I have Marionette/Backbone appliaction which is working fine. I wanted to add extra layer in our views:
Before:
TabLayoutView -> CompositeView
After:
TabLayoutView -> SectionLayoutView -> CompositeView
But this is not working and I can't see where is the problem.
Here is the code:
Model of tab:
TabModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults: {
headerModel: {label: '', left: '', right: ''}
}
})
Template of tab:
<div class="headerSection"></div>
View of tab:
var TabLayoutView = Marionette.LayoutView.extend({
template: _.template(TabTemplate),
tagName: 'div',
regions: {
headerRegion: {selector: '.headerSection'}
},
onShow: function() {
this.headerRegion.show(new SectionLayoutView({model: this.model.get('headerModel')}));
}
});
Model of section:
SectionModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults: {
label: '',
left: '',
right: ''
}
});
Template of section:
<div class="section">
<div class="leftSection"/>
<div class="rightSection"/>
</div>
View of section:
SectionLayoutView = Marionette.LayoutView.extend({
template: _.template(SectionTemplate),
tagName: 'div',
regions: {
leftRegion: {selector: '.section .leftSection'},
rightRegion: {selector: '.section .rightSection'}
},
onShow: function() {
this.leftRegion.show(new CompositeView(this.model.get('left')));
this.rightRegion.show(new CompositeView(this.model.get('right')));
}
});
Error I get is :
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'apply' of undefined
in the method
serializeModel: function(model) {
return model.toJSON.apply(model, _.rest(arguments));
}
which is triggered in this line:
this.headerRegion.show(new SectionLayoutView({model: this.model.get('headerModel')}));
Could you please give me any ideas of what is wrong? We have similar code in other places and it is working fine. It seems like there is a problem with parsing model to json, but I can't see why.
Because are you passing a plain Object to the view...
this.headerRegion.show(new SectionLayoutView({
model: this.model.get('headerModel') // NOT a Backbone.Model
});
Try this:
this.headerRegion.show(new SectionLayoutView({
model: new Backbone.Model(this.model.get('headerModel'))
});
Related
I wonder if someone can help to find what's wrong in this case. I get "Uncaught ReferenceError: text is not defined" in line 6 app.js:
((__t=( text ))==null?'':_.escape(__t))+
driver.js:
var Marionette = require('backbone.marionette');
var TodoView = require('./views/layout');
var initialData = {
items: [
{assignee: 'Scott', text: 'Write a book about Marionette'},
{assignee: 'Andrew', text: 'Do some coding'}
]
};
var App = new Marionette.Application({
onStart: function(options) {
var todo = new TodoView({
collection: new Backbone.Collection(options.initialData.items),
model: new ToDoModel()
});
todo.render();
todo.triggerMethod('show');
}
});
App.start({initialData: initialData});
views/layout.js
var Backbone = require('backbone');
var Marionette = require('backbone.marionette');
var ToDoModel = require('../models/todo');
var FormView = require('./form');
var ListView = require('./list');
var Layout = Marionette.View.extend({
el: '#app-hook',
template: require('../templates/layout.html'),
regions: {
form: '.form',
list: '.list'
},
collectionEvents: {
add: 'itemAdded'
},
onShow: function() {
var formView = new FormView({model: this.model});
var listView = new ListView({collection: this.collection});
this.showChildView('form', formView);
this.showChildView('list', listView);
},
onChildviewAddTodoItem: function(child) {
this.model.set({
assignee: child.ui.assignee.val(),
text: child.ui.text.val()
}, {validate: true});
var items = this.model.pick('assignee', 'text');
this.collection.add(items);
},
itemAdded: function() {
this.model.set({
assignee: '',
text: ''
});
}
});
module.exports = Layout;
todoitem.html
<%- item.text %> — <%- item.assignee %>
Any can me explain why text is not defined?
check your ToDoModel for a typo, the Backbone Model field should be "defaults" not "default", while parsing for a template Marionette view looks for "defaults" field:
https://marionettejs.com/docs/master/template.html#rendering-a-model
so the ToDoModel code should go like this:
...
var ToDo = Backbone.Model.extend({
defaults: {
assignee: '',
text: ''
},
...
You should take a look at the Marionnette's ItemView documentation which explain how to render a template with custom data.
var my_template_html = '<div><%= args.name %></div>'
var MyView = Marionette.ItemView.extend({
template : function(serialized_model) {
var name = serialized_model.name;
return _.template(my_template_html)({
name : name,
some_custom_attribute : some_custom_key
});
}
});
new MyView().render();
Note that using a template function allows passing custom arguments
into the .template function and allows for more control over how the
.template function is called.
With the code you provided at the moment, I can't help.
Marionette calls 'serializeModel' before passing the context to 'template'. So, if you have a backbone.model like
{
.
.
.
attributes: {
text: 'someText',
asignee: 'someAsignee'
}
.
.
