I want to create several entries in a loop using waterline ORM.
Each created object is pushed in an array.
After all objects are created, I need to return the full Array.
Here is my code :
share: function(req, res, next) {
var params = {},
id = req.param('id'),
img = {},
targets;
if (!req.param('name')) {
res.status(400);
return res.json('Error.No.Name')
}
var promiseLoop = function(Tree) { // Function called after creating or finding Tree to attach to
var array = [];
if(!req.param('targets')) return Tree; // No targets provided => exit
targets = JSON.parse(req.param('targets'));
_.each(targets, function(target) {
params = {
target : target,
image: Tree.id,
message : req.param('message')
};
Leaf
.create(params)
.then(function(Leaf) {
array.push(Leaf);
});
});
Tree.array = array;
return Tree;
}
if (!id) {
params.owner = req.session.user ;
params.name = req.param('name');
Tree
.create(params)
.then(function(Tree) {
res.status(201); // Status for image creation
return Tree;
})
.then(promiseLoop)
.then(function(data) { res.status(201); res.json(data);})
.catch(function(err) { res.status(400); res.json(err);});
}
}
};
I want the Tree return to have a array member equal to an array of created Leaves.
But of course the part
Tree.array = array;
return Tree;
is executed befure array is populated.
and what I get in response is my Tree object :
{
...,
"array": []
}
What wan I do to be sure to execute this part only after all objects are created ?
Thank you by advance.
Promises know when a previous promise is done through then chaining. You can and should utilize that.
Return a promise from promiseLoop:
var promiseLoop = function(Tree) { // are you sure about that naming?
if(!req.param('targets')) return Tree;
targets = JSON.parse(req.param('targets'));
var leaves = targets.map(function(target){
return Leaf.create({ // map each target to a leaf
target : target,
image: Tree.id,
message : req.param('message')
});
});
return Promise.all(leaves).then(function(leaves){
Tree.array = leaves; // assign to tree
}).return(Tree); // finally resolve the promise with it
}
Related
I have a function (that contains promises internally so it itself runs synchronously) that seems to be running asynchronously within my main code. No matter how I format my promise it seems like the resolve gets sent before the functions ends execution:
This problem is also logically recursive, in that if I try adding another promise around the nameExists function (within this very promise) and then putting the resolve in a 'then', i just run into the same issue with the nested resolve...
document.getElementById("config-select").addEventListener("input", function(){
//check if the doc name exists: returns doc id
//promise that doc_obj is created before moving on
let doc_obj = {};
let promise = new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
let doc_name = document.getElementById("config-select").value;
doc_obj = nameExists(doc_name);
resolve('done'); //this executes BEFORE nameExists is done processing...bringing back the original asynch issue i was trying to fix in the first place...
});
promise.then(function (result) {
alert("then: "+doc_obj);
if(doc_obj.bool === true){//it does exist:
alert("replacing id");
document.getElementById("config-select").setAttribute("doc-id", doc_obj.id);
}
else{//it doesn't:
alert("resetting id");
document.getElementById("config-select").setAttribute("doc-id", "");
}
}
);
});
The nameExists function:
//check if the name in config-select is an existing doc (assumes name is a unique document field)
const nameExists = function(name){
//get all docs
localDB.allDocs({include_docs: true}).then(function (result) {
//return object set to default state if no match is found
let doc_obj = {bool: false, id: ""};
alert("Entering the match checker...");
for(let i =0; i<result.total_rows; i++) {
if(result.rows[i].doc.name == name){
alert(result.rows[i].doc.name);
alert(name);
doc_obj.bool = true;
doc_obj.id = result.rows[i].doc._id;
//found a match
break;
}
}
//return the result
alert("returned obj.id: "+doc_obj.bool);
return doc_obj;
}).catch(function (err) {console.log(err);});
};
Ideally, I would like the doc_obj or some return value object to be populated with data from the nameExists function, before evaluating my 'if statements'. How can I format my promise/resolve statement to achieve this?
