I have a blog implementation based on ReactJS that I would like to integrate with AddThis. I have my social icons and I want to use them. So I'm looking for a way to integrate just the AddThis backend service.
I tried looking around but I was not able to find how to integrate AddThis to a ReactJS component.
I saw this somewhere and it uses a special namespace which to the best of my knowledge is not react friendly.
<div addthis:url='blog_url' addthis:title='blog_title' class="addthis_toolbox">
<a class="addthis_button_facebook">
<svg ... />
</a>
<a class="addthis_button_twitter">
<svg ... />
</a>
<a class="addthis_button_linkedin">
<svg ... />
</a>
<a class="addthis_button_reddit">
<svg ... />
</a>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://s7.addthis.com/js/250/addthis_widget.js#pubid=xa-4fc9383e1ee05f1b"></script>
Also, I saw this JSFiddle with some information on it, but it is not using ReactJS and does not use custom icons.
Question: Is there any good documentation around AddThis + React?
In addition to the data attribute changes you should use the addthis.layers.refresh() method to dynamically refresh/load your AddThis components:
render() {
return (
<div className="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"
data-url={this.props.myurl}
data-title="Check out this URL"
>
</div>
);
}
Then in componentDidMount():
componentDidMount() {
addthis.layers.refresh();
}
EDIT: The above method is the initial approach i took and does initialise the add this widget however, the widget seems to not update the data-url when the prop is changed. even if i call addthis.layers.refresh(); again after a props update
Dynamic update solution:
In my render method:
// Don't use data attributes
<div className="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"></div>
Use the lifecycle methods:
componentDidMount() {
addthis.layers.refresh(); // important! init the add this widget
addthis.update('share', 'url', 'my-initial-url'); // update with initial prop value
}
componentDidUpdate() {
addthis.update('share', 'url', this.props.myurl); // update with prop value
}
componentWillReceiveProps(nextProps) {
addthis.update('share', 'url', nextProps.myurl); // update with prop value
}
Replace addthis:url and addthis:title with data-addthis-url and data-addthis-title.
I put this div in to display the addthis buttons.
<div className="addthis_inline_share_toolbox" data-url={ `http://[Your URL]` } data-title={ `[Your Title]` }></div>
But I also needed to load the javascript after the component mounted or the buttons never display. I assume if you add the javascript to your template that it's loading before the share_toolbox is loaded.
componentDidMount() {
setTimeout( () => {
var addthisScript = document.createElement('script');
addthisScript.setAttribute('src', 'http://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=[your id here]')
if (document.body) document.body.appendChild(addthisScript)
});
},
Here is how I did it:
Please, note that I'm using the inline share toolbox.
Thanks #Mark for addthis.update and to #jvoros for react-load-script
import React, { useEffect } from 'react';
import Script from 'react-load-script';
const AddThis = (props) => {
useEffect(() => {
if (window.addthis) {
window.addthis.update('share', 'url', props.url);
}
}, [props.url]);
const handleAddthisLoaded = () => {
window.addthis.init();
window.addthis.update('share', 'url', props.url);
};
return (
<>
<div className="addthis_inline_share_toolbox"></div>
<Script
url="//s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
onLoad={handleAddthisLoaded} />
</>
);
}
export default AddThis;
This was the only info I could find on implementing AddThis in a React app. Eventually helped me get a fix. I am posting my solution for anyone else who comes across this.
Using React Router and AddThis presented some challenges. The key was attaching the addThis javascript methods to window events and not React lifecycle events.
I used react-load-script to asynchronously load the script on the main page of my app, and implemented a callback to initialize the addThis widget and then set state to indicate if addThis was loaded. Then that state gets passed down to the component.
Partial code:
import * as LoadScript from 'react-load-script';
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
this.state = { addThisLoaded: false }
}
handleScriptLoad() {
this.setState({ addthisLoaded: true });
window.addthis.init();
}
render() {
return (
<LoadScript
url="http://s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
onLoad={this.handleScriptLoad.bind(this)}
/>
<Switch>
<Route exact path="/" component={Home} />
<Route path="/page/:id"
render={routeProps => (<Page {...routeProps} addThisLoaded={this.state.addThisLoaded} />)}
/>
</Switch>
);
}
}
Then in the component that implements the addThis widget I attached the window event listeners to the React lifecycle hooks. The addThisLoaded prop can be used to conditionally render the widget.
export default class Page extends React.Component<Props> {
componentDidMount() {
window.addEventListener('load', window.addthis.layers.refresh());
}
componentWillUnmount() {
window.removeEventListener('load', window.addthis.layers.refresh);
}
render() {
const page_url = `YOUR URL GOES HERE`;
const page_title = `YOUR TITLE GOES HERE`;
return (
<div>
{this.props.addThisLoaded === true && (
<div className="addthis_inline_share_toolbox" data-url={page_url} data-title={page_title} />
)}
</div>
);
}
}
If there is a better way to handle it I'd love to hear. The AddThis API docs are sparse. And the fact that it manipulates the DOM to get the desired behavior makes it tricky to incorporate with React Router.
Replace addthis:url with data-url
Related
What's the react way of setting focus on a particular text field after the component is rendered?
Documentation seems to suggest using refs, e.g:
Set ref="nameInput" on my input field in the render function, and then call:
this.refs.nameInput.getInputDOMNode().focus();
But where should I call this? I've tried a few places but I cannot get it to work.
