Develop Reference

Closing single node server connection closes them all

I barely ask any questions on Stack Overflow, but this one is beyond me. I guess I'm missing something basic as I'm pretty new to Node server.
Our application is pretty basic. The server is supposed to receive a handful of text lines (data), merge and parse them, and once the connection is closed (data sending is over) it sends the data to the api.
var net = require('net');
var fs = require('fs');
const axios = require('axios')
const server = new net.Server();
server.listen(PORT, IP);
server.on("connection", client => {
client.write("Hello\n");
console.log('connected');
let received = "";
client.on("data", data => {
received += data
console.log("Partial data is: " + data);
});
client.on("close", () => {
received = received.toString('utf8');
fs.appendFile('log.txt', received, function (err) {});
received = received.replace(/(?:\r\n|\r|\n)/g, "||");
axios.post(APIADDRESS, {data: received});
console.log('Full data is: '+ {data: received});
});
});
To send the data I'm simply running a netcat or nc using the netcat ipaddress port, that's not a problem. It's connecting fine, status message is received.
The thing is - once I open two or more connections from two DIFFERENT SSh servers something weird happens. I can send the line after line just fine. The server reports back "partial data" debug without problem, for both of them.
However, once I close one of the connections (ctrl+c) they BOTH close.
In the end, only the data from the manually closed connection is received. The other one, from a separate nc on a separate ssh server never reaches the client.on("close") part, it seems. It's just terminated for no reason.
Any ideas? I don't even know where to start.
//EDIT
Just tested it from my pc and some ssh mobile app using separated SSH servers. As soon as ctrl+c is sent at any device it closes the connection for all clients.
//Forgot to mention I'm running pm2 to keep the server up. Once I turned on the script by hand, ignoring pm2 - it works fine. Weird. It is happening because of PM2.

I would guess that you have Putty configured to ‘Share SSH connections if possible’. Per some doc, when doing so:
When this mode is in use, the first PuTTY that connected to a given server becomes the ‘upstream’, which means that it is the one managing the real SSH connection. All subsequent PuTTYs which reuse the connection are referred to as ‘downstreams’: they do not connect to the real server at all, but instead connect to the upstream PuTTY via local inter-process communication methods.
So, if you Ctrl+C the PuTTY session that is managing the actual shared connection, they both lose their connection.
You could presumably disable this shared connection feature at either the client or server end of things since both must be enabled for sharing to occur.

To anyone coming here in the future.
If you are using pm2 with --watch enabled and the text log file is in the same folder as your main server script... That's the reason why it drops the connection after a single client disconnects. It just detects that the log has changed.
I'm not facepalming, that's not even funny.

Try to connect to a server with Google Assistance App

I need to send data out from my google assistance app to a database. In order to do this, I've created a server that takes the data, packages it, and then sends it out. I have the hostname and port and it works in a normal javascript/node.js program but when I use it in my google assistant app nothing happens. I tried figuring out the problem and it looks like the code just isn't connecting. The code I'm using to send data to the server is as follows:
function sendData(app){
var net = require('net');
var message = {"test": 200};
var thisMessage = JSON.stringify(message);
var client = new net.Socket();
client.connect(<port>, '<hostname>', function() {
app.tell(JSON.stringify(client.address()));
console.log('Connected');
client.write(thisMessage);
});
client.on('data', function(data) {
console.log('Received: ' + data);
client.destroy();
});
client.on('close', function() {
console.log('Connection closed');
});
return 0;
}
(NOTE: Port and hostname left out for privacy purposes)
This completely skips over the app.tell, leading me to believe the connection is never made. I know it works asynchronously with the server, however, I don't understand why it isn't connecting whatsoever.
I have tried it both in simulation and on my smartphone with sandbox on and off. Is there a better way to connect? Note that the server I'm connecting to is python-based.

The problem is likely that you're running it on Cloud Functions for Firebase which has a limit on outbound connections under their free "Spark" plan. With this plan, you can only connect to other Google services. This is usually a good way to start understanding how to handle Action requests, but has limitations. To access endpoints outside of Google, you need to upgrade to either their "Flame" fixed price plan or "Blaze" pay-as-you-go plan.
You do not, however, need to run on Google's servers or need to use node.js. All you need is a public HTTPS server with a valid SSL cert. If you are familiar with JSON, you can use any programming language to handle the request and response. If you are familiar with node.js, you just need a node.js server that can create Express request and response objects.

