Develop Reference

Javascript Challenge: Loops - Multiple Conditions - stuck and can't figure this out

I did this module on functions and execution context - all questions have gone well but there is one challenge I have spent a lot of time on and still can't figure it out. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you
Challenge question says:
Write a function addingAllTheWeirdStuff which adds the sum of all the odd numbers in array2 to each element under 10 in array1.
Similarly, addingAllTheWeirdStuff should also add the sum of all the even numbers in array2 to those elements over 10 in array1.
BONUS: If any element in array2 is greater than 20, add 1 to every element in array1.
// Uncomment these to check your work!
// console.log(addingAllTheWeirdStuff([1, 3, 5, 17, 15], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5])); // expected log [10, 12, 14, 23, 21]
// console.log(addingAllTheWeirdStuff([1, 3, 5, 17, 15, 1], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 22])); // expected log [11, 13, 15, 46, 44, 11]
// my attempt so far:
function addingAllTheWeirdStuff(array1, array2) {
// ADD CODE HERE
let result = []
for (let i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if (array2[i] > 20) {
result = array1[i] += 1
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if (array2[i] % 2 === 0 && array1[i] > 10) {
result = array1[i] + array2[i]
}
}
for (let i = 0; i < array2.length; i++) {
if (array2[i] % 2 !== 0 && array1[i] < 10) {
result = array1[i] + array2[i]
}
}
return result
}

You can easily achieve this using reduce and map array method, with the ternary operator:
const array1 = [1, 3, 5, 17, 15];
const array2 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
function addingAllTheWeirdStuff(array1, array2) {
const oddSum = array2.reduce((sum, current) => current % 2 ? current + sum : 0 + sum, 0)
const oddEven = array2.reduce((sum, current) => current % 2 == 0 ? current + sum : 0 + sum, 0)
return array1.map(num => num < 10 ? num + oddSum : num + oddEven)
}
console.log(addingAllTheWeirdStuff(array1, array2))

If you break the challenge into smaller pieces, you can deconstruct it better and come up with your solutions.
This is what I did... I will be adding more comments shortly with more explanations
I chose to keep using loops as I assumed this was the point of the challenges (to practice for loops, multiple conditions, etc) - In other words, I chose to not use map / reduce on purpose but if that's allowed, use the answer by #charmful0x as it results in less code :)
// function to get sum of all odd numbers in array
function getSumOfAllOddNumbersInArray( elementArray ){
var sumOfOddNumbers = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < elementArray.length; i++) {
// use remainder operator to find out if element is odd or not
if (elementArray[i] % 2 !== 0 ) {
sumOfOddNumbers += elementArray[i];
}
}
return sumOfOddNumbers;
}
// function to get sum of all EVEN numbers in array
function getSumOfAllEvenNumbersInArray( elementArray ){
var sumOfEvenNumbers = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < elementArray.length; i++) {
// use remainder operator to find out if element is odd or not
if (elementArray[i] % 2 === 0 ) {
sumOfEvenNumbers += elementArray[i];
}
}
return sumOfEvenNumbers;
}
// Return true if there is at least one element in array that is greater than 20
function hasElementOverTwenty( elementArray ){
for (let i = 0; i < elementArray.length; i++) {
if (elementArray[i] > 20 ) {
// no need to keep looping, we found one - exit function
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
function addingAllTheWeirdStuff( firstArray, secondArray ){
var sumOfOddNumbersInArray = getSumOfAllOddNumbersInArray( secondArray );
var sumOfEvenNumbersInArray = getSumOfAllEvenNumbersInArray( secondArray );
var needToAddOne = hasElementOverTwenty( secondArray );
for (let i = 0; i < firstArray.length; i++) {
// Challenge One
if (firstArray[i] < 10) {
firstArray[i] = firstArray[i] + sumOfOddNumbersInArray;
} else if (firstArray[i] > 10) {
// Challenge Two
firstArray[i] = firstArray[i] + sumOfEvenNumbersInArray;
}
// bonus
if( needToAddOne ){
firstArray[i]++;
}
}
return firstArray;
}
// Uncomment these to check your work!
console.log(addingAllTheWeirdStuff([1, 3, 5, 17, 15], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]));
console.log('expected:' + [10, 12, 14, 23, 21] );
console.log(addingAllTheWeirdStuff([1, 3, 5, 17, 15, 1], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 22]));
console.log('expected:' + [11, 13, 15, 46, 44, 11] );
Challenge question says: Write a function addingAllTheWeirdStuff which adds the sum of all the odd numbers in array2 to each element under 10 in array1.
Similarly, addingAllTheWeirdStuff should also add the sum of all the even numbers in array2 to those elements over 10 in array1.
BONUS: If any element in array2 is greater than 20, add 1 to every element in array1.

