how do I set up my angularjs controller - javascript

I'm just messing around with angular a bit and I built a simple task API. This api has assigned and accepted tasks. Now when building the app I have these routes:
TaskManager.config(['$routeProvider',
function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.
when('/:username/assigned-tasks', {
templateUrl: 'app/partials/assigned-tasks.html',
controller: 'TaskController'
}).
when('/:username/accepted-tasks', {
templateUrl: 'app/partials/assigned-tasks.html',
controller: 'TaskController'
}).
otherwise({
redirectTo: '/'
});
}]);
And here is the task controller I started building and then realized this was not going to work
TaskManager.controller('TaskController', ['$scope', 'AssignedTasksService', function($scope, AssignedTasksService)
{
$scope.tasks = [];
loadAssignedTasks();
function applyRemoteData( Tasks ) {
$scope.tasks = Tasks;
}
function loadAssignedTasks() {
AssignedTasksService.getAssignedTasks()
.then(
function( tasks ) {
applyRemoteData( tasks );
}
);
}
}]);
The getAssignedTasks funciton is just a function that runs a http get request to the api url and either returns and error or the api data
now as you can see the assigned tasks are automatically loaded once it hits the TaskController which is obviously a problem since I need to also be able to get accepted tasks. Now do I need to create a separate controller for accepted tasks or is there a way for maybe me to check the url from the controller and from there I can decide if I want to run the loadAssignedTasks function or the loadAcceptedTasks (which I haven't created yet). but it would just do the same thing as the loadAssignedTasks function but for the accepted tasks

As mentioned in the comments there are multiple ways to solve. All depending on current use case. But you should probably use seperate controllers to solve this problem. Also inject the data(tasks) into the controller rather than fetching them inside the controller. Consider the following example:
var resolveAssignedTasks = function(AssignedTasksService) {
return AssignedTasksService.getAssignedTasks();
};
var resolveAcceptedTasks = function(AcceptedTasksService) {
return AcceptedTasksService.getAcceptedTasks();
};
TaskManager.config(['$routeProvider',
function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.
when('/:username/assigned-tasks', {
templateUrl: 'app/partials/assigned-tasks.html',
controller: 'TaskController',
resolve: {
tasks: resolveAssignedTasks
}
}).
when('/:username/accepted-tasks', {
templateUrl: 'app/partials/assigned-tasks.html',
controller: 'TaskController',
resolve: {
tasks: resolveAssignedTasks
}
}).
otherwise({
redirectTo: '/'
});
}]);
Controllers:
TaskManager.controller('AssignedTaskController', ['$scope', 'tasks', function($scope, tasks)
{
$scope.tasks = tasks;
}]);
TaskManager.controller('AcceptedTaskController', ['$scope', 'tasks', function($scope, tasks)
{
$scope.tasks = tasks;
}]);
You could also by doing this use a single controller by merging the resolveFunctions into one function that returns the appropriate tasks depending on the current route. Hope this helps.

Related

angular resolve reload when same route reloading

How can I reload the Angular resolve with the reload?
My code :
.when('/dashbord', {
title: 'dashbord',
templateUrl: 'views/dashbord.php',
controller: 'dashbordController',
resolve: {
getDashbord: function (getDashbordService) {
return getDashbordService;
}
}
})
Reload function :
app.run(['$rootScope', '$route', '$templateCache', function ($rootScope, $route, $templateCache) {
$rootScope.changeRoute = function(){
var currentPageTemplate = $route.current.templateUrl;
$templateCache.remove(currentPageTemplate);
$route.reload();
};
}]);
The above function reload only the view. It doesn't reload the resolve.
How can i do it in angular ?
I created plunker for you that shows that
$route.reload()
fires resolve on state
I know this is a late answer, but one thing to keep in mind is that Angular services are singletons -- which means if you define your resolve function as a service (esp. one that makes an $http request), you will get the same results each time the route resolves.
For example, this uses an Angular service that makes an $http request, and won't make a new $http request on $route.reload():
angular.module('myApp').factory('getDashboardService', ['$http', function getDashboardService($http) {
return $http.get('/path/to/resource'); // returns a promise
}]).config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/dashboard', {
title: 'dashboard',
templateUrl: 'views/dashboard.php',
controller: 'DashboardController',
resolve: {
getDashbord: 'getDashboardService' // refers to an Angular service
}
});
}]);
...but this will, because it is not an injected service:
angular.module('myApp').config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/dashboard', {
title: 'dashboard',
templateUrl: 'views/dashboard.php',
controller: 'DashboardController',
resolve: {
getDashboard: ['$http', function($http) {
return $http.get('/path/to/resource');
}]
}
});
});
Here is a JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/sscovil/77ys9hz5/

