The code :
$("#button1").click(function(){
$("img").fadeOut();
});
fades out the whole element but I want to fade specific parts of an image like 4px from top and 2px from left .If CSS3 methods are needed , I am ready to do so.
HTML code:
<div class="container">
<div class="image"></div>
<div class="mask width100 height3 top0 left0"></div>
<div class="mask width100 height3 top0 left3"></div>
<div class="mask width3 height54 top10 left22"></div>
<div class="mask width10 height30 top40 left12"></div>
<!-- more masks goes here -->
</div>
CSS code:
.container {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
}
.image {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background: url(/*your url*/);
}
.mask {
position: absolute;
background: #000;
}
.width100 { width: 100% }
.width10 { width: 10% }
.width3 { width: 3% }
/* etc */
height3 { height: 3% }
height30 { height: 30% }
height100 { height: 100% }
/* etc */
top0 { top: 0 }
top5 { top: 5% }
/* etc */
Your masks have absolute positions, and you can set their sides with .widthXX and .heightXX classes + position about the image with .topXX and .leftXX classes. (this is not ideal method, but it can be done fast)
Than with JS you can detect all that masks (with jQuery - $('.mask')) make an array of objects (if it's needed), and hide tham with .hide() or .fadeOut() methods in line order (0,1,2,3...) or randomly (get random index of array, hide it, and delete element from array).
Hope you understood my thoughts, and will make it better and more interesting :)
Related
I am using the skrollr library and I couldnt really find many useful explanations on its official page(github) so Ive been reading on stackoverflow etc. I still have trouble understanding how to use skrollr and its data-attributes.
After researching, I tried to implement 4 things, of which only one works..If anyone could tell me what I am doing wrong and the skrollr data attributes, it would be amazing.
What is the difference of data-100 and data-100p ?
when to use data-start attribute? It does not seem to change anything, whether or not im using it?
I dont quite understand the css requirements to make the animations work-data-attributes without the css is not enough but I confused what to do here.
In my code I tried to do 4 animations:
a. change opacity from 'visible' to not visible (opacity of 0) / works (as the only animation)
b. change opacity but from not visible to visible / does not work
c. make two div's slide away (left to left and right to right) /does not work
d. zoom into the picture while scrolling /dows not work
I made a jsfiddle, so you could see it better and also included my code in here. Thank you!!!
https://jsfiddle.net/codingcodingcoding/44yb72ps/2/
html:
<div class="one" data-0='opacity: 1' data-100='opacity: 0'>
</div>
<div class="two" data-100="opacity: 0" data-200="opacity: 1"></div>
<div class="three">
<div class="three-left" data-200="left: 0%;">
</div>
<div class="three-right" data-200="left: 50%;">
</div>
</div>
<div class="four" data-0='transform: scale(1.0,1.0);' data-150p='transform: scale(1.3, 1.3);opacity: 1;' data-200p='opacity: 0; transform: scale(6, 6);'></div>
<div class='section' data-bottom-top="background-position: 50% 100%" data-top-bottom="background-position: 50% 0%">
</div>
css:
.one {
background-image: url('http://unsplash.imgix.net/reserve/9Fx2auQ4yoHM8OpWA8qw__MG_5265.jpg?fit=crop&fm=jpg&h=700&q=75&w=1050');
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.two {
background-color: red;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.three {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: block;
.three-left {
width: 50%;
height: 100%;
left: 0%;
background-color: green;
}
.three-right {
width: 50%;
height: 100%;
left: 50%;
background-color: yellow;
}
}
-four {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
js:
( function( $ ) {
// Init Skrollr
var s = skrollr.init({
render: function(data) {
}
});
} )( jQuery );
Here is my html and css code snippet:
.clouds {
background-image: url('http://placehold.it/1200x1200');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: block;
}
.cloud-1 {
width: 138px;
height: 83px;
position: absolute;
left: 200px;
top: 350px;
}
.cloud-2 {
width: 100px;
height: 52px;
position: absolute;
left: 625px;
top: 400px;
background-position: -935px -9px;
}
.cloud-3 {
width: 110px;
height: 58px;
position: absolute;
left: 450px;
top: 350px;
background-position: -1033px -6px;
}
<div id="animations">
<div class="clouds cloud-1"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-2"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-3"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-4"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-5"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-6"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-7"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-8"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-9"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-10"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-11"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-12"></div>
<div class="clouds cloud-13"></div>
</div>
What I want to achieve is to move clouds to the website edges when user scrolls down. My clouds is one image sprite, and each cloud is positioned absolutely. Sorry, but I am new to web development and still need to learn a lot.