Proper way to monitor/control a server remotely over http in realtime

On my client (a phone with a browser) I want to see the stats of the server CPU,RAM & HDD and gather info from various logs.
I'm using ajax polling.
On the client every 5 sec (setInterval) I call a PHP file:
scan a folder containing N logs
read the last line of each log
convert that to JSON
Problems:
Open new connection every 5 sec.
Multiple AJAX calls.
Request headers (they are also data and so consume bandwidth)
Response headers (^)
Use PHP to read files every 5 sec. even if nothing changed.
The final JSON data is less than 5 KB, but I send it every 5 sec, and there are the headers and new connection every time, so basically every 5 sec., I have to send 5-10 KB to get 5 KB which are 10-20 KB.
Those are 60 sec / 5 sec = 12 new connections per minute and about 15 MB per hour of traffic if I leave the app open.
Lets say I have 100 users that I let monitor / control my server that would be around 1.5 GB outgoing traffic in one hour.
Not to mention that the PHP server is reading multiple files 100 times every 5 sec.
I need something that on the server reads the last lines of those logs every 5 sec and maybe writes them to a file, then I want to push this data to the client only if it's changed.
SSE (server sent events) with PHP
header('Content-Type: text/event-stream');
header('Cache-Control: no-cache');
while(true){
echo "id: ".time()."\ndata: ".ReadTheLogs()."\n\n";
ob_flush();
flush();
sleep(1);
}
In this case after the connection is established with the first user
the connection keeps open (PHP is not made for that) and so I save some space (request headers,response headers). This work on my server bu most server don't allow to keep the connection open for long time.
Also with multiple users I read the log multiple times.(slowing down my old server)
And I can't control the server ... I would need to use ajax to send a command...
I need WebSockets!!!
node.js and websockets
using node.js, from what i understand, i can do all this without consuming alot
of resources and bandwich. The connection keeps open so no unnecessary headers, i can recieve and send data.it handles multiple users very well.
And this is where i need your help.
the node.js server should in background update, and store the logs data every 5 sec if the files are modified.OR should that do the operating system with (iwatch,dnotify...)
the data should be pushed only if changed.
the reading of the logs should be happen only one time after 5 sec ... so not triggered by each user.
this is the first example i have found.....and modified..
var ws=require("nodejs-websocket");
var server=ws.createServer(function(conn){
var data=read(whereToStoreTheLogs);
conn.sendText(data)// send the logs data to the user
//on first connection.
setTimeout(checkLogs,5000);
/*
here i need to continuosly check if the logs are changed.
but if i use setInterval(checkLogs,5000) or setTimeout
every user invokes a new timer and so having lots of timers on the server
can i do that in background?
*/
conn.on("text",function(str){
doStuff(str); // various commands to control the server.
})
conn.on("close",function(code,reason){
console.log("Connection closed")
})
}).listen(8001);
var checkLogs=function(){
var data=read(whereToStoreTheLogs);
if(data!=oldData){
conn.sendText(data)
}
setTimeout(checkLogs,5000);
}
the above script would be the notification server, but i also need to find a solution to store somwhere the info of those multiple logs and do that everytime something is changed, in the background.
How would you do to keep the bandwich low but also the server resources.
How would you do?
EDIT
Btw. is there a way to stream this data simultaneosly to all the clinets?
EDIT
About the logs: i also want to be able to scale the time dilatation between updates... i mean if i read the logs of ffmpeg i ned the update every sec if possible... but when no conversion is active.. i need to get the basic machine info every 5min maybe ... and so on...
GOALS:
1. performant way to read & store somewhere the logs data (only if clinets connected...[mysql,file, it's possible to store this info inside the ram(with node.js??)]).
2. performant way to stream the data to the various clients (simultanously).
3. be able to send commands to the server.. (bidirectional)
4. using web languages (js,php...), lunix commands( something that is easy to implement on multiple machines).. free software if needed.
best approach would be:
read the logs, based on current activity, to the system memory and stream simultaneously and continuosly, with an already open connection, to the various clients with webSockets.
i'don't know anything that could be faster.
UPDATE
The node.js server is up and running, using the http://einaros.github.io/ws/ webSocketServer implementation, as it appears to be the fastest one.
I wrote with the help of #HeadCode the following code to handle properly the client situation & to keep the process as low as possible. checking various things inside the broadcast loop. Now the pushing & the client handling is at a good point.
var
wss=new (require('ws').Server)({port:8080}),
isBusy,
logs,
clients,
i,
checkLogs=function(){
if(wss.clients&&(clients=wss.clients.length)){
isBusy||(logs=readLogs()/*,isBusy=true*/);
if(logs){
i=0;
while(i<clients){
wss.clients[i++].send(logs)
}
}
}
};
setInterval(checkLogs,2000);
But atm i'm using a really bad way to parse the logs.. (nodejs->httpRequest->php).. lol. After some googling i found out that i totally could stream the output of linux software directly to the nodejs app ... i didn't checked... but maybe that would be the best way to do it. node.js also has a filesystem api where icould read the logs. linux has it's own filesystem api.
the readLogs()(can be async) function is still something i'm not happy with.
nodejs filesystem?
linuxSoftware->nodejs output implementation
linux filesystem api.
keep in mind that i need to scan various folders for logs and then parse somehow the outputted data, and this every 2 seconds.
ps.: i adde isBusy to the server variables in case the logReading sytem is async.
EDIT
Answer is not complete.
Missing:
A performant way to read,parse and store the logs somewhere (linux filesystem api, or nodejs api, so the i store directly into system memory)
An explaination if it's possible to stream data directly to multiple users .
apparently nodejs loops trough the clients and so (i think) sending multiple times the data.
btw is it possible/worth to close the node server if there are no clients and restart on new connections on the apache side. (ex: if i connect to the apache hosted html file a script launches the nodejs server again). doing so would further reduce the memory leaking???right?
EDIT
After some experimenting with websockets (some videos are in the comments) i learned some new stuff. Raspberry PI has the possibility to use some CPU DMA channels to to high frequency stuff like PWM... i need to somehow understand how that works.
When using sensors and stuff like that i should store everything inside the RAM, nodejs already does that?? (in a variable inside the script)
websocket remains the best choice as it's basically easely accessible from any device now, simply using a browser.

