(end - start).fill().map((d, i) => i + start);
}
and call it like:
numberRange(5, 10); //[5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
for Alphabets:
function alphabetRange (start, end) {
return new Array(end.charCodeAt(0) - start.charCodeAt(0)).fill().map((d, i) => String.fromCharCode(i + start.charCodeAt(0)));
}
and call it like:
alphabetRange('c', 'h'); //["c", "d", "e", "f", "g"]

Array.range = function(a, b, step){
var A = [];
if(typeof a == 'number'){
A[0] = a;
step = step || 1;
while(a+step <= b){
A[A.length]= a+= step;
}
}
else {
var s = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz';
if(a === a.toUpperCase()){
b = b.toUpperCase();
s = s.toUpperCase();
}
s = s.substring(s.indexOf(a), s.indexOf(b)+ 1);
A = s.split('');
}
return A;
}
Array.range(0,10);
// [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
Array.range(-100,100,20);
// [-100,-80,-60,-40,-20,0,20,40,60,80,100]
Array.range('A','F');
// ['A','B','C','D','E','F')
Array.range('m','r');
// ['m','n','o','p','q','r']

https://stackoverflow.com/a/49577331/8784402
With Delta/Step
smallest and one-liner
[...Array(N)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Examples and other alternatives
[...Array(10)].map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array.from(Array(10)).map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array.from(Array(10).keys()).map(i => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
[...Array(10).keys()].map(i => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Array(10).fill(0).map((_, i) => 4 + i * 2);
//=> [4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22]
Array(10).fill().map((_, i) => 4 + i * -2);
//=> [4, 2, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -14]
Range Function
const range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
range(0, 9, 2);
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
// can also assign range function as static method in Array class (but not recommended )
Array.range = (from, to, step) =>
[...Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)].map((_, i) => from + i * step);
Array.range(2, 10, 2);
//=> [2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
Array.range(0, 10, 1);
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Array.range(2, 10, -1);
//=> []
Array.range(3, 0, -1);
//=> [3, 2, 1, 0]
As Iterators
class Range {
constructor(total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
}
}
[...new Range(5)]; // Five Elements
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
[...new Range(5, 2)]; // Five Elements With Step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4, 6, 8]
[...new Range(5, -2, 10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From 10
//=>[10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
[...new Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of new Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
As Generators Only
const Range = function* (total = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
for (let i = 0; i < total; yield from + i++ * step) {}
};
Array.from(Range(5, -2, -10));
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
[...Range(5, -2, -10)]; // Five Elements With Step -2 From -10
//=> [-10, -12, -14, -16, -18]
// Also works with for..of loop
for (i of Range(5, -2, 10)) console.log(i);
// 10 8 6 4 2
// Lazy loaded way
const number0toInf = Range(Infinity);
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 0
number0toInf.next().value;
//=> 1
// ...
From-To with steps/delta
using iterators
class Range2 {
constructor(to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
this[Symbol.iterator] = function* () {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
}
}
[...new Range2(5)]; // First 5 Whole Numbers
//=> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
[...new Range2(5, 2)]; // From 0 to 5 with step 2
//=> [0, 2, 4]
[...new Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
using Generators
const Range2 = function* (to = 0, step = 1, from = 0) {
let i = 0,
length = Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1;
while (i < length) yield from + i++ * step;
};
[...Range2(5, -2, 10)]; // From 10 to 5 with step -2
//=> [10, 8, 6]
let even4to10 = Range2(10, 2, 4);
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 4
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 6
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 8
even4to10.next().value;
//=> 10
even4to10.next().value;
//=> undefined
For Typescript
class _Array<T> extends Array<T> {
static range(from: number, to: number, step: number): number[] {
return Array.from(Array(Math.floor((to - from) / step) + 1)).map(
(v, k) => from + k * step
);
}
}
_Array.range(0, 9, 1);
https://stackoverflow.com/a/64599169/8784402
Generate Character List with one-liner
const charList = (a,z,d=1)=>(a=a.charCodeAt(),z=z.charCodeAt(),[...Array(Math.floor((z-a)/d)+1)].map((_,i)=>String.fromCharCode(a+i*d)));
console.log("from A to G", charList('A', 'G'));
console.log("from A to Z with step/delta of 2", charList('A', 'Z', 2));
console.log("reverse order from Z to P", charList('Z', 'P', -1));
console.log("from 0 to 5", charList('0', '5', 1));
console.log("from 9 to 5", charList('9', '5', -1));
console.log("from 0 to 8 with step 2", charList('0', '8', 2));
console.log("from α to ω", charList('α', 'ω'));
console.log("Hindi characters from क to ह", charList('क', 'ह'));
console.log("Russian characters from А to Я", charList('А', 'Я'));
For TypeScript
const charList = (p: string, q: string, d = 1) => {
const a = p.charCodeAt(0),
z = q.charCodeAt(0);
return [...Array(Math.floor((z - a) / d) + 1)].map((_, i) =>
String.fromCharCode(a + i * d)
);
};

var range = (l,r) => new Array(r - l).fill().map((_,k) => k + l);