Reading $Cookies in AngularJS from a method

I am really new with AngularJS and I have been working in an example for few days
https://github.com/cornflourblue/angular-registration-login-example. The thing is that im trying to read a cookie that i sent from server, and in that example the angular-cookie library is so old like (1.2) so i replaced it with the newest one. The problem comes when im trying to access to the run method, i've no access to $cookies var, i tried to inject it without injecting.
I actually have no idea what's happening. So if you could help me a bit (&& ||) recommend me newest and nicer examples would be awesome.
(function () {
'use strict';
var app = angular
.module('app', ['ngRoute', 'ngCookies'])
.config(config)
.run(run);
config.$inject = ['$routeProvider', '$locationProvider'];
function config($routeProvider, $locationProvider) {
$routeProvider
.when('/', {
controller: 'HomeController',
templateUrl: 'AngularJS/home/home.view.html',
controllerAs: 'vm'
})
.when('/login', {
controller: 'LoginController',
templateUrl: 'AngularJS/login/login.view.html',
controllerAs: 'vm'
})
.when('/register', {
controller: 'RegisterController',
templateUrl: 'AngularJS/register/register.view.html',
controllerAs: 'vm'
})
.otherwise({ redirectTo: 'AngularJS/login' });
}
run.$inject = ['$rootScope', '$location', '$http'];
function run($rootScope, $location, $http, $cookies) {
//I want to use $cookies here, but i canno't seem a possible way.
// keep user logged in after page refresh
$rootScope.globals = $cookies.get('globals') || {};
if ($rootScope.globals.currentUser) {
$http.defaults.headers.common['Authorization'] = 'Basic ' + $rootScope.globals.currentUser.authdata; // jshint ignore:line
}
$rootScope.$on('$locationChangeStart', function (event, next, current) {
// redirect to login page if not logged in and trying to access a restricted page
var restrictedPage = $.inArray($location.path(), ['/login', '/register']) === -1;
var loggedIn = $rootScope.globals.currentUser;
if (restrictedPage && !loggedIn) {
$location.path('/login');
}
});
}
})();
Sorry for my poor skills in English... (Not my mothertoungue) :·)
Thanks alot.
You forgot to add $cookies to the run.$inject array.
Moreover, defining .$inject arrays is optional as long as you use the standard dependencies names in your component functions' parameters. Here removing your .$inject definitions should leave you with a lighter and functional application.

AngularJS. Initialize controller with different data

I'm using $routeProvider for routing in my Angular app. And for 2 routes I'm using same HTML template and same Controller.
when('/products, {
templateUrl: 'views/products.html',
controller: 'ProductListCtrl'
}).
when('/myProducts', {
templateUrl: 'views/products.html',
controller: 'ProductListCtrl'
}).
Only difference in data that I want to show. I.e. for path products I want AJAX request to myserver:8080/products and for for path myProducts I want to load data from AJAX request to myserver:8080/products/my.
For now I i'm using $location service to distinguish the current page (products or myProducts) and load apropriate data.
Is there some more elegant way to do it? For example using resolve method of $routeProvider?
The best way to reuse controller name in today scenario is to use resolve with $routeparams.
You can modify your code as below
when('/products, {
templateUrl: 'views/products.html',
controller: 'ProductListCtrl',
resolve: {
product: function($http) {
return $http.get('/products')
},
needToShowFilter:function($q){
var showfilter = $q.defer();
showfilter.resolve(false);
return showfilter.promise
}
}
}).
when('/myProducts', {
templateUrl: 'views/products.html',
controller: 'ProductListCtrl',
resolve: {
product: function($http) {
return $http.get('/products/my')
},
needToShowFilter:function($q){
var showfilter = $q.defer();
showfilter.resolve(true);
return showfilter.promise
}
}
}).
And then in your controller you can inject the product into the controller code.
try to add $route in your controller, and log
$route.current
to see what you have inside, i think thats the way to get the information

