filter result using 2 JSON - javascript

This is my saved localstorage,
[{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}]
I want to filter below result, to get HP.
{
"industries": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "oil and gas",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "ABC",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "DEF",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "GHJ",
}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "IT",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Apple",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "HP",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Google",
}
]
}
]
}
I thought of using multiple $.each but it have to iterate few times and it's quite redundant.

I would prefer using Javascript for loop, that way you can skip iterating over every object once required element is found.
Without jQuery (using for)
var i, j, merchant = null;
for(i = 0; i < data['industries'].length; i++){
if(data['industries'][i]['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
for(j = 0; j < data['industries'][i]['merchant'].length; j++){
if(data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j]['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant = data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j];
break;
}
}
if(merchant !== null){ break; }
}
}
With jQuery (using $.each)
var merchant_found = null;
$.each(data['industries'], function(i, industry){
if(industry['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
$.each(industry['merchant'], function(i, merchant){
if(merchant['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant_found = merchant;
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
var arg = [{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}];
var data = {
"industries": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "oil and gas",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "ABC",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "DEF",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "GHJ",
}
]
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "IT",
"merchant": [
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Apple",
},
{
"id": 2,
"name": "HP",
},
{
"id": 3,
"name": "Google",
}
]
}
]
};
var i, j, merchant = null;
for(i = 0; i < data['industries'].length; i++){
if(data['industries'][i]['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
for(j = 0; j < data['industries'][i]['merchant'].length; j++){
if(data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j]['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant = data['industries'][i]['merchant'][j];
break;
}
}
if(merchant !== null){ break; }
}
}
console.log(merchant);
document.writeln("<b>Without jQuery:</b><br>");
document.writeln((merchant !== null) ? "Found " + merchant['name'] : "Not found");
var merchant_found = null;
$.each(data['industries'], function(i, industry){
if(industry['id'] == arg[0]['industry_Id']){
$.each(industry['merchant'], function(i, merchant){
if(merchant['id'] == arg[0]['merchant_id']){
merchant_found = merchant;
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
}
return (!merchant_found);
});
console.log(merchant_found);
document.writeln("<br><br><b>With jQuery:</b><br>");
document.writeln((merchant_found) ? "Found " + merchant_found['name'] : "Not found");
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

selectors.map(function(selector) {
return data.industries.filter(function(industry) {
return industry.id == selector.industry_Id;
})[0].merchant.filter(function(merchant) {
return merchant.id == selector.merchant_id;
})[0].name;
});
// => DEF
If you want "HP", you want industry 2, not industry 1.
.filter(...)[0] is not really optimal. You could use .find(...), but that is not yet universally supported. Or you could use plain old JavaScript and write for loops instead to make it fast. Or you could use objects with ID keys instead of arrays to make lookups faster.

When it comes into a position where collection of data is what you're processing, I suggest you to take a look at underscore.js. It's not optimal choice for the best performance but it does make you code more readable and makes more sense especially when compared with loop.
Say data is a variable which stores your JSON data.
Try this:
// Given this selector criteria
var select = [{"industry_Id":1,"merchant_id":2}];
function filterByCriteria(criteria, data){
var match = [];
_.each(criteria, function(crit){
function matchIndustry(rec){ return rec.id===crit.industry_Id }
function matchMerchant(rec){ return rec.id===crit.merchant_id }
// Filter by industry id
var industry = _.first(_.where(data.industry, matchIndustry));
// Filter by merchant id
var merchant = _.where(industry.merchant, matchMerchant);
_.each(merchant, function addToMatchResult(m){
match.push(m.name);
});
});
return match;
}
var filteredData = filterByCriteria(select, data);
From snippet above, any merchants which match the search criteria will be taken to the match list. Is it more readable to you?