This is best achieved by Javascript, I think. By using JQuery, this should not be too hard.
Check how far you are scrolled, first:
var scrollPercent = 100 * $('body').scrollTop() / ($('body).height()
that gives you the percentage you've scrolled down. Then, you could do something like:
$('.cloud-1').css('left', (200 / scrollPercent) + 'px');
That will set the image 200 px from left at the start, towards 2 px to the left if the user is down the page.
Update those values on scroll:
$('body').on('scroll', function(){
// methods described above here
}
note
The code is not tested, its a heads up in the right direction. Adjust to your needs, and check out the jquery docs.
your code snippet is not working to me (because you used relative path to your image...) but you should probably do it like that (replace the height with the height the user has to scroll)
JQuery :
$(window).scroll(function() {
var scr = $(window).scrollTop();
var height = 300px;
if(scr > height) {
$(document.body).addClass('fix-clouds'); /* add the class on scroll */
} else {
$(document.body).removeClass('fix-clouds'); /* remove when we go back to top */
}
});
CSS :
.fix-clouds clouds {
your CSS
}
I know we can use calc when lengths are defined:
flex-basis: calc(33.33% - 60px);
left: calc(50% - 25px);
height: calc(100em/5);
But what if a length is variable?
height: calc(100% - <<header with variable height>>);
OR
width: calc(100% - 50px - <<box with variable width>>);
Is there a standard way to do this in CSS?
I know the overall task is possible with flexbox and tables, but I'm wondering if CSS offers a simpler method. Flexbox, tables and simple Javascript are acceptable alternatives.
height demo
width demo
You can use CSS tables:
.wrapper {
display: table;
width: 100%;
margin: 15px 0;
}
.horizontal.wrapper > div {
display: table-cell;
white-space: nowrap; /* Prevent line wrapping */
border: 1px solid;
}
.left { width: 100px } /* Minimum width of 100px */
.center { width: 0; } /* Width given by contents */
.vertical.wrapper { height: 200px; }
.vertical.wrapper > div {
display: table-row;
}
.vertical.wrapper > div > span {
display: table-cell;
border: 1px solid;
}
.top { height: 100px; } /* Minimum heigth of 100px */
.middle { height: 0; } /* Height given by content */
.bottom { height: 100%; } /* As tall as possible */
<div class="horizontal wrapper">
<div class="left">100px wide</div>
<div class="center">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
<div class="vertical wrapper">
<div class="top"><span>100px tall</span></div>
<div class="middle"><span>Auto height, given by contents</span></div>
<div class="bottom"><span>Remaining space</span></div>
</div>
The horizontal case can also be achieved with floats:
#wrapper, .right { overflow: hidden; } /* Establish BFC */
#wrapper > div { border: 1px solid; }
.left, .middle { float: left; }
.left { width: 100px }
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="left">100px</div>
<div class="middle">Auto width, given by contents</div>
<div class="right">Remaining space</div>
</div>
Flexbox can do that.
Support is IE10 and up.
JSfiddle Demo
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
}
#container {
height: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
#top {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
#bottom {
background-color: lightblue;
flex: 1;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="top">green box variable height</div>
<div id="bottom">blue box no longer overflows browser window</div>
</div>
I'm looking for something simple and portable. In the same way a CSS
property can be easily applied across documents, I'm looking for
something similar in terms of ease-of-application for this function.
... isolated fix is preferred.
Horizontal:
This can be achieved using CSS only. As you do not prefer a flex layout solution, the next best bet would be a table layout.
A simple CSS snippet which you could drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child { width: 100%; }
You can then add your site-specific styling to this base CSS as per site requirements. Like, nowrap etc.
Two apparent advantages of this solution are:
You do not need to change your markup and also do not need to decorate all children with classes. Just apply the class flexh to your parent div and that would be it.
Minimal Markup Required:
<div class="flexh">
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
<div>...</div>
</div>
You are not limited to just three columns. You could have as many columns as need be. The first one will have fixed width, the last one will be flexible, and all the columns in-between would get content-based widths.
