I'm using gulp-processhtml to update my html based on html comments. I need to pass, using options, same variables to its engine in this way:
gulp.task('buildIndex', ['clean', 'copyStatic'], function () {
return gulp.src('src/static/index.html').pipe(processhtml({
data: { name: 'myname' }
})).pipe(gulp.dest('dist/static'));
});
Everything works fine.
Now I need to retrieve 'myname' value using an async task, for example reading it from filesystem. How can I mix it up this new task inside my gulp stream pipes?
Thanks
I solved in this way using Q and returning a promise:
var deferred = Q.defer();
myAsyncTask(function(myName) {
gulp.src('src/static/index.html').pipe(processhtml({
data: { name: myName }
})).pipe(gulp.dest('dist/static')).on('end', function() {
deferred.resolve();
});
});
return deferred.promise;
Don't know if it's the most elegant way, but it works very well.
Related
(I asked this question recently and accepted an answer but it's still not what I need.) I really need to create dynamic tests from data loaded from a module. Each item from the array will have it's own describe statement with certain protractor actions. My previous post has an answer that says to use an it statement, but I can't do that because there's too much going on.
My main problem is that the data doesn't get loaded in time for the describe. I had another suggestion to use VCR.js or something similar but I don't think those will work because I'm using a module. Is there a way I can save the data to a separate file and load it in? Would that be a good way to go?
var data = require('get-data'); //custom module here
describe('Test', function() {
var itemsArr;
beforeAll(function(done) {
data.get(function(err, result) {
itemsArr = result; //load data from module
done();
});
})
//error: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined
describe('check each item', function() {
itemsArr.forEach(function(item) {
checkItem(item);
});
});
function checkItem (item) {
var itemName = item.name;
describe(itemName, function() {
console.log('describe');
it('should work', function() {
console.log('it');
expect(true).toBeTruthy();
});
});
}
});
UPDATE:
I used Eugene's answer and came up with this. I can't test each individual study how I want because the it statement doesn't fire. Is this problem even solvable??
describe('check each item', function () {
it('should load data', function (done) {
browser.wait(itemsPromise, 5000);
itemsPromise.then(function(itemsArr) {
expect(itemsArr).toBeTruthy();
studyArr = itemsArr.filter(function (item) {
return item.enabled && _.contains(item.tags, 'study');
});
studyCount = studyArr.length;
expect(studies.count()).toEqual(studyCount);
checkItems(studyArr);
done();
});
});
function checkItems (itemsArr) {
itemsArr.forEach(function (item) {
describe(item.id, function () {
console.log('checkItems', item.id);
// doesn't work
it('should work', function (done) {
expect(false).toBeTruthy();
done();
});
});
});
}
});
You're trying to do something that Jasmine does not allow: generating tests after the test suite has started. See this comment on an issue of Jasmine:
Jasmine doesn't support adding specs once the suite has started running. Usually, when I've needed to do this, I've been able to know the list of options ahead of time and just loop through them to make the it calls. [...]
("adding specs" === "adding tests")
The point is that you can generate tests dynamically but only before the test suite has started executing tests. One corollary of this is that the test generation cannot be asynchronous.
Your second attempt does not work because it is trying to add tests to a suite that is already running.
Your first attempt is closer to what you need but it does not work either because describe calls its callback immediately, so beforeAll has not run by the time your describe tries to generate the tests.
Solutions
It all boils down to computing the value of itemsArr before the test suite start executing tests.
You could create a .getSync method that would return results synchronously. Your code would then be something like:
var data = require('get-data'); //custom module here
var itemsArr = data.getSync();
describe('Test', function() {
describe('check each item', function() {
itemsArr.forEach(function(item) {
checkItem(item);
});
});
[...]
If writing .getSync function is not possible, you could have an external process be responsible for producing a JSON output that you could then deserialize into itemsArr. You'd execute this external process with one of the ...Sync functions of child_process.
