import utilityRemove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import utilityAssign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import utilityRandom from 'lodash/number/random';
import utilityFind from 'lodash/collection/find';
import utilityWhere from 'lodash/collection/where';
let util;
util = {};
util.remove = utilityRemove;
util.assign = utilityAssign;
util.random = utilityRandom;
util.find = utilityFind;
util.where = utilityWhere;
Is there a better way to do the above using ES6 module system?
If these are the only symbols in your module, I would shorten the names and use the new object shorthand to do:
import remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import random from 'lodash/number/random';
import find from 'lodash/collection/find';
import where from 'lodash/collection/where';
let util = {
remove,
assign,
random,
find,
where
};
If that could cause conflicts, you might consider moving this section to its own module. Being able to replace the lodash methods while testing could potentially be useful.
Since each symbol comes from a different module, you can't combine the imports, unless lodash provides a combined import module for that purpose.
If you're simply exporting a symbol without using it, you can also consider this syntax:
export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
Which, to anyone importing and using your module, will appear as:
import {remove, assign} from 'your-module';
You can do this in a utils module:
//utils.js
export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
export random from 'lodash/number/random';
export find from 'lodash/collection/find';
export where from 'lodash/collection/where';
and use it like this:
import * as util from './utils';
...
util.random();
Related
I have referred all the questions in stackoverflow.
But none of the suggested why and when to use default export.
I just saw that default can be metioned "When there is only one export in a file"
Any other reason for using default export in es6 modules?
Some differences that might make you choose one over the other:
Named Exports
Can export multiple values
MUST use the exported name when importing
Default Exports
Export a single value
Can use any name when importing
This article does a nice job of explaining when it would be a good idea to use one over the other.
It's somewhat a matter of opinion, but there are some objective aspects to it:
You can have only one default export in a module, whereas you can have as many named exports as you like.
If you provide a default export, the programmer using it has to come up with a name for it. This can lead to inconsistency in a codebase, where Mary does
import example from "./example";
...but Joe does
import ex from "./example";
In contrast, with a named export, the programmer doesn't have to think about what to call it unless there's a conflict with another identifier in their module.¹ It's just
import { example } from "./example";
With a named export, the person importing it has to specify the name of what they're importing. They get a nice early error if they try to import something that doesn't exist.
If you consistently only use named exports, programmers importing from modules in the project don't have to think about whether what they want is the default or a named export.
¹ If there is a conflict (for instance, you want example from two different modules), you can use as to rename:
import { example as widgetExample } from "./widget/example";
import { example as gadgetExample } from "./gadget/example";
You should almost always favour named exports, default exports have many downsides
Problems with default exports:
Difficult to refactor or ensure consistency since they can be named anything in the codebase other than what its actually called
Difficult to analyze by automated tools or provide code intellisense and autocompletion
They break tree shaking as instead of importing the single function you want to use you're forcing webpack to import the entire file with whatever other dead code it has leading to bigger bundle sizes
You can't export more than a single export per file
You lose faster/direct access to imports
checkout these articles for a more detailed explanation:
https://blog.neufund.org/why-we-have-banned-default-exports-and-you-should-do-the-same-d51fdc2cf2ad
https://humanwhocodes.com/blog/2019/01/stop-using-default-exports-javascript-module/
https://rajeshnaroth.medium.com/avoid-es6-default-exports-a24142978a7a
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
You can also alias named imports, assign a new name to a named export as you import it, allowing you to resolve naming collisions, or give the export a more informative name.
import MyComponent as MainComponent from "./MyComponent";
You can also Import all the named exports onto an object:
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
From MDN:
Named exports are useful to export several values. During the import, one will be able to use the same name to refer to the corresponding value.
Concerning the default export, there is only a single default export per module. A default export can be a function, a class, an object or anything else. This value is to be considered as the “main” exported value since it will be the simplest to import.
There aren't any definitive rules, but there are some conventions that people use to make it easier to structure or share code.
When there is only one export in the entire file, there is no reason to make it named.