Demo Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/qqq4mq23/
Demo Snippet:
div.flexh {
display: table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
/* Override your custom styling below */
width: 80%; border: 2px solid black;
border-right: 2px dashed black;
font-size: 1em;
}
div.flexh > div {
display: table-cell; width: auto;
box-sizing: border-box; vertical-align: middle;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 15px 5px;
}
div.flexh > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-width: 75px; width: 75px; max-width: 75px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexh > div:last-child {
width: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable Content Width</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="flexh">
<div>75px Fixed Width</div>
<div>Variable TextWidth</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/128x48/66c' />
<p>Variable ContentWidth</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Width</div>
</div>
Vertical:
This is a bit tricky to achieve without flex layout. A table layout would not work here mainly because, the table-row would not keep a fixed height as required by your use-case. The height on a table-row or table-cell is only an indicative of the minimum height required. If the space is constrained, or the content exceeds the available space, then the cell or row will increase its height depending on the content.
As per the specs here: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#height-layout
The height of a 'table-row' element's box is calculated once the user
agent has all the cells in the row available: it is the maximum of the
row's computed 'height', the computed 'height' of each cell in the
row, and the minimum height (MIN) required by the cells...
...the height of a cell box is the minimum height required by the
content
This effect can be seen here: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/6eropud3/
(Resize the window pane and you will see that the first row will increase in height as the content cannot be fit into the specified height, hence defeating the purpose)
Therefore, you can restrict the height indirectly either using inner markup like a div element, or let go of the table-layout and calculate the height for the flexible one. In your use-case, you prefer not to change the markup, hence I am not proposing an inner markup.
The best-bet here would be to use the time-tested model of plain block-level divs with the height of the flexible one to be calculated. As you have already discovered that it is not possible with CSS, you will need a small JavaScript snippet to do that for you.
A simple JavaScript snippet (no jQuery) which you could wrap in a window.load and drop into your project (and be done with) would look like this:
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
/* iterate the instances on your page */
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children), // get all children
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1), // get the last child
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight; // aggregate the height
});
/* assign the calculated height on the last child */
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
The CSS snippet is more or less like the horizontal one, sans table layout, which also you could just drop into your project and just add the additional site-specific styling. Minimal markup required remains the same.
Demo Fiddle 2: http://jsfiddle.net/abhitalks/Ltcuxdwf/
Demo Snippet:
document.addEventListener("load", flexit);
function flexit(e) {
var flexv = document.querySelectorAll('div.flexv');
[].forEach.call(flexv, function(div) {
var children = [].slice.call(div.children),
flexChild = children.splice(-1, 1),
usedHeight = 0, totalHeight = div.offsetHeight;
children.forEach(function(elem) {
usedHeight += elem.offsetHeight;
});
flexChild[0].style.height = (totalHeight - usedHeight) + 'px';
});
}
div.flexv {
display: inline-table; box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0; margin: 0;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
height: 320px; width: 20%; border: 1px solid black; font-size: 1em;
margin: 8px;
}
div.flexv > div {
display: block; height: auto; box-sizing: border-box;
overflow: hidden;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background-color: lightgreen; border: 1px solid #ddd;
padding: 5px 15px;
}
div.flexv > div:first-child {
/* Override your custom styling below */
min-height: 36px; height: 36px; max-height: 36px;
background-color: orange;
}
div.flexv > div:last-child {
height: 100%;
/* Override your custom styling below */
background: skyblue;
}
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Content Height</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div><img src='//placehold.it/64x72/66c' /></div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
<div class="flexv">
<div>36px Fixed Height</div>
<div>Variable Text Height</div>
<div>
<img src='//placehold.it/72x48/66c' />
<p>Variable Content Height</p>
</div>
<div>Flexible Remaining Height</div>
</div>
Note: As pointed out by #LGSon, the display: inline-table used for the demo does not play well with Firefox. This is only for a demo and should be replaced by either block or inline-block as per your use-case.
Updated
As I commented earlier, and besides flex, this is also solvable using display: table and here is a fiddle demo I made showing that.
If a fixed top also were required for the vertical demo, here is an update of my original display:table version: fiddle demo
Sometimes I haven't been able (or didn't want) to use either flex nor tables, and I have, on and off, looked into making use of css calc() and css attr().
Both come short though, as calc() can only use +-*/ and attr() can only return a string value, which can't be computed by calc().
My suggestion, using plain javascript, is based on that these 2 methods, at some point, might be extended so we can make better use of them.
This is how I would like see them work;
width: calc(100% - attr(this.style.left))
but as they don't, and I can't add it to my css either as it wouldn't validate properly (might even break the parsing, who knows) I added a variant as an attribute on the element instead, with some quirks to make it easier to compute.
And in this case (the 2 demos) it looks like this:
//height
<div id="bottom" data-calcattr="top,height,calc(100% - toppx)">...</div>
//width
<div class="box right" data-calcattr="left,width,calc(100% - leftpx)">...</div>
Together with below script, which by no means is fully developed/tested on all property combinations, it does adjust the div's size.
