Develop Reference

AngularJS - dynamically load templateURL when passing object into attribute

In my controller HTML I am passing an object into a directive as such:
<div cr-count-summary countdata="vm.currentCountData"></div>
The vm.currentCountData is an object that is returned from a factory
My directive code is below:
function countSummary() {
var directive = {
scope: {
countData: '='
},
link: link,
templateUrl: function(element, attrs) {
if (attrs.countdata.type === 'Deposit') {
return 'app/count/countsummary/countDeposit.html';
} else {
return 'app/count/countsummary/countRegisterSafe.html';
}
}
}
}
I have verified that vm.currentCountData is a valid object with a .type property on it. However, it doesn't recognize it. I have tried simplifying things by just passing in countdata="Deposit" in the controller HTML. I've also changed attrs.countdata.type to just attrs.countdata and it does evaluate as the string.
When I have it set up as I have shown above the directive templateUrl function seems to evaluate prior to the controller
I've looked at this, but it seems to only be evaluating strings
What do I need to do in order to allow attrs recognize the object?

This is not possible in this way, because at the time of evaluating templateUrl function angular doesn't have any scope variable, scope gets created after the compile function of directive generates preLink & postLink.
I'd prefer you to use ng-include directive inside the directive template, and then on basis of condition do load the desired template in it.
Markup
<div cr-count-summary count-data="vm.currentCountData"></div>
Directive
function countSummary() {
var directive = {
scope: {
countData: '='
},
link: link,
template: "<div ng-include=\"countdata.type === 'Deposit' ? "+
"'app/count/countsummary/countDeposit.html' :" +
"'app/count/countsummary/countRegisterSafe.html'\">"+
"</div>"
}
}

Angular directive isolate scope to parent binding undefined

I'm using (the awesome) Restangular and i'm running into something that forces me to use scope.$parent (not awesome), and i don't want to use that. It seems even though my controller is the parent scope to my directive's scope, the = isolated scope binding is evaluated before my parent controller is executed.
With the following HTML:
<div ng-controller="myController">
<div x-my-directive x-some-value="parentValue"></div>
</div>
And the following directive:
myApp.directive("myDirective", function () {
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function (scope, elem) {
console.log(scope.someValue); // Logs 'undefined' :(
},
scope: {
someValue: "="
}
}
});
And the following controller:
myApp.controller("myController", function($scope, allMyValues) {
allMyValues.getList().then(function(parentValue){
$scope.parentValue = parentValue;
});
}
As shown in my directives link function, evaluating a scope property that should have been bound to my parent's scope property returns undefined. However when i change my directives link function to the following:
myApp.directive("myDirective", function () {
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function (scope, elem) {
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(scope.someValue); // Logs '{1: number_1, 2: number_2}'
}, 2000);
},
scope: {
someValue: "="
}
}
});
How do i go about resolving this??
Thanks

that should helps:
myApp.controller("myController", function($scope, allMyValues) {
//add this line
$scope.parentValue={};
allMyValues.getList().then(function(parentValue){
$scope.parentValue = parentValue;
});
}
$scope.parentValue not exist until your request is resolved so add line like below to your code
sample demo http://jsbin.com/komikitado/1/edit

Looks like you are waiting for a promise to resolve before assigning the value to the scope.
There are a few ways you might handle this.
One way is to try moving the Restangular call to a resolve function for the view which holds the controller. Then you get access to the resolved data directly as an injection in your controllers
Another way might be to just assign the promise directly to the scope and then in the linking function wait for a resolution.
scope.someValue.then(function(value) { console.log(value); });

Angular JS: How do I set a property on directive local scope that i can use in the template?

I want to access a variable in this case map in the directive without having to predefine it like setting it as an attr of the directrive map="someValue". And also i dont want to use scope.$apply because i actually only want the variable in the isolated scope of the directive. Is this even possible ?
What is the best practice here? Basically my directive needs to do both. Access the parent scope and have its own scope which with i can build the template with.
Thank you everybody.
Here my Js code:
.directive('myFilter', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
source: '=source',
key: '=key',
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.$on('dataLoaded', function(e) {
scope.map = {};
angular.forEach(scope.source, function(paramObj) {
if (!scope.map[paramObj[scope.key]]) {
var newEntry = {
value: paramObj[scope.key],
isChecked: false
}
scope.map[paramObj[scope.key]] = newEntry;
}
});
});
}
}
});
and my html:
<my-filter source="metaPara.filteredParameters" key="'value'">
<table class="table table-borered">
<tr data-ng-repeat="item in map">
<td>{{item.value}}</td>
</tr>
</table>
</my-filter>