How to find the largest group of numbers in an array and return them separately in javascript?

How can I make a function that returns only the numbers greater than the number that I entered?
My code here isn't working, and I don't know why.
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var num = Number(prompt('number'));
function findBiggestNumbers(num) {
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > num) {
num = arr[i];
}
}
return num;
// }
console.log(findBiggestNumbers(num));

To work with arrays you could use the filter function, it returns a subset of the array with some condition. So, you can simpley do:
var num = 5; //using 5 as an example
a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var b = a.filter(number => number > num);
You can put this into an function.

You need to create a new empty array and fill it with numbers that are bigger than input value.
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var num = Number(prompt('number'));
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
let biggerThanArray = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > num) {
biggerThanArray.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return biggerThanArray;
}
console.log(FindBiggestNumbers(num));

You can start to understand and do some fun things with functional JS.
Similar to the answer from Daladier Sampaio I've used filter to return an array where each element passes a condition (el > num) in the callback function. (filter, reduce, and map were introduced in ES5 and are very useful array methods and well worth learning how to use.)
In this example, I've passed in - and called - a whole function named greaterThan instead.
greaterThan
1) Accepts an argument - n, the number from the prompt in this case
2) Returns an array - the callback function that will operate on each array element. What's interesting about this function is that it carries a copy of num with it when it returns. A function like this that retains a copy of its outer lexical environment like that is called a closure. Understanding what they are and how they work is a useful JS skill, and one that is often picked up on in JS interviews.
const arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
const num = Number(prompt('number'));
// accepts a number and returns a callback function
// that accepts an array element and
// tests it against the value of `n`
function greaterThan(n) {
return function (el) {
return el > n;
};
}
// calling greater than with our prompted number
// returns that new callback function that checks each
// array element
const out = arr.filter(greaterThan(num));
console.log(out);
Modern JS >= ES6 will allow you to condense the amount of code you have to write using arrow functions. The following one-line code will work in place of the function in the example:
const greaterThan = n => el => el > n;

You could use Array.prototype.filter():
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
return arr.filter(n => n > num);
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var number = Number(prompt("Enter a number"));
console.log(FindBiggestNumbers(number));
The alternative is using a nested if statement inside a for loop like so:
First make a new array:
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
var newArr = [];
}
Then loop through the original array:
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
var newArr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
}
}
And if you find an element of the array greater than the number, add it to the new array:
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
var newArr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > num) {
newArr.push(arr[i]);
}
}
}
Finally, return the new array:
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
var newArr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > num) {
newArr.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return newArr;
}
Demonstration:
function FindBiggestNumbers(num) {
var newArr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] > num) {
newArr.push(arr[i]);
}
}
return newArr;
}
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var number = Number(prompt("Enter a number"));
console.log(FindBiggestNumbers(number));

