I'm currently working on a simple filemanager component which I trigger from parent component. After selecting media in the filemanager I $dispatch a simple data object with 2 keys: element & media. I use element to keep track where I want the media to be appended to my current data object and media has the media information (id, type, name and so on). This setup gives me some trouble when I want to $set the media data to variables within my data object. The variables are locales, so: nl-NL, de-NL and so on.
setMediaForPage : function(data){
if(!this.page.media[this.selectedLanguage]['id'])
{
// set for all locales
var obj = this;
this.application.locales.forEach(function(element, index, array) {
obj.$set(obj.page.media[element.locale], data.media);
})
}
else
{
// set for 1 locale
this.$set(this.page.media[this.selectedLanguage], data.media);
}
}
What happens when I run this code is that the data object shows up properly in Vue Devtools data object, but the media does not show up in the template. When I switch the language (by changing the this.selectedLanguage value), the media does show up.
I think this has to do with the variables in the object keypath, but I'm not 100% sure about that. Any thoughts on how to improve this code so I can show the selected media in the parent component without having to change the this.selectedLanguagevalue?
I don't know your data structure exactly, but you can certainly use variables as the the keypath in vue, however remember that the keyPath should be a string, not an object.
If your variable that you want to use in the keypath is part of the vue, you'd do it like this:
obj.$set('page.media[element.locale]', data.media)
... because the keyPath which is a string is intelligently parsed by Vue's $set method and is of course it knows that this path is relative to the $data object.
new Vue({
el: '#app',
data() {
return {
msg: "hello world",
attr: {
lang: {
zh: '中文',
en: 'english'
}
}
}
},
methods: {
$set2(obj, propertyName, value) {
let arr = propertyName.split('.');
let keyPath = arr.slice(0, -1).join('.');
let key = arr[arr.length - 1];
const bailRE = /[^\w.$]/
function parsePath(obj, path) {
if (bailRE.test(path)) {
return
}
const segments = path.split('.')
for (let i = 0; i < segments.length; i++) {
if (!obj) return
obj = obj[segments[i]]
}
return obj
}
let target = parsePath(obj, keyPath);
// console.log(target, key);
// target[key] = value;
this.$set(target, key, value);
}
},
mounted() {
setTimeout(() => {
// this.$set('attr.lang.zh', '嗯');
// this.$set2(this, 'attr.lang.zh', '嗯');
this.$set2(this.attr, 'lang.zh', '嗯');
}, 1000);
}
})
调用示例:this.$set2(this.attr, 'lang.zh', '嗯');
i have also experienced similar problems,remove variables -,these variables nl-NL, de-NL change to nlNl, deNl
and i not use
obj.$set('page.media[element.locale]', data.media)
but
obj.$set('page.media.'+element.locale, data.media);
then it work
Related
I have done it using ...qqParam['queryParams'] but is this the right approach?
const qqParam = {};
if (view) {
qqParam['queryParams'] = { view: view };
}
if (productNumber) {
qqParam['queryParams'] = { ...qqParam['queryParams'], mode: 'productNumber' };
}
I think your approach is correct, just a couple things that can simplify your code while keeping it readable:
if you know you'll always need queryParam attribute, you can call it like this: qqParam.queryParam without the [], if the key of the attribute is dynamic then you're doing it ok by passing it as a variable qqParam[variable].
you're in both ifs modifying the same value so you might consider doing that on one statement:
qqParam.queryParams = {
...(view && {view}),
...(productNumber && {mode:'productMode' })
};
Your sample code works but you can simplify it.
You don't need to use the square brackets when assigning a property to the object unless it contains a symbol, a special character or a computed property name.
const qqParam = {};
if(view) {
qqParam.queryParams = { view };
}
if(productNumber) {
qqParam.queryParams = { ...qqParam.queryParams, mode: 'productNumber' };
}
Your approach is fine. one improve that you can do is not to use : {'view' : view}.
you can just use {view} as the default key will be the value name when you not specifing one.