You might want to refer to the Angular documentation for directives, again.
If you want an isolate-scope (a scope which has no access to ancestors), then use
scope : { /* ... */ }
otherwise, if you want a unique scope, which does have access to ancestors, use
scope : true
Then, you can put your HTML-modifying or event-listening (that doesn't rely on ng-click or something else Angular already covers) in
link : function (scope, el, attrs, controller) { }
...and you can put all of your regular implementation inside of
controller : ["$scope", function ($scope) {
var myController = this;
myController.property = "12";
}],
controllerAs : "myController"
So that in your template you can say:
<span>{{ myController.property }}</span>
You can also use a pre-registered controller, which you call by name:
controller : "mySimpleController",
controllerAs : "myController"
Also, rather than using $scope.$apply, I'd recommend using $timeout (has to be injected).
The difference is that $scope.$apply will only work at certain points -- if you're already inside of a digest cycle, it will throw an error, and not update anything.
$timeout( ) sets the updates to happen during the next update-cycle.
Ideally, you should know whether or not you need an $apply or not, and be able to guarantee that you're only using it in one spot, per update/digest, but $timeout will save you from those points where you aren't necessarily sure.

Callback function inside directive attr defined in different attr

So I have this directive called say, mySave, it's pretty much just this
app.directive('mySave', function($http) {
return function(scope, element, attrs) {
element.bind("click", function() {
$http.post('/save', scope.data).success(returnedData) {
// callback defined on my utils service here
// user defined callback here, from my-save-callback perhaps?
}
});
}
});
the element itself looks like this
<button my-save my-save-callback="callbackFunctionInController()">save</button>
callbackFunctionInController is for now just
$scope.callbackFunctionInController = function() {
alert("callback");
}
when I console.log() attrs.mySaveCallback inside my-save directive, it just gives me a string callbackFunctionInController(), I read somewhere that I should $parse this and it would be fine, so I tried to $parse(attrs.mySaveCallback) which gave me back some function, but hardly the one I was looking for, it gave me back
function (a,b){return m(a,b)}
What am I doing wrong? Is this approach flawed from the beginning?

So what seems like the best way is using the isolated scope as suggested by ProLoser
app.directive('mySave', function($http) {
return {
scope: {
callback: '&mySaveCallback'
}
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
element.on("click", function() {
$http.post('/save', scope.$parent.data).success(returnedData) {
// callback defined on my utils service here
scope.callback(); // fires alert
}
});
}
}
});
For passing parameters back to controller do this
[11:28] <revolunet> you have to send named parameters
[11:28] <revolunet> eg my-attr="callback(a, b)"
[11:29] <revolunet> in the directive: scope.callback({a:xxx, b:yyy})

There are a lot of ways to go about what you're doing. The FIRST thing you should know is that the $http.post() is going to be called as soon as that DOM element is rendered out by the template engine, and that's it. If you put it inside a repeat, the call will be done for each new item in the repeater, so my guess is this is definitely not what you want. And if it is then you really aren't designing things correctly because the existence of DOM alone should not dictate queries to the backend.
Anyway, directly answering your question; if you read the albeit crappy docs on $parse, it returns you an evaluation expression. When you execute this function by passing the scope to evaluate on, the current state of that expression on the scope you passed will be returned, this means your function will be executed.
var expression = $parse(attrs.mySave);
results = expression($scope); // call on demand when needed
expression.assign($scope, 'newValu'); // the major reason to leverage $parse, setting vals
Yes, it's a little confusing at first, but you must understand that a $scope changes constantly in asynchronous apps and it's all about WHEN you want the value determined, not just how. $parse is more useful for a reference to a model that you want to be able to assign a value to, not just read from.
Of course, you may want to read up on creating an isolate scope or on how to $eval() an expression.
$scope.$eval(attrs.mySave);