JavaScript: Writing this solution using higher order functions

I worked on a problem where you are given an array of numbers and a target sum, and it's your job to find a pair of numbers that sum up to the target number. Here was my solution using simple nested for loops:
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
var output = [];
for (var i = 0; i < integers.length; i++) {
for (var j = 0; j < integers.length; j++) {
if (i !== j && integers[i] + integers[j] === target) {
output.push(integers[i], integers[j]);
return output;
}
}
}
return 'not possible';
}
findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 12, 5, 2], 9); // --> [4, 5]
My question is, is there a cleaner way to write this solution using higher order functions (perhaps forEach?)
Here was my attempt to use forEach:
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
var output = [];
integers.forEach(function(firstNum) {
integers.forEach(function(secondNum) {
if (firstNum + secondNum === target) {
output.push(firstNum, secondNum);
}
})
})
if (output === []) {
return 'not possible';
}
return output;
}
findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 12, 5, 2], 9); // --> [ 4, 5, 5, 4 ]
I tried putting a return after the two pushes, but it did not return anything. So instead, I put the return at the very end.
Why won't it return after the initial two pushes? I want it to stop right there, and only push the two numbers. Instead, by putting the return at the end, it pushed 4 numbers. It should be [4,5] but I got something like [4,5,5,4].
Any advice and help would be much appreciated!

Assume we have the following set of numbers, and we must find a subset of 2 numbers whose sum is 9:
Numbers: 4, 5, 6
Your current code iterates both with i and j from 0 to length. This means that the following iterations match the condition:
Indices: 0, 1, 2
Numbers: 4, 5, 6 // (i) (j)
---------------- // ↓ ↓
i j // Numbers[0] + Numbers[1] === 9
j i // Numbers[1] + Numbers[0] === 9
As you can see, the numbers 4 and 5 are matched twice, in 2 iterations:
i === 0 && j === 1
i === 1 && j === 0
You can avoid this by making sure one simple condition is met:
j must at all times be greater than i
This condition can be met met by initializing j with i + 1 in the inner for loop:
for (var i = 0; i < integers.length; i++) {
for (var j = i + 1; j < integers.length; j++) {
// ...
}
}
This way, j can never be 0 when i is 1, because the inner for-loop will run to completion before i is ever incremented once more. Once that happens, a brand new inner for-loop is created, in which j is again set to i + 1. The following diagram is the result:
Indices: 0, 1, 2
Numbers: 4, 5, 6
----------------
i j
X i // ← j can never be 0 if (i === 1),
// so the same set is never evaluated twice.
In other words, only the following combinations for i and j are checked at most:
Indices: 0, 1, 2
----------------
i j
i j
i j
is there a cleaner way to write this solution using higher order functions (perhaps forEach?)
A for loop is actually a fine solution for your use-case. They allow you to break early - after the first time you find a valid pair of numbers. forEach or other array iterator functions on the other hand will always continue until all set indices are visited.
You are actually breaking early in your first example with the statement return output;
When you use forEach on a set of numbers with multiple valid sets, you'll always get back all numbers involved:
Indices: 0, 1, 2, 3
Numbers: 4, 5, 6, 3 // (i) (j)
------------------- // ↓ ↓
i j // Numbers[0] + Numbers[1] === 4 + 5 === 9
i j // Numbers[2] + Numbers[3] === 6 + 3 === 9
forEach, map, reduce and the like do not allow you to break early. The following snippet demonstrates this issue of the diagram above:
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
var output = [];
integers.forEach(function(firstNum, i) {
// slice(i + 1) has the same effect as for (var j = i + 1; ...)
integers.slice(i + 1).forEach(function(secondNum, j) {
if (firstNum + secondNum === target) {
// There is no way here to stop the iteration of either
// forEach call... T_T
output.push(firstNum, secondNum);
}
});
})
if (output.length) {
return output;
}
return 'not possible';
}
console.log(findPairForSum([4, 5, 6, 3], 9)); // --> [4, 5, 6, 3]
This is why I highly recommend sticking with the for loops for this specific use case. With for loop you can simply return as you already did as soon as you encounter a valid set of numbers:
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
for (var i = 0; i < integers.length; i++) {
for (var j = i + 1; j < integers.length; j++) {
if (integers[i] + integers[j] === target) {
return [integers[i], integers[j]];
}
}
}
return 'not possible';
}
console.log(findPairForSum([4, 5, 6, 3], 9)); // --> [4, 5]

