Related
I have a setInterval running a piece of code 30 times a second. This works great, however when I select another tab (so that the tab with my code becomes inactive), the setInterval is set to an idle state for some reason.
I made this simplified test case (http://jsfiddle.net/7f6DX/3/):
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.css("left", a)
}, 1000 / 30);
If you run this code and then switch to another tab, wait a few seconds and go back, the animation continues at the point it was when you switched to the other tab.
So the animation isn't running 30 times a second in case the tab is inactive. This can be confirmed by counting the amount of times the setInterval function is called each second - this will not be 30 but just 1 or 2 if the tab is inactive.
I guess that this is done by design so as to improve system performance, but is there any way to disable this behavior?
It’s actually a disadvantage in my scenario.
On most browsers inactive tabs have low priority execution and this can affect JavaScript timers.
If the values of your transition were calculated using real time elapsed between frames instead fixed increments on each interval, you not only workaround this issue but also can achieve a smother animation by using requestAnimationFrame as it can get up to 60fps if the processor isn't very busy.
Here's a vanilla JavaScript example of an animated property transition using requestAnimationFrame:
var target = document.querySelector('div#target')
var startedAt, duration = 3000
var domain = [-100, window.innerWidth]
var range = domain[1] - domain[0]
function start() {
startedAt = Date.now()
updateTarget(0)
requestAnimationFrame(update)
}
function update() {
let elapsedTime = Date.now() - startedAt
// playback is a value between 0 and 1
// being 0 the start of the animation and 1 its end
let playback = elapsedTime / duration
updateTarget(playback)
if (playback > 0 && playback < 1) {
// Queue the next frame
requestAnimationFrame(update)
} else {
// Wait for a while and restart the animation
setTimeout(start, duration/10)
}
}
function updateTarget(playback) {
// Uncomment the line below to reverse the animation
// playback = 1 - playback
// Update the target properties based on the playback position
let position = domain[0] + (playback * range)
target.style.left = position + 'px'
target.style.top = position + 'px'
target.style.transform = 'scale(' + playback * 3 + ')'
}
start()
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
div {
position: absolute;
white-space: nowrap;
}
<div id="target">...HERE WE GO</div>
For Background Tasks (non-UI related)
#UpTheCreek comment:
Fine for presentation issues, but still
there are some things that you need to keep running.
If you have background tasks that needs to be precisely executed at given intervals, you can use HTML5 Web Workers. Take a look at Möhre's answer below for more details...
CSS vs JS "animations"
This problem and many others could be avoided by using CSS transitions/animations instead of JavaScript based animations which adds a considerable overhead. I'd recommend this jQuery plugin that let's you take benefit from CSS transitions just like the animate() methods.
I ran into the same problem with audio fading and HTML5 player. It got stuck when tab became inactive.
So I found out a WebWorker is allowed to use intervals/timeouts without limitation. I use it to post "ticks" to the main javascript.
WebWorkers Code:
var fading = false;
var interval;
self.addEventListener('message', function(e){
switch (e.data) {
case 'start':
if (!fading){
fading = true;
interval = setInterval(function(){
self.postMessage('tick');
}, 50);
}
break;
case 'stop':
clearInterval(interval);
fading = false;
break;
};
}, false);
Main Javascript:
var player = new Audio();
player.fader = new Worker('js/fader.js');
player.faderPosition = 0.0;
player.faderTargetVolume = 1.0;
player.faderCallback = function(){};
player.fadeTo = function(volume, func){
console.log('fadeTo called');
if (func) this.faderCallback = func;
this.faderTargetVolume = volume;
this.fader.postMessage('start');
}
player.fader.addEventListener('message', function(e){
console.log('fader tick');
if (player.faderTargetVolume > player.volume){
player.faderPosition -= 0.02;
} else {
player.faderPosition += 0.02;
}
var newVolume = Math.pow(player.faderPosition - 1, 2);
if (newVolume > 0.999){
player.volume = newVolume = 1.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else if (newVolume < 0.001) {
player.volume = newVolume = 0.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else {
player.volume = newVolume;
}
});
There is a solution to use Web Workers (as mentioned before), because they run in separate process and are not slowed down
I've written a tiny script that can be used without changes to your code - it simply overrides functions setTimeout, clearTimeout, setInterval, clearInterval.
Just include it before all your code.
more info here
Both setInterval and requestAnimationFrame don't work when tab is inactive or work but not at the right periods. A solution is to use another source for time events. For example web sockets or web workers are two event sources that work fine while tab is inactive. So no need to move all of your code to a web worker, just use worker as a time event source:
// worker.js
setInterval(function() {
postMessage('');
}, 1000 / 50);
.
var worker = new Worker('worker.js');
var t1 = 0;
worker.onmessage = function() {
var t2 = new Date().getTime();
console.log('fps =', 1000 / (t2 - t1) | 0);
t1 = t2;
}
jsfiddle link of this sample.
Just do this:
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.stop(true,true).css("left", a);
}, 1000 / 30);
Inactive browser tabs buffer some of the setInterval or setTimeout functions.
stop(true,true) will stop all buffered events and execute immediatly only the last animation.
The window.setTimeout() method now clamps to send no more than one timeout per second in inactive tabs. In addition, it now clamps nested timeouts to the smallest value allowed by the HTML5 specification: 4 ms (instead of the 10 ms it used to clamp to).
For me it's not important to play audio in the background like for others here, my problem was that I had some animations and they acted like crazy when you were in other tabs and coming back to them. My solution was putting these animations inside if that is preventing inactive tab:
if (!document.hidden){ //your animation code here }
thanks to that my animation was running only if tab was active.
I hope this will help someone with my case.
I think that a best understanding about this problem is in this example: http://jsfiddle.net/TAHDb/
I am doing a simple thing here:
Have a interval of 1 sec and each time hide the first span and move it to last, and show the 2nd span.
If you stay on page it works as it is supposed.
But if you hide the tab for some seconds, when you get back you will see a weired thing.
