I have 1 API/projects that returns a JSON with
[
{
"id":100,
"name":"some name",
"x": "y"
},
{
"id":200,
"another name",
"x": "z"
}
]
I then have another API/costs call that returns something similar to:
[
{
"projectid":100,
"cost":300
},
{
"projectid":100,
"cost":100
},
{
"projectid":200,
"cost":500
}
]
I currently wrote a mess of ajax/jquery/JS code that builds a JS object with "id", "name", and the summed "cost". And I simply stringify it to a JSON object.
However, the following queries were more complex and it seemed like an inefficient and near impossible way to do through raw JS so I switched to angular services as it would be easier to inject for the front-end team.
I'm not familiar with angular at all, and I only have a simple service that queries all the projects or 1 project given the ID.
Is it possible in Angular to query the API and build a JSON that takes only the name and id from the first query, and sums the cost for the appropriate project in the second query and returns a JSON with:
[
{
"id":100,
"name":"some name",
"cost":400
}
]
[
{
"id":200,
"name":"another name",
"cost":200
}
]
Thanks
This is a solution with plain Javascript and linear complexity.
var project = [{ "id": 100, "name": "some name", "x": "y" }, { "id": 200, name: "another name", "x": "z" }],
cost = [{ "projectid": 100, "cost": 300 }, { "projectid": 100, "cost": 100 }, { "projectid": 200, "cost": 500 }],
merged = function (p, c) {
var o = {},
r = p.map(function (a) {
o[a.id] = { id: a.id, name: a.name, cost: 0 };
return o[a.id];
});
c.forEach(function (a) {
o[a.projectid].cost += a.cost;
});
return r;
}(project, cost);
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(merged, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
Some pseudo-code:
var projects = null;
$http.get('API/projects').then(function(response) {
projects = JSON.parse(response.data);
$http.get('API/costs').then(function(response) {
var costs = JSON.parse(response.data);
projects.forEach(function(project) {
var sum = 0;
costs.forEach(function(cost) {
if (project.id === cost.projectid) {
sum += cost.cost;
}
});
project.cost = sum;
});
};
});
console.log(projects);
Should work with some tweaking.
Could be much more elegant though...
Related
I have the following data :
const data=
{
"1": [
{
"sales_project_id": 5,
"sales_project_name": "name",
"sales_project_est_rev": "123.00",
"project_status": {
"id": 1,
"label": "Start",
"description": null
}
},
{
"sales_project_id": 6,
"sales_project_name": "name2",
"sales_project_est_rev": "123.00",
"project_status": {
"id": 1,
"label": "Start",
"description": null
}
}
],
"2": [],
"4": []
}
These data are grouped in my backend based on their Status , in this case im only showing 2 status , but they are dynamic and can be anything the user defines.
What i wish to do is to transform the above data into the format below :
const data =
{
columns: [
{
id: // id of status here,
title: //label of status here,
cards: [
{
id : //sales_project_id here,
title: //sales_project_name here,
},
]
},
{
id: // id of status here,
title: //label of status here,
cards: [
{
id : //sales_project_id here,
title: //sales_project_name here,
},
]
}
]}
My guess would be to iterate over the data , however i am pretty unfamiliar with doing so , would appreciate someone's help!
Here is what i could come up with so far:
const array = []
Object.keys(a).map(function(keyName, keyIndex) {
a[keyName].forEach(element => {
#creating an object of the columns array here
});
})
after some trial and error , manage to accomplish this , however , im not sure if this is a good method to do so.
Object.keys(projects).map(function(keyName, keyIndex) {
// use keyName to get current key's name
// and a[keyName] to get its value
var project_object = {}
project_object['id'] = projects[keyName][0].id
project_object['title'] = projects[keyName][0].label
project_object['description'] = projects[keyName][0].description
console.log( projects[keyName][1])
var card_array = []
projects[keyName][1].forEach(element => {
var card = {}
card["id"] = element.sales_project_id
card["title"] = element.sales_project_name
card["description"] = element.sales_project_est_rev
card_array.push(card)
});
project_object["cards"] = card_array
array.push(project_object)
})
Im basically manipulating some the scope of the variables inorder to achieve this
See my solution, I use Object.keys like you, then I use reduce:
const newData = { columns: Object.keys(data).map((item) => {
return data[item].reduce((acc,rec) => {
if (typeof acc.id === 'undefined'){
acc = { id: rec.project_status.id, title: rec.project_status.label, ...acc }
}
return {...acc, cards: [...acc.cards, { id:rec.sales_project_id, title:rec.sales_project_name}]}
}, {cards:[]})
})}
See full example in playground: https://jscomplete.com/playground/s510194
I'd just do this. Get the values of data using Object.values(data) and then use reduce to accumulate the desired result
const data=
{
"1": [
{
"sales_project_id": 5,
"sales_project_name": "name",
"sales_project_est_rev": "123.00",
"project_status": {
"id": 1,
"label": "Start",
"description": null
}
},
{
"sales_project_id": 6,
"sales_project_name": "name2",
"sales_project_est_rev": "123.00",
"project_status": {
"id": 1,
"label": "Start",
"description": null
}
}
],
"2": [],
"4": []
};
const a = Object.values(data)
let res =a.reduce((acc, elem)=>{
elem.forEach((x)=>{
var obj = {
id : x.project_status.id,
title : x.project_status.label,
cards : [{
id: x.sales_project_id,
title: x.sales_project_name
}]
}
acc.columns.push(obj);
})
return acc
},{columns: []});
console.log(res)
I can't set up an algo that counts my occurrences while respecting ESlint's 6 standards in javascript.