}
your template will receive
{
text: 'someText',
assignee: 'someAsignee'
}
I have worked with handlebars but not underscore exactly. There {{this.text}} and {{this.assignee}} works like a charm in the template. So, try this.text or text in place of item.text, see if that works
MyView.js:
define(['app/models/MyModel'],
function (MyModel) {
return Mn.LayoutView.extend({
template: '#my-template',
className: 'my-classname',
regions: {
content: '.content-region',
panel: '.panel-region'
}
initialize: function () {
_.bindAll(this, 'childButtonClicked');
},
onShow: function () {
this.getRegion('content').show(new AnotherView());
},
childEvents: {
'some-child-click': 'childButtonClicked'
},
childButtonClicked: function (view) {
var newView = new MyView({
model: new MyModel({
title: view.model.get('title')
})
});
this.getRegion('panel').show(newView);
}
});
});
I'm trying to nest instances of MyView within itself. This worked correctly when I was building the prototype by dumping everything into one function, like so:
var MyView = Mn.LayoutView.extend({
...
childButtonClicked: function(view) {
var newView = new MyView({
...
Now that I'm trying to separate the Views into their own files and use require.js, I can't figure out the syntax for a self-referential view.
When I run this code as is, I get an error like 'MyView is undefined'.
If I add it to the require header like so:
define(['app/models/MyModel', 'app/views/MyView'],
function (MyModel, MyView) {
I get the error 'MyView is not a function'.
EDIT for solution:
The marked solution works fine, I ended up using the obvious-in-hindslght:
define(['app/models/MyModel'],
function (MyModel) {
var MyView = Mn.LayoutView.extend({
template: '#my-template',
className: 'my-classname',
regions: {
content: '.content-region',
panel: '.panel-region'
}
initialize: function () {
_.bindAll(this, 'childButtonClicked');
},
onShow: function () {
this.getRegion('content').show(new AnotherView());
},
childEvents: {
'some-child-click': 'childButtonClicked'
},
childButtonClicked: function (view) {
var newView = new MyView({
model: new MyModel({
title: view.model.get('title')
})
});
this.getRegion('panel').show(newView);
}
});
return MyView;
});
You can require() in your module: var MyView = require(app/views/MyView);.
So for want of a better place:
childButtonClicked: function (view) {
var MyView = require(app/views/MyView);
var newView = new MyView({
model: new MyModel({
title: view.model.get('title')
})
});
this.getRegion('panel').show(newView);
}
I have displayed a textbox using Ember.View.
In model i had specified all the details of the input.
App.Display = DS.Model.extend({
inputText: DS.attr('string'),
width: DS.attr('string'),
height: DS.attr('string'),
className: DS.attr('string')
})
App.Display.FIXTURES = [{
id: '1',
innnerText : 'helo',
width: '197px',
height: '25px',
className: 'DisplayClass'
}]
from the model how can i append the className , width,height and innerText to the display unit.
Here is my displayView
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="_display">
{{#view 'App.DisplayView'}}{{/view}}
</script>
App.DisplayView = Ember.View.extend({
tagName: 'input',
});
App.DisplayController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
actions: {
}
});
How to populate the model data (i.e. innerText,dimensions,className) through controller to the view.
Note:Im not using any this.resource('somename')
In IndexRoute i have set the controller
setupController: function (controller, model) {
controller.set('model', model);
this.controllerFor('Display').set('model', model.displayInput);
In IndexRoute
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return {
//findall of model name
displayInput : this.store.findAll('display')
}
}
Now to use model to set and get the value of input
Working demo on JS Bin. You're using views - deprecated feature now - instead of components, which make code look not very nice and it's not ideal tool to implement behaviour you want. Instead I converted your approach to use components. Also, in Fixtures you've defined innnerText instead of inputText.
So, let's start with component. Code:
App.DisplayComponentComponent = Ember.Component.extend({
tagName: 'input',
attributeBindings: ['style', 'value'],
style: Ember.computed('model', 'model.{width,height}', function() {
var ret = '',
width = this.get('model.width'),
height = this.get('model.height');
if (width) {
ret += 'width: ' + width + ';';
}
if (height) {
ret += 'height: ' + height + ';';
}
return ret;
})
});
Component template:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="display-component">
</script>
Then, correct fixtures:
App.Display.FIXTURES = [{
id: '1',
inputText : 'helo',
width: '197px',
height: '25px',
className: 'DisplayClass'
}];
There's also a problem with your model. I think it'll be easier to initialize model for display controller just in setupController model.
setupController: function (controller, model) {
controller.set('model', model);
this.store.findAll('display').then(function(displays) {
this.controllerFor('display').set('model', display.get('firstObject'));
});
}
Then, if you want to use it, do it like that(I'm using your example with _display template, but I don't have a clue how do you use this):
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="_display">
{{display-component model=model class=model.className value=model.inputText}}
</script>
I have to assume that _display template is for display controller, because you're question isn't clear at all.
I’m doing a very basic application with Ember and Ember Data.
For some reason I always have the same problem. My application renders and displays the data correctly, but if I remove and search, it doesn't update the view.