#Dhiraj's answer is correct, and for convenience you can use the autoFocus prop to have an input automatically focus when mounted:
<input autoFocus name=...
Note that in jsx it's autoFocus (capital F) unlike plain old html which is case-insensitive.
You should do it in componentDidMount and refs callback instead. Something like this
componentDidMount(){
this.nameInput.focus();
}
class App extends React.Component{
componentDidMount(){
this.nameInput.focus();
}
render() {
return(
<div>
<input
defaultValue="Won't focus"
/>
<input
ref={(input) => { this.nameInput = input; }}
defaultValue="will focus"
/>
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('app'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.3.1/react.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.3.1/react-dom.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
Focus on mount
If you just want to focus an element when it mounts (initially renders) a simple use of the autoFocus attribute will do.
<input type="text" autoFocus />
Dynamic focus
to control focus dynamically use a general function to hide implementation details from your components.
React 16.8 + Functional component - useFocus hook
const FocusDemo = () => {
const [inputRef, setInputFocus] = useFocus()
return (
<>
<button onClick={setInputFocus} >
Focus
</button>
<input ref={inputRef} />
</>
)
}
const useFocus = () => {
const htmlElRef = useRef(null)
const setFocus = () => {htmlElRef.current && htmlElRef.current.focus()}
return [ htmlElRef, setFocus ]
}
Full Demo
React 16.3 + Class Components - utilizeFocus
class App extends Component {
constructor(props){
super(props)
this.inputFocus = utilizeFocus()
}
render(){
return (
<>
<button onClick={this.inputFocus.setFocus}>
Focus
</button>
<input ref={this.inputFocus.ref}/>
</>
)
}
}
const utilizeFocus = () => {
const ref = React.createRef()
const setFocus = () => {ref.current && ref.current.focus()}
return {setFocus, ref}
}
Full Demo
As of React 0.15, the most concise method is:
<input ref={input => input && input.focus()}/>
If you just want to make autofocus in React, it's simple.
<input autoFocus type="text" />
While if you just want to know where to put that code, answer is in componentDidMount().
v014.3
componentDidMount() {
this.refs.linkInput.focus()
}
In most cases, you can attach a ref to the DOM node and avoid using findDOMNode at all.
Read the API documents here: https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/top-level-api.html#reactdom.finddomnode
React 16.3 added a new convenient way to handle this by creating a ref in component's constructor and use it like below:
class MyForm extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.textInput = React.createRef();
}
componentDidMount() {
this.textInput.current.focus();
}
render() {
return(
<div>
<input ref={this.textInput} />
</div>
);
}
}
For more details about React.createRef, you can check this article in React blog.
Update:
Starting from React 16.8, useRef hook can be used in function components to achieve the same result:
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
const MyForm = () => {
const textInput = useRef(null);
useEffect(() => {
textInput.current.focus();
}, []);
return (
<div>
<input ref={textInput} />
</div>
);
};
The React docs now have a section for this. https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/more-about-refs.html#the-ref-callback-attribute
render: function() {
return (
<TextInput
ref={function(input) {
if (input != null) {
input.focus();
}
}} />
);
},
I just ran into this issue and I'm using react 15.0.1 15.0.2 and I'm using ES6 syntax and didn't quite get what I needed from the other answers since v.15 dropped weeks ago and some of the this.refs properties were deprecated and removed.
In general, what I needed was:
Focus the first input (field) element when the component mounts
Focus the first input (field) element with an error (after submit)
I'm using:
React Container/Presentation Component
Redux
React-Router
Focus the First Input Element
I used autoFocus={true} on the first <input /> on the page so that when the component mounts, it will get focus.
Focus the First Input Element with an Error
This took longer and was more convoluted. I'm keeping out code that isn't relevant to the solution for brevity.
Redux Store / State
I need a global state to know if I should set the focus and to disable it when it was set, so I don't keep re-setting focus when the components re-render (I'll be using componentDidUpdate() to check for setting focus.)
This could be designed as you see fit for you application.
{
form: {
resetFocus: false,
}
}
Container Component
The component will need to have the resetfocus property set and a callBack to clear the property if it ends up setting focus on itself.
Also note, I organized my Action Creators into separate files mostly due to my project is fairly large and I wanted to break them up into more manageable chunks.
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import MyField from '../presentation/MyField';
import ActionCreator from '../actions/action-creators';
function mapStateToProps(state) {
return {
resetFocus: state.form.resetFocus
}
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
clearResetFocus() {
dispatch(ActionCreator.clearResetFocus());
}
}
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(MyField);
Presentation Component
import React, { PropTypes } form 'react';
export default class MyField extends React.Component {
// don't forget to .bind(this)
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this._handleRef = this._handleRef.bind(this);
}
// This is not called on the initial render so
// this._input will be set before this get called
componentDidUpdate() {
if(!this.props.resetFocus) {
return false;
}
if(this.shouldfocus()) {
this._input.focus();
this.props.clearResetFocus();
}
}
// When the component mounts, it will save a
// reference to itself as _input, which we'll
// be able to call in subsequent componentDidUpdate()
// calls if we need to set focus.
