A leading zero for the day within a string seems to break the Javascript Date object in Chrome. There are also some inconsistencies between browsers, since Firefox handles the leading zero correctly, but fails when the zero is not included. See this example: https://jsfiddle.net/3m6ovh1f/3/
Date('2015-11-01'); // works in Firefox, not in Chrome
Date('2015-11-1'); // works in Chrome, not in Firefox
Why? Is there a good way to work around/with the leading zero?
Please note, the strings are coming from MySQL via AJAX and all dates will contain the leading zero, and I can fix this by formating the dates server-side. What format would work the best?
EDIT
Just to specify what my problem was, it looks like Chrome is applying a time zone to the YYYY-MM-DD format, which reverts the Nov. 1st date back to the Oct. 31st date (because of my EDT local time).
According to ECMA-262 (5.1):
The function first attempts to parse the format of the String according to the rules called out in Date Time String Format (15.9.1.15). If the String does not conform to that format the function may fall back to any implementation-specific heuristics or implementation-specific date formats.
The date/time string format as described in 15.9.1.15 is YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ. It can also be a shorter representation of this format, like YYYY-MM-DD.
2015-11-1 is not a valid date/time string for Javascript (note it's YYYY-MM-D and not YYYY-MM-DD). Thus, the implementation (browser) is able to do whatever it wants with that string. It can attempt to parse the string in a different format, or it can simply say that the string is an invalid date. Chrome chooses the former (see DateParser::Parse) and attempts to parse it as a "legacy" date. Firefox seems to choose the latter, and refuses to parse it.
Now, your claim that new Date('2015-11-01') doesn't work in Chrome is incorrect. As the string conforms to the date/time string format, Chrome must parse it to be specification compliant. In fact, I just tried it myself -- it works in Chrome.
So, what are your options here?
Use the correct date/time format (i.e. YYYY-MM-DD or some extension of it).
Use the new Date (year, month, date) constructor, i.e. new Date(2015, 10, 1) (months go from 0-11) in this case.
Whichever option is up to you, but there is a date/time string format that all specification compliant browsers should agree on.
As an alternative, why not use unix timestamps instead? In JavaScript, you would would multiply the timestamp value by 1000,
e.g
var _t = { time: 1446220558 };
var _d = new Date( _t.time*1000 );
Test in your browser console:
new Date( 14462205581000 );
// prints Fri Oct 30 2015 11:55:58 GMT-0400 (EDT)
There's a little benefit in it as well (if data comes via JS) - you'd save 2 bytes on every date element '2015-10-30' VS 1446220558 :)
Related
I want to convert a string into a date "as it is".
const date = "8/16/2019"
console.log(new Date(date))
However, I get:
As you can see I get the prevous day. I was thinking that it might be a timezone issue, even though there is no timezone that I am converting it from.
Any suggestions how to convert is as it is?
I appreciate you replies!
If your format is consistent, you could split on / and use Date.UTC. Creating your new Date from that would ensure it's UTC.
const date = "8/16/2019"
const [month,day,year] = date.split("/");
const utcDate = Date.UTC(year,month-1,day);
console.log(new Date(utcDate));
const date = "8/16/2019"
console.log(new Date(date).toLocaleString("en-US", {timeZone: "Asia/kolkata"}))
Note:- You need to add timezone
You can use toLocaleDateString
console.log(new Date("8/16/2019").toLocaleDateString('en-us', {timeZone: "Asia/Kolkata"}))
new Date("8/16/2019") will create a date object using your current timezone. Add a "Z" at the end if you want your date to be in UTC.
console.log(new Date("8/16/2019Z"))
EDIT
It appears that Firefox is not implementing the parsing of standard date format. Unfortunately until recently how exactly was a date parsed was completeley based on heuristics and intrinsically non portable.
Looking at Firefox bug tracker seems the issue has been discussed but the problem is still present (some toolkit just works around by replacing "Z" with "+00:00" before calling the parser).
The only way to be sure on every browser is to parse the string yourself and build the date from the fields. I didn't notice because I'm using chrome instead (in both chrome and Node works as expected).
EDIT 2
After more investigation seems the standard requires that:
If you use yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ssz then you get what ISO format for datetime defines it to be. Also the syntax described in the standard is not very precise and for example is not clear to me if the time zone can be present when no time is present (Chrome says yes, Firefox says no).
If you use another format then anything goes (so for example there is no string that is guaranteed to issue an invalid date response).
In other words new Date("8/16/2019") is not portable Javascript (with the meaning that you don't know what date / time / timezone you will get, if any). Either you parse yourself the date or you just live with what that version of that Javascript engine in that moment decides to give you.
I'm looking at a semi-old codebase where the following code is used to format a date in YYYY-MM-DD format according to a user's locale:
new Date('2000-01-01').toLocaleDateString(navigator.language)
However, this doesn't work in Firefox because new Date('2000-01-01') returns a datetime (time is 00:00) in UTC while toLocaleDateString uses the user's local timezone, so the above will return "December 31, 1999" for a user in the US.
What is the sane, safe way of doing this across browsers? Is it possible to do without one or more extra dependency?
If you add a timestamp to that date string it seems to be initialized with that time in the local timezone:
new Date('2000-01-01T00:00:00');
I tried this in both Chrome and Firefox and it seems to work as you want. However, creating a date with a string should be avoided as there's no guarantee it works consistently across different browsers. It's better to break the date into its parts, parse it as numeric values and initialize the date that way:
var dateParts = '2000-01-01'.split('-').map(Number);
new Date(
dateParts[0],
dateParts[1] - 1, // month is base 0
dateParts[2]
);
Update: Turns out Safari assumes UTC even if appending a timestamp to the date string, so this is one more reason to parse it and initialize the date with numeric values, as this always uses the local timezone.
