I am trying to target the second child element of my table. In this case, I would want to write the inner HTML of the second cell of the row, which is "Travolta." I've used the firstChildElement and lastChildElement with success, but having trouble targeting the second one. Any help would be appreciated! Example code can be found below:
HTML:
<tr class="table-row">
<td>John</td>
<td>Travolta</td>
<td>j.travolta#gmail.com</td>
</tr>
Javascript:
var rowTag = document.getElementsByClassName("table-row");
document.write(rowTag[0].firstElementChild.innerHTML);
--> returns "John"
document.write(rowTag[0].lastElementChild.innerHTML);
--> returns "j.travolta#gmail.com"
Since it's the second element child, perhaps use children[1] (it's a 0-based collection):
var text = rowTag[0].children[1].innerHTML;
Note that firstElementChild and children are supported on modern browsers, but if you have to support IE8, you're stuck with writing a function to skip past non-element nodes.
Get innerHTML like this
var tr = document.getElementsByClassName('table-row');
alert(tr[0].getElementsByTagName('td')[1].innerHTML);
Perhaps rowTag[0].firstElementChild.nextElementSibling.innerHTML
There is a CSS selector, nth-child().
Just put the child number inside the parenthesis.
Using JQuery, here's how this would solve your problem:
$('tr.table-row>td:nth-child(2)') is a straightforward selector to retrieve the required element using JQuery. To set its HTML is simply a matter of using the html() function like this:
$("tr.table-row>td:nth-child(2)").html("SET HTML HERE");
Related
what's the different between using:
// assuming using elements/tags 'span' creates an array and want to access its first node
1) var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('elementName')[0]; // also tried property items()
vs
// assuming I assign an id value to the first span element/tag
// specifically calling a node by using it's id value
2) var idAccess = document.getElementById('idValue');
then if I want to change the text node....when using example 1) it will not work, for example:
arrayAccess.firstChild.nodeValue = 'some text';
or
arrayAccess.innerText/innerHTML/textContent = 'some text';
If I "access" the node through its id value then it seems to work fine....
Why is it that when using array it does not work? I'm new to javascript and the book I'm reading does not provide an answer.
Both are working,
In your first case you need to pass the tag name instead of the element name. Then only it will work.
There might be a case that you trying to set input/form elements using innerHTML. At that moment you need to use .value instead of innerHTML.
InnerHTML should be used for div, span, td and similar elements.
So your html markup example:
<div class="test">test</div>
<div class="test">test1</div>
<span id="test">test2</span>
<button id="abc" onclick="renderEle();">Change Text</button>
Your JS code:
function renderEle() {
var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('div')[0];
arrayAccess.innerHTML = "changed Text";
var idEle = document.getElementById('test');
idEle.innerHTML = "changed this one as well";
}
Working Fiddle
When you use document.getElementsByTagName('p'), the browser traverses the rendered DOM tree and returns a node list (array) of all elements that have the matching tag.
When you use document.getElementById('something'), the browser traverses the rendered DOM tree and returns a single node matching the ID if it exists (since html ID's are unique).
There are many differences when to use which, but one main factor will be speed (getElementById is much faster since you're only searching for 1 item).
To address your other question, you already have specified that you want the first element in the returned nodeList (index [0]) in your function call:
var arrayAccess = document.getElementsByTagName('elementName')[0];
Therefore, arrayAccess is already set to the first element in the returned query. You should be able to access the text by the following. The same code should work if you used document.getElementById to get the DOM element:
console.log(arrayAccess.textContent);
Here's a fiddle with an example:
http://jsfiddle.net/qoe30w2w/
Hope this helps!