_handleRef(c) {
this._input = c;
}
// Whatever logic you need to determine if this
// component should get focus
shouldFocus() {
// ...
}
// pass the _handleRef callback so we can access
// a reference of this element in other component methods
render() {
return (
<input ref={this._handleRef} type="text" />
);
}
}
Myfield.propTypes = {
clearResetFocus: PropTypes.func,
resetFocus: PropTypes.bool
}
Overview
The general idea is that each form field that could have an error and be focused needs to check itself and if it needs to set focus on itself.
There's business logic that needs to happen to determine if the given field is the right field to set focus to. This isn't shown because it will depend on the individual application.
When a form is submitted, that event needs to set the global focus flag resetFocus to true. Then as each component updates itself, it will see that it should check to see if it gets the focus and if it does, dispatch the event to reset focus so other elements don't have to keep checking.
edit
As a side note, I had my business logic in a "utilities" file and I just exported the method and called it within each shouldfocus() method.
Cheers!
This is not longer the best answer. As of v0.13, this.refs may not available until AFTER componentDidMount() runs, in some odd cases.
Just add the autoFocus tag to your input field, as FakeRainBrigand showed above.
Ref. #Dave's comment on #Dhiraj's answer; an alternative is to use the callback functionality of the ref attribute on the element being rendered (after a component first renders):
<input ref={ function(component){ React.findDOMNode(component).focus();} } />
More info
Using React Hooks / Functional components with Typescript, you can use the useRef hook with HTMLInputElement as the generic parameter of useRef:
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
export default function MyComponent(): JSX.Element {
const inputReference = useRef<HTMLInputElement>(null);
useEffect(() => {
inputReference.current?.focus();
}, []);
return (
<div>
<input ref={inputReference} />
</div>
);
}
Or if using reactstrap, supply inputReference to innerRef instead of ref:
import React, { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';
import { Input } from 'reactstrap';
export default function MyComponent(): JSX.Element {
const inputReference = useRef<HTMLInputElement>(null);
useEffect(() => {
inputReference.current?.focus();
}, []);
return (
<div>
<Input innerRef={inputReference} />
</div>
);
}
Note that none of these answers worked for me with a material-ui TextField component. Per How to set focus to a materialUI TextField? I had to jump through some hoops to get this to work:
const focusUsernameInputField = input => {
if (input) {
setTimeout(() => {input.focus()}, 100);
}
};
return (
<TextField
hintText="Username"
floatingLabelText="Username"
ref={focusUsernameInputField}
/>
);
This is the proper way, how to autofocus. When you use callback instead of string as ref value, it is automatically called. You got your ref available than without the need of touching the DOM using getDOMNode
render: function() {
return <TextInput ref={(c) => this._input = c} />;
},
componentDidMount: function() {
this._input.focus();
},
You don't need getInputDOMNode?? in this case...
Just simply get the ref and focus() it when component gets mounted -- componentDidMount...
import React from 'react';
import { render } from 'react-dom';
class myApp extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
this.nameInput.focus();
}
render() {
return(
<div>
<input ref={input => { this.nameInput = input; }} />
</div>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<myApp />, document.getElementById('root'));
You can put that method call inside the render function. Or inside the life cycle method, componentDidUpdate
I have same problem but I have some animation too, so my colleague suggest to use window.requestAnimationFrame
this is ref attribute of my element:
ref={(input) => {input && window.requestAnimationFrame(()=>{input.focus()})}}
AutoFocus worked best for me. I needed to change some text to an input with that text on double click so this is what I ended up with:
<input autoFocus onFocus={this.setCaretToEnd} value={this.state.editTodo.value} onDoubleClick={this.updateTodoItem} />
NOTE: To fix the issue where React places the caret at the beginning of the text use this method:
setCaretToEnd(event) {
var originalText = event.target.value;
event.target.value = '';
event.target.value = originalText;
}
Found here:
https://coderwall.com/p/0iz_zq/how-to-put-focus-at-the-end-of-an-input-with-react-js
<input type="text" autoFocus />
always try the simple and basic solution first, works for me.
To move focus to a newly created element, you can store the element's ID in the state and use it to set autoFocus. e.g.
export default class DefaultRolesPage extends React.Component {
addRole = ev => {
ev.preventDefault();
const roleKey = this.roleKey++;
this::updateState({
focus: {$set: roleKey},
formData: {
roles: {
$push: [{
id: null,
name: '',
permissions: new Set(),
key: roleKey,
}]
}
}
})
}
render() {
const {formData} = this.state;
return (
<GridForm onSubmit={this.submit}>
{formData.roles.map((role, idx) => (
<GridSection key={role.key}>
<GridRow>
<GridCol>
<label>Role</label>
<TextBox value={role.name} onChange={this.roleName(idx)} autoFocus={role.key === this.state.focus}/>
</GridCol>
</GridRow>
</GridSection>
))}
</GridForm>
)
}
}
This way none of the textboxes get focus on page load (like I want), but when you press the "Add" button to create a new record, then that new record gets focus.
Since autoFocus doesn't "run" again unless the component gets remounted, I don't have to bother unsetting this.state.focus (i.e. it won't keep stealing focus back as I update other states).
Simple solution without autofocus:
<input ref={ref => ref && ref.focus()}
onFocus={(e)=>e.currentTarget.setSelectionRange(e.currentTarget.value.length, e.currentTarget.value.length)}
/>
ref triggers focus, and that triggers onFocus to calculate the end and set the cursor accordingly.