$routeProvider - Injecting same dependency for all routes

The following code:
$routeProvider
.when("/page1", { controller: "MyController", resolve: {Strategy: "StrategyOne"}})
waits for the Strategy dependency to be resolved before to instantiate the controller "MyController".
In my application I have a function which returns a promise, which when resolved, gives the current user. Let's called that function Authentication.currentUser()
I would like all the pages of my app to wait for that promise to be resolved before to render a page. I could happily add a line for each route declaration but I would rather avoid duplication.
I have a controller called 'MainCtrl' which is called for all pages thanks to this line in my template:
<html ng-app="clientApp" ng-controller="MainCtrl">
I think one possible way to address this would be if it was possible to specify Authentication.currentUser() as a dependency of "MainCtrl" at the controller level (not at the route level because this dependency does not depend on a particular route).
Thanks for your help guys!
For those who want to address this with the standard $routeProvider, this is what I came out with:
$rootScope.$on('$routeChangeStart', function (event, next, current) {
if (!next.resolve){ next.resolve = {} }
next.resolve.currentUser = function(Authentication){
return Authentication.currentUser();
};
});
If you can move from the default router, to ui-router, then you can do this with nested states. Just copying the example from https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/wiki/Nested-States-%26-Nested-Views#inherited-resolved-dependencies :
$stateProvider.state('parent', {
resolve:{
resA: function(){
return {'value': 'A'};
}
},
controller: function($scope, resA){
$scope.resA = resA.value;
}
})
.state('parent.child', {
resolve:{
resB: function(resA){
return {'value': resA.value + 'B'};
}
},
controller: function($scope, resA, resB){
$scope.resA2 = resA.value;
$scope.resB = resB.value;
}