Its like all events that didn't ucur during the time you were inactive now will ocur all in 1 time. so for some few seconds you will get like X events. they are so quick that its possible to see all 6 spans at once.
So it seams chrome only delays the events, so when you get back all events will occur but all at once...
A pratical application were this ocur iss for a simple slideshow. Imagine the numbers being Images, and if user stay with tab hidden when he came back he will see all imgs floating, Totally mesed.
To fix this use the stop(true,true) like pimvdb told.
THis will clear the event queue.
Heavily influenced by Ruslan Tushov's library, I've created my own small library. Just add the script in the <head> and it will patch setInterval and setTimeout with ones that use WebWorker.
Playing an audio file ensures full background Javascript performance for the time being
For me, it was the simplest and least intrusive solution - apart from playing a faint / almost-empty sound, there are no other potential side effects
You can find the details here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51191818/914546
(From other answers, I see that some people use different properties of the Audio tag, I do wonder whether it's possible to use the Audio tag for full performance, without actually playing something)
I bring here a simple solution for anyone who is trying to get around this problem in a timer function, where as #kbtzr mentioned in another answer we can use the Date object instead of fixed increments to calculate the time that has passed since the beginning, which will work even if you are out from the application's tab.
This is the example HTML.
<body>
<p id="time"></p>
</body>
Then this JavaScript:
let display = document.querySelector('#time')
let interval
let time
function startTimer() {
let initialTime = new Date().getTime()
interval = setInterval(() => {
let now = new Date().getTime()
time = (now - initialTime) + 10
display.innerText = `${Math.floor((time / (60 * 1000)) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 10) % 100)}`
}, 10)
}
startTimer()
That way, even if the interval value is increased for performance reasons of inactive tabs, the calculation made will guarantee the correct time. This is a vanilla code, but I used this logic in my React application, and you can modify it for wherever you need as well.
It is quite old question but I encountered the same issue.
If you run your web on chrome, you could read through this post Background Tabs in Chrome 57.
Basically the interval timer could run if it haven't run out of the timer budget.
The consumption of budget is based on CPU time usage of the task inside timer.
Based on my scenario, I draw video to canvas and transport to WebRTC.
The webrtc video connection would keep updating even the tab is inactive.
However you have to use setInterval instead of requestAnimationFrame but itt is not recommended for UI rendering though.
It would be better to listen visibilityChange event and change render mechenism accordingly.
Besides, you could try what Kaan Soral suggests and it should works based on the documentation.
I modified Lacerda's response, by adding a functioning UI.
I added start/resume/pause/stop actions.
const
timer = document.querySelector('.timer'),
timerDisplay = timer.querySelector('.timer-display'),
toggleAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="toggle"]'),
stopAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="stop"]'),
tickRate = 10;
let intervalId, initialTime, pauseTime = 0;
const now = () => new Date().getTime();
const formatTime = (hours, minutes, seconds) =>
[hours, minutes, seconds]
.map(v => `${isNaN(v) ? 0 : v}`.padStart(2, '0'))
.join(':');
const update = () => {
let
time = (now() - initialTime) + 10,
hours = Math.floor((time / (60000)) % 60),
minutes = Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60),
seconds = Math.floor((time / 10) % 100);
timerDisplay.textContent = formatTime(hours, minutes, seconds);
};
const
startTimer = () => {
initialTime = now();
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
resumeTimer = () => {
initialTime = now() - (pauseTime - initialTime);
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
pauseTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
pauseTime = now();
},
stopTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
initialTime = undefined;
pauseTime = 0;
},
restartTimer = () => {
stopTimer();
startTimer();
};
const setButtonState = (button, state, text) => {
button.dataset.state = state;
button.textContent = text;
};
const
handleToggle = (e) => {
switch (e.target.dataset.state) {
case 'pause':
setButtonState(e.target, 'resume', 'Resume');
pauseTimer();
break;
case 'resume':
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
resumeTimer();
break;
default:
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
restartTimer();
}
},
handleStop = (e) => {
stopTimer();
update();
setButtonState(toggleAction, 'initial', 'Start');
};
toggleAction.addEventListener('click', handleToggle);
stopAction.addEventListener('click', handleStop);
update();
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background: #000;
}
.timer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-display {
font-family: monospace;
font-size: 3em;
background: #111;
color: #8F8;
border: thin solid #222;
padding: 0.25em;
}
.timer .timer-actions {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action] {
font-family: monospace;
width: 6em;
border: thin solid #444;
background: #222;
color: #EEE;
padding: 0.5em;
cursor: pointer;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action]:hover {
background: #444;
border: thin solid #666;
color: #FFF;
}
<div class="timer">
<div class="timer-display"></div>
<div class="timer-actions">
<button data-action="toggle" data-state="initial">Start</button>
<button data-action="stop">Stop</button>
</div>
</div>
Note: This solution is not suitable if you like your interval works on the background, for example, playing audio or something else. But if you are confused for example about your animation not working properly when coming back to your page or tab, this is a good solution.