I've been using jQuery for a while but this is a new one. A simplified example:
HTML
<div class='custom'></div>
<div class='custom'></div>
<div class='custom'></div>
jQuery:
var $customElems = $('.custom'),
$spanOuter = $('<span class="outer"/>'),
$spanInner = $('<span class="inner"/>');
$customElems.each( function() {
$(this).wrap($spanOuter).after($spanInner);
});
JSFiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/a3ZK8/
I would have expected the 'inner' span to be added to all three elements in the selection but it gets always inserted into the last one only (no matter how many). I tried it with .before(), with and without the chaining, same result. What am I missing??
The problem is you are using a reference to a jQuery object.
Hence you keep moving the object reference around within each iteration.
If you have no events attached or no need for the span to be a jQuery object then just pass the parameter as a HTML string literal instead of an object reference
Cloning a jQuery object that doesn't need to be a jQuery object in the first place is just redundant processing and unnecessary overhead.
Change your jQuery object to a string similar to this:
spanInnerString = '<span class="inner"/>';
and your method like this:
$(this).wrap($spanOuter).after(spanInner);
The result is:
<span class="outer"><div class="custom"></div><span class="inner"></span></span>
<span class="outer"><div class="custom"></div><span class="inner"></span></span>
<span class="outer"><div class="custom"></div><span class="inner"></span></span>
DEMO - Passing parameter as HTML string
Off course, the same goes for the outer span. Don't create jQuery objects unless you have to.
If you must use a jQuery object because you want to attach events to the span or similar, than cloning is the way to go, though make sure you use clone(true, true) then to also clone the attached events.
You need to clone the element. Otherwise, after() will relocate the same element 3 times, which results in it being attached to only the last looped element.
$customElems.each(function () {
$(this).wrap($spanOuter).after($spanInner.clone());
});
Demo: Fiddle
You might ask, "Why would wrap() work?" That's because 'wrap()' internally clones the element.
You're moving the same span from place to place. If you acted on all three divs at once, jquery will instead clone the span.
http://jsfiddle.net/a3ZK8/1/
var $customElems = $('.custom'),
$spanOuter = $('<span class="outer"/>'),
$spanInner = $('<span class="inner"/>');
$customElems.wrap($spanOuter).after($spanInner);
From the documentation for .after:
Important: If there is more than one target element, cloned
copies of the inserted element will be created for each target except
for the last one.
which means the last element will always get the original, while all other selected elements will get a clone. That's why when you acted on one element at a time, it simply moved the same span around.
I am writing a custom script for a forum I frequently visit. It is designed to remove signatures from the board when I view it because they are distracting and annoying and they have no way to disable them in the options.
Anyway, I can run custom scripts using a helpful Chrome extension. I am able to modify any portions of the page where HTML nodes have classes, IDs, or even attributes with a little bit of unique information, but I can't seem to figure out how to select and remove the following HTML with jQuery.
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<!--Signature-->
<div class="resultText">
<!-- sig -->
<div>Signature text</div>
<!-- / sig -->
</div>
</td>
</tr>
If there was a way I could grab the parent of <!--Signature--> that would be perfect but I'm not sure that's even possible.
There is one class resultText but that class is used wherever there is text entered by the user, not just in the signature. So I can't grab onto that.
Even if the resultText class is used elsewhere, I'd still recommend using a class selector as a starting point, otherwise you will be looking for comment nodes in the entire document.
From the matched elements, you can get their parents' contents(), use filter() to isolate the comment nodes (their nodeType property is equal to 8) and compare the value of these nodes to your Signature string:
$(".resultText").parent().each(function() {
var $this = $(this);
var signature = $this.contents().filter(function() {
return this.nodeType == 8 && this.nodeValue == "Signature";
});
if (signature.length) {
// Signature found, $this is the <td> element.
$this.closest("tr").remove(); // For example.
}
});
You can use .contents() to get all the child nodes of an element: http://api.jquery.com/contents
From the docs:
Get the children of each element in the set of matched elements,
including text and comment nodes.
