Develop Reference

Data structure adding and removing items using constructor functions

Its the beginning of a data structure exercise and I am trying to write an add and remove function -its should be so simple and I don't get why its wrong?! Also the way to do it 8using a constructor function, prototype etc. must stay the way it is)
Any help much appreciated!
function Thestack () {
this.array=[];
}
Thestack.prototype.plus = function (i) {
this.array.push(i);
return this; // cannot be edited
};
Thestack.prototype.minus = function () {
this.array.pop();
};
var smallstack = new Thetack();
smallstack.plus(something); //followed by
smallstack.minus();
should return: something

your minus function does not have a return statement, so it just returns undefined by default
You could as in the add function return this so you can continue chaining of methods, return the element removed or return the length of the remaing array
// return this for chaining
Thestack.prototype.minus = function () {
this.data.pop();
return this;
};
// return the removed item
Thestack.prototype.minus = function () {
//edits the data array in place and returns the last element
return this.data.pop();
};
// return the length of the remaining array
Thestack.prototype.minus = function () {
this.data.pop();
return this.data.length;
};

making a function in an object chainable

I am trying to achieve a chainable object, but cannot figure out how I can do this within a function.
This is how I would like it to work:
$donate.ga('testing').go(value);
My object currently looks like this:
var $donate = {
ga: function (value) {
}
};

You simply need to make each function to return the instance of the object:
var $donate = {
ga: function (value) {
// logic
return this;
}
};

It's already solved here. You must simply return the object in your function.

You need to return the Object like that:
var $donate = {
ga: function (value) {
//after some computation
return this;
},
go: function(val) {
//after some computation
return this;
}
};
If you don't return this (this is a reference to the current Object), you either return undefined or something else and your method defined in your Object is simply out of scope (unknown).

you have to return this; in each sub function before closing it.
for example
Your code
var $donate = {
ga: function (value) {
//perform your code here
return this; // <--- Dont forget to use this before closing the function nest
},
go: function(val) {
//perform your code here
return this; // <--- Dont forget to use this before closing the function nest
}
};

Javascript concatenate a function similar to how text can be added

In javscript we can do this
var text = "the original text";
text+=";Add this on";
If a library has a function already defined (e.g)
//In the js library
library.somefunction = function() {...};
Is there a way to add something on so that I can have two functions run?
var myfunction = function() {...};
Something like:
library.somefunction += myfunction
So that both myfunction() and the original library.somefunction() are both run?

You can use this kind of code (leave scope empty to use default scope):
var createSequence = function(originalFn, newFn, scope) {
if (!newFn) {
return originalFn;
}
else {
return function() {
var result = originalFn.apply(scope || this, arguments);
newFn.apply(scope || this, arguments);
return result;
};
}
}
Then:
var sequence = createSequence(library.somefunction, myFunction);

I think what you want to create is a Hook (function) - you want to call library.somefunction but add a bit of your own code to run before. If that's the case, you can make your myfunction either call or return the library function after it's done with your bit of code.
var myfunction = function() {
// your code
// ...
return library.somefunction();
}

How to overload functions in javascript?

Classical (non-js) approach to overloading:
function myFunc(){
//code
}
function myFunc(overloaded){
//other code
}
Javascript wont let more than one function be defined with the same name. As such, things like this show up:
function myFunc(options){
if(options["overloaded"]){
//code
}
}
Is there a better workaround for function overloading in javascript other than passing an object with the overloads in it?
Passing in overloads can quickly cause a function to become too verbose because each possible overload would then need a conditional statement. Using functions to accomplish the //code inside of those conditional statements can cause tricky situations with scopes.

