Is there any way to guarantee sequence of id's in redshift? i.e every insertion is +1 from the max id.
From Examples - Amazon Redshift:
Create a table with an IDENTITY column
The following example creates a table named VENUE_IDENT, which has an IDENTITY column named VENUEID. This column starts with 0 and increments by 1 for each record. VENUEID is also declared as the primary key of the table.
create table venue_ident(
venueid bigint identity(0, 1),
venuename varchar(100),
venuecity varchar(30),
venuestate char(2),
venueseats integer,
primary key(venueid)
);
See also: Redshift - Identity column SEED-STEP with Insert statement
I'm having a bit of a strange problem. I'm trying to add a foreign key to one table that references another, but it is failing for some reason. With my limited knowledge of MySQL, the only thing that could possibly be suspect is that there is a foreign key on a different table referencing the one I am trying to reference.
I've done a SHOW CREATE TABLE query on both tables, sourcecodes_tags is the table with the foreign key, sourcecodes is the referenced table.
CREATE TABLE `sourcecodes` (
`id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`user_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`language_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`category_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`title` varchar(40) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
`description` text CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL,
`views` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`downloads` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`time_posted` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `user_id` (`user_id`),
KEY `language_id` (`language_id`),
KEY `category_id` (`category_id`),
CONSTRAINT `sourcecodes_ibfk_3` FOREIGN KEY (`language_id`) REFERENCES `languages` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
CONSTRAINT `sourcecodes_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`user_id`) REFERENCES `users` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE,
CONSTRAINT `sourcecodes_ibfk_2` FOREIGN KEY (`category_id`) REFERENCES `categories` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=4 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
CREATE TABLE `sourcecodes_tags` (
`sourcecode_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
`tag_id` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL,
KEY `sourcecode_id` (`sourcecode_id`),
KEY `tag_id` (`tag_id`),
CONSTRAINT `sourcecodes_tags_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`tag_id`) REFERENCES `tags` (`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
This is the code that generates the error:
ALTER TABLE sourcecodes_tags ADD FOREIGN KEY (sourcecode_id) REFERENCES sourcecodes (id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
Quite likely your sourcecodes_tags table contains sourcecode_id values that no longer exists in your sourcecodes table. You have to get rid of those first.
Here's a query that can find those IDs:
SELECT DISTINCT sourcecode_id FROM
sourcecodes_tags tags LEFT JOIN sourcecodes sc ON tags.sourcecode_id=sc.id
WHERE sc.id IS NULL;
I had the same issue with my MySQL database but finally, I got a solution which worked for me.
Since in my table everything was fine from the mysql point of view(both tables should use InnoDB engine and the datatype of each column should be of the same type which takes part in foreign key constraint).
The only thing that I did was to disable the foreign key check and later on enabled it after performing the foreign key operation.
Steps that I took:
SET foreign_key_checks = 0;
alter table tblUsedDestination add constraint f_operatorId foreign key(iOperatorId) references tblOperators (iOperatorId); Query
OK, 8 rows affected (0.23 sec) Records: 8 Duplicates: 0 Warnings: 0
SET foreign_key_checks = 1;
Use NOT IN to find where constraints are constraining:
SELECT column FROM table WHERE column NOT IN
(SELECT intended_foreign_key FROM another_table)
so, more specifically:
SELECT sourcecode_id FROM sourcecodes_tags WHERE sourcecode_id NOT IN
(SELECT id FROM sourcecodes)
EDIT: IN and NOT IN operators are known to be much faster than the JOIN operators, as well as much easier to construct, and repeat.
Truncate the tables and then try adding the FK Constraint.
I know this solution is a bit awkward but it does work 100%. But I agree that this is not an ideal solution to deal with problem, but I hope it helps.
For me, this problem was a little different and super easy to check and solve.
You must ensure BOTH of your tables are InnoDB. If one of the tables, namely the reference table is a MyISAM, the constraint will fail.
SHOW TABLE STATUS WHERE Name = 't1';
ALTER TABLE t1 ENGINE=InnoDB;
This also happens when setting a foreign key to parent.id to child.column if the child.column has a value of 0 already and no parent.id value is 0
You would need to ensure that each child.column is NULL or has value that exists in parent.id
And now that I read the statement nos wrote, that's what he is validating.
I had the same problem today. I tested for four things, some of them already mentioned here:
Are there any values in your child column that don't exist in the parent column (besides NULL, if the child column is nullable)
Do child and parent columns have the same datatype?