In short, when runned, it take the attribute, split it into an array, take the first item value as from which property to read, the second to which property to set and the third to which the read value gets inserted/replaced and assigned to the property to be set (hmmm, still working on a better way to express this, but hopefully the script is clear enough with whats going on).
Here is a fiddle showing both the height and width demo, integrated, making use of the same script.
function calcattr() {
var els = document.querySelectorAll('[data-calcattr]');
for (i = 0; i < els.length; i++) {
var what = els[i].getAttribute('data-calcattr');
if (what) {
what = what.split(',');
var rect = els[i].getBoundingClientRect();
var parentrect = els[i].parentNode.getBoundingClientRect();
var brd = window.getComputedStyle(els[i].parentNode,null).getPropertyValue('border-' + what[0] + '-width');
what[2] = what[2].replace(what[0],parseInt(rect[what[0]]-parentrect[what[0]]) - parseInt(brd));
els[i].setAttribute("style", what[1] + ":" + what[2]);
}
}
}
IN CSS
Although I've never tried it, I believe that this would work:
.top {
height:13px;
}
.main {
height:calc(100% - var(height));
}
http://www.creativebloq.com/netmag/why-you-need-use-css-variables-91412904
IN SASS
$top_height: 50px
.main {
height: calc(100% - $top_height)
}
Sass Variable in CSS calc() function
In both cases on container css you should put:
#container {
overflow: hidden;
}
But, it will hide the information that overflows the container. I think that is the point, since you put white-space: nowrap; it means that you don't want to change the height, so you have to hide the text that can't fits the container.
I am looking for some information from some front end experts on how to go about creating a custom wrap around js carousel gallery. The idea is simple really I have a carousel of images, text, or whatever and when I get to the end I want it to wrap around. I don't want the content to simply fadeIn and out to the next piece of content. This is a gallery of div's currently but suppose it's images or whatever have you.
HTML
<div id="outside-container">
<div id="inside-container" class="cf">
<div class="items" id="item1"></div>
<div class="items" id="item2"></div>
<div class="items" id="item3"></div>
<div class="items" id="item4"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="directions">
<h4 id="left-button">Left</h4>
<h4 id="right-button">Right</h4>
</div>
CSS
#outside-container{
display: block;
width: 400px;
height: 125px;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid #000;
margin: 0px auto;
}
#inside-container{
display: block;
width: 800px;
overflow: hidden;
height: 100%;
}
.items{
float: left;
margin: 0px;
width: 200px;
height: 100%;
}
#item1{ background: green; }
#item2{ background: red; }
#item3{ background: blue; }
#item4{ background: yellow; }
#directions{
display: block;
width: 400px;
margin: 0px auto;
text-align: center;
}
#left-button, #right-button{
display: inline-block;
cursor: pointer;
margin: 10px;
}
JS
var move = 0;
$("#left-button").click(function(){
move += 200;
$("#inside-container").animate({
marginLeft: move+"px"
}, 500);
});
$("#right-button").click(function(){
move -= 200;
$("#inside-container").animate({
marginLeft: move+"px"
}, 500);
});
Here is the codepen. So to sum all this up. I am asking for a way to create an infite loop for a gallery. I have always programmed these sorts of things to come to an end and then the user has to go back the other way. If this sounds confusing follow check out the codepen. Thanks in advance.
Here you go
http://codepen.io/nickavi/pen/cpFCE
But for the love of god, please don't use jQuery animate... at least add velocity.js to it, or the GSAP plugin, you don't even have to alter your JS you just add it in and it replaces the animate function with a more efficient one.
Cheers JBSTEW
First set move to the default slider and margin reset amount:
var move = 200;
Then, set the container margin to slide left by the move amount:
var margin_reset = (move * -1) + 'px'
$("#inside-container").css('margin-left', margin_reset);
Then, adjust the animation margin slide using move variable again, and execute a function when the animation is complete that moves the last/first item to the beginning/end of the container using prepend/append.
$("#left-button").click(function(){
$("#inside-container").animate({
marginLeft: 0
}, 500, function() {
$(this).prepend( $(this).find('.items:last') )
.css('margin-left', margin_reset);
});
});
$("#right-button").click(function(){
$("#inside-container").animate({
marginLeft: (move * -2) +"px"
}, 500, function() {
$(this).append( $(this).find('.items:first') )
.css('margin-left', margin_reset);
});
});
To avoid an initial draw jump, you could change the default css #inside-container as:
#inside-container{
...
margin-left: -200px;
}
see: Codepen
I want to make a grid of divs that are the size of the viewport. Just to set a few basic variables, lets say I want it to be 7 divs wide and 10 divs high.