There are many ways to achieve this goal, maybe the "WebWorkers" is the most standard one but certainly, it's not the easiest and handy one, especially If you don't have enough Time, so you can try this way:
The basic concept:
build a name for your interval(or animation) and set your interval(animation), so it would run when user first time open your page : var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
by $(window).focus(function() {}); and $(window).blur(function() {}); you can clearInterval(interval_id) everytime browser(tab) is deactived and ReRun your interval(animation) everytime browser(tab) would acive again by interval_id = setInterval();
Sample code:
var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
$(window).focus(function() {
interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
});
$(window).blur(function() {
clearInterval(interval_id);
interval_id = 0;
});
Here's my rough solution
(function(){
var index = 1;
var intervals = {},
timeouts = {};
function postMessageHandler(e) {
window.postMessage('', "*");
var now = new Date().getTime();
sysFunc._each.call(timeouts, function(ind, obj) {
var targetTime = obj[1];
if (now >= targetTime) {
obj[0]();
delete timeouts[ind];
}
});
sysFunc._each.call(intervals, function(ind, obj) {
var startTime = obj[1];
var func = obj[0];
var ms = obj[2];
if (now >= startTime + ms) {
func();
obj[1] = new Date().getTime();
}
});
}
window.addEventListener("message", postMessageHandler, true);
window.postMessage('', "*");
function _setTimeout(func, ms) {
timeouts[index] = [func, new Date().getTime() + ms];
return index++;
}
function _setInterval(func, ms) {
intervals[index] = [func, new Date().getTime(), ms];
return index++;
}
function _clearInterval(ind) {
if (intervals[ind]) {
delete intervals[ind]
}
}
function _clearTimeout(ind) {
if (timeouts[ind]) {
delete timeouts[ind]
}
}
var intervalIndex = _setInterval(function() {
console.log('every 100ms');
}, 100);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('run after 200ms');
}, 200);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('closing the one that\'s 100ms');
_clearInterval(intervalIndex)
}, 2000);
window._setTimeout = _setTimeout;
window._setInterval = _setInterval;
window._clearTimeout = _clearTimeout;
window._clearInterval = _clearInterval;
})();
I was able to call my callback function at minimum of 250ms using audio tag and handling its ontimeupdate event. Its called 3-4 times in a second. Its better than one second lagging setTimeout
There is a workaround for this problem, although actually the tab must be made active in some window.
Make your inactive tab a separate browser window.
Don't make any other window maximized (unless the maximized window is behind yours).
This should give the browser the impression of always being active.
This is bit cumbersome, but also a quick win. Provided one has control over windows arrangement.
I have a progress bar that I want to update whenever a user clicks on something. So it is possible to go backwards and forwards through the progress bar.
Currently, the bar seems to work, but the bar is flickering, as if the bar is being loaded every second. For eg, the user is at 70%, so the bar will fill up to there, then it clears, then it fills up to 70% again. However, this is happening hundreds of time per second, so it seems like the bar is flashing. I also dont know if what I said above is correct - I dont know if it is actually filling then clearing, filling then clearing x100. All I know is thats what it looks like, and its giving it a flickering effect.
I got the code from here: https://www.w3schools.com/howto/howto_js_progressbar.asp
and I am using the first eg, with no label.
I have amended it so that it takes an input and the bar is based on that.
function move(i) {
var elem = document.getElementById("myBar");
var width = 1;
var id = setInterval(frame, 10);
function frame() {
if (width >= 100) {
clearInterval(id);
} else {
width= (i/lengthOfCurrentModule)*100;
elem.style.width = width + '%';
}
}
}
In the example it was
width++;
so I changed it to what I wanted it to do.
I tried to get rid of
if (width >= 100) {
clearInterval(id);
}
bc I thought it might have been calculating it was over 100, but the problem persists.
I dont know why its flickering like that. Any help is appreciated
Broadly speaking, if you can use CSS to animate something, then you should. This allows the browser to fine-tune control, accounting for things like mobile device computing power, battery and so on. This also automatically includes things like delta-timing to ensure that the animation takes the correct amount of time no matter what.
function move() {
var elem = document.getElementById("myBar");
var perc = +document.getElementById("percentage").value;
// optional: ensures the bar fills/empties at the same rate by varying the animation duration
var previous = move.previous || 0;
move.previous = perc;
var change = Math.abs(perc - previous);
elem.style.transitionDuration = (change*10)+"ms";
elem.style.width = perc+"%";
}
#myProgress {
width: 100%;
background-color: grey;
overflow: hidden;
}
#myBar {
width: 0%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
transition: width 500ms linear;
}
<div id="myProgress">
<div id="myBar"></div>
</div>
<input type="number" min="0" max="100" id="percentage">
<button onclick="move()">Click Me</button>
Is this what you wanted to achieve? You can enter a value and the progressbar fills up to that value.no logic implemented so please enter a value between 1 and 100 and click the button.
function move() {
var elem = document.getElementById("myBar");
var perc = document.getElementById("percentage").value;
var width = 1;
var id = setInterval(frame, 10);
function frame() {
if (width >= perc) {
clearInterval(id);
} else {
width++;
elem.style.width = width + '%';
}
}
}
#myProgress {
width: 100%;
background-color: grey;
}
#myBar {
width: 1%;
height: 30px;
background-color: green;
}
<div id="myProgress">
<div id="myBar"></div>
</div>
<input type="number" id="percentage">
<button onclick="move()">Click Me</button>
I had the same problem. The progress bar was reporting progress for a compute-intensive process. I found that inserting a 500ms wait after I changed the progress value, and prior to executing the next compute-intensive step in my process, allowed the view to render smoothly.
Code snippet:
let count = 0;
for (const name of names) {
count ++;
this.progressLabel = name;
this.progressValue = count / names.length;
await sleep(500); // give a chance for the view to update
await computeIntensiveStuff(name);
}
<ion-item>
<ion-label position="stacked">
Adding: {{progressLabel}}
</ion-label>
<ion-progress-bar [value]="progressValue">
</ion-progress-bar>
</ion-item>
I have a setInterval running a piece of code 30 times a second. This works great, however when I select another tab (so that the tab with my code becomes inactive), the setInterval is set to an idle state for some reason.
I made this simplified test case (http://jsfiddle.net/7f6DX/3/):
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.css("left", a)
}, 1000 / 30);
If you run this code and then switch to another tab, wait a few seconds and go back, the animation continues at the point it was when you switched to the other tab.
So the animation isn't running 30 times a second in case the tab is inactive. This can be confirmed by counting the amount of times the setInterval function is called each second - this will not be 30 but just 1 or 2 if the tab is inactive.
I guess that this is done by design so as to improve system performance, but is there any way to disable this behavior?
It’s actually a disadvantage in my scenario.
On most browsers inactive tabs have low priority execution and this can affect JavaScript timers.