You should drop that new Promise - it doesn't change anything about whether you will be able to wait for nameExists' result or not. You will need to return the promise that then() creates inside the nameExists function:
function nameExists(name) {
return localDB.allDocs({include_docs: true}).then(function (result) {
//^^^^^^
for (let i =0; i<result.total_rows; i++) {
if (result.rows[i].doc.name == name){
return {bool: true, id: result.rows[i].doc._id};
}
}
return {bool: false, id: ""};
});
// ^ don't catch errors here if you cannot handle them and provide a fallback result
}
Then you can just wait for it in your event listener:
document.getElementById("config-select").addEventListener("input", function() {
const doc_select = document.getElementById("config-select");
const doc_name = doc_select.value;
// check if the doc name exists: returns doc id
nameExists(doc_name).then(function(doc_obj) {
//^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
console.log("then", doc_obj);
if (doc_obj.bool) { // it does exist:
alert("replacing id");
} else { // it doesn't:
alert("resetting id");
}
doc_select.setAttribute("doc-id", doc_obj.id); // id is "" when it doesn't exist
}).catch(function (err) {
console.log(err);
})
});
the only async call you have is inside the nameExists function which is the database call so there is no need to write two promises, only one is enough to solve your issue.
the first event should be like that:
document.getElementById("config-select").addEventListener("input", function(){
nameExists(doc_name).then(function(doc_obj) {
alert("then: "+doc_obj);
if(doc_obj.bool === true){//it does exist:
alert("replacing id");
document.getElementById("config-select").setAttribute("doc-id", doc_obj.id);
}
else{//it doesn't:
alert("resetting id");
document.getElementById("config-select").setAttribute("doc-id", "");
}
}).catch(function (err) { console.log(err) });
});
and the nameExists function should look like that:
//check if the name in config-select is an existing doc (assumes name is a unique document field)
const nameExists = function(name){
//get all docs
return localDB.allDocs({include_docs: true}).then(function (result) {
//return object set to default state if no match is found
let doc_obj = {bool: false, id: ""};
alert("Entering the match checker...");
for(let i =0; i<result.total_rows; i++) {
if(result.rows[i].doc.name == name){
alert(result.rows[i].doc.name);
alert(name);
doc_obj.bool = true;
doc_obj.id = result.rows[i].doc._id;
//found a match
break;
}
}
//return the result
alert("returned obj.id: "+doc_obj.bool);
return(doc_obj); // here is where the code runs then statement inside the event
});
};
How can I append the object that is pushed into the array, when using a function in the push method of the array (I hope I am wording it correctly)?
I have the following method that finds a match between a profile.id and a keywordId, and then pushes the matching kewordId into an array. How can I append this push method to return a modified object and not only the keywordId?
I would like to have the following pushed into the array:
array.push({ id: profile.id, keyID: keywordID, name: profile.name });
But I am not sure how to append this line to enable this:
array.push(findKeywordProfile(profile.id));
This is my method that creates the array:
function getKeywordProfiles(brandProfilesArray) {
var array = [];
brandProfilesArray.forEach(function (profile) {
array.push(findKeywordProfile(profile.id));
})
return $q.all(array);
}
This is the method called during the array.push function:
function findKeywordProfile(brandProfileID) {
var keywordProfileID = $q.defer();
pullSocialMediaData('list_keyword_profiles.json').then(function (data) {
var keywordProfileInstance = data.filter(function (keyword) {
return keyword.brand_profile_id === brandProfileID;
});
keywordProfileID.resolve(keywordProfileInstance[0].id);
});
return keywordProfileID.promise;
}
Thank you!
You should pass the entire object in your function keywordProfileID
Something like,
```
function findKeywordProfile(brandProfileID) {
var keywordProfileID = $q.defer();
pullSocialMediaData('list_keyword_profiles.json').then(function (data) {
var keywordProfileInstance = data.filter(function (keyword) {
return keyword.brand_profile_id === brandProfileID;
});
keywordProfileID.resolve({id: keywordProfileInstance[0].id, name: keywordProfileInstance[0].id, keyID: keyword});
});
return keywordProfileID.promise;
}
```
You can create an object from properties of keywordProfileInstance[0], pass the object to resolve()
let {id, keywordID, name} = keywordProfileInstance[0];
keywordProfileID.resolve({id, keyID:keywordID, name});
you should try this. hope it will work
function getKeywordProfiles(brandProfilesArray) {
var array = [];
brandProfilesArray.forEach(function (profile) {
var data = findKeywordProfile(profile.id);
array.push(data);
})
return $q.all(array);
}
I'm having trouble figuring out why my data is not being push into my new array, "results". newArr[0].mscd.g[i] is a list of several objects.
