I have a program that leverages Google Maps from embedded JavaScript in Delphi (XE6).
I send it with TWebBrowser's HTMLWindow2.execScript method. I have many external calls and call backs using COM.
The constant to house the JavaScript is over 400 lines and is becoming nearly unmanageable. Since the JS is one string, the returned error offers little help. Many times, I have searched for a typo of out of scope var for hours.
I do use another editor, JetBrains, for my raw JS and that helps, but now I have to spend most of my time in Delphi IDE, to do the External stuff.
I was wondering if there is a better way to manage the script in Delphi?
Related
I am working on an old enterprise solution with these properties:
The solution has a MVC web application
The solution has a WCF service layer
The solution has javascript in the database, in the form of functions in a database column
The web application retrieves said javascript through the service layer and plugs it into certain pages
My team cannot modify the web application, nor the service layer
My team must write javascript by inserting functions into said database columns
This architecture leads to:
A very inefficient development loop
Very poor source control
I'd like to propose a solution for them, how to upgrade this, but here's where I fall a bit short on experience. My suggestion would be:
Migrate the javascript from the database to javascript files
Make some sort of hook in the web application for other teams' javascript files
My questions are:
Has anyone had this kind of problem and how did they solve it?
Is there an effective way to do this kind of javascript migration into files? My idea would be to write a small console program to do the migration
How would they make a hook to import our javascript files? My idea is to make a script bundle with some naming convention, so we can add scripts without them needing to change their code. Are there problems with this approach?
Any kind of input would be invaluable.
Edit:
Additional explanation:
The mechanism maps the javascript function names to a certain DOM elements' event attributes and inlines the code right after the element
The functions are standalone functions, depending only on libraries already in the web application
The functions are grouped by a common form
So I suppose it would be better to group them into files bearing the form names.
If these are just simple, static function definitions being inlined into the web page, then I suppose it might be possible to serialize/aggregate them all into a giant file and run something like prettier on it to make it readable.
That wouldn't be ideal to gain traction in your proposed migration, though. If the code has any volume to it at all, it would be nice to give some structure and order to maintain it.
It's already kind of a huge assumption that this javascript is just pure functions without any complex dependencies on each other, but it's possible that these pieces of Javascript work in isolation already if they are being pulled out of a database. It's hard to know without knowing more context. It seems unlikely that your life will be that easy.
If you managed to extract this monolithic Javascript file, the easiest thing to do would be include it in a script tag for the entire site and be done with it. This could be a bad idea if the file is getting to the ~MB size and slows your initial page load time.
Then again, the point at which you have a bunch of functions in one file, you could probably do a lot there to optimize and reduce duplication of code.
This is still all conjecture because I don't know the mechanism by which your web application imports the javascript once it retrieves it from the database.
Hey so currently working on my first personal project so bear with the questions!
Currently trying to create a Javascript program that will parse info from google forms to produce slides displaying the info. So far from my research the best way I've found to facilitate this process is googles app script editor. However, I was wondering if I can run this code by requesting it from a different javascript (or maybe even java) program that I will write code on webstorm. If I cant do this what is the best way to utilize the google apps script editor?
Thanks!
Google Apps Script is just javascript with extra built-in APIs (like SpreadsheetApp, FormApp, etc.).
It also has a UrlFetchApp API.
So you can run code like this:
// The code below logs the HTML code of the Google home page.
var response = UrlFetchApp.fetch("http://www.google.com/");
Logger.log(response.getContentText());
As such, if you want to provide JavaScript from elsewhere, you could fetch it and then eval it on the Google Apps Script side. (but we all know how tricky eval can get)
One other option is to have your own server side written using Google App Engine (or any other framework) and use Google's OAuth and authorize your app to fetch data from the Forms form
Slides and Google Apps Script
You might like to take a look at the addon "Slides Merge" by Bruce McPherson. I've never used it but it sounds like it might work for you. Here's what it's looks like in the addon store:
Getting information from Google Forms is a snap with google apps script since your can link the form right up to a spreadsheet. The Google Apps Script documentation is really quite good these days. Here's the documentation link. Google Apps Script is loosely based on Javascript 1.6. If your already a programmer my guess is that you'll have few problems learning to use it. In my experience the most difficult thing was dealing with the arrays of arrays produced by the getValues() method of ranges in google apps script and I made a short video that might be of some help to you.
I also have a script that I wrote in Google Apps Script that produces a sheet show that is a slide show inside of a spreadsheet.
I've found that using the Script Editor is pretty easy. There's some documentation in the support section of the documentation. It can be a bit buggy at times but overall I think it's a pretty good tool.
I've been searching for some time, and, as I couldn't find an answer, I'm asking this one. My issue is quite simple:
I have a form linked to a sheet. Bound to this sheet, I have a script running, performing calculations based on the just inserted data, and taking actions. Although, I would like to perform a request on a given API. For so, I have a working script in python (something about 100 lines), and I'm not willing to rewrite it in JS (and I don't even know if that would be possible, considering some limitations on Google Apps Script JS), nor do I want to pay for Google App Engine.