If the values of your transition were calculated using real time elapsed between frames instead fixed increments on each interval, you not only workaround this issue but also can achieve a smother animation by using requestAnimationFrame as it can get up to 60fps if the processor isn't very busy.
Here's a vanilla JavaScript example of an animated property transition using requestAnimationFrame:
var target = document.querySelector('div#target')
var startedAt, duration = 3000
var domain = [-100, window.innerWidth]
var range = domain[1] - domain[0]
function start() {
startedAt = Date.now()
updateTarget(0)
requestAnimationFrame(update)
}
function update() {
let elapsedTime = Date.now() - startedAt
// playback is a value between 0 and 1
// being 0 the start of the animation and 1 its end
let playback = elapsedTime / duration
updateTarget(playback)
if (playback > 0 && playback < 1) {
// Queue the next frame
requestAnimationFrame(update)
} else {
// Wait for a while and restart the animation
setTimeout(start, duration/10)
}
}
function updateTarget(playback) {
// Uncomment the line below to reverse the animation
// playback = 1 - playback
// Update the target properties based on the playback position
let position = domain[0] + (playback * range)
target.style.left = position + 'px'
target.style.top = position + 'px'
target.style.transform = 'scale(' + playback * 3 + ')'
}
start()
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
div {
position: absolute;
white-space: nowrap;
}
<div id="target">...HERE WE GO</div>
For Background Tasks (non-UI related)
#UpTheCreek comment:
Fine for presentation issues, but still
there are some things that you need to keep running.
If you have background tasks that needs to be precisely executed at given intervals, you can use HTML5 Web Workers. Take a look at Möhre's answer below for more details...
CSS vs JS "animations"
This problem and many others could be avoided by using CSS transitions/animations instead of JavaScript based animations which adds a considerable overhead. I'd recommend this jQuery plugin that let's you take benefit from CSS transitions just like the animate() methods.
I ran into the same problem with audio fading and HTML5 player. It got stuck when tab became inactive.
So I found out a WebWorker is allowed to use intervals/timeouts without limitation. I use it to post "ticks" to the main javascript.
WebWorkers Code:
var fading = false;
var interval;
self.addEventListener('message', function(e){
switch (e.data) {
case 'start':
if (!fading){
fading = true;
interval = setInterval(function(){
self.postMessage('tick');
}, 50);
}
break;
case 'stop':
clearInterval(interval);
fading = false;
break;
};
}, false);
Main Javascript:
var player = new Audio();
player.fader = new Worker('js/fader.js');
player.faderPosition = 0.0;
player.faderTargetVolume = 1.0;
player.faderCallback = function(){};
player.fadeTo = function(volume, func){
console.log('fadeTo called');
if (func) this.faderCallback = func;
this.faderTargetVolume = volume;
this.fader.postMessage('start');
}
player.fader.addEventListener('message', function(e){
console.log('fader tick');
if (player.faderTargetVolume > player.volume){
player.faderPosition -= 0.02;
} else {
player.faderPosition += 0.02;
}
var newVolume = Math.pow(player.faderPosition - 1, 2);
if (newVolume > 0.999){
player.volume = newVolume = 1.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else if (newVolume < 0.001) {
player.volume = newVolume = 0.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else {
player.volume = newVolume;
}
});
There is a solution to use Web Workers (as mentioned before), because they run in separate process and are not slowed down
I've written a tiny script that can be used without changes to your code - it simply overrides functions setTimeout, clearTimeout, setInterval, clearInterval.
Just include it before all your code.
more info here
Both setInterval and requestAnimationFrame don't work when tab is inactive or work but not at the right periods. A solution is to use another source for time events. For example web sockets or web workers are two event sources that work fine while tab is inactive. So no need to move all of your code to a web worker, just use worker as a time event source:
// worker.js
setInterval(function() {
postMessage('');
}, 1000 / 50);
.
var worker = new Worker('worker.js');
var t1 = 0;
worker.onmessage = function() {
var t2 = new Date().getTime();
console.log('fps =', 1000 / (t2 - t1) | 0);
t1 = t2;
}
jsfiddle link of this sample.
Just do this:
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.stop(true,true).css("left", a);
}, 1000 / 30);
Inactive browser tabs buffer some of the setInterval or setTimeout functions.
stop(true,true) will stop all buffered events and execute immediatly only the last animation.
The window.setTimeout() method now clamps to send no more than one timeout per second in inactive tabs. In addition, it now clamps nested timeouts to the smallest value allowed by the HTML5 specification: 4 ms (instead of the 10 ms it used to clamp to).
For me it's not important to play audio in the background like for others here, my problem was that I had some animations and they acted like crazy when you were in other tabs and coming back to them. My solution was putting these animations inside if that is preventing inactive tab:
if (!document.hidden){ //your animation code here }
thanks to that my animation was running only if tab was active.
I hope this will help someone with my case.
I think that a best understanding about this problem is in this example: http://jsfiddle.net/TAHDb/
I am doing a simple thing here:
Have a interval of 1 sec and each time hide the first span and move it to last, and show the 2nd span.
If you stay on page it works as it is supposed.
But if you hide the tab for some seconds, when you get back you will see a weired thing.
Its like all events that didn't ucur during the time you were inactive now will ocur all in 1 time. so for some few seconds you will get like X events. they are so quick that its possible to see all 6 spans at once.
So it seams chrome only delays the events, so when you get back all events will occur but all at once...
A pratical application were this ocur iss for a simple slideshow. Imagine the numbers being Images, and if user stay with tab hidden when he came back he will see all imgs floating, Totally mesed.
To fix this use the stop(true,true) like pimvdb told.
THis will clear the event queue.
Heavily influenced by Ruslan Tushov's library, I've created my own small library. Just add the script in the <head> and it will patch setInterval and setTimeout with ones that use WebWorker.