Do you even need numerical id's? Gets super easy when you don't.
/*
{
"industry": {
"oil and gas":{
"merchant": {
"ABC": {
"name": "ABC oil"
},
"DEF": {
"name": "DEF gas"
},
"GHJ" :{
"name": "GHJ oil and gas"
}
}
},
"IT": {
"merchant": {
"Apple" : {
"name": "Apple computers"
},
"HP": {
"name": "Hewlett Packard"
},
"Google": {
"name": "Google. Maw haw haw"
}
}
}
}
}
*/
var data = '{"industry": {"oil and gas":{"merchant": {"ABC": {"name": "ABC oil"},"DEF": {"name": "DEF gas"},"GHJ" :{"name": "GHJ oil and gas"}}},"IT": {"merchant": {"Apple" : {"name": "Apple computers"},"HP": {"name": "Hewlett Packard"},"Google": {"name": "Google. Maw haw haw"}}}}}';
data = JSON.parse(data);
var merchant = data.industry['IT'].merchant['HP'];
alert(merchant.name);
//console.log(merchant.name);

Related

Common objects in two objects

This function returns diff between two objects , i need to modify it to return common objects. Any help is appreciated.
Array sample:
var array1 = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
}, {
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888
}, {
"Name": "Triple",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
var arrar2 = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
}, {
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888
}, {
"Name": "index",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
// expected result
var resultArray = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
}, {
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888
},
}];
Current code:
function objDiff(array1, array2) {
var resultArray = []
array2.forEach(function(destObj) {
var check = array1.some(function(origObj) {
if (origObj.name == destObj.name) return true
})
if (!check) {
destObj.desc = 'missing in source'
resultArray.push(destObj)
}
})
array1.forEach(function(origObj) {
var check = array2.some(function(destObj) {
if (origObj.name == destObj.name) return true
})
if (!check) {
origObj.desc = 'missing in destination'
resultArray.push(origObj)
}
})
return resultArray
}
If all you want is to look for things that are the same in both arrays, you only need to loop over one of them. Something along these lines should work:
function objSame(array1, array2) {
var resultArray = []
array2.forEach(function(destObj) {
var check = array1.some(function(origObj) {
if(origObj.name == destObj.name) return true
})
if(check) {
destObj.desc = 'Same in both'
resultArray.push(destObj)
}
})
return resultArray
}
To find array elements that have a common Name property value, you could use a Map to avoid O(n²) time complexity. That map would have the objects from the first array keyed by their name. Pass it as the this object to a filter on the second array:
function objCommon(array1, array2) {
return array2.filter(function (obj) {
return this.has(obj.Name);
}, new Map(array1.map(obj => [obj.Name, obj])));
}
var array1= [
{ "Name": "Single", "URL": "xxx", "ID": 123 },
{ "Name": "Double", "URL": "yyy", "ID": 888},
{ "Name": "Triple", "URL": "zzz", "ID": 567 }];
var array2= [
{ "Name": "Single", "URL": "xxx", "ID": 123 },
{ "Name": "Double", "URL": "yyy", "ID": 888 },
{ "Name": "index", "URL": "zzz", "ID": 567 }];
var result = objCommon(array1, array2);
console.log(result);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
That's not your code, but the following function will return all matches by exploring both arrays with two forEach() loops. Algorithm complexity is given by array1.length * array2.length. Don't use for large arrays! But it's the easiest way to think of it. Indeed the first think that comes to my mind is checking every element of array2 for every element of array1 and compare them.
var array1 = ['DETE', 'Ivany', 'James', 'Don', 'Crakcer']
var array2 = ['Jamies', 'Ivanyy', 'DETE', 'Don']
function objMatch(array1,array2) {
var matches = [];
array1.forEach(function(element1) {
array2.forEach(function(element2) {
if(element1 == element2) {
matches.push(element1);
}
});
});
return matches;
}
console.log(objMatch(array1, array2));
// will return ['DETE', 'Don']
Another way to do with only one loop is to use sort(), credit to jeremy
var array1 = ["cat", "sum","fun", "run", "gut"];
var array2 = ["bat", "cat","dog","sun", "hut", "gut"];
var arrayMatch = function(array1, array2) {
var matches = [];
array1.sort();
array2.sort();
for (var i = 0; i < array1.length; i += 1) {
if (array2.indexOf(array1[i]) > -1) {
matches.push(array1[i]);
}
}
return matches;
}
console.log(arrayMatch(array1,array2))
And yet another way to do it is by using Array.prototype.filter, credit to Paul S.
var array1 = ['DETE', 'Ivany', 'James', 'Don', 'Crakcer']
var array2 = ['Jamies', 'Ivanyy', 'DETE', 'Don']
function arrayMatch(array1, array2) {
var t;
if (array1.length > array2.length) t = array2, array2 = array1, array1 = t;
return array1.filter(function (e) {
return array2.indexOf(e) > -1;
});
}
console.log(arrayMatch(array1, array2));