Ben Carp solution in typescript
React 16.8 + Functional component - useFocus hook
export const useFocus = (): [React.MutableRefObject<HTMLInputElement>, VoidFunction] => {
const htmlElRef = React.useRef<HTMLInputElement>(null);
const setFocus = React.useCallback(() => {
if (htmlElRef.current) htmlElRef.current.focus();
}, [htmlElRef]);
return React.useMemo(() => [htmlElRef, setFocus], [htmlElRef, setFocus]);
};
Warning: ReactDOMComponent: Do not access .getDOMNode() of a DOM node; instead, use the node directly. This DOM node was rendered by App.
Should be
componentDidMount: function () {
this.refs.nameInput.focus();
}
The simplest answer is add the ref="some name" in the input text element and call the below function.
componentDidMount(){
this.refs.field_name.focus();
}
// here field_name is ref name.
<input type="text" ref="field_name" />
After trying a lot of options above with no success I've found that It was as I was disabling and then enabling the input which caused the focus to be lost.
I had a prop sendingAnswer which would disable the Input while I was polling the backend.
<Input
autoFocus={question}
placeholder={
gettingQuestion ? 'Loading...' : 'Type your answer here...'
}
value={answer}
onChange={event => dispatch(updateAnswer(event.target.value))}
type="text"
autocomplete="off"
name="answer"
// disabled={sendingAnswer} <-- Causing focus to be lost.
/>
Once I removed the disabled prop everything started working again.
Read almost all the answer but didnt see a getRenderedComponent().props.input
Set your text input refs
this.refs.username.getRenderedComponent().props.input.onChange('');
According to the updated syntax, you can use this.myRref.current.focus()
Focus using createRef for functional components
To developers using Functional Components. This seems to suit. Focus happens on inputfield after clicking on the button. I've attached CodeSandbox link too.
import React from 'react';
export default function App() {
const inputRef = React.createRef();
return <>
<input ref={inputRef} type={'text'} />
<button onClick={() => {if (inputRef.current) { inputRef.current.focus() }}} >
Click Here
</button>
</>
}
https://codesandbox.io/s/blazing-http-hfwp9t
That one worked for me:
<input autoFocus={true} />
Updated version you can check here
componentDidMount() {
// Focus to the input as html5 autofocus
this.inputRef.focus();
}
render() {
return <input type="text" ref={(input) => { this.inputRef = input }} />
})
Since there is a lot of reasons for this error I thought that I would also post the problem I was facing. For me, problem was that I rendered my inputs as content of another component.
export default ({ Content }) => {
return (
<div className="container-fluid main_container">
<div className="row">
<div className="col-sm-12 h-100">
<Content /> // I rendered my inputs here
</div>
</div>
</div>
);
}
This is the way I called the above component:
<Component Content={() => {
return (
<input type="text"/>
);
}} />
To keep it simple, the detail page fetches data on mount based on the movie ID in the URL, this coming from path='movie/:id' in the Route.
It's child is called Recommended, which shows you recommended movies based again on the current URL.
class MovieDetailPage extends React.Component {
// Fetch movies and cast based on the ID in the url
componentDidMount() {
this.props.getMovieDetails(this.props.match.params.id)
this.props.getMovieCast(this.props.match.params.id)
}
render() {
<div>
Movies here
</div>
<Recommended id={this.props.match.params.id}/>
}
}
The Recommended component fetches data based on the current movie as well and generates another tag pointing to another movie.
class Recommended extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
this.props.getRecommended(this.props.id)
}
render() {
return (
<>
<Category title={'Recommended'}></Category>
<div className="movies">
{
this.props.recommended.map((movie) => {
return (
<Link key={movie.id} to={`movie/${movie.id}`} className="movies__item">
<img
key={movie.id}
src={`https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w342${movie.poster_path}`}
className="movies__item-img"
alt={`A poster of ${movie.title}`}
>
</img>
</Link>
)
})
}
</div>
</>
)
}
}
Now how can I trigger another render of the parent component when clicking the Link generated in the Recommended component? The URL is changing but this won't trigger a render like I intent to do.
UPDATE:
<Route
path="/movie/:id"
render={(props) => (
<MovieDetailPage key={props.match.params.id}
{...props}
)}
/>
I passed in a unique key this time that triggered the re-render of the page. I tried this before but I might've screwed up the syntax.
This post got me in the right direction: Force remount component when click on the same react router Link multiple times
Add a key to the page
If you change route but your page is not getting its "mount" data then you should add a key to the page. This will cause your page to rerender and mount with the new id and get the data again.
You can read more about react keys here
A key tells react that this is a particular component, this is why you see them in on lists. By changing the key on your page you tell react that this is a new instantiation of the component and has changed. This will cause a remount.