Handy function to do the trick, run the code snippet below
function range(start, end, step, offset) {
var len = (Math.abs(end - start) + ((offset || 0) * 2)) / (step || 1) + 1;
var direction = start < end ? 1 : -1;
var startingPoint = start - (direction * (offset || 0));
var stepSize = direction * (step || 1);
return Array(len).fill(0).map(function(_, index) {
return startingPoint + (stepSize * index);
});
}
console.log('range(1, 5)=> ' + range(1, 5));
console.log('range(5, 1)=> ' + range(5, 1));
console.log('range(5, 5)=> ' + range(5, 5));
console.log('range(-5, 5)=> ' + range(-5, 5));
console.log('range(-10, 5, 5)=> ' + range(-10, 5, 5));
console.log('range(1, 5, 1, 2)=> ' + range(1, 5, 1, 2));
here is how to use it
range (Start, End, Step=1, Offset=0);
inclusive - forward range(5,10) // [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
inclusive - backward range(10,5) // [10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5]
step - backward range(10,2,2) // [10, 8, 6, 4, 2]
exclusive - forward range(5,10,0,-1) // [6, 7, 8, 9] not 5,10 themselves
offset - expand range(5,10,0,1) // [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
offset - shrink range(5,10,0,-2) // [7, 8]
step - expand range(10,0,2,2) // [12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 2, 0, -2]
hope you find it useful.
And here is how it works.
Basically I'm first calculating the length of the resulting array and create a zero filled array to that length, then fill it with the needed values
(step || 1) => And others like this means use the value of step and if it was not provided use 1 instead
We start by calculating the length of the result array using (Math.abs(end - start) + ((offset || 0) * 2)) / (step || 1) + 1) to put it simpler (difference* offset in both direction/step)
After getting the length, then we create an empty array with initialized values using new Array(length).fill(0); check here
Now we have an array [0,0,0,..] to the length we want. We map over it and return a new array with the values we need by using Array.map(function() {})
var direction = start < end ? 1 : 0; Obviously if start is not smaller than the end we need to move backward. I mean going from 0 to 5 or vice versa
On every iteration, startingPoint + stepSize * index will gives us the value we need

--- UPDATE (Thanks to #lokhmakov for simplification) ---
Another version using ES6 generators ( see great Paolo Moretti answer with ES6 generators ):
const RANGE = (x,y) => Array.from((function*(){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})());
console.log(RANGE(3,7)); // [ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]
Or, if we only need iterable, then:
const RANGE_ITER = (x,y) => (function*(){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})();
for (let n of RANGE_ITER(3,7)){
console.log(n);
}
// 3
// 4
// 5
// 6
// 7
--- ORGINAL code was: ---
const RANGE = (a,b) => Array.from((function*(x,y){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})(a,b));
and
const RANGE_ITER = (a,b) => (function*(x,y){
while (x <= y) yield x++;
})(a,b);

Using Harmony spread operator and arrow functions:
var range = (start, end) => [...Array(end - start + 1)].map((_, i) => start + i);
Example:
range(10, 15);
[ 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ]

If, on Visual Studio Code, you faced the error:
Type 'IterableIterator' is not an array type or a string type. Use compiler option '--downlevelIteration' to allow iterating of iterators.
Instead of
[...Array(3).keys()]
you can rely on
Array.from(Array(3).keys())
More on downlevelIteration

You can use lodash or Undescore.js range:
var range = require('lodash/range')
range(10)
// -> [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
Alternatively, if you only need a consecutive range of integers you can do something like:
Array.apply(undefined, { length: 10 }).map(Number.call, Number)
// -> [ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]
In ES6 range can be implemented with generators:
function* range(start=0, end=null, step=1) {
if (end == null) {
end = start;
start = 0;
}
for (let i=start; i < end; i+=step) {
yield i;
}
}
This implementation saves memory when iterating large sequences, because it doesn't have to materialize all values into an array:
for (let i of range(1, oneZillion)) {
console.log(i);
}