There are multiple aspects to argument overloading in Javascript:
Variable arguments - You can pass different sets of arguments (in both type and quantity) and the function will behave in a way that matches the arguments passed to it.
Default arguments - You can define a default value for an argument if it is not passed.
Named arguments - Argument order becomes irrelevant and you just name which arguments you want to pass to the function.
Below is a section on each of these categories of argument handling.
Variable Arguments
Because javascript has no type checking on arguments or required qty of arguments, you can just have one implementation of myFunc() that can adapt to what arguments were passed to it by checking the type, presence or quantity of arguments.
jQuery does this all the time. You can make some of the arguments optional or you can branch in your function depending upon what arguments are passed to it.
In implementing these types of overloads, you have several different techniques you can use:
You can check for the presence of any given argument by checking to see if the declared argument name value is undefined.
You can check the total quantity or arguments with arguments.length.
You can check the type of any given argument.
For variable numbers of arguments, you can use the arguments pseudo-array to access any given argument with arguments[i].
Here are some examples:
Let's look at jQuery's obj.data() method. It supports four different forms of usage:
obj.data("key");
obj.data("key", value);
obj.data();
obj.data(object);
Each one triggers a different behavior and, without using this dynamic form of overloading, would require four separate functions.
Here's how one can discern between all these options in English and then I'll combine them all in code:
// get the data element associated with a particular key value
obj.data("key");
If the first argument passed to .data() is a string and the second argument is undefined, then the caller must be using this form.
// set the value associated with a particular key
obj.data("key", value);
If the second argument is not undefined, then set the value of a particular key.
// get all keys/values
obj.data();
If no arguments are passed, then return all keys/values in a returned object.
// set all keys/values from the passed in object
obj.data(object);
If the type of the first argument is a plain object, then set all keys/values from that object.
Here's how you could combine all of those in one set of javascript logic:
// method declaration for .data()
data: function(key, value) {
if (arguments.length === 0) {
// .data()
// no args passed, return all keys/values in an object
} else if (typeof key === "string") {
// first arg is a string, look at type of second arg
if (typeof value !== "undefined") {
// .data("key", value)
// set the value for a particular key
} else {
// .data("key")
// retrieve a value for a key
}
} else if (typeof key === "object") {
// .data(object)
// set all key/value pairs from this object
} else {
// unsupported arguments passed
}
},
The key to this technique is to make sure that all forms of arguments you want to accept are uniquely identifiable and there is never any confusion about which form the caller is using. This generally requires ordering the arguments appropriately and making sure that there is enough uniqueness in the type and position of the arguments that you can always tell which form is being used.
For example, if you have a function that takes three string arguments:
obj.query("firstArg", "secondArg", "thirdArg");
You can easily make the third argument optional and you can easily detect that condition, but you cannot make only the second argument optional because you can't tell which of these the caller means to be passing because there is no way to identify if the second argument is meant to be the second argument or the second argument was omitted so what's in the second argument's spot is actually the third argument:
obj.query("firstArg", "secondArg");
obj.query("firstArg", "thirdArg");
Since all three arguments are the same type, you can't tell the difference between different arguments so you don't know what the caller intended. With this calling style, only the third argument can be optional. If you wanted to omit the second argument, it would have to be passed as null (or some other detectable value) instead and your code would detect that:
obj.query("firstArg", null, "thirdArg");
Here's a jQuery example of optional arguments. both arguments are optional and take on default values if not passed:
clone: function( dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents ) {
dataAndEvents = dataAndEvents == null ? false : dataAndEvents;
deepDataAndEvents = deepDataAndEvents == null ? dataAndEvents : deepDataAndEvents;
return this.map( function () {
return jQuery.clone( this, dataAndEvents, deepDataAndEvents );
});
},
Here's a jQuery example where the argument can be missing or any one of three different types which gives you four different overloads:
html: function( value ) {
if ( value === undefined ) {
return this[0] && this[0].nodeType === 1 ?
this[0].innerHTML.replace(rinlinejQuery, "") :
null;
// See if we can take a shortcut and just use innerHTML
} else if ( typeof value === "string" && !rnoInnerhtml.test( value ) &&
(jQuery.support.leadingWhitespace || !rleadingWhitespace.test( value )) &&
!wrapMap[ (rtagName.exec( value ) || ["", ""])[1].toLowerCase() ] ) {
value = value.replace(rxhtmlTag, "<$1></$2>");
try {
for ( var i = 0, l = this.length; i < l; i++ ) {
// Remove element nodes and prevent memory leaks
if ( this[i].nodeType === 1 ) {
jQuery.cleanData( this[i].getElementsByTagName("*") );
this[i].innerHTML = value;
}
}
// If using innerHTML throws an exception, use the fallback method
} catch(e) {
this.empty().append( value );
}
} else if ( jQuery.isFunction( value ) ) {
this.each(function(i){
var self = jQuery( this );
self.html( value.call(this, i, self.html()) );
});
} else {
this.empty().append( value );
}
return this;
},
Named Arguments
Other languages (like Python) allow one to pass named arguments as a means of passing only some arguments and making the arguments independent of the order they are passed in. Javascript does not directly support the feature of named arguments. A design pattern that is commonly used in its place is to pass a map of properties/values. This can be done by passing an object with properties and values or in ES6 and above, you could actually pass a Map object itself.
Here's a simple ES5 example:
jQuery's $.ajax() accepts a form of usage where you just pass it a single parameter which is a regular Javascript object with properties and values. Which properties you pass it determine which arguments/options are being passed to the ajax call. Some may be required, many are optional. Since they are properties on an object, there is no specific order. In fact, there are more than 30 different properties that can be passed on that object, only one (the url) is required.
Here's an example:
$.ajax({url: "http://www.example.com/somepath", data: myArgs, dataType: "json"}).then(function(result) {
// process result here
});
Inside of the $.ajax() implementation, it can then just interrogate which properties were passed on the incoming object and use those as named arguments. This can be done either with for (prop in obj) or by getting all the properties into an array with Object.keys(obj) and then iterating that array.
This technique is used very commonly in Javascript when there are large numbers of arguments and/or many arguments are optional. Note: this puts an onus on the implementating function to make sure that a minimal valid set of arguments is present and to give the caller some debug feedback what is missing if insufficient arguments are passed (probably by throwing an exception with a helpful error message).
In an ES6 environment, it is possible to use destructuring to create default properties/values for the above passed object. This is discussed in more detail in this reference article.
Here's one example from that article:
function selectEntries({ start=0, end=-1, step=1 } = {}) {
···
};
Then, you can call this like any of these:
selectEntries({start: 5});
selectEntries({start: 5, end: 10});
selectEntries({start: 5, end: 10, step: 2});
selectEntries({step: 3});
selectEntries();
The arguments you do not list in the function call will pick up their default values from the function declaration.
This creates default properties and values for the start, end and step properties on an object passed to the selectEntries() function.
Default values for function arguments
In ES6, Javascript adds built-in language support for default values for arguments.
For example:
function multiply(a, b = 1) {
return a*b;
}
multiply(5); // 5
Further description of the ways this can be used here on MDN.