Class component example
class MyPage extends React.Component {
componentDidMound() {
// this will fire each time the key changes since it triggers a mount
}
render() {
return (
<div key={props.pageId}>
{/* component stuff */}
</div>
)
}
}
Functional component example
const MyPage = (props) => {
React.useEffect(() => {
// this will fire each time the key changes
}, []);
return (
<div key={props.pageId}>
{/* component stuff */}
</div>
)
}
You can add another React lifecycle method that triggers on receiving new props (UNSAFE_componentWillReceiveProps, componentDidUpdate, getDerivedStateFromProps) in your Recommended component like this:
UNSAFE_componentWillReceiveProps(nextProps) {
if (nextProps.id !== this.props.id) {
nextProps.getRecommended(nextProps.id);
};
}
You can also add key to your component (which forces it to re-render completely if key changed) like this:
<Recommended key={this.props.match.params.id} id={this.props.match.params.id}/>
You can also use React Hooks to handle this more easily with useEffect:
const Recommended = (props) => {
const { id, getRecommended, recommended } = props;
useEffect(() => {
id && getRecommended(id);
}, [id]);
return (
<>
<Category title={'Recommended'}></Category>
<div className="movies">
{recommended.map((movie) => {
return (
<Link key={movie.id} to={`movie/${movie.id}`} className="movies__item">
<img
key={movie.id}
src={`https://image.tmdb.org/t/p/w342${movie.poster_path}`}
className="movies__item-img"
alt={`A poster of ${movie.title}`}
></img>
</Link>
);
})}
</div>
</>
);
};
Note: adding key to component and complete its re-render is not best practice and you should be using Component's lifecycles to avoid it if possible
Alright, I'm going to do my best to explain how my project is setup so that you can appropriately aid me on my quest to figure out how to approach this configuration.
I have a parent component that is a smart component. Through this component all my data from my store is being accessed.
class DashboardPage extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
this.props.getTips();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<div className="row">
<div className="col-sm-7">
<ContentBox
title="The Scoop"
footerText="Submit a Story"
showSlider
content={<TipOfTheDay tips={this.props.tips} />}
/>
</div>
</div>
</div>
)
}
}
DashboardPage.propTypes = {
getTips: PropTypes.func
}
function mapStateToProps(state, ownProps) {
tips: state.tips
}
function mapDispatchToProps(dispatch) {
return {
getTips: () => { dispatch(tipActions.loadTips());} ## This hits tipActions and runs the `action creator`: loadTips(). Which returns all tips from api.
}
}
export default connect(mapStateToProps, mapDispatchToProps)(DashboardPage);
As you can see, I have included two dumb components inside my smart component, <ContentBox/> & <TipOfTheDay/>. On the dashboardPage there are about 7 <ContentBox/> components, each inheriting special a title for the header/footer and also being told whether or not to display the footer through the showSlider boolean. Here is what <ContentBox/> looks like:
import React, {PropTypes} from 'react';
import Footer from './ContentBoxFooter';
const ContentBox = ({title, footerText, showSlider, content}) => {
return (
<div style={styles.root} className="col-sm-12">
<div style={styles.header} className="row">
<h3 style={styles.header.title}>{title}</h3>
<span style={styles.header.arrow} />
</div>
{content}
<Footer footerText={footerText} showSlider={showSlider} />
</div>
);
};
ContentBox.propTypes = {
title: PropTypes.string,
footerText: PropTypes.string,
showSlider: PropTypes.bool,
content: PropTypes.object
};
export default ContentBox;
And here is the footer:
import React, {PropTypes} from 'react';
import styles from './contentBoxStyles';
import Previous from './svg/Previous';
import Next from './svg/Next';
import Add from './svg/Add';
import consts from '../../styles/consts';
const ContentBoxFooter = ({footerText, showSlider}) => {
if (footerText != undefined) {
return (
<div style={styles.footer} className="row">
{
showSlider ?
<div>
<Previous fillColor={consts.orange} height="20px" width="20px"/>
<span style={styles.bar}>|</span>
<Next fillColor={consts.orange} width="20px" height="20px"/>
</div> : <div style={styles.emptyArrow} />
}
<div style={styles.footer.link}>
<span style={styles.footer.link.text}>{footerText}</span>
<Add fillColor={consts.orange} height="24px" width="24px" />
</div>
</div>
);
} else {
return(null);
}
};
ContentBoxFooter.propTypes = {
footerText: PropTypes.string,
showSlider: PropTypes.bool
};
export default ContentBoxFooter;
Few! So here is where I need to add the onClick functionality. This functionality needs to be added to the <Previous/> & <Next/> component that is an SVG. What I am attempting to do is create a slider for the tips that I have pulled in. Obviously there will be <Footer/> components that will need the same functionality, but controlling different data other than the tips. Because I am new to React & Redux, I am not sure how I can perform this and not just do it, but do it in the 'Redux` way.
How do I get these two svg components that are nested within other dumb components that are dumb components, to perform onClick functions for specific data on the page? I hope this made sense. For more clarity, here is what I am doing with the <TipOfTheDay/> component:
const tipOfTheDay = ({tips}) => {
return (
<div style={styles.tipBody} className="row">
{
tips.map(function(tip, key) {
return (
<div key={key} className="myTips">
<h3 style={styles.tipBody.header}>{tip.title}</h3>
<p style={styles.tipBody.content}>{tip.content}</p>
</div>
);
})
}
</div>
);
};
tipOfTheDay.propTypes = {
tips: PropTypes.array.isRequired
};
export default tipOfTheDay;
Thank you for anytime you spend reading/responded/assisting with this question. I am a fairly new developer and this is also new technology to me.
