Problem!
While trying to perform a set of AJAX request, most of the time at least one of the request is always getting a pending response, this is resulting in a loop of requests until it gets a succesful response. Please note that I using jQuery.when, this way I can ensure that both requests have been executed.
The mentioned behaviour is resulting on:
Multiple requests to the same source
jQuery.always is executes as many times as requests performed
The interface is crashing due to multiple updates on it's DOM.
Example
var request = [];
request.push(getProductPrice().done(
function(price) {
updateProductPrice(price);
}
);
request.push(getProductInfo().done(
function(information) {
updateProductInformation(information);
}
);
jQuery.when.apply(undefined, request).always(function() {
doSomeStuff1();
doSomeStuff2();
...
...
...
doSomeStuffN();
});
function updateProductPrice(obj) {
return jQuery.get(...);
}
function updateProductInformation(obj) {
return jQuery.get(...);
}
Questions?
Is there any reason on why I am getting a pending response?
Is this problem realted to jQuery.when trying to release the AJAX request in order to fire-up the callbacks?
Facts
If I do the request to the mentioned sources via synchronous, I will never get a pending response. I am just trying to avoid the use of async: false.
Update #1
By pending status I meant the response given by the web browser to my request, which is nothing but the ajax call waiting for it's response. The main problem resides on how those AJAX request are being treated, I am noticing that the functions updateProdcutPrice() and updateProductInformation() are being called N times until the response from the server is succesful, this is resulting that the functions declared on the .always()'s callback for the requestes performed on updateProdcutPrice() and updateProductInformation() are also being called that many times.
Related
I'm trying to figure out if there's any chance to receive the status of completion of a task (triggered via an ajax call), via multiple (time intervalled) ajax calls.
Basically, during the execution of something that could take long, I want to populate some variable and return it's value when asked.
Server code looks like this:
function setTask($total,$current){
$this->task['total'] = $total;
$this->task['current'] = $current;
}
function setEmptyTask(){
$this->task = [];
}
function getTaskPercentage(){
return ($this->task['current'] * 100) / $this->task['total'];
}
function actionGetTask(){
if (Yii::$app->request->isAjax) {
\Yii::$app->response->format = \yii\web\Response::FORMAT_JSON;
return [
'percentage' => $this->getTaskPercentage(),
];
}
}
Let's say I'm in a for loop, and I know how many times I iterate over:
function actionExportAll(){
$size = sizeof($array);
$c = 0;
foreach($array as $a){
// do something that takes relatively long
$this->setTask($size,$c++);
}
}
While in the client side i have this:
function exportAll(){
var intervalId = setInterval(function(){
$.ajax({
url: '/get-task',
type: 'post',
success: function(data){
console.log(data);
}
});
},3000);
$.ajax({
url: '/export-all',
type: 'post',
success: function(data){
clearInterval(intervalId); // cancel setInterval
// ..
}
});
}
This looks like it could work, besides the fact that ajax calls done in the setInterval function are completed after "export-all" is done and goes in the success callback.
There's surely something that I'm missing in this logic.
Thanks
The problem is probably in sessions.
Let's take a look what is going on.
The request to /export-all is send by browser.
App on server calls session_start() that opens the session file and locks access to it.
The app begins the expensive operations.
In browser the set interval passes and browser send request to /get-task.
App on server tries to handle the /get-task request and calls session_start(). It is blocked and has to wait for /export-all request to finish.
The expensive operations of /export-all are finished and the response is send to browser.
The session file is unlocked and /get-task request can finally continue past session_start(). Meanwhile browser have recieved /export-all response and executes the success callback for it.
The /get-task request is finished and response is send to browser.
The browser recieves /get-task response and executes its success callback.
The best way to deal with it is avoid running the expensive tasks directly from requests executed by user's browser.
Your export-all action should only plan the task for execution. Then the task itself can be executed by some cron action or some worker in background. And the /get-task can check its progress and trigger the final actions when the task is finished.