Overloading a function in JavaScript can be done in many ways. All of them involve a single master function that either performs all the processes, or delegates to sub-functions/processes.
One of the most common simple techniques involves a simple switch:
function foo(a, b) {
switch (arguments.length) {
case 0:
//do basic code
break;
case 1:
//do code with `a`
break;
case 2:
default:
//do code with `a` & `b`
break;
}
}
A more elegant technique would be to use an array (or object if you're not making overloads for every argument count):
fooArr = [
function () {
},
function (a) {
},
function (a,b) {
}
];
function foo(a, b) {
return fooArr[arguments.length](a, b);
}
That previous example isn't very elegant, anyone could modify fooArr, and it would fail if someone passes in more than 2 arguments to foo, so a better form would be to use a module pattern and a few checks:
var foo = (function () {
var fns;
fns = [
function () {
},
function (a) {
},
function (a, b) {
}
];
function foo(a, b) {
var fnIndex;
fnIndex = arguments.length;
if (fnIndex > foo.length) {
fnIndex = foo.length;
}
return fns[fnIndex].call(this, a, b);
}
return foo;
}());
Of course your overloads might want to use a dynamic number of parameters, so you could use an object for the fns collection.
var foo = (function () {
var fns;
fns = {};
fns[0] = function () {
};
fns[1] = function (a) {
};
fns[2] = function (a, b) {
};
fns.params = function (a, b /*, params */) {
};
function foo(a, b) {
var fnIndex;
fnIndex = arguments.length;
if (fnIndex > foo.length) {
fnIndex = 'params';
}
return fns[fnIndex].apply(this, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments));
}
return foo;
}());
My personal preference tends to be the switch, although it does bulk up the master function. A common example of where I'd use this technique would be a accessor/mutator method:
function Foo() {} //constructor
Foo.prototype = {
bar: function (val) {
switch (arguments.length) {
case 0:
return this._bar;
case 1:
this._bar = val;
return this;
}
}
}

You cannot do method overloading in strict sense. Not like the way it is supported in java or c#.
The issue is that JavaScript does NOT natively support method overloading. So, if it sees/parses two or more functions with a same names it’ll just consider the last defined function and overwrite the previous ones.
One of the way I think is suitable for most of the case is follows -
Lets say you have method
function foo(x)
{
}
Instead of overloading method which is not possible in javascript you can define a new method
fooNew(x,y,z)
{
}
and then modify the 1st function as follows -
function foo(x)
{
if(arguments.length==2)
{
return fooNew(arguments[0], arguments[1]);
}
}
If you have many such overloaded method consider using switch than just if-else statements.
(more details)
PS: Above link goes to my personal blog that has additional details on this.

