I have a controller:
function myController($scope) {
$scope.clicked = false;
}
and a directive:
function myDirective() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
elem.bind('click', function() {
// need to update controller $scope.clicked value
});
},
template: '<div>click me</div>';
replace: true;
}
}
and I´m using it like this:
<div ng-controller="myController">
<my-directive></my-directive>
</div>
How can I change the controller value of $scope.clicked ?
thanks!
As you don't use isolated scope in your directive, you can use scope.$parent.clicked to access the parent scope property.
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
elem.bind('click', function() {
scope.$parent.clicked = ...
});
},
I would not recommend using scope.$parent to update or access the parent scope values, you can two way bind the controller variable that needs to be updated into your directive, so your directive becomes:
function myDirective() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
clicked: '='
},
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
elem.bind('click', function() {
// need to update controller $scope.clicked value
$scope.clicked = !$scope.clicked;
});
},
template: '<div>click me</div>';
replace: true;
}
}
now pass this clicked from parent:
<div ng-controller="myController as parentVm">
<my-directive clicked="parentVm.clicked"></my-directive>
</div>
function myController() {
var parentVm = this;
parentVm.clicked = false;
}
I would recommend reading up on using controllerAs syntax for your controller as that would really solidify the concept of using two way binding here.
I like to use $scope.$emit for such purposes. It allows to send data from directive to the controller.
You should create custom listener in your controller:
$scope.$on('cliked-from-directive', function(event, data){
console.log(data)
})
As you can see, now you have full access to your controller scope and you can do whatever you want. And in your directive just to use scope.$emit
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
elem.bind('click', function() {
scope.$emit('cliked-from-directive', {a:10})
});
Here I've created jsfiddle for you
Related
I have an Angular 1.3 module that looks something like this (directive that requires the presence of a parent directive, using controllerAs):
angular.module('fooModule', [])
.controller('FooController', function ($scope) {
this.doSomething = function () {
// Accessing parentDirectiveCtrl via $scope
$scope.parentDirectiveCtrl();
};
})
.directive('fooDirective', function () {
return {
// Passing in parentDirectiveCtrl into $scope here
link: function link(scope, element, attrs, parentDirectiveCtrl) {
scope.parentDirectiveCtrl = parentDirectiveCtrl;
},
controller: 'FooController',
controllerAs: 'controller',
bindToController: true,
require: '^parentDirective'
};
});
Here I'm just using $scope to pass through parentDirectiveCtrl, which seems a little clunky.
Is there another way to access the require-ed controller from the directive's controller without the linking function?
You must use the link function to acquire the require-ed controllers, but you don't need to use the scope to pass the reference of the controller to your own. Instead, pass it directly to your own controller:
.directive('fooDirective', function () {
return {
require: ["fooDirective", "^parentDirective"],
link: function link(scope, element, attrs, ctrls) {
var me = ctrls[0],
parent = ctrls[1];
me.parent = parent;
},
controller: function(){...},
};
});
Be careful, though, since the controller runs prior to link, so within the controller this.parent is undefined, until after the link function runs. If you need to know exactly when that happens, you can always use a controller function to pass the parentDirective controller to:
link: function link(scope, element, attrs, ctrls) {
//...
me.registerParent(parent);
},
controller: function(){
this.registerParent = function(parent){
//...
}
}
There is a way to avoid using $scope to access parent controller, but you have to use link function.
Angular's documentation says:
Require
Require another directive and inject its controller as the fourth
argument to the linking function...
Option 1
Since controllerAs creates namespace in scope of your controller, you can access this namespace inside your link function and put required controller directly on controller of childDirective instead of using $scope. Then the code will look like this.
angular.module('app', []).
controller('parentController', function() {
this.doSomething = function() {
alert('parent');
};
}).
controller('childController', function() {
this.click = function() {
this.parentDirectiveCtrl.doSomething();
}
}).
directive('parentDirective', function() {
return {
controller: 'parentController'
}
}).
directive('childDirective', function() {
return {
template: '<button ng-click="controller.click()">Click me</button>',
link: function link(scope, element, attrs, parentDirectiveCtrl) {
scope.controller.parentDirectiveCtrl = parentDirectiveCtrl;
},
controller: 'childController',
controllerAs: 'controller',
bindToController: true,
require: '^parentDirective'
}
});
Plunker:
http://plnkr.co/edit/YwakJATaeuvUV2RBDTGr?p=preview
Option 2
I usually don't use controllers in my directives at all and share functionality via services. If you don't need to mess with isolated scopes of parent and child directives, simply inject the same service to both of them and put all functionality to service.
angular.module('app', []).
service('srv', function() {
this.value = '';
this.doSomething = function(source) {
this.value = source;
}
}).
