I have a ng-repeat like this:
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="Ctrl">
{{ctrlTest}}<hr/>
<div ng-repeat="elements in filter">
<div>
<li ng-repeat="(key,value) in filter.producers" ng-show="value">
{{key}}<a ng-click="filter.producers.key=false"> X</a>
</li>
</div>
{{filter.producers}}
</div>
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('Ctrl', function($scope) {
$scope.ctrlTest = "Filters";
$scope.filter = {"producers": {"Ford":true,"Honda":true,"Ferrari":true}}
});
I am trying to make a ng-click that would set each label to false when clicking in a link, but I haven't achieved to do it properly as the key values are not fixed (they should be treated as variables).
So far I have tried it his way.
http://jsfiddle.net/Joe82/wjz8270z/5/
Thanks in advance!
Ps: I cannot change the json structure.
You just need to access the element of object by its key, to ensure that there references would not get lost & binding will work
<li ng-repeat="(key,value) in filter.producers" ng-show="value">
{{key}}<a ng-click="filter.producers[key]=false"> X</a>
</li>
Forked Fiddle
You also call a function and set value false
HTML
<li ng-repeat="(key,value) in filter.producers" ng-show="value">{{key}} {{value}}<a ng-click="setValue(key)"> X</a>
JS
$scope.setValue = function(key){
$scope.filter.producers[key.toString()] = false;
}
see this link http://jsfiddle.net/wjz8270z/8/
Related
I am trying to pass duplicate values in different formats but can not match parent and inner indexes hence I get Error: [ngRepeat:dupes]. that said, I pass object with multiple properties among which I have tags...see below
vm.hotels returns objects like below
0:object
tags:"tag1|tag2|tag3"
1:object
tags:"tag1|tag2|tag3"
vm.hTags is an array that matches each object like below
["tag1", "tag2", "tag3"]
within my controller I split tags and push then into an array within a loop which I pass to the view. this works as it should but I can not make it work with indexes within the view. below are nested ng-repeats
<li ng-repeat="item in vm.hotels track by $index">
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="tag in vm.hTags[$index]">
{{tag}}
</li>
</ul>
<li>
I tried to use vm.hTags[$parent.$index] but it does not work as duplicate error is thrown due to indexes. Perhaps I need to create some custom tracking property ?
The problem with nested ng-repeat is that is that if you use $index for both child and parent, it might conflict. In order to avoid it, we can use it by giving name. Like this
ng-repeat="(hotelIndex, item) in vm.hotels ..."
I don't know how you want to render it but here's a sample example of that:
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
var vm = this;
vm.hotels = [{
tags: "tag1|tag2|tag3"
}, {
tags: "tag4|tag5|tag6"
}]
vm.hTags = [["tag1", "tag2", "tag3"], ["tag4", "tag5", "tag6"]]
})
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<body ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="MainCtrl as vm">
<div ng-repeat="(hotelIndex, item) in vm.hotels track by hotelIndex">
<div ng-repeat="tag in vm.hTags[hotelIndex]">
{{tag}}
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
var vm = this;
vm.hotels = [{
tags: "tag1|tag2|tag3"
}, {
tags: "tag4|tag5|tag6"
}]
vm.hTags = [["tag1", "tag2", "tag3"]];
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.6.3/angular.min.js"></script>
<body ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="MainCtrl as vm">
<div ng-repeat="key in vm.hotels">
<div ng-repeat="tag in vm.hTags[$index]">
{{tag}}
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div ng-repeat="(key, value) in vm.hotels">
<div ng-repeat="tag in vm.hTags[key]">
{{tag}}
</div>
</div>
</body>
Please find the code change below,
<li ng-repeat="item in vm.hotels track by $index">
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="tag in vm.hTags[$index]">
{{tag}}
</li>
</ul>
<li>
Check and let me know.You made a syntax error
I know that if I use the directive ng-repeat, like below, I get every element inside and including the div to repeat on the DOM.
