I'm having trouble with an angular directive. It doesn't seem to run the link function.
I feel like it's something obvious, but I just can't figure it out.
The directive is required as seen from below
angular.module('test').requires // ["injectedModule"]
Code below. Fiddle.
Any help would be amazing.
angular
.module('test', ['injectedModule'])
.controller('tester', [
function() {
this.test = function(data) {
alert(data);
}
}
]);
angular
.module('injectedModule', [])
.directive('testing', [
function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: true,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
alert(scope, element, attrs);
}
};
}
]);
<div ng-app="test">
<div ng-controller="tester as t">
<video id="test" ng-src="https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xfa1/t50.2886-16/11726387_1613973172221601_1804343601_n.mp4" testing="t.test(el)" />
</div>
</div>
Looks to me like
restrict: 'E',
should be
restrict: 'A',
Your directive isn't being called at all as it is.
I think the error is in the restriction you are giving to your directive.
You are restricting your directive to match only element (in other words tag). You should restrict to match attribute 'A'. Here's angular official documentation https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/directive
and here's your fiddle working
Code sample:
angular
.module('injectedModule', [])
.directive('testing', [
function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: true,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
alert(scope, element, attrs);
}
};
}
]);
Related
I am trying to figure out how to pass a transclusion down through nested directives and bind to data in the inner-most directive. Think of it like a list type control where you bind it to a list of data and the transclusion is the template you want to use to display the data. Here's a basic example bound to just a single value (here's a plunk for it).
html
<body ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="AppCtrl as app">
<outer model="app.data"><div>{{ source.name }}</div></outer>
</body>
javascript
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('AppCtrl', [function() {
var ctrl = this;
ctrl.data = { name: "Han Solo" };
ctrl.welcomeMessage = 'Welcome to Angular';
}])
.directive('outer', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
scope: {
model: '='
},
template: '<div class="outer"><inner my-data="model"><div ng-transclude></div></div></div>'
};
})
.directive('inner', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
scope: {
source: '=myData'
},
template :'<div class="inner" my-transclude></div>'
};
})
.directive('myTransclude', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
transclude: 'element',
link: function(scope, element, attrs, controller, transclude) {
transclude(scope, function(clone) {
element.after(clone);
})
}
}
});
As you can see, the transcluded bit doesn't appear. Any thoughts?
In this case you don't have to use a custom transclude directive or any trick. The problem I found with your code is that transclude is being compiled to the parent scope by default. So, you can fix that by implementing the compile phase of your directive (this happens before the link phase). The implementation would look like the code below:
app.directive('inner', function () {
return {
restrict: 'E',
transclude: true,
scope: {
source: '=myData'
},
template: '<div class="inner" ng-transclude></div>',
compile: function (tElem, tAttrs, transclude) {
return function (scope, elem, attrs) { // link
transclude(scope, function (clone) {
elem.children('.inner').append(clone);
});
};
}
};
});
By doing this, you are forcing your directive to transclude for its isolated scope.
Thanks to Zach's answer, I found a different way to solve my issue. I've now put the template in a separate file and passed it's url down through the scopes and then inserting it with ng-include. Here's a Plunk of the solution.
html:
<body ng-app="myApp" ng-controller="AppCtrl as app">
<outer model="app.data" row-template-url="template.html"></outer>
</body>
template:
<div>{{ source.name }}</div>
javascript:
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('AppCtrl', [function() {
var ctrl = this;
ctrl.data = { name: "Han Solo" };
}])
.directive('outer', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
model: '=',
rowTemplateUrl: '#'
},
template: '<div class="outer"><inner my-data="model" row-template-url="{{ rowTemplateUrl }}"></inner></div>'
};
})
.directive('inner', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
source: '=myData',
rowTemplateUrl: '#'
},
template :'<div class="inner" ng-include="rowTemplateUrl"></div>'
};
});
You can pass your transclude all the way down to the third directive, but the problem I see is with the scope override. You want the {{ source.name }} to come from the inner directive, but by the time it compiles this in the first directive:
template: '<div class="outer"><inner my-data="model"><div ng-transclude></div></div></div>'
the {{ source.name }} has already been compiled using the outer's scope. The only way I can see this working the way you want is to manually do it with $compile... but maybe someone smarter than me can think of another way.
Demo Plunker
I'm trying to display the elements of an array using ng-repeat and a directive. The directive part is important to the solution. However the element of the array is not getting bound and displays an empty value.
The fiddle can be found at http://jsfiddle.net/qrdk9sp5/
HTML
<div ng-app="app" ng-controller="testCtrl">
{{chat.words}}
<test ng-repeat="word in chat.words"></test>
</div>
JS
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.controller("testCtrl", function($scope) {
$scope.chat = {
words: [
'Anencephalous', 'Borborygm', 'Collywobbles'
]
};
});
app.directive('test', function() {
return {
restrict: 'EA',
scope: {
word: '='
},
template: "<li>{{word}}</li>",
replace: true,
link: function(scope, elm, attrs) {}
}
});
OUTPUT
["Anencephalous","Borborygm","Collywobbles"]
•
•
•
Expected output
["Anencephalous","Borborygm","Collywobbles"]
•Anencephalous
•Borborygm
•Collywobbles
Appreciate your help
You didn't bind word.