Group and count values in an array

I have an array with objects, like the following.
b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
I want to count how many issues have status close, and how many have backlog. I'd like to save the count in a new array as follows.
a = [
{Name: 'Backlog', count: 1},
{Name: 'close', count: 2}
];
I have tried the following.
b.issues.forEach(function(i) {
var statusName = i.fields.status.name;
if (statusName in a.Name) {
a.count = +1;
} else {
a.push({
Name: statusName,
count: 1
});
}
});
That however doesn't seem to be working. How should I implement this?
This is a perfect opportunity to use Array#reduce. That function will take a function that is applied to all elements of the array in order and can be used to accumulate a value. We can use it to accumulate an object with the various counts in it.
To make things easy, we track the counts in an object as simply {name: count, otherName: otherCount}. For every element, we check if we already have an entry for name. If not, create one with count 0. Otherwise, increment the count. After the reduce, we can map the array of keys, stored as keys of the object, to be in the format described in the question. See below.
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var counts = b.issues.reduce((p, c) => {
var name = c.fields.status.name;
if (!p.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
p[name] = 0;
}
p[name]++;
return p;
}, {});
console.log(counts);
var countsExtended = Object.keys(counts).map(k => {
return {name: k, count: counts[k]}; });
console.log(countsExtended);
.as-console-wrapper {
max-height: 100% !important;
}
Notes.
Array#reduce does not modify the original array.
You can easily modify the function passed to reduce to for example not distinguish between Backlog and backlog by changing
var name = c.fields.status.name;
into
var name = c.fields.status.name.toLowerCase();
for example. More advanced functionality can also easily be implemented.
Using ES6 Arrow functions you can do it with minimum syntax
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var countOfBackLog = b.issues.filter(x => {
return x.fields.status.name === "Backlog"
}).length
var countOfClose = b.issues.filter(x => {
return x.fields.status.name === "close"
}).length
a =[{Name: 'Backlog', count : countOfBackLog}, {Name: 'close', count : countOfClose}]
More about arrow functions here
You can write like this. It is dynamic.
var a = {};
for(var key in b["issues"]){
if(!a.hasOwnProperty(b["issues"][key].fields.status.name)){
a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name] = 1;
}else{
a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name] = a[b["issues"][key].fields.status.name]+1;
}
}
var c = [];
for(var key1 in a){
c.push({
name : key1,
count : a[key1]
});
}
Something like this should do the trick. Simply iterate over your data, keep 2 counters with the number of each type of issue, and create the data format you want in the end. Try it live on jsfiddle.
var b = {
"issues": [{
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "200",
"name": "Backlog"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "202",
"name": "close"
}
}
}, {
"fields": {
"status": {
"id": "201",
"name": "close"
}
}
}]
};
var data = [];
for(var issue of b.issues){
var entryFound = false;
var tempObj = {
name: issue.fields.status.name,
count: 1
};
for(var item of data){
if(item.name === tempObj.name){
item.count++;
entryFound = true;
break;
}
}
if(!entryFound){
data.push(tempObj);
}
}
console.log(data);