My input table is :
[
{
"id": 2,
"name": "Health",
"color": "0190fe"
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Agriculture",
"color": "0190fe"
},
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Urban planning",
"color": "0190fe"
},
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Urban planning",
"color": "0190fe"
}
]
And i want to get :
{"Urban planning": 2, "Health": 1, ...}
But that does not work with ESLINT / REACT compilation...
This is my code :
const jsonToIterate = *'MyPreviousInputJson'*
const names = []
jsonToIterate.map(item => (names.push(item.name)))
const count = []
names.forEach(item => {
if (count[item]){
count.push({text: item, value: 1})
} else {
count.forEach(function(top){top.text === item ? top.value =+ 1 : null})
}
})
Thank you so much
Well, you want an object in the end, not an array, so count should be {}. I also wouldn't use map if you're not actually returning anything from the call. You can use reduce for this:
let counts = topicsSort.reduce((p, c, i, a) => {
if (!p.hasOwnProperty(c.name)) p[c.name] = 0;
p[c.name]++;
return p;
}, {});
I'm half exppecting someone to close this as a duplicate because all you've asked for is a frequency counter. But here's an answer anyway:
const jsonToIterate = *'MyPreviousInputJson'*;
const names = {};
jsonToIterate.map(obj => {
if(obj.name in names){
names[obj.name]++
}
else{
names[obj.name] = 1;
}
})
I have a set of data that needs to be reformatted according to a specific format that i desire.
Below is the format of data that I'm receiving.
const recieved = [
{
"name": "1PM Industries IncĀ ",
"series": [
{
"value": 0.0001,
"name": "2019-08-30"
},
{
"value": 0,
"name": "2019-08-28"
}
]
}
]
What i need to do is iterate through all object property keys "name", "series", "value" and change them to "id", "data" , "x" and "y" respectively.
Below is the format of data that i want the above data set to be changed.
I need the "name" to be replaced with "x" and "value" should be replaced with "y"
const columns = [
{
"id": "japan",
"data": [
{
"x": "plane",
"y": 45
},
{
"x": "helicopter",
"y": 253
}
]
}
]
I found out that we can access property keys of objects by Object.keys
function formatData(columns) {
columns.map(col => {
})
}
I find myself in really hard situations when it comes to formatting of data. Hope someone could help me with this. Thanks
This should work:
received.map(r => ({
id: r.name,
data: r.series.map(s => ({
x: s.name,
y: s.value
}))
}));
Map over each received object, return a new object. id of the new object is name of the received object. data of new object is a map of series of old objects converting name to x and value to y.
You could rename the properties (Assigning to new variable names) and generate new objects.
const
recieved = [{ name: "1PM Industries Inc ", series: [{ value: 0.0001, name: "2019-08-30" }, { value: 0, name: "2019-08-28" }] }],
result = recieved.map(({ name: id, series }) => ({
id,
data: series.map(({ value: x, name: y }) => ({ x, y }))
}));
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
You can use map method for this.
const recieved = [
{
"name": "1PM Industries Inc ",
"series": [
{
"value": 0.0001,
"name": "2019-08-30"
},
{
"value": 0,
"name": "2019-08-28"
}
]
}
]
let output = recieved.map(o=>{
let data = o.series.map((i)=>{ return {x: i.value, y: i.name}});
return {id: o.name, data}
});
console.log(output)
you can use for..in loop in conjunction with hasOwnProperty() method
use recursion to have a better script
I have the following Json
var myjson = [{
"files": [
{
"domain": "d",
"units": [
{
"key": "key1",
"type": "2"
},
{
"key": "key2",
"type": "2"
},
{
"key": "key3",
"type": "2"
}]
},
{
"domain": "d1",
"units": [
{
"key": "key11",
"type": "2"
},
{
"key": "key12",
"type": "2"
},
{
"key": "key13",
"type": "2"
}]
}]
},
{
"files": [
{
"domain": "d",
"units": [
{
......
