I'm looking for a solution to change the texture/pattern for a product.
At this moment i have:
A .png picture of a couch with a transparent background
A .png picture of a texture
With the following code:
<canvas id="a" width="800" height="500">Canvas not supported on your browser</canvas>
var width = $(window).width();
var height = $(window).height();
var c = document.getElementById("a");
var ctx = c.getContext("2d");
var can2 = document.createElement('canvas');
document.body.appendChild(can2)
can2.width = c.width;
can2.height = c.height;
var ctx2 = can2.getContext("2d");
var test = new Image();
test.src = "Images/newBank.png";
test.onload = function () {
ctx2.drawImage(test, 0, 0);
};
var img = new Image();
img.src = "Images/texturetrans.png";
img.onload = function () {
ctx2.globalCompositeOperation = 'source-in';
var ptrn = ctx2.createPattern(img, 'repeat');
ctx2.fillStyle = ptrn;
ctx2.fillRect(0, 0, can2.width, can2.height);
}
`
I get this result:
As you can see, the whole object is filled with my texture. No definitions of the pillows etc. are visible anymore. Is it possible to let my texture be a sort of transparent mask?
I'm already able to change the color of the couch:
But I'd like to be able to also add a pattern to my couch!
Any help will be appreciated and I'm already very sorry for my bad English.
If you're just after an illustrative approximation you can use a combination of blending and composition modes.
First thing is to make sure your main image has transparency - this is important for composition to work (I made a rough cut-off in the following demo).
Main steps:
Draw the pattern
Draw the main image on top with blending mode multiply
Draw the main image on top with compositing mode destination-in - this will make a cut-out
If you want to reduce the size of the pattern you can either do this by using a smaller version of the image, draw to a temporary canvas at a smaller size and use that as pattern, or use the new transform methods on the pattern itself.
Demo
var img1 = new Image, img2 = new Image, cnt = 2,
canvas = document.getElementById("canvas"),
ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
// image loading for demo (ignore)
img1.onload = img2.onload = function() {if (!--cnt) go()};
img1.src = "//i.imgur.com/8WqH9v4.png"; // sofa
img2.src = "//i.stack.imgur.com/sQlu8.png"; // pattern
// MAIN CODE ---
function go() {
// create a pattern
ctx.fillStyle = ctx.createPattern(img2, "repeat");
// fill canvas with pattern
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height);
// use blending mode multiply
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "multiply";
// draw sofa on top
ctx.drawImage(img1, 0, 0, img1.width*.5, img1.height*.5);
// change composition mode
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "destination-in";
// draw to cut-out sofa
ctx.drawImage(img1, 0, 0, img1.width*.5, img1.height*.5);
}
<canvas id="canvas" width=600 height=400></canvas>
You can also reverse the order of which image is drawn etc., if you prefer. This is just an example of one way.
If you need accurate texture then there is no way around to either take photos or use a 3D software, or hand-drawn the textures.
NOTE: IE does not support multiply - For this you need to manually iterate through the pixels and multiply each component with each other.
You can test for support this way:
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "multiply";
if (ctx.globalCompositeOperation === "multiply") {
// blend as above
}
else {
// iterate and blend manually
}
Blending mode luminosity is mentioned in comments and this can be used too of course. I just want to point a couple of things to consider. The first is that this is a non-separable blending mode meaning it depends on all components as it goes through the HSL color model. This makes it a bit more compute intensive.
The second is that if you end up having to do this manually (in for example IE) the code is a bit more complex to emulate, and will be noticeably slower.
Related
I have a PNG graphic I want to use as a background for my canvas in JS. It should be displayed in a tiled format. For this I'm currently doing something like this.
const ratioX = Math.ceil(canvas.width / image.width);
const ratioY = Math.ceil(canvas.height / image.height);
for (var x = 0; x < ratioX; x++) {
for (var y = 0; y < ratioY; y++) {
ctx.drawImage(image, x*image.width, y*image.height, image.width, image.height);
}
}
It's working as intended, but the performance might get improved by not doing the calculations every frame, but buffering the bigger tiled version of my image. So I'm looking for a way to create this image as an instance of the Image class or any other class I can use for drawImage().
At first I might need to get the image data (so the rgba info for every pixel). I've seen a way to do it like here, using canvas's context, but do I really need to do that? Is there no simpler way?