$('tr').each(function (index, obj) {
$(this).children('td').contents();//this selects all the nodes in each TD element in the table, including comment nodes
});
Here is a demo: http://jsfiddle.net/NLhz9/1/
Since the script is basically just for you, use xpath to find the comments.
Try something like this:
var comment, comments = document.evaluate('//comment()', document);
while ((comment=comments.iterateNext())) {
if (comment.data=='Signature') { // found one
comment.parentNode.parentNode.removeChild(comment.parentNode);
}
}
<div onclick="test(this)">
Test
<div id="child">child</div>
</div>
I want to change the style of the child div when the parent div is clicked. How do I reference it? I would like to be able to reference it by ID as the the html in the parent div could change and the child won't be the first child etc.
function test(el){
el.childNode["child"].style.display = "none";
}
Something like that, where I can reference the child node by id and set the style of it.
Thanks.
EDIT: Point taken with IDs needing to be unique. So let me revise my question a little. I would hate to have to create unique IDs for every element that gets added to the page. The parent div is added dynamically. (sort of like a page notes system). And then there is this child div. I would like to be able to do something like this: el.getElementsByName("options").item(0).style.display = "block";
If I replace el with document, it works fine, but it doesn't to every "options" child div on the page. Whereas, I want to be able to click the parent div, and have the child div do something (like go away for example).
If I have to dynamically create a million (exaggerated) div IDs, I will, but I would rather not. Any ideas?
In modern browsers (IE8, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari) you can use querySelector():
function test(el){
el.querySelector("#child").style.display = "none";
}
For older browsers (<=IE7), you would have to use some sort of library, such as Sizzle or a framework, such as jQuery, to work with selectors.
As mentioned, IDs are supposed to be unique within a document, so it's easiest to just use document.getElementById("child").
This works well:
function test(el){
el.childNodes.item("child").style.display = "none";
}
If the argument of item() function is an integer, the function will treat it as an index. If the argument is a string, then the function searches for name or ID of element.
If the child is always going to be a specific tag then you could do it like this
function test(el)
{
var children = el.getElementsByTagName('div');// any tag could be used here..
for(var i = 0; i< children.length;i++)
{
if (children[i].getAttribute('id') == 'child') // any attribute could be used here
{
// do what ever you want with the element..
// children[i] holds the element at the moment..
}
}
}
document.getElementById('child') should return you the correct element - remember that id's need to be unique across a document to make it valid anyway.
edit : see this page - ids MUST be unique.
edit edit : alternate way to solve the problem :
<div onclick="test('child1')">
Test
<div id="child1">child</div>
</div>
then you just need the test() function to look up the element by id that you passed in.
If you want to find specific child DOM element use method querySelectorAll
var $form = document.getElementById("contactFrm");
in $form variable we can search which child element we want :)
For more details about how to use querySelectorAll check this page
Let's say:
<div>
pre text
<div class="remove-just-this">
<p>child foo</p>
<p>child bar</p>
nested text
</div>
post text
</div>
to this:
<div>
pre text
<p>child foo</p>
<p>child bar</p>
nested text
post text
</div>
I've been figuring out using Mootools, jQuery and even (raw) JavaScript, but couldn't get the idea how to do this.
Using jQuery you can do this:
var cnt = $(".remove-just-this").contents();
$(".remove-just-this").replaceWith(cnt);
Quick links to the documentation:
contents( ) : jQuery
replaceWith( content : [String | Element | jQuery] ) : jQuery
The library-independent method is to insert all child nodes of the element to be removed before itself (which implicitly removes them from their old position), before you remove it:
while (nodeToBeRemoved.firstChild)
{
nodeToBeRemoved.parentNode.insertBefore(nodeToBeRemoved.firstChild,
nodeToBeRemoved);
}
nodeToBeRemoved.parentNode.removeChild(nodeToBeRemoved);
This will move all child nodes to the correct place in the right order.