I want to create an new array from this Json array. The length of array will be the number of "units" in this Json object.
So I need to extract "units" and add some data from parent objects.
units: [{
domain: "",
type: "",
key: ""
}, {
domain: "",
type: "",
key: ""
},
{
domain: "",
type: "",
key: ""
}
....
];
I guess i can probably do something like this:
var res = [];
myjson.forEach(function(row) {
row.files.forEach(function(tfile) {
tfile.units.forEach(function(unit) {
var testEntity = {
domain: tfile.domain,
type : unit.type,
key: unit.key
};
res.push(testEntity);
});
});
});
But it is difficult to read and looks not so good. I was thinking to do something like :
var RESULT = myjson.map(function(row) {
return row.files.map(function(tfile) {
return tfile.units.map(function(unit) {
return {
domain: tfile.domain,
type : unit.type,
key: unit.key
};
});
});
});
But This doesn't work and looks not better . Is there any way to do so it works, maybe in more declarative way. hoped Ramda.js could help.
It there any good approach in general to get data from any Nested json in readable way?
Implementing something like:
nestedjson.findAllOnLastlevel(function(item){
return {
key : item.key,
type: type.key,
domain : item.parent.domain}
});
Or somehow flatten this json so all properties from all parents object are moved to leafs children. myjson.flatten("files.units")
jsbin http://jsbin.com/hiqatutino/edit?css,js,console
Many thanks
The function you can use here is Ramda's R.chain function rather than R.map. You can think of R.chain as a way of mapping over a list with a function that returns another list and then flattens the resulting list of lists together.
// get a list of all files
const listOfFiles =
R.chain(R.prop('files'), myjson)
// a function that we can use to add the domain to each unit
const unitsWithDomain =
(domain, units) => R.map(R.assoc('domain', domain), units)
// take the list of files and add the domain to each of its units
const result =
R.chain(file => unitsWithDomain(file.domain, file.units), listOfFiles)
If you wanted to take it a step further then you could also use R.pipeK which helps with composing functions together which behave like R.chain between each of the given functions.
// this creates a function that accepts the `myjson` list
// then passes the list of files to the second function
// returning the list of units for each file with the domain attached
const process = pipeK(prop('files'),
f => map(assoc('domain', f.domain), f.units))
// giving the `myjson` object produces the same result as above
process(myjson)
Pure JS is very sufficient to produce the result in simple one liners. I wouldn't touch any library just for this job. I have two ways to do it here. First one is a chain of reduce.reduce.map and second one is a chain of reduce.map.map. Here is the code;
var myjson = [{"files":[{"domain":"d","units":[{"key":"key1","type":"2"},{"key":"key2","type":"2"},{"key":"key3","type":"2"}]},{"domain":"d1","units":[{"key":"key11","type":"2"},{"key":"key12","type":"2"},{"key":"key13","type":"2"}]}]},{"files":[{"domain":"e","units":[{"key":"key1","type":"2"},{"key":"key2","type":"2"},{"key":"key3","type":"2"}]},{"domain":"e1","units":[{"key":"key11","type":"2"},{"key":"key12","type":"2"},{"key":"key13","type":"2"}]}]}],
units = myjson.reduce((p,c) => c.files.reduce((f,s) => f.concat(s.units.map(e => (e.domain = s.domain,e))) ,p) ,[]);
units2 = myjson.reduce((p,c) => p.concat(...c.files.map(f => f.units.map(e => (e.domain = f.domain,e)))) ,[]);
console.log(units);
console.log(units2);
For ES5 compatibility i would suggest the reduce.reduce.map chain since there is no need for a spread operator. And replace the arrow functions with their conventional counterparts like the one below;
var myjson = [{"files":[{"domain":"d","units":[{"key":"key1","type":"2"},{"key":"key2","type":"2"},{"key":"key3","type":"2"}]},{"domain":"d1","units":[{"key":"key11","type":"2"},{"key":"key12","type":"2"},{"key":"key13","type":"2"}]}]},{"files":[{"domain":"e","units":[{"key":"key1","type":"2"},{"key":"key2","type":"2"},{"key":"key3","type":"2"}]},{"domain":"e1","units":[{"key":"key11","type":"2"},{"key":"key12","type":"2"},{"key":"key13","type":"2"}]}]}],
units = myjson.reduce(function(p,c) {
return c.files.reduce(function(f,s) {
return f.concat(s.units.map(function(e){
e.domain = s.domain;
return e;
}));
},p);
},[]);
console.log(units);
Something like this should work. .reduce is a good one for these kind of situations.