Search deep nested

I am working on a solution where I need to search for an element in a deeply nested JSON by its id. I have been advised to use underscore.js which I am pretty new to.
After reading the documentation http://underscorejs.org/#find , I tried to implement the solution using find, filter and findWhere.
Here is what I tried using find :
var test = {
"menuInputRequestId": 1,
"catalog":[
{
"uid": 1,
"name": "Pizza",
"desc": "Italian cuisine",
"products": [
{
"uid": 3,
"name": "Devilled chicken",
"desc": "chicken pizza",
"prices":[
{
"uid": 7,
"name": "regular",
"price": "$10"
},
{
"uid": 8,
"name": "large",
"price": "$12"
}
]
}
]
},
{
"uid": 2,
"name": "Pasta",
"desc": "Italian cuisine pasta",
"products": [
{
"uid": 4,
"name": "Lasagne",
"desc": "chicken lasage",
"prices":[
{
"uid": 9,
"name": "small",
"price": "$10"
},
{
"uid": 10,
"name": "large",
"price": "$15"
}
]
},
{
"uid": 5,
"name": "Pasta",
"desc": "chicken pasta",
"prices":[
{
"uid": 11,
"name": "small",
"price": "$8"
},
{
"uid": 12,
"name": "large",
"price": "$12"
}
]
}
]
}
]
};
var x = _.find(test, function (item) {
return item.catalog && item.catalog.uid == 1;
});
And a Fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/8hmz0760/
The issue I faced is that these functions check the top level of the structure and not the nested properties thus returning undefined. I tried to use item.catalog && item.catalog.uid == 1; logic as suggested in a similar question Underscore.js - filtering in a nested Json but failed.
How can I find an item by value by searching the whole deeply nested structure?
EDIT:
The following code is the latest i tried. The issue in that is that it directly traverses to prices nested object and tries to find the value. But my requirement is to search for the value in all the layers of the JSON.
var x = _.filter(test, function(evt) {
return _.any(evt.items, function(itm){
return _.any(itm.outcomes, function(prc) {
return prc.uid === 1 ;
});
});
});
Here's a solution which creates an object where the keys are the uids:
var catalogues = test.catalog;
var products = _.flatten(_.pluck(catalogues, 'products'));
var prices = _.flatten(_.pluck(products, 'prices'));
var ids = _.reduce(catalogues.concat(products,prices), function(memo, value){
memo[value.uid] = value;
return memo;
}, {});
var itemWithUid2 = ids[2]
var itemWithUid12 = ids[12]
I dont use underscore.js but you can use this instead
function isArray(what) {
return Object.prototype.toString.call(what) === '[object Array]';
}
function find(json,key,value){
var result = [];
for (var property in json)
{
//console.log(property);
if (json.hasOwnProperty(property)) {
if( property == key && json[property] == value)
{
result.push(json);
}
if( isArray(json[property]))
{
for(var child in json[property])
{
//console.log(json[property][child]);
var res = find(json[property][child],key,value);
if(res.length >= 1 ){
result.push(res);}
}
}
}
}
return result;
}
console.log(find(test,"uid",4));