var axios = require('axios');
var moment = require('moment');
var _ = require('lodash');
var getData = function() {
return getNBASchedule().then(function(payload) {
return filterByMonth('January', payload);
}).then(function(result) {
return result
});
}
....
getData grabs the data from baseURL and returns a list of objects.
var getMonthlySchedule = function(data){
var results = [];
var newArr = data.slice(0, data.length);
for (var i = 0; i <= newArr[0].mscd.g.length; i++) {
if (newArr[0].mscd.g[i].v.tid === 1610612744 || newArr[0].mscd.g[i].h.tid === 1610612744) {
results.push(newArr[0].mscd.g[i]); <---- //does not seem to work
// however if I were to console.log(newArr[0].mscd.g[i],
// I would see the list of objects)
}
}
return results; <-- //when i console at this point here, it is blank
};
var getSchedule = function () {
return getData().then(function(pl) {
return getMonthlySchedule(pl)
})
};
var monthlyResults = function() {
return getSchedule().then(function(r) {
console.log("result", r)
return r
});
};
monthlyResults();
You don't know when getSchedule() is done unless you use a .then() handler on it.
getSchedule().then(function(data) {
// in here results are valid
});
// here results are not yet valid
You are probably trying to look at your higher scoped results BEFORE the async operation has finished. You HAVE to use .then() so you know when the operation is done and the data is valid.
Your code should simplify as follows :
var getData = function() {
return getNBASchedule().then(function(payload) {
return filterByMonth('January', payload);
});
}
var getMonthlySchedule = function(data) {
return data[0].mscd.g.filter(function(item) {
return item.v.tid === 1610612744 || item.h.tid === 1610612744;
});
};
var monthlyResults = function() {
return getData()
.then(getMonthlySchedule)
.then(function(r) {
console.log('result', r);
return r;
});
};
monthlyResults();
This may fix the problem. If not, then :
Check the filter test. Maybe those .tid properties are String, not Number?
Check that data[0].mscd.g is the right thing to filter.
I am trying to create an AngularJS factory that maintains a collection of resources automatically by retrieving the initial items from the API and then listening for socket updates to keep the collection current.
angular.module("myApp").factory("myRESTFactory", function (Resource, Socket, ErrorHandler, Confirm, $mdToast, $q, $rootScope) {
var Factory = {};
// Resource is the ngResource that fetches from the API
// Factory.collection is where we'll store the items
Factory.collection = Resource.query();
// manually add something to the collection
Factory.push = function(item) {
Factory.collection.push(item);
};
// search the collection for matching objects
Factory.find = function(opts) {
return $q(function(resolve, reject) {
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(collection){
resolve(_.where(Factory.collection, opts || {}));
});
});
};
// search the collection for a matching object
Factory.findOne = function(opts) {
return $q(function(resolve, reject) {
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(collection){
var item = _.findWhere(collection, opts || {});
idx = _.findIndex(Factory.collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
resolve(Factory.collection[idx]);
});
});
};
// create a new item; save to API & collection
Factory.create = function(opts) {
return $q(function(resolve, reject) {
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(collection){
Resource.save(opts).$promise.then(function(item){
Factory.collection.push(item);
resolve(item);
});
});
});
};
Factory.update = function(item) {
return $q(function(resolve, reject) {
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(collection){
Resource.update({_id: item._id}, item).$promise.then(function(item) {
var idx = _.findIndex(collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
Factory.collection[idx] = item;
resolve(item);
});
});
});
};
Factory.delete = function(item) {
return $q(function(resolve, reject) {
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(collection){
Resource.delete({_id: item._id}, item).$promise.then(function(item) {
var idx = _.findIndex(collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
Factory.collection.splice(idx, 1);
resolve(item);
});
});
});
};
// new items received from the wire
Socket.on('new', function(item){
idx = _.findIndex(Factory.collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
if(idx===-1) Factory.collection.push(item);
// this doesn't help
$rootScope.$apply();
});
Socket.on('update', function(item) {
idx = _.findIndex(Factory.collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
Factory.collection[idx] = item;
// this doesn't help
$rootScope.$apply();
});
Socket.on('delete', function(item) {
idx = _.findIndex(Factory.collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
if(idx!==-1) Factory.collection.splice(idx, 1);
});
return Factory;
});
My backend is solid and the socket messages come through correctly. However, the controllers don't respond to updates to the collection if any of the Factory methods are used.