Also, when your module has one main purpose, it could make sense to make that your default export. In those cases you can extra named exports
In react for example, React is the default export, since that is often the only part that you need. You don't always Component, so that's a named export that you can import when needed.
import React, {Component} from 'react';
In the other cases where one module has multiple equal (or mostly equal) exports, it's better to use named exports
import { blue, red, green } from 'colors';
1st Method:-
export foo; //so that this can be used in other file
import {foo} from 'abc'; //importing data/fun from module
2nd Method:-
export default foo; //used in one file
import foo from 'blah'; //importing data/fun from module
3rd Method:-
export = foo;
import * as foo from 'blah';
The above methods roughly compile to the following syntax below:-
//all export methods
exports.foo = foo; //1st method
exports['default'] = foo; //2nd method
module.exports = foo; //3rd method
//all import methods
var foo = require('abc').foo; //1st method
var foo = require('abc')['default']; //2nd method
var foo = require('abc'); //3rd method
For more information, visit to Default keyword explaination
Note:- There can be only one export default in one file.
So whenever we are exporting only 1 function, then it's better to use default keyword while exporting
EASIEST DEFINITION TO CLEAR CONFUSIONS
Let us understand the export methods, first, so that we can analyze ourselves when to use what, or why do we do what we do.
Named exports: One or more exports per module. When there are more than one exports in a module, each named export must be restructured while importing. Since there could be either export in the same module and the compiler will not know which one is required unless we mention it.
//Named export , exporting:
export const xyz = () =>{
}
// while importing this
import {xyx} from 'path'
or
const {xyz} = require(path)
The braces are just restructuring the export object.
On the other hand , default exports are only one export per module , so they are pretty plain.
//exporting default
const xyz =() >{
};
export default xyz
//Importing
import xyz from 'path'
or
const xyz = require(path)
I hope this was pretty simple to understand, and by now you can understand why you import React modules within braces...
Named Export: (export)
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
Import all the named exports onto an object:
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
Default Export: (export default)
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
Note: The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
Here's a great answer that explains default and named imports in ES6
This question already has answers here:
When should I use curly braces for ES6 import?
(11 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I am learning Javascript imports and I am yet to understand when we use curly braces while importing items(functions, objects, variables) from another JS file.
import Search from './models/Search';
import * as searchView from './views/searchView';
import { elements, renderLoader } from './views/base'
//elements is an object, renderLoader is a function
The import statements are used to import the exported bindings from another module
The curly braces ({}) are used to import named bindings and the concept behind it is called destructuring assignment The concept of destructuring assignment is a process that makes it possible to unpack the values from arrays or objects into distinct variables in the imported module
The curly braces ({}) are used to import named bindings
I would like to explain different types of imports in ES6 with the help of an example
Suppose we have a module named Animals(Animals.js) let suppose the module exports a default binding Man and several other named bindings such as Cat, Dog etc
/*
Animals.js
*/
..
export Cat;
export Dog
export default Man
Import a single export from a module
In order to export a single export from another module (let's say Cat) we can write it like this
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import {Cat} from "./Animals"
Similarly for Dog
/*
YetAnothermodule.js
*/
import {Dog} from "./Animals"
Import multiple exports from module
You can also import multiple modules as follows
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import {Dog, Cat} from "./Animals"
Import an export with a more convenient alias
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import {Dog as Puppy} from './Animals.js';
Rename multiple exports during import
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import {Dog as Puppy, Cat as Kitty} from './Animals.js';
But in the case to import Man into another module since it is a default export you can write it like this
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import Man from './Animals.js';
You can also mix both the above variants for example
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import Man, {Dog as Puppy, Cat as Kitty} from '/Animals.js';
Import an entire module's contents
If you want to import everything you can use
/*
Anothermodule.js
*/
import * as Animals from './Animals.js';
Here, accessing the exports means using the module name ("Animals" in this case) as a namespace. For example, if you want to use Cat in this case you can use it like below
Animals.Cat
You can read more information about import here
you can read about destructuring here
import { elements, renderLoader } from './views/base'
is the way you need to import single, named exports from a module, in this case it is importing named exports elements and renderLoader from base.js.
