A simplified version of my problem is that I want to center a 'text' div over an 'image' div on screen mode, but position them underneath each other on mobile.
HTML
<div class="wrapper">
<article> </article>
<div class="text-cell">
<h2>Title</h2>
<h3>Category</h3>
</div>
</div>
css
.wrapper {
position: relative;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
article {
height: 350px;
width: 100%;
border-top: 1px solid #000;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.text-cell {
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 768px) {
.text-cell {
position: relative;
border-top: solid 1px #000;
background-color: rgba(250, 250, 250, 1);
}
}
This is the closest I got. It puts the 'text-cell' overtop of article at screen size and underneath on mobile size.
I want it to be vertically centred over the 'article' on screen size, as it resizes. 'text-cell' doesn't have a defined size, and Ideally I'd like article to be a percentage or a more responsive size, but that isn't as important.
EDIT - this html is part of a Wordpress loop, meaning it is generated a certain amount of times, and each one is stacked under the other. (for ex. 3 copies of < div class="wrapper" > stacked)
What I am going for
The first thing i'd recommend doing is placing that .text-cell div above the article, that way, on mobile, it's statically where you want it to be placed, following the document natural hierarchy. This is what i've done in the code snippet (i've also changed its position to static inside the media query.)
Having said that, i would personally consider changing the structure of the HTML to have more semantic meaning (for example, placing the h2 & h3 tags inside a header tag and place that inside your article tag.)
If you want help doing that, explain what you're trying to achieve inside the article, and i'm happy to help you achieve what you're looking for.
.wrapper {
position: relative;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
article {
height: 350px;
width: 100%;
border-top: 1px solid #000;
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.text-cell {
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 768px) {
.text-cell {
position: static;
border-top: solid 1px #000;
background-color: rgba(250, 250, 250, 1);
}
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="text-cell">
<h2>The title</h2>
<h3>The category</h3>
</div>
<article style="background-image:url('http://placehold.it/300x300');">
</article>
</div>
Related
I was wondering if you can help me with this.
I have a div (in white) where I need to put two circular buttons (in green) on the borders. Everything should be done with CSS.
It should look like this:
Screenshot
Now, the thing is that I don't know the size of the white div, and I won't know it at the time of creation, because it will get added to the DOM afterwards. All I know is that the white div has a percentage width and height relative to its future parent. So, at the time of creation, since it's not yet added, any calls to width(), height() or its css values won't work.
I've seen all those snippets that tell you how to make a div with a fixed aspect ratio. I need this now, I need the button to be 1:1, but all I know about the dimensions, is that it has to be 100% of the height of the white div (and therefore, its width should be equal as its height). All the examples I've seen assume that you know the width and to make the height keep the ratio. In my case, what I know is the height (100%) and I want the width to adapt.
I have no idea how to achieve this.
This is my snippet:
body{
background-color: #DCDCDC;
}
.container {
width: 50%;
height: 7%;
background: white;
border-radius: 20px;
position: absolute;
}
.arrow {
background: green;
border-radius: 20px;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
.arrow:after{
content: "";
display: block;
padding-right: 100%;
}
.arrow:last-child {
right: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="arrow"></div>
<div class="arrow"></div>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/7bxecL9m/
If you know how can I do this without entering any fixed value (jQuery use is of course valid), I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
There are many variables here:
Since container's height is % and circle radius is px units, one is static and the other one will resize.
The only way to preserve 1:1 with just html/css, considering the container's height % will resize circle's height as well, would be to isolate circle's div width & height to something static like px units.
Now, since you said no fixed dimensions, the only thing I can think of is to comment .arrow's 100% height, to prevent resizing other than 1:1, and nesting a div inside .arrow to restrain 1:1 with static units (ideally impacting .arrow directly would be less code but if you don't want/can't set them on that element, maybe you consider this).