The second step would be to create a drawable image object out of that data. How would I do that?
I would love to see a way that's equivalent to Java's bufferedImage.getRgb(x, y) and bufferedImage.setRgb(x, y, color). Does something like this exist in JS?
As shown here in W3Schools you can use ctx createPattern to achieve what you want:
var ctx = document.getElementById("canvas").getContext("2d");
var img = new Image();
img.src = 'http://placehold.it/50/50'
img.onload = function() {
var pat = ctx.createPattern(img, 'repeat');
ctx.rect(0, 0, 350, 350);
ctx.fillStyle = pat;
ctx.fill();
};
<canvas id='canvas' width=350 height=350/>
I am new to canvas, I have an image myimg.jpg, I have converted this image into canvas and i am trying to apply some pattern image for heel.
I am not able to do it. Here is my screenshot:
How can I get it done.
<div id="myId">
<canvas id="canvaswrapper" width="660" height="540"></canvas>
</div>
function drawImage(){
var ctx = $("canvas")[0].getContext("2d"),
img = new Image();
img.onload = function(){
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0, 500, 500);
ctx.beginPath();
var img2= new Image();
var w;
var h;
img2.src = "http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e555bd971bc2f4910893cd5b785c30ff?s=128&d=identicon&r=PG";
var pattern = ctx.createPattern(img2, "repeat");
ctx.fillStyle = pattern;
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, w, h);
ctx.arc(300,305,50,0,2*Math.PI);
ctx.fill();
ctx.stroke();
};
img.src = "myimg.jpg";
}
drawImage();
You can define the area you want to fill using an image mask that fits on top of your image - this step is something for Photoshop/GIMP.
For example, having your shoe as-is:
Create a mask for it leaving the heal in the original position (it makes it easier to draw it back in - you can always crop it and draw it using an offset instead). Important: background must be transparent:
Then super-impose the pattern using these steps:
Load the pattern and define is as a fill-pattern
Draw the mask into the empty canvas
Optional step: Adjust transformations if needed (translate, scale)
Choose composite mode "source-atop"
Fill the canvas
Choose composite mode "destination-atop"
Draw the main image on top (which will show behind the mask/pattern)
Optional step: draw in original mask image using blending mode "multiply" to add shadow and highlights (does not work in IE). This will help creating an illusion of depth. For IE, drawing it on top using a reduced alpha or a separate image only containing shadows etc. can be an option
Result
Example
var iShoe = new Image, iMask = new Image, iPatt = new Image, count = 3;
iShoe.onload = iMask.onload = iPatt.onload = loader;
iShoe.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/hqL1C.png";
iMask.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/k5XWN.png";
iPatt.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/CEQ10.png";
function loader() {
if (--count) return; // wait until all images has loaded
var ctx = document.querySelector("canvas").getContext("2d"),
pattern = ctx.createPattern(iPatt, "repeat");
// draw in mask
ctx.drawImage(iMask, 0, 0);
// change comp mode
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-atop";
// fill mask
ctx.scale(0.5, 0.5); // scale: 0.5
ctx.fillStyle = pattern; // remember to double the area to fill:
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, ctx.canvas.width*2, ctx.canvas.height*2);
ctx.setTransform(1,0,0,1,0,0); // reset transform
// draw shoe behind mask
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "destination-atop";
ctx.drawImage(iShoe, 0, 0);
// to make it more realistic, add mask in blend mode (does not work in IE):
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "multiply";
if (ctx.globalCompositeOperation === "multiply") {
ctx.drawImage(iMask, 0, 0);
}
}
<canvas width=281 height=340></canvas>
I don't understand how swiffy succefully antialias clipping mask when it exports a flash animation that contains mask.
Here is my exemple :
Full canvas, with mask. Super dirty in Chrome : http://goo.gl/n8yB5h
And a swiffy export where there is a picture that move inside a mask. Super clean on Chrome :
http://www.creaktif.com/lab/test4.html
I tried a lot of things, including draw a 200% canvas then scale it down, adding more points when I draw my mask, but no way to get a clean mask in my canvas.
How does swiffy ?
It just turn me crazy.
Thanks. :)
Instead of using clip() you can draw the clipping path into an off-screen canvas and use that as a "matte", or rather, an alpha mask.