The { elements, renderLoader } syntax is in many cases just syntactic sugar (called destructuring) added in recent versions of the ECMAScript standard.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Destructuring_assignment#Object_destructuring
In this case, though, it is necessary to get only the named exports you want.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import#Import_a_single_export_from_a_module
Please note that you can also pick new names for your variables like this:
import { elements as newNameForElements, renderLoader as newNameForRenderLoader } from './views/base'
which would then make the elements export available as newNameForElements etc.
import Search from './models/Search';
Imports the default exported element as Search.
import * as searchView from './views/searchView';
Imports everything into searchView that has been exported.
import { elements, renderLoader } from './views/base'
Imports a hand-picked number of named exported elements.
{} is used when you want to import part of an object. The * as searchView one will import all properties and methods in the searchView file.
Suppose './views/base' has 3 properties: elements, renderLoader, additionalParam (Assuming that all three have been exported as named exports in the file)
When doing
import { elements, renderLoader } from './views/base'
you import only those 2 specific properties
But when you do
import * as base from './views/base'
you import all three properties in the object named base
Take the following example:
File to be imported, say importedFile.js:
var defaultExport, otherExport1, otherExport2, otherExport3;
export default defaultExport = () => {
console.log("Default Export")
}
export otherExport1 = "Other non-default Export";
export otherExport2 = function() {
console.log("Some more non-default Export");
};
export otherExport3 = { msg: "again non-default Export" };
Now in your main JS file, if you would do the following:
import something from './importedFile.js;
Here the variable something would get the value of the variable/function that has been exported as default in the importedFile.js file, i.e. the variable defaultExport. Now, if you do something like the following:
import { otherExport1, otherExport2 } from './importedFile.js;
It would import specifically otherExport1 and otherExport2 variable and function and not the defaultExport and otherExport3.
You can also do something like the following to import all the variables by their names from importedFile.js:
import { defaultExport, otherExport1, otherExport2, otherExport3 } from './importedFile.js';
Conclusion:
curly braces are used to choose variables/functions/objects (using a technique called object destructuring in ES6) that need to be imported without importing all the other unnecessary exported variables/functions/objects.
If you don't specify curly braces, it would always import only the variable/function/object that has been exported as default and nothing else. It would import undefined if nothing has been exported as default export.
You can use curly braces to import implicitly and selectively from another module functions or objects and so on.
// import implicitly one function and one constant from example.js
import { a, b } from 'example'
example.js
// export a and b but kept c private to example.js
export const a => { ... }
export const b = "hello"
const c = "private, not visible to the outside"
More infos:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/import
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/web/javascript/reference/statements/export
If something is exported as default it is imported without curly braces.
If multiple variables are exported it is imported using curly braces.
For example,
in somefunction.js
export default module;
import module from './somefunction.js';
in someOtherFunction.js
export func1;
export func2;
import { func1, func2 } from './someOtherFunction.js'
You can export more than 1 content from a single module.
For example at your code:
import * as searchView from './views/searchView'; //1
import { elements, renderLoader } from './views/base' //2
At //1, you import Everything from './views/searchView';
At //2, there might be more content from './views/base', but you import only elements and renderLoader
For more information: import MDN
I have referred all the questions in stackoverflow.
But none of the suggested why and when to use default export.
I just saw that default can be metioned "When there is only one export in a file"
Any other reason for using default export in es6 modules?
Some differences that might make you choose one over the other:
Named Exports
Can export multiple values
MUST use the exported name when importing
Default Exports
Export a single value
Can use any name when importing
This article does a nice job of explaining when it would be a good idea to use one over the other.
It's somewhat a matter of opinion, but there are some objective aspects to it:
You can have only one default export in a module, whereas you can have as many named exports as you like.