Playing an audio file ensures full background Javascript performance for the time being
For me, it was the simplest and least intrusive solution - apart from playing a faint / almost-empty sound, there are no other potential side effects
You can find the details here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51191818/914546
(From other answers, I see that some people use different properties of the Audio tag, I do wonder whether it's possible to use the Audio tag for full performance, without actually playing something)
I bring here a simple solution for anyone who is trying to get around this problem in a timer function, where as #kbtzr mentioned in another answer we can use the Date object instead of fixed increments to calculate the time that has passed since the beginning, which will work even if you are out from the application's tab.
This is the example HTML.
<body>
<p id="time"></p>
</body>
Then this JavaScript:
let display = document.querySelector('#time')
let interval
let time
function startTimer() {
let initialTime = new Date().getTime()
interval = setInterval(() => {
let now = new Date().getTime()
time = (now - initialTime) + 10
display.innerText = `${Math.floor((time / (60 * 1000)) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 10) % 100)}`
}, 10)
}
startTimer()
That way, even if the interval value is increased for performance reasons of inactive tabs, the calculation made will guarantee the correct time. This is a vanilla code, but I used this logic in my React application, and you can modify it for wherever you need as well.
It is quite old question but I encountered the same issue.
If you run your web on chrome, you could read through this post Background Tabs in Chrome 57.
Basically the interval timer could run if it haven't run out of the timer budget.
The consumption of budget is based on CPU time usage of the task inside timer.
Based on my scenario, I draw video to canvas and transport to WebRTC.
The webrtc video connection would keep updating even the tab is inactive.
However you have to use setInterval instead of requestAnimationFrame but itt is not recommended for UI rendering though.
It would be better to listen visibilityChange event and change render mechenism accordingly.
Besides, you could try what Kaan Soral suggests and it should works based on the documentation.
I modified Lacerda's response, by adding a functioning UI.
I added start/resume/pause/stop actions.
const
timer = document.querySelector('.timer'),
timerDisplay = timer.querySelector('.timer-display'),
toggleAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="toggle"]'),
stopAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="stop"]'),
tickRate = 10;
let intervalId, initialTime, pauseTime = 0;
const now = () => new Date().getTime();
const formatTime = (hours, minutes, seconds) =>
[hours, minutes, seconds]
.map(v => `${isNaN(v) ? 0 : v}`.padStart(2, '0'))
.join(':');
const update = () => {
let
time = (now() - initialTime) + 10,
hours = Math.floor((time / (60000)) % 60),
minutes = Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60),
seconds = Math.floor((time / 10) % 100);
timerDisplay.textContent = formatTime(hours, minutes, seconds);
};
const
startTimer = () => {
initialTime = now();
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
resumeTimer = () => {
initialTime = now() - (pauseTime - initialTime);
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
pauseTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
pauseTime = now();
},
stopTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
initialTime = undefined;
pauseTime = 0;
},
restartTimer = () => {
stopTimer();
startTimer();
};
const setButtonState = (button, state, text) => {
button.dataset.state = state;
button.textContent = text;
};
const
handleToggle = (e) => {
switch (e.target.dataset.state) {
case 'pause':
setButtonState(e.target, 'resume', 'Resume');
pauseTimer();
break;
case 'resume':
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
resumeTimer();
break;
default:
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
restartTimer();
}
},
handleStop = (e) => {
stopTimer();
update();
setButtonState(toggleAction, 'initial', 'Start');
};
toggleAction.addEventListener('click', handleToggle);
stopAction.addEventListener('click', handleStop);
update();
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background: #000;
}
.timer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-display {
font-family: monospace;
font-size: 3em;
background: #111;
color: #8F8;
border: thin solid #222;
padding: 0.25em;
}
.timer .timer-actions {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action] {
font-family: monospace;
width: 6em;
border: thin solid #444;
background: #222;
color: #EEE;
padding: 0.5em;
cursor: pointer;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action]:hover {
background: #444;
border: thin solid #666;
color: #FFF;
}
<div class="timer">
<div class="timer-display"></div>
<div class="timer-actions">
<button data-action="toggle" data-state="initial">Start</button>
<button data-action="stop">Stop</button>
</div>
</div>
Note: This solution is not suitable if you like your interval works on the background, for example, playing audio or something else. But if you are confused for example about your animation not working properly when coming back to your page or tab, this is a good solution.
There are many ways to achieve this goal, maybe the "WebWorkers" is the most standard one but certainly, it's not the easiest and handy one, especially If you don't have enough Time, so you can try this way:
The basic concept:
build a name for your interval(or animation) and set your interval(animation), so it would run when user first time open your page : var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
by $(window).focus(function() {}); and $(window).blur(function() {}); you can clearInterval(interval_id) everytime browser(tab) is deactived and ReRun your interval(animation) everytime browser(tab) would acive again by interval_id = setInterval();
Sample code:
var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
$(window).focus(function() {
interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
});
$(window).blur(function() {
clearInterval(interval_id);
interval_id = 0;
});
Here's my rough solution
(function(){
var index = 1;
var intervals = {},
timeouts = {};
function postMessageHandler(e) {
window.postMessage('', "*");
var now = new Date().getTime();
sysFunc._each.call(timeouts, function(ind, obj) {
var targetTime = obj[1];
if (now >= targetTime) {
obj[0]();
delete timeouts[ind];
}
});
sysFunc._each.call(intervals, function(ind, obj) {
var startTime = obj[1];
var func = obj[0];
var ms = obj[2];
if (now >= startTime + ms) {
func();
obj[1] = new Date().getTime();
}
});
}
window.addEventListener("message", postMessageHandler, true);
window.postMessage('', "*");
function _setTimeout(func, ms) {
timeouts[index] = [func, new Date().getTime() + ms];
return index++;
}
function _setInterval(func, ms) {
intervals[index] = [func, new Date().getTime(), ms];
return index++;
}
function _clearInterval(ind) {
if (intervals[ind]) {
delete intervals[ind]
}
}
function _clearTimeout(ind) {
if (timeouts[ind]) {
delete timeouts[ind]
}
}
var intervalIndex = _setInterval(function() {
console.log('every 100ms');
}, 100);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('run after 200ms');
}, 200);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('closing the one that\'s 100ms');
_clearInterval(intervalIndex)
}, 2000);
window._setTimeout = _setTimeout;
window._setInterval = _setInterval;
window._clearTimeout = _clearTimeout;
window._clearInterval = _clearInterval;
})();
I was able to call my callback function at minimum of 250ms using audio tag and handling its ontimeupdate event. Its called 3-4 times in a second. Its better than one second lagging setTimeout
There is a workaround for this problem, although actually the tab must be made active in some window.