Also, i guess that 'productNumber' should be the variable productNumber and not the string 'productNumber'.
const qqParam = {};
if (view) {
qqParam['queryParams'] = { view };
}
if (productNumber) {
qqParam['queryParams'] = { ...qqParam['queryParams'], mode: productNumber };
}
I use Vue with Vuex. In one case I use Ajax to get a presentation value. Somewhere on the way, probably in computed it's no longer reactive.
In my component:
props: [ 'x', 'y' ],
template: `
<div class="presentation">
{{ presentation }}
</div>
`,
computed: {
presentation() {
return this.$store.getters.presentation({ x: this.x, y: this.y });
}
}
Vuex store:
const store = new Vuex.Store({
state: {
table: {
data: []
}
},
...
Vuex actions:
I call an url with ajax and return a promise. I also commit a mutation.
actions: {
save: (context) => {
let uri = 'some/uri';
let params = {};
let value = 'A value';
return axios
.post(uri, params)
.then((response) => {
context.commit('setPresentation', value);
})
.catch((error) => {
console.log('error');
})
.finally(() => {});
},
},
Vuex mutations:
mutations: {
setPresentation: (state, value) => {
let pos = state.table.pos;
state.table.data[pos.y][pos.x].presentation = value;
},
}
Vuex getters:
getters: {
presentation: (state) => (pos) => {
return state.table.data[pos.y][pos.x].presentation;
}
},
I've already make sure of the following:
I set up the table.data state to a default value to make it reactive
Using a getter to get the data
Using an action for the ajax call
Call a mutation with a commit in the action
Notes:
The ajax call needs to be in an action and not in created, because I'm going to use presentation from more than one component.
I prefer a solution which does not need external Vue plugins.
Question(s)
What did I miss?
How can I solve it in the best way?
You need to use Vue.set instead of state.table.data[pos.y][pos.x].presentation = value;
See https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/guide/list.html#Caveats for details
Try to update your mutation with the following code:
if (!state.table.data[pos.y]) {
Vue.set(state.table.data, pos.y, [])
}
Vue.set(state.table.data[pos.y], pos.x, { presentation: value })
A word from me, the OP (Original poster):
Why it failed the first times was that I only set the last part { presentation: value } with Vue.set as I already has pos.y and pos.x set in another ajax call.
For Vue to be fully aware if the change I needed to set everything that has not already been set in state, with Vue.set. So I needed use Vue.set to set pos.y and pos.x as well.
Also see another excellent answer below.
Vue cannot detect changes to an array when you directly set an item with the index
Your mutation is OK; there's no issues there. Vue will detect the assignment to the presentation property of the object just fine as long as the object is being observed by Vue.
In most cases Vue will automatically observe objects, but there are some quirks (especially with arrays) that you need to be aware of.
Vue cannot detect changes to an array when you directly set an item with the index (docs).
I assume you are populating your arrays in the following manner:
for (let y = 0; y < Y_MAX; y++) {
// This is bad! Vue cannot detect this change
state.table.data[y] = []
for (let x = 0; x < X_MAX; x++) {
// Same as above, Vue cannot detect this change. As a consequence,
// the object you are assigning to the array will not be observed
// by Vue! So if you were to mutate the presentation property
// of this object, Vue won't know about it.
state.table.data[y][x] = { presentation: '...' }
}
}
So to fix your problem you just need to make sure you are not mutating arrays in the following way:
array[index] = whatever
You need to do this instead:
Vue.set(array, index, whatever)
Alternatively, you can build the array first and then assign it to state.table.data last; Vue will detect the assignment and then recursively observe the array and everything contained within it.
const data = []
for (let y = 0; y < Y_MAX; y++) {
data[y] = []
for (let x = 0; x < X_MAX; x++) {
data[y][x] = { presentation: '...' }
}
}
// After this assignment, data (and all objects contained within it)
// will be observable
state.table.data = data
It looks like your props is an array. Are you sure this.x and this.y return the correct values inside your presentation method?
I'm working on a React Native project. Right now, I'm adding new key/value inside an object.