You can use .$eval to execute a statement in the given scope
app.directive('mySave', function($http) {
return function(scope, element, attrs) {
$http.post('/save', scope.data).success(returnedData) {
// callback defined on my utils service here
// user defined callback here, from my-save-callback perhaps?
scope.$eval(attrs.mySaveCallback)
}
}
});
TD: Demo
If you want to share data between a directive and a controller you can use the two way binding
app.controller('AppController', function ($scope) {
$scope.callbackFunctionInController = function() {
console.log('do something')
};
$scope.$watch('somedata', function(data) {
console.log('controller', data);
}, true);
});
app.directive('mySave', function($http, $parse) {
return {
scope: {
data: '=mySaveData',
callback: '&mySaveCallback' //the callback
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
$http.get('data.json').success(function(data) {
console.log('data', data);
scope.data = data;
scope.callback(); //calling callback, this may not be required
});
}
};
});
Demo: Fiddle

scope: {
callback: '&mySaveCallback'
}
Setting the scope explicitly could be a good solution but if you want the reach other parts of the original scope you can't because you have just overwritten it. For some reason, I needed to reach other parts of the scope too so I used the same implementation as ng-click do.
The use of my directive in HTML:
<div my-data-table my-source="dataSource" refresh="refresh(data)">
Inside the directive (without setting the scope explicitly):
var refreshHandler = $parse(attrs.refresh);
scope.$apply(function () {
refreshHandler( {data : conditions}, scope, { $event: event });
});
With this I can call the function in controller and pass parameters to it.
In the controller:
$scope.refresh= function(data){
console.log(data);
}
And it prints the conditions correctly out.

This worked for me
Inside the view script
<tag mycallbackattrib="scopemethod">
Inside the directive
$scope[attrs.mycallbackattrib](params....);
It is correctly called and params are passed, but maybe is not a best 'angular way' to work.

You should be using ng-click instead of creating your own directive.

app.directive('mySave', function($http, $parse) {
return {
scope: {
data: '=mySaveData',
callback: '&' //the callback
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
$http.get('data.json').success(function(data) {
console.log('data', data);
if (scope.callback()) scope.callback().apply(data);
});
}
};
});

How to get evaluated attributes inside a custom directive

I'm trying to get an evaluated attribute from my custom directive, but I can't find the right way of doing it.
I've created this jsFiddle to elaborate.
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
<input my-directive value="123">
<input my-directive value="{{1+1}}">
</div>
myApp.directive('myDirective', function () {
return function (scope, element, attr) {
element.val("value = "+attr.value);
}
});
What am I missing?

Notice: I do update this answer as I find better solutions. I also keep the old answers for future reference as long as they remain related. Latest and best answer comes first.
Better answer:
Directives in angularjs are very powerful, but it takes time to comprehend which processes lie behind them.
While creating directives, angularjs allows you to create an isolated scope with some bindings to the parent scope. These bindings are specified by the attribute you attach the element in DOM and how you define scope property in the directive definition object.
There are 3 types of binding options which you can define in scope and you write those as prefixes related attribute.
angular.module("myApp", []).directive("myDirective", function () {
return {
restrict: "A",
scope: {
text: "#myText",
twoWayBind: "=myTwoWayBind",
oneWayBind: "&myOneWayBind"
}
};
}).controller("myController", function ($scope) {
$scope.foo = {name: "Umur"};
$scope.bar = "qwe";
});
HTML
<div ng-controller="myController">
<div my-directive my-text="hello {{ bar }}" my-two-way-bind="foo" my-one-way-bind="bar">
</div>
</div>
In that case, in the scope of directive (whether it's in linking function or controller), we can access these properties like this:
/* Directive scope */
in: $scope.text
out: "hello qwe"
// this would automatically update the changes of value in digest
// this is always string as dom attributes values are always strings
in: $scope.twoWayBind
out: {name:"Umur"}
// this would automatically update the changes of value in digest
// changes in this will be reflected in parent scope
// in directive's scope
in: $scope.twoWayBind.name = "John"
//in parent scope
in: $scope.foo.name
out: "John"
in: $scope.oneWayBind() // notice the function call, this binding is read only
out: "qwe"
// any changes here will not reflect in parent, as this only a getter .
"Still OK" Answer:
Since this answer got accepted, but has some issues, I'm going to update it to a better one. Apparently, $parse is a service which does not lie in properties of the current scope, which means it only takes angular expressions and cannot reach scope.
{{,}} expressions are compiled while angularjs initiating which means when we try to access them in our directives postlink method, they are already compiled. ({{1+1}} is 2 in directive already).
This is how you would want to use:
var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]);
myApp.directive('myDirective', function ($parse) {
return function (scope, element, attr) {
element.val("value=" + $parse(attr.myDirective)(scope));
};
});
function MyCtrl($scope) {
$scope.aaa = 3432;
}​
.
<div ng-controller="MyCtrl">
<input my-directive="123">
<input my-directive="1+1">
<input my-directive="'1+1'">
<input my-directive="aaa">
</div>​​​​​​​​
One thing you should notice here is that, if you want set the value string, you should wrap it in quotes. (See 3rd input)
Here is the fiddle to play with: http://jsfiddle.net/neuTA/6/
Old Answer:
I'm not removing this for folks who can be misled like me, note that using $eval is perfectly fine the correct way to do it, but $parse has a different behavior, you probably won't need this to use in most of the cases.
The way to do it is, once again, using scope.$eval. Not only it compiles the angular expression, it has also access to the current scope's properties.
var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]);
myApp.directive('myDirective', function () {
return function (scope, element, attr) {
element.val("value = "+ scope.$eval(attr.value));
}
});
function MyCtrl($scope) {
}​
What you are missing was $eval.
http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.$rootScope.Scope#$eval
Executes the expression on the current scope returning the result. Any exceptions in the expression are propagated (uncaught). This is useful when evaluating angular expressions.