If you want the circle to remain circular as the content expands, you need to dynamically adjust the height to match the width. You could use Javascript to achieve this, but your border-radius is tied to container's in px static units, since container will always be bigger something like border-radius: 50% wouldn't work for both, 50% radius of circle would never match 50% of container's (that is, if you care about radius alignment).
body {
background-color: #DCDCDC;
}
body,
html {
height: 100%;
}
.container {
width: 50%;
height: 37%;
background: white;
border-radius: 20px;
position: relative;
}
.arrow {
background: green;
border-radius: 20px;
/*height: 100%;*/
position: absolute;
overflow: hidden;
}
.bLimit {
height: 40px;
width: 40px;
line-height: 40px;
}
.arrow:after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-right: 100%;
}
.arrow:last-child {
right: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="arrow">
<div class="bLimit">button overflow</div>
</div>
<div class="arrow">
<div class="bLimit">button</div>
</div>
</div>
Why not doing a fixed width in percent for your arrow :
.arrow {
background: green;
border-radius: 20px;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
width: 10%;
}
body{
background-color: #DCDCDC;
}
.container {
width: 50%;
height: 7%;
background: white;
border-radius: 20px;
position: absolute;
}
.container:after,.container:before{
content: " ";
display: block;
padding: 4%;
z-index: 999;
top: 0;
position:absolute;
background: green;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.container:before {
left: 0;
}
.container:after{
right: 0;
}
<div class="container">
</div>
You can achieve using before and after CSS pseudo selectors. You check this Example.
There is a posibility to get this result using a image (that won't show) of the required ratio.
In this case, the ratio is 1:1 so we will use an image of 50px (but it can be any size)
.container {
width: 300px;
height: 20px;
border: solid 1px blue;
margin: 40px;
position: relative;
}
.container:nth-child(2) {
height: 40px;
}
.container:nth-child(3) {
height: 60px;
}
.arrow {
height: 100%;
background-color: red;
opacity: 0.5;
position: absolute;
border-radius: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
.arrow:last-child {
right: 0px;
transform: translateX(50%);
}
img {
height: 100%;
opacity: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
<div class="arrow">
<img src="https://placehold.it/50x50">
</div>
</div>
I want to create a website with a single fixed-width centered column and an additional fixed-width sidebar that is position: fixed on the left. When the window is large, this works perfectly, but when I resize the window, they begin to overlap when there's plenty of room left on the right side of the window. For example:
I'd like the center div to be positioned in the center until it runs into the sidebar, at which point I'd like it to have a more fluid responsive design, where the sidebar starts to push the div to the right as you resize the window. For example:
The only solution I'm aware of is something like this (using the jQuery resize event and adding a class to the center column when the window resizes small enough):
var SMALL_WINDOW_SIZE = 560;
function checkWindowSize() {
var $content = $("#content");
if ($(this).width() < SMALL_WINDOW_SIZE && !$content.hasClass("smallWindow")) {
$content.addClass("smallWindow");
} else if ($(this).width() >= SMALL_WINDOW_SIZE && $content.hasClass("smallWindow")) {
$content.removeClass("smallWindow");
}
}
$(document).ready(function() {
checkWindowSize();
});
$(window).resize(function() {
checkWindowSize();
});
#sidebar {
background: orange;
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
position: fixed;
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
}
#content {
background: blue;
width: 300px;
height: 350px;
margin: 0px auto;
}
.smallWindow {
float: left;
margin-left: 120px !important;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id='sidebar'></div>
<div id="content"></div>
I can't help but feel there should be a pure CSS solution or one that uses less or more elegant JavaScript. Is there such a thing?
This isn't by any means the best way of achieving the desired effect with CSS, but it's the methodology behind using CSS media queries to adapt layout that I want to convey.
Obviously if this meets your needs, you'll want to adjust the numbers/widths to suit your case.