i.e.
This works (responds to socket updates to the collection):
$scope.users = User.collection;
This does not work (it loads the user initially but is not aware of updates to the collection):
User.findOne({ _id: $routeParams.user_id }).then(function(user){
$scope.user = user;
});
How can I get my controllers to respond to update to changes to the collection?
Update:
I was able to implement a workaround in the controller by changing this:
if($routeParams.user_id) {
User.findOne({ _id: $routeParams.user_id }).then(function(user){
$scope.user = user;
});
}
To this:
$scope.$watchCollection('users', function() {
if($routeParams.user_id) {
User.findOne({ _id: $routeParams.user_id }).then(function(user){
$scope.user = user;
});
}
});
However, nobody likes workarounds, especially when it involves redundant code in your controllers. I am adding a bounty to the question for the person who can solve this inside the Factory.
The solution is for the factory methods to return an empty object/array to be populated later (similar to the way ngResource works). Then attach the socket listeners to both those return objects/arrays and the main Factory.collection array.
angular.module("myApp").factory("myRESTFactory",
function (Resource, Socket, ErrorHandler, Confirm, $mdToast, $q) {
var Factory = {};
// Resource is the ngResource that fetches from the API
// Factory.collection is where we'll store the items
Factory.collection = Resource.query();
// This function attaches socket listeners to given array
// or object and automatically updates it based on updates
// from the websocket
var socketify = function(thing, opts){
// if attaching to array
// i.e. myRESTFactory.find({name: "John"})
// was used, returning an array
if(angular.isArray(thing)) {
Socket.on('new', function(item){
// push the object to the array only if it
// matches the query object
var matches = $filter('find')([item], opts);
if(matches.length){
var idx = _.findIndex(thing, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
if(idx===-1) thing.push(item);
}
});
Socket.on('update', function(item) {
var idx = _.findIndex(thing, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
var matches = $filter('find')([item], opts);
// if the object matches the query obj,
if(matches.length){
// and is already in the array
if(idx > -1){
// then update it
thing[idx] = item;
// otherwise
} else {
// add it to the array
thing.push(item);
}
// if the object doesn't match the query
// object anymore,
} else {
// and is currently in the array
if(idx > -1){
// then splice it out
thing.splice(idx, 1);
}
}
});
Socket.on('delete', function(item) {
...
});
// if attaching to object
// i.e. myRESTFactory.findOne({name: "John"})
// was used, returning an object
} else if (angular.isObject(thing)) {
Socket.on('update', function(item) {
...
});
Socket.on('delete', function(item) {
...
});
}
// attach the socket listeners to the factory
// collection so it is automatically maintained
// by updates from socket.io
socketify(Factory.collection);
// return an array of results that match
// the query object, opts
Factory.find = function(opts) {
// an empty array to hold matching results
var results = [];
// once the API responds,
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(){
// see which items match
var matches = $filter('find')(Factory.collection, opts);
// and add them to the results array
for(var i = matches.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
results.push(matches[i]);
}
});
// attach socket listeners to the results
// array so that it is automatically maintained
socketify(results, opts);
// return results now. initially it is empty, but
// it will be populated with the matches once
// the api responds, as well as pushed, spliced,
// and updated since we socketified it
return results;
};
Factory.findOne = function(opts) {
var result = {};
Factory.collection.$promise.then(function(){
result = _.extend(result, $filter('findOne')(Factory.collection, opts));
});
socketify(result);
return result;
};
...
return Factory;
};
The reason this is so so great is that your controllers can be ridiculously simple yet powerful at the same time. For example,
$scope.users = User.find();
This returns an array of ALL users that you can use in your view; in an ng-repeat or something else. It will automatically be updated/spliced/pushed by updates from the socket and you don't need to do anything extra to get that. But wait, there's more.