Compare two objects in jQuery and get the difference [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
How to get the difference between two arrays in JavaScript?
(84 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Using jQuery I would like to compare 2 objects:
sourceArray:
var origArray = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
},
{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 345
},
{
"Name": "Family",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
destination array
var destArray = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
},
{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888
},
{
"Name": "Family",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
What I would like to do, is compare the target object with the source object based on the ID and find the mis-matched entries with a description on the resultant object. So the result will look like this:
var resultArray = [{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888,
"desc": "missing in source"
},
{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 345,
"desc": "missing in destination"
}];
Any quick help is really appreciated.
This isn't a good use of jQuery, but here is some vanilla javascript that does what you want.
function objDiff(array1, array2) {
var resultArray = []
array2.forEach(function(destObj) {
var check = array1.some(function(origObj) {
if(origObj.ID == destObj.ID) return true
})
if(!check) {
destObj.desc = 'missing in source'
resultArray.push(destObj)
}
})
array1.forEach(function(origObj) {
var check = array2.some(function(destObj) {
if(origObj.ID == destObj.ID) return true
})
if(!check) {
origObj.desc = 'missing in destination'
resultArray.push(origObj)
}
})
return resultArray
}
https://jsfiddle.net/9gaxsLbz/1/
If you are wanting to dedupe your array, this will work:
var merged = origArray.concat(destArray);
var unique = merged.filter(function(item) {
return ~this.indexOf(item.ID) ? false : this.push(item.ID);
}, []);
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/Ljzor9c6/
If you are only wanting items that were duped, you can easily invert the condition:
var merged = origArray.concat(destArray);
var dupes = merged.filter(function(item) {
return ~this.indexOf(item.ID) ? true : !this.push(item.ID);
}, []);
You can loop through the items in the first array and put the ID's in a map, then loop through the items in the second array and remove the matching ID's and add the missing.
Then just loop through the map to create the objects in the resulting array:
var origArray = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
},
{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 345
},
{
"Name": "Family",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
var destArray = [{
"Name": "Single",
"URL": "xxx",
"ID": 123
},
{
"Name": "Double",
"URL": "yyy",
"ID": 888
},
{
"Name": "Family",
"URL": "zzz",
"ID": 567
}];
var map = {};
for (var i = 0; i < origArray.length; i++) {
map[origArray[i].ID] = 'source';
}
for (var i = 0; i < destArray.length; i++) {
var id = destArray[i].ID;
if (id in map) {
delete map[id];
} else {
map[id] = 'destination';
}
}
var resultArray = [];
for (key in map) {
var arr = map[key] == 'source' ? origArray : destArray;
for (var i = 0; arr[i].ID != key; i++) ;
resultArray.push({
Name: arr[i].Name,
URL: arr[i].URL,
ID: arr[i].ID,
desc: 'missing in ' + map[key]
});
}
// show result in StackOverflow snippet
document.write(JSON.stringify(resultArray));
var result = [];
for(var i = 0; i < oa.length; i++) {
var idx = mIndexOf(oa[i].ID);
if(idx > -1) {
oa.splice(i, 1);
da.splice(idx, 1);
}
}
for(var i = 0; i < oa.length; i++) {
var ln = result.length;
result[ln] = oa[i];
result[ln].desc = "missing in destination";
}
for(var i = 0; i < da.length; i++) {
var ln = result.length;
result[ln] = da[i];
result[ln].desc = "missing in origin";
}
function mIndexOf(id) {
for(var i = 0; i < oa.length; i++)
if(oa[i].ID == id)
return i;
return -1;
}
console.log(result);
0: Object
ID: 345
Name: "Double"
URL: "yyy"
desc: "missing in destination"
1: Object
ID: 888
Name: "Double"
URL: "yyy"
desc: "missing in origin"
jsfiddle DEMO
For things like this, you should use lodash. With lodash you can just do this:
var resultArray = _.defaults(destArray, origArray);

How can be optimized merging of two arrays of objects?

I would like to optimize my code for CPU and memory consumption. In my function I need to merge two arrays of object into one array. Like UNION, all the ids of the objects in the array have to be unique. I do not want to use third party libraries like Underscore.
This is my function:
var presentation_slides = [
{
"id": "2",
"type": "results"
},
{
"id": "1",
"type": "slide"
},
{
"id": "4",
"type": "questions"
}]
for(var i = 0; i < new_length; i++) {
var my_slide = presentation_slides.filter(function (obj) { return obj.id == i })[0]
if(!my_slide) {
presentation_slides.push({"id": i, "type": "slide"});
}
}
OUTPUT:
var presentation_slides = [
{
"id": "2",
"type": "results"
},
{
"id": "1",
"type": "slide"
},
{
"id": "4",
"type": "questions"
},
{
"id": 0,
"type": "slide"
},
{
"id": 3,
"type": "slide"
}]
Thank you!
EDIT:
Some tests for comparison: http://jsperf.com/how-can-be-optimized-merging-of-two-arrays-of-objects
you can use some instead of filter, i have added a code snipet to your jsperf, which is faster...
check this: .....jsperf.....
for (var i = 0; i < new_length; i++) {
if (!presentation_slides.some(function(obj) { return obj.id == i}))
presentation_slides.push({ "id": i, "type": "slide" });
}
If you just want to merge two arrays, then you can use Array.concat():
var array1 = [
{ id: 1, type: "orange" },
{id: 3, type: "apple" },
{ id: 4, type: "banana" } ],
array2 = [
{ id: 8, type: "strawberry" },
{ id: 9, type: "raspberry" }
];
var array3 = array1.concat(array2);
array3 will contain all the elements from array1 and array2.
This will not check to see if the IDs are unique though.
also, reverse loops are a little faster:
var i = new_length;
while (i--) {
if (!presentation_slides.some(function(obj) { return obj.id == i })) {
presentation_slides.push({ "id": i, "type": "slide" });
}
}
check this ...jspref...

Categories

Resources