I am using a bit different overloading approach based on arguments number.
However i believe John Fawcett's approach is also good.
Here the example, code based on John Resig's (jQuery's Author) explanations.
// o = existing object, n = function name, f = function.
function overload(o, n, f){
var old = o[n];
o[n] = function(){
if(f.length == arguments.length){
return f.apply(this, arguments);
}
else if(typeof o == 'function'){
return old.apply(this, arguments);
}
};
}
usability:
var obj = {};
overload(obj, 'function_name', function(){ /* what we will do if no args passed? */});
overload(obj, 'function_name', function(first){ /* what we will do if 1 arg passed? */});
overload(obj, 'function_name', function(first, second){ /* what we will do if 2 args passed? */});
overload(obj, 'function_name', function(first,second,third){ /* what we will do if 3 args passed? */});
//... etc :)

I tried to develop an elegant solution to this problem described here. And you can find the demo here. The usage looks like this:
var out = def({
'int': function(a) {
alert('Here is int '+a);
},
'float': function(a) {
alert('Here is float '+a);
},
'string': function(a) {
alert('Here is string '+a);
},
'int,string': function(a, b) {
alert('Here is an int '+a+' and a string '+b);
},
'default': function(obj) {
alert('Here is some other value '+ obj);
}
});
out('ten');
out(1);
out(2, 'robot');
out(2.5);
out(true);
The methods used to achieve this:
var def = function(functions, parent) {
return function() {
var types = [];
var args = [];
eachArg(arguments, function(i, elem) {
args.push(elem);
types.push(whatis(elem));
});
if(functions.hasOwnProperty(types.join())) {
return functions[types.join()].apply(parent, args);
} else {
if (typeof functions === 'function')
return functions.apply(parent, args);
if (functions.hasOwnProperty('default'))
return functions['default'].apply(parent, args);
}
};
};
var eachArg = function(args, fn) {
var i = 0;
while (args.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
if(fn !== undefined)
fn(i, args[i]);
i++;
}
return i-1;
};
var whatis = function(val) {
if(val === undefined)
return 'undefined';
if(val === null)
return 'null';
var type = typeof val;
if(type === 'object') {
if(val.hasOwnProperty('length') && val.hasOwnProperty('push'))
return 'array';
if(val.hasOwnProperty('getDate') && val.hasOwnProperty('toLocaleTimeString'))
return 'date';
if(val.hasOwnProperty('toExponential'))
type = 'number';
if(val.hasOwnProperty('substring') && val.hasOwnProperty('length'))
return 'string';
}
if(type === 'number') {
if(val.toString().indexOf('.') > 0)
return 'float';
else
return 'int';
}
return type;
};

In javascript you can implement the function just once and invoke the function without the parameters myFunc() You then check to see if options is 'undefined'
function myFunc(options){
if(typeof options != 'undefined'){
//code
}
}

https://github.com/jrf0110/leFunc
var getItems = leFunc({
"string": function(id){
// Do something
},
"string,object": function(id, options){
// Do something else
},
"string,object,function": function(id, options, callback){
// Do something different
callback();
},
"object,string,function": function(options, message, callback){
// Do something ca-raaaaazzzy
callback();
}
});
getItems("123abc"); // Calls the first function - "string"
getItems("123abc", {poop: true}); // Calls the second function - "string,object"
getItems("123abc", {butt: true}, function(){}); // Calls the third function - "string,object,function"
getItems({butt: true}, "What what?" function(){}); // Calls the fourth function - "object,string,function"

No Problem with Overloading in JS , The pb how to maintain a clean code when overloading function ?
You can use a forward to have clean code, based on two things:
Number of arguments (when calling the function).
Type of arguments (when calling the function)
function myFunc(){
return window['myFunc_'+arguments.length+Array.from(arguments).map((arg)=>typeof arg).join('_')](...arguments);
}
/** one argument & this argument is string */
function myFunc_1_string(){
}
//------------
/** one argument & this argument is object */
function myFunc_1_object(){
}
//----------
/** two arguments & those arguments are both string */
function myFunc_2_string_string(){
}
//--------
/** Three arguments & those arguments are : id(number),name(string), callback(function) */
function myFunc_3_number_string_function(){
let args=arguments;
new Person(args[0],args[1]).onReady(args[3]);
}
//--- And so on ....