<div class="col col-3" ng-repeat="movie in popular" >
<figure>
<img ng-src="{{movie.backdropURL}}" alt="{{movie.code}}">
<div class="overlay"></div>
<figcaption>{{movie.code}}</figcaption>
<!-- <span class="extra-info">{{movie.extra}}</span> -->
<span class="price">{{movie.price}}</span>
</figure>
</div>
However now I want to have some parent elements that won't repeat but will use the same scope object for their children, that will then repeat.
So, I would like to do a repeater that would append the properties of the scope into their parent, something like this:
<ul class="parent1">
<li><img src={{myScope[0].imgUrl}}></li>
<li><img src={{myScope[1].imgUrl}}></li>
<li><img src={{myScope[2].imgUrl}}></li>
</ul>
<div class="parent2">
<span>{{myScope[0].description}}</span>
<span>{{myScope[1].description}}</span>
<span>{{myScope[2].description}}</span>
</div>
I would like to know if it is possible to reuse a native angular directive (I would prefer not to run the same repeater every time for every parent) where it could append the element to the parent. If not, do you have any suggestion for a solution. I've looked up some links for custom directives I haven't succeeded in applying them. So if you have a 'beginners' custom directive tutorial that could help me go on the right direction, it would be highly appreciated.
I don't know if I understand exactly what you are asking for.
Anyway, the ngRepeat directive is placed in the DOM under a particular parent, so you cannot run it once and append the leaves under different parents. The only way to do that is to create a custom directive that runs a loop internally and sets the leaf under the parent of your choice.
That is:
angular
.module('mymodule')
.directive('mydirective', mydirective);
function mydirective(){
var directive = {
restrict: 'A'
, link: link
}
return directive;
function link($scope, elem, attrs) {
for(var i=0;i<$scope.myScope.length;++i){
var el1 = angular.element('<li><img src='+$scope.myScope[i].imgUrl+'></li>'),
el2 = angular.element('<span>'+$scope.myScope[i].description+'</span>');
elem.find('.parent1').append(el1);
elem.find('.parent2').append(el2);
}
}
}
Please let me know if I misunderstood your goal.
Check this:
HTML:
<div ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="myCtrl">
<ul class="parent1">
<li ng-repeat="item in myScope">
<img ng-src={{item.imgUrl}}>
</li>
</ul>
<div class="parent2">
<p ng-repeat="item in myScope"><span>{{item.description}}</span></p>
</div>
</div>
Controller:
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('myCtrl', ['$scope', function($scope) {
$scope.myScope = [
{imgUrl:"someUrl1", description: "this is first url"},
{imgUrl:"someUrl2", description: "this is second url"}
]
}]);
Acceptable :) ?
I guess it is best to describe it with a picture. I have an angular app and here is a simple view.
Obvious explanation: list shows all the entities, if you click on an entity you can edit it in the form that is hidden by default and similar action applies to adding a new entity.
the issue
I know it is basic example so here the solution might be an overkill but I want to separate the logic of 'Add new entity', 'Edit entity' and 'Entities list'. I thought I could implement it like this:
<div ng-include="'userAddForm.html'"
ng-show="???"
ng-controller="AddUser as add">
</div>
<div ng-include="'userEditForm.html'"
ng-show="???"
ng-controller="AddEdit as edit">
</div>
<div class="panel panel-default">
... list managed by the current controller
</div>
What I miss
I have a difficulty in sharing a state of the hidden parts. For example some boolean flag. For instance:
Click on the entity shows the edit form
Save/Cancel in the edit form hides the part
Then, I think the first step is the responsibility of list-controller, but save/cancel part goes to edit-controller. It would be only possible to share the value with a service included in both - but that does not seem reasonable either.
I think there is some simple solution I can not see and I am open for any advice. Thanks!
If your goal is a simple solution with just a boolean being toggled in the model, you can use child controllers like this:
http://plnkr.co/edit/P1ncToJwqvxt9F9MTF5E?p=preview
The child controllers will inherit the scope of the parent controller and can directly edit the values. I have the edit child controller filtering for editMode==true, so when the parent changes that value, the child controller automatically shows the item. All changes are updated live and the child controller simply toggles the editMode property to remove it from the editing area.