This could be your solution:
function findPairForSum(arr, sum) {
var pairs = [];
arr.forEach(n1 => {
var n2 = arr.find(n2 => n1 + n2 == sum)
if (n2) pairs.push([n1, n2]);
});
return pairs;
}
var sums = findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 12, 6, 2], 9);
console.log(sums)

The problem is, you iterate from the start of the array for the inner loop. You could use a copy which starts at the index of the outer loop plus one and exit early on a found value.
But this does not solves the problem with multiple pairs. The result is simply wrong.
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
var output = [];
integers.forEach(function(firstNum, i) {
integers.slice(i + 1).some(function(secondNum) {
if (firstNum + secondNum === target) {
output.push(firstNum, secondNum);
return true;
}
});
});
return output.length && output || 'not possible';
}
// console.log(findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 12, 5, 2], 9));
console.log(findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 4, 12, 5, 2, 4, 5], 9));
For a solution, you need to remember which pairs are used. This approach works with only one loop and a hash table for counting missing values.
If a pair is found, the counter is decremented and the two values are pushed to the result set.
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
var hash = Object.create(null),
output = [];
integers.forEach(function(value) {
if (hash[value]) {
output.push(target - value, value);
hash[value]--;
return;
}
hash[target - value] = (hash[target - value] || 0) + 1;
});
return output.length && output || 'not possible';
}
console.log(findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 4, 12, 5, 2, 4, 5], 9));

This is expected, since you didn't compare the indexes.
This inner array should only loop through the indexes which larger than the outer index.
You can achieve this by using the 2nd parameter, index, in forEach's callback function:
const ints = [3, 34, 4, 12, 5, 6, 2];
function findPairForSum(integers, target) {
let result;
integers.forEach((val1, idx1) => {
integers.forEach((val2, idx2) => {
if (idx1 < idx2 && val1 + val2 === target) {
result = [val1, val2];
}
})
})
return result;
}
console.log(findPairForSum(ints, 9));

Use can reduce your array into another which has sum equals target value:
const ints = [3, 34, 4, 12, 6, 2];
const value = 9;
const resp = ints.reduce((acc, ele, idx, self) => {
let found = self.find(x => x + ele == value)
return found ? [found, ele] : acc;
}, []);
console.log(resp); // [3, 6]

You can use Array.prototype.some which will stop execution as soon as the condition becomes true. See below code.
function findPairForSum(arr, sum) {
var pairs = [];
arr.some(n1 => {
var n2 = arr.find(n2 => n1 + n2 == sum)
if (n2) {
pairs.push(n1, n2); return true;
};
return false;
});
return pairs.length > 0 ? pairs : "not possible";
}
console.log(findPairForSum([3, 34, 4, 12, 7, 2], 9));

Issue trying to find length of sequence in an array

I'm trying to find the length of the sequence in an array, between the first and the second occurance of a specified number.
For Example: lengthOfSequence([0, -3, 7, 4, 0, 3, 7, 9], 7) would return 5, because there are 5 indices between the first and second occurrence of the number 7.
I feel like the code that I have written should work, but after console logging it looks as if my arr.push() method is only pushing the first index to my indexes array variable, and its pushing it twice. Why would this be happening?
Here is my code for context:
var lengthOfSequence = function (arr, n) {
var indexes = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] === n) {
indexes.push(arr.indexOf(arr[i]));
}
}
return arr.indexOf(indexes[1]) - arr.indexOf(indexes[0]);
}
So, for example, if I use my array that I used earlier lengthOfSequence([0, -3, 7, 4, 0, 3, 7, 9], 7), my for loop would find the first occurrence of 7 (index 2) and push it to my index array variable, but it would just do it twice. So my indexes array would just be [2,2]. Why would it not be [2,6]?