You should take look at yiisoft/yii2-queue extension. This extension allows you to create jobs, enqueue them and run the jobs from queue by cron task or by running a daemon that will listen for tasks and execute them as they come.
Without trying to dive into your code, which I don't have time to do, I'll say that the essential process looks like this:
Your first AJAX call is "to schedule the unit of work ... somehow." The result of this call is to indicate success and to hand back some kind of nonce, or token, which uniquely identifies the request. This does not necessarily indicate that processing has begun, only that the request to start it has been accepted.
Your next calls request "progress," and provide the nonce given in step #1 as the means to refer to it. The immediate response is the status at this time.
Presumably, you also have some kind of call to retrieve (and remove) the completed request. The same nonce is once again used to refer to it. The immediate response is that the results are returned to you and the nonce is cancelled.
Obviously, you must have some client-side way to remember the nonce(s). "Sessions" are the most-common way to do that. "Local storage," in a suitably-recent web browser, can also be used.
Also note ... as an important clarification ... that the title to your post does not match what's happening: one AJAX call isn't happening "during" another AJAX call. All of the AJAX calls return immediately. But, all of them refer (by means of nonces) to a long-running unit of work that is being carried out by some other appropriate means.
(By the way, there are many existing "workflow managers" and "batch processing systems" out there, open-source on Github, Sourceforge, and other such places. Be sure that you're not re-inventing what someone else has already perfected! "Actum Ne Agas: Do Not Do A Thing Already Done." Take a few minutes to look around and see if there's something already out there that you can just steal.)
So basically I found the solution for this very problem by myself.
What you need to do is to replace the above server side's code into this:
function setTask($total,$current){
$_SESSION['task']['total'] = $total;
$_SESSION['task']['current'] = $current;
session_write_close();
}
function setEmptyTask(){
$_SESSION['task'] = [];
session_write_close();
}
function getTaskPercentage(){
return ($_SESSION['task']['current'] * 100) / $_SESSION['task']['total'];
}
function actionGetTask(){
if (Yii::$app->request->isAjax) {
\Yii::$app->response->format = \yii\web\Response::FORMAT_JSON;
return [
'percentage' => $this->getTaskPercentage(),
];
}
}
This works, but I'm not completely sure if is a good practice.
From what I can tell, it seems like it frees access to the $_SESSION variable and makes it readable by another session (ence my actionGetTask()) during the execution of the actionExportAll() session.
Maybe somebody could integrate this answer and tell more about it.
Thanks for the answers, I will certainly dig more in those approaches and maybe try to make this same task in a better, more elegant and logic way.
What im doing is when page is loading im calling two ajax request
fetch_list_big();
fetch_list_small();
function fetch_list_big(){
$.post(...);
}
function fetch_list_small(){
$.post(...);
}
As the name suggests request in fetch_list_big() takes more time to complete than fetch_list_small.
But since fetch_list_big is called first the fetch_list_small says pending till fetch_list_big returns 200.
big.php
require_once('files_same.php'); #starts session /connection / configurations etc
#Some heavy mysql stuff #say 5 seconds
echo json(...)
small.php
require_once('files_same.php'); #starts session /connection / configurations etc
#Some light mysql stuff #say 1 seconds
echo json(...)
How can i call fetch_list_small() after fetch_list_big() in parallel way and not make it pending ?
Pending Requests
http://i.imgur.com/vj07tyI.png
The first request is huge and takes 5 second in server
The last 3 are small request and should be returned before first one but they are pending.
After First request returns 200
http://i.imgur.com/liPuO70.png
After first request returns 200 . the last 3 requests are executed.
Problem
I want all the requests to Run Parallel without locking in server (is some kind of session is getting locked ? )
I want all the requests to Run Parallel without locking in server (is some kind of session is getting locked ? )
Yes; PHP will block other scripts from accessing the session, as long as one script instance is using it. (At least for the default file-based session storage mechanism.)