I haven't used nodejs-websocket, but it looks like it will accept an http connection and do the upgrade as well as creating the server. If all you care about receiving is text/json then I suppose that would be fine, but it seems to me you might want to serve a web page along with it.
Here is a way to use express and socket.io to achieve what you're asking about:
var express = require('express');
var app = express();
var http = require('http').Server(app);
var io = require('socket.io')(http);
app.use(express.static(__dirname + '/'));
app.get('/', function(req, res){
res.sendfile('index.html');
});
io.on('connection', function(socket){
// This is where we should emit the cached values of everything
// that has been collected so far so this user doesn't have to
// wait for a changed value on the monitored host to see
// what is going on.
// This code is based on something I wrote for myself so it's not
// going to do anything for you as is. You'll have to implement
// your own caching mechanism.
for (var stat in cache) {
if (cache.hasOwnProperty(stat)) {
socket.emit('data', JSON.stringify(cache[stat]));
}
}
});
http.listen(3000, function(){
console.log('listening on *:3000');
});
(function checkLogs(){
var data=read(whereToStoreTheLogs);
if(data!=oldData){
io.emit(data)
}
setTimeout(checkLogs,5000);
})();
Of course, the checkLogs function has to be fleshed out by you. I have only cut and pasted it in here for context. The call to the emit function of the io object will send the message out to all connected users but the checkLogs function will only fire once (and then keep calling itself), not every time someone connects.
In your index.html page you can have something like this. It should be included in the html page at the bottom, just before the closing body tag.
<script src="/path/to/socket.io.js"></script>
<script>
// Set up the websocket for receiving updates from the server
var socket = io();
socket.on('data', function(msg){
// Do something with your message here, such as using javascript
// to display it in an appropriate spot on the page.
document.getElementById("content").innerHTML = msg;
});
</script>
By the way, check out the Nodejs documentation for a variety of built-in methods for checking system resources (https://nodejs.org/api/os.html).
Here's also a solution more in keeping with what it appears you want. Use this for your html page:
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>WS example</title>
</head>
<body>
<script>
var connection;
window.addEventListener("load", function () {
connection = new WebSocket("ws://"+window.location.hostname+":8001")
connection.onopen = function () {
console.log("Connection opened")
}
connection.onclose = function () {
console.log("Connection closed")
}
connection.onerror = function () {
console.error("Connection error")
}
connection.onmessage = function (event) {
var div = document.createElement("div")
div.textContent = event.data
document.body.appendChild(div)
}
});
</script>
</body>
</html>
And use this as your web socket server code, recently tweaked to use the 'tail' module (as found in this post: How to do `tail -f logfile.txt`-like processing in node.js?), which you will have to install using npm (Note: tail makes use of fs.watch, which is not guaranteed to work the same everywhere):
var ws = require("nodejs-websocket")
var os = require('os');
Tail = require('tail').Tail;
tail = new Tail('./testlog.txt');
var server = ws.createServer(function (conn) {
conn.on("text", function (str) {
console.log("Received " + str);
});
conn.on("close", function (code, reason) {
console.log("Connection closed");
});
}).listen(8001);
setInterval(function(){ checkLoad(); }, 5000);
function broadcast(mesg) {
server.connections.forEach(function (conn) {
conn.sendText(mesg)
})
}
var load = '';
function checkLoad(){
var new_load = os.loadavg().toString();
if (new_load === 'load'){
return;
}
load = new_load;
broadcast(load);
}
tail.on("line", function(data) {
broadcast(data);
});
Obviously this is very basic and you will have to change it for your needs.