You have used isolate scope. If you don't bind with it's scope property,it won't work.
scope: {
word: '='
},
Try like this
<test word="word" ng-repeat="word in chat.words"></test>
DEMO
var app = angular.module('dr', []);
app.controller("testCtrl", function($scope) {
$scope.chat= {words: [
'Anencephalous', 'Borborygm', 'Collywobbles'
]};
});
app.directive('test', function() {
return {
restrict: 'EA',
scope: {
word: '='
},
priority: 1001,
template: "<li>{{word}}</li>",
replace: true,
link: function(scope, elm, attrs) {
}
}
});
Your directive needs to run before ng-repeat by using a higher priority, so when ng-repeat clones the element it is able to pick your modifications.
The section "Reasons behind the compile/link separation" from the Directives user guide have an explanation on how ng-repeat works.
The current ng-repeat priority is 1000, so anything higher than this should do it.
I am trying to implement dynamically configurable fields. I will get validation rules ng-required, ng-hidden, ng-disabled etc attributes as json from the server and set them dynamically through a directive.
I have the following directive code. It displays select values doubled JsBin link is http://jsbin.com/jiququtibo/1/edit
var app = angular.module('myapp', []);
app.directive('inputConfig', function( $compile) {
return {
require: 'ngModel',
restrict: 'A',
scope: '=',
compile: function(tElem, tAttrs){
console.log("compile 2");
tElem.removeAttr('data-input-config');
tElem.removeAttr('input-config');
tElem.attr('ng-required',true);
return {
pre: function (scope, iElement, iAttrs){
console.log('pre');
},
post: function(scope, iElement, iAttrs){
console.log("post");
$compile(tElem)(scope);
}
}
}
};
});
How can I solve this issue? I should be able to add directive dynamically.
To solve your problem you need to remove the following line from your post function:
$compile(tElem)(scope);
It's not clear to me why you are compiling here so I'm not sure if there will be any unintended side effects from this.
I found a solution following code is working.You should first clone, remove directive, prepare dom and compile
app.directive('inputConfig', function( $compile) {
return {
require: '?ngModel',
restrict: 'A',
compile:function (t, tAttrs, transclude){
var tElement = t.clone() ;
tElement.removeAttr('input-config');
tElement.attr('ng-required',true);
t.attr('ng-required',true);
return function(scope){
// first prepare dom
t.replaceWith(tElement);
// than compile
$compile(tElement)(scope);
};
}
}
});
I want to get a value straight from an attribute directive:
<form cronos-dataset="People as p">
Form Content
</form>
In my JS I tried:
app.directive('cronosDataset',[function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
controller: 'CronosGenericDatasetController',
scope: {
"cronos-dataset" : '#'
}
};
}])
.controller("CronosGenericDatasetController",['$scope', function($scope) {
alert($scope["cronos-dataset"]);
}]);
I want to alert "People as p" string but I get undefined. Is that right path or should I go thorough a different approach?
You are supposed to have camelCase in the scope declaration
app.directive('cronosDataset',[function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
controller: 'CronosGenericDatasetController',
scope: {
cronosDataset : '#'
}
};
}])
Here is a demo to see different variations
http://plnkr.co/edit/G6BiGgs4pzNqLW2sSMt7?p=preview
Make a link function instead:
app.directive('cronosDataset',[function() {
return {
scope: {},
restrict: 'A',
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
alert(attrs.cronosDataset);
}
With HTML like this...
<div ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="inControl">
I like to drink {{drink}}<br>
<input my-dir ng-model="drink"></input>
</div>
</div>
and javascript like this...
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('inControl', function($scope) {
$scope.drink = 'water';
});
app.directive('myDir', function(){
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function($scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
// why is this logging undefined?
console.log(ctrl);
}
};
});
Why can I not access the controller from within my directive? Why is my call to ctrl giving me undefined?
EDIT: add demo...
Fiddle available here: http://jsfiddle.net/billymoon/VE9dX/
see multiple controller can be attached with one app and simillarly multiple directive can be attached with one app, so if you wants to use one controller in one directive than you can set the controller property of directive to the name of the controller you wants yo attach with like in your case
app.directive('myDir', function(){
return {
restrict: 'A',
controller: 'inControl'
link: function($scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
// why is this logging undefined?
console.log(ctrl);
}
};
});
Despite this working with require:ngModel, this still isn't the best approach as it ties the directive directly to the controller. If you want your directive to communicate with your controller, you could be setting and reading off the scope.
HTML:
<div ng-app="myApp">
<div ng-controller="inControl">
I like to drink {{drink}}<br />
<input my-dir="drink"></input>
</div>
</div>
JS:
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('inControl', function($scope) {
$scope.drink = 'asdfasdf';
});
app.directive('myDir', function(){
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
console.log(scope[attrs.myDir]);
}
};
});
Alternatively you can use my-dir="{{drink}}" and read it as attrs.myDir.
http://jsfiddle.net/8UL6N/1/
Adding require: 'ngModel', fixed it for me - not sure if there is another way to specify it...
app.directive('myDir', function(){
return {
restrict: 'A',
require: 'ngModel',
link: function($scope, element, attrs, ctrl) {
// why is this logging undefined?
console.log(ctrl);
}
};
});