You can avoid this by calling session_write_close as soon as your script(s) are done with what they need to do with the session.
You can use a callback in your fetch_list_big()
function fetch_list_big(callback){
$.post(url, function(data){
if(callback){
callback();
}
});
}
fetch_list_big(function(){
fetch_list_small();
});
This question already has answers here:
Sequencing ajax requests
(10 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
I am working a script, I need to loop an array of AJAX requests:
$('#fetchPosts').click(function(){
for(var i=0; i < link_array.length; i++) {
settings = {
// some object not relevant
}
var status = main_ajaxCall(settings, i); // ajax call
}
});
function main_ajaxCall(settings, i) {
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "../model/insert.php",
data:{obj_settings: settings},
dataType: "json",
cache: false,
success: function (data) {
// some handeling here
return 0;
},
error: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus, errorThrown) {
return 1;
},
};
Why does the AJAX requests fire instantly? It does not seem to wait for a response from model/insert.php, is there any way to force it to wait for a response before firing the next AJAX request?
EDIT 1:
It seems I wasnt clear, sorry, I dont want it to wait, I want to queue up the calls.
I cant make the call in one request, this is impossible in my current situation.
Set async to false if you want to wait for a response (default: true)
$.ajax({
async: false,
...
http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/
If you do not want blocking, you can set a success handler function using .ajaxComplete(), and you have to keep track of active AJAX connections if you want to wait for all to complete - How to know when all ajax calls are complete
The best solution would be to minimize the number of AJAX requests to one. If you have to make a loop of AJAX requests, the logic could be simplified somewhere (put that in the server perhaps?)
EDIT 1: (In response to OP edit)
If you want to queue the AJAX requests, this question has been answered before here:
Sequencing ajax requests
Queue ajax requests using jQuery.queue()
You could also use these libraries (all you needed to do was Google):
https://code.google.com/p/jquery-ajaxq/
http://codecanyon.net/item/ajax-queue-jquery/full_screen_preview/4903957
http://schneimi.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/multiple-ajax-requests-problems-and-ajaxqueue-as-solution/
It fires instantly and doesn't wait around because that's what AJAX does best (The first A stands for asynchronous).
The request to a server could take a long time to respond, and in most cases, don't want user's browser's freezing up or stopping them from doing anything else. If you do, you could probably just use a normal request.
This is the reason you give it functions for success error, so it can call them when the server responds.
If you want nothing to be able to happen in the browser while you're calling insert.php, you could drop an overlay (eg. dark div) over everything with a loading image and remove it on success.
Maybe replace the $('#fetchPosts') element with "loading..." text and then reverse it when done. Hiding visibility of the fetchPosts element and adding a different "loading.." element is a nice way.
Your AJAX call will wait for a response from the server, but wil do so asynchronously. That is, your script will continue to execute rather than block the browser while the server responds. When the server responds (or when the request times out - usually several seconds) your success: or error: functions will then execute.
The effect of your code here is to create several concurrent requests based on the link_array length.
You could specify async:false in your AJAX call, but this would freeze the browser while all the AJAX calls are made.
You should rewrite your code to execute all the handling as part of your success: function. I'd recommend you rewrite your code to assemble all your request into one, and make one AJAX call rather than several, and have the server return all the responses as one block. I can't suggest exactly how you do that - it's implementation dependent.
EDITED:
In response to your clarification, if you want them to be called in order, you'll need the success function to call the next one. You'll then have a chain of success calls the next, whose success calls the next, whose success calls the next.. etc until the last one which does the final processing. One way would be to pass the call number to the success function.
We've all seen some examples in AJAX tutorials where some data is sent. They all (more or less) look like:
var http = createRequestObject(); // shared between printResult() and doAjax()
function createRequestObject() { /* if FF/Safari/Chrome/IE ... */ ... }
function printResult()
{
if (http.readyState == 4) { ... }
}
function doAjax() {
var request = 'SomeURL';
http.open('post', request);
http.onreadystatechange = printResult;
data = ...; // fill in the data
http.send(data);
}
// trigger doAjax() from HTML code, by pressing some button
Here is the scenario I don't understand completely: what if the button is being pressed several times very fast? Should doAjax() somehow re-initialize the http object? And if if the object is re-initialized, what happens with the requests that are being already on air?