Delaying AngularJS route change until model loaded to prevent flicker

I am wondering if there is a way (similar to Gmail) for AngularJS to delay showing a new route until after each model and its data has been fetched using its respective services.
For example, if there were a ProjectsController that listed all Projects and project_index.html which was the template that showed these Projects, Project.query() would be fetched completely before showing the new page.
Until then, the old page would still continue to show (for example, if I were browsing another page and then decided to see this Project index).
$routeProvider resolve property allows delaying of route change until data is loaded.
First define a route with resolve attribute like this.
angular.module('phonecat', ['phonecatFilters', 'phonecatServices', 'phonecatDirectives']).
config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.
when('/phones', {
templateUrl: 'partials/phone-list.html',
controller: PhoneListCtrl,
resolve: PhoneListCtrl.resolve}).
when('/phones/:phoneId', {
templateUrl: 'partials/phone-detail.html',
controller: PhoneDetailCtrl,
resolve: PhoneDetailCtrl.resolve}).
otherwise({redirectTo: '/phones'});
}]);
notice that the resolve property is defined on route.
function PhoneListCtrl($scope, phones) {
$scope.phones = phones;
$scope.orderProp = 'age';
}
PhoneListCtrl.resolve = {
phones: function(Phone, $q) {
// see: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/angular/DGf7yyD4Oc4
var deferred = $q.defer();
Phone.query(function(successData) {
deferred.resolve(successData);
}, function(errorData) {
deferred.reject(); // you could optionally pass error data here
});
return deferred.promise;
},
delay: function($q, $defer) {
var delay = $q.defer();
$defer(delay.resolve, 1000);
return delay.promise;
}
}
Notice that the controller definition contains a resolve object which declares things which should be available to the controller constructor. Here the phones is injected into the controller and it is defined in the resolve property.
The resolve.phones function is responsible for returning a promise. All of the promises are collected and the route change is delayed until after all of the promises are resolved.
Working demo: http://mhevery.github.com/angular-phonecat/app/#/phones
Source: https://github.com/mhevery/angular-phonecat/commit/ba33d3ec2d01b70eb5d3d531619bf90153496831
Here's a minimal working example which works for Angular 1.0.2
Template:
<script type="text/ng-template" id="/editor-tpl.html">
Editor Template {{datasets}}
</script>
<div ng-view>
</div>
JavaScript:
function MyCtrl($scope, datasets) {
$scope.datasets = datasets;
}
MyCtrl.resolve = {
datasets : function($q, $http) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http({method: 'GET', url: '/someUrl'})
.success(function(data) {
deferred.resolve(data)
})
.error(function(data){
//actually you'd want deffered.reject(data) here
//but to show what would happen on success..
deferred.resolve("error value");
});
return deferred.promise;
}
};
var myApp = angular.module('myApp', [], function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/', {
templateUrl: '/editor-tpl.html',
controller: MyCtrl,
resolve: MyCtrl.resolve
});
});​
​
http://jsfiddle.net/dTJ9N/3/
Streamlined version:
Since $http() already returns a promise (aka deferred), we actually don't need to create our own. So we can simplify MyCtrl. resolve to:
MyCtrl.resolve = {
datasets : function($http) {
return $http({
method: 'GET',
url: 'http://fiddle.jshell.net/'
});
}
};
The result of $http() contains data, status, headers and config objects, so we need to change the body of MyCtrl to:
$scope.datasets = datasets.data;
http://jsfiddle.net/dTJ9N/5/
I see some people asking how to do this using the angular.controller method with minification friendly dependency injection. Since I just got this working I felt obliged to come back and help. Here's my solution (adopted from the original question and Misko's answer):
angular.module('phonecat', ['phonecatFilters', 'phonecatServices', 'phonecatDirectives']).
config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.
when('/phones', {
templateUrl: 'partials/phone-list.html',
controller: PhoneListCtrl,
resolve: {
phones: ["Phone", "$q", function(Phone, $q) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
Phone.query(function(successData) {
deferred.resolve(successData);
}, function(errorData) {
deferred.reject(); // you could optionally pass error data here
});
return deferred.promise;
]
},
delay: ["$q","$defer", function($q, $defer) {
var delay = $q.defer();
$defer(delay.resolve, 1000);
return delay.promise;
}
]
},
}).
when('/phones/:phoneId', {
templateUrl: 'partials/phone-detail.html',
controller: PhoneDetailCtrl,
resolve: PhoneDetailCtrl.resolve}).
otherwise({redirectTo: '/phones'});
}]);
angular.controller("PhoneListCtrl", [ "$scope", "phones", ($scope, phones) {
$scope.phones = phones;
$scope.orderProp = 'age';
}]);
Since this code is derived from the question/most popular answer it is untested, but it should send you in the right direction if you already understand how to make minification friendly angular code. The one part that my own code didn't requires was an injection of "Phone" into the resolve function for 'phones', nor did I use any 'delay' object at all.
I also recommend this youtube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6KITGRQujQ&list=UUKW92i7iQFuNILqQOUOCrFw&index=4&feature=plcp , which helped me quite a bit
Should it interest you I've decided to also paste my own code (Written in coffeescript) so you can see how I got it working.
FYI, in advance I use a generic controller that helps me do CRUD on several models:
appModule.config ['$routeProvider', ($routeProvider) ->
genericControllers = ["boards","teachers","classrooms","students"]