*, :before, :after{
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
padding: 20px;
}
.sidebar, .main {
padding: 20px
}
.sidebar {
position: fixed;
top: 20px;
left: 20px;
width: 200px;
background: goldenrod;
color: white;
height: 50vh;
}
.main {
margin-left: 220px;
background: mediumblue;
color: white;
height: 200vh;
}
#media (min-width: 1050px){
.main{
margin: 0 220px 0 220px;
}
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="sidebar">
Sidebar
</div>
<div class="main">
Main
</div>
</div>
ยป JSBin
I'm trying to do what many have asked before, but even after trying everything I still can't get the results I want.
I have an image 600px by 1600px, 4 images of 600px by 400px in a vertical line. I want to show 600px by 400px of the image at any one time. Ideally I would be able to hover over an element somewhere on my page and move the image upwards to reveal the other portions of the 600px by 400px image. In effect, I'd have 4 images viewable by hovering over 4 the elements.
I've tried various css3 and jquery solution but none have worked. I would appreciate any help with this.
HTML
<div class="mainimage">
<div class="buttonsection">
<div class="button1">Button 1</div>
<div class="button2">Button 2</div>
<div class="button3">Button 3</div>
<div class="button4">Button 4</div>
</div><!--end of buttonsection-->
<div class="rollingimage">
<img src="IMG/four-pics.png">
</div><!--end of rollingimage-->
</div><!--end of mainimage-->
</div><!--end of main content-->
CSS
.mainimage {
position: relative;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 900px;
height: 400px;
border: 2px solid #E78F25;
margin: 0 10px 20px 0;
}
.buttonsection {
width: 290px;
height: 400px;
position: relative;
float: left;
}
.button1,
.button2,
.button3,
.button4 {
display: inline;
height: 98px;
width: 290px;
border: 1px solid #E78F24;
text-align: center;
float: left;
}
.rollingimage {
width: 598px;
height: 400px;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
float: right;
}
jquery
$(document).ready(function(){
$(".button1").hover(function(){
$('.rollingimage').stop().animate({'top': '-200px'}, 1500);
});
});
Here is the jsfidle: http://jsfiddle.net/dirtyd77/jCvYm/1/
Thanks yet again
Gary
Just for fun, no JS:
http://jsfiddle.net/coma/MTWdb/5/
HTML
<div id="foo">
Button 1
Button 2
Button 3
Button 4
<div></div>
</div>
CSS
#foo {
width: 400px;
border: 2px solid #E78F25;
position: relative;
}
#foo > div {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 200px;
background: #fff url(http://placekitten.com/600/1600) no-repeat 0 0;
transition: background-position .5s;
}
#foo > a {
display: block;
width: 200px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
}
#foo > a + a {
border-top: 1px solid #E78F25;
}
#foo > a:nth-child(1):hover ~ div {
background-position: 0 0;
}
#foo > a:nth-child(2):hover ~ div {
background-position: 0 -400px;
}
#foo > a:nth-child(3):hover ~ div {
background-position: 0 -800px;
}
#foo > a:nth-child(4):hover ~ div {
background-position: 0 -1200px;
}
You need to change the positioning of the image inside the div, not the div itself. To animate my example, you could add CSS transitions for better performance than JS animations.
http://jsfiddle.net/jCvYm/8/
$('.rollingimage').find('img')
As Dom mentioned, the jsFiddle you provided didn't reference the jQuery library. It also didn't included any actual images, and only contained code for one of the three buttons. I doubt those were the original problems you were having, though. (The missing reference to jQuery might have been.)
Once I had those straightened out, I noticed that hovering the button caused the picture to slide out of the screen, instead of scrolling. The simplest way to fix that is to move the img element, instead of moving the div. (The more natural way would be to change the scroll position of the div, but I don't recall how to do that off the top of my head.)