If you take the following:
var s = "2/8888/2016";
var d = new Date(s);
alert(d);
In Chrome, you'll get:
Invalid Date
But in IE and Firefox, you'll get:
Fri Jun 01 2040 00:00:00 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)
It appears to be just adding 8888 days to Feb 01. Instead, I would expect the date to be considered invalid. Is there a way I can make FireFox and IE think this date string is invalid?
Short answer:
It's a misbehaviuor of the browsers you're mentioning.
You have to check date is in correct format on your own. But it's quite trivial, I suggest this approach:
Split the date in year y, month m, day d and create the Date object:
var date = new Date( y, m - 1, d ); // note that month is 0 based
Then compare the original values with the logical values obtained using the Date methods:
var isValid = date.getDate() == d &&
date.getMonth() == m-1 &&
date.getFullYear() == y;
Before doing all of this you may want to check if the date string is valid for any browser:
Detecting an "invalid date" Date instance in JavaScript
Long answer:
Firefox (and IE) accepting "2/8888/2016" as a correct string sate format seem to be a bug / misbehaviour.
In fact according to ECMAScript 2015 Language Specification when Date() is invoked with a single string argument should behave just as Date.parse()
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-date-value
The latter
attempts to parse the format of the String according to the rules (including extended years) called out in Date Time String Format (20.3.1.16)
..that is specified here
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-date-time-string-format
where you can read
The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ
[...]
MM is the month of the year from 01 (January) to 12 (December).
DD is the day of the month from 01 to 31.
It seems that Firefox is interpreting the string value as when Date() is invoked with multiple arguments.
From
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date
Note: Where Date is called as a constructor with more than one argument, if values are greater than their logical range (e.g. 13 is provided as the month value or 70 for the minute value), the adjacent value will be adjusted. E.g. new Date(2013, 13, 1) is equivalent to new Date(2014, 1, 1), both create a date for 2014-02-01 (note that the month is 0-based). Similarly for other values: new Date(2013, 2, 1, 0, 70) is equivalent to new Date(2013, 2, 1, 1, 10) which both create a date for 2013-03-01T01:10:00.
This may explain how "2/8888/2016" turns into 2040-05-31T22:00:00.000Z
There's no way to make IE and FF think it's invalid, except:
you could change their javascript implementations
you use a library instead to deal with that.
We can also expect that Javascript, as a language, evolves and we can cross our fingers that browsers decide to follow a more strict specification. The problem of course is that every "fix" must be also backward compatible with previous versions of the language (does not happen always, Perl for example).
So the best thing by now is to use some library just like momentjs as suggested by Derek in the post comments.
You have stumbled across yet another reason why you should manually parse date strings.
When Date is provided a single string argument, it is treated as a date string and parsed according to the rules in Date.parse. The rules there first attempt to parse it as an ISO 8601 format string. If that doesn't work, it may fall back to any parsing algorithm it wants.
In the case of "2/8888/2016", browsers will first attempt to parse it as an ISO format and fail. It seems from experimentation that IE and Firefox determine that the string is in month/day/year format and effectively call the Date constructor with:
new Date(2016,1,8888);
However, other browsers may attempt to validate the values and decide that 8888 is not a valid date or month, so return an invalid date. Both responses are compliant with ECMA-262.
The best advice is to always manually parse date strings (a library can help, but generally isn't necessary as a bespoke parse function with validation is 3 lines of code) then you can be certain of consistent results in any browser or host environment.
I have a table that contains DateTimes in UTC. I'm using PHP to return these date/time strings to an AJAX request in JSON. An example of one of these strings I am receiving on the front end is "2014-12-22 09:36:54". I would like to display this to the user in their local time. For instance I am 8 hours behind UTC time in California, so I would like to see something like "2014-12-22 01:36:54".
In javascript I tried new Date("2014-12-22T09:36:54").toLocaleString() and got "12/22/2014, 9:36:54 AM"---basically an unchanged date/time.
I tried new Date("2014-12-22T09:36:54").toUTCString() and I got "Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:36:54 GMT", which is pretty much the opposite of what I wanted. But I guess that should have been obvious.
Last thoughts...:
Am I going to have to do some manipulation involving getTimezoneOffset()?
Would this be easier solved on the PHP backend?
One last note is that I included jstz.js thinking it would help but all it does is return the timezone name, and I don't know how that is particularly useful. Does any function take the name of a timezone as an argument which would be helpful in this situation?
To reliably convert a UTC string like "2014-12-22 09:36:54" to local, manually parse it, e.g.:
function parseISOAsLocal(s) {
var b = s.split(/\D/);
return new Date(Date.UTC(b[0], b[1]-1, b[2], b[3], b[4], b[5]));
}
An ISO 8601 compliant string without a timezone must be treated as UTC according to the current ECMA-262 standard (ed5). However, the draft version 6 changes that to treat them as local (per ISO 8601). Most browsers treat it as UTC, however Chrome treats it as local (and IE 8 as NaN). Much better to manually parse date strings and avoid browser vagaries.
How do I convert a date string coming from a database into a new Date() object?
If I do the following:
var x = new Date('2013-11-05 11:01:46:0');
alert(x);
It works in Chrome, but in Safari it gives me the string "Invalid Date".
Here's the fiddle.
The format of strings accepted by new Date(string) is implementation-dependent. If the browser correctly implements the ES5 specification, however, a strict subset of legal ISO 8601 strings should be accepted. Basically, you need to use UTC instead of local time, put a "T" instead of a space between the date and time, use a decimal point instead of a colon between integral and fractional seconds, and append a "Z" on the end of the whole thing:
2013-11-05T11:01:46.000Z
Perhaps you can get your database to output the dates in that format; otherwise, you should look into a third-party library, such as moment.js.