I'm trying to create a column (<div id="scroller"></div>) inside of which the user will be able to scroll infinitely upwards or downwards.
I believe the trick is to increase the height of <div id="scrollee"></div> downwards every time the user's scroll is about to reach the bottom and increase its height upwards every time the user's scroll is about the reach the top.
Alternatively (seems easier), the top of <div id="scrollee"></div> could be increased every time the user's scroll is about to reach the bottom and vice versa.
However, I can't seem to find the right combination. I tried the 2nd version (increasing the top of <div id="scrollee"></div>) and obviously only managed to make it infinitely scrollable downwards. Decreasing the top when moving upwards didn't work so I have omitted that part from the code.
Any suggestions ?
You can see it in action here : http://jsfiddle.net/1uzdj12d/5/
CSS
#scroller {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
height: 200px;
width: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid black;
}
#scroller>div {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
#scrollee {
position: absolute;
top: -10px;
left: 0px;
height: 200%;
width: 100%;
}
span {
position:absolute;
top:0px;
left: 300px;
}
HTML
<div id="scroller">
<div>
<div id="scrollee"></div>
</div>
</div>
<span></span>
Javascript
var timeout;
$("#scroller>div").scroll(function ()
{
clearTimeout(timeout);
$('span').text('scrolling');
timeout = setTimeout(function ()
{
$('span').text('');
}, 500);
});
$("#scroller>div").scroll(function ()
{
var currentTop = $("#scroller>div").scrollTop();
$(this).find('div').css({top : currentTop});
});
Turns out it was easier than I thought :-)
If you want to create an infinitely scrollable div (on the y-axis), all you need to do is set the height of <div id="scrollee"> to the height of <div id="scroller"> plus 20px. You also need to set its initial scrollTop to 10px (this will allow an upwards and downwards scrolling).
Now every time a scroll occurs, reset the scrollTop of <div id="scrollee"> to 10px.
You can see my solution in action here : http://jsfiddle.net/vxzw68jk/22/
If you're wondering why I'm using :
<div id="scroller">
<div>
<div id="scrollee"></div>
</div>
</div>
instead of simply :
<div id="scroller">
<div id="scrollee"></div>
</div>
It's because if you set the width of #scroller>div to 150% the scrollbar will be hidden which can be useful (at least for my project..), you can check it out here : http://jsfiddle.net/8psu5L6v/1/
CSS
#scroller {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
height: 200px;
width: 100px;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid black;
}
#scroller>div {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
#scrollee {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
height: 220px;
width: 100%;
}
span {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 300px;
}
HTML
<div id="scroller">
<div>
<div id="scrollee"></div>
</div>
</div>
<span></span>
Javascript
$("#scroller>div").scrollTop(10);
var timeout;
$("#scroller>div").scroll(function ()
{
$('span').text('scrolling');
$("#scroller>div").scrollTop(10);
clearTimeout(timeout);
timeout = setTimeout(function ()
{
$('span').text('');
}, 500);
});
Related
Trying to emulate position fixed (because I need the effect of background-attachment: fixed, on a div) and I can't seem to get it to perform well enough to use.
I've tried numerous variations, with transforms instead of top, with easings to ease the judder, and using requestAnimationFrame instead of scroll but they all suffer the same problem.
If you checkout the below fiddle you'll see how it works but it's very jumpy/laggy. Is it possible to fix this somehow?
var el = document.getElementsByClassName('shape')[0];
var poffset = el.parentNode.offsetTop;
var scroll;
window.addEventListener('scroll', function(){
scroll = window.pageYOffset;
poffset = el.parentNode.offsetTop;
raf();
});
function raf(){
el.style.transform = 'translateY('+parseInt(scroll-poffset)+'px)';
// requestAnimationFrame(raf);
}
raf();
.content {
height: 100vh;
background-color: #ace;
}
.fixed {
height: 100vh;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
.shape {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
margin-top: -150px;
margin-left: -150px;
background-color: #bada55;
border-radius: 20%;
}
<div class='content'>
</div>
<div class="fixed">
<i class="shape"></i>
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
I have a problem...In the following example i don't want that the div who is fixed get over the div with the background red.
Here is the example:
http://jsfiddle.net/HFjU6/3645/
#fixedContainer
{
background-color:#ddd;
position: fixed;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
top: 0%;
margin-left: -100px; /*half the width*/
}
Alright, I think I get what the OP wants. He wanted a container that stays fixed on the top of the viewport, but remains confined by a parent. This behaviour is known as a conditional sticky behaviour, and is actually implemented in both Firefox (without vendor prefix) and macOS/iOS Safari (with -webkit- prefix): see position: sticky.