Is there an index on the parent column you are referencing? MySQL seems to require this for performance reasons (http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.5/en/create-table-foreign-keys.html)
And this one solved it for me: Do both tables have identical collation?
I had one table in UTF-8 and the other in iso-something. That didn't work. After changing the iso-table to UTF-8 collation the constraints could be added without problems. In my case, phpMyAdmin didn't even show the child table in iso-encoding in the dropdown for creating the foreign key constraint.
It seems there is some invalid value for the column line 0 that is not a valid foreign key so MySQL cannot set a foreign key constraint for it.
You can follow these steps:
Drop the column which you have tried to set FK constraint for.
Add it again and set its default value as NULL.
Try to set a foreign key constraint for it again.
I'd the same problem, I checked rows of my tables and found there was some incompatibility with the value of fields that I wanted to define a foreign key. I corrected those value, tried again and the problem was solved.
I end up delete all the data in my table, and run alter again. It works. Not the brilliant one, but it save a lot time, especially your application is still in development stage without any customer data.
try this
SET foreign_key_checks = 0;
ALTER TABLE sourcecodes_tags ADD FOREIGN KEY (sourcecode_id) REFERENCES sourcecodes (id) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE
SET foreign_key_checks = 1;
I had this exact same problem about three different times. In each instance it was because one (or more) of my records did not conform to the new foreign key. You may want to update your existing records to follow the syntax constraints of the foreign key before trying to add the key itself. The following example should generally isolate the problem records:
SELECT * FROM (tablename)
WHERE (candidate key) <> (proposed foreign key value)
AND (candidate key) <> (next proposed foreign key value)
repeat AND (candidate key) <> (next proposed foreign key value) within your query for each value in the foreign key.
If you have a ton of records this can be difficult, but if your table is reasonably small it shouldn't take too long. I'm not super amazing in SQL syntax, but this has always isolated the issue for me.
Empty both your tables' data and run the command. It will work.
I was getting this error when using Laravel and eloquent, trying to make a foreign key link would cause a 1452. The problem was lack of data in the linked table.
Please see here for an example: http://mstd.eu/index.php/2016/12/02/laravel-eloquent-integrity-constraint-violation-1452-foreign-key-constraint/
You just need to answer one question:
Is your table already storing data? (Especially the table included foreign key.)
If the answer is yes, then the only thing you need to do is to delete all the records, then you are free to add any foreign key to your table.
Delete instruction: From child(which include foreign key table) to parent table.
The reason you cannot add in foreign key after data entries is due to the table inconsistency, how are you going to deal with a new foreign key on the former data-filled the table?
If the answer is no, then follow other instructions.
I was readying this solutions and this example may help.
My database have two tables (email and credit_card) with primary keys for their IDs. Another table (client) refers to this tables IDs as foreign keys. I have a reason to have the email apart from the client data.
First I insert the row data for the referenced tables (email, credit_card) then you get the ID for each, those IDs are needed in the third table (client).
If you don't insert first the rows in the referenced tables, MySQL wont be able to make the correspondences when you insert a new row in the third table that reference the foreign keys.
If you first insert the referenced rows for the referenced tables, then the row that refers to foreign keys, no error occurs.
Hope this helps.
Make sure the value is in the other table otherwise you will get this error, in the assigned corresponding column.
So if it is assigned column is assigned to a row id of another table , make sure there is a row that is in the table otherwise this error will appear.
you can try this exapmple
START TRANSACTION;
SET foreign_key_checks = 0;
ALTER TABLE `job_definers` ADD CONSTRAINT `job_cities_foreign` FOREIGN KEY
(`job_cities`) REFERENCES `drop_down_lists`(`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE;
SET foreign_key_checks = 1;
COMMIT;
Note : if you are using phpmyadmin just uncheck Enable foreign key checks
as example
hope this soloution fix your problem :)
UPDATE sourcecodes_tags
SET sourcecode_id = NULL
WHERE sourcecode_id NOT IN (
SELECT id FROM sourcecodes);
should help to get rid of those IDs. Or if null is not allowed in sourcecode_id, then remove those rows or add those missing values to the sourcecodes table.
I had the same problem and found solution, placing NULL instead of NOT NULL on foreign key column. Here is a query:
ALTER TABLE `db`.`table1`
ADD COLUMN `col_table2_fk` INT UNSIGNED NULL,
ADD INDEX `col_table2_fk_idx` (`col_table2_fk` ASC),
ADD CONSTRAINT `col_table2_fk1`
FOREIGN KEY (`col_table2_fk`)
REFERENCES `db`.`table2` (`table2_id`)
ON DELETE NO ACTION
ON UPDATE NO ACTION;
MySQL has executed this query!