Similar logic is used for the add child controller.
The views look like this:
index.html
<div ng-controller="myCtrl">
<div ng-controller="addCtrl" ng-include="'userAddForm.html'">
</div>
<div ng-controller="editCtrl" ng-include="'userEditForm.html'">
</div>
<h1>Listing</h1>
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="item in items | filter:{addMode:false}">
{{item.id}}
{{item.name}}
<button ng-click="startEditing(item)">[ edit ]</button>
</li>
</ul>
<button ng-click="startAdding()">[ add ]</button>
<div>Debug:<br>{{items}}</div>
</div>
userAddForm.html
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="item in items | filter:{addMode:true}">
<input type="text" ng-model="item.id">
<input type="text" ng-model="item.name">
<button ng-click="add(item)">[ add ]</button>
<button ng-click="cancel(item)">[ cancel ]</button>
</li>
</ul>
userEditForm.html
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="item in items | filter:{editMode:true}">
<input type="text" ng-model="item.id">
<input type="text" ng-model="item.name">
<button ng-click="save(item)">[ save ]</button>
</li>
</ul>
And the controllers look like this:
angular.module('myApp.controllers',[])
.controller('addCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.add = function(item) {
item.addMode = false;
}
$scope.cancel = function(item) {
$scope.items.pop(item);
}
})
.controller('editCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.save = function(item) {
item.editMode = false;
}
})
.controller('myCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.items = [
{name:'aap', id:"1", editMode:false, addMode:false},
{name:'noot', id:"2", editMode:false, addMode:false},
{name:'mies', id:"3", editMode:false, addMode:false},
{name:'zus', id:"4", editMode:false, addMode:false}
];
$scope.startAdding = function(){
$scope.items.push({addMode:true});
};
$scope.startEditing = function(item){
item.editMode = true;
};
});
You can achieve this using Angular state routing.In which you will create state (different views) like -
header
addEntity
editEntity
listEntity
refer https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/wiki/Nested-States-%26-Nested-Views
Sharing state can be implemented by creating a service which is than injected to all interested párties (controllers), service can hold data which controllers can be bound to and display in template. Services in Angular JS are singletons so all the controllers are accesing and mutating shared state.
I have a simple controller defined in my main app.js file, which controls opening/closing of my navbar and is visible on all other views of my app:
app.js:
.controller('mainController', ['$scope', function($scope){
$scope.menuActive = false;
$scope.toggleMenu = function(){
$scope.menuActive = !$scope.menuActive;
}
}]);
index.html:
<nav class="side-menu" ng-class="{ 'side-menu-open' : menuActive }">
<ul>
<li>LINK1</li>
<li>LINK2</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<!--Other views::.....-->
<div ui-view></div>
All my other views(which use controllerAs), have a button with an ng-click which I am using to access the above $scope.toggleMenu() function and ng-class, but this does not work, and I don't get any errors either:
view1.html :
<span class="btn btn-default"
ng-click="toggleMenu()">
MENU
</span>
View1.js:
angular
.module('myApp.view1', [])
.controller('View1Ctrl', [
function(){
................
}
]);
Also, the reason I have done it this way again is because my navbar is persistent throughout my app. Does this go against best practices by any chance?
If you are using the .. controller as .. syntax, make sure that you are using it for all controllers. Don't be selective about it.
Next, when using the syntax, you need not inject the $scope object. You need to instead use the this variable and attach any properties or functions that you would normally associate with the $scope object with the this object instead.
Thus,
$scope.toggleMenu = function(){
$scope.menuActive = !$scope.menuActive;
}
becomes
this.toggleMenu = function(){
this.menuActive = !this.menuActive;
}
Finally in your view, be sure to associate each expression with a controller.