Is there anyway to run an external file, like a DOS command line, from my script in Google Apps Script?
I've seen something similar here, but this doesn't fit my cases because the asker is willing to use GAE.
Thanks in advance!
No. You'll either have to run the python app in a 3rd party service and then call it from GAS using UrlFetch(); or call a GAS function from python using Google's execution API. I don't think there's any other way.
I am currently writing an Android app that, among other things, uses text information from websites which I do not own. In addition, some of the pages require authentification.
For some pages I have been able to log in and retrieve the html code using BasicNameValuePairs and an HTTPClient with its associated objects.
Unfortunately, these methods retrieve the webpage source without running any javascript functions that a browser (Android Webview even) would normally run. I need the text that some of these scripts are retrieving.
I've done my research, but everything I've found is guesswork & extremely confusing. I'm okay with ignoring pages that require login for now. Also, I am willing to post any code that may be useful for constructing a solution; It is an independent project.
Any concrete solutions for scraping the html result from javascript calls? An example would be absolutely top-notch.
Final Success:
Rhino. Used this jar file.
Other Things I Tried:
HttpClient provided by Android
Cannot run javascript
HtmlUnit
4 hours, no success. Also huge, added 12 mb to my apk.
SL4A
Finally compiled. Used THIS guide to set-up. Abandoned as overkill for a simple rhino jar.
Things That Might Work:
Selenium
Further results will be posted. Others results will be added if posted.
Note: many of the options listed above reference each other. I think rhino is included in both sl4a and htmlunit. Also, I think htmlunit contains selenium.
The aforementioned solutions are very slow and restrict you to 1 url (well, not really, but I dare you to scrape 10 urls with Rhino while your user is impatiently waiting for results).
An alternative is to use a cloud scraping solution. You get the benefit of not wasting phone bandwidth on downloading content you won't use.
Try this solution: Bobik Java SDK
It gives you the ability to scrape up to hundreds of sites in a matter of seconds
We are starting to create an application using JavaScript and HTML5 which will use rest API to access server resources taking the advantage of jQuery awesomeness and easiness which our dev team is already comfortable with. This application is going to be made multilingual. We had decided later that we will write our DOM using JavaScript which will allow us the flexibility to use our UI bits for integration with our other applications and will create our own widgets using jQuery UI widgets. Then by just adding a script tag referencing JavaScript file in a relevant page of our other application, we will have most of our integration for that particular feature done.
Because it takes lot of amount of coding for creating DOM using JavaScript, we started looking in search of tools which will help us easily convert HTML to JavaScript for creation of UI and hence Google Closure Templates came in.
At this time what I thought of was, using Google closure for writing the UI DOM bit as it can quickly give me JavaScript for my DOM and then for other JavaScript (i.e. for server side communication and for other UI logic like changing of UI once got response from the server and x should change to y on click of z kind of things) which needs to be handwritten, I should use jQuery which is easy to write.
But after looking at this question, I see that both are compared against each other and it left me wondering on few things.
If I go by what I've thought of doing then, will I be able to call the functions generated by Google Closure in my jQuery widgets to render the UI?
If I leave jQuery and just use Google Closure will it be enough for my requirements?
As I started reading Google Closure documentation, I found that it has a whole new world of it's own and learning curve is involved. How much it is? If it is not much, then our team of 5 devs will be ready to learn it.
On 2 and 3, it would be great if anyone who has already used it can provide some insight.
Note:- Just in case if it has any relevance, we are working on Microsoft .NET stack for server side.
Closure Library and Closure Templates do not depend on one another, so you can certainly use Closure Templates with jQuery without pulling in the Closure Library or the Closure Compiler. To use Templates with jQuery, you translate your Closure Template files (aka "Soy" files) using SoyToJsSrcCompiler.jar as described in the documentation. Then you will have one JavaScript file for each Soy file where each JavaScript file contains one function per template defined in the corresponding Soy file.
To use the generated JavaScript functions, you must also include soyutils.js, which is a set of utilities required by the generated functions. Therefore, your production system should include the following JavaScript files concatenated/minified in this order:
soyutils.js
JavaScript generated from Soy
jQuery library
Your application code, which presumably depends on both jQuery and your template functions.
Getting up to speed on Closure Templates is considerably easier than learning the Library or the Compiler, so I'm sure that your dev team can pick it up quickly. I believe the online documentation is thorough without being overwhelming, so the syntax and usage should not take long to learn.
Note that if you decide to use the Closure Library instead of jQuery at some point, you should include soyutils_usegoog.js instead of soyutils.js. Though if you decide to rewrite your application logic to depend on Closure Library instead of jQuery after you have a substantial amount of code, this small change will likely be the least of your concerns! That is, I'm sure you could ultimately write your entire application using Google Closure, but migrating from one JavaScript library to another for a large application will likely require so many code changes that you may be too intimidated to take on the migration.