Service worker throwing an net::ERR_FILE_EXISTS error? - javascript

service-worker.js:1 GET http://localhost:8080/service-worker.js net::ERR_FILE_EXISTS
This is the error I get every time I refresh after registering a service worker. I've made sure that the service-worker.js file exists in the root directory. Also the service worker is registered and working fine. But I still keep getting this error. Also I'm working on localhost.
This is my service-worker.js file:
console.log("SW startup");
var CACHE_NAME = "my_cache";
var urlsToCache = [
'./',
'./css/style.css',
'./js/script.js'
];
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
// Perform install steps
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
console.log('Opened cache');
return cache.addAll(urlsToCache);
})
);
});
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME).then(function(cache) {
return cache.match(event.request).then(function (response) {
return response || fetch(event.request.clone()).then(function(response) {
console.dir(response);
console.log('hi');
cache.put(event.request.clone(), response.clone());
return response;
});
});
})
);
});
script.js file:
if (navigator.serviceWorker) {
console.log("ServiceWorkers are supported");
navigator.serviceWorker.register('service-worker.js')
.then(function(reg) {
console.log("ServiceWorker registered ◕‿◕");
console.dir(reg);
})
.catch(function(error) {
console.log("Failed to register ServiceWorker ಠ_ಠ");
console.dir(error);
});
}

I'm seeing the same issue. It can safely be ignored.
This bug tracks removing the noise from Chrome: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=541797
It should be live starting with Chrome 50.
From thread:
Improve error code for service worker bailing due to no update found
ServiceWorkerWriteToCacheJob is the URLRequestJob responsible for
fetching and writing the updated script. It fails with network error
when it wants to abort the update because the new script is the same
as the old one.
Currently that results in ERR_FAILED errors appearing in the DevTools
console and netlog, which is confusing and hard to debug because that
error also occurs for actual network errors. This patch changes the
error to FILE_EXISTS, so it's more clear why the job "failed".

Related

Service Worker not stopping initial requests and only appears to be used once

I asked a question last week about this and got a very helpful answer but I am still struggling to get this working as it is supposed to, although at this point I'm not entirely sure what I've been asked to do is possible.
So this service worker is supposed to activate when ?testMode=true is added to the URL and this seems to be happening okay. The service worker is then supposed to intercept specific requests before they happen and then redirect it to mock data instead. What I have got at the moment will store the mock data and call it when specific requests are made but it doesn't actually stop the initial request from happening as it still appears within the network tab.
So for example if the request contains /units/all?availability=Active&roomTypeHandle=kitchens, the service worker is meant to intercept this and instead of that request going through, mock-data/unitData.json is supposed to be used instead.
This is what I have so far:
TestMode.ts
class TestMode {
constructor() {
if (!this.isEnabled()) {
return;
}
if (!('serviceWorker' in navigator)) {
console.log('Browser does not support service workers');
return;
}
this.init();
}
private init(): void {
navigator.serviceWorker
.register('planner-worker/js/worker.min.js')
.then(this.handleRegistration)
.catch((error) => { throw new Error('Service Worker registration failed: ' + error.message); });
navigator.serviceWorker.addEventListener('message', event => {
// event is a MessageEvent object
console.log(`The service worker sent me a message: ${event.data}`);
});
navigator.serviceWorker.ready.then( registration => {
if (!registration.active) {
console.log('failed to communicate')
return;
}
registration.active.postMessage("Hi service worker");
});
}
private handleRegistration(registration: ServiceWorkerRegistration): void {
registration.update();
console.log('Registration successful, scope is:', registration.scope);
}
private isEnabled(): boolean {
return locationService.hasParam('testMode');
}
}
export default new TestMode();
serviceWorker.js
const CACHE_NAME = 'mockData-cache';
const MOCK_DATA = {
'/units/all?availability=Active&roomTypeHandle=kitchens': 'mock-data/unitData.json',
'/frontal-ranges/kitchens?' : 'mock-data/kitchensData.json',
'/carcase-ranges/?availability=Active&roomTypeHandle=kitchens' : 'mock-data/carcaseRangesData.json',
'/products/830368/related?roomTypeHandle=kitchens&productStateHandle=Active&limit=1000&campaignPhaseId=183&retailStore=Finishing%20Touches%20%28Extra%29'
: 'mock-data/relatedItems.json'
};
self.addEventListener('install', event => {
console.log('Attempting to install service worker and cache static assets');
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(cache => {
return cache.addAll(Object.values(MOCK_DATA));
})
);
});
self.addEventListener('activate', function(event) {
return self.clients.claim();
});
self.addEventListener('fetch', (event) => {
const url = new URL(event.request.url);
const pathAndQuery = url.pathname + url.search;
if (pathAndQuery in MOCK_DATA) {
const cacheKey = MOCK_DATA[pathAndQuery];
event.respondWith(
caches.match(cacheKey, {
cacheName: CACHE_NAME,
})
);
}
});
Another thing that happens which I'm not sure how to get around is that the fetch event only happens once. By that I mean that when a change is made to serviceWorker.js, the mock data is stored in the cache and the files appear in the network tab of dev tools, but if I refresh the page, or close it and reopen in another tab, the mock data is no longer in the network tab and it's as if the service worker is not being used at all. How can I update this so that it's always used? I can see in the console log that the service worker is registered, but it just don't seem to get used.
Apologies if I shouldn't be asking 2 questions in 1 post, just really not sure how to solve my issue. Thanks in advance for any guidance.
Turns out my issue was a scope one. Once moving where the service worker was stored it started working as intended. Realised this was the case as I figured out the fetch event wasn't actually firing.