I had made a similar implementation recently using Munin . Munin is a wonderful server monitoring tool, open source too which also provides a REST API. There several plugins available for your needs monitoring CPU, HDD and RAM usage of your server.

You need to build a push notification server. All clients who are listening, will then get a push notification when new data is updated. See this answer for more information: PHP - Push Notifications
As to how you would update the data, I'd suggest using OS-based tools to trigger a PHP script (command line) that will generate an "push" the json file out to any client currently listening. Any new client logging on to "listen" will get served the current json available, until it's updated.
This way you're not subject to 100 users using 100 connections and how much ever bandwidth to poll your server every 5 seconds, and only get updated when they need to know there's an update.

How about a service that reads all the log info (via IPMI, Nagios or whatever) and creates the output files on some schedule. Then anyone that wants to connect can just read this output rather than hammering the server logs. Essentially have one hit on the server logs then everyone else just reads a web page.
This could be implemented pretty easily.
BTW: Nagios has a v nice free edition

Answering just these bits of your question:
performant way to stream the data to the various clients (simultanously).
be able to send commands to the server.. (bidirectional)
using web languages (js,php...), lunix commands( something that is easy to implement on multiple machines).. free software if needed.
I'll recommend the Bayeux protocol as made simple by the CometD project. There are implementations in a variety of languages and it's really easy to use in its simplest form.
Meteor is broadly similar. It's an application development framework rather than a family of libraries, but it solves the same problems.

Some suggestions:
Munin for charts
NetSNMP (used by Munin, but you can also use Bash and Cron to build traps that send SMS texts on alerts)
Pingdom for remote alerts about how well the server is responding to ping and HTTP checks. It can SMS text you or call a phone, as well as have call escalation rules.