Here's an example of how the 2nd option could work. I've created a get-data.js file with the following code which uses setTimeout to simulate an asynchronous operation:
var Promise = require("bluebird"); // Bluebird is a promise library.
var get = exports.get = function () {
return new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
var itemsArr = [
{
name: "one",
param: "2"
},
{
name: "two",
param: "2"
}
];
setTimeout(function () {
resolve(itemsArr);
}, 1000);
});
};
// This is what we run when were are running this module as a "script" instead
// of a "module".
function main() {
get().then(function (itemsArr) {
console.log(JSON.stringify(itemsArr));
});
};
// Check whether we are a script or a module...
if (require.main === module) {
main();
}
Then, inside the spec file:
var child_process = require('child_process');
var itemsArr = JSON.parse(child_process.execFileSync(
"/usr/bin/node", ["get-data.js"]));
describe('Test', function() {
itemsArr.forEach(function(item) {
checkItem(item);
});
function checkItem (item) {
var itemName = item.name;
describe(itemName, function() {
console.log('describe');
it('should work', function() {
console.log('it');
expect(true).toBeTruthy();
});
});
}
});
I've tested the code above using jasmine-node. And the following file structure:
.
├── data.js
├── get-data.js
└── test
└── foo.spec.js
./node_modules has bluebird and jasmine-node in it. This is what I get:
$ ./node_modules/.bin/jasmine-node --verbose test
describe
describe
it
it
Test - 5 ms
one - 4 ms
should work - 4 ms
two - 1 ms
should work - 1 ms
Finished in 0.007 seconds
2 tests, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 skipped
Try to use a promise, something like:
var deferred = protractor.promise.defer();
var itemsPromise = deferred.promise;
beforeAll(function() {
data.get(function(err, result) {
deferred.fulfill(result);
});
})
And then:
describe('check each item', function() {
itemsPromise.then(function(itemsArr) {
itemsArr.forEach(function(item) {
checkItem(item);
});
});
});
Another solution I can think of is to use browser.wait to wait until itemsArr becomes not empty.
Is your get-data module doing some browser things with protractor? If so, you will need to set/get itemsArr within the context of the controlFlow. Otherwise it will read all the code in the get-data module, but defer its execution and not wait for it to finish before moving right along to those expect statements.
var data = require('get-data'); //custom module here
var itemsArr;
describe('Test', function() {
beforeAll(function() {
// hook into the controlFlow and set the value of the variable
browser.controlFlow().execute(function() {
data.get(function(err, result) {
itemsArr = result; //load data from module
});
});
});
//error: Cannot read property 'forEach' of undefined
describe('check each item', function() {
// hook into the controlFlow and get the value of the variable (at that point in time)
browser.controlFlow().execute(function() {
itemsArr.forEach(function(item) {
checkItem(item);
});
});
});
function checkItem (item) {
var itemName = item.name;
describe(itemName, function() {
console.log('describe');
it('should work', function() {
console.log('it');
expect(true).toBeTruthy();
});
});
}
});
Here, _fact is a reference to the service.
it('Git Check', function() {
$scope.user = 'swayams'
var data;
_fact.Git($scope).then(function(d) {
expect(d.data.length).toEqual(4)
}, function() { expect(d).not.toBeNull(); });
});
I am getting the error
SPEC HAS NO EXPECTATIONS Git Check
Update
After forcing async as per #FelisCatus and adding $formDigest, I am getting a different error Error: Unexpected request: GET https://api.github.com/users/swayams/repos
No more request expected
The updated code snippet looks something like -
it('Git Check', function(done) {
$scope.user = 'swayams'
var data;
_fact.Git($scope).then(function(d) {
expect(d.data.length).toEqual(4)
}, function() { expect(d).not.toBeNull(); });
});
$rootScope.$formDigest();
I have a Plunk here illustrating the issue.
Jasmine is not seeing your expectations because your function returns before any expect() is called. Depending on your situation, you may want to use async tests, or use some promise matchers.
With async tests, you add an additional argument to your test function, done.
it('Git Check', function (done) {
$scope.user = 'swayams'
var data;
_fact.Git($scope).then(function(d) {
expect(d.data.length).toEqual(4);
}, function() { expect(d).not.toBeNull(); }).finally(done);
$rootScope.$digest();
});
(Note the finally clause in the end of the promise chain.)
Please note that you have to do $rootScope.$digest() for the promises to resolve, even if your code is not using it. See: How to resolve promises in AngularJS, Jasmine 2.0 when there is no $scope to force a digest?
I'm using qwest to query my endpoint as shown below, the onGetResourceCompleted handler fires as expected but data is undefined. Why?
var Actions = Reflux.createActions({
'getResource': { asyncResult: true }
});
Actions.getResource.listenAndPromise(function (id) {
return qwest.get('http://localhost:8000/my-data/'+id, null, { withCredentials: true });
});
var MyStore = Reflux.createStore({
listenables: Actions,
init: function () {
Actions.getResource('');
},
onGetResourceCompleted: function (data) {
console.log('OK', data); // Get's called but data is undefined. Why?