directive('parentDirective', ['srv', function(srv) {
return {
template: '<div>' +
'<span ng-click="srv.doSomething(\'parent\')">Parent {{srv.value}}</span>' +
'<span ng-transclude></span>' +
'</div>',
transclude: true,
link: function(scope) { scope.srv = srv; }
};
}]).
directive('childDirective', ['srv', function(srv) {
return {
template: '<button ng-click="srv.doSomething(\'child\')">Click me</button>',
link: function link(scope) { scope.srv = srv; }
}
}]);
Plunker
http://plnkr.co/edit/R4zrXz2DBzyOuhugRU5U?p=preview
Good question! Angular lets you pass "parent" controller. You already have it as a parameter on your link function. It is the fourth parameter. I named it ctrl for simplicity. You do not need the scope.parentDirectiveCtrl=parentDirectiveCtrl line that you have.
.directive('fooDirective', function () {
return {
// Passing in parentDirectiveCtrl into $scope here
link: function link(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
// What you had here is not required.
},
controller: 'FooController',
controllerAs: 'controller',
bindToController: true,
require: '^parentDirective'};});
Now on your parent controller you have
this.doSomething=function().
You can access this doSomething as
ctrl.doSomething().
I want to create a component that displays itself as a collapsible box.
When it is expanded, it should show the transcluded content; when it is collapsed it should only show its label.
myApp.directive('collapsingBox', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
require: '^ngModel',
scope: {
ngModel: '='
},
template: '<div ng-controller="CollapseController" class="collapsingBox"><div class="label">Title: {{ ngModel.title }}</div><br/><div ng-transclude ng-show="expanded">Test</div></div>',
link: function($scope, element, attr) {
element.bind('click', function() {
alert('Clicked!');
$scope.toggle();
});
}
};
});
This component should be reusable and nestable, so I wanted to manage the values (like "title" and "expanded") in a controller that gets instantiated for every use of the directive:
myApp.controller('CollapseController', ['$scope', function($scope) {
$scope.expanded = true;
$scope.toggle = function() {
$scope.expanded = !$scope.expanded;
};
}]);
This "almost" seems to work:
http://plnkr.co/edit/pyYV0MAikXThvMO8BF69
The only thing that does not work seems to be accessing the controller's scope from the event handler bound during linking.
link: function($scope, element, attr) {
element.bind('click', function() {
alert('Clicked!');
$scope.toggle(); // this is an error -- toggle is not found in scope
});
}
Is this the correct (usual?) way to create one instance of the controller per use of the directive?
How can I access the toggle-Function from the handler?
Rather than using ng-controller on your directive's template, you need to put the controller in your directive's controller property:
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
require: '^ngModel',
scope: {
ngModel: '='
},
template: '<div class="collapsingBox"><div class="label">Title: {{ ngModel.title }}</div><br/><div ng-transclude ng-show="expanded">Test</div></div>',
controller: 'CollapseController',
link: function($scope, element, attr) {
element.bind('click', function() {
alert('Clicked!');
$scope.toggle();
});
}
};
As it is CollapseController's scope will be a child scope of your directive's scope, which is why toggle() isn't showing up there.
How we can get particular isolated scope of the directive while calling link function from controller(parent)?
I am having a directive and repeating it using ng-repeat. Whenever a button in the directive template is clicked it will call a function- Stop() in directive controller which in-turn calls function test() in parent controller, inside test() it will call a method dirSample () in directive's link function.
When I print the scope inside dirSample(), it prints the scope of the last created directive not the one which called it.
How can I get the scope of the directive which called it?
Find the pluker here
.directive('stopwatch', function() {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
scope: {
meri : '&',
control: '='
},
templateUrl: 'text.html',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
scope.internalControl = scope.control || {};
scope.internalControl.dirSample = function(){
console.log(scope)
console.log(element)
console.log(attrs)
console.log(ctrl)
}
},
controllerAs: 'swctrl',
controller: function($scope, $interval)
{
var self = this;
self.stop = function()
{
console.log($scope)
$scope.meri(1)
};
}
}});
full code in plunker
I've changed the binding of your function from & to = since you need to pass a parameter. This means some syntax changes are in order, and also you need to pass the scope along the chain if you want to have it all the way at the end:
HTML:
<div stopwatch control="dashControl" meri="test"></div>
Controller:
$scope.test = function(scope)
{
console.log(scope);
$scope.dashControl.dirSample(scope);
}
Directive:
.directive('stopwatch', function() {
return {
restrict: 'AE',
scope: {
meri : '=',
control: '='
},
templateUrl: 'text.html',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
scope.internalControl = scope.control || {};
scope.internalControl.dirSample = function(_scope){
console.log(_scope);
}
},
controllerAs: 'swctrl',
controller: function($scope, $interval)
{
var self = this;
self.stop = function()
{
console.log($scope);
$scope.meri($scope);
};
}
}});
Plunker
I have the following code:
<div id='parent'>
<div id='child1'>
<my-select></my-select>
</div>
<div id='child2'>
<my-input></my-input>
</div>
</div>
I also have two directives which get some data from the data factory. I need the two directives to talk to each other such that when a value in select box is changed the input in changes accordingly.