Node.js http-proxy drops websocket requests

Okay, I've spent over a week trying to figure this out to no avail, so if anyone has a clue, you are a hero. This isn't going to be an easy question to answer, unless I am being a dunce.
I am using node-http-proxy to proxy sticky sessions to 16 node.js workers running on different ports.
I use Socket.IO's Web Sockets to handle a bunch of different types of requests, and use traditional requests as well.
When I switched my server over to proxying via node-http-proxy, a new problem crept up in that sometimes, my Socket.IO session cannot establish a connection.
I literally can't stably reproduce it for the life of me, with the only way to turn it on being to throw a lot of traffic from multiple clients to the server.
If I reload the user's browser, it can then sometimes re-connect, and sometimes not.
Sticky Sessions
I have to proxy sticky sessions as my app authenticates on a per-worker basis, and so it routes a request based on its Connect.SID cookie (I am using connect/express).
Okay, some code
This is my proxy.js file that runs in node and routes to each of the workers:
var http = require('http');
var httpProxy = require('http-proxy');
// What ports the proxy is routing to.
var data = {
proxyPort: 8888,
currentPort: 8850,
portStart: 8850,
portEnd: 8865,
};
// Just gives the next port number.
nextPort = function() {
var next = data.currentPort++;
next = (next > data.portEnd) ? data.portStart : next;
data.currentPort = next;
return data.currentPort;
};
// A hash of Connect.SIDs for sticky sessions.
data.routes = {}
var svr = httpProxy.createServer(function (req, res, proxy) {
var port = false;
// parseCookies is just a little function
// that... parses cookies.
var cookies = parseCookies(req);
// If there is an SID passed from the browser.
if (cookies['connect.sid'] !== undefined) {
var ip = req.connection.remoteAddress;
if (data.routes[cookies['connect.sid']] !== undefined) {
// If there is already a route assigned to this SID,
// make that route's port the assigned port.
port = data.routes[cookies['connect.sid']].port;
} else {
// If there isn't a route for this SID,
// create the route object and log its
// assigned port.
port = data.currentPort;
data.routes[cookies['connect.sid']] = {
port: port,
}
nextPort();
}
} else {
// Otherwise assign a random port, it will/
// pick up a connect SID on the next go.
// This doesn't really happen.
port = nextPort();
}
// Now that we have the chosen port,
// proxy the request.
proxy.proxyRequest(req, res, {
host: '127.0.0.1',
port: port
});
}).listen(data.proxyPort);
// Now we handle WebSocket requests.
// Basically, I feed off of the above route
// logic and try to route my WebSocket to the
// same server regular requests are going to.
svr.on('upgrade', function (req, socket, head) {
var cookies = parseCookies(req);
var port = false;
// Make sure there is a Connect.SID,
if (cookies['connect.sid'] != undefined) {
// Make sure there is a route...
if (data.routes[cookies['connect.sid']] !== undefined) {
// Assign the appropriate port.
port = data.routes[cookies['connect.sid']].port;
} else {
// this has never, ever happened, i've been logging it.
}
} else {
// this has never, ever happened, i've been logging it.
};
if (port === false) {
// this has never happened...
};
// So now route the WebSocket to the same port
// as the regular requests are getting.
svr.proxy.proxyWebSocketRequest(req, socket, head, {
host: 'localhost',
port: port
});
});
Client Side / The Phenomena
Socket connects like so:
var socket = io.connect('http://whatever:8888');
After about 10 seconds on logging on, I get this error back on this listener, which doesn't help much.
socket.on('error', function (data) {
// this is what gets triggered. ->
// Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at ws://whatever:8888/socket.io/1/websocket/Nnx08nYaZkLY2N479KX0.
});
The Socket.IO GET request that the browser sends never comes back - it just hangs in pending, even after the error comes back, so it looks like a timeout error. The server never responds.
Server Side - A Worker
This is how a worker receives a socket request. Pretty simple. All workers have the same code, so you think one of them would get the request and acknowledge it...
app.sio.socketio.sockets.on('connection', function (socket) {
// works... some of the time! all of my workers run this
// exact same process.
});
Summary
That's a lot of data, and I doubt anyone is willing to confront it, but i'm totally stumped, don't know where to check next, log next, whatever, to solve it. I've tried everything I know to see what the problem is, to no avail.
UPDATE
Okay, I am fairly certain that the problem is in this statement on the node-http-proxy github homepage:
node-http-proxy is <= 0.8.x compatible, if you're looking for a >=
0.10 compatible version please check caronte
I am running Node.js v0.10.13, and the phenomena is exactly as some have commented in github issues on this subject: it just drops websocket connections randomly.
I've tried to implement caronte, the 'newer' fork, but it is not at all documented and I have tried my hardest to piece together their docs in a workable solution, but I can't get it forwarding websockets, my Socket.IO downgrades to polling.
Are there any other ideas on how to get this implemented and working? node-http-proxy has 8200 downloads yesterday! Sure someone is using a Node build from this year and proxying websockets....
What I am look for exactly
I want to accomplish a proxy server (preferrably Node) that proxies to multiple node.js workers, and which routes the requests via sticky sessions based on a browser cookie. This proxy would need to stably support traditional requests as well as web sockets.
Or...
I don't mind accomplishing the above via clustered node workers, if that works. My only real requirement is maintaining sticky sessions based on a cookie in the request header.
If there is a better way to accomplish the above than what I am trying, I am all for it.