}
});
I can see the data loads correctly by looking at dev tools as well as calling qwest in isolation by simply doing:
qwest.get('http://localhost:8000/my-data/'+id, null, { withCredentials: true }).then(function(data) {
console.log('OK', data);
});
Also doing the following works:
ServiceActions.getResource.listen(function (id) {
ServiceActions.getResource.promise(
qwest.get('http://localhost:8000/my-data/'+id, null, { withCredentials: true })
);
});
I've put some comments on the cause of this "confirmed bug" in the original issue you opened at github.com/spoike/refluxjs.
So, though you are using the reflux features the way they are intended, and they're definitely creating a race condition without even returning the race results, I think you're in luck. It turns out the two particular features you're using in this combination with this type of request is a bit redundant when you already have a promise available. I'd recommend you just drop the onGetRequestCompleted handler entirely, and handle completion using the standard promise ways of handling resolved promises, which honestly will give you more flexibility anyways.
For example:
var MyStore = Reflux.createStore({
listenables: Actions,
init: function () {
Actions.getResource('')
.then() <-- this eliminates the need for onGetResourceCompleted
.catch() <-- or this instead/in addition
.finally() <-- or this instead/in additon
},
// no more onGetResourceCompleted
});
I have a Gulp task that renders a file containing a Lodash template and puts it in my build directory. I use gulp-template to do the rendering.
To render correctly, my template needs to be passed a list of files from my build directory. I get this list using glob. Since the glob API is asynchronous, I'm forced to write my task like this:
gulp.task('render', function() {
glob('src/**/*.js', function (err, appJsFiles) {
// Get rid of the first path component.
appJsFiles = _.map(appJsFiles, function(f) {
return f.slice(6);
});
// Render the file.
gulp.src('src/template.html')
.pipe(template({
scripts: appJsFiles,
styles: ['style1.css', 'style2.css', 'style3.css']
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest(config.build_dir));
});
});
This seems inelegant to me. Is there a better way to write this task?
The easiest way to fix your specific problem is to use the synchronous mode for glob, which is in the docs you linked to. Then return the result of gulp.src.
gulp.task('render', function() {
var appJsFiles = _.map(glob.sync('src/**/*.js'), function(f) {
return f.slice(6);
});
// Render the file.
return gulp.src('src/template.html')
.pipe(template({
scripts: appJsFiles,
styles: ['style1.css', 'style2.css', 'style3.css']
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest(config.build_dir));
});
If you want a task to run asynchronously, take in a callback.
gulp.task('render', function(cb) {
glob('src/**/*.js', function (err, appJsFiles) {
if (err) {
return cb(err);
}
// Get rid of the first path component.
appJsFiles = _.map(appJsFiles, function(f) {
return f.slice(6);
});
// Render the file.
gulp.src('src/template.html')
.pipe(template({
scripts: appJsFiles,
styles: ['style1.css', 'style2.css', 'style3.css']
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest(config.build_dir))
.on('end', cb);
});
});
I'm currently struggeling to really understand how to refactor my code to use promises/the Q library.
Consider the following common basic example: I have a testcase that imports the same file twice into a mongodb and then checks whether the dataset name for the second import got some modifier at the end.
importDataSet('myFile.csv',function () {
importDataSet('myFile.csv',function () {
DataSet.find({title: 1}, function (err, result) {
result.length.should.be.equal(2);
result[0].title.should.startWith('myFile');
result[1].title.should.startWith('myFile');
result[0].title.should.not.be.equal(result[0].title);
done();
});
});
});
done();
});
(done() is the final callback):
So how would I do this using promises?
Preferably without changing the function signatures, (I followed the convention to have callbacks as the last parameter).
I am not sure why done() is called twice in your code, but without that, it may look similar to:
importDataSet('myFile.csv')
.then(function () {
return importDataSet('myFile.csv')
}).then(function () {
return DataSet.find({title: 1})
}).then(function (result) {
result.length.should.be.equal(2);
result[0].title.should.startWith('myFile');
result[1].title.should.startWith('myFile');
result[0].title.should.not.be.equal(result[0].title);
done();
});