How about using a proxy (ES6 Feature)?
I didn't find anywhere mentioning this method of doing it. It might be impractical but it's an interesting way nonetheless.
It's similar to Lua's metatables, where you can "overload" the call operator with the __call metamethod in order to achieve overloading.
In JS, it can be done with the apply method in a Proxy handler. You can check the arguments' existence, types, etc. inside the said method, without having to do it in the actual function.
MDN: proxy apply method
function overloads() {}
overloads.overload1 = (a, b) => {
return a + b;
}
overloads.overload2 = (a, b, c) => {
return a + b + c;
}
const overloadedFn = new Proxy(overloads, { // the first arg needs to be an Call-able object
apply(target, thisArg, args) {
if (args[2]) {
return target.overload2(...args);
}
return target.overload1(...args);
}
})
console.log(overloadedFn(1, 2, 3)); // 6
console.log(overloadedFn(1, 2)); // 3

Check this out:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/688869/Overloading-JavaScript-Functions
Basically in your class, you number your functions that you want to be overloaded and then with one function call you add function overloading, fast and easy.

Since JavaScript doesn't have function overload options object can be used instead. If there are one or two required arguments, it's better to keep them separate from the options object. Here is an example on how to use options object and populated values to default value in case if value was not passed in options object.
function optionsObjectTest(x, y, opts) {
opts = opts || {}; // default to an empty options object
var stringValue = opts.stringValue || "string default value";
var boolValue = !!opts.boolValue; // coerces value to boolean with a double negation pattern
var numericValue = opts.numericValue === undefined ? 123 : opts.numericValue;
return "{x:" + x + ", y:" + y + ", stringValue:'" + stringValue + "', boolValue:" + boolValue + ", numericValue:" + numericValue + "}";
}
here is an example on how to use options object

For this you need to create a function that adds the function to an object, then it will execute depending on the amount of arguments you send to the function:
<script >
//Main function to add the methods
function addMethod(object, name, fn) {
var old = object[name];
object[name] = function(){
if (fn.length == arguments.length)
return fn.apply(this, arguments)
else if (typeof old == 'function')
return old.apply(this, arguments);
};
}
 var ninjas = {
values: ["Dean Edwards", "Sam Stephenson", "Alex Russell"]
};
//Here we declare the first function with no arguments passed
addMethod(ninjas, "find", function(){
return this.values;
});
//Second function with one argument
addMethod(ninjas, "find", function(name){
var ret = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.values.length; i++)
if (this.values[i].indexOf(name) == 0)
ret.push(this.values[i]);
return ret;
});
//Third function with two arguments
addMethod(ninjas, "find", function(first, last){
var ret = [];
for (var i = 0; i < this.values.length; i++)
if (this.values[i] == (first + " " + last))
ret.push(this.values[i]);
return ret;
});
//Now you can do:
ninjas.find();
ninjas.find("Sam");
ninjas.find("Dean", "Edwards")
</script>

How about using spread operator as a parameter? The same block can be called with Multiple parameters. All the parameters are added into an array and inside the method you can loop in based on the length.
function mName(...opt){
console.log(opt);
}
mName(1,2,3,4); //[1,2,3,4]
mName(1,2,3); //[1,2,3]

I like to add sub functions within a parent function to achieve the ability to differentiate between argument groups for the same functionality.
var doSomething = function() {
var foo;
var bar;
};
doSomething.withArgSet1 = function(arg0, arg1) {
var obj = new doSomething();
// do something the first way
return obj;
};
doSomething.withArgSet2 = function(arg2, arg3) {
var obj = new doSomething();
// do something the second way
return obj;
};

What you are trying to achieve is best done using the function's local arguments variable.
function foo() {
if (arguments.length === 0) {
//do something
}
if (arguments.length === 1) {
//do something else
}
}
foo(); //do something
foo('one'); //do something else
You can find a better explanation of how this works here.