I'm not sure how you've implemented your Next and Previous Components, but since you've using React-Redux, you can create extra Containers to wrap those components and pass in a Redux Action to them, e.g.:
// PreviousComponent.jsx
var Previous React.createClass({
propTypes: {
goToPrevious: React.PropTypes.func,
},
render: function() {
return (
<div onClick={this.props.goToPrevious}>
...
</div>
);
}
};
export default Previous;
//PreviousContainer.jsx
import ReactRedux from 'react-redux';
import Previous from './PreviousComponent';
var mapStateToProps = (state, props) => {
return {};
};
var mapDispatchToProps = (dispatch) => {
return {
goToPrevious: () => {
dispatch(Actions.goToPrevious());
},
}
};
var PreviousContainer = ReactRedux.connect(
mapStateToProps,
mapDispatchToProps
)(Previous);
export default PreviousContainer;
By adding a container wrapper directly around your component, you can connect a redux action for going to the previous image/slide/whatever directly into your React component. Then, when you want to use the action in your ContentBoxFooter, you import the PreviousContainer and place it where you want the Previous component, e.g.:
//ContentBoxFooter.jsx
import PreviousContainer from './PreviousContainer'
const ContentBoxFooter = ({footerText, showSlider}) => {
if (footerText != undefined) {
return (
<div style={styles.footer} className="row">
{
showSlider ?
<div>
/*
* Add the PreviousContainer here where before you were only using your regular Previous component.
*/
<PreviousContainer fillColor={consts.orange} height="20px" width="20px"/>
<span style={styles.bar}>|</span>
<Next fillColor={consts.orange} width="20px" height="20px"/>
</div> : <div style={styles.emptyArrow} />
}
<div style={styles.footer.link}>
<span style={styles.footer.link.text}>{footerText}</span>
<Add fillColor={consts.orange} height="24px" width="24px" />
</div>
</div>
);
} else {
return(null);
}
};
ContentBoxFooter.propTypes = {
footerText: PropTypes.string,
showSlider: PropTypes.bool
};
By wrapping both the Next and Previous components in containers that pass actions into them, you can connect the Redux actions directly into your components without having to pass them from the root component of your application. Also, doing this allows you to isolate where certain actions are called. Your Previous button is probably the only component that would want to call a Previous action, so by placing it in a Container wrapper around the component, you're making sure that the Previous action is only used where it is needed.
Edit:
If you have to deal with multiple actions, it is better to define them at a higher level. In this case, since the ContentBox is the common breaking point, I would define separate Previous actions for each type of content box and pass them into each ContentBox instance:
var DashboardApp = React.createClass({
propTypes: {
TipsPrevious: React.PropTypes.function,
NewsPrevious: React.PropTypes.function,
},
render: function() {
<div>
<ContentBox
previousAction={this.props.TipsPrevious}
contentType='Tips'
/>
<ContentBox
previousAction={this.props.NewsPrevious}
contentType='News'
/>
...
</div>
},
});
Pass the actions down through the child components until you reach the Previous component and then attach the action to an 'onClick' handler on the Previous component.
The idea here behind this is that you want to limit the scope of parameters to the least amount of code possible. For example, if you added a profile component showing your user information on the page, you might want to add a container around that component and pass in the User-related information/actions without passing the information to the rest of your application. By doing this, it makes it easier to focus information where it is needed. It also helps you figure out where some change/action is taking place in your code if you have to fix a bug.
In the example above, if the Dashboard component is your root component, you'll just pass the Redux Actions into through a container wrapping it. However, if your dashboard component is a nested component itself, pass the actions into it through a custom container so that the actions aren't spread to code that don't need to see it:
<AppRoot>
<PageHeader/>
<DashboardContainer />
<PageSidebar />
<PageFooter />
</AppRoot>
I am attempting to keep with best practices, while adhering to the documentation. Without creating to many one-off methods to handle things for a maintainability standpoint.
Anyway all in all, I am trying to achieve a state between sibling elements that is in sorts an "active" state visually at the least. With something like jQuery I would simply do..
$(document).on('.nav-component', 'click', function(e) {
$('.nav-component').removeClass('active');
$(this).addClass('active');
});
However in react, each component in it of itself is independent of the next and previous, and should remain as such per the documents.
That said, when I am handling a click event for a component I can successfully give it a state of active and inactive, toggling it on and off respectively. But I end up in a place where I have multiple "active" elements when I don't need them as such.
This is for setting up a navigation of sorts. So I want the one in use at the moment to have that active class while the rest won't
I use an app.store with reflux to set state for multiple pages/components. You can do the same passing state up to a common component but using the flux pattern is cleaner.
class AppCtrlRender extends Component {
render() {
let page = this.state.appState.currentPage;
let hideAbout = (page != 'about');
let hideHome = (page != 'home');
return (
<div id='AppCtrlSty' style={AppCtrlSty}>
<div id='allPageSty' style={allPageSty}>
<AboutPage hide={hideAbout} />
<HomePage hide={hideHome} />
</div>
</div>
);
}
}
let getState = function() { return {appState: AppStore.getAppState(),}; };
export default class AppCtrl extends AppCtrlRender {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = getState();
}
componentDidMount = () => { this.unsubscribe = AppStore.listen(this.storeDidChange); }
componentWillUnmount = () => { this.unsubscribe(); }
storeDidChange = () => { this.setState(getState()); }
}
In the page/component check for this.props.hide.
export default class AboutPage extends Component {
render() {
if (this.props.hide) return null;
return (
<div style={AboutPageSty}>
React 1.4 ReFlux used for app state. This is the About Page.