Therefore the easiest (but also the least cross-browser compatible) way is simply to modify your markup, such that the sticky element stays within a parent, and you declare position: sticky on it:
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#fixedContainer {
background-color: #ddd;
position: -webkit-sticky;
position: sticky;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
top: 0%;
transform: translate(-50%, 0); /* Negative left margins do not work with sticky */
}
#div1 {
height: 200px;
background-color: #bbb;
}
#div1 .content {
position: relative;
top: -100px; /* Top offset must be manually calculated */
}
#div2 {
height: 500px;
background-color: red;
}
<div id="div1">
<div id="fixedContainer">I am a sticky container that stays within the sticky parent</div>
<div class="content">Sticky parent</div></div>
<div id="div2">Just another element</div>
An alternative would be to use a JS-based solution. In this case, you do not actually have to modify your markup. I have changed the IDs for easier identification of the elements, however.
The gist of the logic is this:
When the scroll position does not exceed the bottom of the parent minus the outer height of the sticky content, then we do not do anything.
When the scroll position exceeds the bottom of the parent minus the outer height of the sticky content, we dynamically calculate the top position of the sticky content so that it remains visually in the parent.
$(function() {
$(window).scroll(function() {
var $c = $('#sticky-container'),
$s = $('#sticky-content'),
$t = $(this); // Short reference to window object
if ($t.scrollTop() > $c.outerHeight() - $s.outerHeight()) {
$s.css('top', $c.offset().top + $c.outerHeight() - $t.scrollTop() - $s.outerHeight());
} else {
$s.css('top', 0);
}
});
});
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
div {
height: 500px;
background-color: red;
}
#sticky-container {
background-color: #bbb;
height: 200px;
}
#sticky-content {
background-color: #ddd;
position: fixed;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin-left: -100px;
left: 50%;
top: 0;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="sticky-content">Sticky content that stays within the bounds of #div1</div>
<div id="sticky-container">Sticky confinement area</div>
<div>Other content</div>
Old answer before OP clarified the question appropriately:
Just give them the appropriate z-index values. In this case, you want to:
Do not use static positioning. This can be done by using position: relative for the large elements, in conjunction with the originally position: fixed element.
Assign the appropriate stacking order. The grey <div> element to have the lowest z-index, followed by the position fixed element, and then by the red element.
There are some catchalls to stacking though: the stacking context is reset when you traverse up or down the node tree. For example, the example will not work if the elements are not siblings.
Here is a proof-of-concept example, modified from your fiddle so that inline CSS is removed.
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#fixedContainer {
background-color: #ddd;
position: fixed;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
top: 0%;
margin-left: -100px;
z-index: 2;
}
#div1 {
height: 200px;
background-color: #bbb;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
#div2 {
height: 500px;
background-color: red;
position: relative;
z-index: 3;
}
<div id="fixedContainer">z-index: 2</div>
<div id="div1">z-index: 1</div>
<div id="div2">z-index: 3</div>
Just give the z-index.
Hope it helps...
http://jsfiddle.net/HFjU6/1/#run
#fixedContainer {
background-color:#ddd;
position: fixed;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
left: 50%;
top: 0%;
margin-left: -100px; /*half the width*/
z-index: 2;
}
.div-red {
position: relative;
z-index: 5;
}
<div id="fixedContainer"></div>
<div style="height:200px;background-color:#bbb;"></div>
<div style="height:500px;background-color:red;" class="div-red"></div>
So I have a page on my website that has some navigation elements that stick on the page when the user scrolls past a certain point. There are three of them, one on the top, one on the left, and one on the right. HTML and CSS is as follows:
<div id="nav" class="nav">
<!--STUFF CONTAINED IN TOP NAV BAR-->
</div>
<div class="right" id="right">
<!--STUFF CONTAINED IN RIGHT NAV-->
</div>
<div class="left" id="left">
<!--STUFF CONTAINED IN LEFT NAV BAR-->
</div>
.nav {
position: absolute;
top: 108px;
height: 45px;
width: 100%;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
.nav_sticky {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
height: 45px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
background-image: url(images/backgrounds/stardust_#2X.png);
z-index: 10;
}
.right {
width: 200px;
height: 900px;
position: absolute;
right: 50%;
margin-right: -538px;
top: 153px;
}
.right_sticky {
width: 200px;
height: 900px;
position: fixed;
right: 50%;
margin-right: -538px;
top: 45px;
}
.left {
width: 200px;
height: 900px;
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -538px;
top: 153px;
}
.left_stick {
width: 200px;
height: 900px;
position: fixed;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -538px;
top: 45px;
}
I then use the follow JQuery to cause these elements to stick.