It's working but I would like to know if there is a better way to do it or if you have any advice.
I'm still new to ReactJS/React Native and not 100% skills on Javascript. So here's my code :
My object
state = {
result : {
"q1":1
}
}
My function to add key/value and modify the state of result :
_getValue = (id, value) => {
var newObj = this.state.result;
newObj[id] = parseInt(value);
this.setState({
result: newObj
}, () => {
console.log(this.state.result)
})
}
Thank you !
this should work fine.
this.setState({
result: {
...this.state.result,
[id]: value
}
});
it uses modern/new features such as object spread (...this.state.result) and dynamic object properties ([id]: value)
I'm trying to make the {{#each}} helper to iterate over an object, like in vanilla handlebars. Unfortunately if I use #each on an object, Ember.js version gives me this error:
Assertion failed: The value that #each loops over must be an Array. You passed [object Object]
I wrote this helper in attempt to remedy this:
Ember.Handlebars.helper('every', function (context, options) {
var oArray = [];
for (var k in context) {
oArray.push({
key : k,
value : context[k]
})
}
return Ember.Handlebars.helpers.each(oArray, options);
});
Now, when I attempt to use {{#every}}, I get the following error:
Assertion failed: registerBoundHelper-generated helpers do not support use with Handlebars blocks.
This seems like a basic feature, and I know I'm probably missing something obvious. Can anyone help?
Edit:
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/CbV8X/
Use {{each-in}} helper. You can use it like like {{each}} helper.
Example:
{{#each-in modelWhichIsObject as |key value|}}
`{{key}}`:`{{value}}`
{{/each-in}}
JS Bin demo.
After fiddling with it for a few hours, I came up with this hacky way:
Ember.Handlebars.registerHelper('every', function(context, options) {
var oArray = [], actualData = this.get(context);
for (var k in actualData) {
oArray.push({
key: k,
value: actualData[k]
})
}
this.set(context, oArray);
return Ember.Handlebars.helpers.each.apply(this,
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
});
I don't know what repercussions this.set has, but this seems to work!
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/CbV8X/1/
I've been after similar functionality, and since we're sharing our hacky ways, here's my fiddle for the impatient: http://jsfiddle.net/L6axcob8/1/
This fiddle is based on the one provided by #lxe, with updates by #Kingpin2k, and then myself.
Ember: 1.9.1, Handlebars: 2.0.0, jQuery 2.1.3
Here we are adding a helper called every which can iterate over objects and arrays.
For example this model:
model: function() {
return {
properties: {
foo: 'bar',
zoo: 'zar'
}
};
}
can be iterated with the following handlebars template:
<ul class="properties">
{{#every p in properties}}
<li>{{p.key}} : {{p.value}}</li>
{{/every}}
</ul>
every helper works by creating an array from the objects keys, and then coordinating changes to Ember by way of an ArrayController. Yeah, hacky. This does however, let us add/remove properties to/from an object provided that object supports observation of the [] property.
In my use case I have an Ember.Object derived class which notifies [] when properties are added/removed. I'd recommend looking at Ember.Set for this functionality, although I see that Set been recently deprecated. As this is slightly out of this questions scope I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader. Here's a tip: setUnknownProperty
To be notified of property changes we wrap non-object values in what I've called a DataValueObserver which sets up (currently one way) bindings. These bindings provide a bridge between the values held by our internal ArrayController and the object we are observing.
When dealing with objects; we wrap those in ObjectProxy's so that we can introduce a 'key' member without the need to modify the object itself. Why yes, this does imply that you could use #every recursively. Another exercise for the reader ;-)
I'd recommend having your model be based around Ember.Object to be consistent with the rest of Ember, allowing you to manipulate your model via its get & set handlers. Alternatively, as demonstrated in the fiddle, you can use Em.Get/Em.set to access models, as long as you are consistent in doing so. If you touch your model directly (no get/set), then every won't be notified of your change.