<div ng-controller="mainController as main">
<nav class="side-menu" ng-class="{ 'side-menu-open' : main.menuActive }">
<ul>
<li>LINK1</li>
<li>LINK2</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<div ui-view>
<!-- Assuming that the following gets compiled to ui-view -->
<span class="btn btn-default" ng-click="main.toggleMenu()">
MENU
</span>
</div>
</div>
You can get some further hints on using the controller as syntax here
I am trying to display a binary tree of elements, which I go through recursively with ng-include.
What is the difference between ng-init="item = item.left" and ng-repeat="item in item.left" ?
In this example it behaves exactly the same, but I use similiar code in a project and there it behaves differently. I suppose it's because of Angular scopes.
Maybe I shouldn't use ng-if, please explain me how to do it better.
The pane.html is:
<div ng-if="!isArray(item.left)">
<div ng-repeat="item in [item.left]" ng-include="'Views/pane.html'">
</div>
</div>
<div ng-if="isArray(item.left)">
{{item.left[0]}}
</div>
<div ng-if="!isArray(item.right)">
<div ng-repeat="item in [item.right]" ng-include="'Views/pane.html'">
</div>
</div>
<div ng-if="isArray(item.right)">
{{item.right[0]}}
</div>
<div ng-if="!isArray(item.left)">
<div ng-init = "item = item.left" ng-include="'Views/pane.html'">
</div>
</div>
<div ng-if="isArray(item.left)">
{{item.left[0]}}
</div>
<div ng-if="!isArray(item.right)">
<div ng-init="item = item.right" ng-include="'Views/pane.html'">
</div>
</div>
<div ng-if="isArray(item.right)">
{{item.right[0]}}
</div>
The controller is:
var app = angular.module('mycontrollers', []);
app.controller('MainCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.tree = {
left: {
left: ["leftleft"],
right: {
left: ["leftrightleft"],
right: ["leftrightright"]
}
},
right: {
left: ["rightleft"],
right: ["rightright"]
}
};
$scope.isArray = function (item) {
return Array.isArray(item);
}
});
EDIT:
First I run into the problem that the directive ng-repeat has a greater priority than ng-if. I tried to combine them, which failed. IMO it's strange that ng-repeat dominates ng-if.
It's a little hacky, but I am passing variables to an ng-include with an ng-repeat of an array containing a JSON object :
<div ng-repeat="pass in [{'text':'hello'}]" ng-include="'includepage.html'"></div>
In your include page you can access your variable like this:
<p>{{pass.text}}</p>
Pass parameter to Angular ng-include
You don't need that. all ng-include's sources have the same controller. So each view sees the same data.
What is the difference between ng-init="item = item.left" and ng-repeat="item in item.left"
[1]
ng-init="item = item.left" means - creating new instance named item that equals to item.left. In other words you achieve the same by writing in controller:
$scope.item = $scope.item.left
[2]
ng-repeat="item in item.left" means create list of scopes based on item.left array. You should know that each item in ng-repeat has its private scope
I am trying to display a binary tree of elements, which I go through recursively with ng-include.
I posted in the past answer how to display tree by using ng-include.
It might helpful: how-do-display-a-collapsible-tree
The main part here that you create Node with id wrapped by <scipt> tag and use ng-repeat:
<script type="text/ng-template" id="tree_item_renderer">
<ul class="some" ng-show="data.show">
<li ng-repeat="data in data.nodes" class="parent_li" ng-include="'tree_item_renderer'" tree-node></li>
</ul>
</script>
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="data in displayTree" ng-include="'tree_item_renderer'"></li>
Making a generic directive instead of ng-include is a cleaner solution:
Angular passing scope to ng-include
I am using ng-include with ng-repeat of an array containing string. If you want to send multple data so please see Junus Ergin answer.
See my code Snippet:
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.23/angular.min.js"></script>
<div ng-app="">
<div ng-repeat="name in ['Sanjib Pradhan']" ng-include="'your_template.html'"></div>
<div ng-repeat="name in ['Chinmay Sahu']" ng-include="'your_template.html'"></div>
<script type="text/ng-template" id="your_template.html">
{{name}}
</script>
</div>