Added CSS:
.rollingimage img {
position: relative;
}
New JS:
$(document).ready(function(){
$(".button1").hover(function(){
$('.rollingimage img').stop().animate({'top': '0px'}, 1500);
});
$(".button2").hover(function(){
$('.rollingimage img').stop().animate({'top': '-400px'}, 1500);
});
$(".button3").hover(function(){
$('.rollingimage img').stop().animate({'top': '-800px'}, 1500);
});
$(".button4").hover(function(){
$('.rollingimage img').stop().animate({'top': '-1200px'}, 1500);
});
});
jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jCvYm/6/
I have some div's with position:fixed all around the page.
one of that div has little more long content.
my aim is that I want to scroll the content inside that box, using the main browser/page scroll-bar. (its not normal overflow:auto like this)
this is the exact situation
http://s7.postimage.org/d6xl1u9mz/sample.jpg
is any plugin available ?
Without knowledge of your HTML:
<body>
<section id="bodyContent"></section>
<header></header>
<section id="lSide"></section>
<section id="rSide"></section>
</body>
#bodyContent {
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
min-height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 90px 45px 0px 105px;
background-clip: content-box;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
}
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-image: url(page_background.jpg);
background-attachment: fixed;
}
header, #lSide, #rSide {
position: fixed;
}
header {
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 90px;
background-image: url(page_background.jpg);
background-attachment: fixed;
}
#lSide {
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 105px;
padding: 90px 0 0 0;
}
#rSide {
right: 0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 45px;
padding: 90px 0 0 0;
}
This will force the contents of #bodyContent to sit inside the opening between the various border elements, and it will cause any overflow to trigger a scrollbar on the body element as you desire. JSFiddle
Maybe it's possible. I've created a jsFiddle which does the trick. It's not perfect, but you can develope it further... Also this snippet works only with modern browsers, but is easy to fix for older IEs too. Core code below.
JavaScript:
window.onload = function () {
var content = document.getElementById('contentwrapper'),
dimdiv = document.getElementById('scrollingheight'),
wrapHeight = document.getElementById('fixed').offsetHeight,
scroller = function () {
content.style.top = -(document.documentElement.scrollTop || document.body.scrollTop) + 5 + 'px';
return;
};
dimdiv.style.minHeight = (content.scrollHeight - wrapHeight + 2 * 5) + 'px';
window.addEventListener('scroll', scroller, false);
return;
}
CSS:
#fixed {
position: fixed;
min-width: 300px;
min-height: 200px;
max-height: 200px;
background: #fff;
left: 150px;
top: 200px;
overflow-y: hidden;
border: 1px solid #000;
}
#contentwrapper {
max-width: 290px;
position: absolute;
top: 5px;
left: 5px;
}
#scrollingheight {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
visibility: hidden;
min-width: 1px;
}
HTML:
<div id="scrollingheight"></div>
<div id="fixed">
<div id="contentwrapper">
content
</div>
</div>
Notice, that all content in the body, but #scrollingheight, must be fixed. Constant 5 is related to #contentwrapper's top value.
AFAIK you cannot do that.
At least not without some wicked JS trickery.
Why? cause you cannot force the browser's default scrollbar height (make it smaller) to embrace some content that is inside a totally different area than the html, body (document).
My suggestion is that you build a custom scrollbar, calculate the height of your nice overflow hidden area, add it to the scrollable ratio calculation.
There's a mysterious whitespace along the right of my site in firefox (on both PC and Mac, latest versions) and I can't for the life of me figure out what's causing it.
This is what it looks like -
I've been searching the CSS for ages now trying to figure out if it's some margin or padding issue but I can't find anything.
Also, if I remove the div ID 'slider3' the issue seems to disappear, yet I can't figure out how this div is causing the whitespace, since it has no CSS applied to it - it's simply a container.
Here's my site http://www.simplerweb.co.uk
Here's some relevant code so the answer is useful for people later on.