for controllerName in genericControllers
$routeProvider
.when "/#{controllerName}/",
action: 'confirmLogin'
controller: 'GenericController'
controllerName: controllerName
templateUrl: "/static/templates/#{controllerName}.html"
resolve:
items : ["$q", "$route", "$http", ($q, $route, $http) ->
deferred = $q.defer()
controllerName = $route.current.controllerName
$http(
method: "GET"
url: "/api/#{controllerName}/"
)
.success (response) ->
deferred.resolve(response.payload)
.error (response) ->
deferred.reject(response.message)
return deferred.promise
]
$routeProvider
.otherwise
redirectTo: '/'
action: 'checkStatus'
]
appModule.controller "GenericController", ["$scope", "$route", "$http", "$cookies", "items", ($scope, $route, $http, $cookies, items) ->
$scope.items = items
#etc ....
]
This commit, which is part of version 1.1.5 and above, exposes the $promise object of $resource. Versions of ngResource including this commit allow resolving resources like this:
$routeProvider
resolve: {
data: function(Resource) {
return Resource.get().$promise;
}
}
controller
app.controller('ResourceCtrl', ['$scope', 'data', function($scope, data) {
$scope.data = data;
}]);
This snippet is dependency injection friendly (I even use it in combination of ngmin and uglify) and it's a more elegant domain driven based solution.
The example below registers a Phone resource and a constant phoneRoutes, which contains all your routing information for that (phone) domain. Something I didn't like in the provided answer was the location of the resolve logic -- the main module should not know anything or be bothered about the way the resource arguments are provided to the controller. This way the logic stays in the same domain.
Note: if you're using ngmin (and if you're not: you should) you only have to write the resolve functions with the DI array convention.
angular.module('myApp').factory('Phone',function ($resource) {
return $resource('/api/phone/:id', {id: '#id'});
}).constant('phoneRoutes', {
'/phone': {
templateUrl: 'app/phone/index.tmpl.html',
controller: 'PhoneIndexController'
},
'/phone/create': {
templateUrl: 'app/phone/edit.tmpl.html',
controller: 'PhoneEditController',
resolve: {
phone: ['$route', 'Phone', function ($route, Phone) {
return new Phone();
}]
}
},
'/phone/edit/:id': {
templateUrl: 'app/phone/edit.tmpl.html',
controller: 'PhoneEditController',
resolve: {
form: ['$route', 'Phone', function ($route, Phone) {
return Phone.get({ id: $route.current.params.id }).$promise;
}]
}
}
});
The next piece is injecting the routing data when the module is in the configure state and applying it to the $routeProvider.
angular.module('myApp').config(function ($routeProvider,
phoneRoutes,
/* ... otherRoutes ... */) {
$routeProvider.when('/', { templateUrl: 'app/main/index.tmpl.html' });
// Loop through all paths provided by the injected route data.
angular.forEach(phoneRoutes, function(routeData, path) {
$routeProvider.when(path, routeData);
});
$routeProvider.otherwise({ redirectTo: '/' });
});
Testing the route configuration with this setup is also pretty easy:
describe('phoneRoutes', function() {
it('should match route configuration', function() {
module('myApp');
// Mock the Phone resource
function PhoneMock() {}
PhoneMock.get = function() { return {}; };
module(function($provide) {
$provide.value('Phone', FormMock);
});
inject(function($route, $location, $rootScope, phoneRoutes) {
angular.forEach(phoneRoutes, function (routeData, path) {
$location.path(path);
$rootScope.$digest();
expect($route.current.templateUrl).toBe(routeData.templateUrl);
expect($route.current.controller).toBe(routeData.controller);
});
});
});
});
You can see it in full glory in my latest (upcoming) experiment.
Although this method works fine for me, I really wonder why the $injector isn't delaying construction of anything when it detects injection of anything that is a promise object; it would make things soooOOOOOooOOOOO much easier.
Edit: used Angular v1.2(rc2)
Delaying showing the route is sure to lead to an asynchronous tangle... why not simply track the loading status of your main entity and use that in the view. For example in your controller you might use both the success and error callbacks on ngResource:
$scope.httpStatus = 0; // in progress
$scope.projects = $resource.query('/projects', function() {
$scope.httpStatus = 200;
}, function(response) {
$scope.httpStatus = response.status;
});
Then in the view you could do whatever:
<div ng-show="httpStatus == 0">
Loading
</div>
<div ng-show="httpStatus == 200">
Real stuff
<div ng-repeat="project in projects">
...
</div>
</div>
<div ng-show="httpStatus >= 400">
Error, not found, etc. Could distinguish 4xx not found from
5xx server error even.
</div>
I worked from Misko's code above and this is what I've done with it. This is a more current solution since $defer has been changed to $timeout. Substituting $timeout however will wait for the timeout period (in Misko's code, 1 second), then return the data hoping it's resolved in time. With this way, it returns asap.
function PhoneListCtrl($scope, phones) {
$scope.phones = phones;
$scope.orderProp = 'age';
}
PhoneListCtrl.resolve = {
phones: function($q, Phone) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
Phone.query(function(phones) {
deferred.resolve(phones);
});
return deferred.promise;
}
}
Using AngularJS 1.1.5
Updating the 'phones' function in Justen's answer using AngularJS 1.1.5 syntax.
Original:
phones: function($q, Phone) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
Phone.query(function(phones) {
deferred.resolve(phones);
});
return deferred.promise;
}
Updated:
phones: function(Phone) {
return Phone.query().$promise;
}
Much shorter thanks to the Angular team and contributors. :)