(() => {
//array that store functions
var Funcs = []
/**
* #param {function} f overload function
* #param {string} fname overload function name
* #param {parameters} vtypes function parameters type descriptor (number,string,object....etc
*/
overloadFunction = function(f, fname, ...vtypes) {
var k,l, n = false;
if (!Funcs.hasOwnProperty(fname)) Funcs[fname] = [];
Funcs[fname].push([f, vtypes?vtypes: 0 ]);
window[fname] = function() {
for (k = 0; k < Funcs[fname].length; k++)
if (arguments.length == Funcs[fname][k][0].length) {
n=true;
if (Funcs[fname][k][1]!=0)
for(i=0;i<arguments.length;i++)
{
if(typeof arguments[i]!=Funcs[fname][k][1][i])
{
n=false;
}
}
if(n) return Funcs[fname][k][0].apply(this, arguments);
}
}
}
})();
//First sum function definition with parameter type descriptors
overloadFunction(function(a,b){return a+b},"sum","number","number")
//Second sum function definition with parameter with parameter type descriptors
overloadFunction(function(a,b){return a+" "+b},"sum","string","string")
//Third sum function definition (not need parameter type descriptors,because no other functions with the same number of parameters
overloadFunction(function(a,b,c){return a+b+c},"sum")
//call first function
console.log(sum(4,2));//return 6
//call second function
console.log(sum("4","2"));//return "4 2"
//call third function
console.log(sum(3,2,5));//return 10
//ETC...

How do I wrap a function in Javascript?

I'm writing a global error handling "module" for one of my applications.
One of the features I want to have is to be able to easily wrap a function with a try{} catch{} block, so that all calls to that function will automatically have the error handling code that'll call my global logging method. (To avoid polluting the code everywhere with try/catch blocks).
This is, however, slightly beyond my understanding of the low-level functioning of JavaScript, the .call and .apply methods, and the this keyword.
I wrote this code, based on Prototype's Function.wrap method:
Object.extend(Function.prototype, {
TryCatchWrap: function() {
var __method = this;
return function() {
try { __method.apply(this, arguments) } catch(ex) { ErrorHandler.Exception(ex); }
}
}
});
Which is used like this:
function DoSomething(a, b, c, d) {
document.write(a + b + c)
alert(1/e);
}
var fn2 = DoSomething.TryCatchWrap();
fn2(1, 2, 3, 4);
That code works perfectly. It prints out 6, and then calls my global error handler.
My question is: will this break something when the function I'm wrapping is within an object, and it uses the "this" operator? I'm slightly worried since I'm calling .apply, passing something there, I'm afraid this may break something.

Personally instead of polluting builtin objects I would go with a decorator technique:
var makeSafe = function(fn){
return function(){
try{
return fn.apply(this, arguments);
}catch(ex){
ErrorHandler.Exception(ex);
}
};
};
You can use it like that:
function fnOriginal(a){
console.log(1/a);
};
var fn2 = makeSafe(fnOriginal);
fn2(1);
fn2(0);
fn2("abracadabra!");
var obj = {
method1: function(x){ /* do something */ },
method2: function(x){ /* do something */ }
};
obj.safeMethod1 = makeSafe(obj.method1);
obj.method1(42); // the original method
obj.safeMethod1(42); // the "safe" method
// let's override a method completely
obj.method2 = makeSafe(obj.method2);
But if you do feel like modifying prototypes, you can write it like that:
Function.prototype.TryCatchWrap = function(){
var fn = this; // because we call it on the function itself
// let's copy the rest from makeSafe()
return function(){
try{
return fn.apply(this, arguments);
}catch(ex){
ErrorHandler.Exception(ex);
}
};
};
Obvious improvement will be to parameterize makeSafe() so you can specify what function to call in the catch block.

2017 answer: just use ES6. Given the following demo function:
function doThing(){
console.log(...arguments)
}
You can make your own wrapper function without needing external libraries:
function wrap(someFunction){
function wrappedFunction(){
var newArguments = [...arguments]
newArguments.push('SECRET EXTRA ARG ADDED BY WRAPPER!')
console.log(`You're about to run a function with these arguments: \n ${newArguments}`)
return someFunction(...newArguments)
}
return wrappedFunction
}
In use:
doThing('one', 'two', 'three')
Works as normal.
But using the new wrapped function:
const wrappedDoThing = wrap(doThing)
wrappedDoThing('one', 'two', 'three')
Returns:
one two three SECRET EXTRA ARG ADDED BY WRAPPER!
2016 answer: use the wrap module:
In the example below I'm wrapping process.exit(), but this works happily with any other function (including browser JS too).
var wrap = require('lodash.wrap');
var log = console.log.bind(console)
var RESTART_FLUSH_DELAY = 3 * 1000
process.exit = wrap(process.exit, function(originalFunction) {
log('Waiting', RESTART_FLUSH_DELAY, 'for buffers to flush before restarting')
setTimeout(originalFunction, RESTART_FLUSH_DELAY)
});
process.exit(1);