$scope.users = User.find({status: "active"});
This will return an array of all active users. That array will also automatically be managed and filtered by our socketify function. So if a user is updated from "active" to "inactive", he is automatically spliced from the array. The inverse is also true; a user that gets updated from "inactive" to "active" is automatically added to the array.
The same is true for the other methods as well.
$scope.user = User.findOne({firstname: "Jon"});
If Jon's email changes, the object in the controller is updated. If his firstname changes to "Jonathan", $scope.user becomes an empty object. Better UX would be to do soft-delete or just mark the user deleted somehow, but that can be added later.
No $watch, $watchCollection, $digest, $broadcast, required--it just works.
Don't expose the collection property on Factory, keep it as a local variable.
Create a new exposed getter/setter on the Factory that proxies to and from the local variable.
Use the getter/setter Object internally in your find methods.
Something like this:
// internal variable
var collection = Resource.query();
// exposed 'proxy' object
Object.defineProperty(Factory, 'collection', {
get: function () {
return collection;
},
set: function (item) {
// If we got a finite Integer.
if (_.isFinite(item)) {
collection.splice(item, 1);
}
// Check if the given item is already in the collection.
var idx = _.findIndex(Factory.collection, function(u) {
return u._id === item._id;
});
if (idx) {
// Update the item in the collection.
collection[idx] = item;
} else {
// Push the new item to the collection.
collection.push(item);
}
// Trigger the $digest cycle as a last step after modifying the collection.
// Can safely be moved to Socket listeners so as to not trigger unnecessary $digests from an angular function.
$rootScope.$digest();
}
});
/**
* Change all calls from 'Factory.collection.push(item)' to
* 'Factory.collection = item;'
*
* Change all calls from 'Factory.collection[idx] = item' to
* 'Factory.collection = item;'
*
* Change all calls from 'Factory.collection.splice(idx, 1) to
* 'Factory.collection = idx;'
*
*/
Now, seeing as how the non angular parties modify your collection (namely Sockets in this case), you will need to trigger a $digest cycle to reflect the new state of the collection.
If you are only ever interested in keeping the collection in sync in a single $scope (or multiple ones, but not cross-scope) I would attach said $scope's to the factory, and run the $digest there instead of $rootScope. That will save you a little bit of performance down the line.
here's a jsbin showcasing how the usage of an Object.getter will keep your collection in sync and allow you to find items recently added to the collection.
I've opted for setTimeout in the jsbin so as to not trigger automatic $digests through the usage of $interval.
Obviously the jsbin is very barebones; There's no promises being shuffled around, no socket connections. I only wanted to showcase how you can keep things in sync.
I will admit that Factory.collection = value looks whack, but you could hide that away with the help of wrapping functions to make it more pretty / read better.
I want to send a list of new books to a user. So far the below code works fine. The problem is that I don't want to send a book multiple times, so I want to filter them.
Current code works fine:
function checkActiveBooks(books) {
var queue = _(books).map(function(book) {
var deferred = Q.defer();
// Get all alerts on given keywords
request('http://localhost:5000/books?l=0&q=' + book.name, function(error, response, body) {
if (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
}
var books = JSON.parse(body);
if (!_.isEmpty(books)) {
// Loop through users of current book.
var userBooks = _(book.users).map(function(user) {
// Save object for this user with name and deals.