Em.set(model.properties, 'foo', 'asdfsdf');
For completeness here's my every helper:
var DataValueObserver = Ember.Object.extend({
init: function() {
this._super();
// one way binding (for now)
Em.addObserver(this.parent, this.key, this, 'valueChanged');
},
value: function() {
return Em.get(this.parent, this.key);
}.property(),
valueChanged: function() {
this.notifyPropertyChange('value');
}
});
Handlebars.registerHelper("every", function() {
var args = [].slice.call(arguments);
var options = args.pop();
var context = (options.contexts && options.contexts[0]) || this;
Ember.assert("Must be in the form #every foo in bar ", 3 == args.length && args[1] === "in");
options.hash.keyword = args[0];
var property = args[2];
// if we're dealing with an array we can just forward onto the collection helper directly
var p = this.get(property);
if (Ember.Array.detect(p)) {
options.hash.dataSource = p;
return Ember.Handlebars.helpers.collection.call(this, Ember.Handlebars.EachView, options);
}
// create an array that we will manage with content
var array = Em.ArrayController.create();
options.hash.dataSource = array;
Ember.Handlebars.helpers.collection.call(this, Ember.Handlebars.EachView, options);
//
var update_array = function(result) {
if (!result) {
array.clear();
return;
}
// check for proxy object
var result = (result.isProxy && result.content) ? result.content : result;
var items = result;
var keys = Ember.keys(items).sort();
// iterate through sorted array, inserting & removing any mismatches
var i = 0;
for ( ; i < keys.length; ++i) {
var key = keys[i];
var value = items[key];
while (true) {
var old_obj = array.objectAt(i);
if (old_obj) {
Ember.assert("Assume that all objects in our array have a key", undefined !== old_obj.key);
var c = key.localeCompare(old_obj.key);
if (0 === c) break; // already exists
if (c < 0) {
array.removeAt(i); // remove as no longer exists
continue;
}
}
// insert
if (typeof value === 'object') {
// wrap object so we can give it a key
value = Ember.ObjectProxy.create({
content: value,
isProxy: true,
key: key
});
array.insertAt(i, value);
} else {
// wrap raw value so we can give it a key and observe when it changes
value = DataValueObserver.create({
parent: result,
key: key,
});
array.insertAt(i, value);
}
break;
}
}
// remove any trailing items
while (array.objectAt(i)) array.removeAt(i);
};
var should_display = function() {
return true;
};
// use bind helper to call update_array if the contents of property changes
var child_properties = ["[]"];
var preserve_context = true;
return Ember.Handlebars.bind.call(context, property, options, preserve_context, should_display, update_array, child_properties);
});
Inspired by:
How can I make Ember.js handlebars #each iterate over objects?
http://mozmonkey.com/2014/03/ember-getting-the-index-in-each-loops/
https://github.com/emberjs/ember.js/issues/4365
https://gist.github.com/strathmeyer/1371586
Here's that fiddle again if you missed it:
http://jsfiddle.net/L6axcob8/1/
Is there something that I'm missing that would allow item to log as an object with a parameter, but when I try to access that parameter, it's undefined?
What I've tried so far:
console.log(item) => { title: "foo", content: "bar" } , that's fine
console.log(typeof item) => object
console.log(item.title) => "undefined"
I'll include some of the context just in case it's relevant to the problem.
var TextController = function(myCollection) {
this.myCollection = myCollection
}
TextController.prototype.list = function(req, res, next) {
this.myCollection.find({}).exec(function(err, doc) {
var set = new Set([])
doc.forEach(function(item) {
console.log(item) // Here item shows the parameter
console.log(item.title) // "undefined"
set.add(item.title)
})
res.json(set.get());
})
}
Based on suggestion I dropped debugger before this line to check what item actually is via the node repl debugger. This is what I found : http://hastebin.com/qatireweni.sm
From this I tried console.log(item._doc.title) and it works just fine.. So, this seems more like a mongoose question now than anything.