Make your inactive tab a separate browser window.
Don't make any other window maximized (unless the maximized window is behind yours).
This should give the browser the impression of always being active.
This is bit cumbersome, but also a quick win. Provided one has control over windows arrangement.
I'm trying to write a script that changes the z-index of 3 images. Basically the script should target the current image and apply a higher z-index on the next image, like a sort of carousel but with a z-index rather then active class. The challenge is to set the z-index after a specific interval. The problem is that the first image is displayed and then the last one. This is my code:
Html:
<div class="changingimages">
<img src="#" data-time="3000" width="100%" class="alternateimage alternateimage1">
<img src="#" data-time="2000" width="100%" class="alternateimage alternateimage2">
<img src="#" data-time="4000" width="100%" class="alternateimage alternateimage3">
</div>
jQuery Script
<script type="text/javascript">
jQuery(document).ready(function(){
var changeImg = function(i, time, currentImg) {
setTimeout(function(){
jQuery(currentImg).next().css("z-index", i);
}, time);
};
var numberOfChilds = jQuery(".changingimages").children().length;
var currentIndexClass;
var currentImg;
var time;
for (var i=1; i<=numberOfChilds; i++) {
currentIndexClass = '.alternateimage' + i;
currentImg = jQuery(currentIndexClass);
time = jQuery(currentIndexClass).attr("data-time");
changeImg(i, time, currentImg);
}
});
I think there is some problem with the closure inside a loop, but not sure!
It's a common misconception that setTimeout schedules events to run relative to previously queued events. It looks like you believe that, theoretically, the following:
setTimeout(f, 100);
setTimeout(g, 100);
setTimeout(h, 100);
would result in a timeline like this:
0ms Start
100ms Run f()
200ms Run g()
300ms Run h()
The reality is that the time option in setTimeout means "run this function after at least this much time has passed." Going off of the previous example, you would actually get something more like
0ms Start
100ms Run f()
101ms Run g()
102ms Run h()
To space out your code correctly, keep adding to the timeout time rather than replacing it.
var time = 0;
for (var i = 1; i <= numberOfChilds; i++) {
currentIndexClass = '.alternateimage' + i;
currentImg = jQuery(currentIndexClass);
// Add to the previous time
time += parseInt(jQuery(currentIndexClass).attr("data-time"), 10);
changeImg(i, time, currentImg);
}
Here is a fiddle implementing the use of timeout to achieve what you want.
fiddle
.textArea {
position: absolute;
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
display: block;
}
.box_a {
background-color: blue;
}
.box_b {
background-color: red;
}
.box_c {
background-color: orange;
}
.active {
z-index: 3;
}
<div class="textArea box_a active">a</div>
<div class="textArea box_b">b</div>
<div class="textArea box_c">c</div>
$(function(){
var $elem = $('.textArea');
timeout(0);
function timeout(i){
$($elem[i]).addClass('active');
return setTimeout(function(){
$elem.removeClass('active');
i++;
if(i >= $elem.length){
i = 0
}
timeout(i);
}, 1000)
}
});
Note it does not use a for loop, because timeout is asynchronous and will not execute sequentially. Each timeout will fire at the same time basically, then do their action based on the wait time.
The solution is to make a function that keeps track of the index, and when the last timeout has completed execution.
I have a setInterval running a piece of code 30 times a second. This works great, however when I select another tab (so that the tab with my code becomes inactive), the setInterval is set to an idle state for some reason.
I made this simplified test case (http://jsfiddle.net/7f6DX/3/):
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.css("left", a)
}, 1000 / 30);
If you run this code and then switch to another tab, wait a few seconds and go back, the animation continues at the point it was when you switched to the other tab.
So the animation isn't running 30 times a second in case the tab is inactive. This can be confirmed by counting the amount of times the setInterval function is called each second - this will not be 30 but just 1 or 2 if the tab is inactive.
I guess that this is done by design so as to improve system performance, but is there any way to disable this behavior?
It’s actually a disadvantage in my scenario.
On most browsers inactive tabs have low priority execution and this can affect JavaScript timers.
If the values of your transition were calculated using real time elapsed between frames instead fixed increments on each interval, you not only workaround this issue but also can achieve a smother animation by using requestAnimationFrame as it can get up to 60fps if the processor isn't very busy.
Here's a vanilla JavaScript example of an animated property transition using requestAnimationFrame:
var target = document.querySelector('div#target')
var startedAt, duration = 3000
var domain = [-100, window.innerWidth]
var range = domain[1] - domain[0]
function start() {
startedAt = Date.now()
updateTarget(0)
requestAnimationFrame(update)
}
function update() {
let elapsedTime = Date.now() - startedAt
// playback is a value between 0 and 1
// being 0 the start of the animation and 1 its end
let playback = elapsedTime / duration
updateTarget(playback)
if (playback > 0 && playback < 1) {
// Queue the next frame
requestAnimationFrame(update)
} else {
// Wait for a while and restart the animation
setTimeout(start, duration/10)
}
}
function updateTarget(playback) {
// Uncomment the line below to reverse the animation
// playback = 1 - playback
// Update the target properties based on the playback position
let position = domain[0] + (playback * range)
target.style.left = position + 'px'
target.style.top = position + 'px'
target.style.transform = 'scale(' + playback * 3 + ')'
}
start()
body {
overflow: hidden;
}
div {
position: absolute;
white-space: nowrap;
}
<div id="target">...HERE WE GO</div>
For Background Tasks (non-UI related)
#UpTheCreek comment:
Fine for presentation issues, but still
there are some things that you need to keep running.