If you provide a default export, the programmer using it has to come up with a name for it. This can lead to inconsistency in a codebase, where Mary does
import example from "./example";
...but Joe does
import ex from "./example";
In contrast, with a named export, the programmer doesn't have to think about what to call it unless there's a conflict with another identifier in their module.¹ It's just
import { example } from "./example";
With a named export, the person importing it has to specify the name of what they're importing. They get a nice early error if they try to import something that doesn't exist.
If you consistently only use named exports, programmers importing from modules in the project don't have to think about whether what they want is the default or a named export.
¹ If there is a conflict (for instance, you want example from two different modules), you can use as to rename:
import { example as widgetExample } from "./widget/example";
import { example as gadgetExample } from "./gadget/example";
You should almost always favour named exports, default exports have many downsides
Problems with default exports:
Difficult to refactor or ensure consistency since they can be named anything in the codebase other than what its actually called
Difficult to analyze by automated tools or provide code intellisense and autocompletion
They break tree shaking as instead of importing the single function you want to use you're forcing webpack to import the entire file with whatever other dead code it has leading to bigger bundle sizes
You can't export more than a single export per file
You lose faster/direct access to imports
checkout these articles for a more detailed explanation:
https://blog.neufund.org/why-we-have-banned-default-exports-and-you-should-do-the-same-d51fdc2cf2ad
https://humanwhocodes.com/blog/2019/01/stop-using-default-exports-javascript-module/
https://rajeshnaroth.medium.com/avoid-es6-default-exports-a24142978a7a
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
You can also alias named imports, assign a new name to a named export as you import it, allowing you to resolve naming collisions, or give the export a more informative name.
import MyComponent as MainComponent from "./MyComponent";
You can also Import all the named exports onto an object:
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
From MDN:
Named exports are useful to export several values. During the import, one will be able to use the same name to refer to the corresponding value.
Concerning the default export, there is only a single default export per module. A default export can be a function, a class, an object or anything else. This value is to be considered as the “main” exported value since it will be the simplest to import.
There aren't any definitive rules, but there are some conventions that people use to make it easier to structure or share code.
When there is only one export in the entire file, there is no reason to make it named.
Also, when your module has one main purpose, it could make sense to make that your default export. In those cases you can extra named exports
In react for example, React is the default export, since that is often the only part that you need. You don't always Component, so that's a named export that you can import when needed.
import React, {Component} from 'react';
In the other cases where one module has multiple equal (or mostly equal) exports, it's better to use named exports
import { blue, red, green } from 'colors';
1st Method:-
export foo; //so that this can be used in other file
import {foo} from 'abc'; //importing data/fun from module
2nd Method:-
export default foo; //used in one file
import foo from 'blah'; //importing data/fun from module
3rd Method:-
export = foo;
import * as foo from 'blah';
The above methods roughly compile to the following syntax below:-
//all export methods
exports.foo = foo; //1st method
exports['default'] = foo; //2nd method
module.exports = foo; //3rd method
//all import methods
var foo = require('abc').foo; //1st method
var foo = require('abc')['default']; //2nd method
var foo = require('abc'); //3rd method
For more information, visit to Default keyword explaination
Note:- There can be only one export default in one file.
So whenever we are exporting only 1 function, then it's better to use default keyword while exporting
EASIEST DEFINITION TO CLEAR CONFUSIONS
Let us understand the export methods, first, so that we can analyze ourselves when to use what, or why do we do what we do.
Named exports: One or more exports per module. When there are more than one exports in a module, each named export must be restructured while importing. Since there could be either export in the same module and the compiler will not know which one is required unless we mention it.
//Named export , exporting:
export const xyz = () =>{
}
// while importing this
import {xyx} from 'path'
or
const {xyz} = require(path)
The braces are just restructuring the export object.
On the other hand , default exports are only one export per module , so they are pretty plain.
//exporting default
const xyz =() >{
};
export default xyz
//Importing
import xyz from 'path'
or
const xyz = require(path)
I hope this was pretty simple to understand, and by now you can understand why you import React modules within braces...
Named Export: (export)
With named exports, one can have multiple named exports per file. Then import the specific exports they want surrounded in braces. The name of imported module has to be the same as the name of the exported module.