<NavMenu />
</div>
);
}
}
Siblings needing to share some sort of state in React is usually a clue that you need to pull state further up the component hierarchy and have a common parent manage it (or pull it out into a state management solution such as Redux).
For sibling components where only one can be active at a time, the key piece of state you need is something which lets you identify which one is currently active and either:
pass that state to each component as a prop (so the component itself can check if it's currently active - e.g. if each item has an associated id, store the id of the currently active one in a parent component and pass it to each of them as an activeId prop)
e.g.:
var Nav1 = React.createClass({
getInitialState() {
return {activeId: null}
},
handleChange(activeId) {
this.setState({activeId})
},
render() {
return <div className="Nav">
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<NavItem
activeId={this.state.activeId}
item={item}
onClick={this.handleChange}
/>
)}
</div>
}
})
or use it to derive a new prop which is passed to each component (such as an active prop to tell each component whether or not it's currently active - e.g. in the id example above, check the id of each component while rendering it: active={activeId === someObj.id})
e.g.:
var Nav2 = React.createClass({
// ... rest as per Nav1...
render() {
return <div className="Nav">
{this.props.items.map(item =>
<NavItem
active={this.state.activeId === item.id}
item={item}
onClick={this.handleChange}
/>
)}
</div>
}
})
The trick with React is to think of your UI in terms of the state you need to render if from scratch (as if you were rendering on the server), instead of thinking in terms of individual DOM changes needed to make the UI reflect state changes (as in your jQuery example), as React handles making those individual DOM changes for you based on complete renderings from two different states.
I'm checking out React.js and trying to figure out how this library can work together with Isotope.js.
The documentation of React says that it plays nicely with other libraries, but using it with library that changes DOM on its own seems like no sense of using React.
Can someone explain to me, how can I take advantage of React in my webapp that uses Isotope.js as layout ?
My solution with useRef, useState and useEffect hooks. It also works with dynamically generated filter keys and items. The trick is to initialize Isotope after the component is mounted and call its "arrange" method every time the filter keyword changes.
Demo: https://codepen.io/ilovepku/pen/zYYKaYy
const IsotopeReact = () => {
// init one ref to store the future isotope object
const isotope = React.useRef()
// store the filter keyword in a state
const [filterKey, setFilterKey] = React.useState('*')
// initialize an Isotope object with configs
React.useEffect(() => {
isotope.current = new Isotope('.filter-container', {
itemSelector: '.filter-item',
layoutMode: 'fitRows',
})
// cleanup
return () => isotope.current.destroy()
}, [])
// handling filter key change
React.useEffect(() => {
filterKey === '*'
? isotope.current.arrange({filter: `*`})
: isotope.current.arrange({filter: `.${filterKey}`})
}, [filterKey])
const handleFilterKeyChange = key => () => setFilterKey(key)
return (
<>
<ul>
<li onClick={handleFilterKeyChange('*')}>Show Both</li>
<li onClick={handleFilterKeyChange('vege')}>Show Veges</li>
<li onClick={handleFilterKeyChange('fruit')}>Show Fruits</li>
</ul>
<hr />
<ul className="filter-container">
<div className="filter-item vege">
<span>Cucumber</span>
</div>
<div className="filter-item fruit">
<span>Apple</span>
</div>
<div className="filter-item fruit">
<span>Orange</span>
</div>
<div className="filter-item fruit vege">
<span>Tomato</span>
</div>
</ul>
</>
)
}
UPDATE (17/11/21):
TypeScript Demo: https://codesandbox.io/s/react-isotope-typescript-i9x5v
Don't forget to also add #types/isotope-layout as a dev dependency.
Here's a working version with Masonry, you should find it easy enough to port to Isotope (or use Masonry :)) http://jsfiddle.net/emy7x0dc/1/.
Here's the crux of the code that makes it work (and allow React to do its job).
var Grid = React.createClass({
displayName: 'Grid',
getInitialState: function(){
return {
masonry: null
}
},
// Wrapper to layout child elements passed in
render: function () {
var children = this.props.children;
return (
<div className="grid">
{children}
</div>
);
},
// When the DOM is rendered, let Masonry know what's changed
componentDidUpdate: function() {
if(this.state.masonry) {
this.state.masonry.reloadItems();
this.state.masonry.layout();
}
},
// Set up Masonry
componentDidMount: function() {
var container = this.getDOMNode();
if(!this.state.masonry) {
this.setState({
masonry: new Masonry( container )
});
} else {
this.state.masonry.reloadItems();
}
}
});
Here's an updated version of the above code posted by James:
import React, { PureComponent } from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import Isotope from 'isotope-layout';
// Container for isotope grid
class ItemGrid extends PureComponent {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { isotope: null };
}
render() {
return(
<div className="item-grid">
{this.props.children}
</div>
)
}
// set up isotope
componentDidMount() {
const node = ReactDOM.findDOMNode(this);
if (!this.state.isotope) {
this.setState({
isotope: new Isotope( node )
});
} else {
this.state.isotope.reloadItems();
}
}
// update isotope layout
componentDidUpdate() {
if (this.state.isotope) {
this.state.isotope.reloadItems();
this.state.isotope.layout();
}
}
}
export default ItemGrid;
Usage:
Just pass the items you want to keep inside isotope into the ItemGrid component as children:
<ItemGrid>
{data.map(object => (
<Item key={object._id} name={object.name} imageUrl={object.imageUrl} />
))}
</ItemGrid>
Alternatives
If you can, consider using react-masonry-component.