If you have background tasks that needs to be precisely executed at given intervals, you can use HTML5 Web Workers. Take a look at Möhre's answer below for more details...
CSS vs JS "animations"
This problem and many others could be avoided by using CSS transitions/animations instead of JavaScript based animations which adds a considerable overhead. I'd recommend this jQuery plugin that let's you take benefit from CSS transitions just like the animate() methods.
I ran into the same problem with audio fading and HTML5 player. It got stuck when tab became inactive.
So I found out a WebWorker is allowed to use intervals/timeouts without limitation. I use it to post "ticks" to the main javascript.
WebWorkers Code:
var fading = false;
var interval;
self.addEventListener('message', function(e){
switch (e.data) {
case 'start':
if (!fading){
fading = true;
interval = setInterval(function(){
self.postMessage('tick');
}, 50);
}
break;
case 'stop':
clearInterval(interval);
fading = false;
break;
};
}, false);
Main Javascript:
var player = new Audio();
player.fader = new Worker('js/fader.js');
player.faderPosition = 0.0;
player.faderTargetVolume = 1.0;
player.faderCallback = function(){};
player.fadeTo = function(volume, func){
console.log('fadeTo called');
if (func) this.faderCallback = func;
this.faderTargetVolume = volume;
this.fader.postMessage('start');
}
player.fader.addEventListener('message', function(e){
console.log('fader tick');
if (player.faderTargetVolume > player.volume){
player.faderPosition -= 0.02;
} else {
player.faderPosition += 0.02;
}
var newVolume = Math.pow(player.faderPosition - 1, 2);
if (newVolume > 0.999){
player.volume = newVolume = 1.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else if (newVolume < 0.001) {
player.volume = newVolume = 0.0;
player.fader.postMessage('stop');
player.faderCallback();
} else {
player.volume = newVolume;
}
});
There is a solution to use Web Workers (as mentioned before), because they run in separate process and are not slowed down
I've written a tiny script that can be used without changes to your code - it simply overrides functions setTimeout, clearTimeout, setInterval, clearInterval.
Just include it before all your code.
more info here
Both setInterval and requestAnimationFrame don't work when tab is inactive or work but not at the right periods. A solution is to use another source for time events. For example web sockets or web workers are two event sources that work fine while tab is inactive. So no need to move all of your code to a web worker, just use worker as a time event source:
// worker.js
setInterval(function() {
postMessage('');
}, 1000 / 50);
.
var worker = new Worker('worker.js');
var t1 = 0;
worker.onmessage = function() {
var t2 = new Date().getTime();
console.log('fps =', 1000 / (t2 - t1) | 0);
t1 = t2;
}
jsfiddle link of this sample.
Just do this:
var $div = $('div');
var a = 0;
setInterval(function() {
a++;
$div.stop(true,true).css("left", a);
}, 1000 / 30);
Inactive browser tabs buffer some of the setInterval or setTimeout functions.
stop(true,true) will stop all buffered events and execute immediatly only the last animation.
The window.setTimeout() method now clamps to send no more than one timeout per second in inactive tabs. In addition, it now clamps nested timeouts to the smallest value allowed by the HTML5 specification: 4 ms (instead of the 10 ms it used to clamp to).
For me it's not important to play audio in the background like for others here, my problem was that I had some animations and they acted like crazy when you were in other tabs and coming back to them. My solution was putting these animations inside if that is preventing inactive tab:
if (!document.hidden){ //your animation code here }
thanks to that my animation was running only if tab was active.
I hope this will help someone with my case.
I think that a best understanding about this problem is in this example: http://jsfiddle.net/TAHDb/
I am doing a simple thing here:
Have a interval of 1 sec and each time hide the first span and move it to last, and show the 2nd span.
If you stay on page it works as it is supposed.
But if you hide the tab for some seconds, when you get back you will see a weired thing.
Its like all events that didn't ucur during the time you were inactive now will ocur all in 1 time. so for some few seconds you will get like X events. they are so quick that its possible to see all 6 spans at once.
So it seams chrome only delays the events, so when you get back all events will occur but all at once...
A pratical application were this ocur iss for a simple slideshow. Imagine the numbers being Images, and if user stay with tab hidden when he came back he will see all imgs floating, Totally mesed.
To fix this use the stop(true,true) like pimvdb told.
THis will clear the event queue.
Heavily influenced by Ruslan Tushov's library, I've created my own small library. Just add the script in the <head> and it will patch setInterval and setTimeout with ones that use WebWorker.
Playing an audio file ensures full background Javascript performance for the time being
For me, it was the simplest and least intrusive solution - apart from playing a faint / almost-empty sound, there are no other potential side effects
You can find the details here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/51191818/914546
(From other answers, I see that some people use different properties of the Audio tag, I do wonder whether it's possible to use the Audio tag for full performance, without actually playing something)
I bring here a simple solution for anyone who is trying to get around this problem in a timer function, where as #kbtzr mentioned in another answer we can use the Date object instead of fixed increments to calculate the time that has passed since the beginning, which will work even if you are out from the application's tab.
This is the example HTML.
<body>
<p id="time"></p>
</body>
Then this JavaScript:
let display = document.querySelector('#time')
let interval
let time
function startTimer() {
let initialTime = new Date().getTime()
interval = setInterval(() => {
let now = new Date().getTime()
time = (now - initialTime) + 10
display.innerText = `${Math.floor((time / (60 * 1000)) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60)}:${Math.floor((time / 10) % 100)}`
}, 10)
}
startTimer()
That way, even if the interval value is increased for performance reasons of inactive tabs, the calculation made will guarantee the correct time. This is a vanilla code, but I used this logic in my React application, and you can modify it for wherever you need as well.
It is quite old question but I encountered the same issue.
If you run your web on chrome, you could read through this post Background Tabs in Chrome 57.