<div class="fullw">
<div class="sliderleft"></div>
<div class="sliderright"></div>
<div id="slider3">
<div class="quote">
<div class="centmid">
<h1 class="fronth">Hello</h1>
<h2 class="frontp">Welcome to Simpler Web</h2>
<h2 class="frontp2">We're an Edinburgh based Web<br> Design Agency</h2>
</div><!-- end div centmid -->
</div> <!-- end div quotes1 -->
<div class="quote2">
<div class="centmid">
<h2 class="frontb">We make wonderful, cross platform <br> accessible Websites </h2>
</div> <!-- end div centmid -->
</div> <!-- end div quotes2 -->
<div class="quote3">
<div class="centmid">
<h2 class="frontc">We can translate your ideas into reality </h2>
</div> <!-- end div centmid -->
</div><!-- end div quotes3 -->
</div> <!-- #slider3 -->
</div>
CSS
/* The following styles are essential to the slider's functionality */
.plusslider {
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
padding-top: 140px; /* The height / width of the slider should never be set via the CSS. The padding increases the slider box-model while keeping it dynamic */
}
.plusslider-container { position: relative; }
/* Slides must have a set width - even though they may be dynamic. If no width is set on <img> slides, the default image size will be assumed */
div.child { width: 480px; }
.plusslider .child { float: left; }
/* PlusFader Specific (not needed with plustype:slider */
.plustype-fader .child { display: none; position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0; }
.plustype-fader .current { z-index: 5; }
/* End PlusFader Specific */
/* No-javascript fallback -- change "#slider" and "#slider2" identifiers as needed for your html */
#slider > * { display: none; }
#slider > *:first-child, #slider2 > *:first-child { display: block; }
/* End no-javascript fallback */
/* End essential styles*/
/* The following styles are not essential for slider functionality. They are specific to the example content.
It is important to note that the fading effect does not work correctly with non-image content unless that
content area has a solid background (either a background image or a background-color, but not transparent).
Slides to not have to be the same width or height, but if you'd like a consistent width and/or height, make sure to set that within the CSS! */
#slider .slide1 { padding-left: 40px; padding-right: 40px; margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; }
#slider .slide1 { height: 210px; padding-top: 20px; padding-bottom: 20px; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0; }
.slide1 { height: 500px; padding: 20px 40px; }
.slide1 h2 { color: #fff; font-size: 20px; margin: 0 0 20px 0; text-align: left; }
.slide1 p { border-left: 3px solid #fff; color: #fff; padding: 0 0 0 10px; }
.quote, .quote2, .quote3 { height:400px; padding: 20px 0; width: 980px; width: 100%; position: relative; }
.quote { background-image: url(../images/weare.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.quote2 { background-image: url(../images/headlogosandroid.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.quote3 { background-image: url(../images/ideafront.png); background-position: center; background-repeat: no-repeat; }
.plusslider a img { border: none; } /* Prevent blue borders in IE (not only does it look ugly, but it messes up spacing which breaks the "slider" type */
.plusslider-pagination { position: absolute; left: 0; bottom: 0; }
.plusslider-pagination li { float: left; list-style: none; margin-left: 5px; }
#slider3 {margin: 0; padding: 0;}
You have (in FF) exactly 17px extra width that is exactly the width of the browser scrollbar.
Your starting (initial) loading black screen (that animates) leaves a glitch of 17px:
cause it's animation maintains the DOM width that equals the screen width without the right scrollbar (100% screen width).
After the page is fully loaded and the scrollbar is added to the page, it actually adds the extra 17px (to the 100%) width that were maintained by the Loading animation.
Hope I put you in the right direction.
By the way, try to add:
html {
overflow-y: scroll;
}
and - if still needed - adjust the loading element width as I mentioned before.
Add this:
body{
overflow-x: hidden;
}
Problem solved. (temporarily)
So where is the problem?
It is at your <div> with the classes plusslider slider3 plustype-slider. You are constantly setting an incorrect width to it. You have to subtract the scrollbar width.
You can also try to do this: Padding: 0px(or whatever) 17px; and margin: 0px(or whatever) -17px; now your whitespace at the sides are gone.