There are questions similar to this, but they seem to be related to 'this' accessing of objects or they're trying to get the object outside the scope of the function. In this case, I don't think I'm doing either of those, but inform me if I'm wrong. Thanks
Solution
You can call the toObject method in order to access the fields. For example:
var itemObject = item.toObject();
console.log(itemObject.title); // "foo"
Why
As you point out that the real fields are stored in the _doc field of the document.
But why console.log(item) => { title: "foo", content: "bar" }?
From the source code of mongoose(document.js), we can find that the toString method of Document call the toObject method. So console.log will show fields 'correctly'. The source code is shown below:
var inspect = require('util').inspect;
...
/**
* Helper for console.log
*
* #api public
*/
Document.prototype.inspect = function(options) {
var isPOJO = options &&
utils.getFunctionName(options.constructor) === 'Object';
var opts;
if (isPOJO) {
opts = options;
} else if (this.schema.options.toObject) {
opts = clone(this.schema.options.toObject);
} else {
opts = {};
}
opts.minimize = false;
opts.retainKeyOrder = true;
return this.toObject(opts);
};
/**
* Helper for console.log
*
* #api public
* #method toString
*/
Document.prototype.toString = function() {
return inspect(this.inspect());
};
Make sure that you have defined title in your schema:
var MyCollectionSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
_id: String,
title: String
});
Try performing a for in loop over item and see if you can access values.
for (var k in item) {
console.log(item[k]);
}
If it works, it would mean your keys have some non-printable characters or something like this.
From what you said in the comments, it looks like somehow item is an instance of a String primitive wrapper.
E.g.
var s = new String('test');
typeof s; //object
s instanceof String; //true
To verify this theory, try this:
eval('(' + item + ')').title;
It could also be that item is an object that has a toString method that displays what you see.
EDIT: To identify these issues quickly, you can use console.dir instead of console.log, since it display an interactive list of the object properties. You can also but a breakpoint and add a watch.
Use findOne() instead of find().
The find() method returns an array of values, even if you have only one possible result, you'll need to use item[0] to get it.
The findOne method returns one object or none, then you'll be able to access its properties with no issues.
Old question, but since I had a problem with this too, I'll answer it.
This probably happened because you're using find() instead of findOne(). So in the end, you're calling a method for an array of documents instead of a document, resulting in finding an array and not a single document. Using findOne() will let you get access the object normally.
A better way to tackle an issue like this is using doc.toObject() like this
doc.toObject({ getters: true })
other options include:
getters: apply all getters (path and virtual getters)
virtuals: apply virtual getters (can override getters option)
minimize: remove empty objects (defaults to true)
transform: a transform function to apply to the resulting document before returning
depopulate: depopulate any populated paths, replacing them with their original refs (defaults to false)
versionKey: whether to include the version key (defaults to true)
so for example you can say
Model.findOne().exec((err, doc) => {
if (!err) {
doc.toObject({ getters: true })
console.log('doc _id:', doc._id) // or title
}
})
and now it will work
You don't have whitespace or funny characters in ' title', do you? They can be defined if you've quoted identifiers into the object/map definition. For example:
var problem = {
' title': 'Foo',
'content': 'Bar'
};
That might cause console.log(item) to display similar to what you're expecting, but cause your undefined problem when you access the title property without it's preceding space.
I think using 'find' method returns an array of Documents.I tried this and I was able to print the title
for (var i = 0; i < doc.length; i++) {
console.log("iteration " + i);
console.log('ID:' + docs[i]._id);
console.log(docs[i].title);
}
If you only want to get the info without all mongoose benefits, save i.e., you can use .lean() in your query. It will get your info quicker and you'll can use it as an object directly.
https://mongoosejs.com/docs/api.html#query_Query-lean
As says in docs, this is the best to read-only scenarios.
Are you initializing your object?
function MyObject()
{
this.Title = "";
this.Content = "";
}
var myo1 = new MyObject();
If you do not initialize or have not set a title. You will get undefined.
When you make tue query, use .lean() E.g
const order = await Order.findId("84578437").lean()
find returns an array of object , so to access element use indexing, like
doc[0].title