// imports
// ex. importing a single named export
import { MyComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. importing multiple named exports
import { MyComponent, MyComponent2 } from "./MyComponent";
// ex. giving a named import a different name by using "as":
import { MyComponent2 as MyNewComponent } from "./MyComponent";
// exports from ./MyComponent.js file
export const MyComponent = () => {}
export const MyComponent2 = () => {}
Import all the named exports onto an object:
// use MainComponents.MyComponent and MainComponents.MyComponent2 here
import * as MainComponents from "./MyComponent";
Default Export: (export default)
One can have only one default export per file. When we import we have to specify a name and import like:
// import
import MyDefaultComponent from "./MyDefaultExport";
// export
const MyComponent = () => {}
export default MyComponent;
Note: The naming of import is completely independent in default export and we can use any name we like.
Here's a great answer that explains default and named imports in ES6
I'm a newbie on server side javascript, I've used nodejs before for simple things, but only the default libraries (where I never ever need to use require or import keywords), but lately I'm learning ReactNative/ReactXP I've seen:
import RX = require('reactxp');
const popsicle = require('popsicle');
import LoginPage = require("./LoginPage");
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import { AppRegistry, Text } from 'react-native';
import AppState from './AppState';
And exports:
export default Resources; // Resources is an object
export = LoginPage; // LoginPage is a class
The question is, what's the difference between combination of const-require, import-require and import-from? also what is export= it seems not on the Mozilla's doc?
import RX = require('reactxp');
import LoginPage = require("./LoginPage");
export = LoginPage; // LoginPage is a class
These 3 are typescript modules import/export syntax.
const popsicle = require('popsicle');
This is the nodejs modules require.
The rest
import React, { Component } from 'react';
import { AppRegistry, Text } from 'react-native';
import AppState from './AppState';
export default Resources; // Resources is an object
are ES2015 modules (import export).
It's not that you can compare them: they are just import/export for different environments.
It's not basically differences : -
const is new in ES5. Before you had to create it explicitly or by using iffy.
import is new in ES6, which is just a replacement of require (which depended on common js module).
Export is also a feature of ES6, which lets you to use the module or object/var in other file.
So, It is just the new convention & nothing. And now by default in Javascript after ES6.
Also, {} lets you directly expose the modules/object properties, It's also new feature in ES6. E.g : -
Let's you have an object & in file obj.js:
export let objj1 = {
a : function () {},
b : function () {},
}
So Basically there are two ways to use that
1.
let obj = require('obj');
a = obj.a or b = obj.b;
OR
import {a, b} from 'obj'
So now you can direct acess the a & b properties.
import utilityRemove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import utilityAssign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import utilityRandom from 'lodash/number/random';
import utilityFind from 'lodash/collection/find';
import utilityWhere from 'lodash/collection/where';
let util;
util = {};
util.remove = utilityRemove;
util.assign = utilityAssign;
util.random = utilityRandom;
util.find = utilityFind;
util.where = utilityWhere;
Is there a better way to do the above using ES6 module system?
If these are the only symbols in your module, I would shorten the names and use the new object shorthand to do:
import remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
import assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
import random from 'lodash/number/random';
import find from 'lodash/collection/find';
import where from 'lodash/collection/where';
let util = {
remove,
assign,
random,
find,
where
};
If that could cause conflicts, you might consider moving this section to its own module. Being able to replace the lodash methods while testing could potentially be useful.
Since each symbol comes from a different module, you can't combine the imports, unless lodash provides a combined import module for that purpose.
If you're simply exporting a symbol without using it, you can also consider this syntax:
export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
Which, to anyone importing and using your module, will appear as:
import {remove, assign} from 'your-module';
You can do this in a utils module:
//utils.js
export remove from 'lodash/array/remove';
export assign from 'lodash/object/assign';
export random from 'lodash/number/random';
export find from 'lodash/collection/find';
export where from 'lodash/collection/where';
and use it like this:
import * as util from './utils';
...
util.random();