<script>
$(document).ready(function(){
var navPos = $('#nav').offset().top;
$(window).scroll(function () {
var scrollTop = $(this).scrollTop();
if (scrollTop >= navPos) {
var classNamee = $('#nav').attr('class');
console.log(classNamee);
if (classNamee === "nav") {
$("#nav").toggleClass('nav nav_sticky');
$("#right").toggleClass('right right_sticky');
$("#left").toggleClass('left left_stick');
}
}
if (scrollTop <= navPos) {
var className = $('#nav').attr('class');
console.log(className);
if (className === "nav_sticky") {
$("#nav").toggleClass('nav_sticky nav');
$("#right").toggleClass('right_sticky right');
$("#left").toggleClass('left left_stick');
}
}
});
});
</script>
Here's my problem. This works perfectly for the top and right navs, however no matter what I try, the left nav continues to scroll when the others have stopped. I thought it may have been a typo in the css class, but when I looked in the inspector, the .toggleClass function doesn't even change the class on the #left element when it does on the other two. Any ideas as to what could be causing this?
If I copy/paste your sample code as-is to jsFiddle and run it, when you scroll down far enough, it does correctly toggle everything to *_sticky classes, but something about the negative margin-right on the right class element seems to reset the scroll to the top (at least in Chrome) when it flips between .right and .right-stick. When the scroll gets reset, it also reruns your event handeler and changes all the classes back.
Try removing these lines from your CSS and see if the behavior works right (it does in Chrome in a jsFiddle)
.right {
...
/*margin-right: -538px;*/
.right-stick {
...
/*margin-right: -538px;*/
I am working on a form that has multiple pages that I would like to scroll in/out of view. I have to use absolute positioning to force the divs (pages) to scroll in a single line; however, this causes the parent divs height to not be responsive to the children (which have varying heights based on amount of content plus dynamic content being added to them).
How can I make the parents height be responsive to the children while still allowing my pages to scroll in a single line (I have already tried float)?
Is there anyway to achieve the same effect as the jsFiddle Demo without having to use absolute positioning?
Example: jsFiddle Demo <--- How do I make the toggle button remain below the divs no matter how tall they are?
#div1{
width: 500px;
height: 110px;
background-color: blue;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
}
#div2{
width: 500px;
height: 110px;
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
}
.container {
width: 800px;
position: relative;
height: 100px;
}
<p>some content here </p>
<div class="container">
<div id="div1"></div>
<div id="div2"></div>
</div>
<button>Toggle</button>
EDIT
Updated jsFiddle to show problem better.
You inspect the height and position of the child elements and calculate the total height and apply that to the parent. Absolutely-positioned elements have their own layout context, so CSS alone cannot solve this.
The height in #div1 and #div2 is causing an overflow of the .container div:
Set the height of #div1 and #div2 to the same height as its container:
#div1{
width: 500px;
height: 100px;
background-color: blue;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
}
#div2{
width: 500px;
height: 100px;
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
}
Or set the .container to overflow:hidden:
.container {
width: 800px;
position: relative;
overflow:hidden
height: 100px;
}
Updated jsfiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/FkNa2/193/
Depending on what you want, i Updated your fiddle:
Button position is fixed at document loading, based on height of the biggest absolute element:
$(function(){
$('#container').height(Math.max($('#div1').height(),$('#div2').height()));
});
you can see the fiddle here
Button position is recomputed each time the toggle is done, you can use the complete option of one of your toggle to handle it:
$div2.toggle('slide', {
direction: 'left',
complete:function(){
$('#container').height($('#'+currentDiv).height());
}
}, 'slow');
see the fiddle here
use min-height for #div2
#div2{
width: 500px;
min-height: 100px;
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
}
Been working on this layout for some time now and each way I take I run into some sort of obstacle (v1 of this here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14572569/how-can-i-contain-pos-abs-div-within-specific-area)
What I'm trying to do now is to have the size of .spread adapt to the browser windows width and height, so it'll never exceed what the user currently can see in their browser (.spread currently have fixed width/height, for demo purposes). The ideal would to be able to resize on the fly and it adapts instantly (i.e. no media queries).