Now you can use the mask with various composite modes to get anti-aliased edges. Draw in the background you want to clip, set a composite mode (operator) and draw in mask. Depending on operator you can cut out center or the surroundings (destination-in is typical equivalent to using clip() though).
Note: demo below is only useful in Chrome/Opera as Firefox/IE already apply anti-aliasing to the clip mask - here's a snapshot showing the difference:
var ctxC = document.getElementById("clip").getContext("2d");
var ctxM = document.getElementById("mask").getContext("2d");
var w = ctxC.canvas.width, h = ctxC.canvas.height;
var img = new Image();
img.onload = demo;
img.src = "http://i.imgur.com/s9ksOb1.jpg";
function demo() {
// define a clip path
ctxC.save();
createPath(ctxC);
ctxC.clip();
ctxC.drawImage(this, 0, 0, w, h);
ctxC.restore();
// create a "matte" / alpha mask
var matte = document.createElement("canvas"),
ctx = matte.getContext("2d");
matte.width = w;
matte.height = h;
// fill the path instead:
createPath(ctx);
ctx.fill(); // color doesn't matter, alpha does
// now use composition to "clip"
ctxM.drawImage(this, 0, 0, w, h); // draw image
ctxM.globalCompositeOperation = "destination-in"; // will keep bg where mask cover
ctxM.drawImage(matte, 0, 0);
ctxM.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over"; // default mode
// zoom some details:
zoom(ctxC);
zoom(ctxM);
}
function createPath(ctx) {
var r = 88;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(100 + r, 90);
ctx.arc(100,90,r, 0, 6.28);
}
function zoom(ctx) {
ctx.imageSmoothingEnabled =
ctx.webkitImageSmoothingEnabled =
ctx.mozImageSmoothingEnabled = false;
ctx.drawImage(ctx.canvas, 10, 10, 100, 100, 70,0, 400, 400);
}
html, body {margin:4px 0 0 4px;overflow:hidden}
canvas{background:#000;border:1px solid #000;margin:0 1px 0 0}
<canvas id="clip" height=180></canvas>
<canvas id="mask" height=180></canvas>
I'd like to give a sprite an outline when the character gets healed/damaged/whatever but I can't think of a way to code this using the 2d canvas. If it were possible, I'd think it would be a global composite operation, but I can't think of a way to achieve it with one of them.
I did find this stackoverflow answer that recommends creating a fatter, solid color version of the original and put the original on top of it. That would give it an outline, but it seems like a lot of extra work especially considering I'm using placeholder art. Is there an easier way?
This question is different from the one linked because this is specifically about the HTML5 2D canvas. It may have a solution not available to the other question.
For what it's worth, I don't mind if the outline creates a wider border or keeps the sprite the same size, I just want the outline look.
Just draw your original image in 8 position around the original image
Change composite mode to source-in and fill with the outline color
Change composite mode back to source-over and draw in the original image at correct location
This will create a clean sharp outline with equal border thickness on every side. It is not so suited for thick outlines however. Image drawing is fast, especially when image is not scaled so performance is not an issues unless you need to draw a bunch (which in that case you would cache the drawings or use a sprite-sheet anyways).
Example:
var ctx = canvas.getContext('2d'),
img = new Image;
img.onload = draw;
img.src = "http://i.stack.imgur.com/UFBxY.png";
function draw() {
var dArr = [-1,-1, 0,-1, 1,-1, -1,0, 1,0, -1,1, 0,1, 1,1], // offset array
s = 2, // scale
i = 0, // iterator
x = 5, // final position
y = 5;
// draw images at offsets from the array scaled by s
for(; i < dArr.length; i += 2)
ctx.drawImage(img, x + dArr[i]*s, y + dArr[i+1]*s);
// fill with color
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-in";
ctx.fillStyle = "red";
ctx.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width, canvas.height);
// draw original image in normal mode
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-over";
ctx.drawImage(img, x, y);
}
<canvas id=canvas width=500 height=500></canvas>
Maybe it would be worth trying this :
• build a canvas 1.1 time bigger than the original sprite
• fill it with the outline color
• draw the sprite scaled by 1.1 on the canvas using destination-in globalCompositeOperation.
Then you have a bigger 'shadow' of your sprite in the outline color.