Here is a code I have so far to set the div size:
function height() {
var height = $(window).height();
height = parseInt(height) + 'px';
$(".page").css('height',height);
}
$(document).ready(function() {
height();
$(window).bind('resize', height);
});
function width() {
var width = $(window).width();
width = parseInt(width) + 'px';
$(".page").css('width',width);
}
$(document).ready(function() {
width();
$(window).bind('width', width);
});
Right now I just have 2 divs that are stacked on top of each other. One is red and one is black, just so I can see them. I want to be able to put content inside the divs. I also made sure to put
body {
margin: 0px;
}
Later I am going to put some scrolling features with jQuery but for now I just want a way to make the grid.
Edit:
Each individual div is the size of the viewport
Edit:
I used this handy plugin for the scrolling that is much better then a small script at the end of the page
You won't need any javascript for this as it can be easier achieved with just CSS.
HTML
<div id="content1">
Place your content here.
</div>
<div id="content2">
Place your content here.
</div>
<div id="content3">
Place your content here.
</div>
CSS
* {
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#content1,#content2,#content3 {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important; /*min-height hack*/
height: 100%; /*min-height hack*/
}
EXAMPLE 1
All 3 divs have the size of the browser window and of course they adjust accordingly. Also you can add a anchor link to navigate from tab to tab with again just html/css
Go to Main Element
If a navigation like this is something you would like to have then you can have a look on the
EXAMPLE 2
PS: in the example i have separated the css of the boxes just to put different colors but you can have it as i posted it above.
I've also created another fiddle for you, as my first two versions were missing something...You asked for a couple of divs vertically and a couple horizontally.
EXAMPLE 3
This example has 3x2 divs (6 total) but with the same logic you can make them 7x10.
Please don't hesitate to ask if you don't understand anything in the code.
Also i've added a bit of jQuery to make the scrolling more smooth, which is optional, you can just remove it
JavaScript (don't forget to include jQuery)
var $root = $('html, body');
$('a').click(function () {
$root.animate({
scrollLeft: $($.attr(this, 'href')).offset().left,
scrollTop: $($.attr(this, 'href')).offset().top
}, 500);
return false;
});
Hope this helps you
EDIT: You need to include jQuery in your code and also wrap the javascript code with:
$(window).load(function(){
});
I can't tell if you want the div to be the entire size of the screen and then have the overflow scroll - and shoot over to the next panel, or if you want your grid of divs to be the size of the viewport. If it's the second, here is my answer.
fiddle is here:
HTML
<div class="block">01</div>
<div class="block">02</div>
<div class="block">03</div>
<div class="block">04</div>
<div class="block">05</div>
<div class="block">06</div>
<div class="block">07</div>
<div class="block">etc. (to 70)</div>
CSS
* {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
/* http://www.paulirish.com/2012/box-sizing-border-box-ftw/ */
margin: 0;
}
html {
height: 100%;
background-color: orange;
}
body {
height: 100%;
border: 1px solid blue;
}
.block {
width: 14.285714%%; /* 100/7 */
float: left;
height: 10%; /* 100/10 */
border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,.5);
}
Now, If that's not what you wanted, maybe this is.
fiddle is here:
HTML
<div id="content1" class="block">
<h2>block 01</h2>
</div>
<div id="content2" class="block">
<h2>block 02</h2>
</div>
<div id="content3" class="block">
<h2>block 03</h2>
</div>
<div id="content4" class="block">
<h2>block 04</h2>
</div>
<div id="content5" class="block">
<h2>block 05</h2>
</div>
<div id="content6" class="block">
<h2>block 06</h2>
</div>
<div id="content7" class="block">
<h2>block 07</h2>
</div>
<div id="content8" class="block">
<h2>block 08</h2>
</div>
<!-- you'll need 70... ? -->
<nav class="global-nav">
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
</nav>
CSS ( a little SASS in here for quickness )
* {
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
html {
width: 700%;
/* overflow: hidden; */
/*This would hide the scroll bars but I'm leaving them for you to see */
}
.block {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important; /*min-height hack*/
height: 100%; /*min-height hack*/
width: 100%/7; /* SASS division to be quick*/
float: left;
border: 1px solid red;
}
.global-nav {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
.global-nav a {
display: block;
color: black;
}