It works as it should in the v1 version I link to above, but then I had problems with the fade effect due to that .spread lacked an actual width/height.
Here's the new demo:
http://jsbin.com/uciguf/1
UPDATE: The markup can be changed as long as it works as described.
<div class="scrollblock" id="scroll_spread-1">
<div class="action"><!-- --></div>
<!-- -->
</div>
<div class="scrollblock" id="scroll_spread-2">
<div class="action"><!-- --></div>
<!-- -->
</div>
<div class="contentblock" id="spread-1">
<div class="inner windowwidth windowheight">
<div class="content">
<span></span>
<div class="spread">
<div class="fade"><!-- --></div>
<div class="left centerimage">
<img src="http://s7.postimage.org/8qnf5rmyz/image.jpg">
</div>
<div class="right centerimage">
<img src="http://s7.postimage.org/kjl89zjez/image.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="contentblock" id="spread-2">
<div class="inner windowwidth windowheight">
<div class="content">
<span></span>
<div class="spread">
<div class="fade"><!-- --></div>
<div class="left centerimage">
<img src="http://s7.postimage.org/5l2tfk4cr/image.jpg">
</div>
<div class="right centerimage">
<img src="http://s7.postimage.org/fjns21dsb/image.jpg">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
background: #eee;
line-height: 1.2em;
font-size: 29px;
text-align: center;
height: 100%;
color: #fff;
}
.scrollblock {
position: relative;
margin: 0;
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
.contentblock {
margin: 0;
width: 0;
min-height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
right: 0;
}
.contentblock .inner {
z-index: 2;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
background: #eee;
}
.fade {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
background-color: #000;
opacity: 0;
z-index: 3;
}
.content {
height: 100%;
}
.content span {
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
.content .spread {
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
#spread-1 {
color: #000;
z-index: 105;
}
#spread-2 {
z-index: 110;
}
.spread {
max-height: 800px;
max-width: 1130px;
position: relative;
}
.spread .left {
position: relative;
width: 50%;
float: left;
text-align: right;
height: 100%;
}
.spread .right {
position: relative;
width: 50%;
float: left;
text-align: left;
height: 100%;
}
div.centerimage {
overflow: hidden;
}
div.centerimage img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
div.centerimage span {
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
div.centerimage img {
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
P.S. The title is really bad, don't know what I'm looking for, but please change to something more informative if you can think of anything better.
Three-Quarters of the Way to a Full Solution
This is not quite a full solution yet, as it cannot accommodate a super narrow width window size (like your old version did). However, it is a good step toward what you seek.
Here is the example.
The key things that have been changed:
Added
.spread { height: 93%; } /* You had originally wanted a height difference */
Removed
overflow: hidden from div.centerimage.
width: 50% from .left and .right.
maybe you could just pin your .spread divisor
.spread {
bottom: 11px;
left: 11px;
right: 11px;
top: 11px;
position: absolute;
/* ... */
}
This way, it will be resized the same of the viewport area.
Here a jsFiddle to demonstrate.
Carry on
I know you were probably looking for a solely CSS/HTML solution, but really you're probably best off using some Javascript. There's no way to be clean and precise just using CSS & HTML.
But if you run a tiny bit of JavaScript on page load and window-resize, then your divs can have actual height/width values and scale cleanly.
The trick is to have the outside div get its width/height set by the JavaScript, and then all its children use % dimensions so they grow appropriately.
Here's the basics using some JQuery:
<script type="text/javascript">
//Function to get the current window dimensions.
function get_window_dims() {
var dims = [];
if (parseInt(navigator.appVersion)>3) {
if (navigator.appName=="Netscape") {
dims[0] = window.innerWidth;
dims[1] = window.innerHeight;
}
if (navigator.appName.indexOf("Microsoft")!=-1) {
dims[0] = document.body.offsetWidth;
dims[1] = document.body.offsetHeight;
}
}
return dims;
}
function ResizeDivs {
var dims = get_widnow_dims();
var div_width = Math.floor(dims[0] * 0.93); // calculating the div width to be 93% of the window width
$('div.spread').css('width',div_width+'px');
}
$(function() {
ResizeDivs();
$(window).resize(function(){
ResizeDivs();
});
});
</script>
You could easily clean up this code to be more concise, but I figured I'd put it out here this way for you to see all the parts.
If you wanted to spend the extra time, you could even add more JQuery to animate the divs when the window resizes.
Hope this helps.
Have you considered using a responsive framework to solve your issue? You can set width's and heights to percentages and have min-width, min-height.