indexOf does not do what you think it does. It returns the index of the first item that it finds with the provided value. For both values in the array, it returns that first index.
Since you want the index only and you are already iterating over it with your loop, you can simply use i itself:
indexes.push(i);

You may do it as follows but don't know why it is 5 that you want. I guess it should be 4. OK lets make it 5.
function lengthOfSequence(a,f){
var fi = a.indexOf(f);
return a.slice(fi)
.indexOf(f)+(2*fi+1);
}
var a = [0, -3, 7, 4, 0, 3, 7, 9],
f = 7;
console.log(lengthOfSequence(a,f));

You could use just the index and return the difference between the last element of indices and the first one plus one.
var lengthOfSequence = function(arr, n) {
var indexes = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] === n) {
indexes.push(i);
}
}
return indexes[indexes.length - 1] - indexes[0] + 1;
}
console.log(lengthOfSequence([0, -3, 7, 4, 0, 3, 7, 9], 7)); // 5
console.log(lengthOfSequence([0, -3, 7, 4, 0, 3, 7, 9], -3)); // 1

freecodecamp Challenges- Seek and Destroy

I am trying to solve this challenge Seek and Destroy. I can't figure out what is wrong. Any help ?
Seek and Destroy
You will be provided with an initial array (the first argument in the destroyer function), followed by one or more arguments. Remove all elements from the initial array that are of the same value as these arguments.
This is the initial code below:
function destroyer(arr) {
// Remove all the values
return arr;
}
destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3);
This is my Code below:
function destroyer(arr) {
var letsDestroyThis = [];
var i =1 ; while (i<arguments.length) {
letsDestroyThis.push(arguments[i]);
i++;
}
for(var j=0 ; j< arguments[0].length; j++) {
for (var k= 0; k< letsDestroyThis.length; k++) {
if(arguments[0][j] === letsDestroyThis[k]){
arguments[0].splice(j, 1);
}
}
}
return arguments[0];
}
destroyer([2, 3, 2, 3], 2, 3);
Thanks in Advance!

You can create an array of all values that are supposed to be removed. Then use Array.filter to filter out these values.
Note: Array.splice will change original array.
function destroyer() {
var arr = arguments[0];
var params = [];
// Create array of all elements to be removed
for (var k = 1; k < arguments.length; k++)
params.push(arguments[k]);
// return all not matching values
return arr.filter(function(item) {
return params.indexOf(item) < 0;
});
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

function destroyer(arr) {
/* Put all arguments in an array using spread operator and remove elements
starting from 1 using slice intead of splice so as not to mutate the initial array */
const args = [...arguments].slice(1);
/* Check whether arguments include elements from an array and return all that
do not include(false) */
return arr.filter(el => !args.includes(el));
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

This worked for me:
function destroyer(arr) {
// Remove all the values
var args = Array.from(arguments);
var filter = [];
for (i = 0; i < args[0].length; i++) {
for (j = 1; j < args.length; j++) {
if (args[0][i] === args[j]) {
delete args[0][i];
}
}
}
return args[0].filter(function(x) {
return Boolean(x);
});
}
console.log(
destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3)
);

//two ways of resolving the Seek and Destroy challenge on the FreeCodeCamp
//I was trying to simplify this code, please post your solutions, simplifying the code
//as much has its possible
function destroyer1 (arr){
//get array from arguments
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
args.splice(0,1);
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
for(var j = 0; j < args.length; j++){
if(arr[i]===args[j]){
delete arr[i];
}
}
}
return arr.filter(function(value){
return Boolean(value);
});
}
//--------------------------------------
function destroyer(arr) {
// Remove all the values
//Get values from arguments of the function to an array, index 0(arr[0] will be "arr",
//rest of indexes will be rest of arguments.
var args = Array.from(arguments);
for (var i = 0 ; i < args[0].length; i++){
for (var j = 1; j < args.length; j++){
if(args[0][i] === args[j]){
delete args[0][i];
}
}
}
return args[0].filter(function(value){
return Boolean(value);
});
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));
console.log(destroyer1([1,6,3,9,8,1,1], 3,1));