Basically the interval timer could run if it haven't run out of the timer budget.
The consumption of budget is based on CPU time usage of the task inside timer.
Based on my scenario, I draw video to canvas and transport to WebRTC.
The webrtc video connection would keep updating even the tab is inactive.
However you have to use setInterval instead of requestAnimationFrame but itt is not recommended for UI rendering though.
It would be better to listen visibilityChange event and change render mechenism accordingly.
Besides, you could try what Kaan Soral suggests and it should works based on the documentation.
I modified Lacerda's response, by adding a functioning UI.
I added start/resume/pause/stop actions.
const
timer = document.querySelector('.timer'),
timerDisplay = timer.querySelector('.timer-display'),
toggleAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="toggle"]'),
stopAction = timer.querySelector('[data-action="stop"]'),
tickRate = 10;
let intervalId, initialTime, pauseTime = 0;
const now = () => new Date().getTime();
const formatTime = (hours, minutes, seconds) =>
[hours, minutes, seconds]
.map(v => `${isNaN(v) ? 0 : v}`.padStart(2, '0'))
.join(':');
const update = () => {
let
time = (now() - initialTime) + 10,
hours = Math.floor((time / (60000)) % 60),
minutes = Math.floor((time / 1000) % 60),
seconds = Math.floor((time / 10) % 100);
timerDisplay.textContent = formatTime(hours, minutes, seconds);
};
const
startTimer = () => {
initialTime = now();
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
resumeTimer = () => {
initialTime = now() - (pauseTime - initialTime);
intervalId = setInterval(update, tickRate);
},
pauseTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
pauseTime = now();
},
stopTimer = () => {
clearInterval(intervalId);
intervalId = null;
initialTime = undefined;
pauseTime = 0;
},
restartTimer = () => {
stopTimer();
startTimer();
};
const setButtonState = (button, state, text) => {
button.dataset.state = state;
button.textContent = text;
};
const
handleToggle = (e) => {
switch (e.target.dataset.state) {
case 'pause':
setButtonState(e.target, 'resume', 'Resume');
pauseTimer();
break;
case 'resume':
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
resumeTimer();
break;
default:
setButtonState(e.target, 'pause', 'Pause');
restartTimer();
}
},
handleStop = (e) => {
stopTimer();
update();
setButtonState(toggleAction, 'initial', 'Start');
};
toggleAction.addEventListener('click', handleToggle);
stopAction.addEventListener('click', handleStop);
update();
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
body {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background: #000;
}
.timer {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-display {
font-family: monospace;
font-size: 3em;
background: #111;
color: #8F8;
border: thin solid #222;
padding: 0.25em;
}
.timer .timer-actions {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
gap: 0.5em;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action] {
font-family: monospace;
width: 6em;
border: thin solid #444;
background: #222;
color: #EEE;
padding: 0.5em;
cursor: pointer;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.timer .timer-actions button[data-action]:hover {
background: #444;
border: thin solid #666;
color: #FFF;
}
<div class="timer">
<div class="timer-display"></div>
<div class="timer-actions">
<button data-action="toggle" data-state="initial">Start</button>
<button data-action="stop">Stop</button>
</div>
</div>
Note: This solution is not suitable if you like your interval works on the background, for example, playing audio or something else. But if you are confused for example about your animation not working properly when coming back to your page or tab, this is a good solution.
There are many ways to achieve this goal, maybe the "WebWorkers" is the most standard one but certainly, it's not the easiest and handy one, especially If you don't have enough Time, so you can try this way:
The basic concept:
build a name for your interval(or animation) and set your interval(animation), so it would run when user first time open your page : var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
by $(window).focus(function() {}); and $(window).blur(function() {}); you can clearInterval(interval_id) everytime browser(tab) is deactived and ReRun your interval(animation) everytime browser(tab) would acive again by interval_id = setInterval();
Sample code:
var interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
$(window).focus(function() {
interval_id = setInterval(your_func, 3000);
});
$(window).blur(function() {
clearInterval(interval_id);
interval_id = 0;
});
Here's my rough solution
(function(){
var index = 1;
var intervals = {},
timeouts = {};
function postMessageHandler(e) {
window.postMessage('', "*");
var now = new Date().getTime();
sysFunc._each.call(timeouts, function(ind, obj) {
var targetTime = obj[1];
if (now >= targetTime) {
obj[0]();
delete timeouts[ind];
}
});
sysFunc._each.call(intervals, function(ind, obj) {
var startTime = obj[1];
var func = obj[0];
var ms = obj[2];
if (now >= startTime + ms) {
func();
obj[1] = new Date().getTime();
}
});
}
window.addEventListener("message", postMessageHandler, true);
window.postMessage('', "*");
function _setTimeout(func, ms) {
timeouts[index] = [func, new Date().getTime() + ms];
return index++;
}
function _setInterval(func, ms) {
intervals[index] = [func, new Date().getTime(), ms];
return index++;
}
function _clearInterval(ind) {
if (intervals[ind]) {
delete intervals[ind]
}
}
function _clearTimeout(ind) {
if (timeouts[ind]) {
delete timeouts[ind]
}
}
var intervalIndex = _setInterval(function() {
console.log('every 100ms');
}, 100);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('run after 200ms');
}, 200);
_setTimeout(function() {
console.log('closing the one that\'s 100ms');
_clearInterval(intervalIndex)
}, 2000);
window._setTimeout = _setTimeout;
window._setInterval = _setInterval;
window._clearTimeout = _clearTimeout;
window._clearInterval = _clearInterval;
})();
I was able to call my callback function at minimum of 250ms using audio tag and handling its ontimeupdate event. Its called 3-4 times in a second. Its better than one second lagging setTimeout
There is a workaround for this problem, although actually the tab must be made active in some window.
Make your inactive tab a separate browser window.
Don't make any other window maximized (unless the maximized window is behind yours).
This should give the browser the impression of always being active.
This is bit cumbersome, but also a quick win. Provided one has control over windows arrangement.