Object.extend(Function.prototype, {
Object.extend in the Google Chrome Console gives me 'undefined'
Well here's some working example:
Boolean.prototype.XOR =
// ^- Note that it's a captial 'B' and so
// you'll work on the Class and not the >b<oolean object
function( bool2 ) {
var bool1 = this.valueOf();
// 'this' refers to the actual object - and not to 'XOR'
return (bool1 == true && bool2 == false)
|| (bool1 == false && bool2 == true);
}
alert ( "true.XOR( false ) => " true.XOR( false ) );
so instead of
Object.extend(Function.prototype, {...})
Do it like:
Function.prototype.extend = {}

Function wrapping in good old fashion:
//Our function
function myFunction() {
//For example we do this:
document.getElementById('demo').innerHTML = Date();
return;
}
//Our wrapper - middleware
function wrapper(fn) {
try {
return function(){
console.info('We add something else', Date());
return fn();
}
}
catch (error) {
console.info('The error: ', error);
}
}
//We use wrapper - middleware
myFunction = wrapper(myFunction);
The same in ES6 style:
//Our function
let myFunction = () => {
//For example we do this:
document.getElementById('demo').innerHTML = Date();
return;
}
//Our wrapper - middleware
const wrapper = func => {
try {
return () => {
console.info('We add something else', Date());
return func();
}
}
catch (error) {
console.info('The error: ', error);
}
}
//We use wrapper - middleware
myFunction = wrapper(myFunction);

Here is an ES6 style:
const fnOriginal = (a, b, c, d) => {
console.log(a);
console.log(b);
console.log(c);
console.log(d);
return 'Return value from fnOriginal';
};
const wrapperFunction = fn => {
return function () {
try {
const returnValuFromOriginal = fn.apply(this, arguments);
console.log('Adding a new line from Wrapper :', returnValuFromOriginal);
} catch (ex) {
ErrorHandler.Exception(ex);
}
};
};
const fnWrapped = wrapperFunction(fnOriginal);
fnWrapped(1, 2, 3, 4);

The following wrapping utility takes a function and enables the developer to inject a code or wrap the original:
function wrap(originalFunction, { inject, wrapper } = {}) {
const wrapperFn = function(...args) {
if (typeof inject === 'function') {
inject(originalFunction, this);
}
if (typeof wrapper === 'function') {
return wrapper(originalFunction, this, args);
}
return originalFunction.apply(this, args);
};
// copy the original function's props onto the wrapper
for(const prop in originalFunction) {
if (originalFunction.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
wrapperFn[prop] = originalFunction[prop];
}
}
return wrapperFn;
}
Usage example:
// create window.a()
(function() {
const txt = 'correctly'; // outer scope variable
window.a = function a(someText) { // our target
if (someText === "isn't") {
throw('omg');
}
return ['a', someText, window.a.c, txt].join(' ');
};
window.a.c = 'called'; // a.c property example
})();
const originalFunc = window.a;
console.log(originalFunc('is')); // logs "a is called correctly"
window.a = wrap(originalFunc);
console.log(a('is')); // logs "a is called correctly"
window.a = wrap(originalFunc, { inject(func, thisArg) { console.log('injected function'); }});
console.log(a('is')); // logs "injected function\na is called correctly"
window.a = wrap(originalFunc, { wrapper(func, thisArg, args) { console.log(`doing something else instead of ${func.name}(${args.join(', ')})`); }});
console.log(a('is')); // logs "doing something else instead of a(is)"
window.a = wrap(originalFunc, {
wrapper(func, thisArg, args) {
try {
return func.apply(thisArg, args);
} catch(err) {
console.error('got an exception');
}
}
});
a("isn't"); // error message: "got an exception"
The last example demonstrates how to wrap your function with a try-catch clause

As far as polluting the namespaces, I'm actually going to pollute them some more...
Since everything that happens in JS is initiated by an event of some kind, I'm planning to call my magical wrapper function from within the Prototype Event.observe() method, so I don't need to call it everywhere.
I do see the downsides of all this, of course, but this particular project is heavily tied to Prototype anyway, and I do want to have this error handler code be as global as possible, so it's not a big deal.
Thanks for your answer!