PS: to moderator: this question is probably more community-wiki related. As stated here (https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/67581/community-wiki-checkbox-missing-in-action) - if I've got it right - please mark this question appropriately.
Since AJAX has asynchronus nature, with each button click you would raise async event that would GET/POST some data FROM/TO server. You provide one callback, so it would be triggered as many times as server finishes processing data.
It is normal behaviour by default, you should not reinitialize of http object. If you want to present multiple send operation you have to do that manually (e.g. disabling button as first call being made).
I also suggest to use jQuery $.ajax because it incapsulate many of these details.
Sure that numerous libraries exist nowadays that perform a decent job and should be used in production environment. However, my question was about the under-the-hood details. So here I've found the lamda-calculus-like way to have dedicated request objects per request. Those object will obviously be passed to the callback function which is called when response arrives etc:
function printResult(http) {
if (http.readyState == 4) { ... }
...
}
function doAjax() {
var http = createRequestObject();
var request = 'SomeURL';
http.open('get', request);
http.onreadystatechange = function() { printResult(http); };
http.send(null);
return false;
}
Successfully tested under Chrome and IE9.
I've used a per-page request queue to deal with this scenario (to suppress duplicate requests and to ensure the sequential order of requests), but there may be a more standardized solution.
Since this is not provided by default, you would need to implement it in JavaScript within your page (or a linked script). Instead of starting an Ajax request, clicking a button would add a request to a queue. If the queue is empty, execute the Ajax request, with a callback that removes the queued entry and executes the next (if any).
See also: How to implement an ajax request queue using jQuery
I have a php script that outputs json data. For the purposes of testing, i've put sleep(2) at the start.
I have a html page that requests that data when you click a button, and does $('.dataarea').append(data.html)
(php script returns a json encoded array. data.html has the html that i want to put at the end of <div class="dataarea">...HERE</div>.
The trouble is, if i click the button too fast (ie. more than once within two seconds (due to the sleep(2) in the php script)), it requests the php file again.
how can i make it only do one request at a time?
i've tried this (edited down to show the important parts):
amibusy=false;
$('#next').click('get_next');
function get_next() {
if (amibusy) {
alert('requesting already');
}
else {
amibusy=true;
// do the request, then do the append()
amibusy=false;
}
}
but this doesn't seem to work. i've even tried replacing the amibusy=true|false, with set_busy(), and set_not_busy(). (and made a function am_i_busy() { return amibusy; })
but none of this seems to work. what am i missing?
If you're in jQuery the amibusy would be jQuery.active which contains a count of currently active AJAX requests, like this:
if(jQuery.active > 0) { //or $.active
alert('Request in Progress');
}
Keep in mind that in jQuery 1.4.3 this becomes jQuery.ajax.active.
Disable the button in the click event and enable it again when the request is finished. Note that the request is asynchronous (i.e. "send request" returns immediately), so you must register a function that is called when the answer comes in.
In jQuery, see the load() function and the success method plus the various AJAX events which you can tap into with ajax().
I'm wondering about your "do request" logic. Whenever I've done calls like this they've always been asynchronous meaning I fire the request off and then when the response comes another function handles that. In this case it would finish going through that function after setting the callback handler and set your value of amibusy back to false again before the request actually comes back. You'd need to set that variable in the handler for your post callback.
Could you use the async variable?
http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.ajax/
asyncBoolean Default: true
By default, all requests are sent
asynchronous (i.e. this is set to true
by default). If you need synchronous
requests, set this option to false.
Cross-domain requests and dataType:
"jsonp" requests do not support
synchronous operation. Note that
synchronous requests may temporarily
lock the browser, disabling any
actions while the request is active.