Blank Service worker script

The service worker script is blank
I am trying to implement service workers into my web app however i noticed nothing was working. I get confirmation that the service worker starts however when i try to view it in the chrome tools it shows a blank document. All efforts to console log etc are unsuccessful which is leading me to believe that the file is truly blank despite it obviously not being.
I have tried unregistered the service worker and updating manually.
SCRIPT ON INDEX
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('sw_basic.js')
.then(function(reg) {
// registration worked
console.log('Registration succeeded. Scope is ' + reg.scope);
}).catch(function(error) {
// registration failed
console.log('Registration failed with ' + error);
});
}
SERVICE WORKER SCRIPT
var CACHE_NAME = 'my-site-cache-v1';
var urlsToCache = [
'./', './index.php',
'./profile.php',
'./support.php',
'./img/dance3-min.png',
'./css/agency',
'./css/agency.min.css',
'./css/eventform.css',
'./css/loginmodal.css',
'./css/profile.css',
'./css/support.css',
'./css/table.css',
'./css/timer.css'
]
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
console.log('Opened Cache');
return cache.addAll(urlsToCache);
})
);
});
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event)) {
event.respondWith(
caches.match(event.request)
.then(function(response) {
if (response) {
console.log('Successfully fetched resource from chache: ${event.request.url}');
return response;
} else {
console.error('Failed to fetch resource: ${event.request.url}');
}
return fetch(event.request);
}
)
)
}
EDIT* I have gotten it to update by changing the name of the js file and manually unregistering the service worker in chrome however it doesn't always update this way sometimes requiring several attempts
I still feel like there must be a better way for doing this and in all the tutorials / documentation it seems like it should install the new one and activate once all tabs are unloaded but its not even installing the updated one at all.
EDIT*
I noticed the service worker tries to install and then disappears.
Example- Service worker #12 is active and running. I refresh and then for a second service worker #24 is installing and then suddenly its gone. At this point i really don't know whats going on other feeds are saying its a problem with the cache max age but I have it set to 0 in the htaccess
Cache-Control: max-age= 0
EDIT*
I have tried taking the service worker onto a different page remove the caching and just try to get it to update.
Currently my index looks like
<html>
<head>
<script>
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/beta/sw.js', {scope: '/beta/'})
.then(function(reg) {
// registration worked
console.log('Registration succeeded. Scope is ' + reg.scope);
}).catch(function(error) {
// registration failed
console.log('Registration failed with ' + error);
});
}
</script>
</head>
online page v2.0
</html>
and the service worker looks like
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
console.log("SW installed");
});
self.addEventListener('activate', function(event) {
console.log("SW activated");
});
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
console.log("Hijacked Signal");
event.respondWith(new Response("offline page"));
});
This Works when the user refreshes after visiting the page the text changes from online to offline. The problem occurs when i change the desired text (eg to offline 2.0). Anyone who has already visited the website is running the old service worker and so will see offline and not offline 2.0
a link to the page if anyone wishes to see whats going on
https://pakcollegelive.tk/beta/index.php
It turns out Cloudflare wasn't playing nice with the service worker files for whatever reason. It wasn't imperative that Cloudflare was used in my case so disabling it fixed the problem.

Show offline cache when server is unreachable

Is it possible to show an offline cache of my website when the server is down?
All the examples I can find regarding offline pages has to do with the client being offline. What I need is to show the user a cached version of my site if the server can't be reached.
I've read about the Cache Manifest in HMTL 5 but it's getting removed and it causes to many problems.
What can be done without using any other loadbalancing servers and such?
I recently learned that with Fetch API and service workers its dead simple:
First, you register the Service worker:
if (!navigator.serviceWorker) return;
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js')
Then configure it to cache whats needed:
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(staticCacheName).then(function(cache) {
return cache.addAll([
'/',
'js/main.js',
'css/main.css',
'imgs/icon.png',
]);
})
);
});
And use Fetch API to get cached peaces if no response from the call:
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
caches.match(event.request).then(function(response) {
return response || fetch(event.request);
})
);
});
if need to get cached version only if server is down, try something like:
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
return fetch(event.request).then(function(response) {
if (response.status !== 200) {
caches.match(event.request).then(function(response) {
return response;
}).catch(function(error) {
console.error('Fetching failed:', error);
throw error;
});
})
);
});
p.s. using Fetch API seems much nicer way than implementing old and nasty XMLHttpRequest.