In general I don't think node is not the most used option as a proxy server, I, for one use nginx as a frontend server for node and it's a really great combination. Here are some instructions to install and use the nginx sticky sessions module.
It's a lightweight frontend server with json like configuration, solid and very well tested.
nginx is also a lot faster if you want to serve static pages, css. It's ideal to configure your caching headers, redirect traffic to multiple servers depending on domain, sticky sessions, compress css and javascript, etc.
You could also consider a pure load balancing open source solution like HAProxy. In any case I don't believe node is the best tool for this, it's better to use it to implement your backend only and put something like nginx in front of it to handle the usual frontend server tasks.

I agree with hexacyanide. To me it would make the most sense to queue workers through a service like redis or some kind of Message Query system. Workers would be queued through Redis Pub/Sub functionality by web nodes(which are proxied). Workers would callback upon error, finish, or stream data in realtime with a 'data' event. Maybe check out the library kue. You could also roll your own similar library. RabbitMQ is another system for similar purpose.
I get using socket.io if you're already using that technology, but you need to use tools for their intended purpose. Redis or a MQ system would make the most sense, and pair great with websockets(socket.io) to create realtime, insightful applications.
Session Affinity(sticky sessions) is supported through Elastic LoadBalancer for aws, this supports webSockets. A PaaS provider(Modulus) does this exactly. Theres also satalite which provides sticky sessions for node-http-proxy, however I have no idea if it supports webSockets.

I've been looking into something very similar to this myself, with the intent of generating (and destroying) Node.js cluster nodes on the fly.
Disclaimer: I'd still not recommend doing this with Node; nginx is more stable for the sort of design architecture that you're looking for, or even more so, HAProxy (very mature, and easily supports sticky-session proxying). As #tsturzl indicates, there is satellite, but given the low volume of downloads, I'd tread carefully (at least in a production environment).
That said, since you appear to have everything already set up with Node, rebuilding and re-architecting may be more work than it's worth. Therefore, to install the caronte branch with NPM:
Remove your previous http-node-proxy Master installation with npm uninstall node-proxy and/or sudo npm -d uninstall node-proxy
Download the caronte branch .zip and extract it.
Run npm -g install /path/to/node-http-proxy-caronte
In my case, the install linkage was broken, so I had to run sudo npm link http-proxy
I've got it up and running using their basic proxy example -- whether or not this resolves your dropped sessions issue or not, only you will know.

Multiple Websockets

I'm trying to use two websockets on one page. This is my code:
var pageViewWs = new WebSocket("ws://localhost:9002/pageView");
var sessionWs = new WebSocket("ws://localhost:9002/session");
pageViewWs.onmessage = function (event) {
alert("PageView");
};
sessionWs.onmessage = function (event) {
alert("Session");
};
Only the PageView alert appears. On the server side no requests are made to /session, only to /pageView.
Now, if I switch var pageViewWs and var sessionWs around then the Session alert is shown instead of the PageView. It is not because they are alerts, I've tried appending to the body and to divs and I've stepped through using Firebug. It seems that only one WebSocket can be created at a time although in Firebug the properties for pageViewWs and sessionWs appear the same with the exception of their url.
I've only tested this in Firefox 15.0.1. Is there some sort of Websocket limitation whereby you can only run one at a time? Or is something wrong with my code?

I faced the same problem to run multiple services through the same port. So, I created a PHP library to do this.
Why ?
Some free plans of hosting providers don't allow you to bind to ports or allow you to bind to one port. In case of OpenShift Cloud Server, you can only bind to port 8080. So, running multiple WebSocket services is not possible. In this case, Francium DiffSocket is useful.
You can run different services on the same port using a PHP library called Francium DiffSocket.
After setting up Francium DiffSocket, you can do this for using different services :
var chatWS = new WebSocket("ws://ws.example.com:8000/?service=chat");
var gameWS = new WebSocket("ws://ws.example.com:8000/?service=game");
An example are these services which are running through a single port :
Finding Value Of Pi
Advanced Live Group Chat With PHP, jQuery & WebSocket
Live Group Chat With PHP, jQuery & WebSocket

I believe you can only create one WebSocket connection from a client to a specific port on the host. Have you tried either running the two services on different ports, or on different servers? This would allow you to determine the limitation...

Apart from the HTTP Request head both the request are the same. They hit the same application server on the same port. It is up to the server side application to treat each connection differently based on the HTTP request that initiated it.
I've done this in node. You could do it manually but packages like
espress-ws
or express-ws-routes
eases the process.