I’ve already asked this here—the link has more code examples—but with not much luck. Here is how I’m trying to do it:
App = Ember.Application.create({
LOG_TRANSITIONS: true, LOG_VIEW_LOOKUPS: true
});
App.ApplicationAdapter = DS.FixtureAdapter.extend();
App.Sample = DS.Model.extend({ name: DS.attr('string') });
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('sample');
}
});
App.IndexController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
actions: {
remove: function(sample) {
sample.destroyRecord();
}
}
});
App.Sample.FIXTURES = [
{ id: 1, name: 'Learn Ember.js'},
{ id: 2, name: 'Record 2' },
{ id: 3, name: 'Test Delete' }
];
App.ApplicationRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
actions: {
showModal: function(name, content) {
this.controllerFor(name).set('content', content);
this.render(name, {
into: 'application',
outlet: 'modal'
});
},
removeModal: function() {
this.disconnectOutlet({
outlet: 'modal',
parentView: 'application'
});
}
}
});
App.MyModalComponent = Ember.Component.extend({
actions: {
ok: function() {
this.$('.modal').modal('hide');
this.sendAction('ok');
}
},
show: function() {
this.$('.modal').modal().on('hidden.bs.modal', function() {
this.sendAction('close');
}.bind(this));
}.on('didInsertElement')
});
From your code I have tried to come up with a reasonable solution for your problem
Before I get into the solution I think the controller should be IndexController rather than sampleDeleteModalController because ember expects controller to have same name as the route.
App.SampleDeleteModalController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
actions: {
remove: function() {
// Two ways
this.get('model').destroyRecord();
this.transitionToRoute('index');
}
}
});
transitionToRoute from the same route will not refresh a view.This will work only when you want to redirect to another route.
Solution to refresh view
option 1 : you can capture the same action inside index route after removing the record you can do this.refesh() which refreshes the model.
option 2 : You have to explicitly update the binded model inside the controller.
actions: {
remove: function() {
// Two ways
var localCopy = this.get('model');
localCopy.destroyRecord();
this.set('model',localCopy);
}
}
option 3 : After you set your model your model and then do this.rerender().Which is almost equivalent to window.reload()
What is the apropriate aproach to setup a view in a Backbone.Marionete environment to have a list of subviews, without manually rendering them, and consume as least as possible memmory.
The view with child views is rendered based on a template, and is a part of a tab control tabs. The tamplete for the tab view has divs, which are used as a placholders for child controls ( two collection views and two helper controls )
Several aproaches I've made already:
1) Create view instances in render method and, attach them to a propper el hardcoding the selectors in render method.
2) Extend a marionete layout and declare a regions for each view.
var GoalsView = Marionette.Layout.extend({
template: '#goals-view-template',
regions: {
content: '#team-goals-content',
homeFilter: '#team-goals-home-filter',
awayFilter: '#team-goals-away-filter'
},
className: 'team-goals',
initialize: function () {
this.homeFilterView = new SwitchControlView({
left: { name: 'HOME', key: 'home' },
right: { name: 'ALL', key: 'all' },
});
this.awayFilterView = new SwitchControlView({
left: { name: 'AWAY', key: 'away' },
right: { name: 'ALL', key: 'all' },
});
this.сontentView = new GoalsCollecitonView({
collection: statsHandler.getGoalsPerTeam()
});
},
onShow: function () {
this.content.show(this.сontentView);
this.homeFilter.show(this.homeFilterView);
this.awayFilter.show(this.awayFilterView);
}
});
This is the cool way, but I am worried about the overhead for maintaing regions collection which will always display single view.
3) I extended marionette item view with the following logic:
var ControlsView = Marionette.ItemView.extend({
views: {},
onRender: function() {
this.bindUIElements();
for (var key in this.ui) {
var view = this.views[key];
if (view) {
var rendered = view.render().$el;
//if (rendered.is('div') && !rendered.attr('class') && !rendered.attr('id')) {
// rendered = rendered.children();
//}
this.ui[key].html(rendered);
}
}
}
});
Which allowed me to write following code
var AssistsView = ControlsView.extend({
template: '#assists-view-template',
className: 'team-assists',
ui: {
content: '#team-assists-content',
homeFilter: '#team-assists-home-filter',
awayFilter: '#team-assists-away-filter'
},
initialize: function () {
this.views = {};
this.views.homeFilter = new SwitchControlView({
left: { name: 'HOME', key: 'home' },
right: { name: 'ALL', key: 'all' },
});
this.views.awayFilter = new SwitchControlView({
left: { name: 'AWAY', key: 'away' },
right: { name: 'ALL', key: 'all' },
});
this.views.content = new AssistsCollecitonView({
collection: statsHandler.getAssistsPerTeam()
});
}
});
But it will leak memmory for sure, and I not feel like I will be able to write proper code to handle memmory leaks.
So in general, what I want, is to have a nice declarative way to create a view with other views as controls on it, with protection agains memmory leaks and least memmory consumption possible...
P.S. sorry for the wall of text
Why don't you simply use a layout and display your views within the layout's regions? You can see an example here: https://github.com/davidsulc/marionette-gentle-introduction/blob/master/assets/js/apps/contacts/list/list_controller.js#L43-L46