const allUnits = myjson.reduce((acc, anonObj) => {
const units = anonObj.files.map(fileObj => {
return fileObj.units.map(unit => {
return {...unit, domain: fileObj.domain})
})
return [...acc, ...units]
}, [])
Note that this relies on both array spreading and object spreading, which are ES6 features not supported by every platform.
If you can't use ES6, here is an ES5 implementation. Not as pretty, but does the same thing:
var allUnits = myjson.reduce(function (acc, anonObj) {
const units = anonObj.files.map(function(fileObj) {
// for each fileObject, return an array of processed unit objects
// with domain property added from fileObj
return fileObj.units.map(function(unit) {
return {
key: unit.key,
type: unit.type,
domain: fileObj.domain
}
})
})
// for each file array, add unit objects from that array to accumulator array
return acc.concat(units)
}, [])
Try this
var myjson = [{
"files": [{
"domain": "d",
"units": [{
"key": "key1",
"type": "2"
}, {
"key": "key2",
"type": "2"
}, {
"key": "key3",
"type": "2"
}]
},
{
"domain": "d1",
"units": [{
"key": "key11",
"type": "2"
}, {
"key": "key12",
"type": "2"
}, {
"key": "key13",
"type": "2"
}]
}
]
}];
//first filter out properties exluding units
var result = [];
myjson.forEach(function(obj){
obj.files.forEach(function(obj2){
result = result.concat(obj2.units.map(function(unit){
unit.domain = obj2.domain;
return unit;
}));
});
});
console.log(result);
Does Dojo hat any utilities for sotring the data within MemoryStore, or optionally, within any data collection?
I'd need all data from the MemoryStore, but sorted by single evt. more columns. Something like Collections.sort in Java...
I'd expect Store to have sort function, but I couldn't find anything in the documentation.
The dojo/store API allows sorting data at query time only, as far as I know. For example:
var store = new Memory({
data: [{
"firstName": "Bird",
"name": "Schultz"
}, {
"firstName": "Brittany",
"name": "Berg"
}, {
"firstName": "Haley",
"name": "Good"
}, {
"firstName": "Randolph",
"name": "Phillips"
}, {
"firstName": "Bernard",
"name": "Small"
}, {
"firstName": "Leslie",
"name": "Wynn"
}, {
"firstName": "Mercado",
"name": "Singleton"
}, {
"firstName": "Esmeralda",
"name": "Huber"
}, {
"firstName": "Juanita",
"name": "Saunders"
}, {
"firstName": "Beverly",
"name": "Clemons"
}]
});
console.log("Alphabetically by first name:");
store.query({}, {
sort: [{
attribute: "firstName",
descending: false
}]
}).forEach(function(person) {
console.log(person.firstName + " " + person.name);
});
You can provide multiple sort attributes as well.
Full example can be found on JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/9HtT3/
When we sort our Data, we do this actual before the Items are stored. We take the filtered Values that are saved in an array and use array.sort()and called inside a function SortByName or SortByNumbers
looks like this:
function streetsToCombobox(results){
var adress;
var values = [];
var testVals={};
var features = results.features;
require(["dojo/_base/array","dojo/store/Memory","dijit/registry","dojo/domReady!"], function(array,Memory,registry){
if (!features[0]) {
alert(noDataFound);
}
else {
array.forEach(features, function(feature, i){
adress = feature.attributes.STRASSE;
if (!testVals[adress]) {
testVals[adress] = true;
values.push({
name: adress
});
}
});
values.sort(SortByName);
var dataItems = {
identifier: 'name',
label: 'name',
items: values
};
storeStreet = new Memory({
data: dataItems
});
//fill existing Combobox ID,NAME,VALUE,SEARCHATTR,ONCHANGE,STORENAME,COMBOBOX
fillExistingCombobox(
"adrSearchSelectCB",
"adrSearchSelectCBName",
"",
"name",
getAdresses,
storeStreet,
registry.byId("adrSearchSelectCBId")
);
}
});
}
function SortByName(x,y) {
return ((x.name == y.name) ? 0 : ((x.name > y.name) ? 1 : -1 ));
}
Maybe this brings some Ideas to you how to solve your Question.
Regards, Miriam