When you want to draw the outline :
• draw the 'shadow' (centered)
• draw your sprite within the shadow.
Depending on the convexity of your sprite, this will work more or less nicely, but i think it's worth trying since it avoids you doubling the number of input graphic files.
I just did a short try as proof-of-concept and it quite works :
http://jsbin.com/dogoroxelupo/1/edit?js,output
Before :
After :
html
<html>
<body>
<image src='http://www.gifwave.com/media/463554/cartoons-comics-video-games-sprites-scott-pilgrim-paul-robertson_200s.gif' id='spr'></image>
<canvas id='cv' width = 500 height= 500 ></canvas>
</body>
</html>
code
window.onload=function() {
var spr = document.getElementById('spr');
var margin = 4;
var gh = createGhost(spr, '#F80', margin);
var cv = document.getElementById('cv');
var ctx = cv.getContext('2d');
var outlined = true;
setInterval(function() {
ctx.clearRect(0,0,cv.width, cv.height);
if (outlined)
ctx.drawImage(gh, 0, 0)
ctx.drawImage(spr, 0, 0)
outlined = !outlined;
}, 400);
}
function createGhost (img, color, margin) {
var cv= document.createElement('canvas');
cv.width = img.width+2*margin;
cv.height = img.height + 2*margin;
var ctx = cv.getContext('2d');
ctx.fillStyle = color;
ctx.fillRect(0,0, cv.width, cv.height);
ctx.save();
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = 'destination-in';
var scale = cv.width/spr.width;
ctx.scale(cv.width/spr.width, cv.height/spr.height);
ctx.drawImage(img, -margin, -margin);
ctx.restore();
return cv;
}
You could use strokeRect method to outline the sprite after drawing it. It should be asy if you know your sprite's dimensions...
i draw a canvas(aka canvas 1) with image() then rotate it 25 degree. then i take rotated canvas to make a pattern for another canvas(aka canvas 2). then i draw this . and fill the fillstyle with newly created pattern. i noticed if alert in the middle of below code
finalsleeve_ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-atop";
/*****************************************
alert(sleeve.toDataURL('image/png'));
*****************************************/
var pattern = finalsleeve_ctx.createPattern(sleeve, 'repeat');
then firefox gives a correct output but if i dont do alert it does not give me correct output. crome not showing me correct output.
do i need to delay ?
here is what i have tried.
HTML
<div >
<canvas id="sleeve" width=436 height=567></canvas>
<canvas id="finalsleeve" width=436 height=567 ></canvas>
</div>
JS
var sleeve = document.getElementById('sleeve');
var sleeve_ctx = sleeve.getContext('2d');
var finalsleeve = document.getElementById('finalsleeve');
var finalsleeve_ctx = finalsleeve.getContext('2d');
function rotator2(var2,var3)
{
sleeve.width=sleeve.width;
var imageObj_rotator2 = new Image();
imageObj_rotator2.onload = function ()
{
var pattern_rotator2 = sleeve_ctx.createPattern(imageObj_rotator2, "repeat");
sleeve_ctx.fillStyle = pattern_rotator2;
sleeve_ctx.rect(0, 0, sleeve.width, sleeve.height);
sleeve_ctx.rotate(var3 * Math.PI/180);
sleeve_ctx.fill();
}
imageObj_rotator2.src = var2;
}
function drawSleeve()
{
finalsleeve.width = finalsleeve.width;
var imgsleeve = new Image();
imgsleeve.src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/FoqGC.png";
finalsleeve_ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve,0,0);
finalsleeve_ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-atop";
alert(sleeve.toDataURL('image/png'));
var pattern = finalsleeve_ctx.createPattern(sleeve, 'repeat');
finalsleeve_ctx.rect(0, 0, sleeve.width, sleeve.height);
finalsleeve_ctx.fillStyle = pattern;
finalsleeve_ctx.fill();
finalsleeve_ctx.globalAlpha = .10;
finalsleeve_ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve, 0, 0);
finalsleeve_ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve, 0, 0);
finalsleeve_ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve, 0, 0);
}
rotator2('http://i.stack.imgur.com/fvpMN.png','25');
drawSleeve();
Here is fiddle.
http://jsfiddle.net/EbBHz/
EDITED
Sorry, I completely misunderstood your question. I just now went back and saw the last question you posted and the goal you are trying to achieve.