Did some research on some various Range Functions.
Checkout the jsperf comparison of the different ways to do these functions. Certainly not a perfect or exhaustive list, but should help :)
The Winner is...
function range(lowEnd,highEnd){
var arr = [],
c = highEnd - lowEnd + 1;
while ( c-- ) {
arr[c] = highEnd--
}
return arr;
}
range(0,31);
Technically its not the fastest on firefox, but crazy speed difference (imho) on chrome makes up for it.
Also interesting observation is how much faster chrome is with these array functions than firefox. Chrome is at least 4 or 5 times faster.

range(start,end,step): With ES6 Iterators
You only ask for an upper and lower bounds. Here we create one with a step too.
You can easily create range() generator function which can function as an iterator. This means you don't have to pre-generate the entire array.
function * range ( start, end, step = 1 ) {
let state = start;
while ( state < end ) {
yield state;
state += step;
}
return;
};
Now you may want to create something that pre-generates the array from the iterator and returns a list. This is useful for functions that accept an array. For this we can use Array.from()
const generate_array = (start,end,step) =>
Array.from( range(start,end,step) );
Now you can generate a static array easily,
const array1 = generate_array(1,10,2);
const array1 = generate_array(1,7);
But when something desires an iterator (or gives you the option to use an iterator) you can easily create one too.
for ( const i of range(1, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER, 7) ) {
console.log(i)
}
Special Notes
If you use Ramda, they have their own R.range as does Lodash

This may not be the best way. But if you are looking to get a range of numbers in a single line of code. For example 10 - 50
Array(40).fill(undefined).map((n, i) => i + 10)
Where 40 is (end - start) and 10 is the start. This should return [10, 11, ..., 50]

Not implemented yet!
Using the new Number.range proposal (stage 1):
[...Number.range(1, 10)]
//=> [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]

(from, to) => [...Array(to - from)].map((_,i)=> i + from)

An interesting challenge would be to write the shortest function to do this. Recursion to the rescue!
function r(a,b){return a>b?[]:[a].concat(r(++a,b))}
Tends to be slow on large ranges, but luckily quantum computers are just around the corner.
An added bonus is that it's obfuscatory. Because we all know how important it is to hide our code from prying eyes.
To truly and utterly obfuscate the function, do this:
function r(a,b){return (a<b?[a,b].concat(r(++a,--b)):a>b?[]:[a]).sort(function(a,b){return a-b})}

I would code something like this:
function range(start, end) {
return Array(end-start).join(0).split(0).map(function(val, id) {return id+start});
}
range(-4,2);
// [-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1]
range(3,9);
// [3,4,5,6,7,8]
It behaves similarly to Python range:
>>> range(-4,2)
[-4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1]

My personal favorite:
const range = (start, end) => new Array(end-start+1).fill().map((el, ind) => ind + start);

ES6
Use Array.from (docs here):
const range = (start, stop, step) => Array.from({ length: (stop - start) / step + 1}, (_, i) => start + (i * step));

A rather minimalistic implementation that heavily employs ES6 can be created as follows, drawing particular attention to the Array.from() static method:
const getRange = (start, stop) => Array.from(
new Array((stop - start) + 1),
(_, i) => i + start
);

The standard Javascript doesn't have a built-in function to generate ranges. Several javascript frameworks add support for such features, or as others have pointed out you can always roll your own.
If you'd like to double-check, the definitive resource is the ECMA-262 Standard.

Though this is not from PHP, but an imitation of range from Python.
function range(start, end) {
var total = [];
if (!end) {
end = start;
start = 0;
}
for (var i = start; i < end; i += 1) {
total.push(i);
}
return total;
}
console.log(range(10)); // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
console.log(range(0, 10)); // [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
console.log(range(5, 10)); // [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

This one works also in reverse.
const range = ( a , b ) => Array.from( new Array( b > a ? b - a : a - b ), ( x, i ) => b > a ? i + a : a - i );
range( -3, 2 ); // [ -3, -2, -1, 0, 1 ]
range( 1, -4 ); // [ 1, 0, -1, -2, -3 ]

As far as generating a numeric array for a given range, I use this:
function range(start, stop)
{
var array = [];
var length = stop - start;
for (var i = 0; i <= length; i++) {
array[i] = start;
start++;
}
return array;
}
console.log(range(1, 7)); // [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]
console.log(range(5, 10)); // [5,6,7,8,9,10]
console.log(range(-2, 3)); // [-2,-1,0,1,2,3]
Obviously, it won't work for alphabetical arrays.

You can use following one-liner to keep things short and simple
var start = 4;
var end = 20;
console.log(Array(end - start + 1).fill(start).map((x, y) => x + y));