For an attribute value that needs to be interpolated in a directive that is not using an isolated scope, e.g.,
<input my-directive value="{{1+1}}">
use Attributes' method $observe:
myApp.directive('myDirective', function () {
return function (scope, element, attr) {
attr.$observe('value', function(actual_value) {
element.val("value = "+ actual_value);
})
}
});
From the directive page,
observing interpolated attributes: Use $observe to observe the value changes of attributes that contain interpolation (e.g. src="{{bar}}"). Not only is this very efficient but it's also the only way to easily get the actual value because during the linking phase the interpolation hasn't been evaluated yet and so the value is at this time set to undefined.
If the attribute value is just a constant, e.g.,
<input my-directive value="123">
you can use $eval if the value is a number or boolean, and you want the correct type:
return function (scope, element, attr) {
var number = scope.$eval(attr.value);
console.log(number, number + 1);
});
If the attribute value is a string constant, or you want the value to be string type in your directive, you can access it directly:
return function (scope, element, attr) {
var str = attr.value;
console.log(str, str + " more");
});
In your case, however, since you want to support interpolated values and constants, use $observe.

The other answers here are very much correct, and valuable. But sometimes you just want simple: to get a plain old parsed value at directive instantiation, without needing updates, and without messing with isolate scope. For instance, it can be handy to provide a declarative payload into your directive as an array or hash-object in the form:
my-directive-name="['string1', 'string2']"
In that case, you can cut to the chase and just use a nice basic angular.$eval(attr.attrName).
element.val("value = "+angular.$eval(attr.value));
Working Fiddle.

For the same solution I was looking for Angularjs directive with ng-Model.
Here is the code that resolve the problem.
myApp.directive('zipcodeformatter', function () {
return {
restrict: 'A', // only activate on element attribute
require: '?ngModel', // get a hold of NgModelController
link: function (scope, element, attrs, ngModel) {
scope.$watch(attrs.ngModel, function (v) {
if (v) {
console.log('value changed, new value is: ' + v + ' ' + v.length);
if (v.length > 5) {
var newzip = v.replace("-", '');
var str = newzip.substring(0, 5) + '-' + newzip.substring(5, newzip.length);
element.val(str);
} else {
element.val(v);
}
}
});
}
};
});
HTML DOM
<input maxlength="10" zipcodeformatter onkeypress="return isNumberKey(event)" placeholder="Zipcode" type="text" ng-readonly="!checked" name="zipcode" id="postal_code" class="form-control input-sm" ng-model="patient.shippingZipcode" required ng-required="true">
My Result is:
92108-2223

var myApp = angular.module('myApp',[]);
myApp .directive('myDirective', function ($timeout) {
return function (scope, element, attr) {
$timeout(function(){
element.val("value = "+attr.value);
});
}
});
function MyCtrl($scope) {
}
Use $timeout because directive call after dom load so your changes doesn`'t apply