Here's my two directives:
.directive("mySelect", function ($compile) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope:'=',
template: " <select id='mapselectdropdown'>\
<option value=map1>map1</option> \
<option value=map2>map2</option> \
</select>'",
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
scope.selectValue = //dont konw how to get the value of the select
}
};
})
.directive("myInput", function($compile) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
controller: ['$scope', 'dataService', function ($scope, dataService) {
dataService.getLocalData().then(function (data) {
$scope.masterData = data.input;
});
}],
template: "<input id='someInput'></input>",
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
//here I need to get the select value and assign it to the input
}
};
})
This would essentially do the onchange() function that you can add on selects. any ideas?
You could use $rootScope to broadcast a message that the other controller listens for:
// Broadcast with
$rootScope.$broadcast('inputChange', 'new value');
// Subscribe with
$rootScope.$on('inputChange', function(newValue) { /* do something */ });
Read Angular docs here
Maybe transclude the directives to get access to properties of outer scope where you define the shared variable ?
What does this transclude option do, exactly? transclude makes the contents of a directive with this option have access to the scope outside of the directive rather than inside.
-> https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive
After much research this is what worked...
I added the following:
.directive('onChange', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope:{'onChange':'=' },
link: function(scope, elm, attrs) {
scope.$watch('onChange', function(nVal) { elm.val(nVal); });
elm.bind('blur', function() {
var currentValue = elm.val();
if( scope.onChange !== currentValue ) {
scope.$apply(function() {
scope.onChange = currentValue;
});
}
});
}
};
})
Then on the element's link function I added:
link: function (scope, elm, attrs) {
scope.$watch('onChange', function (nVal) {
elm.val(nVal);
});
}
Last added the attribute that the values would get set to in the scope:
<select name="map-select2" on-change="mapId" >
Is there a way for not losing connection to the current controller when you are wrapping data with a directive ?
My problem is, that the directive within the wrapped template has no connection to the outside controller any more and so I can not execute the function.
Wrapping Directive:
myApp.directive('wrapContent', function() {
return {
restrict: "E",
scope: {
model: "=",
datas: "="
},
templateUrl: "./any/template.php",
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
// any
}
};
});
Directive within the wrapped Template
myApp.directive('doAction', function() {
return {
restrict: "A",
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
$(elem).click(function(e) {
scope.$apply(attrs.doAction);
});
}
}
});
Conroller:
lmsApp.controller('OutsideController', function ($scope){
$sope.sayHello = function() {
alert("hello");
};
});
HTML where I want to execute the function (template.php):
<div>
<do-action="sayHello()"></do-action>
</div>
How I call the wrapContent directive which is outside (Updated):
<div ng-controller="OutsideController">
<wrap-content model="any" datas="data_any"></wrap-content>
</div>
How can I execute the sayHello() function?
Thank you for your help! I would appreciate every answer.
wrapContent directive will be processed with the scope of controller.
DoAction directive will be processed with the isolateScope of wrapContent directive.
Solution1:
Get a reference to the sayHello function in wrapContent using '&' and execute it in event handler.
Solution2:
Instead of using scope in your event handler, use scope.$parent.
You should pass sayHallo function to your parent directive using &
myApp.directive('wrapContent', function() {
return {
restrict: "E",
scope: {
model: "=",
datas: "=",
sayHallo: "&"
},
templateUrl: "./any/template.php",
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
// any
}
};
});
HTML
<div ng-controller="OutsideController">
<wrap-content model="any" datas="data_any" sayHallo="sayHallo()"></wrap-content>
</div>
Then in your child directive, you will have sayHallo in your scope, to call it just do it this:
myApp.directive('doAction', function() {
return {
restrict: "A",
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
scope.sayHallo();
}
}
});
And you dont need pass it again. So your child directive should looks like this:
<div>
<do-action></do-action>
</div>
UPDATE
If you want to use all your parent model functions,without passing each function. In your child directive,just use scope.model to have access to model attributes and functions.
myApp.directive('doAction', function() {
return {
restrict: "A",
link: function(scope, elem, attrs) {
scope.model.sayHallo();
}
}
});