In my case, I created a new table with the same structure, created the relationships with the other tables, then extracted the data in CSV from the old table that has the problem, then imported the CSV to the new table and disabled foreign key checking and disabled import interruption, all my data are inserted to the new table that has no problem successfully, then deleted the old table.
It worked for me.
This question already has answers here:
Is storing a delimited list in a database column really that bad?
(10 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
or better, is this good practice?
I would like to store bookmarks, each bookmark a row. I want a tag column that is an array in string format that hold the hierarchy of tags that define it. For example:
url | tag
'stackoverflow.com', '[faves, internet, QandA]'
My current table is below, and I just want to modify the tag column to hold the array in string form.
No, it's not usually a good idea to store a comma-separated list in a string.
Exception: if your queries always treat the whole string as a string, and you have no need to use SQL expressions to search for individual elements, then there's no harm in doing this.
In SQL, it's better to treat each column as a single scalar value, not an array. Working with data gets awkward and inefficient if you treat a column as something that can be broken down into sub-parts.
For your tags, you should have a one-to-many tag table so that each bookmark can be referenced by many tags, one per row in the tag table.
Or really, a lookup table of tags, then a many-to-many table mapping bookmarks to their tags.
CREATE TABLE Tag (
tag_id INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
tag VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL
);
CREATE TABLE BookmarkTag (
bookmark_id INT NOT NULL,
tag_id INT NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (bookmark_id, tag_id),
FOREIGN KEY (bookmark_id) REFERENCES Bookmark(bookmark_id),
FOREIGN KEY (tag_id) REFERENCES Tag(tag_id)
);
This gives you a lot more flexibility, for example:
No limit to the number of tags per bookmark
Easy to search for a specific tag
Easy to count how many tags per bookmark
Easy to prevent duplicates, control the tags allowed, delete a given tag from every bookmark that uses it, etc.
See also my answer to Is storing a delimited list in a database column really that bad?
I have a table called benificiaries with following columns
custid varchar
accno varchar primarykey
name varchar
I have one record in that table with values
101
12345
john
Now I need to insert a record for another custid but same accno
var data={"custid":"102","accno":"12345","name":"john"};
con.query('insert into benificiaries set ?',data)
But it is not allowing since accno is primary key..So how can i insert this?I can have same accountno once for different custid..Any ideas?
Check out your MySQL code here:
CREATE TABLE beneficiaries (
custid INT PRIMARY KEY,
accno INT,
name varchar(30)
);
Set custid as primary keys and observe the datatypes I've used for each column.
That is not possible, you have make accno and custid as composite key
You simply can't do this, because you've defined accno as primary key.
Primary key is exactly that - the primary key of the record. It is a unique value that positively identifies that record and only that record. If you can't guarantee that data to be unique per record, it cannot be your primary key.
This table seems like a mapping table, to me. Is it?
If so, it really doesn't need a primary key. If you absolutely MUST give it a primary key, for some reason, then just give the table a surrogate key using an autoincrementing integer column and make that the primary key for this table.
How is this table being used?
I'd say screw a primary key and just index on both accno and custid columns (if you do lookups by each).
If the combination of accno and custid is unique (probably is, given what this table seems to be), then you can define your primary key as a combination of accno and custid.
If, for some reason, you need to be able to have more than one record with the same values for both of those fields, then you have no natural key in this table anyway.
Because there can be multiple entries with the same accno, accno isn't a primary key. Make a compound primary key from accno and custid, and you should be set.
CREATE TABLE beneficiaries (
custid INT,
accno INT,
name varchar
PRIMARY KEY (custid, accno)
)
Recently i came across one problem of finding N Level Child from tables.
Let say we have following list of tables:
Table: **Country**
PKCountryID
CountryCode
CountryName
Table: **State**
PKStateID
FKCountryID
StateCode
StateName
Table: **Area**
PKAreaID
FKStateID
AreaCode
AreaName
Table: **Customer**
PKCustomerID
FKAreaID
CustomerCode
CustomerName and so on....
Here we need to find a way by which we can get N level Treeview with All Columns
Just Like
>Country
Country Table Column
Foreign Key Column of Country Table(Here : FKStateID)
>State
State Table Column
Foreign Key Column of State Table
and so on till N Level.
Is there any solution?
You can basically create the hierarchy using a CTE. If you build hte CTE properly, it will load as many levels as you need. However, I've built these before and you must be very careful in writing the code and how you write it or else performance may suffer.
Do try to use CTE to grab the information and determine if that will fit your need.