To get the functionality you desire you can just create one function, you don't need two. Instead of using a second canvas in the HTML I created a temporary one using javascript.
Here is the simplified and functional code
<canvas id="sleeve" width='436' height='567'></canvas>
var sleeve = document.getElementById('sleeve');
var ctx = sleeve.getContext('2d');
function rotator2(var2, var3) {
// Draw the original sleeves
var imageObj_rotator2 = new Image();
imageObj_rotator2.src = var2;
imageObj_rotator2.onload = function () {
var imgsleeve = new Image();
imgsleeve.src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/FoqGC.png";
ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve,0,0);
// Create a second temporary canvas
var pattern = document.createElement('canvas');
pattern.width = 500;
pattern.height = 500;
var pctx = pattern.getContext('2d');
// Make the pattern that fills the generated canvas
var pattern_rotator2 = pctx.createPattern(imageObj_rotator2, "repeat");
pctx.fillStyle = pattern_rotator2;
pctx.rotate(var3 * Math.PI / 180);
// Fill the generated canvas with the rotated image pattern we just created
pctx.fillRect(0, 0, pattern.width, pattern.height);
// Create a pattern of the generated canvas
var patterned = ctx.createPattern(pattern, "repeat");
// Fills in the non-transparent part of the image with whatever the
// pattern from the second canvas is
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-in";
ctx.fillStyle = patterned;
ctx.fillRect(0, 0, sleeve.width, sleeve.height);
}
}
rotator2('http://i.stack.imgur.com/fvpMN.png', '45')
The technique works alright, but only for certain angles. Here is the demo set to 45 degrees. As you can see, there is a problem: part of the sleeve is whited out. However, if you change the degree to 15 like this it works just fine. This is because when the image is being rotated in the created canvas it leaves white space before repeating. To see this issue first hand, change the width and the height of the created canvas to 30 (the default width/height of the image) like this
Note: You may have to click run once the jsfiddle tab is open, canvases don't like generating content when another tab is focused
I tried problem solving the issue including
Making the generated canvas really large (which works but KILLS load
time/crashes page sometimes)
Translating the picture in the generated canvas after rotating it
which didn't work like I had hoped
Coming up with a function to change the width/height to cover the
entire first canvas based on the rotated second-canvas-dimensions, which is by far the most promising, but I don't have the time or desire to work out a good solution
All that being said if the angle HAS to be dynamic you can work on a function for it. Otherwise just use a workaround angle/generated canvas dimensions
final result> Here is a working solution for fill rotated pattern without white at any angle
var sleeve = document.getElementById('sleeve');
var ctx = sleeve.getContext('2d');
function rotator2(var2, var3) {
var x =0;
var y=0;
//pattern size should be grater than height and width of object so that white space does't appear.
var patternSize = sleeve.width+ sleeve.height;
// Draw the original sleeves
var imageObj_rotator2 = new Image();
imageObj_rotator2.src = var2;
imageObj_rotator2.onload = function () {
var imgsleeve = new Image();
imgsleeve.src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/FoqGC.png";
ctx.drawImage(imgsleeve,0,0);
// Create a second temporary canvas
var pattern = document.createElement('canvas');
pattern.width = sleeve.width;
pattern.height = sleeve.height;
var pctx = pattern.getContext('2d');
// Make the pattern that fills the generated canvas
var pattern_rotator2 = pctx.createPattern(imageObj_rotator2, "repeat");
pctx.fillStyle = pattern_rotator2;
//moving rotation point to center of target object.
pctx.translate(x+ sleeve.width/2, y+sleeve.height/2);
pctx.rotate(var3 * Math.PI / 180);
// Fill the generated canvas with the rotated image pattern we just created and expanding size from center of rotated angle
pctx.fillRect(-patternSize/2, -patternSize/2, patternSize, patternSize);
// Create a pattern of the generated canvas
var patterned = ctx.createPattern(pattern, "no-repeat");
// Fills in the non-transparent part of the image with whatever the
// pattern from the second canvas is
ctx.globalCompositeOperation = "source-in";
ctx.fillStyle = patterned;
ctx.fillRect(x, y, sleeve.width, sleeve.height);
}
}
rotator2('http://i.stack.imgur.com/fvpMN.png', '50')