JS Service Worker running on pages I don't want it to run on

I just started trying to use service workers to cache files from my web server. I'm using the exact code that google suggests HERE. I uploaded the service worker script to my sites root folder and have included a link to it in the pages I want the service worker to cache files on.
I was under the impression that the service worker only caches files that are in the urlsToCache variable, and the service worker would only work on pages where the service worker script is called (linked to).
I have several pages on my site that I don't want the service worker to do anything on. However, it seems that it's still being referenced somehow. The pages in question do not contain a link to my service worker script at all. I've noticed that each time I run an AJAX command using the POST method I receive the following error in my console:
Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Request method 'POST' is unsupported
at service-worker.js:40
at anonymous
line 40 is this snippet of code: cache.put(event.request, responseToCache);
The url my AJAX call is pointing to does not contain a link to my service worker script either.
So my question is a two parter.
1.) Does anyone understand the error message I'm receiving and know how to fix it?
2.) Why is my service worker script running on pages that don't even link to the script in the first place?
Here is the full service worker script I'm using:
var CACHE_NAME = 'my-site-cache-v1';
var urlsToCache = [
'assets/scripts/script1.js',
'assets/scripts/script2.js',
'assets/scripts/script3.js'
];
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
// Perform install steps
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
console.log('Opened cache');
return cache.addAll(urlsToCache);
})
);
});
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
caches.match(event.request)
.then(function(response) {
if (response) {
return response;
}
var fetchRequest = event.request.clone();
return fetch(fetchRequest).then(
function(response) {
// Check if we received a valid response
if(!response || response.status !== 200 || response.type !== 'basic') {
return response;
}
var responseToCache = response.clone();
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
cache.put(event.request, responseToCache);
});
return response;
}
);
})
);
});
Once a service worker is installed it runs independently of your website, means all requests will go through the fetch-eventhandler, your service worker controls also the other pages.
Not only the urlsToCache are cached, the service worker also caches responses on the fly as soon as they were fetched in the fetch-eventhandler (line 38-41)
This also leads to the answer for your first question. Your code caches all responses independent of the http method, but as the error message says http POST response cannot be cached.

Use ServiceWorker cache only when offline

I'm trying to integrate service workers into my app, but I've found the service worker tries to retrieve cached content even when online, but I want it to prefer the network in these situations. How can I do this? Below is the code I have now, but I don't believe it is working. SW Install code is omitted for brevity.
var CACHE_NAME = 'my-cache-v1';
var urlsToCache = [
/* my cached file list */
];
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
// Perform install steps
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
console.log('Opened cache');
return cache.addAll(urlsToCache);
})
);
});
/* request is being made */
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
//first try to run the request normally
fetch(event.request).catch(function() {
//catch errors by attempting to match in cache
return caches.match(event.request).then(function(response) {
// Cache hit - return response
if (response) {
return response;
}
});
})
);
});
This seems to lead to warnings like The FetchEvent for "[url]" resulted in a network error response: an object that was not a Response was passed to respondWith(). I'm new to service workers, so apologies for any mistaken terminology or bad practices, would welcome any tips. Thank you!
Without testing this out, my guess is that you're not resolving respondWith() correctly in the case where there is no cache match. According to MDN, the code passed to respondWith() is supposed to "resolve by returning a Response or network error to Fetch." So why not try just doing this:
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
fetch(event.request).catch(function() {
return caches.match(event.request);
})
);
});
Why don't you open the cache for your fetch event?
I think the process of a service worker is :
Open your cache
Check if the request match with an answer in your cache
Then you answer
OR (if the answer is not in the cache) :
Check the request via the network
Clone your answer from the network
Put the request and the clone of the answer in your cache for future use
I would write :
self.addEventListener('fetch', event => {
event.respondWith(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME).then(cache => {
return cache.match(event.request).then(response => {
return response || fetch(event.request)
.then(response => {
const responseClone = response.clone();
cache.put(event.request, responseClone);
})
})
}
);
});
event.respondWith() expects a promise that resolves to Response. So in case of a cache miss, you still need to return a Response, but above, you are returning nothing. I'd also try to use the cache first, then fetch, but in any case, as the last resort, you can always create a synthetic Response, for example something like this:
return new Response("Network error happened", {"status" : 408, "headers" : {"Content-Type" : "text/plain"}});

Categories

Resources