I need to create function that creates and returns array. Its size needs to match the rows parameter, and each next element contains consecutive integers starting at 1. To call this function I need to use argument 5. Here below is what I wrote so far. Can you tell me what's wrong here?
function createArray(rows) {
for(let i = 1; i < rows.length; i++) {
console.log(rows[i]);
}return rows;
}
createArray(5);
You need to create an array and return it, whereas you return just rows which is a number. The idea of using a for loop is the best way to go. In that loop you just need to set the values in the array accordinlgy.
Another problem in your code is that rows is of type number and does have a property length but that does not have the desired value. So we just use rows in the for loop. We start the loop with i = 0 because array indices start at 0.
Code
function createArray(rows) {
let arr = new Array(rows);
for (let i = 0; i < rows; i++) {
arr[i] = i + 1;
}
return arr;
}
console.log(createArray(5));
We can not use length property for number. create an empty array and then push values into that array until required size is achieved.
function createArray(rows) {
var arr = [];
for(let i = 1; i <= rows; i++) {
arr.push(i);
}return arr;
}
createArray(5);
I think what you want is createArray(5) return [1,2,3,4,5] if that's the case you could do this
function createArray(rows) {
const arr = []
for(let i = 1; i <= rows; i++) {
arr.push(i);
}
return arr;
}
console.log(createArray(5));
The problem is, that rows.length is not available on 5, because 5 is a number.
You have to use an array as parameter:
Array(5) creates an array with the length of 5 and fill("hello") fills this array with "hello" values.
function createArray(rows) {
for (let i = 1; i < rows.length; i++) {
console.log(rows[i]);
}
return rows;
}
const rows = Array(5).fill("hello");
createArray(rows);
I don't know, if this is the behaviour you want, if not, I misunderstood your question.
I am trying to write a programme to move all the zeroes at the end of the array and retain and the original order of other elements.
Here is my code:-
var moveZeros = function (arr) {
// TODO: Program me
var k=0;
for (var i=0;i<=arr.length-1;i++){
var s=arr[i];
if (s===0){
arr.splice(i,1);
k++
}
}
for (var j=0;j<=k-1;j++){
arr.push(0);
}
return arr
}
But when zeros are next to each other like [1,0,0,1] it doesn't work.
I don't see why.
Can anybody tell?
And please also explain why k-1 not k I wrote k-1 by observing the output.
Please don't tell the answer to the original problem I just want to fix the problem with my code. :)
The problem is that in each loop you increase the i variable by one. Meaning, you go to the next index. But if you have 2 or more zeros in the row, and you remove the first one, you shouldn't change i to i + 1, because i already points at a new value in the array(which is zero) :)
var moveZeros = function (arr) {
// TODO: Program me
var k = 0;
for (var i = 0; i <= arr.length - 1;) {
var s = arr[i];
if (s === 0) {
arr.splice(i, 1);
k++;
} else {
i++;
}
}
for (var j = 0; j <= k - 1; j++) {
arr.push(0);
}
return arr;
};
console.log(moveZeros([1,0,0,2]));
for (var i = 0; i < firstString.length; i++) {
newArray.push(i);
return newArray;
}
What code am i missing? Outputting [0], when i want to output [0,1,2,3,4,5,6]
What exactly am i doing with my code, since it's not what i think?
I've seen this --->
function someFunction(n){
var newArray = [];
for(var i=0; i < n.length; i++){
newArray.push(n[i]);
}
return newArray;
}
but i'm not looking to get the length of a function.
return will cause the code to exit the current method. Since you have put the return inside the for loop, your method is exiting after the first pass through the loop, thus returning only the output [0].
Move your return newArray; outside the loop.
Move the return statement out of the for loop, because it exits the function and the iteration.
for (var i = 0; i < firstString.length; i++) {
newArray.push(i);
}
return newArray;
Can someone debug this code? I cannot for the life of me find the (run-time) error:
function generate_fibonacci(n1, n2, max, out){
var n = n1+n2;
if(n<max){
out.push(n);
generate_fibonacci(n2, n, max, out);
}
}
function generate_fibonacci_sequence(max){
var out = [1];
generate_fibonacci(0, 1, max, out);
return out;
}
function remove_odd_numbers(arr){
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if(!(arr[i]%2==0)){
arr.splice(i, 1);
}
}
return arr;
}
function sum(array){
var total = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
total+=array[i];
}
return total;
}
var fib_sq = generate_fibonacci_sequence(4000000);
console.log("Before: " + fib_sq);
remove_odd_numbers(fib_sq);
console.log("After: " + fib_sq);
console.log("WTH?: " + remove_odd_numbers([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]));
Output:
Before: 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,377,610,987,1597,2584,4181,6765,10946,17711,28657,46368,75025,121393,196418,317811,514229,832040,1346269,2178309,3524578
After: 1,2,5,8,21,34,89,144,377,610,1597,2584,6765,10946,28657,46368,121393,196418,514229,832040,2178309,3524578
WTH?: 2,4,6,8
[Finished in 0.3s]
I'm going crazy or something. For some reason, all odd numbers are not being removed. But as you can see at the end, it works perfectly. I have no idea what is going on.
The problem in the original code is that when you remove the first 1 at index 0, the array gets shifted; now arr[i] is contains the second 1; but you just step over it.