This is also the answer of Maximilian Hoffmann. Apparently that commit made it into 1.1.5.
You can use $routeProvider resolve property to delay route change until data is loaded.
angular.module('app', ['ngRoute']).
config(['$routeProvider', function($routeProvider, EntitiesCtrlResolve, EntityCtrlResolve) {
$routeProvider.
when('/entities', {
templateUrl: 'entities.html',
controller: 'EntitiesCtrl',
resolve: EntitiesCtrlResolve
}).
when('/entity/:entityId', {
templateUrl: 'entity.html',
controller: 'EntityCtrl',
resolve: EntityCtrlResolve
}).
otherwise({redirectTo: '/entities'});
}]);
Notice that the resolve property is defined on route.
EntitiesCtrlResolve and EntityCtrlResolve is constant objects defined in same file as EntitiesCtrl and EntityCtrl controllers.
// EntitiesCtrl.js
angular.module('app').constant('EntitiesCtrlResolve', {
Entities: function(EntitiesService) {
return EntitiesService.getAll();
}
});
angular.module('app').controller('EntitiesCtrl', function(Entities) {
$scope.entities = Entities;
// some code..
});
// EntityCtrl.js
angular.module('app').constant('EntityCtrlResolve', {
Entity: function($route, EntitiesService) {
return EntitiesService.getById($route.current.params.projectId);
}
});
angular.module('app').controller('EntityCtrl', function(Entity) {
$scope.entity = Entity;
// some code..
});
I like darkporter's idea because it will be easy for a dev team new to AngularJS to understand and worked straight away.
I created this adaptation which uses 2 divs, one for loader bar and another for actual content displayed after data is loaded. Error handling would be done elsewhere.
Add a 'ready' flag to $scope:
$http({method: 'GET', url: '...'}).
success(function(data, status, headers, config) {
$scope.dataForView = data;
$scope.ready = true; // <-- set true after loaded
})
});
In html view:
<div ng-show="!ready">
<!-- Show loading graphic, e.g. Twitter Boostrap progress bar -->
<div class="progress progress-striped active">
<div class="bar" style="width: 100%;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div ng-show="ready">
<!-- Real content goes here and will appear after loading -->
</div>
See also: Boostrap progress bar docs
I liked above answers and learned a lot from them but there is something that is missing in most of the above answers.
I was stuck in a similar scenario where I was resolving url with some data that is fetched in the first request from the server. Problem I faced was what if the promise is rejected.
I was using a custom provider which used to return a Promise which was resolved by the resolve of $routeProvider at the time of config phase.
What I want to stress here is the concept of when it does something like this.
It sees the url in url bar and then respective when block in called controller and view is referred so far so good.
Lets say I have following config phase code.
App.when('/', {
templateUrl: '/assets/campaigns/index.html',
controller: 'CampaignListCtr',
resolve : {
Auth : function(){
return AuthServiceProvider.auth('campaign');
}
}
})
// Default route
.otherwise({
redirectTo: '/segments'
});
On root url in browser first block of run get called otherwise otherwise gets called.
Let's imagine a scenario I hit rootUrl in address bar AuthServicePrivider.auth() function gets called.
Lets say Promise returned is in reject state what then???
Nothing gets rendered at all.
Otherwise block will not get executed as it is for any url which is not defined in the config block and is unknown to angularJs config phase.
We will have to handle the event that gets fired when this promise is not resolved. On failure $routeChangeErorr gets fired on $rootScope.
It can be captured as shown in code below.
$rootScope.$on('$routeChangeError', function(event, current, previous, rejection){
// Use params in redirection logic.
// event is the routeChangeEvent
// current is the current url
// previous is the previous url
$location.path($rootScope.rootPath);
});
IMO It's generally a good idea to put event tracking code in run block of application. This code run just after the config phase of the application.
App.run(['$routeParams', '$rootScope', '$location', function($routeParams, $rootScope, $location){
$rootScope.rootPath = "my custom path";
// Event to listen to all the routeChangeErrors raised
// by the resolve in config part of application
$rootScope.$on('$routeChangeError', function(event, current, previous, rejection){
// I am redirecting to rootPath I have set above.
$location.path($rootScope.rootPath);
});
}]);
This way we can handle promise failure at the time of config phase.
I have had a complex multi-level sliding panel interface, with disabled screen layer. Creating directive on disable screen layer that would create click event to execute the state like
$state.go('account.stream.social.view');
were producing a flicking effect. history.back() instead of it worked ok, however its not always back in history in my case. SO what I find out is that if I simply create attribute href on my disable screen instead of state.go , worked like a charm.
<a class="disable-screen" back></a>
Directive 'back'
app.directive('back', [ '$rootScope', function($rootScope) {
return {
restrict : 'A',
link : function(scope, element, attrs) {
element.attr('href', $rootScope.previousState.replace(/\./gi, '/'));
}
};
} ]);
app.js I just save previous state
app.run(function($rootScope, $state) {
$rootScope.$on("$stateChangeStart", function(event, toState, toParams, fromState, fromParams) {
$rootScope.previousState = fromState.name;
$rootScope.currentState = toState.name;
});
});
One possible solution might be to use the ng-cloak directive with the element where we are using the models e.g.
<div ng-cloak="">
Value in myModel is: {{myModel}}
</div>
I think this one takes least effort.

Categories

Resources