You should make sure to do this with the DOM, not innerHTML (and if using the jQuery solution provided by jk, make sure that it moves the DOM nodes rather than using innerHTML internally), in order to preserve things like event handlers.
My answer is a lot like insin's, but will perform better for large structures (appending each node separately can be taxing on redraws where CSS has to be reapplied for each appendChild; with a DocumentFragment, this only occurs once as it is not made visible until after its children are all appended and it is added to the document).
var fragment = document.createDocumentFragment();
while(element.firstChild) {
fragment.appendChild(element.firstChild);
}
element.parentNode.replaceChild(fragment, element);
$('.remove-just-this > *').unwrap()
More elegant way is
$('.remove-just-this').contents().unwrap();
Use modern JS!
const node = document.getElementsByClassName('.remove-just-this')[0];
node.replaceWith(...node.childNodes); // or node.children, if you don't want textNodes
oldNode.replaceWith(newNode) is valid ES5
...array is the spread operator, passing each array element as a parameter
Replace div with its contents:
const wrapper = document.querySelector('.remove-just-this');
wrapper.outerHTML = wrapper.innerHTML;
<div>
pre text
<div class="remove-just-this">
<p>child foo</p>
<p>child bar</p>
nested text
</div>
post text
</div>
Whichever library you are using you have to clone the inner div before removing the outer div from the DOM. Then you have to add the cloned inner div to the place in the DOM where the outer div was. So the steps are:
Save a reference to the outer div's parent in a variable
Copy the inner div to another variable. This can be done in a quick and dirty way by saving the innerHTML of the inner div to a variable or you can copy the inner tree recursively node by node.
Call removeChild on the outer div's parent with the outer div as the argument.
Insert the copied inner content to the outer div's parent in the correct position.
Some libraries will do some or all of this for you but something like the above will be going on under the hood.
And, since you tried in mootools as well, here's the solution in mootools.
var children = $('remove-just-this').getChildren();
children.replaces($('remove-just-this');
Note that's totally untested, but I have worked with mootools before and it should work.
http://mootools.net/docs/Element/Element#Element:getChildren
http://mootools.net/docs/Element/Element#Element:replaces
I was looking for the best answer performance-wise while working on an important DOM.
eyelidlessness's answer was pointing out that using javascript the performances would be best.
I've made the following execution time tests on 5,000 lines and 400,000 characters with a complexe DOM composition inside the section to remove. I'm using an ID instead of a class for convenient reason when using javascript.
Using $.unwrap()
$('#remove-just-this').contents().unwrap();
201.237ms
Using $.replaceWith()
var cnt = $("#remove-just-this").contents();
$("#remove-just-this").replaceWith(cnt);
156.983ms
Using DocumentFragment in javascript
var element = document.getElementById('remove-just-this');
var fragment = document.createDocumentFragment();
while(element.firstChild) {
fragment.appendChild(element.firstChild);
}
element.parentNode.replaceChild(fragment, element);
147.211ms
Conclusion
Performance-wise, even on a relatively big DOM structure, the difference between using jQuery and javascript is not huge. Surprisingly $.unwrap() is most costly than $.replaceWith().
The tests have been done with jQuery 1.12.4.
if you'd like to do this same thing in pyjamas, here's how it's done. it works great (thank you to eyelidness). i've been able to make a proper rich text editor which properly does styles without messing up, thanks to this.
def remove_node(doc, element):
""" removes a specific node, adding its children in its place
"""
fragment = doc.createDocumentFragment()
while element.firstChild:
fragment.appendChild(element.firstChild)
parent = element.parentNode
parent.insertBefore(fragment, element)
parent.removeChild(element)
If you are dealing with multiple rows, as it was in my use case you are probably better off with something along these lines:
$(".card_row").each(function(){
var cnt = $(this).contents();
$(this).replaceWith(cnt);
});
The solution with replaceWith only works when there is one matching element.
When there are more matching elements use this:
$(".remove-just-this").contents().unwrap();