return {
user: user,
book: book.name,
books: books
}
});
if (_.isEmpty(userBooks)) {
deferred.resolve(null);
} else {
deferred.resolve(userBooks);
}
} else {
deferred.resolve(null);
}
});
return deferred.promise;
});
return Q.all(queue);
}
But now I want to filter already sent books:
function checkActiveBooks(books) {
var queue = _(books).map(function(book) {
var deferred = Q.defer();
// Get all alerts on given keywords
request('http://localhost:5000/books?l=0&q=' + book.name, function(error, response, body) {
if (error) {
deferred.reject(error);
}
var books = JSON.parse(body);
if (!_.isEmpty(books)) {
// Loop through users of current book.
var userBooks = _(book.users).map(function(user) {
var defer = Q.defer();
var userBook = user.userBook.dataValues;
// Check per given UserBook which books are already sent to the user by mail
checkSentBooks(userBook).then(function(sentBooks) {
// Filter books which are already sent.
var leftBooks = _.reject(books, function(obj) {
return sentBooks.indexOf(obj.id) > -1;
});
// Save object for this user with name and deals.
var result = {
user: user,
book: book.name,
books: leftBooks
}
return deferred.resolve(result);
});
return Q.all(userBooks);
} else {
deferred.resolve(null);
}
});
return deferred.promise;
});
return Q.all(queue);
}
But above code doesn't work. It doesn't stop looping. I thought it made sense to use q.all twice, because it contains two loops. But I guess I'm doing it wrong...
First of all you should always promisify at the lowest level. You're complicating things here and have multiple deferreds. Generally you should only have deferreds when converting an API to promises. Promises chain and compose so let's do that :)
var request = Q.nfbind(require("request")); // a promised version.
This can make your code in the top section become:
function checkActiveBooks(books) {
return Q.all(books.map(function(book){
return request('http://.../books?l=0&q=' + book.name)
.get(1) // body
.then(JSON.parse) // parse body as json
.then(function(book){
if(_.isEmpty(book.users)) return null;
return book.users.map(function(user){
return {user: user, book: book.name, books: books };
});
});
});
}
Which is a lot more elegant in my opinion.
Now, if we want to filter them by a predicate we can do:
function checkActiveBooksThatWereNotSent(books) {
return checkActiveBooks(books).then(function(books){
return books.filter(function(book){
return checkSentBooks(book.book);
});
});
}
It's worth mentioning that the Bluebird library has utility methods for all this like Promise#filter and Promise#map that'd make this code shorter.
Note that if checkSentBook is asynchronous you'd need to modify the code slightly:
function checkActiveBooksThatWereNotSent(books) {
return checkActiveBooks(books).then(function(books){
return Q.all(books.map(function(book){ // note the Q.all
return Q.all([book, checkSentBooks(book.book)]);
})).then(function(results){
return results.filter(function(x){ return x[1]; })
.map(function(x){ return x[0]; });
});
});
}
Like I said, with different libraries this would look a lot nicer. Here is how the code would look like in Bluebird which is also two orders of magnitude faster and has good stack traces and detection of unhandled rejections. For fun and glory I threw in ES6 arrows and shorthand properties:
var request = Promise.promisify(require("request"));
var checkActiveBooks = (books) =>
Promise.
map(books, book => request("...&q=" + book.name).get(1)).
map(JSON.parse).
map(book => book.users.length ?
book.users.map(user => {user, books, book: book.name) : null))
var checkActiveBooksThatWereNotSent = (books) =>
checkActiveBooks(books).filter(checkBookSent)
Which I find a lot nicer.
Acting on #Benjamins's suggestion, here is what the code would look like when checkSentBooks returns a promise:
var request = Q.nfbind(require("request")); // a promised version.
function checkActiveBooks(books) {
return Q.all(_(books).map(function(book) {
// a callback with multiple arguments will resolve the promise with
// an array, so we use `spread` here
return request('http://localhost:5000/books?l=0&q=' + book.name).spread(function(response, body) {
var books = JSON.parse(body);
if (_.isEmpty(books)) return null;
return Q.all(_(book.users).map(function(user) {
return checkSentBooks(user.userBook.dataValues).then(function(sentBooks) {
// ^^^^^^ return a promise to the array for `Q.all`
return {
user: user,
book: book.name,
books: _.reject(books, function(obj) {
return sentBooks.indexOf(obj.id) > -1;
})
};
});
}));
});
}));
}