You need to use while instead of if here, or copy to a separate list. This is an example for splicing:
function remove_odd_numbers1(arr){
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
// here
while (arr[i] % 2) {
arr.splice(i, 1);
}
}
return arr;
}
But it will be slow though. Better to create a new array:
function remove_odd_numbers2(arr){
var rv = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (! (arr[i] % 2)) {
rv.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return rv;
}
Generally the best algorithm however is to use the same array, if the original is not needed, so that no extra memory is required (though on javascript this is of a bit dubious value):
function remove_odd_numbers3(arr){
var out = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (! (arr[i] % 2)) {
arr[out++] = arr[i];
}
}
arr.length = out;
return arr;
}
Notice however that unlike the splice algorithm, this runs in O(n) time.
Also, the Array.prototype.filter() is not bad, being a builtin. It also creates a new array and thus is comparable to the 2.
I'm not sure about this, however I doubt using splice is efficient compared to creating a new array.
function remove_odd_numbers(arr) {
var notOdd = [],
i = 0,
len = arr.length,
num;
for (; i < len; i++) {
!((num = arr[i]) % 2) && notOdd.push(num);
}
return notOdd;
}
EDIT: You should probably use the native filter function, as suggested by #Jack. I leave this answer as a reference.
Here is a really simple, fast way to do it. Using your data, it only took 48ms to complete. Hope this helps..
function noOdds(values){
return values.filter(function (num) {
return num % 2 === 0;
});
}
Because splice() modifies the array, your index will be off in the next iteration; you need to either decrease the loop variable, use a while loop like Antti proposed or iterate backwards like Crazy Train mentioned.
That said, the use of splice() is awkward to work with because it modifies the array in-place. This functionality can be easily accomplished using a filter function as well:
function remove_odd_numbers(arr)
{
return arr.filter(function(value) {
return value % 2 == 0;
});
}
This creates and returns a new array with only the even values.
Given the recency of this function, check the compatibility section how to handle browsers IE < 9. Many popular libraries, such as jQuery, underscore, etc. take care of this for you.
Update
Instead of filtering the array afterwards, it would be more memory efficient to only add the even values as you perform the recursion:
function generate_fibonacci(previous, current, max, callback)
{
var next = previous + current;
if (next < max) {
callback(next);
generate_fibonacci(current, next, max, callback);
}
}
function generate_fibonacci_sequence(max, callback)
{
callback(1);
callback(1);
generate_fibonacci(1, 1, max, callback);
}
var out = [];
generate_fibonacci_sequence(4000000, function(value) {
if (value % 2 == 0) {
out.push(value);
}
});
Instead of passing the out array, I'm passing a function to be called whenever a new sequence value is generated; the filtering is done inside that callback.
ES6 version from "Tabetha Moe" answer
function noOdds(arr) {
return arr.filter(value => value % 2 === 0);
}
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
var numbers = arr();
var arraySum = "";
for (var i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
arraySum = arraySum + arr[i];
};
if (numbers.max() <= arraySum) {
arr = true
}
else if (numbers.max() > arraySum) {
arr = false;
}
return arr;
}
I need to find the numbers stored in an array called arr and check if they add up to or total the greatest number or whether they do not. If so, return true. If not, return false.
I am not sure I am calling the array correctly in the beginning.
Thanks
I actually wrote a library I use just for functions like this.
http://code.google.com/p/pseudosavant/downloads/detail?name=psMathStats.min.js
You would just do this:
var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,300];
if (arr.max() > arr.sum()){
// Max is greater than sum...
}
One warning though. This library prototypes the Array object which could mess up other scripting that uses for (var i in arr) on an Array, which you shouldn't ever do. I am actually almost done with v2 of the library with a number of new functions and it no longer prototypes the Array object.
You can just grab the .max() and .sum() methods from the code, and use them without the prototyping if you want though.
maxArray = function (arr) {
return Math.max.apply(Math, arr);
}
sumArray = function (arr) {
for (var i = 0, length = arr.length, sum = 0; i < length; sum += arr[i++]);
return sum;
}
You mean something like this?
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
for (var i = 0, sum=0; i < arr.length; i++) {
sum += arr[i];
}
return Math.max.apply( Math, arr ) <= sum;
}
function ArrayAdditionI(input) {
var arraySum, max;
arraySum = max = input[0];
for (var i = 1; i < input.length; i++) {
arraySum += input[i];
if(input[i] > max){
max = input[i];
}
};
return arraySum >= max;
}
If the numbers are positive, the answer is guaranteed - the sum is always greater than or equal to the max. If you need to calculate it, ddlshack's code looks good.
Looking at your code, there are a number of issues. First of all, arr() should error out. Arrays aren't functions, and trying to treat them as a function does nothing. Your array is already usable when it is passed in. Additionally, you want to initialize arraySum to 0, not "". The way you are doing it, the values in the array will be coerced into strings and concatenated together, which is not what you are looking for. Finally, arrays don't implement a max() method, but Math does, and functions/methods in javascript can be applied to an array in the manner shown by ddlshack and others.
There are some syntax errors: type missmatch, wrong assign and calls to method that doesn't exists. If I'm understanding what do you want to do, this is the correct code(if changing items order is not a problem):
function ArrayAdditionI(arr) {
var ret = false;
var arraySum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
arraySum += arr[i];
}
if (arr.sort()[arr.length-1] <= arraySum) {
ret = true
}
return ret;
}