You can manipulate the dom directly inside React. This permits to integrate existing JS libraries or for custom needs not handled well by React.
You can find an exemple here:
https://github.com/stample/gulp-browserify-react-phonegap-starter/blob/master/src/js/home/homeComponents.jsx#L22
And here's what it looks like:
The problem with integration of React and a library like Isotope is that you will end up having 2 different libraries trying to update the same dom subtree. As React work with diffs, it kind of assumes that it is alone modyfing the dom.
So the idea could be to create a React component that will render only one time, and will never update itself. You can ensure this with:
shouldComponentUpdate: function() {
return false;
}
With this you can:
Use React to generate your isotope item html elements (you can also create them without React)
On componentDidMount, initialize isotope on the dom node mounted by React
And that's all. Now React will never update this part of the dom again, and Isotope is free to manipulate it like it wants to without interfering with React.
In addition, as far as I understand, Isotope is not intented to be used with a dynamic list of items so it makes sense to have a React component that never updates.
Updated Hubert's answer to modern react with Hooks.
import React, { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react';
import Isotope from 'isotope-layout';
function IsoContainer (props) {
const isoRef = useRef();
const [isotope, setIsotope] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
if (isotope)
isotope.reloadItems();
else
setIsotope(new Isotope( isoRef.current ));
})
return (
<div ref={isoRef}>
{props.children}
</div>
)
}
export default IsoContainer
Edit: Coming back to Isotope after not using for a few months. Using a container component as above isn't the best practice for isotope. There are functions that exist on the isotope object that are needed, you also need to set the option in the new Isotope(ref, options) function, AND if you need to style the div, it's a little awkward to come back to this component.
It seems a better practice is to instead place the code within this component, into any component you are using isotope in. This way you a) have easy access to the isotope object, b) you can more easily style the container Div, and c) you can more easily pass and edit the isotope options.
You can of course keep the container as it is, though it becomes necessary to lift the state up, making this component a little unnecessary.
You need to create new Isotope object on componentDidMount and reload items on componentDidUpdate.
Use my mixin to figure it out :)
I got Isotope working in React by following Amith's quick tutorial at this link. The key was to address filtering within the onClick function:
class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.onFilterChange = this.onFilterChange.bind(this);
}
// Click Function
onFilterChange = (newFilter) => {
if (this.iso === undefined) {
this.iso = new Isotope('#filter-container', {
itemSelector: '.filter-item',
layoutMode: "fitRows"
});
}
if(newFilter === '*') {
this.iso.arrange({ filter: `*` });
} else {
this.iso.arrange({ filter: `.${newFilter}` });
}
}
render() {
return(
// Filter Buttons
<ul id="portfolio-flters">
<li data-filter="*" onClick={() => {this.onFilterChange("*")}}>All</li>
<li data-filter="filter-one" onClick={() => {this.onFilterChange("filter-one")}}>One</li>
<li data-filter="filter-two" onClick={() => {this.onFilterChange("filter-two")}}>Two</li>
</ul>
// Isotope Grid & items
<div id="filter-container">
<div className='filter-item filter-one'>
// Item Content
</div>
<div className='filter-item filter-two'>
// Item Content
</div>
</div>
)
}
}
It now works exactly like it did on my static jQuery site. If you want the filter buttons to change appearance when active you can simply update local state in the onFilterChange function and render the buttons based on that.
I don't know how but this doesn't work for me. But if I don't use the map function and use data manually this works.
import React, {useEffect, useState, useRef} from 'react';
import options from "./Options"
import ReactDom from 'react-dom'
import Isotope from 'isotope-layout';
import ItemGrid from "./ItemGrid";
const Home = () => {
const [question, setQuestion] = useState();
const [options, setOptions] = useState([]);
// store the isotope object in one state
const [isotope, setIsotope] = React.useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
Axios.get("http://localhost:8080/laravel/voting/public/api/question/3").then((res)=>{
console.log(res.data)
setQuestion(res.data.question);
setOptions(res.data.option)
});
}, []);
useEffect(() => {
setIsotope(
new Isotope(".filter-container", {
itemSelector: ".filter-item",
layoutMode: "vertical",
getSortData : {number: '.number parseInt'}
})
);
}, []);
const changeStateLevel = ()=>{
isotope.arrange({ sortBy: "number" });
}
return (
<>
<div className="row">
<div className="col-sm-7">
<div className="col-sm-14 mb-sm-5" >
<hr />
<ul className="filter-container">
{
options.map(object=>(
<div className="filter-item vege">
<p className="number">{object.vote}</p>
<span>Cucumber</span>
</div>
))
}
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div className="col-sm-5">
</div>
<button className="btn btn-primary" onClick={changeStateLevel}> Change</button>
</div>
</>
);
}
export default Home;