This is my Code:
function destroyer(arr) {
var argsBeRemove = [...arguments];
argsBeRemove.shift();
return arr.filter(val => {
return argsBeRemove.indexOf(val) == -1;
});
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

Here is my version of Seek and Destroy. I assume that there are no zero elements in input (that assumption allows to pass the challenge). But that way I can make found elements equal zero and then just filter them out. It is pretty straight forward and no index mess when deleting elements in for loops.
function destroyer(arr) {
// Remove all the values
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var temp = [];
temp = arguments[0].slice();
for (j = 1; j < args.length; j++) {
for (i = 0; i < arguments[0].length; i++) {
if (arguments[0][i] == arguments[j]) {
temp[i] = 0;
}
}
}
function isZero(value) {
return value !== 0;
}
var filtered = temp.filter(isZero);
return filtered;
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

function destroyer(arr) {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
return arr.filter(destroyNum);
function destroyNum(element) {
return !args.includes(element);
}
}
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

Give this a shot, it is way less convoluted:
function destroyer(arr) {
// arr1 is equal to the array inside arr
var arr1 = arr.slice(arguments);
// arr2 becomes an array with the arguments 2 & 3
var arr2 = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
// this function compares the two and returns an array with elements not equal to the arguments
return arr1.concat(arr2).filter(function(item) {
return !arr1.includes(item) || !arr2.includes(item)
})
}
destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3);

You will be provided with an initial array (the first argument in the destroyer function), followed by one or more arguments. Remove all elements from the initial array that are of the same value as these arguments.
The accepted solution returns a new array, instead of removing the elements from the existing array.
This can be achieved efficiently by iterating the array in reverse and removing any elements matching any of the filter arguments.
function destroy(original, ...matches) {
if('length' in original) {
let index = original.length
while(--index > -1) {
if(matches.includes(original[index])) {
original.splice(index, 1)
}
}
}
return original;
}
const original = [1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3]
destroy(original, 2, 3)
console.log(original);

My answer is similar to previous one, but I didn't use indexOf. Instead of that I checked the values in cycle, but compiler gives me a warning to not to declare function in cycle.
function destroyer(arr) {
// Remove all the values
var temp = [];
for (var i = 1; i < arguments.length; i++) {
temp.push(arguments[i]);
arr = arguments[0].filter(function(value) {
return ( value !== temp[i - 1]) ;
});
}
return arr;
}
destroyer([1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3);

We can get the arguments behind the array, which are the number required to be removed and store them to a list. Then, we can just use a filter to filter out the numbers that needed to be removed.
function destroyer(arr) {
let removeList=[...arguments].slice(1);
return arr.filter(e=>removeList.indexOf(e)===-1);
}

I know isn't the shortest way to do it, but i think is the more simple to understand in an intermediate level.
function destroyer(arr, ...elements) {
var i =0;
while(i<=arr.length){ //for each element into array
for(let j =0; j<elements.length; j++){ //foreach "elements"
if(arr[i]==elements[j]){ // Compare element arr==element
arr.splice(i,1); //If are equal delete from arr
i--; //Check again the same position
j=0;
break; //Stop for loop
}
}
i++;
}
return arr;
}
console.log(destroyer(["possum", "trollo", 12, "safari", "hotdog", 92, 65, "grandma", "bugati", "trojan", "yacht"], "yacht", "possum", "trollo", "safari", "hotdog", "grandma", "bugati", "trojan"));
console.log(destroyer([1, 2, 3, 5, 1, 2, 3], 2, 3));

function destroyer(arr) {
let newArray = Array.from(arguments).splice(1)
return arr.filter(item => !(newArray.includes(item)))
}